Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 6001–6200
The petitioner, Ganesh Das, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in offences under several sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act, stemming from an alleged sexual assault by his son on a six‑year‑old girl and subsequent alleged assault on the informant and his wife leading to a miscarriage. …
The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar Chaudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged firing on an informant and others following a motorcycle accident, with no reported injuries. He faced charges under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Abdul Wahid Ansari, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 3.6 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that the actual offender fled the scene, …
The petitioner, Sonu Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged firing on an informant and others following a motorcycle accident on 09.01.2026, with charges under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that no one sustained bullet injuries, …
Manjeet Kumar was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 111(3) and 313 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 25(1‑ba), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after co‑accused were found with firearms and identified him as a participant. The petitioner argued that he was hospitalized for a …
Petitioner Mohammad Reyaz was named in a complaint (Case No. 411 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 448, 323, 498A, 389 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4 for alleged mental and physical cruelty linked to a dowry demand of Rs. 2 lakh. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, …
The petitioners, Ajay Paswan, Shambhu Paswan and Anil Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 266.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They contended that they were not caught in possession, were not owners of the …
The petitioners, Sanoj Giri and Sunny Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged assault, bodily injury and alleged witch‑practice related offences under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Dyne (Prevention of Witch Practice) Act. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 360 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …
The petitioner, Sachin Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 309.60 litres of liquor from an open field adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his …
Four brothers were named in FIR No.21 of 2026 for alleged assault using lathi, iron rod and other weapons, causing simple injuries and a non‑vital fracture. They filed an anticipatory bail petition under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. During the pendency, petitioner No.2 (Vikash Kumar) was …
The petitioner, Amarjeet Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 40 litres of liquor and 60 litres of raw material recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was …
Amarjit @ Mithu, a resident of Muzaffarpur, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from a vehicle and a mustard field. He contended …
Shailendra Kumar Gupta applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(d) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 kg of mahua flower from a motorcycle he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …
Anish Singh sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case alleging offences under Sections 338, 336(3) and 304(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 800 litres of spirit from a Scorpio …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.46 litres of liquor from a field adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Nagendra Kumar Baitha, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging seizure of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a public orchard. He claimed a clean antecedent, no possession at the time of arrest, and that the complaint was filed by a …
Petitioners Rishikesh Kumar and Amresh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered for offences under Section 111 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 270 litres of liquor were recovered from a Maruti Suzuki car. They …
The petitioner, Ramakant Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 70 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was …
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10.375 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in their conscious …
The petitioner, Niraj Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of 20 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was …
The appellants, three brothers, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged caste-based abuse, assault with a rod and a sharp weapon, and other offences. The Special Judge had …
The petitioners, four residents of Chehra Khurd, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 74, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code alleging assault, extortion and related offences. They contended that they have clean …
Ketan Chaudhary filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Darbhanga, which dismissed his complaint (Case No. 437 of 2022) under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code on the ground that no sanction order was on record. The complaint alleged assault …
The appellant, an 18‑year‑old named Rajan Kumar Sah, was charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste‑based abuse arising from a dispute over mango plucking. He applied for …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Bharti, was implicated in a case alleging fraud in the distribution of government relief (G.R.) to ineligible flood‑affected beneficiaries, with accusations of taking a commission of Rs. 500 and offences under IPC sections 406, 409 and 34. He applied for anticipatory …
The petitioner, Amir Arsad, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry complaint alleging that he was falsely implicated in demands for a four-wheeler and related cruelty. The complainant claimed the petitioner supported dowry demands, while the petitioner argued he was residing in Saudi Arabia, belonged …
The petitioner, Netilal Sahani, was implicated in a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean record and claiming the allegations were false. The petitioner offered to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs. …
The petitioners, three residents of Rangpura, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act (B.N.S.S) for alleged assault and theft. They contended that the FIR was vague, the informant had a family dispute, and the petitioners …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against an acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal Misc. Applications Nos. 12753/2019 & …
The applicant sought revision of a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant executed an affidavit confirming receipt of the …
The Central Bureau of Investigation filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside a discharge order dated 02‑11‑2018 that had released Shilpaben Patel in two CBI cases. A separate misc. application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was filed for condonation of a 222‑day delay in filing the …
The appellants Chandra Prakash and others appealed under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. against a judgment that convicted them under IPC Sections 323/34 and 325/34 and released them on probation under Section 5 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, with sureties. The appellants argued that the …
The appellant Kapil Kumar was charged under Sections 302, 201 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for the alleged murder of his father, Sheeshpal, which the prosecution claimed was a homicide disguised as a road accident. Subsequent investigations, including a Special Investigation Team report …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 24‑04‑2023 issued by the Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) in a complaint alleging criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC for alleged non‑payment of earned wages and leave. The opposite party claimed …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Vinod Kumar Verma and another against the State of U.P. and another. The counsel for the applicants, Babu Lal Ram, Kamalesh Kumar Nishad, Om Prakash Singh, and Renu Singh, were listed, but none appeared before the court on …
Virendra Patel filed a revision petition challenging a Family Court order that awarded his wife maintenance of Rs 5,000 per month under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He does not dispute the amount but seeks the court’s permission to pay the arrears of approximately Rs 2,40,000 in …
The applicant, Aditya Narayan Srivastav, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The application was to be heard before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No counsel or party appeared to press the application before the court. Consequently, the …
The appellants appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the Special Judge’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged caste‑based assault, robbery and humiliation of the …
The petitioner, Amarjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, 2023. He alleged that he was falsely implicated by an informant following a disturbance where a crowd attacked police and seized liquor, and …
Ramchal Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under sections 274, 275, 132, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that the case diary and his criminal antecedent report had not been produced, that he was …
The petitioner, Dharo Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and (d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and fermented fruit. He argued that the case diary and his …
The petitioner, Ahmad Hussain, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of a Deputy Collector’s order dated 12 July 2024 directing measurement and removal of illegal encroachment on his land, as well as setting aside a later mutation order that cancelled his earlier favorable mutation. The petition …
The petitioner, Vivek Ranjan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where the FIR alleges he induced an informant to invest Rs 50 lakhs in a financial scheme and failed to repay, amounting to alleged cheating. The petitioner contended that he merely acted as a broker for a builder and that the …
The petitioners, Samir Nath Jha and his wife, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where an informant alleged that they received Rs 6.20 lakh for a land transaction that was never completed and the amount was not returned. The petitioners contended that the matter is a civil monetary dispute and …
The petitioners, two brothers, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 504, 379, 506 and 34 of the IPC, including assault with an iron rod, theft of Rs 5 lacs and a mobile phone, and threats. They argued that they have clean antecedents, …
The petitioners, Sit Kumar Mandal and Pramod Mandal, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09-04-2018 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Banmankhi, Purnia in connection with Case No.26M of 2018. The petitioners …
The petitioner, Dhananjay Sah, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 87.51 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not …
The petitioner, Mukkadar Paswan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 01.02.2018 that had framed a charge of rape under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code against him. The order was originally passed by the …
Petitioners Randhir Kumar Singh and Shailendra Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 17-10-2017 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 341 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section …
The petitioner, Md. Shahabuddin, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 323 and 376 of the IPC, alleging he raped the informant, his wife, by falsely promising marriage. He argued that the victim was over 18 years old at the time, as shown by her school transfer certificate, and that they …
Petitioner Bhola Paswan filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12 July 2018 passed by the Additional District Judge VII, Aurangabad, in connection with Sessions Trial No.256 of 2017. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Md. Suleman Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 39 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Bhulla Kumar Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the preparation of dacoity under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that no incriminating material was recovered from him and …
The petitioner, Poonam Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged possession of 5 litres of liquor recovered near her verandah. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Dhanji Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 77.760 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from an auto. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for allegedly possessing 9 litres of liquor recovered from Roushan Kumar. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no …
The trial court convicted Fauzdar Yadav under Sections 325, 452 and 323 of the IPC based on the testimony of the victim’s wife, son and a neighbour, and medical evidence of a head injury, sentencing him to seven years’ rigorous imprisonment. The appellant challenged the conviction in a criminal …
The petitioner, Md Nazir Khan, was named in a 2016 complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty under Section 498‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, stemming from a dowry demand for a motorcycle and Rs 1 lakh. The complainant claimed she was ousted from the matrimonial …
The petitioner, Lalan Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act, arising from a land‑dispute‑related gun‑fire incident. The police recovered a country‑made pistol and live cartridges from the open roof of his house, but the petitioner claimed he …
Jayram Mandal was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Ladaniya Case No. 375 of 2024) alleged under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution claimed he lured a girl and kidnapped her, while the petitioner asserted his innocence and highlighted his clean …
The appellants MD Mausam and the late MD Naushad were convicted under Sections 25(1‑AA) and 26(2) of the Arms Act for allegedly operating a mini‑gun factory at their house, based on a police raid and seizure of pistols and manufacturing equipment. The prosecution’s case relied solely on police …
The case arose from a 2002 assault in which the deceased, Jung Bahadur Singh, was attacked by Faujadar Yadav with a khanti, later dying from head injuries. The trial court convicted Yadav under Sections 325, 452 and 323 of the IPC, sentencing him to seven years’ rigorous imprisonment. The appellant …
The petitioner, Md Imran Shaikh, was named in a 2018 complaint alleging offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act, based on alleged mental and physical cruelty when the complainant's parents refused to pay Rs 1 lakh. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the complaint lacked …
Dauly Devi, the wife of Kamlesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after a police case (Excise P.S. Case No. 229 of 2026) alleged that 26.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a scooty she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware …
The petitioner, Ankit Maharaj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 9.9 litres of liquor from a third‑party's hut. He …
The petitioner, Md. Munaaf, was named in an FIR for alleged violations of Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, based solely on the disclosure of a co‑accused who claimed the petitioner was involved in a theft and possession of a country‑made pistol and cartridges. The petitioner contended …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Yadav, was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and his family with a khanti and iron rod during a land dispute. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the FIR incorrectly attributed the khanti blow to him, and that the informant’s re‑statement and NCCT report showed …
Petitioner Raj Lal Yadav, owner of a vehicle from which 225 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at …
The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 38 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that a friend misused his vehicle. The State opposed his request …
The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a sugarcane field. The petitioner argued that he was not …
The petitioner, Chinta Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 125 litres of liquor from a kitchen behind her house. She argued that the liquor was not in her possession, that the location did not belong …
Petitioner Rajesh Manjhi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing two litres of liquor recovered from a field that he does not own. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and the police …
Dharmendra Yadav was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 585 litres of liquor concealed under straw. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery site did not belong to him. …
The petitioner, Badhiya Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from her residence. The petitioner argued that the liquor was found in a joint family …
Sunil Kumar Mukhiya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the …
The petitioner, director of Arena Agro Industries, entered into a rice‑milling agreement with the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation (BSFCSC) and received paddy but delivered only a fraction of the required custom‑milled rice, leading to a loss of about Rs 5 crore. He was charged under …
The petitioners (the in‑laws of the complainant) filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 CrPC seeking to set aside the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate’s order of cognizance dated 07‑06‑2014 in a dowry‑related case. The complainant, the wife of petitioner‑1, alleged dowry …
The petitioner, Virendra Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 05.02.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in a criminal revision case. The trial court reported that the trial was pending for defence …
Navin Kumar was charged by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, under Sections 406, 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the magistrate's order dated 28‑11‑2016. The petitioner …
The petitioners, heirs of the late Sokhi Pandit, claimed ownership of land in Madhepura district and alleged that respondent No.8 obtained a Basgit Parcha in his wife's name through forgery and collusion with a Circle Officer. They challenged the Collector's order of 5 January 2019, which upheld the …
Manoj Singh was implicated in an excise case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 2769.120 litres of liquor. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a location adjacent to his shop and that he was not arrested at the spot, …
Shyama Devi, an elderly widow, claimed possession of two parcels of land inherited from her father and cultivated them for her livelihood. The District Institute of Education and Training (DIET) asserted that the land formed part of its campus and had been in its possession, leading to a dispute. …
The petitioner, Anil Lal Bhai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint case involving offences under Sections 409, 420 and 120B of the IPC. The State and the complainant opposed the bail, contending that a proceeding under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. had already been initiated against …
The petitioners, Rohit Kumar and Anjan Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 30.240 litres of liquor from a house that does not belong to them. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, no liquor …
The appellants Manju Devi, Rohit Kumar and Abhishek Kumar appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a trial court order refusing anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, caste‑based abuse and theft of a mangalsutra. They contended that the FIR …
Ravindra Yadav appealed against the order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge that rejected his anticipatory bail application in a case involving multiple IPC offences and violations of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He argued that he has a clean record, was falsely implicated, …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was arrested on 3 June 2025 in connection with a 2018 case (PS Bahadurpur Case No. 41) alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution contends that the petitioner, along with …
Rohit Mukhiya, facing charges under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 506 and 34 of the IPC, applied for anticipatory bail after a prior application was withdrawn under Section 41(1)(b) of the CrPC. The dispute is matrimonial; he is the husband of Rita Kumari, with whom the relationship has broken down and a …
The petitioner, Md Sadakat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Araria Mahila PS Case No. 60 of 2024) involving offences under several sections of the BNS. He had earlier filed for anticipatory bail which was withdrawn after a notice under Section 35 of the BNSS, and a …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court referred to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which held that a …
The appellant, Sahjanand Hareshbhai Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, citing its recent decision in …
The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referring to its recent decision in Shivsinh …
The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to its recent decision …
The appellant, Bharatsang Bhagwansang Jadeja, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed to the High Court under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against an acquittal by the trial court. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …
The appellant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …
The appellant, Gujarat State Co‑operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd., filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court …
The appellant, Sureshkumar Prabhuram Thakkar, filed an appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined a recent precedent (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat) …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, citing its recent decision in …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether, as a victim, the complainant could appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 BNSS or must use the victim‑specific remedy under the …
The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision …
The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal …
Arvind Ashwinkumar Trivedi filed revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 07‑11‑2023 of the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, which rejected his request to accept a 20% deposit of a cheque amount as condition for bail. The coordinate …
Arvind Ashwinkumar Trivedi filed revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 07‑11‑2023 of the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, which rejected his request to accept a 20% deposit of a cheque amount as condition for bail. The coordinate …
Arvind Ashwinkumar Trivedi filed revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 07‑11‑2023 of the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, which rejected his request to accept a 20% deposit of a cheque amount as condition for bail. The coordinate …
Arvind Ashwinkumar Trivedi filed revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 07‑11‑2023 of the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, which rejected his request to accept a 20% deposit of a cheque amount as condition for bail. The coordinate …
The applicant, Yogesh Kailas Jadhav, sought bail and suspension of his life sentence under Section 415 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pending appeal against a conviction for murder and related offences. The trial court had found him guilty of IPC sections 302, 323, 498A, 504 and …
The appellants, Shanker Lal and Har Govind, were convicted under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 325 and sentenced to up to two years' rigorous imprisonment. They sought relief on the ground that, given the non‑serious nature of the offences, lack of prior convictions and the considerable delay since …
The appellant, Bharat Singh, was convicted by a Sessions Court in 1987 for offences under Sections 148, 149 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to a total of two years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, not contesting the conviction, but seeking the benefit of probation under Section 4 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 24‑01‑2024 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant alleged that he never issued a cheque for a Rs.7,00,000 loan and that the proceeding was a malicious …
The applicant, Shyam Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant later expressed a desire to withdraw the application and sought liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. The Court considered …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance taken by the Judicial Magistrate in a case alleging offences under several IPC sections arising from a village election dispute. The State argued that the FIR, …
The applicant, Sadrun Nisha, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The issue before the court was whether the application could be entertained in the absence of any …
The petitioners, eight villagers from Karanj, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes for allegedly assaulting an informant, stealing her gold earring and attempting to outrage her modesty. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and that the FIR …
The petitioners, Shivan Ray and Lalit Ray, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS‑452/2025) alleging assault on the informant’s father during a land‑dispute scuffle. The FIR listed several offences under the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023, including sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2) and others. …
The petitioner, Govind Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Indian Penal Code alleging kidnapping and abduction of the informant's daughter. He claimed a clean record, asserted that the victim voluntarily eloped, and alleged false implication …
The petitioner, Raja Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 14.92 litres of liquor were recovered from a vehicle owned by Sheikh Nasiruddin, not from the petitioner. He argued he had no …
The petitioners applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No. 164/2024) involving alleged assault with firearms and other offences under the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that the petitioners, along with others, attacked an Airtel employee, causing head injuries and …
The petitioners, Md. Muktar Sekh and Rocky Sk, feared arrest in connection with a case where 55 cows were seized and they were charged under sections 303(2), 317(5), 317(2), 3(5) of the BNS and sections 11(a), (d), (e), (f) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. They argued that they …
Arvind Sah and Anand Kumar were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Cognizable Offences Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his mother in a land‑dispute. They contended that the incident was a spontaneous fight in self‑defence, resulting only in simple injuries, and asserted …
Petitioner Nikku Yadav, facing charges under Sections 304(B), 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, applied for pre‑arrest bail fearing imminent arrest. The State contended that the petitioner had been declared an absconder and that proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal Procedure …
The petitioners, three brothers, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to assault, theft and other offences arising from a land dispute. The State opposed the bail. The court examined the allegations, finding that Janardan Yadav was …
The petitioners, Ram Sogarath Bhagat and Ramadhar Bhagat, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault, robbery, and outraging the modesty of a woman arising from a land dispute in Madhuban, East Champaran. They applied for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail, claiming innocence, lack of any weapon …
Ramjee Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in a case arising from a 2005 incident where an informant alleged that Yadav and others, armed with firearms, shot at him and stole his watch. The FIR was lodged on 17‑04‑2005, but the police charge‑sheet of 2006 named …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He alleged that the alleged seizure of 2,181.57 litres of liquor and a …
The petitioner, Kailash Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly transporting 342 litres of liquor in his pick‑up vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession …
Vikesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging kidnapping, rape and offences under the POCSO Act involving a 16‑year‑old girl. The FIR was lodged 15 days after the alleged incident, and the petitioner claimed false implication. The victim’s statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. …
The petitioners, Subhash Kumar Paswan and Anil Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. They contended that …
The petitioner, Ramnath Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 70 litres of liquor from Baburbani Diyara Area. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …
The petitioners, a group of residents from Kanchanpur village, filed an application invoking Section 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code to raise certain grounds before the lower court at the stage of defence arguments. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought liberty to present these grounds, …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 168.48 litres of liquor from a car and a motorcycle registered in his name, under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a …
The petitioner, Rajji Khan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not …
The petitioner, Salman Gaddi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 30.6 litres of liquor recovered from an e‑rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …
Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging possession of 750 ml of liquor and seizure of his motorcycle. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal antecedent and claimed he was not arrested at the scene, arguing …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized liquor, and that …
Bullet Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging concealment of liquor in his fields. He argued that no liquor was recovered from his possession, the FIR omitted the informant's name, and that an …
Vivek Bharti applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was recovered from his possession, and the case was based solely on a …
The petitioner, Vikrama Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 196 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged recovery was from a …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of …
The petitioner, Dinanath Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an auto he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the driver misused his …
Ajay Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after being implicated in an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 542.4 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …
Kamlesh Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle from which 26 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that his friend had misused the vehicle. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record and argued that ownership …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was named in a complaint (Case No. 9288(c) of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 498A, 406 and 506 of the IPC for mental and physical cruelty linked to dowry demands. The petitioner contended that the complaint was false, filed by his wife Sonam Kumari, who no longer …
The petitioners, Pramod Yadav and Monu Kumar, were named in an FIR for offences including extortion, robbery and assault under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. They contended that the FIR did not contain any prima facie allegation against them, but only against other …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, was named in an FIR for offences under Section 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and several provisions of the Arms Act, based on the testimony of a co‑accused who was arrested. Kumar contended that he was not present at the scene and that his name was supplied …
The petitioners, Amit Kumar and Uday Yadav, were named in an FIR for multiple offences arising from a violent incident at the informant's house, allegedly linked to a land dispute. The FIR alleged that the petitioners, armed, assaulted the informant's family with iron rods, causing serious injuries …
The petitioners, three brothers from Lakhisarai, were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant with a rod, causing grievous injuries that required 32 stitches to the head and injuries to the left hand. They were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay …
Manish Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged assault, robbery and threats involving a pistol, under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes. He contended that the incident was an accident, the injuries were minor, and the case was false. The prosecution opposed bail. The court examined the …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was not named in the FIR relating to a theft of Rs.1,40,000 from a motorcycle dickey, but was implicated after a co‑accused, Raghav Pandey, was arrested based on CCTV footage and allegedly confessed the petitioner's involvement. The petitioner, who has criminal …
The petitioners, four brothers, were named in an FIR for allegedly destroying wheat crops belonging to an informant and issuing threats, under several offences of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the case stemmed from a land dispute and that the allegations were vague and …
Chandan Kumar Jaiswal was accused in a 2023 complaint under Section 498A of the IPC for alleged dowry‑related cruelty and retention of stridhan. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the complaint was not supported by an affidavit, contrary to the ratio in Priyanka Srivastava v. State of …
The petitioner, Dr. Parwez Akhtar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the FIR and all proceedings arising from a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court had taken cognizance and issued …
The petitioner, Sohit Paswan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of an FIR registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34, 498A, 494 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 24‑10‑2016 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 406, 417, 420, 421, 426, 463 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court, in a separate …
The appellants, four members of the Mahto family, were charged under multiple provisions of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged caste‑based assault and harassment on 15 July 2024. Their application for anticipatory bail was rejected by the Special …
The petitioner, Nagendra Sahani, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of a 1982 land purchase order and subsequent letters issued by various officials of the Bihar government concerning the allotment of land for rehabilitation under the Bagmati Project. The petition alleged that the purchase …
The petitioner, Govind Kumar Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in offences under Sections 420, 120(B), 468, 471, 494 and 34 of the IPC, based on a complaint by an informant who claimed Thakur had married the informant's wife Mala without a divorce and …
The petitioner, Divesh Kumar Sharma, a Railway Inspector, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have participated in a shooting that resulted in the death of Renu Devi. The police, after …
The petitioner, Sheikh Aliyas, a 69‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, was implicated in a murder case under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based on an informant’s allegation that he ordered a relative to strangle the informant’s mother‑in‑law. The petitioner contended that the informant …
Nagendra Kumar, a government teacher, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a shooting incident during a Holi dispute. He contended that the informant falsely implicated him and that the police investigation …
The petition was filed by a 17‑year‑old child in conflict with law (CCL) through his mother under Section 102 read with Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, seeking regular bail in a murder case arising from a family dispute. The trial court had convicted …
The applicant, Balvantji Chamanji Thakor, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the 6th Additional Civil Judge, Mahesana, and the conviction was affirmed by the Sessions Judge. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the …
The applicant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year imprisonment and a fine. After the conviction was upheld by the Sessions Court, the applicant filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC, seeking to quash the judgment and obtain …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Shishupal Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) in a land‑fraud case. The applicant argued that he was merely the purchaser of the land, had paid full …
The applicant, Srikant Pandey, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the order of the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Jaunpur dated 02‑11‑2020, which had rejected his discharge application in a criminal case under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the …
Ashok Kumar filed a revision petition challenging the dismissal of his Section 239 Cr.P.C discharge application in a criminal case involving alleged forgery, fraud, and conspiracy under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B. The petitioner argued that he was implicated only because he is the …
The revisionist Sandeep Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Special Judge that rejected his application for release of a seized vehicle. The trial court had dismissed the application under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it was not filed by the vehicle’s …
Petitioner Raju filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 8 December 2025, which dismissed his complaint under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court examined whether it could entertain the revision …
The petitioners filed a revision against the Judicial Magistrate's order dismissing their discharge application under Section 245(2) of the Cr.P.C. The High Court noted that revision jurisdiction is concurrent with the Sessions Court but ordinarily requires the litigant to approach the Sessions …
Petitioner Rajendra Kumar Sharma filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, which dismissed his application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code for registration of an FIR. The High Court examined whether it …
The applicant, Gaurav Kumar Gupta, challenged a summoning order dated 27‑01‑2025 that named him as an accused under Sections 406, 504 and 506 IPC in a complaint filed by a business associate over an alleged unpaid debt of Rs 4,17,030. The applicant argued that the complaint lacked the essential …
The appellants challenged the summoning order dated 19‑07‑2025 and the Special Sessions Trial proceedings, alleging that the FIR initially described a simple assault and later was altered to include caste‑based allegations without any supporting evidence. They argued that the informant’s statements …
The petitioner alleged that his brother fabricated a forged mortgage deed on a ten‑rupee stamp paper after their father's death, purportedly to obtain illegal possession of agricultural land. He filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a police FIR, which the …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 10‑07‑2019 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 406 IPC. The complaint alleged that the applicants had misappropriated money given by the complainant for …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS filed by Nitin Choudhary, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 379, 34, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, citing two earlier police closure reports and contradictory forensic …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 20‑07‑2018 issued by Judicial Magistrate‑I, Gorakhpur, and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 1050 of 2017) for offences under Sections 323, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. The dispute arose from …
Ravindra Kumar appealed his conviction and three‑year rigorous imprisonment under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He sought release on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, arguing that the offence carried a maximum sentence of two years and that he had no …
The applicants Salman Khan, Gulshan Khan, Irfan Khan and Nikhat Khan filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons in a criminal case alleging dowry harassment, cruelty and assault under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 307, alleging that the parties had reached an amicable compromise verified by the magistrate. Both sides admitted the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Rajat, who is charged under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 333 and 140(3) BNS for the death of his sister‑in‑law. The applicant claimed the incident was an accident that occurred during a family dispute, asserting that he …
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a criminal revision filed by Inaam Illahi challenging a Family Court order that granted maintenance of Rs.5,000 per month to his wife and Rs.2,000 per month to their minor daughter under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The husband claimed poverty, …
The applicants Lakhan Singh and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 131, 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The parties had amicably settled the …
The applicant Vinay Pratap filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared for the applicant and the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. …
Munni Devi appealed against an order dated 22‑07‑2025 that initiated forfeiture proceedings under Section 446 of the CrPC against her as surety for accused Liyaqat Ali. The accused had failed to appear, leading to non‑bailable warrants, but later surrendered on 13‑10‑2025 and was taken into custody. …
The applicants, including Shabab, were charged in a criminal case under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 313 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a complaint by the wife of Shabab. After investigation and framing of charges, the parties reached an out‑of‑court settlement on …
Puneet @ Nanne, accused of double murder under IPC sections 452, 307, 302 and 325, had been in custody since October 2022. His first bail plea was rejected, but he filed a second application arguing lack of criminal history, that only five of eighteen prosecution witnesses had been examined, and …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4887 of 2019) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 307, 328 and 354 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise dated 16 October 2021, which was verified by the trial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 20 of 2020 (Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC) on the ground that they had entered into a fresh compromise deed dated 9 April 2026, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial …
The appellant was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly assaulting and abusing a Scheduled Caste woman in an agricultural field at night. The appellant contended that the "public view" element required by Section …
The revisionists, Smt. Urmila Yadav and another, filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 26‑09‑2023 that denied their claim for arrears of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. They argued that a 17‑02‑2022 High Court direction to adjust amounts already paid should extend …
Ramraj filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that granted his wife Rs 4,000 per month as maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. He contended that the trial court failed to frame any issue or make a finding on the wife’s alleged unchastity, which is a statutory bar to …
The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 285 of 2025, alleging their involvement based on the FIR under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The police had already …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4999 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 325, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise on 28 January 2026, and the trial court …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Rajveer and seven others seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4280 of 2025) relating to offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325, 352, 504 and 506. The applicants asserted …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 511 of 2021) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise on 21 August 2025, which was verified by …
The petitioner, Sanjivani Vikash Foundation, sought direction from the Patna High Court regarding the failure to file a charge‑sheet against an accused named Mohit Vijaraniya in FIR No. 933/2023. The opposite parties contended that a charge‑sheet had already been filed against two other accused and …
Mukesh Pandit filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of a series of orders issued by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, which included a bailable warrant, a non‑bailable warrant, proclamation under Section 82 and attachment under Section 83, ultimately …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 354, 307, 427, 337, 379, 34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the chest of Pankaj Kumar. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the injury was …
