Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 6201–6400
The appellant Bhajan Paswan filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.531 of 2012 against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the court was informed by a police letter that the sole appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 …
The petitioner, Sonu Kushwaha, sought provisional bail fearing arrest in a case (Piparasi P.S. Case No. 70 of 2022, Tr. No. 2873 of 2025) involving alleged defalcation of Rs. 8,75,000 under IPC sections 420, 409 and 34. The prosecution alleged his participation in the fraud, while the petitioner …
The petitioner, Ayub Ansari, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber‑fraud case (Motihari Cyber P.S. Case No.57 of 2025) involving offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that a police raid on …
Anurag Kumar, a student of Chandi Engineering College, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Chandi P.S. No.545 of 2025) concerning a protest that allegedly turned violent following a girl’s death. The prosecution alleged his participation in offences under multiple …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR or in the victim's statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., and that the …
The petitioner, Prashant Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case (Majorganj P.S. Case No. 302 of 2022) for allegedly transporting approximately 1,164 litres of illicit liquor in a vehicle he owned, violating Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He contended that he had sold the …
The petitioner, Rahul Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that his motorcycle was seized with 27 litres of illicit country-made liquor in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not involved in the offence, having lent the motorcycle to …
The appellant, Naresh Yadav, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.288 of 1997 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter and report. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now Section 435 of the …
The petitioner, Sachit Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging kidnapping with intent to marry. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the victim’s statement, recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, was made under parental …
The petitioner, Upendra Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with an offence alleged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 20 litres of liquor and 2400 kg of semi‑prepared jawa mahua that were destroyed at a river bank. He …
The petitioner, Gulam Ansari, was arrested in March 2023 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 304B and 34 IPC) alleging that he, along with others, tortured and allegedly raped the informant’s daughter leading to her death. He contends that he is the devar of the deceased, has been …
Rohit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where he is accused, along with others, of abducting a minor girl, assaulting her, and uploading a video of the incident on social media. The prosecution alleges that the accused lured the girl, forced her, and disseminated the …
Mukul Prasad, the owner of a shop leased to Deepak Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking the release of the premises that had been seized by Excise authorities under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in connection with a case against the tenant. The petitioner argued that he was not an accused and …
Mahipat Hazra filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, and a death certificate was produced by the police. The court examined the provisions of Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the …
The appellant, Chandrika Paswan, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No. 694 of 2002 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Senior Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …
The petitioner, Mohan Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder‑conspiracy case (Gamhariya P.S. Case No. 44 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the IPC. He claimed innocence, asserting that the allegations against him were general, omnibus and …
The appellant, Janardan Mahto, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.786 of 2004 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter, an SHO report, and a death certificate issued by the Department of Economics & Statistics, Government of …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a poultry farm and a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, …
The appellants Bankey Choudhary, Sita Yadav and Ram Briksh Yadav were found to be deceased during the pendency of their criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a police report confirming their deaths. Under Section 394 of the Code …
The petitioner, Ramdayal Prasad, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2022 alleged that 15 litres of country-made liquor were recovered from a scooty belonging to co‑accused Dharmendra Prasad. The petitioner contended that his name …
The petitioners, five women related to Indradev Harait, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Khutauna PS Case No. 189 of 2025) alleging assault with a sharp weapon (dabiya) causing injuries to an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, participated …
The petitioners, Parvindra Singh and Raja Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 1633.92 litres of liquor were recovered from a Bolero pick‑up. They contended that they were not …
The petitioners, Manish, Shankar and Bilendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 83 litres of country‑made liquor near Ashopur Devi Temple. They contended that the seizure occurred in an …
The petitioner, Sangita Devi, a Pardanashin woman, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 77 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from a polythene bag allegedly thrown by her. She argued that the seizure was made in a …
The appellant, Ajodhi Sada, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the police reported that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, …
Tetri Devi, the petitioner, was named in FIR No. 489 of 2025 for alleged involvement in the assault and death of an informant's brother and the alleged theft of a gold chain. She contended that the FIR merely listed her at the end with a minor allegation of snatching a chain and that she has no …
Basudev Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,130.4 litres of liquor from a hut near his residence. He argued he had no conscious possession of the liquor, the hut did not belong to him, and the …
The petitioner, Govind Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 8.60 litres of country‑made liquor recovered from a motorcycle he was said to be driving. He contended that he was …
The petitioner, Prem Gupta, sought bail after a seizure of 1,950 kg of Mahua flowers from a house he claimed was a joint family property that he does not reside in. He argued that the seizure violated procedural requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code because the seizure list was not signed by …
The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged possession of 438.75 litres of liquor recovered from a godown not owned by him. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the recovery was made from …
The appellant Mahesh Sahni filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.603 of 2009 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police reported that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The petitioners, two women from Rohtas district, feared arrest for alleged violations of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after liquor was recovered from polythene bags they had discarded. They argued that the liquor was not in their possession, no independent …
The petitioners, Deepak Kumar Singh and Amit Kumar, were implicated in a robbery case (Lakri Nabiganj P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026) based solely on the confessional statement of co‑accused Suryabhan Prasad, with no other material linking them. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and …
The appellant, Bankey Rai, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.532 of 1997 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the court received a letter and police report confirming that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to …
The petitioners, Amit Yadav and Sibi Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 after 40 litres of country-made liquor were seized from an open area. They contended that the seizure was unrelated to them, that the …
The petitioner, Siko Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that 125 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from his house and that he fled the scene. The FIR named him based solely on identification by a local watchman, with no seizure of liquor from his personal …
Petitioners Kanti Devi, a woman, and Wakil Rai, an 80‑year‑old man, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault on an informant and his family. They contended that they were not named …
The appellant, Thakkan Sah, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No. 526 of 1996 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. The court examined the Superintendent’s letter and the police report confirming the death. Under Section …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He argued that he was not caught in possession of liquor, was not the owner of the seized motorcycle, and was implicated by a watchman with whom …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Saw, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 36 and 56(c) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from Pappu Singh's premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, had no …
The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and …
The petitioner, Abhishek Manjhi, sought bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after a FIR and seizure list indicated that 5 litres of country‑made liquor and 50 litres of raw material were recovered from an open area near his thatched house. He contended …
The petitioners, Shankar Paswan and Mithun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 395 of 2022, which involves offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners participated in an assault on an …
The petitioner, a 65‑year‑old mother‑in‑law, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case (Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025) where she was alleged to have participated in the killing of the informant’s daughter under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The …
The petitioner, Aman Kumar Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act after 1627.2 litres of foreign liquor were seized from a pick‑up van. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver, that the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 129.450 litres of country-made liquor, although the FIR named an unknown person and the petitioner was identified only as the driver, with no personal …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 320.4 litres of liquor from a sack on a cart. He argued that he was not in possession, was not the cart owner, and was …
Santosh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the illegal recovery of 786.660 litres of liquor from a wheat field, invoking Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he …
The petitioner, Chunnu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that 70.020 litres of foreign liquor were seized from a vehicle, and he was identified by a local watchman despite not owning or possessing the vehicle. The State opposed bail, citing three prior criminal cases, one of …
The petitioner, Radha Devi, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that 9.75 litres of liquor were recovered from her residence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. She contended that the seizure list lacked her family’s signature, there was no independent …
Krishna Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging assault on an informant and his family over a drainage dispute between pattidars. The FIR charges him under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for assault, including sections 126(2), …
The petitioner, Md. Sabab, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly having 38.7 litres of foreign liquor recovered from a bag on his motorcycle. He contended that the motorcycle had been handed over to a friend and that he had no …
Dipesh Kumar, the registered owner of a motorcycle from which 126 litres of Nepali liquor was seized, was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He contended that he had merely lent the bike to a neighbour and had no knowledge of the liquor being transported, and …
Vikash Kumar, the registered owner of a motorcycle from which 19 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 implicated a third party, Dablu Kumar, for using his vehicle. The petitioner argued that …
The Patna High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Jitendra Sahani, who was alleged to have been involved in the recovery of 47.5 litres of liquor and 2,500 litres of spirit from a house that is part of a joint family property. The petitioner, who has ten prior criminal …
The petitioner, Parwez Alam, a resident of Gayaji, is the registered owner of a tempo from which 145 litres of country‑made liquor was seized, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the tempo was being …
The petitioner, Anuj Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly delivering 85 litres of illicit liquor via a motorcycle. He contended that he had no connection to the vehicle or the liquor and that his name was supplied solely by …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that 60.16 litres of foreign liquor were recovered in front of his house, constituting an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (Amended) 2022. He argued that the seizure was made in an open, …
The petitioner, Chandra Shekhar Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a police seizure of 28 litres of country-made liquor from a motorcycle registered in his wife's name, alleged to be in violation of Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He argued that his …
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of country‑made liquor from beneath his gumti. The FIR named him based on the statement of a co‑accused, but no liquor was found in his …
Makurdhun Sah, the appellant in a criminal appeal, died during the pendency of the appeal. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a police report confirming the appellant's death, along with the death certificate issued by the Department of Planning and Development, Bihar. …
The appellant, Naresh Mahto, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.1211 of 2011 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the …
The petitioner, Shubhash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 123.75 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the …
Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and the allegation …
Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not found in his …
Dev Kumar, a resident of Begusarai, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 982.44 litres of liquor from a mini Tata truck. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, did not …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Ranjan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged recovery of 70.5 litres of liquor and offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he was not …
The petitioner, Ruman Ali, applied for anticipatory bail after the police seized 160 litres of liquor and two vehicles in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a location …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 120 litres of liquor from an auto near the Falgu River. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 351 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Rambabu Sahni, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 501 litres of liquor from a straw house belonging to Krishna Mohan. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor near the Punpun river. He contended that he was not arrested at the …
Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that …
The appellant, Bishwanath Mahto, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.373 of 2014 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the …
The appellants, Balesw ar Saw and his wife Sushila Devi, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.910 of 2014 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, a police letter and report revealed that both appellants had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …
The appellant, Rameshwar Yadav, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a police report confirming the death, along with the death certificate. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to …
The appellant, Rameshwar Chaudhary, filed a criminal appeal (Cr. App. DB No.692 of 2014) before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter and report. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …
The appellant, Kartik Sah, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The appellant, Ishwar Prasad, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal. The Superintendent of Police informed the court of his death. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), an appeal may be …
The petitioner, Vipin Kumar Ram, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 133.2 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another …
The appellants, three brothers named Suchit, Sudama, and Sidama Choudhary, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the police informed the court that all three appellants had died. The court examined the letter and report and applied Section 394 of the …
The appellant, Ram Naresh Singh, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, as reported by the Senior Superintendent of Police. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of …
The appellant, Saroj Sah, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No. 881 of 2013 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of …
The appellant, Sheo Murat Paswan, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.157 of 2003 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section …
The appellant, Ashok Gond, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.380 of 2000 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter and a death certificate. The Court examined whether the appeal could continue in the absence of a filing by any …
The appellants, Binay Jha and Bam Shankar Jha, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that both appellants had died. The Court examined the report and noted that, under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …
The Patna High Court heard three related bail applications arising from PS Case No. 385 of 2024 concerning an alleged breach of trust where the accused allegedly forged an agreement and took Rs. 66 lakh. The prosecution alleged that the informant demanded return of Rs. 26.4 lakh, which was not paid, …
The Patna High Court heard three bail applications arising from the same police case (Arwal PS Case No. 385 of 2024) involving alleged breach of trust where the accused allegedly forged an agreement and took Rs. 66,00,000. The prosecution alleged that the accused failed to return an advance amount …
The appellant, Kunti Devi, died during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No.61 of 2005 before the Patna High Court. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a police report confirming her death. The issue was whether the appeal could continue in the absence of the appellant …
The appellant, Karu Ram @ Suresh Ram, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya …
The appellant, Md Saif Shahid, was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged caste‑based abuse, demolition of a boundary wall, and extortion in a land dispute. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the …
The appellant, Laxman Yadav, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The appellant, Md. Saiyad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Araria, for dowry death under IPC Section 304B/34 and for causing disappearance of evidence under Section 201/34, receiving life imprisonment and a five‑year term. The prosecution relied on the statements of ten witnesses and …
The appellant, Ramashish Paswan, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police superintendent's letter and a sub‑inspector's report. The court examined whether the appeal could continue in the absence of the …
The appellant, Radha Kishun Chouhan, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter, an S.H.O. report, and a death certificate. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now mirrored …
The appellant, Md. Khurshid, was convicted by a Special POCSO Court for raping an eight‑year‑old girl, being sentenced to life imprisonment under IPC 376(i) and to rigorous imprisonment for offences under POCSO Sections 4, 8 and 12. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence – the victim’s …
The appellant, Teras Ram, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar and several co-accused. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter and a death certificate. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding …
The appellant, Raj Kishore Yadav, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.302 of 2013 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to …
The appellant, Bindeshwar Sah, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.328 of 2013 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter and a death certificate. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …
The appellant, Vijau Singh, died during the pendency of a criminal appeal (Cr. App. No.166 of 2012). The court examined a police letter and a death certificate confirming his death. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The appellant, Ravindra Manjhi, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.1007 of 2015 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police informed the court that the appellant had died. The court examined the letter from the Senior Superintendent of Police and the report of the …
The Patna High Court heard three bail applications arising from the same police case (Arwal PS Case No. 385 of 2024) involving alleged breach of trust where the accused allegedly forged an agreement and took Rs. 66,00,000. The prosecution alleged that the accused failed to return an advance amount …
The appellants Munna Yadav and Dilip Yadav were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Jageshwar Yadav under IPC sections 302 and 34, based primarily on the testimony of the deceased’s wife (PW‑7) and her son (PW‑4), who were alleged eye‑witnesses, and on medical evidence suggesting …
The petitioner, Shantanu Singh, was accused of fraudulently withdrawing large sums from a dormant bank account, with allegations involving Sections 419, 420, 467 and 471 of the IPC. He contended that he has a clean record and was falsely implicated, pointing out discrepancies in the name on the …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in 2026 for offences alleged in a 2004 complaint (IPC sections 323, 498A, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act section 3/4). The court questioned why bail was applied for after a twenty‑year gap since the complaint and alleged cognizance. Counsel misrepresented that …
The appellant, Shivsankar Pal, was charged with offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a disputed land sale in which the informant alleged fraud and caste-based assault. The appellant contended that the matter was essentially …
The applicants were charged under IPC sections 307, 201, 114 and Arms Act sections 3 and 25(1)(B)(A) for firing weapons in the air during a marriage procession. They filed a discharge application under Section 227 of the CrPC, contending that the alleged attempt to murder (Section 307) was not …
The husband appealed a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 50,000 per month as maintenance to his wife, who is suffering from cancer, under Section 125 of the CrPC. He claimed that his business had collapsed, his income was minimal and the interim maintenance of Rs 15,000 was arbitrarily …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar @ Peter Gangaram Patel, filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order dated 24‑Feb‑2026 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 9 of 2021. The High Court observed …
The complainant, Rajesh Laxman Gavade, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After the trial court’s acquittal, the applicant sought to withdraw the …
The applicant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed a Section 378(4) CrPC application seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of the accused. After the Gujarat High Court’s recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which affirmed the …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The …
The appellant, Saikrupa Mahila Co.Op.Credit Society, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent …
The heirs of the deceased litigant, convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act for a cheque‑bounce offence, filed criminal revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash the convictions. The original complainant settled the dispute, filed an affidavit confirming …
The appellant filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. Relying on a recent decision of …
The complainant filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondents, who were acquitted by the trial court. The complainant appealed the acquittal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondent on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …
The petitioners filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioners sought transfer of the appeal to the Sessions Court, relying on a recent …
The appellant Harshal Indravadan Patel filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court. The Court referred to …
The Sanjari Co-operative Society Ltd filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the State under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High …
The applicant, Manshan Engineering Pvt. Ltd., was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year imprisonment, a conviction later affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. The parties subsequently settled the dispute, with the complainant consenting to …
The High Court of Gujarat entertained a criminal revision application filed by Manshan Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and another against their conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had resulted in a one‑year simple imprisonment and was affirmed by the Additional Sessions …
The appellant, Deepu Kumar, was charged under several IPC provisions and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting, caste‑abhorrently abusing, and robbing the informant on 22 July 2025. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. On …
The petitioners, Arun Kumar and Dinesh Kumar, were arrested after police seized 35 litres of illicit liquor from motorcycles and alleged they were freed by a mob. They claimed they were falsely implicated due to personal enmity and had no involvement with the liquor or motorcycles. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Kunti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR alleging assault and theft of a gold chain, invoking sections 341, 323, 307, 354B, 379, 504 and 34 of the IPC. She contended that the FIR contained only a vague, omnibus accusation and that she had no specific overt act …
The petitioners, three residents of Chhatauni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (B.N.S.) and the Arms Act. The State and the informant opposed the bail, arguing that proceedings under Section 82 of the Criminal …
The appellant, Ranshu Kumar, was charged with murder under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Naxal Suppression Act, 2023 and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He sought regular bail, but the Additional Sessions Judge refused it, …
The petitioner, Rakesh Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a motorcycle he owned and a house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his immediate possession and that …
Kumar Gaurav filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 28-08-2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali. During the hearing on 23-04-2026, the petitioner expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the …
The appellants, Nagendra Kumar Sahi and Rahul Kumar Sahi, were charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case registered in 2022. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge. On appeal, …
The petitioners, Arvind Singh and Mukesh Yadav, were implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor and raw material. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the alleged contraband was recovered …
The petitioners, four relatives from Jallahare Rampur, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 293 of 2025 alleging assault under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. One petitioner, Lalchand Singh, was arrested during the pendency, …
The petitioners Nibha Devi, Kamlesh Sahni and Mahesh Sahni were named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the death of an informant's married daughter, purportedly over a dowry demand of Rs. 1 lakh, under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the BNS. They contended that the deceased was living in her parental …
Manish Kumar was facing arrest in a case where an FIR alleged his involvement in a fraudulent money transfer, charging him under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, the FIR was filed more than three months after the alleged incident without any explanation, and …
The petitioner, Ram Bahadur Ray, was named in an FIR for alleged firing on an informant and others following a motorcycle accident on 09.01.2026, with charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale and Settlement Act (BNSS). The petitioner’s counsel argued that no injuries were …
Shivam Das, the owner of a motorcycle from which 750 ml of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, claiming he was not present at the spot of seizure and was unaware of his friend’s alleged misuse of the vehicle. The …
The petitioner, Laxman Mandal, was named in an FIR for allegedly pelting stones at police officers while they attempted to seize a jute bag containing wine bottles at Lailakh Mamalkha Railway Station. The petition argued that the allegations were vague, general and omnibus, and that the injury …
Petitioners Rajesh Kumar and Ashok Mahto were named in an FIR for offences including kidnapping, extortion, and assault under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS). The FIR alleged a ransom demand of Rs.5,000 and that the petitioners were armed with pistols. The petitioners argued …
The petitioners – Wakil Sahani, Mukhtar Sahani and Girja Sahani – were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and others with a rod and a sharp‑edged weapon, allegedly with intent to cause death, under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. They applied for anticipatory bail, …
The petitioner, Pawan Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 300 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Upendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 111(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 750 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 360ml of liquor in a Honda City. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in actual …
The petitioners, Deep Narayan Yadav and Bhim Kumar, were named in an FIR for assault, outraging modesty, and theft under several IPC sections. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations were false, the incident was a free‑fight, and they have clean antecedents. The State …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a ghat. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 197.280 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a vacant premises not owned by him. He argued that the allegation was based …
The petitioner, Ramakant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from a vehicle he owned but that he was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest. He argued that …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 6.6 litres of liquor from a location not under his control. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor …
The petitioners, three Yadav brothers, applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from several motorcycles. Petitioners 1 and 3 argued they were not in possession …
The petitioner, Ramchandra Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a public bridge area and 102 …
The petitioner, Abdhesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8.250 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, …
The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 413.840 litres of liquor from a bush. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Sachin Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 512.460 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the vehicle's owner, and that the …
The petitioner, Samol Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing three litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware …
The petitioner, Santosh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 60 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, …
Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 120 litres of liquor were recovered from his auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had …
The petitioner, Karan Kumar Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 24.99 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not the owner of the vehicle, …
The petitioner, Dhrup Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 33.6 litres of liquor from a field belonging to another person. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Surendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 62 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the liquor, was not the …
Pappu Kumar was accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 3.420 litres of liquor recovered from his meat shop. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the police investigation …
The petitioners sought quashing of a criminal proceeding under Section 145 of the Cr.P.C. that had been converted from an earlier Section 144 proceeding concerning a land dispute. The High Court noted that the same parties and subject matter had already been dealt with in earlier Section 144 …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 889.920 litres of liquor from a truck. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized goods, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Nut, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was …
The petitioners, Sikendra Yadav and his son Pankaj Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilawe River. They argued they have no prior …
The petitioner, Bablu Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a)(d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and mahua. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no contraband was …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 9.36 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Govind Saw, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 23.6 litres of liquor from a public place behind a temple. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested …
The petitioner, Saroj Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the …
Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 53.75 litres of liquor from a public place. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the …
Manoj Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 12 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession and that the complaint was motivated by an …
The petitioner, Shashi Ranjan Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle near the Dumri River. He contended that he had no prior criminal record, was …
The petitioner, Rohan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 after 14.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in his vehicle and that the actual …
The petitioner, Bhola Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …
Khushbu Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 125 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles, one of which she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …
The petitioner, Binod Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 69.6 litres of liquor from a cowshed adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued …
The petitioner, Alok Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7.875 litres of liquor from a toilet roof adjacent to his house. The petitioner asserted …
The petitioner, Vivek Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 680 litres of spirit from a Maruti car, which he did not own and from which nothing was found in his conscious possession. He pleaded …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Bharti, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from the house of Sarup Lal Pandit. He argued that he had no …
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 58.25 litres of liquor from an under‑construction house belonging to his father. He argued that no liquor …
The petitioner, Arvind Patel, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 13.92 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged recovery was from a public place, not in his possession, and that the police relied on secret …
Petitioner Bablu Dom was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 44.9 litres of liquor from a location that does not belong to him. He was not arrested at the spot and no liquor was found in his possession. The petitioner, claiming …
The petitioner Alok Kumar was charged under Section 498A IPC based on a complaint by his wife alleging dowry demand and cruelty. The trial court, after a Section 202 inquiry, took cognizance and issued summons. The petitioner filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking quashal, arguing that the …
The petitioner, Gopal Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 62.625 litres of liquor from his auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Kumar, a railway employee, filed a contempt application alleging that senior security officials of the Railway Protection Force (RPF) refused to grant him the benefit under Section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code, thereby violating Supreme Court guidelines laid down …
The petitioner, Yashin Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a May 15, 2012 order of the Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 498(A) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the process under these sections had already been issued and executed, and that the petitioner intended to surrender to the …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging dowry harassment and assault under IPC Sections 498A and 323. Mediation efforts had failed, and the prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded dowry and subjected his wife to cruelty. The petitioner denied the …
Dilip Kumar applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS‑380/2025) alleging land fraud involving forged identity documents and threats. The FIR alleges that the accused induced the informant to purchase land, paid most of the consideration in cash, and used forged documents. The petitioner contended …
The petitioner filed a criminal revision application challenging his conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the Sessions Court. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the complainant …
The applicants, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, were ordered a non‑bailable warrant for surrender. They filed a revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking conversion of the warrant to a bailable one so that they could …
The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80% of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaining 20% …
The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications (R/CR.RA/1163‑1170 of 2026) arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80 % of the compensation to the complainant and …
The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications (R/CR.RA/1163‑1170 of 2026) arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80 % of the compensation to the complainant and …
The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications (R/CR.RA/1163‑1170 of 2026) arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80 % of the compensation to the complainant and …
The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80% of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaining 20% …
The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications (R/CR.RA/1163‑1170 of 2026) arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80 % of the compensation to the complainant and …
The High Court of Gujarat considered several criminal revision applications arising from convictions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, where the appellate court had imposed a condition that the accused pay 80% of the compensation to the complainant and deposit the remaining 20% …
The appellant Kamta Singh was convicted by a Sessions Court for assaulting Sukhdev Singh, resulting in injuries that could have led to culpable homicide, under Section 308 IPC and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence, including eyewitness …
The petitioners Yash Pandey and others, who are accused in Complaint Case No.6433 of 2023 (Shivam Pandey v. Yash Pandey), filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 352, 504 and 506 IPC. The complaint alleged that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 05.10.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 17.10.2025, and the entire criminal proceedings of Session Trial No.805 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 74 …
The applicants, Vinod Kumar Gupta and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Criminal Case No.569 of 2016, which arose from a 2015 offence under Sections 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed that they had reconciled …
