Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 6401–6600
The applicant Yogendra Singh filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 289 of 2023) arising from an FIR lodged on 24-10-2022 alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust in relation to a tractor rented in 2011. The charge sheet under Section 406 …
The petitioners, Naseem Bux and two others, were accused in Criminal Case No. 252 of 2000 and were transferred to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) at Lalitpur by a High Court order dated 13‑08‑2004, which directed that the case be treated as an inquiry proceeding. The CJM later dismissed …
Murtuza filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that parties had illegally occupied his land and assaulted his minor daughter. The Additional District and Sessions Judge treated the 156(3) application as a complaint, dismissed it, and ordered a statement …
The revisionist Murtaza filed a criminal revision under sections 397/401 CrPC against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge POCSO) dated 30‑09‑2024, which dismissed his complaint under section 203 CrPC for non‑appearance. He alleged that the trial court dismissed the complaint …
The applicant, Kushvendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an interim maintenance order of Rs.7,500 per month granted by the Meerut Family Court in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. case. He alleged that the opposite party, his alleged wife, had fabricated a marriage …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court noted the absence of …
The petitioners, Aslam Khan and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 6824 of 2017) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter, originally filed in 2017, was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on 28 January …
The petitioner, Bittu Sharma, was implicated in a case registered under IPC sections 363, 365 and 34 for allegedly luring a 17‑year‑old girl and failing to return her. The petitioner claimed innocence, highlighting a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and asserting that the girl voluntarily accompanied …
Petitioner Md. Mukhtar Ansari applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 142/2024) alleging rape of a 13‑year‑old girl and other offences under IPC sections 376, 323, 342, 504, 506, 34 and POCSO Act section 4. The prosecution claims the petitioner raped the informant’s minor …
Jagar Nath Rai was accused in Bheldi Police Station Case No. 205 of 2025 for assaulting an informant and her son, causing simple head injuries, under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that the injuries were minor, seeking pre‑arrest bail. The …
The petitioners, five members of the Paswan family, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. During the pendency of the bail application, the parties reached a compromise, documented by a jointly signed compromise …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Bela P.S. Case No. 113 of 2020) alleging kidnapping of a minor under IPC sections 365, 366, 366A and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, abducted the informant’s …
The appellant, Sitaram Mahto, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting a child and using caste-based slurs. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act, arguing that he has a clean record, the FIR was filed …
The petitioner, Wasim Ahmad, was charged under IPC sections 420, 504 and 506 for allegedly cheating Ranjeet Kumar of Rs 5 lakh in a purported vehicle purchase. The informant claimed he paid Rs 2.5 lakh each, but the vehicle was never delivered and the money was not returned. The petitioner denied …
The petitioner, Surendra Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Thakraha P.S. Case No. 74 of 2023) involving alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where police seized 16.4 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was merely the …
The petitioner, Bablu Patel, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where a nurse alleged that he caught her, attempted to outrage her modesty and tore her clothes, constituting offences under Sections 354(b) and 323 of the IPC. The petitioner claimed he had been granted the privilege of Section …
The petition, Pooja Tiwari, a sister‑in‑law of the deceased, sought anticipatory bail in a case where the FIR alleged that she, along with co‑accused, set the deceased on fire over dowry demands, leading to her death. The petitioner contended that the fire was accidental, the FIR was lodged after …
The petitioner, Sandesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,200 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He claimed he was not in possession of …
The petitioner, Umal Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 180 litres of liquor from his …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS Case No. 30 of 2026) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the recovery of 99 litres of foreign liquor from a tempo. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to police enmity and that …
The petitioner, Jayprakash Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 206.58 litres of liquor from a jointly …
The petitioner, Ram Sabad Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a FIR (Kesariya P.S. Case No. 364 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault in a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant’s husband …
The petitioner, Sourav Kumar, aged about 20, was charged under IPC sections 363, 366A and 34 for allegedly kidnapping the informant's daughter with the intention of marrying her. The victim later gave a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. indicating she had gone to Haryana of her own free …
The petitioners, Markande Singh and Chunnu Singh, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 352, 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, arising from a land‑registration dispute that led to alleged assault on the informant’s family. The FIR alleged that after the death of …
Rahul Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle seized in an Excise case (PS No. 443 of 2025) for carrying Nepali foreign liquor, applied for anticipatory bail. He claimed he was not present at the spot of seizure, had given the bike in good faith to co‑accused Sudhir Kumar for medical reasons, and had no …
The petitioners, three women, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 143, 447, 341, 323, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code relating to an alleged assault on 17 May 2022. Their counsel argued that they have clean antecedents, are falsely implicated, and that the FIR …
The petitioners, Tuntun Sah and Jamdar Sah, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 46 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 307 and 302 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that a dispute over a parked motorcycle led to an assault on the …
Petitioners Purushottam Sah and Mantosh Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where police seized 17 litres of mahua from a two-wheeler. They contended they were not owners of the vehicle and were implicated solely …
The case arose from an alleged acid attack on two sisters, Soni and Afsari Parveen, at Akbarpur village in September 2015. The prosecution alleged that Md Ahsan Alam and Md Amir Hassan entered the house, threw acid on the victims, and were convicted under IPC sections 326A, 307, 458 and 354, among …
The petitioner, Govind Nandan, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act (amended 2022) alleging consumption of alcohol and possession of wine. The petitioner argued that he had no criminal antecedent and was merely present …
Sarfaraz Alam applied for pre‑arrest bail after being charged under several provisions of the Bihar Nativity and Security Act, 2023, corresponding IPC sections and Section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act for allegedly subjecting his informant, Chandtara Khatoon, to cruelty, refusing cohabitation and …
Bade Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging that 15 litres of liquor and 150 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua were recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that no …
The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 48 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for allegedly selling 36 litres of illicit liquor, based on information from an informant. He contended that no liquor was recovered from his possession, he has no criminal …
The petitioner, Ajay Chaudhary, was implicated in G.O. Case No.558 of 2015 for alleged offences under Section 47(A)(F) of the Excise Act, with police seizing 300 kg of illicit liquor. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, asserting that he is neither a licencee nor involved in the preparation of …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Sinha, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 35 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He claimed he was not present at the time of seizure and had merely lent …
The petitioner, Ajay Prasad, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, alleging his involvement in the seizure of 23.4 litres of foreign liquor. He contended that the two‑wheeler involved had been sold to another …
The petitioner, Ramesh Mahto, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a neighbour’s house, his own shop and a motorcycle. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Tarabul (Md. Jauwad), feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 813.5 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on a …
Petitioner Prashant Kumar applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 43.5 litres of liquor. He contended that he was not arrested, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he denied ownership of the hut where …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 25.92 litres of liquor at his cloth shop. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the liquor was …
Mithlesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor near a poultry farm and from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the …
The petitioners, a group of ten men from Malharia Tola, were charged in FIR No. 213 of 2025 for assault, outraging the modesty of female family members, and theft of gold ornaments, invoking multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and arguing …
The petitioner, Ramjeet Yadav, was implicated in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly transporting 531 litres of illicit liquor. He contended that he was merely the owner of the vehicle and had no knowledge of the contraband, and he had no prior criminal …
The petitioners, Gulab Paswan, Kundan Paswan, Rajani Devi and Ram Bilash Paswan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a murder case (PS Case No.103 of 2025) alleging they were falsely implicated in the killing of the informant's son. They contended that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that they …
The petitioner, Ratan Kumar, was apprehended for alleged possession of 10 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The prosecution claimed recovery of the liquor and cash, while the petitioner asserted innocence, no possession, and a …
The petitioner, Kaushal Yadav, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 250 litres of illicit liquor from an open pond. He claimed innocence, a clean criminal record, and argued that the liquor was …
Asharfi Mahto applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where 20 litres of country‑made liquor were recovered from an open area and he was charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he was falsely …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Ray applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Tilkeshwar P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026) alleging that six litres of foreign liquor were recovered from a motorcycle, constituting an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely …
The petitioner, Lala Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35.625 litres of foreign liquor from co‑accused Manish Kumar. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, had no involvement with …
The petitioner, a manager named Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 200 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, and …
Phoolbabu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4.455 litres of liquor from a poultry farm. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 162 of 2018) alleging offences under Sections 384, 287 and 34 of the IPC for threatening an informant in a land sale dispute. The petitioner argued that the matter was essentially a civil dispute over a sale …
Pandit Kishku (Manoj Kishku) was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of mahua liquor from a gallon. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to personal enmity, had no involvement with the seized liquor, and possessed …
The petitioner, Rinku Kumari (also known as Rinku Devi), wife of Santosh Kumar Nirala, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Narhatt PS Case No. 401 of 2025) involving alleged assault and theft under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes. The prosecution alleged that Santosh …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 583 of 2025) for alleged offences under sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, based on the seizure of a liquor van he owned. He argued that he was merely the vehicle owner, had no …
The petitioner, Rajesh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering ten litres of liquor from a sack near his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the …
The petitioner, Sanny Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he was not caught in possession, did not own the seized vehicles, and …
The petitioner, Lilat Mandal, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 131.015 litres of liquor from an under‑construction house. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, …
The petitioner, Ramratan Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 54 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Ratan Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his premises. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor …
The petitioner, Subhash Kumar Pal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 298 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code for alleged assault, outrage of modesty, and theft. The informant, Nitu Kumari, claimed that the accused entered her house, …
The petitioner, Md. Mobin Kuraishi, applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 272, 273 and 414/34 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 1,479.960 litres of …
The petitioner, Satyam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, alleging that 4.5 litres of liquor were recovered from a bag he allegedly threw. He claimed he had a clean antecedent and that the identification by a …
The petitioner, Arvind Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged seizure of 900 litres of country‑made mahua wine, although no liquor was found in his conscious possession. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the FIR does …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of two litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at …
Rekha Devi, the wife of Ramesh Sah, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 13.5 litres of liquor from a scooty she owned. The petitioner argued that she had …
Bharthari Manjhi was arrested on 2 March 2026 for alleged possession of 4 litres of country‑made liquor and 150‑200 kg of Jawa Mahua, offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. He contended that the seized items were found in a house that is jointly owned and that he …
The petitioner, Ramu Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 16 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the orchard did …
Dharmendra Manjhi was implicated in the recovery of 62 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He was not arrested at the spot and the seized vehicle was not in his conscious possession, although it was registered …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was implicated in a case (Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 176C2 of 2026) for the alleged recovery of 131 litres of foreign liquor from a vehicle, based solely on the statement of another accused, Nilesh Kumar. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the liquor, …
The petitioner, Ashok Rai, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of liquor from land adjacent to his house. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery …
The petitioner, Kunal Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 600 litres of liquor from a public ghat. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …
The petitioner, Rahul Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 139.2 litres of liquor from a room in a line hotel. The petitioner asserted that …
The petitioner, Amit Sharan, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for alleged recovery of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was unaware …
Gorelal Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 111(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, relating to alleged recovery of 420 litres of liquor from a Hyundai car. He argued that he was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Deepak Yadav, was arrested on 28 January 2026 in connection with a case involving the alleged illegal possession of 909 litres of Nepali-made liquor. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 274, 275 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. …
Kavita Kumari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 11.25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She asserted that she has a clean antecedent, was not in conscious …
The petitioners, Bhutay Yadav and Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a public area. They argued they have clean antecedents, …
Harendra Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle from which 6 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
Jaimangal Manjhi was arrested on 16 February 2026 in connection with a case involving the alleged illegal possession of 83 litres of country‑made liquor, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and …
Chinta Devi, the widow of the late Arjun Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor and 200 litres of mahua from a public place (palani). …
Petitioner Chuman Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from a river bank, a motorcycle and sacks, none of which were in his conscious possession. He argued that …
The appellants, four Yadavs from Sangrampur, were charged under several provisions of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged assault and caste-based abuse while intoxicated. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was …
Avinash Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Kalyanpur PS Case No. 333 of 2023) under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the IPC. He applied for regular bail, asserting his innocence, a clean antecedent, and pointing out that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The State opposed the bail, contending that a Section 82 investigation under the Criminal Procedure Code had already been initiated against the …
The appellants appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail. They contended that they have clean antecedents and that the FIR contains vague, omnibus allegations of caste-based …
Surendra Yadav and his wife Punam Devi, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant Kanchan Kumari, were charged under IPC Section 498A and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged dowry demand, caste‑based abuse and ousting …
The petitioner, Mahesh Prasad, was charged under several IPC sections for allegedly forging his date of birth to continue in service with the Bihar School Examination Board. He contended that the discrepancy arose from a clerical error, that his birth date was corrected in official records, and that …
The petitioner, Md. Sarfraj Alam, was accused of raping a 15‑year‑old girl under sections 69 and 96 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim alleged that the petitioner abducted her, took her to a field, and raped her, while the petitioner claimed …
The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by the 11th Additional Judicial Magistrate and affirmed by the 11th Additional Sessions Judge. During the pendency of the proceedings, the …
The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, originally imposed by a magistrate and affirmed by a sessions judge. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably, and the …
Pradipkumar Rasiklal Patel was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the trial court and the conviction was affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the complainant, Mahendrakumar Ambalal Patel, executed an affidavit of settlement and …
The accused, convicted under IPC sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 by the Special CBI Court, filed revision applications under CrPC sections 397 and 401 seeking quashing of the conviction and a probation order. The High Court examined the discretionary power under section 401, noting no …
The accused, convicted under IPC sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 by the Special CBI Court, filed revision applications under CrPC sections 397 and 401 seeking quashing of the conviction and a probation order. The High Court examined the discretionary power under section 401, noting no …
Ratilal Maghabhai Shrimali was convicted by a Judicial Magistrate First Class for an offence under Section 409 of the IPC and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment with a fine. He filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash the conviction and also applied for regular …
The petitioner, a wife deserted by her husband, sought enhancement of the maintenance awarded by the Family Court under Section 125 of the CrPC. The Family Court had fixed Rs.2,500 per month, considering the husband’s alleged income of Rs.15,000 and the wife’s earnings of Rs.4,500. The petitioner …
The applicant, Gunvantbhai Shantilal Shah, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, but the Additional Sessions Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction. He then filed a revision under …
The accused, Ramanbhai Damor, filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to set aside his conviction for offences under IPC Sections 471, 420 and 120(B) and to obtain probation. The trial court had sentenced him to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine, and the …
The applicants, Shailendra and four others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants even after a revised call. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS challenging a Lok Adalat order that rejected a police final report (NCR No. 141/2015) and treated the matter as a criminal complaint, leading to a summoning order dated 28.03.2024. The High Court examined whether a Lok Adalat …
The petitioner, a wife, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Amroha, to expedite a pending maintenance proceeding under Section 125(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (case No. 164 of 2024, Rakhi v. Amit …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Appeal No. 1934/2022) arising from a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties claimed that they had reached …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 7388 of 2025, which involved non‑compoundable offences under Sections 115(2), 131, 333 and 351(2) of the IPC. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties to obtain a …
The applicant Zainul Abdeen filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashal of Criminal Case No. 16813 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 69, 88, 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. A fresh compromise between the applicant and the victim was verified by the trial court on …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Devesh Kumar, who was implicated in a narcotics case (Crime No. 185 of 2025) under Sections 8, 15(C), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Tejman in a case involving alleged gold‑loan fraud, with charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated by a …
Ajay Singh, a BSF constable, filed a criminal revision challenging an execution order dated 16.03.2026 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, which was issued under Section 128 of the Cr.P.C. to enforce an ex parte maintenance order of Rs. 14,000 granted to Shashi …
Petitioner Vishwajeet Maurya challenged an FIR dated 27.03.2026 under IPC sections 351(3), 352 and 115(2). The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 07.04.2026, so the proper remedy was an application under CrPC Section 528/482, not a writ. The …
Mehboob Alam filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 23‑02‑2026 of the Additional District & Session Judge (Special Judge, POCSO Act) which formally framed charges against him under Section 74, Section 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The revisionist argued that …
The applicant filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the summons dated 15.01.2024 and the criminal proceedings in Complaint No.1064 of 2023 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that the cheque was issued to settle a debt and that the complaint was filed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4952 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the …
The applicant, Narendra Bafana, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance‑cum‑summoning order dated 23‑05‑2025 in a cheque‑bounce case (Complaint No. 19 of 2025 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act). The High Court examined the contention that the …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Madhukar Srivastava under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B relating to a land fraud. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged against …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under CrPC Section 482 on behalf of Juvenile X, a minor accused in a case involving assault and the death of a patient due to septicemia. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedents, and that the …
The petitioner alleged that he transferred Rs. 61,75,000 to the respondent's rice mill based on false representations and sought criminal investigation under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Civil Judge dismissed the application, deeming the dispute civil, and the Sessions Judge …
Mohd. Wahid Khan filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 30.11.2023 in a complaint case involving alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …
The applicant, Faheem, filed a bail application in Special Session Trial No.1309 of 2024 concerning offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC indicated consent, and the …
Arpit Kumar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 87, 65(1), 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 19‑year‑old, gave a statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicating she had travelled with the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Gurjar, who was charged under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping), 376 (rape), 328 (extortion) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident, …
The applicant, Rajendra Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the trial proceedings and orders dated 04.04.2025 and 15.05.2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur, on the ground that the alleged offence occurred in Rudrapur, Uttarakhand, and therefore the …
The petitioners, Mother Ayesha Children Academy (through its manager), sought to quash orders dated 19‑10‑2024 and 07‑05‑2025 that allowed the respondent to obtain interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act in a complaint (Case No. 4878 of 2023) alleging dishonour of a …
The applicant, Mandeep, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 24‑04‑2025 in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 376‑D, 354, 504, 506 and 120‑B IPC. He contended that the FIR was lodged …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhola alias Vijay Kumar, who was arrested in a Special Session Case under the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued innocence, citing a four‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, and that the FIR only …
Ramchet and four others filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's order rejecting their discharge application in a complaint under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 451. The revisionists argued that the complainant’s statements under Sections 200 and 244 of the CrPC contained …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sarwan Kevat, who was arrested on charges of theft (IPC s.363), rape (IPC s.376) and offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim, although recorded as 16 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul, who is accused under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and POCSO Act sections 5(L) and 6 for offences alleged to have occurred in Gautam Budh Nagar. The victim, a 19‑year‑old woman, testified that she had married Rahul, lived with him for …
The applicant, Akhilesh Vishwakarma, sought bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated she had voluntarily accompanied the applicant to Bengaluru …
The applicant, Kallu, alleged that his daughter was assaulted by Nilesh Gupta while traveling and that the police refused to register an FIR. He filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking registration of the case as a complaint under Section 223. The Special …
Munjal Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief after a conviction order. The applicant argued that the appeal against the conviction had already been decided by the appellate court, rendering the application unnecessary. The respondent State of …
The applicant, Anil Barar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.655 of 2016, which alleged offences of kidnapping, wrongful confinement and rape under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He asserted that he married the victim in …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Devendra Yadav challenging the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting his discharge application in a case under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. Yadav argued that the FIR was false, the injuries were caused by a blunt object and did not …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Alok Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving IPC offences (452, 354-B, 427, 506, 120-B) and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …
The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0129 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under IPC sections 352 and 351(3) BNS and CrPC section 115(2). No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The applicant, Rahul, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief from the High Court. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Deepak Verma, but the applicant's counsel was not present, while the State's counsel appeared. The Court noted the …
The petitioner Arshad Ahmed challenged orders of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) in Bijnor that took cognizance of offences under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the magistrate failed to consider the primary police report together with the supplementary report …
The applicant, Golu alias Gaurav Tamoli, filed a bail application in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 64, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. He claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 …
The petitioners sought a writ challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0214 of 2025 under Sections 85, 109 and 115(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The police had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet in Crime No. 0119 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They sought to quash the FIR and the charge‑sheet on the ground that the police had not properly investigated. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0217 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 142, 87, 74 and 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was …
The applicant, Nadeem Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 143 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant had married the victim on 29 January 2024, a fact documented …
The petitioner, Narottam Das Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0077 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition was filed despite the petitioner’s absence, and the State was represented by an …
The applicant, Gaurav Gautam, was facing trial under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. He and the victim had married on 19 October 2022, had a child, and executed a compromise deed. Both parties, including the victim, admitted the marriage and the …
The petitioners, Smt. Prachi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 533 of 2025 under Section 87 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …
The petitioners, Smt. Radha and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 289 of 2025, which involved sections 191(2), 331(6), 351(3) and 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court; only the …
The petitioner, Sachin, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0087 of 2025 under Sections 316(5), 317(4) and 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, but the State was represented by an Additional …
The petition was filed by Ranjeet Singh, a husband‑advocate, seeking the High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to expedite a maintenance application (Section 144, BNSS 2023) against his wife, Neetu Singh, a government employee. The husband claimed he was unemployed and dependent, …
The applicants, Shekhar Saini and another, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No. 45 of 2024) filed by Smt. Lakshmi under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court had earlier …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the order dated 26 September 2023 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagina, and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 256 of 2023 under Sections 18‑22 of the Domestic Violence Act. The matter had been referred …
The petitioners, Satyendra Singh and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. The High Court, after hearing counsel for the opposite party, found that the application was not pursued with sufficient prosecution. …
The applicant, Satyendra Kumar Srivastava, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. The matter was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant even after the revised call, while the State's …
The applicants filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash the summons dated 15‑03‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Cr. Misc. Case No. 1140 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Domestic Violence Act. The trial court had earlier …
The applicant, Bhola Shukla, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 24.01.2020 and the charge sheet dated 27.12.2018 in a criminal case (Case No. 1585 of 2020) arising from FIR No. 503 of 2018 under Section 506 IPC. He alleged that the FIR was …
The appellant, a Scheduled Caste medical student, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking registration of a cognizable offence under the SC/ST Act after being assaulted and threatened on campus. The Special Judge treated the application as a …
The appellants, bank officials, were summoned by a Special Judge under Section 504 IPC and Sections 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act based on a complaint alleging caste‑based abuse and threats in a bank branch. The investigating officer’s inquiry, supported by CCTV footage and statements of …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0649 of 2024, which involved Sections 115(2), 109(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 76 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, but the State was …
Jaswant Singh filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that Rs 2,00,000 was transferred by his friend to Respondent No. 2 for the latter’s hospital, but the money was not returned, leading to a claim of cheating. The Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 213 of 2021) arising from alleged offences under Sections 376, 452, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicants proved that the accused had …
Ram Briksha Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Azamgarh, which dismissed an application under CrPC Section 227 to frame a charge under IPC Section 308 against four accused, on the ground that there was no material evidence. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case alleging offences under IPC Sections 352, 351(2) and 333. They contended that the investigation was flawed, the statements of the complainant and witnesses were …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for two accused in a case registered under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act involving alleged recovery of 40 kg of ganja each from two vehicles. The applicants contended …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 3143 of 2024, alleging that they had amicably settled the dispute with Opposite Party No.2. The trial court verified the compromise, and Opposite Party No.2 expressed no desire …
The applicant, Shoaib alias Sonu, was arrested in connection with a murder alleged to have arisen from a salary dispute. The FIR broadly implicated all accused, but CCTV footage showed that the applicant only had a brief scuffle with the deceased, after which co‑accused Shahnawaz attacked the victim …
The applicant Gopal filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 26‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 376D IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant …
The applicant, Smt. Bala, filed a criminal complaint (No.641 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 427 and 323 and the trial court summoned two accused based on prima facie evidence. Dissatisfied with the trial court’s order dated 22‑08‑2024, the applicant sought revision before the …
The applicants Vipul Mishra and others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2829 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The application was listed under Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. The court noted, via an office …
The petitioner, Sukesh Kumar, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant with the alleged intent of marrying her, invoking offences under IPC Sections 363, 366‑A and 34, and POCSO Act Section 8. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC, asserted that she …
The petitioner, Ram Lakhan Singh, was charged under IPC section 376DA, IT Act section 67, and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6 for allegedly raping a minor and recording a video. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and that he was not named in the FIR, while the State argued that the victim …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant. The prosecution alleged that on 27 October 2023 the petitioner abducted the child, and the victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of …
Satrudhan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 111.750 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. The petitioner, who has five prior criminal cases, argued …
Manish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of …
The petitioners, three brothers from Sheohar district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2) and 192 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging …
Manoj Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of liquor from a location adjacent to his house and from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested, that the seized liquor was …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 8.46 litres of liquor and Rs.1,66,600 from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no …
The petitioner, Ganesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 270 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, invoking Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Amrendra Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 99 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Jiwacch Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging that 270 litres of liquor were recovered from three motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not in possession …
The petitioner, Ramesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 6.135 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the …
Prem Sahani and Sanjay Sahani applied for anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor and 200 litres of semi‑prepared jawa mahua, which were later destroyed. The petitioners claimed they had no …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 178.125 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in his personal …
The petitioners, Nagendra Mukhiya and Shatrudhan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 172.8 litres of liquor from a place adjacent to the second petitioner's house. They contended that they had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Bikesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his semi‑constructed house. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Dinesh Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 60.840 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was …
Vijay Kant Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging possession of 2.880 litres of liquor on his scooty. The petitioner argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in actual possession of the liquor at the time …
Jayram Yadav sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 alleging recovery of liquor from bushes near canals, none of which was found in his possession. He argued that the alleged liquor was …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a location not in his possession. He has an antecedent of eleven prior excise cases and …
The petitioner, Haidar, was implicated in a case under IPC sections 272 and 273/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 3.60 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
Awadhesh and Lalbabu Mandal were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 4.35 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles. They argued they had no conscious possession, were not arrested on the spot, and that …
The petitioner, Sakila Khatoon, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where 47.115 litres of liquor were seized from an auto she owned, alleged to be a violation of Section 317(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present …
The petitioner, Shatrudhan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 146.88 litres of liquor and two motorcycles were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that he was …
The petitioner, Vikash Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Birendra Raut, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, for alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery site …
The petitioner, Kundan Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7 litres of liquor. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found …
The petitioner, Devendra Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 10 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the …
Ramakant Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his possession, and the FIR omitted the name of the …
The petitioners, Sanjay Sahani, his wife Sona Devi, and his brother Vinod Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 370/2025) that alleged offences under numerous sections of the BNS and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. They contended that they have …
Ranjan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a straw house. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not in his conscious possession …
Wakil Manjhi, a resident of Mangolapur, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS‑Jalalpur Case No. 87 of 2026) alleging he was involved in the recovery of three litres of liquor from a hut adjacent to his house, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar …
The petitioner, Pramod Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he did not own. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession …
Amin Chaudhary and his wife Pinki Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing five litres of liquor at their joint family house. They argued that no arrest had occurred, the liquor was not in their conscious …
