Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 6601–6800
The petitioner, Ashok Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where 10 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to his courtyard. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, …
The petitioner, Md. Gulfam Mustafa, was granted provisional anticipatory bail by this Court in 2015, which was confirmed by the Special District Judge, Khagaria, in 2016 subject to conditions including the absence of proof of a second marriage. The complainant alleged that the petitioner had …
The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a house not owned by him. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had no …
The petitioner, Kittu Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from two motorcycles he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered for offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The …
The petitioner, Bisheshwar Ray, was an executive member of Baruara PACS but resigned in September 2010, well before alleged fraudulent transactions in 2012‑13 involving cheques for paddy and wheat purchases. He was charged under IPC Sections 409, 420 and 34 for alleged misappropriation of …
Jyoti Devi filed a dowry‑related complaint alleging cruelty, assault and dowry demands against her husband Vikash Kumar and his parents, Ram Swaroop Gupta and Rita Devi. The Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of offences under IPC Sections 323, 504, 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry …
The petitioner, Puja Kumari, filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the trial court's order taking cognizance of offences alleged against her in a case filed by Prachi Priyam. The FIR alleged offences under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 494 read with 34 and Dowry …
Lilawati Devi and Manawati Devi appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail applications in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences relating to alleged fraudulent purchase of land and caste‑based abuse. They contended that the land was …
Lilawati Devi and Manawati Devi appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail applications in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences relating to alleged fraudulent purchase of land and caste‑based abuse. They contended that the land was …
The petitioners, Rakhi Devi and Arjun Sao, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08‑03‑2016 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They requested that the petition be disposed of with …
The petitioner, Bhanu Ram, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, claiming he did not torture or demand dowry from his wife, Meena Devi. The matter had earlier been referred to mediation, which failed to resolve the …
The appellant, Ujwal Kumar, was charged under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening a neighbour with a country‑made pistol during a land‑irrigation dispute. He applied for …
The appellants appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case arising from a neighbour dispute over a drain. The FIR alleged that Pintu Kumar assaulted the informant with a knife, causing a head …
The petitioner, Lalan Pathak, was named in a complaint alleging cheating under IPC Section 420 and a dishonoured cheque under NI Act Section 138 arising from a disputed land sale. The complainant had paid part consideration to the accused seller, Babita Devi, and a cheque issued for refund was …
The petitioner, Anand Deb, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint filed by his wife under Sections 354A and 498A of the IPC alleging dowry harassment and cruelty. The matter had been referred to mediation, but the mediator’s report indicated that the dispute could not be resolved. The petitioner …
Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged against him under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He feared arrest and argued that the complainant, Rubi Devi, was willing to live with him at his matrimonial home in Lalganj and would …
The appellants, four members of the Yadav family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, intimidation and caste-based abuse arising from a land dispute with the informant, Lakhan Bhuiyan. Their …
The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault and caste‑based abuse. The appellants argued that the notice was validly served …
Petitioner Shail Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 120B, 341, 323, 307, 380 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant with a dab. The petition highlighted a one‑month delay in lodging the FIR, the simple nature of the …
Petitioner Md. Naeem Ahmad sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleges that he pretended to marry the informant, engaged in physical relations, later refused to …
The petitioners, Shyam Kumar and Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 342, 323, 354B, 34 and POCSO Act section 8, where they were accused of threatening and attempting to molest a woman in a grain field. The prosecution alleged that …
The High Court considered a revision application challenging a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties settled the dispute and the complainant gave written consent to compound …
The applicant, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque, was sentenced to one year imprisonment and a fine, later reduced to six months on appeal. He filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash the …
The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that quashed a confiscation order against M/s Aitochem Manager. The confiscation stemmed from alleged violations of the …
The petitioners, Rupaben and her son, filed a domestic‑violence application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and were awarded a maintenance of Rs.1,600 per month by the Judicial Magistrate. Unsatisfied, they appealed and the Additional Sessions Judge enhanced the amount …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11‑April‑2013 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 325 and 504. The applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the dispute and the latter …
The applicants, Tipu and others, filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the criminal proceeding S.T. No.1915 of 2024 (State vs. Tipu et al.) arising from a 2018 case under IPC sections 307, 504 and 506. The parties had amicably settled the dispute out of court, and the opposite …
The petitioners, Smt. Shahida Khatoon and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 8325 of 2009) against the State of U.P. and another. The matter had been pending since 2009 and, at the time of hearing, no counsel appeared to press the application. The …
An application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Vishwanath and four others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for the applicants, Beerendra Singh Pal and Manoj Kumar Keshari, appeared before the bench, while G.A. represented the opposite party. The learned …
The applicants, Rihan and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and subsequent criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 323, 352, 504, 5506 and 308 IPC. The parties claimed they had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State vs. Mohd Tasleem et al.) on the ground that they had entered into a compromise deed with the co‑defendants. Both the co‑defendants …
The appellant, Prince Kumar, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged caste-based abuse and assault on a police informant. He filed an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the …
Petitioners Vikki Paswan and Mina Devi filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 01-10-2016 that framed charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 504 and 34. The petition argued that the criminal proceeding had become infructuous and should …
The petitioners, a family of Ram Baran Prasad, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 04-12-2017 of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and …
Surendra Kumar Yadav filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two orders: one dated 10-08-2018 by the Sessions Judge dismissing his revision petition, and another dated 10-07-2017 by the SDJM rejecting his petition under Section 239. The petitioner argued …
Mithu Kumar Mandal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24.09 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner, Umesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 317 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was recovered from his …
Jhapasi Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 56(3) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Rakesh Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 52 litres of liquor recovered from a straw house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where recovery of 449.28 litres of liquor was reported from a public place. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at …
The petitioner, Ramu Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a public place. The petitioner asserted a clean criminal record and …
The petitioner, Jitendra Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing five litres of liquor recovered from his house. He contended that the …
Mukesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 8.56 litres of liquor from land jointly owned with Devendra Yadav. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Pintu Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 14 litres of liquor near his house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an FIR alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 83.92 litres of liquor from a bush near his house. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Dablu Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint family property, that he had no conscious possession, and …
Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 17.28 litres of liquor. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the liquor was …
The petitioner, Prince Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 20.880 litres of liquor recovered from a location adjacent to his house, based solely on a confessional statement made by his brother while in …
The petitioner, Nagendra Chaurasia, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 concerning the alleged recovery of 26 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor …
The petitioner, Nivash Yadav, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 716 of 2025) for allegedly possessing 63 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Sunil Kora, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 360 litres of liquor from his motorcycle and house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the …
Raja Kumar, the owner of a pick‑up vehicle, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 1,419.54 litres of liquor, alleged offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and that the liquor was …
The petitioners, Ranjay Yadav and Ghamandi Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 30(a), (c) and (d) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of liquor and jawa mahua near the Sone river. They …
Mukesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor near his agricultural land. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, the …
Petitioner Kamlesh Das sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Ravi Kant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 147 and 153 of the Railway Act, 1989 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that the alleged liquor recovery was from a public place, that he had no …
The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a Tata Sumo, with two motorcycles also seized. He contended that …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Rajbhar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his friend …
The petitioner, Sunil Saw, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor and semi‑prepared spirits from a public jungle area. He asserted that he has …
The petitioner, Mannu @ Abhimanyu Kumar Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 13.58 litres of liquor from his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not …
Petitioner Sanjay Lal Srivastav sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging possession of eight litres of liquor by his brother Ramakant Srivastav. The petitioner argued that he had …
Lalan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 123.75 litres of liquor from a straw house on his premises. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the …
Mithun Paswan, the owner of a vehicle from which 123.570 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware of his driver’s alleged …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2013 for allegedly possessing 5 litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, …
The petitioner, Parwati Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging recovery of 229.725 litres of liquor from two vehicles, invoking Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Excise Act. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and was not in …
Petitioners Jitendra Chaudhary and Rohit Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 47.7 litres of liquor. They contended that the liquor was not in their conscious …
The petitioner, Shyam Kumar Chaupal, was arrested on 23 January 2026 as the driver of a tempo from which 432 litres of Nepali liquor were seized, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent, false implication, …
The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 338, 336(3) and 304(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 30(a), 41(c), 33 and 34 of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the seized Scorpio, and was …
The petitioner, Nawaz Sharif, challenged an order dated 15‑09‑2016 in which the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) at Sasaram dismissed criminal proceedings on the ground that the limitation period had expired. The FIR, lodged on 28‑07‑2010, alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 329 and …
The petitioner, Naresh Pandit, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 28‑02‑2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara, in connection with case SL No.2(F) of 2015. The petitioner argued that the trial had already concluded …
The petitioner, Faruque Abdullah, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 24 January 2018 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. The petition was filed after the petitioner’s death, and the court was informed that the proceedings …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 02.05.2017 that summoned them to trial under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition argued that the underlying complaint case (No. 215-C of 2014) had already been …
The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 406, 323 and 354 of the IPC arising from a dowry‑related complaint by the victim Anita Devi, who alleged cruelty, assault and miscarriage. On appeal, the appellants contended that the prosecution case rested …
The appellant Md. Alam was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO case for alleged sexual assault of a minor, under IPC sections 377 and 34 and POCSO section 6, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. The conviction was based primarily on the victim's written application and …
The appellant was convicted in 2011 for rape under Section 376 IPC based on the allegation that he assaulted a 14‑year‑old girl, promised to marry her, and later refused, leading to pregnancy. The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, several family witnesses, an eye‑witness, and a medical …
Petitioner Prakash Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 19 September 2016 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed that he no longer wished to …
Subhash Chandra Gupta appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379 of the IPC and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The trial court had denied bail on 18‑11‑2021. The appellant …
The petitioner, Md. Bablu Khan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint under Section 498A IPC alleging dowry‑related cruelty against his wife, Tamana Khanam. He contended that the allegations were false, he had a clean antecedent, and he was willing to treat his wife with dignity. The State and …
The petitioners, Md. Abul Kaise and his wife Sarwari Begam, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑06‑2018 that framed charges under Sections 341, 323, 406, 420, 504/34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The petitioners, three individuals from East Champaran, filed a petition under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the opportunity to cross‑examine a witness (PW‑1) whose testimony they claimed was unsupported by other evidence. The petition challenged the order of the Additional …
The petitioner, Narayan Das, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging he tortured his wife, Kiran Das, for dowry demands, invoking sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false and that he was willing to treat his wife with dignity. …
The petitioner, Anubhav Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code alleging kidnapping of the informant’s daughter. He claimed innocence and argued that he was a juvenile at the time of the alleged offence, filing an interlocutory …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar Mishra, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 05‑08‑2017 of the District & Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, which had dismissed a revision petition and refused to interfere with a cognizance order dated 13‑02‑2017. …
The appellants, Anant Sah and his son Manish Kumar, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for alleged assault on a minor named Aman. They applied for anticipatory bail, but the Special Court refused, …
The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with offences under Section 354B of the IPC and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have attempted rape and indecent assault on a minor. He contended that he has a clean record, has been in custody since 7 October 2025, and that …
The Gujarat State Co‑op. Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd. appealed against the trial court's acquittal of Ratansinh Chandansinh Vaghela under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …
The petitioner, Dakshesh Ramnikbhai Patel, filed a criminal revision seeking relief from a conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which had been affirmed by the appellate court. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably, …
The applicant had taken a hand loan of Rs.95,000 and issued a cheque that was later dishonoured for insufficient funds. A complaint was filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, leading to his conviction by the Metropolitan Magistrate and affirmation by the Additional Sessions …
The appellants Saurabh Verma and two others appealed to quash a summoning order issued by the Special Judge in a case alleging offences under the IPC and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, filed after an unreasonable delay, and motivated by a …
The applicant, Nagendra Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in Case No. 37 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 506 IPC arising from Crime No. 68 of 2020. The applicant argued that Sections 420 …
Vikram Singh filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order treating his Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application as a complaint in a POCSO matter. He argued that the court erred in law, exceeded jurisdiction, and failed to order statutory medical investigation despite the …
Geeta Devi filed a criminal revision under Section 175(3) B.N.S.S. challenging a Judicial Magistrate's order that dismissed her application on the ground that the dispute was purely civil. She alleged that opposite parties fraudulently obtained a mutation of agricultural land belonging to her late …
The applicant, Chintu Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 03.07.2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Aligarh, which directed him to pay interim maintenance of Rs.4,500 per month to his wife under …
Akbar Ali filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. The High Court noted that neither the applicant nor the second opposite party were present, though the Government Advocate appeared. The Court found that the application was not …
The petitioners, Umesh Rai and another, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 09‑12‑2025 of the Special Judge (E.C. Act) that dismissed their application for discharge under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 250(2) of the BNSS, 2023. The case involved charges under Sections …
The appellant Munnalal appealed against the acquittal of respondents Suraj Bhan and others on charges of criminal breach of trust under Sections 406 and 408 IPC. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the pendency of the appeal, the two respondents died, as …
The petitioner, Deep Chandra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another party opposed the application. The High Court observed that the petitioner did not appear before the court and there was no opposition from the …
Gudiya filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant's learned counsel argued that the application had become ineffective and should not be entertained. The Court examined the pleadings and found that the application indeed lacked any operative …
Amit Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The State of U.P. and another party were served as respondents. No opposition counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and no other parties were present. The High Court observed that in the absence of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Appeal No. 04 of 2021) pending before the Civil Judge/FTC, Jalaun, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑02‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 27‑02‑2024 in Criminal Case No.1122 of 2024, arising from offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had already reached an …
The revisionists sought enhancement of the maintenance awarded by the Family Court under Section 125 Cr.P.C., arguing that the respondent‑defendant earned Rs 1,00,000 per month and that maintenance should have been payable from the date of the original application. The Family Court had fixed …
Mohd Usman (revisionist) filed a criminal revision under Section 126(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Moradabad, which upheld a Section 125 CrPC maintenance order directing him to pay Rs.20,000 per month to the opposite party …
The applicant, Dilshad Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 3096 of 2017) arising from offences under Sections 376, 493, 504, 506 and 323 IPC. He argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC did …
Ashish Kumar Dixit filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No representative of the applicant appeared before the court, and the appointed senior counsel, Mr. Satyvrat Tripathi, was also absent. The court noted the absence of any party or counsel to argue the …
The applicant, Gajendra Yadav, filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a criminal proceeding arising from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a Rs.14‑lakh cheque that was dishonoured. He alleged that the cheque was lost, that no liability existed, …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside an order dated 23 February 2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, which had allowed a criminal revision filed by the opposite party against an order of attachment of land made by the …
The applicant, Khalid, deposited Rs.2,00,000 as bail surety and later furnished fresh sureties and a personal bond as ordered by the court. He applied to the trial court for release of the deposited amount, but the application was rejected on the ground that the case had been committed to the …
The State filed a criminal complaint (CC No. 5390 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 500, 501 and 384 IPC arising from a land‑mutation dispute. The civil judge, however, issued a summoning order on 10‑11‑2022 charging the four applicants with offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC, …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 22‑12‑2015 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat in a dowry‑related complaint (Smt. Seema v. Monu). They alleged that the prosecution was malicious, that no offence under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, …
The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The civil court had verified a compromise between the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 01‑02‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑10‑2024, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 907 of 2024 (State vs. Susheela Devi @ Kazri and others) relating to …
The revisionist filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 18.08.2025 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Ghazipur, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The revision was filed 85 days late, and a delay condonation application was made. The …
The applicant, Ramu Chauhan, was charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6 for offences arising from a 2021 crime. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire Sessions case, asserting that he had married the victim on 6 May 2022, …
The applicant, Tej Pratap Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.11188 of 2025) for an alleged rape under Section 376 IPC. He argued that the FIR was lodged more than a year after the incident, that the victim had …
The applicants, Indra Pal and three others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief from pending criminal proceedings. The High Court examined whether it could exercise its inherent powers to quash the proceedings. Relying on the precedent set in Smt. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑10‑2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑12‑2019, and the entire criminal proceedings of Session Trial No.702 of 2022 relating to offences under Sections 452, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑09‑2013 and the cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2014 in Criminal Case No.126 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. Both parties …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑09‑2013 and the cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2014 in Criminal Case No. 127 of 2014 (State vs Laxmi Kant Mishra et al.) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 427, 351 …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rishabh Chaurasiya, who is the brother‑in‑law of the FIR complainant. The FIR originally contained charges of dowry harassment but no rape allegation; however, during investigation the complainant recorded statements alleging rape. …
Petitioner Jaheer Alam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police (respondent No.2) to conduct an inquiry under Section 173(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code concerning an incident dated 24‑04‑2025 and to consider a representation dated 22‑09‑2025. The Court …
The applicant, Chhote Lal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑06‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 25‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No.15299 of 2025. The charge‑sheet alleged offences …
Shankar Lal filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging a order dated 24‑03‑2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Jaunpur, and a criminal revision order dated 27‑01‑2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jaunpur. The applicant …
The applicant, a 19‑year‑old student, was charged under Section 103(1) CrPC for firing a double‑barrel gun that killed a deceased during a scuffle, as alleged by the prosecution and corroborated by several eyewitnesses. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing the shooting was …
The applicants Kallu and four others filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 6059 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 0088/2024 under IPC sections 147, 452, 323, 504 and 506. They contended that the cognizance order dated 1 July 2024 was issued before the …
The Allahabad High Court considered three applications under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash Criminal Complaint Case No. 586 of 2019, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The complaint arose from a civil dispute over land and sale deeds, where the complainant …
Sudha and Sapna filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a provisional order dated 23‑01‑2026 passed by the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate of Bhognipur, Kanpur Dehat in FIR No. 1736 of 2023 under IPC Sections 354 and 506. The High Court …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Rajvati Devi and four others seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, presided by Justice Gautam Chowdhary, allowed the application. The order refers to a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 28‑11‑2025 in Crime No. 454 of 2024, alleging that the FIR and charge‑sheet did not warrant interference. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order …
The complainant, the mother‑in‑law of the applicants, alleged that they conspired with bank officials to open a joint account and misappropriate Rs 10 lakh, leading to a complaint under Section 156(3) CrPC. The police report characterized the matter as a family dispute and found the allegations …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 10315 of 2009, which involved offences under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act. During the pendency of the trial, a compromise deed was …
The petitioners, Smt Savita and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Brijesh Kumar Srivastava, informed the court that the petitioners wished to withdraw the application and would not pursue any relief. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 01.04.2006 and the related criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 263 of 2006). The court examined the complaint and found that the allegations disclosed a cognizable offence and were …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramcharan Verma under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant contended that the recovery of 28.135 kg of ganja from a swift car, in which he was merely a passenger, was false and …
The applicant, Dev Mani Pandey, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑03‑2018 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. The applicant and the opposite party, who are living as husband and wife, executed a compromise …
The applicant, Anuj Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking relief from an interim maintenance order of Rs.5,000 per month imposed by the Meerut Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He contended that the order was passed without considering his …
The applicant, Piyush Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a provisional order dated 30.05.2025 passed by the Family Court, Prayagraj, in a matrimonial dispute involving alleged dowry harassment. The respondent (State of U.P. and another) had filed a FIR …
The applicant filed a criminal revision under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending before a Special Magistrate. Mediation between the parties failed, and the court examined the factual disputes and the credibility of the …
The applicant, Abhikshek Vikram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court, seeking discharge. The respondents were the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. Counsel for the applicant was Vijai Krishna Agnihotri and for the respondents …
The applicants, practising advocates, were accused in a criminal complaint (sections 420, 467 and 468 IPC) filed by Manjeet Singh arising out of a partition suit they were handling. A non‑bailable warrant was issued against them, and they sought to quash the warrant and the underlying proceedings by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1610 of 2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, alleging that the dispute is a family matter that could be settled …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhi Khatri (Abhishek) in a murder case (Crime No. 1184 of 2025) under CrPC sections 103(1), 190 and 191. The applicant argued that the prosecution’s case was based solely on a non‑eyewitness statement implicating him, that the co‑accused had …
The applicant, Mohd Raja, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in anticipation of arrest in a case involving alleged offences under sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS. He contended that the FIR falsely implicated him, alleging that the …
The applicants, Lighthouse Constructions Pvt Ltd and another, filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 28 July 2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a …
The applicants, Ashok and eight others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 30‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 09‑04‑2025 in State v. Sandeep Kumar (Case No. 946 of 2025) relating to offences under various IPC sections. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Meghshyam, husband of a woman who died by hanging, in Criminal Case No. 673 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 108(1) and 85 of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a four‑day delay in lodging the FIR and the …
The applicants, Akash and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 16‑06‑2024 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Mainpuri, in a complaint case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 354, 504 IPC and …
The applicant, Usman, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging offences under various sections of the B.N.S. and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He claimed false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and pointed to the grant of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the counsel for the applicants requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed. The Court considered the request and found no merit in proceeding with …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the summoning order dated 27‑02‑2026 in Complaint Case No. 3308 of 2025, which was filed under Sections 333, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 74 of the B.N.S. The complaint alleged a cognizable offence and was supported by …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohan Singh, who is the father‑in‑law of a woman who allegedly committed suicide within six months of marriage. The applicant claimed the allegations against him were false, that the deceased had an illicit relationship, and that …
Nahar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 1757 of 2023) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque. He argued that the dispute was essentially a money dispute and could be settled amicably …
The applicant, Naresh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application claiming that no charge-sheet had been filed and that he was falsely implicated. The State opposed, asserting that a charge-sheet had indeed been filed and highlighting the applicant's prior involvement in seven criminal cases. The …
Manoj Kumar Maurya filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by his brother Uttam Kumar Maurya. The applicant …
The applicant, Golu alias Ranveer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a session case involving alleged extortion, assault and other offences. He contended that the allegations were vague, that no substantive evidence linked him to the alleged …
Petitioner Lalloo Pal challenged the dismissal of his complaint alleging that his father was abducted, confined for years, assaulted, and forced to sign loan documents. The complaint, filed under Sections 200 and 202 of the CrPC, was dismissed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and affirmed by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 994 of 2022) arising from an FIR alleging assault and threats while erecting an electric pole. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, there was no injury to the complainant, and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 3001 of 2021) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Kishan Kumar Saini under Sections 354A and 504 of the IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise, …
The accused filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a July 1, 2025 order of the Judicial Magistrate, Meerut that dismissed their discharge application under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 354, 504, 506 IPC …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 9 July 2024 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1771 of 2021 (State v. Virendra and others) relating to offences under Sections 308, 323 and 504 IPC. Both the applicants …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 337 of 2022 and the charge‑sheet dated 19‑Jan‑2019, which arose from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party asserted that they had amicably settled the …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special S.T. No.384 of 2023) against Mahendra alias Sonu Rajbhar and others for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Smt Komal Lakhani challenging a Family Court order that granted her Rs 15,000 per month as maintenance from her husband, effective only from March 2022. The court noted that the parties were married in 2014, cohabited for less than a month, and …
The applicant, Nayamuddin, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case pending under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The applicant and the second opposite party had reached a compromise, which was acknowledged by both …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal case No. 35366 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party. Both parties admitted …
The applicant Amit Kumar Chaudhary filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal case No.3089 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC relating to alleged short‑supply of paddy. He contended that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and the pending criminal case (Case No. 266 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached a …
The applicant, Shivam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Praveen Kumar Mishra, informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application. The court considered whether the …
Vikas Chaudhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking an ad‑interim mandamus directing the DGP of Lucknow to reinvestigate Crime No. 173 of 2023 under IPC sections 504 and 506 and to submit a fresh police report. The State argued that the investigating officer had already filed a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 19‑12‑2024 and the entire criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 159 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 120B, 506, 420, 419 and 386 IPC. The applicants argued that they …
The applicant Sonu filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Cr. No.9 of 2024) pending before the Special Judge (POCSO) in Bareilly, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a criminal proceeding initiated under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, in which the opposite party alleged domestic violence by her husband and his relatives. The court examined the …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application to quash criminal case ST No.491/2008 (State v. Paramhansh Singh) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and the trial court verified the compromise. Both the applicant …
The applicants, Ekta Lunia and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ghaziabad who refused to renew their passports on the ground of a pending criminal case. The High Court had earlier allowed their …
The appellant, Jaleshwar Mahato, was charged under multiple IPC offences and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a 2023 case. He appealed the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not an accused in a related earlier case and that …
The petitioners, four residents of Hajipur Town, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging they were falsely implicated in an assault where the informant claimed they, along with others, attacked him with a sword …
The petitioners, six residents of Badhar village, feared arrest in a case (PS‑Kalpa, Jehanabad) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. They alleged that the FIR stemmed from a land‑dispute in which an informant and his son were assaulted and …
The petitioner, Ram Sikeel Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substantive (BNS) law. He claimed to have a clean record and alleged that the informant falsely implicated him, citing a three‑day delay between the alleged …
Petitioner Parwez Alam sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC, alleging that the FIR was filed without a show‑cause notice despite his alleged use of a forged teaching certificate. He also disclosed two prior cases under …
The petitioners, a group of villagers from Simra, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNS) Act, 2023 for alleged assaults that arose from a neighbour dispute over the use of a drain. They contended that the FIR was false, that there was no motive, and that several of …
The appeal was filed by Irshad Kuraishi challenging the Additional District & Sessions Judge’s refusal to grant regular bail in a rape case registered under Sections 70(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …
The petitioner, Sanjevan Mahto, a government school teacher, was named among fifteen accused in an FIR alleging assault and murder that occurred on 08-11-2025 in an agricultural field. The informant claimed the accused entered the field armed, assaulted her husband, leading to his death, and …
The petitioner, Md. Aahid, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 4523.04 litres of liquor from a seized vehicle he owned. This was his second anticipatory bail application; a prior petition was mistakenly withdrawn on the ground …
The petitioners, four brothers from Jhauwa village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They contended they have clean antecedents and were falsely implicated by an informant who …
The petitioner, Binod Kumar, was arrested on 30 September 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged possession of a country-made pistol and live cartridges, alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and alleging procedural …
The appellants, members of a family involved in a land dispute, were charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a land broker and seizing his property. Their anticipatory bail …
The petitioners, six residents of Deokuli village, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging assault under IPC sections 147, 149, 504, 323, 307 and 325. The FIR was filed ten days after the alleged incident, which arose from a neighbour dispute, and the injuries were described as …
The petitioner, Bablu Yadav, sought bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under several IPC sections (341, 323, 332, 353, 379, 34) and Forest Act sections (33, 41, 42) related to the alleged illegal loading of sand using his tractor seized from a forest area. He contended that he is …
The petitioners, Md. Halim and Shabana Khatoon, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case (Chakand P.S. Case No. 337 of 2025) where they were alleged to have participated in the torture and strangulation of the victim. The prosecution …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Piprakothi PS Case No. 370 of 2025) involving alleged illegal production of country-made liquor. Police, acting on secret information, raided the premises of co‑accused Nagendra Singh, but the petitioners allegedly blocked the police …
The petitioners, three residents of Mahinathpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Arms Act. The FIR does not name them; their alleged involvement emerged later from CCTV footage, but no specific …
The petitioners, who are close relatives of the informant, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a FIR alleging that they, armed with weapons, entered the informant’s house, assaulted his sons, molested his wife, and looted valuables. The petitioners argued that the FIR was lodged six …
The petitioner, Md. Hussain, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving alleged recovery of 865.710 litres of liquor from a truck, with charges under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 30(a), 36 …
The petitioner, Ajit Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 600 litres of liquor and 6000 litres of fermented jawa mahua from the Ganga river. …
The petitioners, Bharat Kumar and Manish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in connection with an excise case alleging recovery of 1,049.640 litres of liquor from a truck, invoking Sections 30(a) of the Excise Act. They argued they have clean antecedents, were …
Suniti Kumari Mehta was arrested in connection with a case alleging that she assaulted a neighbor (the informant) with a gadasi, causing a cut injury to the neck. The petitioner argued that the incident arose from a spontaneous verbal altercation linked to a land and boundary dispute, that there was …
Mohan Kumar, a resident of Jalalpur, Patna, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering liquor from a riverbank and a cattle shed. He contended that he has a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor …
