TANIYA MALIKversusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
2018 INSC 16816 February 2018Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined petitions challenging the 2015 Delhi Judicial Service Examination, where petitioners sought re‑valuation of answer sheets, moderation of marks, relaxation of minimum qualifying percentages in written papers and viva voce, and rounding‑off of aggregate marks. The Court held that moderation is …
HIGH COURT OF DELHIversusDEVINA SHARMA
2022 INSC 30414 March 2022Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court heard appeals challenging the Delhi High Court's age criteria for the Delhi Judicial Service (DJS) and Delhi Higher Judicial Service (DHJS) examinations. The petitioners argued that the upper age limit of 32 years for DJS and the minimum age of 35 years for DHJS were unconstitutional, especially after…
RAJENDRA SINGH VERMA (DEAD) THROUGH LRSversusLT. GOVERNOR OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
2011 INSC 67412 September 2011Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered three appeals challenging the compulsory retirement of two Delhi Higher Judicial Service officers and one Delhi Judicial Service officer. The appellants argued that their cases could not be reconsidered before reaching the age of 55 after an earlier screening at age 50, that the Lt. Governo…
IN RE: RECRUITMENT OF VISUALLY IMPAIRED IN JUDICIAL SERVICES versus
2025 INSC 3002 March 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether visually impaired candidates are suitable for judicial service and whether recent amendments to the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service Rules (Rule 6A and the proviso to Rule 7) violated constitutional equality and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Court held that vis…