Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
1034 judgments · newest first · showing 1001–1034
Vishal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act, where 23.5 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a house not owned by him. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the …
The Patna High Court entertained two anticipatory bail applications filed by Krishna Kant Kumar (also identified as Manoj Kumar) in separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings arising from a police case involving the alleged recovery of 555.57 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle and a Basa. The …
Khalil Sai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was …
Manoj Kumar Data, the owner of a licensed liquor shop in Dhanbad, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,400 litres of liquor from a "magic vehicle." …
Kunil Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 47.5 litres of liquor and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the seized vehicle does not belong to him, and the only evidence against him is a …
Awdesh Sah applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 141.6 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …
The petitioner, Chaitu Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a)(c) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 29.1 litres of liquor from a scooty registered in his father's name. The petitioner argued that he was not …
Guddu Dhangad applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 45.700 litres of liquor from his joint‑family house. The petitioner asserted a clean antecedent and argued that the …
The petitioner, Arun Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of three litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested …
Rahul Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was unaware of his friend's misuse of the vehicle, and …
Manoj Uraon applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for possession of liquor. The petitioner argued he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was recovered from a joint family house, and no conscious possession was …
Vinay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a car owned by him was seized containing 231.75 litres of liquor, leading to charges under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 18 litres of liquor. He argued that he had no ownership of the seized vehicle, was not arrested on the spot, and the police had implicated …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …
Petitioners Rahul Soni and Deepak Kumar Soni, brothers, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of five litres of beer from a car. They argued they have clean antecedents, were …
The petitioner, Ashan Nijami, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 9.250 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging that 82.35 litres of liquor were recovered from his XUV 500 vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …
The petitioner, Saddam Miyan, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 225 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at …
Kuldeep Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly receiving 4.84 kg of ganja from an accomplice, Sikandar Kumar. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting no …
Manoj Kumar Yadav and Nitish Kumar Mandal applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 108 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. The petitioners argued that they were not …
The petitioner, Ranjit Rai, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 37(b)(c) of the Excise Act. He alleged that the informant, his aunt, fabricated the complaint due to a …
The petitioner, Subodh Chauhan, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession …
The petitioner, Abhinandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 1080 litres of liquor from two vehicles he owned. He argued that he was not present at the time of …
The petitioner, Sikender Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 122.7 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, the …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar Rai, owner of a bus, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 22.5 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He was not arrested at the spot and did not have the liquor in his conscious possession; the allegation arose solely …
Sanjeev Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from his semi‑constructed house and from another person's house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, no liquor …
Manish Kumar Singhania applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging that 2,479.2 litres of liquor were recovered from two trucks, one of which he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession …
Petitioner Rajnandan Bhagat applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from a public canal. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, …
The father of the deceased lodged an FIR after finding his son's body in a forest, alleging that the deceased had been with two friends. The trial court convicted the two accused under Sections 302, 34 and 201 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, relying mainly on the testimony of two …
The Supreme Court examined an appeal against a High Court order that granted bail to Mitthan Yadav, a history‑sheeter accused of multiple serious offences including murder, under several IPC sections. The High Court had relied on the principle of parity, noting that a co‑accused, Ashok Kumar, had …
The Government of NCT of Delhi invited applications for L‑52 liquor licences for 2004‑05, but later announced a policy to stop issuing fresh licences. The appellants, who had applied before the policy change, claimed that they had an accrued right and a legitimate expectation to be granted licences, …
The appellant, Mis. Ramnarayan Satyanarayan Agrawal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., employed only 22 workers and sought to manufacture potable alcohol under a state‑granted permission. Respondents, Associated Alcohols & Breweries Ltd. and others, challenged the appellant's tender, arguing that only a …
The plaintiff, a landlady, leased premises to the defendant for the business of retreading tyres at a rent of Rs.850 per annum. When the defendant defaulted on rent, the plaintiff served a 30‑day notice to terminate the tenancy. The defendant contended that the lease was for "manufacturing purposes" …
