Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Finance Act, 2012

7 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

RADHIKA AGARWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 27227 February 2025

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the amendments to the Customs Act, 1962 and the arrest provisions in the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, arguing that offences under these statutes remain non‑cognizable and that authorized officers must obtain a magistrate's warrant, relying on the Om

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHIversusM/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION

2021 INSC 49517 September 2021Disposed off

M/s Mitsubishi Corporation, a non‑resident Japanese company, was assessed for income attributable to its Indian operations for the years 1998‑99 to 2004‑05 and was levied interest under section 234B of the Income‑Tax Act for alleged default in payment of advance tax. The company argued that, because tax was deductible

COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISEversusM/S CITI BANK N. A.

2021 INSC 8579 December 2021Matter referred to larger bench

The Commissioner of Service Tax issued show‑cause notices to Citibank alleging that the Rs 2 interchange fee it earned as an issuing bank on credit‑card transactions was taxable service income. Citibank contended that it performed no service, that the fee was interest, and that tax had already been paid by the acquirin

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. MARGADARSHI CHIT FUNDS (P) LTD. ETC.

2017 INSC 5884 July 2017Dismissed

The Union of India challenged the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment that exempted chit fund companies from service tax on the ground that their activities fell within the definition of "banking and other financial services" under s.65(12)(a)(v) of the Finance Act after the 2007 amendment. The issue was whether the ope

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusCALCUTTA CLUB LIMITED

2019 INSC 11113 October 2019Disposed off

The Calcutta Club, a Section 25 company operating as a members' club, was served with a notice for non‑payment of sales tax on food and drinks supplied to its permanent members. The Club argued that, under the doctrine of mutuality, no sale occurred because the supplier and the buyer were the same persons, a view uphel

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search