Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Forest Conservation Act

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

B.L. WADHERAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 21419 April 2002Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest writ petition challenging several gifts of village common (shamlat) land by the Bhondsi Gram Panchayat to a former Prime Minister and his trust. The petitioner alleged that the gifts violated the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961, its 1964 Rules, and the Fo

T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULKPAD ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.

2018 INSC 15216 February 2018Disposed off

The State of Himachal Pradesh sought permission to carry out silvicultural felling of Chil Pine, Khair and broad‑leaved forests up to 1,500 metres above sea level, arguing that limited felling is necessary for regeneration. The Supreme Court had earlier, by its 12‑December‑1996 and 14‑February‑2000 orders, imposed a bl

SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2017 INSC 122614 December 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court revisited its earlier orders that imposed an absolute ban on iron‑ore mining in Bellary, Chitradurga and Tumkur districts of Karnataka, later allowing limited mining under a capped Maximum Permissible Annual Production (MPAP). Lessees of Category A and B mines sought modification of the cap, arguing t

VEERU DEVGANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.

2008 INSC 103111 September 2008Appeal(s) allowed

Veeru Devgan, a film producer, obtained permission to shoot a film in a reserve forest in Ooty and entered into an agreement with the District Forest Officer. The State later cancelled the licence alleging damage to grasslands, but the High Court set aside the cancellation, finding no breach or environmental harm. None

T.N. GODAVARAMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2008 INSC 9178 August 2008IA disposed

The Supreme Court considered an interlocutory application filed by Sterlite Industries (Siil) seeking clarification on the rehabilitation package and the proposed transfer of the Niyamgiri bauxite mining lease to a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) as suggested by the Central Empowered Committee (CEC). The Court held that

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search