Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972

10 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

NATIONAL INSURANCE SPECIAL VOLUNTARY RETIRED/ RETIRED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION & ANR.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2018 INSC 100126 October 2018Leave Granted & Dismissed

The appellants, former employees of United India Insurance, retired under the General Insurance Employees’ Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2004 (SVRS‑2004) and claimed that they were also entitled to the notional five‑year service benefit provided under the earlier General Insurance (Employees) Pension Scheme, 199

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusRAGHUVIR SINGH NARANG & ANR.

2010 INSC 12225 February 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Development Officers of New India Assurance who exercised the Special Voluntary Retirement Package (SVRP) under the 2003 Amendment Scheme could withdraw their option before the employer’s acceptance. The Court held that the SVRP is part of a statutory scheme framed under Section 17A o

N. R. SRINIVASA IYERversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO., LTD.

1983 INSC 8222 July 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff's motor car was damaged in an accident and, under the terms of his insurance policy, was taken to a repair workshop where the insurer approved the repair estimate and agreed to pay the charges. While in the workshop the car was destroyed by fire. The plaintiff sued the insurer claiming that, by virtue of

GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BOMBAY

1999 INSC 43321 September 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The General Insurance Corporation of India, a wholly government‑owned insurer, set aside a sum for redemption of preference shares and debited it to its profit and loss account in accordance with Rule 2(2)(a) of the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Rules, 1973. The Income‑Tax Officer treated the amount as r

AJOY KUMAR BANERJEE & ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDLA & ORS. ETC.

1984 INSC 6421 March 1984Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, employees of the nationalised general insurance companies, challenged the 30 September 1980 notification introducing the General Insurance (Rationalisation and Revision of Pay Scales and Other Conditions of Service) Second Amendment Scheme, alleging it violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 31 of the Const

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusMANUBHAI DHARMASINHABHAI GAJERA & ORS.

2008 INSC 73016 May 2008Dismissed

The petitioners held mediclaim policies with United India Insurance Co. Ltd., a subsidiary of the General Insurance Corporation of India, and paid premiums annually. After several claims, the insurer refused to renew the policies, citing high claim ratios and pre‑existing diseases. The Gujarat High Court ordered renewa

DR. SUHAS H. POPHALEversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ITS ESTATE OFFICER

2014 INSC 9211 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Suhas H. Pophale occupied a flat in the Indian Mercantile Mansion under a leave‑and‑license agreement dated 20‑12‑1972, which was later deemed a tenancy under Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act (effective 1‑Feb‑1973). The premises became owned by Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., a government‑owned company, on 1‑Jan‑197

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.versusKIRPAL SINGH

2014 INSC 2210 January 2014Dismissed

The respondents, employees of National Insurance Co., opted for voluntary retirement under the General Insurance Employees Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2004 (SVRS 2004) and claimed pension under the General Insurance (Employees) Pension Scheme, 1995. The insurers rejected the claim, arguing that pension under t

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ETC.versusHANSRAJBHAI V. KODALA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 1934 April 2001

The Supreme Court considered appeals by Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and other insurers against claims filed by Hansrajbhai V. Kodala and others under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for lump‑sum compensation on a structured formula basis. The claimants had also sought interim compensation from the Claims T

BIMAN KRISHNA BOSEversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 3372 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Biman Krishna Bose had a mediclaim policy with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. After the insurer failed to pay a claim for his wife's hospitalization, Bose pursued the matter through consumer forums and the Supreme Court, eventually obtaining a decree for payment. While the litigation was pending, the policy fell due f

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search