Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Guardians and Wards Act, 1890

41 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DAVID JUDEversusHANNAH GRACE JUDE AND ORS.

2003 INSC 34830 July 2003Disposed off

The husband filed a contempt petition against his wife and her mother for violating an unconditional undertaking given to the Supreme Court that the child would be brought back to India and that they would appear before the Family Court when required. Despite multiple notices and adjournments, the wife remained absent

USHA K. PILLAIversusRAJ. K. SRINIVAS AND ORS.

1993 INSC 17430 April 1993Disposed off

The appellant, Usha Pillai, was appointed guardian of her granddaughter Nivedita after the child's mother committed suicide. The child's father, R.K. Srinivas, abducted the child and took her to the United States, leading the appellant to file a kidnapping complaint. During the criminal trial, the father obtained exemp

ROHITH THAMMANA GOWDAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2022 INSC 77029 July 2022Disposed off

The appellant, a US permanent resident, filed a writ petition in Karnataka High Court seeking habeas corpus to have his 11‑year‑old son, a naturalised US citizen born in the United States, returned to the US. The child had been taken to India by the mother without the father's consent in March 2020, and US courts had i

ARATHY RAMACHANDRANversusBIJAY RAJ MENON

2025 INSC 58729 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The mother, a working professional, filed a petition seeking permanent custody of her two minor children, alleging the father might forcibly remove them. The Family Court restrained the father and granted limited visitation, which the father appealed. The High Court then ordered a 15‑day monthly interim custody for eac

MRS. AKELLA LALITHAversusSRI KONDA HANUMANTHA RAO & ANR.

2022 INSC 75928 July 2022Case Partly allowed

The mother, Akella Lalitha, gave birth to a child with her first husband Konda Balaji, who died shortly after. She later remarried Akella Ravi Narasimha Sarma, and the child's grandparents sought guardianship and visitation, later prompting the High Court to order a restoration of the child's original surname and to re

RAJESH K. GUPTAversusRAM GOPAL AGARWALA AND ORS.

2005 INSC 23728 April 2005Dismissed

Rajesh K. Gupta, a Supreme Court advocate, filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking custody of his daughter Rose Mala, who was residing with her mother Aruna Gupta and the maternal grandparents. He alleged that the mother suffered from paranoid schizophrenia and that the child had been abducted by the grandparents. The De

VIKRAM VIR VOHRAversusSHALINI BHALLA

2010 INSC 17025 March 2010Dismissed

The husband and wife obtained a mutual‑consent divorce under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, agreeing that the mother would retain custody of their son and the father would have fortnightly visitation. Both parties later filed applications under Section 26 of the Act seeking to modify the custody arrangement: t

MURUGAN & ORS.versusKESAVA GOUNDER (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ORS.

2019 INSC 25925 February 2019Dismissed

The suit concerned property of Petha Gounder that had been sold by his son Balaraman both in his own name and on behalf of his minor son Palanivel without court permission, violating Section 8 of the Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act, 1956. The plaintiffs, sons of Kannan, filed a suit in 1992 for declaration and posses

ST. THERESA'S TENDER LOVING CARE HOME AND ORS.versusSTATE OF A.P.

2005 INSC 52024 October 2005Dismissed

The Society (St. Theresa's Tender Loving Care Home) sought permission to place a five‑year‑old girl, Sahiti, for inter‑country adoption by two U.S. residents. The child was said to have been relinquished by her mother, but the relinquishment deed was later found to be fabricated and the Society had been prosecuted for

INDERJIT SINGH GREWALversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2011 INSC 60123 August 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The husband and wife obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent in 2008. The wife later filed a criminal complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 alleging the divorce decree was a sham and that they continued to live together. The husband moved the trial magistrate under Section 482

LEKHAversusP. ANIL KUMAR

2006 INSC 87221 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The parties divorced after a period of separation; the mother later remarried. Their 12‑year‑old son had been living with the mother. The father filed a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 seeking custody. The trial court, after interviewing the child who expressed a clear desire to remain with his mother,

GAUTAM KUMAR DASversusNCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 61020 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Gautam Kumar Das, lost his wife and father to COVID-19 shortly after the birth of his daughter Sugandha and temporarily handed her over to his late wife's sister. After remarrying, he sought to regain custody, filing a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act and later a habeas corpus writ, but the Del

GAURAV NAGPALversusSUMEDHA NAGPAL

2008 INSC 132419 November 2008Dismissed

The father, Gaurav Nagpal, had retained custody of his minor child after allegedly kidnapping and confining the mother, Sumedha Nagpal, and repeatedly violating court orders. The mother filed an application under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 and Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1

KIRAN RAJU PENUMACHAversusTEJUSWINI CHOWDHURY

2025 INSC 35817 March 2025Disposed off

The appellant-father and respondent-mother obtained a mutual consent divorce, with the mother given permanent custody of their son and the father granted interim weekend custody. The father later filed an execution petition to enforce the decree, while the mother filed an application seeking modification of the interim

AMAN LOHIAversusKIRAN LOHIA

2021 INSC 19017 March 2021Disposed off

The father (Aman Lohia) filed a guardianship petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and the Family Courts Act, 1984 seeking declaration as guardian of his two‑year‑old daughter. The mother (Kiran Lohia) did not file a written statement but filed several applications under CPC, including a Section 151 applicat

CHANDER PRAKASH TYAGIversusSHRI BENARSI DAS(DEAD) BY LRS. AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 97117 March 2015Dismissed

Advocate Chander Prakash Tyagi was engaged by Banarsi Das to seek guardianship of his grandson under the Guardians and Wards Act. The complainant alleged that Tyagi, after receiving a fee, colluded with the opponents and later accepted a brief from them to file a suit against the same grandson. The State Bar Council di

SHEILA B. DASversusP.R. SUGASREE

2006 INSC 9217 February 2006Disposed off

The parties were married under the Special Marriage Act and had a daughter born in 1990. The mother left the matrimonial home with the child in 2000, prompting the father to file a habeas corpus petition and applications under Sections 7 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and Section 6 of the Hindu Minority an

KOMAL KRISHAN ARORA & ORS.versusSANDEEP KUMAR & ORS.

2025 INSC 112316 September 2025Disposed off

The father filed a habeas corpus petition after the mother left India with their daughter and allegedly left their five‑year‑old son with the maternal grandparents without informing him, violating UK High Court video‑call orders. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana directed that interim custody of the son be handed over

LAHARI SAKHAMURIversusSOBHAN KODALI

2019 INSC 38315 March 2019Disposed off

The wife filed for divorce and custody of her US‑citizen children in a US court, which issued an interim order directing the father to appear for conciliation and later granted him temporary physical custody, ordering the children be returned to the US. She then travelled to India and, concealing the US proceedings, fi

HARSHITA BHASINversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

2016 INSC 112914 December 2016Disposed off

Mukul Bhasin and Harshita Bhasin, married in 2007, separated in 2013 and have two minor children aged eight and five. The husband filed a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 for dissolution of marriage and custody, while the wife filed a habeas corpus petition. The Calcutta High Court refused interim custo

DEEPTI BHANDARIversusNITIN BHANDARI & ANR.

2011 INSC 84414 December 2011Disposed off

The case involved a matrimonial dispute between Depti Bhandari and Nitin Bhandari, centering on visitation rights to their minor daughter after the mother shifted residence from Jaipur to Delhi. The father had been granted visitation rights in Jaipur, but the mother sought to modify the order to allow visitation in Del

SHYAMRAO MAROTI KORWATEversusDEEPAK KISANRAO TEKAM

2010 INSC 60914 September 2010Case Partly allowed

After the mother died shortly after giving birth, the child was placed with his maternal grandfather, who applied for guardianship under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The father also filed a petition for custody under the same Act. The District Judge appointed the grandfather as guardian until the child turned 12,

RAJESWARI CHANDRASEKAR GANESHversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2022 INSC 72114 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The petition filed by a mother under Article 32 sought a writ of habeas corpus to compel the father to return their two minor children, who were US residents, from India to the United States in accordance with a shared parenting plan ordered by an Ohio court. The Supreme Court examined whether a writ of habeas corpus i

G H JASMEET KAURversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

2019 INSC 136112 December 2019Disposed off

The petitioner, a U.S. citizen, married a U.S. citizen husband and had two children who are U.S. citizens. After a visit to India, the petitioner refused to return to the United States with the children, prompting the husband to obtain custody orders in a Connecticut Superior Court and later file a habeas corpus petiti

MAUSAMI MOITRA GANGULIversusJAYANT GANGULI

2008 INSC 63612 May 2008Dismissed

Mausami Moitra Ganguli and Jayant Ganguli were married in 1996 and had a son in 1998. The mother left the matrimonial home in 2001 due to alleged domestic violence, leaving the three‑year‑old child with the father. After a divorce decree in 2002, the mother filed a petition under Sections 10 and 25 of the Guardians and

SWAMINATHAN KUNCHU ACHARYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2022 INSC 6399 June 2022Appeal(s) allowed

A five‑year‑old boy lost his parents to COVID‑19. The paternal grandfather filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking custody of the child, who was then staying with his maternal aunt. The Gujarat High Court ordered custody to be transferred to the aunt, citing her younger age, income and larger family. On appeal, the Supre

SUMANLAL CHHOTALAL KAMDAR ETC.versusMISS ASHA TRILOKBHAI SHAH ETC.

1995 INSC 3489 May 1995Disposed off

Social workers appealed against a district judge’s order that appointed a Norwegian couple as guardian of a child from an orphanage under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, with the superintendent acting as power of attorney holder. The Supreme Court examined whether the adoption complied with the guidelin

SMT. ANOKHAversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

2003 INSC 6958 December 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The widowed mother, Smt. Anokha, consented to the adoption of her infant daughter Alka by an Italian couple who had known the family for years. The couple filed a petition under Sections 7, 10 and 17 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, submitting extensive evidence of their suitability. The District Judge and the Raj

NIL RATAN KUNDU & ANR.versusABHIJIT KUNDU

2008 INSC 9208 August 2008Case Allowed

The case concerned an application by the father, Abhijit Kundu, for custody of his six‑year‑old son Antariksh, while the child was in the care of his maternal grandparents who had lodged an FIR against the father under Sections 498A and 304 IPC for the alleged murder of the mother. The trial court and the Calcutta High

STEPHANIE JOAN BECKERversusSTATE AND ORS.

2013 INSC 848 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Stephanie Joan Becker, an American citizen, applied under Sections 7 and 26 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, to be appointed guardian of a 10‑year‑old Indian orphan named Tina and to take her abroad for adoption. The trial court and the Delhi High Court rejected the applications, holding that Becker, at 53 years o

NAGAIAH AND ANOTHERversusSMT. CHOWDAMMA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 68 January 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, two brothers, filed a suit in 1985 seeking a declaration that they were entitled to two‑thirds of a family property and that a sale deed executed by their father in favour of the second defendant was not binding on their share. The suit was filed on behalf of the younger brother, who was a minor at the

SOMPRABHA RANA & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2024 INSC 6646 September 2024Case Partly allowed

The case concerned a two‑year‑seven‑month‑old girl whose mother died in an unnatural death. The child had been in the care of her maternal aunts and grandparents since she was 11 months old. The father, who had been arrested and later released on bail, filed a habeas‑corpus petition before the Madhya Pradesh High Court

ABCversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2015 INSC 4826 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

An unwed Christian mother filed a petition under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, seeking to be appointed guardian of her five‑year‑old son. The Guardian Court dismissed the petition because the mother refused to disclose the name and address of the child’s putative father, holding that Section 11 requir

LAKSHMI KANT PANDEYversusUNION OF INDIA

1984 INSC 266 February 1984Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ petition filed by advocate Laxmi Kant Pandey, seeking to restrain private agencies from sending Indian children abroad for adoption and to direct the Union, the Indian Council of Social Welfare and the Indian Council of Child Welfare to fulfill their duties. Relying

THRITY HOSHIE DOLIKUKAversusHOSHIAM SHAVAKSHA DOLIKUKA

1982 INSC 614 August 1982Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered the custody of an 11‑year‑old daughter, Gospi, of a divorced Parsi couple. The lower courts had awarded custody to the father, but the mother appealed, arguing that the child's welfare required her custody and continued education in a boarding school. The Court held that the welfare of the

MOHTASHEM BILLAH MALIKversusSANA AFTAB

2026 INSC 1184 February 2026Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute involved the custody of two minor sons of an Indian couple married under Muslim Personal Law and residing in Qatar. After a divorce, the Qatar court granted custody of the children to the mother and guardianship to the father, but later revoked the mother's custody when she removed the children to India wit

NITHYA ANAND RAGHAVANversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

2017 INSC 12953 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The mother, Nithya Anand Raghavan, removed her seven‑year‑old daughter Nethra from the United Kingdom to India and the father filed a writ of habeas corpus in Delhi seeking the child's production and compliance with a UK court order directing her return. The Delhi High Court ordered the mother to produce the child and

MOHAN KUMAR RAYANAversusKOMAL MOHAN RAYANA

2007 INSC 11191 November 2007Disposed off

Mohan Kumar Rayana and Komal Mohan Rayana, a married couple, separated after the birth of their daughter Anisha. The mother obtained custody of the child from the Family Court, while the father was granted limited visitation rights. The Bombay High Court subsequently reduced the father's access, directed both parents t

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search