Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8
Shelarbhai Bachubhai Dakhada applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116(b)). The State opposed the bail, citing the …
Sudersun Chemical Pvt Ltd and its associate filed a special civil application seeking to quash two orders that revoked an exemption granted to them under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The petitioners argued that the authorities failed to provide the Forensic Science Laboratory report along with …
Vijaybhai R. Boriya applied for successive regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS after a chargesheet was filed for alleged offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Section 111(3) of the BNS, 2023. He had been in custody since 7 May 2026 and claimed he played no vital role in the …
Hemang Bhadreshbhai Pathak was arrested in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11203055250397 of 2025) for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and the B.N.S. Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming confinement since 30‑03‑2026 and asserting that he …
Shaileshbhai Maganbhai Chauhan applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS for offences alleged under Section 111(3) of the BNS and several provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. He had been in custody since 2 May 2026 and argued that he played no vital role and that no material …
The petitioner, Mehulpur, applied for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before a charge-sheet was filed, alleging offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The State opposed, arguing the offences were serious. The court examined factors such as the applicant's short …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging violations of Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81 and 83 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The Court …
The appellant's vehicle was seized under the Gujarat Prohibition Act after the driver was found carrying liquor well beyond the permissible limit. The appellant filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution with the High Court seeking the vehicle's release, without …
