Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MEHULBHAI S/O. JITMALBHAI BHARUBHAI BARJODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Decided
Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The court held that regular bail should be granted, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Mehulpur, applied for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before a charge-sheet was filed, alleging offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The State opposed, arguing the offences were serious. The court examined factors such as the applicant's short incarceration, completion of investigation, lack of prior record, and the nature of the alleged involvement in illegal liquor transport. Finding that discretion should be exercised, the court granted bail on a personal bond of Rs.10,000 with one surety, imposing conditions including surrender of passport, residence reporting, and monthly police check‑ins. The order also allowed the lower court to modify conditions and directed that any breach could lead to warrant issuance.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted under Section 439 CrPC before the filing of a charge‑sheet for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act
  • Whether the facts and circumstances justify the exercise of judicial discretion to grant bail despite the seriousness of the alleged offences

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • Section 439
  • Gujarat Prohibition Act
  • pre‑charge‑sheet bail
  • criminal procedure
  • liquor prohibition

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/12004/2026                       ORDER DATED: 25/05/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
                 CHARGESHEET) NO. 12004 of 2026

==========================================================
             MEHULBHAI S/O. JITMALBHAI BHARUBHAI BARJOD
                                Versus
                         STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR DHAWAN JAYSWAL, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:              HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI
                           Date : 25/05/2026
                            ORAL ORDER

1.      Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned
        APP for the respondent – State.


2.      By this application filed under Section 439 of the Code
        of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant is seeking
        release on regular bail in connection with the FIR
        being C.R. No. 11821048260548 of 2026, registered
        with Sukhsar Police Station, District: Dahod, for the
        offences punishable under Sections 65(e), 81, 98(2)
        and 116-B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949.


3.      Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that, the
        applicant is not involved in commission of offence as
        alleged in the FIR and therefore, looking to the role of
        the applicant and nature of the allegations, the
        applicant is required to be enlarged on regular bail by
        imposing suitable terms and conditions.



                                Page 1 of 4
     R/CR.MA/12004/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 25/05/2026




4.      On the other hand, learned APP appearing for the
        respondent – State vehemently submits that, the
        offences, which have been charged, are serious in
        nature affecting the society at large and looking to the
        facts as well as the allegations made against the
        applicant, no discretion would be required to be
        exercised.


5.      In the facts and circumstances of the case and
        considering the nature of allegations, this Court is of
        the opinion that, discretion is required to be exercised
        to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. This Court has
        considered        the    following       facts        while   exercising
        discretion in favour of the applicant :-


        (i)     the applicant is in jail since 04.05.2026;


        (ii)    though,    the    charge-sheet           is    not    filed,    the
                investigation is substantially over;


        (iii)   no past antecedent;


        (iv)    the applicant is alleged to have been instrumental
                in illegal transportation of the liquor;


6.      In view of the aforesaid facts, without discussing the
        evidence in detail, this Court, prima facie, is of the


                                   Page 2 of 4
R/CR.MA/12004/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 25/05/2026




   opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the discretion
   and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence,
   present application is allowed and the applicant is
   ordered to be released on regular bail in connection
   with the FIR being C.R. No. 11821048260548 of 2026,
   registered        with   Sukhsar           Police   Station,       District:
   Dahod, on executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/-
   (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one surety of the like
   amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court
   and subject to the conditions that he shall;


   [a]     not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse
           liberty;


   [b]     not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the
           prosecution;


   [c]     surrender passport, if any, to the lower court
           within a week;


   [d]     not leave India without prior permission of the
           Sessions Judge concerned;


   [e]     furnish     latest    address         of    residence       to    the
           Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the
           time of execution of the bond and shall not
           change the residence without prior permission of


                                Page 3 of 4
       R/CR.MA/12004/2026                                                     ORDER DATED: 25/05/2026




                    the trial Court;


            [f]     mark his presence before the concerned police
                    station in the first week of every month till the
                    trial is over;


  7.        The Authorities will release the applicant only if the
            applicant is not required in connection with any other
            offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above
            conditions             is      committed,               the        Sessions            Judge
            concerned will be free to issue warrant or take
            appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be
            executed before the learned Lower Court having
            jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the
            concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of
            the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the
            trial, learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the
            observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at
            this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the
            applicant on bail.


  8.        Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct
            service is permitted.

                                                                               (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)
  UMESH/-


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: CHAVDA UMESH(HC00203), Principal pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 25/05/2026 12:48:29




                                                  Page 4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.