Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Hindu Marriage Act, 1956

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

APARNA GOYALversusRAKESH GOYAL

2009 INSC 7327 January 2009Disposed off

In a matrimonial dispute between Aparna Goyal (wife) and Rakesh Goyal (husband), the parties appeared before the Supreme Court Lok Adalat on 6 December 2008 and, with the help of mediators, reached a settlement. The settlement provided that the husband would pay Rs.10,00,000 to the wife as full and final settlement of

KIRAN RAJU PENUMACHAversusTEJUSWINI CHOWDHURY

2025 INSC 35817 March 2025Disposed off

The appellant-father and respondent-mother obtained a mutual consent divorce, with the mother given permanent custody of their son and the father granted interim weekend custody. The father later filed an execution petition to enforce the decree, while the mother filed an application seeking modification of the interim

DEEPAK JAINversusCHARU JAIN

2007 INSC 28914 March 2007Dismissed

The appellant, Deepak Jain, appealed against a Delhi High Court order that had affirmed an Additional District Judge’s order granting him interim maintenance of Rs 12,000 per month and litigation expenses of Rs 11,000 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956. The Supreme Court examined whether the trial court’s

MRS. PAYAL ASHOK KUMAR JINDALversusCAPT. ASHOK KUMAR JINDAL

1992 INSC 1506 May 1992Appeal(s) allowed

Mrs. Payal Jindal married Capt. Ashok Kumar Jindal on 24 January 1988. The husband filed a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on 16 August 1988 alleging cruelty. The wife denied the allegations and sought transfer of the case from the Family Court, Pune to Delhi, obtaining a temporary stay

PRIYA VRAT SINGH & ORS.versusSHYAM JI SAHAI

2008 INSC 9065 August 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Priya Vrat Singh and others, sought to quash criminal proceedings filed under Sections 494, 120B and 109 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry harassment and bigamy. The High Court had dismissed their Section 482 CrPC application, but the Supreme Court examined w

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search