Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Indian Majority Act, 1875

13 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

NOORSABA KHATOONversusMOHAD. QUASIM

1997 INSC 58029 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Noorsaba Khatoon, a Muslim woman, filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking maintenance for herself and her three minor children after being deserted by her husband, Mohd. Quasim, who later divorced her and took a second wife. The trial court ordered maintenance for the wife an

PRABHU DAYAL SESMAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

1986 INSC 18028 August 1986Dismissed

The Rajasthan Public Service Commission advertised a direct recruitment exam for the Rajasthan Administrative Service in 1983, stipulating that candidates must be at least 21 years old on 1 January 1984 and must not have attained the age of 28 on that same day. The appellant, born on 2 January 1956, was initially allow

GOPAL PRASADversusBIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 40828 May 2020Matter referred to larger bench

Gopal Prasad, appointed as Calligraphist‑cum‑Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board in May 1970 at the age of 15½, was retired in May 2012 on the ground that he had completed 42 years of qualifying service, despite the statutory retirement age being 60 years. The Board had earlier resolved in 2004 to treat the

KIRTIKANT D. VADODARIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

1996 INSC 58526 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kirtikant Vadodaria, challenged a maintenance order granted to his step‑mother, Manjulaben, under Section 125(1)(d) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The trial court, sessions court and Gujarat High Court had held that a step‑mother could claim maintenance from her step‑son. The Supreme Court examined the

MATHAI MATHAIversusJOSEPH MARY @ MARYKKUTIY JOSEPH & ORS.

2014 INSC 32625 April 2014Dismissed

The appellant claimed to be a deemed tenant under Section 4A of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, relying on a mortgage deed executed in 1909‑1910 in favour of his mother as collateral for a dowry. The Supreme Court held that the mortgagee (the appellant's mother) was a minor of 15 years at the time of execution and w

EERATI LAXMANversusSTATE OF A.P.

2009 INSC 6123 January 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Eerati Laxman was convicted of murder under s.302 IPC for killing Pittala Chandrakala on 9 May 1994 and sentenced to life imprisonment. He contended that he was a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986, claiming his birth date was 10 May 1978, and thus had not attained the age of 16 at the time of the offence. T

RAJATHIversusC. GANESAN

1999 INSC 28622 July 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant wife filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking maintenance, alleging that her husband, who had sufficient means, had neglected and refused to maintain her and was living with another woman. The husband contended that the wife could not prove a second marriage under Section

PRADEEP KUMAR SONTHALIAversusDHIRAJ PRASAD SAHU @ DHIRAJ SAHU & ANR.

2020 INSC 71018 December 2020Disposed off

In the biennial Rajya Sabha election from Jharkhand, MLA Amit Kumar Mahto cast his vote at 9:15 a.m. on 23 March 2018, but was convicted later that afternoon. The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Sonthalia, challenged the validity of that vote, arguing that the conviction rendered Mahto disqualified under Article 191(1)(e) of

MST. ZOHARA KHATOONversusMOHD. IBRAHIM

1981 INSC 3918 February 1981Appeal(s) allowed

Zohra Khatoon, the legally married wife of Mohd. Ibrahim, filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for maintenance for herself and her minor child after the husband neglected her. The trial magistrate granted Rs.100 per month to both, but the High Court quashed the maintenance for the wif

GITHA HARIHARAN AND ANR .versusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.

1999 INSC 6617 February 1999Disposed off

The petitioners, a mother and father, applied to the Reserve Bank of India for relief bonds in their minor son's name, with the mother signing as guardian. RBI rejected the application, insisting on the father's signature or a guardianship certificate, relying on Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act,

NEELAM GUPTA & ORS.versusRAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA & ANR.

2024 INSC 76914 October 2024

The plaintiff, Rajendra Kumar Gupta, claimed ownership of a 7.60‑acre parcel of land in Mowa village, asserting that he purchased it by a registered sale deed in 1968 and had peacefully possessed it until dispossessed in 1983. The defendants, his cousins, contended that the land was joint Hindu family property, that th

AMARENDRA KUMAR PAULversusMAYA PAUL & ORS.

2009 INSC 10094 August 2009Dismissed

The husband appealed against a magistrate's order granting maintenance to his wife and three children under Section 125 of the CrPC. The children, who were minors when the order was made, later attained majority or married, and the wife filed execution applications seeking arrears for periods after those events. The lo

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search