Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Indian Medical Council Act, 1956

111 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

TAMIL NADU MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2018 INSC 33231 August 2020Disposed off

The petitions challenged the validity of Regulation 9 of the Medical Council of India (MCI) Post‑Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, alleging that it barred State governments from reserving seats for in‑service doctors in postgraduate degree courses. The Court examined the constitutional distribution of power

SHRI GANGAJALI EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 83231 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed

Shri Gangajali Education Society applied to the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MHFW) for a Letter of Permission to start a medical college. The Medical Council of India (MCI) found several deficiencies and recommended rejection, but the Supreme Court‑constituted Oversight Committee (OC) later accepted the college

PADMASHREE DR. D.Y. PATIL MEDICAL COLLEGEversusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR.

2015 INSC 62131 August 2015Dismissed

Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College applied to the Central Government for an increase in MBBS seats for the 2015-16 academic session but failed to attach the mandatory essentiality certificate, resulting in the application’s rejection. The college sought condonation of the delay and a direction for its applicatio

SUKH SAGAR MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 47431 July 2020Dismissed

The Gujarat Sukh Sagar Medical College & Hospital Trust obtained an Essentiality Certificate in 2014 to establish a medical college in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. Despite conditional permission for the 2016‑17 academic year, the Medical Council of India (MCI) repeatedly denied renewal of permission for three successive s

KANACHUR ISLAMIC EDUCATION TRUST (R)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 82430 August 2017Case Allowed

The Kanachur Islamic Education Trust sought confirmation of the conditional Letter of Permission (LOP) granted to its medical college for the 2016-17 academic year and extension for 2017-18, after the Union of India and the Medical Council of India (MCI) debarred the college and ordered encashment of its bank guarantee

DR. JAGAT NARAIN SUBHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 82530 August 2017Case Allowed

The Dr. Jagat Narain Subharti Charitable Trust applied for permission to establish a new medical college in Dehradun for the 2016‑17 session. The Medical Council of India (MCI) flagged deficiencies in faculty, residents, OPD attendance, bed occupancy and questioned land‑ownership compliance, leading the Central Governm

ANEESH D. LAWANDE & OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF GOA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 58030 August 2013Disposed off

The petitioners, students admitted to postgraduate medical and dental courses in Goa on the basis of NEET ranks, challenged the State of Goa's order cancelling their admissions after the Supreme Court had protected those admissions. The Supreme Court held that the State could not rescind the NEET‑based admissions, as t

RAJAN PUROHIT & ORS.versusRAJASTHAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE & ORS.

2012 INSC 36330 August 2012Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined admissions to a private unaided medical college in Rajasthan where 117 students were admitted without a competitive entrance test, contrary to Regulation 5(2) of the MCI Regulations. The Court held that there was no consensual agreement between the college and the State to admit students on t

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusTHE CHAIRMAN, S. R. EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST & ANR.

2018 INSC 101429 October 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The Medical Council of India (MCI) appealed against a Kerala High Court order that quashed the Government of India's decision to deny renewal of permission and admission to several medical colleges on the ground of gross deficiencies. The Supreme Court examined whether the Hearing Committee’s recommendation to review c

STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHERversusMISS BHAVNA TIWARI & ORS.

2025 INSC 74729 April 2025Disposed off

The petitioners, the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Director General of Medical Education, challenged a High Court order that awarded Rs.10,00,000 each to two NEET‑PG aspirants alleging seat‑blocking during counselling. The aspirants claimed that the mop‑up round denied them the opportunity to secure their preferred MD

THE NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSIONversusPOOJA THANDU NARESH & ORS.

2022 INSC 49429 April 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a student who obtained an MBBS degree from a Chinese university, where the tenth‑semester clinical training was delivered online due to COVID‑19, is entitled to provisional registration by the National Medical Commission (NMC). The Court held that the Eligibility Regulations require t

MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 37429 April 2020Disposed off

The petitioners, a group of unaided minority medical and dental colleges, challenged the validity of the NEET (National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test) notifications issued by the Medical Council of India and Dental Council of India, arguing that the uniform entrance examination violated their fundamental rights under A

GOSTHO BEHARI DASversusDIPAK KUMAR SANYAL & ORS.

2023 INSC 65328 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a registered medical practitioner, was found to have willfully defied demolition orders concerning an unauthorised building extension and was subsequently held in contempt of court, leading the High Court to suspend his licence to practise medicine. The appellant challenged the suspension, arguing that t

SUKUMAR MUKHERJEE ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

1993 INSC 24627 July 1993Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the West Bengal Health Service Act, 1990 and the West Bengal Health Service Rules, 1993, rejecting challenges that the statutes were beyond the State's legislative competence and violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The Court held that the Act merely regulates conditions of se

SURENDRA CHAUHANversusSTATE OF M.P

2000 INSC 15027 March 2000Case Partly allowed

Surendra Chauhan, who had an illicit relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman named Alpana, took her to the clinic of Dr. Ravindra Sharma, an unqualified electro‑homeopathic practitioner, for an abortion. Alpana died during the procedure, and Chauhan later confessed to her mother that he had arranged the abortion. The tri

STATE OF M.P. & ANR.versusSURESH NARAYAN VIJAYVARGIYA & ORS.

2014 INSC 15127 February 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court had earlier issued interim orders directing that MBBS seats in private medical colleges in Madhya Pradesh be shared with the State Government on a 50:50 basis, after excluding a 15% NRI quota. The respondents‑private colleges admitted all 150 seats for the 2011‑12 academic year without sharing, and la

DALJIT SINGH GUJRAL & ORS.versusJAGJIT SINGH ARORA & ORS.

2014 INSC 14927 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, managers of INSCOL Multispecialty Hospital, were charged with medical negligence, cheating, forgery and other offences after the complainant alleged that his wife died due to wrong treatment at the hospital. The Punjab & Haryana High Court single judge framed the issue on the premise that the patient di

AYURVEDIC ENLISTED DOCTOR'S ASSON., MUMBAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2009 INSC 28727 February 2009Dismissed

The petitioners, Ayurvedic practitioners enlisted in the Bihar State Register but lacking recognised qualifications under the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, claimed a constitutional right to practice throughout India under Article 19(1)(g) and Section 29 of the Central Act, asserting that inclusion in a Sta

RAVINDRA KUMAR RAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1998 INSC 11627 February 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner sought a writ directing the State of Maharashtra to hold a Common Entrance Examination for admission to its medical colleges, invoking Regulation 5(2) of the Medical Council of India’s 1997 Regulations. Maharashtra argued it fell under Regulation 5(3) because the CBSE board contributed only a small fract

ARTI SAPRUversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & OTHERS

1981 INSC 5027 February 1981Case Allowed

The petitioners, who were denied admission to the MBBS courses of the Government Medical Colleges in Srinagar and Jammu for 1980‑81, challenged the State's reservation policy that earmarked 17% of seats for "rectification of regional imbalances" by classifying certain villages as socially and educationally backward. Th

APOLLO COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINEversusRAJASTHAN STATE VETERINARY COUNCIL & ORS.

2014 INSC 98525 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether private veterinary colleges offering the B.V.Sc. & A.H. course must be recognized by the Central Government under the First Schedule of the Veterinary Council of India Act, 1984. Apollo College of Veterinary Medicine and Mahatma Gandhi College had been affiliated to a university and t

D.K. JOSHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2000 INSC 24625 April 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a public‑interest writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to take action against unqualified and unregistered medical practitioners operating in Agra district. The High Court dismissed the petition on the ground that the Chief Medical Officer

TAMIL NADU MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2018 INSC 33224 April 2018Disposed off

The Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association challenged Regulation 9(iv) and 9(vii) of the Post‑Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, alleging that the provisions barred states from creating a separate entry stream for in‑service doctors seeking postgraduate degree seats and were violative of Articles 14 and 19(

V. N. PUBLIC HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS. ETC.

2021 INSC 11724 February 2021Dismissed

The appellant, V.N. Public Health and Educational Trust, sought an Essentiality Certificate (EC) and Consent of Affiliation (CoA) to start a medical college for the academic year 2020‑2021, but the State Government and Kerala University of Health Sciences repeatedly rejected its applications citing deficiencies. The Hi

BAHARUL ISLAM & ORS.versusINDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND ORS.

2023 INSC 8124 January 2023

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004, which created a regulatory authority to register diploma holders in medicine and to regulate their practice in rural Assam. The Court held that the Act was beyond the legislative competence of the Assam State Legi

P.C. KESAVAN KUTTYNAYAR ETC. ETCversusHARISH BHALLA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 50723 September 2003

The Supreme Court examined whether the Central Government could grant permission to increase student intake or renew permission for medical colleges in contravention of Sections 10‑A and 10‑B of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and the regulations framed by the Medical Council of India (MCI). The petitioners allege

P.C. KESAVAN KUTTYNAYAR ETC. ETCversusHARSH BHALLA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 50823 September 2003

The Supreme Court examined whether the Central Government could grant permission to increase student intake or renew admission permissions for medical colleges without the colleges complying with the requirements of Sections 10‑A and 10‑B of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and the regulations framed by the Medical

PRANAY KUMAR PODDERversusSTATE OF TRIPURA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 26423 March 2017

The appellants, two candidates who scored the required marks for MBBS admission, were declared ineligible on the ground of partial colour‑vision deficiency (CVD). They challenged the decision of the Medical Council of India (MCI) and the State of Tripura before the High Court, which dismissed their writ petition, holdi

PONNAIYAH RAMAJAYAM INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 97822 September 2017Disposed off

The Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Institute of Medical Sciences (PRIMS) applied for a Letter of Permission (LOP) to start a new medical college for the 2016‑17 academic year and sought renewal for 2017‑18. Conditional LOP was granted for 2016‑17, but subsequent inspections by the Medical Council of India (MCI) revealed persisten

STATE OF M.P. AND ANR.versusKUMARI NIVEDITA JAIN AND ORS.

1981 INSC 17022 September 1981Appeal(s) allowed

The Madhya Pradesh Government issued an executive order on 9 September 1980 that completely removed the minimum qualifying‑marks requirement for candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) when selecting them for seats reserved in state medical colleges. Nivedita Jain, a general‑category can

DR. A.K. SABHAPATHYversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 11722 April 1992Case Partly allowed

Dr. A.K. Sabhapathy challenged Kerala's use of the first proviso in Section 38 of the Travancore‑Cochin Medical Practitioners' Act, 1953, which allowed the State to exempt certain persons from the registration requirements for practising modern (allopathic) medicine. The State had issued notifications (May 4 1977, Sept

MOHAMED IBRAHIM AND ORS.versusVINAYAKA MISSION UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

2012 INSC 9922 February 2012Dismissed

The petitioners, students who completed a medical course at Vinayaka Mission University's off‑shore campus in Bangkok, sought to appear for the Medical Council of India's screening test, claiming their provisional MBBS certificate qualified as a primary medical qualification. The High Court Single Judge allowed their a

SHIRISH GOVIND PRABHUDESAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 28921 October 1992Disposed off

The petitioners, students admitted to a medical college not recognised by the Medical Council of India (MCI), sought migration to a recognised college after passing the first MBBS examination. The Director of Medical Education refused, citing a condition that only students from recognised colleges are eligible for migr

DINESH KUMAR & ORS.versusMOTILAL NEHRU MEDICAL COLLEGE, ALLAHABAD & ORS

1986 INSC 14921 July 1986Modified

The Supreme Court revisited its earlier judgment on reservation in medical colleges, directing that at least 15% of MBBS/BDS seats and 25% of postgraduate seats in each college be filled through an All‑India Entrance Examination conducted in English. It modified the formula for non‑reserved seats, rejecting state deman

CHANDRA MOHAN VARMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 7021 January 2020Dismissed

Chandra Mohan Varma, a Professor of Cardiology in a Uttar Pradesh government medical college, retired on attaining the age of 60 on 13 August 2014. He was granted a ‘session ending benefit’ extending his service until 30 June 2015 under a Government Order dated 19 November 2012. While he was on this extension, the Stat

ROYAL MEDICAL TRUST(REGD)ANDANOTHER.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER.

2015 INSC 58820 August 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the disapproval of applications by the Central Government and the Medical Council of India (MCI) for new medical colleges, increase in MBBS seats, and renewal of existing permissions for the 2014‑15 academic year. The Court held that before any adverse decision under Section 10A of the Indian

STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.versusRAMESH CHANDRA AND ANR. ETC.

1997 INSC 29620 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Chaudhary, originally appointed as an Associate Professor of Neurosurgery on an ad‑hoc basis, was later promoted to Professor. Dr. Ramesh Chandra challenged the promotion, arguing that Chaudhary lacked the requisite qualifications under the Indian Medical Council Regulations (IMCR) 1971, specifically the two‑year "

DR. AMBESH KUMAR ETC. ETC.versusPRINCIPAL, LLRM MEDICAL COLLEGE MEERUT AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1986 INSC 27519 December 1986Dismissed

The Uttar Pradesh Government issued an order on 15 December 1982 requiring candidates for postgraduate medical degree courses to have at least 55% marks in MBBS and for diploma courses at least 52% before they could be considered for merit‑based admission. Several candidates denied admission challenged the order before

DR. SADHNA DEVI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 15819 February 1997Disposed off

The petitioners, general‑category medical graduates, challenged a Uttar Pradesh Government circular dated 31‑August‑1995 that removed the requirement of a minimum 35% qualifying mark for SC/ST/OBC candidates in the entrance test for postgraduate medical courses. They argued that the circular violated the Indian Medical

DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR MEDICAL COLLEGE & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2013 INSC 63618 September 2013Dismissed

Private unaided medical colleges challenged a corrigendum (Notification No. 37(1) 2013) that limited the "Enhancement of Annual Intake Capacity" regulations of 2013 to Government medical colleges, alleging violation of Article 14. The Central Government, citing a delay in receiving the original regulations, extended th

CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2013 INSC 48218 July 2013Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India (MCI) and the Dental Council of India (DCI) that introduced a single National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to MBBS, BDS and postgraduate medical courses. Petitioners, including Christian Medical College Vellore an

CHOWDHURY NAVIN HEMABHAI & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2011 INSC 13818 February 2011Disposed off

The appellants, students belonging to SC, ST and OBC categories, secured the required 40% marks in the qualifying examination but scored less than 40% in the Gujarat common entrance test for MBBS admission in 2008‑2009. They were admitted to the MBBS course under Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Colleges Rules,

YASH AHUJA AND OTHERSversusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS.

2009 INSC 114617 September 2009Dismissed

The petitioners, Indian citizens who obtained MBBS degrees from Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara (recognised under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956), were denied permanent registration by the Medical Council of India (MCI) because they had not passed the screening test mandated by the Act. They challeng

COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTUREversusMR. MUKESH GOYAL & ORS.

2020 INSC 29817 March 2020Case Partly allowed

The Council of Architecture challenged NOIDA's Promotion Policy 2005, which allowed promotion to the post of Associate Architect without requiring a degree recognised by the Council. The issue was whether Section 37 of the Architects Act, 1972 bars unregistered persons from practising architectural activities and wheth

MAHARAJA AGRASEN HOSPITAL & ORS.versusMASTER RISHABH SHARMA & ORS.

2019 INSC 137816 December 2019Disposed off

The case arose from a complaint by the mother of a pre‑term baby who became totally blind due to alleged failure to screen for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP). The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held the hospital and three doctors negligent and awarded Rs. 64,00,000 in compensation. On appeal, the Sup

SANJEEV GUPTA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2004 INSC 64716 November 2004Dismissed

The case concerned Indian medical graduates who obtained their MBBS‑equivalent degrees from institutions in the former USSR and sought provisional or permanent registration to practice medicine in India. The petitioners argued that, under the pre‑amendment Indian Medical Council Act, they were entitled to registration

HARISH VERMA AND ORS.versusAJAY SRIVASTAVA AND ANR.

2003 INSC 48516 September 2003Appeal(s) allowed

In-service doctors employed by the State of Rajasthan challenged the first proviso of Regulation 9 of the Post‑Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, which fixed a minimum qualifying mark of 50% for general candidates and 40% for reserved categories for admission to postgraduate medical courses. The Rajasthan Hi

STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusDR. DINESH SINGH CHAUHAN

2016 INSC 60416 August 2016Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of a Uttar Pradesh Government Order that reserved 30% of postgraduate medical degree seats for in‑service doctors, a scheme challenged as violative of Regulation 9 of the Medical Council of India (MCI) Post‑Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000. The Court held that Regulat

SAMIRA KOHLIversusDR. PRABHA MANCHANDA & ANR.

2008 INSC 5616 January 2008Case Allowed

The appellant, a 44‑year‑old unmarried woman, was admitted for a diagnostic laparoscopy but, while under general anaesthesia, the respondent doctors performed an abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‑oophorectomy without her informed consent. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed her cla

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.

1996 INSC 7015 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The second respondent, who held an M.Sc. in Medical Biochemistry and worked as a professor, applied to be entered in the State Medical Register but was denied because he lacked an MBBS degree. He obtained a writ order from the Rajasthan High Court directing his registration, which was later set aside by the High Court

KARPAGAM FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES . AND RESEARCHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 90414 September 2017Disposed off

The appellant, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences & Research, challenged the Central Government's order that barred it from admitting MBBS students for the 2017‑18 session and denied recognition under Section 11(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. The college argued that successive inspections by the Medical

PRE P.G. MEDICAL SANGARSH COMMITTEE AND ANR.versusDR. BAJRANG SONI AND ORS.

2001 INSC 36514 August 2001Dismissed

The State Government of Rajasthan fixed a minimum qualifying mark of 33% for in‑service doctors and increased the reservation of seats for them in postgraduate medical courses from 25% to 50% of the remaining seats. Private candidates challenged these measures as violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, arg

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusSILAS NELSON AND ORS.

1993 INSC 20314 May 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the application of Silas Nelson, who sought migration from an unrecognised medical college in Dar‑es‑Salam to a recognised Indian medical college. The Medical Council of India (MCI) had rejected the migration, finding insufficient grounds and lack of equivalence, a decision the High Court lat

UNION OF INDIAversusINDIAN RADIOLOGICAL AND IMAGING ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2018 INSC 23614 March 2018Disposed off

The Union of India appealed against a Delhi High Court judgment that struck down Rule 3.3(1)(b) of the PCPNDT Rules, 1996 and Rule 6 of the Six‑Months Training Rules, 2014 on the ground that the Act did not empower the Central Government to prescribe qualifications or training for persons using ultrasound equipment. Th

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONversusV.P. SHANTHA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 72013 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether medical services rendered by doctors, hospitals and nursing homes fall within the definition of "service" under Section 2(1)(o) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and thus attract consumer‑redress. It held that services provided for consideration – even if partially free or paid th

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusN.C. MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL & ORS.

2018 INSC 81713 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The Medical Council of India (MCI) appealed against a Punjab & Haryana High Court order that allowed N.C. Medical College to admit 150 MBBS students for the 2018‑19 session. The High Court had directed the Central Government to grant permission by 31 May 2018, relying on a government order issued under that interim dir

MAJOR S D SINGH MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2017 INSC 88813 September 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a writ petition filed by Major S.D. Singh Medical College and Hospital challenging the Union Government’s order, based on the Medical Council of India’s (MCI) recommendation, that barred the college from admitting MBBS students for the 2017‑18 academic year and directed the encashment of a Rs

CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2013 INSC 34413 May 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of a 2010 notification issued by the Medical Council of India (MCI) introducing the National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to postgraduate medical courses across India. Petitioners challenged the MCI's competence under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, to imp

KERALA AYURVEDA PARAMPARYA VAIDYA FORUMversusSTATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 33613 April 2018Dismissed

The Kerala Ayurveda Paramparya Vaidya Forum, an association of traditional practitioners of Ayurveda, Siddha and Unani, challenged the Travancore‑Cochin Medical Practitioners Act, 1953 which barred them from practising unless they were registered under the Act. The Forum argued that they had long‑standing custom, inher

K.S. BHOIRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2001 INSC 60512 December 2001Dismissed

The Maharashtra Health Sciences Common Entrance Test of 2001 contained errors in the biology paper of one version, leading the State to re‑evaluate answer sheets and issue a revised merit list that displaced several already admitted students. To accommodate the displaced candidates, the State Government sought a one‑ti

ROYAL MEDICAL TRUST AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 88912 September 2017Disposed off

The Royal Medical Trust, which runs Kerala Medical College, applied for a Letter of Permission (LOP) to admit 150 MBBS students for the 2017‑18 academic year. After a surprise inspection by the Medical Council of India (MCI) revealed several deficiencies, the Central Government barred the college from admissions and au

VARUNARJUN TRUST & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2017 INSC 89012 September 2017Disposed off

The petitioners, Varunarjun Trust, applied for a new medical college and were granted a conditional Letter of Permission (LOP) for the 2016‑17 session. Subsequent assessments by the Medical Council of India (MCI) revealed significant deficiencies in faculty (16.79%) and residents (21.73%), as well as shortcomings in mi

MANOHAR LAL SHARMAversusM.C.I. AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 60912 September 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the Medical Council of India's (MCI) order rejecting the renewal of permission for the third batch of 150 MBBS students at Chintpurni Medical College for the 2013‑14 academic year. The college had previously been granted permission, but a routine inspection followed by a surpr

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusRAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND ORS.

2004 INSC 24912 April 2004Disposed off

The Medical Council of India (MCI) challenged interim orders issued by the Karnataka High Court that directed the Central Government to include seats of Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences' medical college in the seat matrix despite the college not having its Section 10‑A permission renewed for the 2002‑03 acade

THIRUMURUGA KIRUPANANDA VARIYAR THA VATHIRU SUNDARA SWAMIGAL MEDICAL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUSTversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 22212 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Trust sought to establish a medical college in Salem and required affiliation from Dr. M.G.R. Medical University. The University and the State Government conditioned affiliation on prior State permission, which the Trust could not obtain. The Central Government, under Section 10‑A of the Indian Medical Council Act

MRIDUL DHAR (MINOR) AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2005 INSC 2812 January 2005

The petitioners, two minor students, feared loss of seats in the 15% All India Quota (AIQ) for MBBS/BDS courses because several states failed to adhere to the prescribed admission time‑schedule, causing vacancies to revert to state quotas. The Supreme Court examined whether the AIQ must be calculated including Section

STATE OF PUNJABversusDAYANAND MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL AND ORS.

2001 INSC 50211 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab issued a notification reserving 60% of postgraduate medical seats for in‑service candidates and 40% for general candidates, and lowered the minimum qualifying mark in the entrance test from the 50% prescribed by Regulation 9 of the Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 to 40%. The Punjab

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusMADHU SINGH AND ORS.

2002 INSC 37611 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State Board conducted a combined entrance exam for MBBS and BDS seats for the 1997‑98 session. Respondent No. I, not selected for MBBS, opted for BDS and was admitted. After some MBBS seats became vacant, petitioners sought mid‑stream admission to those seats; the Patna High Court directed the Controller of Examina

DR. GANGA PRASAD VERMA ETC.versusSTTE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC.

1994 INSC 51210 November 1994Dismissed

Dr. Ganga Prasad Verma, an Assistant Professor, was promoted to Associate Professor in Neuro‑Surgery, a promotion challenged on the ground that he lacked the M.Ch. qualification required for the post. The High Court set aside the promotion and ordered a fresh consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dr

POONAM VERMAversusASHWIN PATEL & ORS.

1996 INSC 66910 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Poonam Verma, sued Dr. Ashwin Patel (a registered homoeopathic practitioner) and Dr. Rajeev Warty for negligence after her husband died following treatment with allopathic medicines prescribed by Dr. Patel, who was not qualified to practice allopathy. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission d

DR. TANVI BEHLversusSHREY GOEL & ORS.

2019 INSC 13429 December 2019Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Punjab and Haryana High Court order that struck down a domicile/residence‑based reservation provision in the prospectus of Government Medical College, Chandigarh for PG medical courses. The petitioners sought to uphold the reservation for candidates with a ‘Chandigarh back

AARTI GUPTA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1987 INSC 3669 December 1987Dismissed

The Punjab Government, invoking a need to fill 100 seats reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in MBBS/BDS courses, lowered the minimum qualifying marks for these categories from the 40% prescribed by the Indian Medical Council (MCI) Regulation II to 35% and later to 25% for the 1987 session. Only 32 eligi

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusLORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS.

2018 INSC 9439 October 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The Medical Council of India (MCI) and the Union of India debarred Lord Buddha Educational Society’s medical college for the 2018‑19 academic year after inspections revealed gross deficiencies in faculty, resident numbers and bed occupancy, invoking Regulation 8(3)(1)(a) of the 1999 Medical College Regulations. The col

DR. AJAY PRADHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS

1988 INSC 2129 August 1988Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered two appeals by Dr. Ajay Pradhan and Dr. Sanjay Kumar Shrivastava who sought admission to postgraduate medical seats that became vacant towards the end of the 1986-87 academic year. Both relied on Rule 10 of the Madhya Pradesh Selection for Post‑Graduation Courses Rules, 1984, which states t

UNION OF INDIAversusMOOLCHAND KHAIRATI RAM TRUST

2018 INSC 5939 July 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Government of NCT of Delhi could impose a condition requiring private charitable hospitals that received land at concessional rates to provide free treatment to economically weaker sections. The Court held that such a condition is a valid exercise of executive power under Article

NISHI MAGHU ETC. ETCversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.

1980 INSC 1229 May 1980Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined the selection process for admission to the Government Medical College, Jammu for 1979‑80, where the State had reserved seats for various categories including "rectification of regional imbalance", areas adjoining the line of control, bad pockets, social castes, wards of medical staff and stud

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANOTHER, ETC.versusDR. R. MURALI BABU RAO & ANR., ETC.

1988 INSC 709 March 1988Dismissed

The Andhra Pradesh Government prepared a panel under Rule 8 of the 1982 Medical & Health Service Special Rules to fill four Professor of Cardiology vacancies, counting only teaching experience after a DM qualification and excluding Assistant Professors who held an MD/MRCP with two years of Cardiology training. Dr R Mur

DR. MUKHTIAR CHAND AND ORS. ETC.versusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1998 INSC 3858 October 1998Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether Rule 2(ee)(iii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, which defines "registered medical practitioner", exceeded the legislative competence of the Central Government under the Indian Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and whether state notifications declaring Vaids/Hakims as practitioner

REDDY SAMPATH KUMARversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2005 INSC 4128 September 2005Dismissed

The appellant, a medical practitioner, administered the poison Pavulon to his parents‑in‑law and their three minor children, falsely claiming they were suffering from AIDS, with the intention of acquiring his father‑in‑law's property. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence

KRISHNA PRIYA GANGULY ETC.versusUNIVERSITY OF LUCKNOW & ORS. ETC.

1983 INSC 1457 October 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a series of petitions challenging the denial of admission to postgraduate medical courses in Uttar Pradesh. The State Government had issued an order under s.28(5) of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 prescribing that merit for admission be determined solely by the percentage of marks obta

AJAY KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1994 INSC 1067 March 1994Dismissed

The State of Bihar issued a prospectus for the 1992 Post‑Graduate Medical Admission Test reserving 50% of seats for socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and women. The appellants challenged this reservation before the Patna High Court, which dismissed their writ petitions, lea

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusINDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND ORS.

2001 INSC 5976 December 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra decided to establish a government medical college at Kolhapur, which was challenged by the Indian Medical Association on the ground that the State had not filed an application with the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences under Section 64 of the Act and that the decision contravened the un

ROHILKHAND MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL, BAREILLYversusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2013 INSC 5956 September 2013Dismissed

Rohilkhand Medical College, established in 2005, sought renewal of its MBBS intake for the 2008‑09 batch, but the Medical Council of India (MCI) repeatedly recommended non‑renewal due to deficiencies. Despite this, the Central Government granted permission after a central inspection team, which was later found by the C

SREE BALAJI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2015 INSC 5516 August 2015Case Allowed

Sree Balaji Medical College & Hospital sought to increase its MBBS admission capacity from 150 to 250 seats. The College had already been recognised under Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and had permission for 100‑150 seats. After an inspection report confirmed that the College satisfied all requirem

IQ CITY FOUNDATION & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 1016 February 2018Disposed off

IQ City Foundation, a medical college, applied for renewal of its permission under Section 10‑A of the Medical Council Act, 1956 to admit 150 MBBS students for the 2017‑18 academic year. The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspection and the subsequent Hearing Committee found a faculty deficiency of 15.9% and a resident

WORLD COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & RESEARCH AND HOSPITAL & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2017 INSC 8515 September 2017Hearing Adjourned

The World College of Medical Sciences & Research and Hospital sought a writ of mandamus to quash the order that barred it from admitting MBBS students for the 2017‑18 and 2018‑19 sessions and to obtain renewal of its Letter of Permission (LOP). The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspection in October 2016 identified si

UNION OF INDIAversusERA EDUCATIONAL TRUST AND ANR. ETC.

2000 INSC 1885 April 2000Appeal(s) allowed

Respondent Era Educational Trust applied to the Central Government for consent to establish a medical college, which was rejected after two inspections by the Medical Council of India. The Trust filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the Allahabad High Court, without allowing a counter‑affidav

DR. B. L. ASAWAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

1982 INSC 325 March 1982Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a medical graduate with an MBBS from Rajasthan University and an MD in Forensic Medicine from the University of Bihar, applied for a lecturer position in Forensic Medicine under the Rajasthan Medical Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission rejected his application, stat

YATINKUMAR JASUBHAI PATEL AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 11234 October 2019Dismissed

The petitioners challenged Gujarat University rules that gave preference to its own graduates for postgraduate medical seats, arguing that the NEET (PG) scheme and Section 10D of the Medical Council Act, 1956 require admissions to be based solely on NEET merit, rendering the institutional preference ultra vires. The Su

UNNI KRISHNAN, J.P. AND ORS. ETC. IRRCversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1993 INSC 404 February 1993Disposed off

The Supreme Court held that the right to education is a fundamental right flowing from Article 21, but it is limited to free education up to the age of fourteen and thereafter subject to the State’s economic capacity. The Court rejected the notion of a fundamental right to establish or obtain recognition for educationa

SATYAPRATA SAHOO & ORS.versusSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS.

2012 INSC 3183 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who qualified for postgraduate medical courses in Odisha as direct (open) candidates, challenged Clause 11.2 of the prospectus and the third proviso to Clause 9(2)(d) of the MCI regulations that gave additional weightage to in‑service candidates applying through the open category. They argued that the w

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusMEDICITI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (MIMS) & ORS.

2015 INSC 8791 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Mediciti Institute of Medical Sciences (MIMS) applied to the Medical Council of India (MCI) for renewal of permission to increase its MBBS intake from 100 to 150 seats for the 2015‑16 academic year. MCI inspections in December 2014 and May 2015 identified serious deficiencies in faculty, resident numbers, infrastru

KRISHNA MOHAN MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 8451 September 2017Hearing Adjourned

Krishna‑Mohan Medical College & Hospital challenged a Union of India order that barred it from admitting MBBS students for 2017‑18 and 2018‑19 and authorised the Medical Council of India to encash a Rs 2‑crore bank guarantee, on the ground of alleged faculty and resident‑doctor deficiencies and non‑cooperation with a s

SARASWATI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2017 INSC 8411 September 2017Case Allowed

The Saraswati Educational Charitable Trust sought to establish a medical college and was granted conditional permission for the 2016-17 session. The Medical Council of India (MCI) conducted an inspection in November 2016, finding only minor deficiencies (faculty 1.5% and residents 6.52%) within permissible limits. A se

IQ CITY FOUNDATION & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2017 INSC 6931 August 2017Dismissed

IQ City Medical College applied for renewal of its MBBS intake for the 2017‑18 academic year. The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspection identified deficiencies and recommended non‑renewal. A Hearing Committee found the deficiencies insufficient to deny renewal, but the Central Government sent the matter back to MCI

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusVEDANTAA INSTITUTE OF ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2018 INSC 5521 June 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspected Vedantaa Institute of Academic Excellence for its first renewal of permission to admit a second batch of MBBS students and found extensive deficiencies in faculty, resident strength, bed occupancy and infrastructure. The Bombay High Court directed MCI to conduct a fresh insp

MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCESversusPARYANI MUKESH JAWAHARLAL & ORS.

2007 INSC 6771 June 2007Disposed off

The Maharashtra University of Health Sciences prescribed, through its 2002 Ordinance, that internal assessment marks (20% of total) are to be used only for eligibility and aggregate calculation, while theory (including orals) and practicals are to be passed on the basis of external examination marks alone. A group of M

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search