Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 2401–2600
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nishar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 333, 351(3), 74, 75(2) of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a delay of more than a month in …
The applicant, Raj Bahadur, a laborer, was arrested on 4 August 2026 in connection with a case (Crime No.215 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Trademark Act, 1999 and the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He pleaded innocence, claiming false …
Sunil Kumar, a laborer, was arrested on 4 August 2026 and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Trademark Act, 1999 and the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He applied for bail, claiming he is innocent, has no criminal record and was falsely implicated. The State opposed the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, who was arrested in Crime No. 176 of 2026 under Sections 333, 309(6) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and lack of independent evidence, and pointed out that he had no prior …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard a bail application filed by Vikas, the accused in Crime No. 177 of 2026, which involved offences under Sections 109(1), 317(5), 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code and several provisions of the Arms Act. The applicant was represented by counsel Rajesh …
Viresh Rathor applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.91 of 2024) involving charges under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. This was his second bail application after the first was rejected on 27.08.2025. The trial court had already recorded …
The applicant, Arpit Roshan, filed a second bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31703 of 2026, seeking release in a case (Crime No.250 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 238(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 04‑07‑2025 and the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 164/2024, which alleged offences under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The complaint was lodged …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 20‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 10‑03‑2026, and the entire proceedings of case No. 1145 of 2026 arising from FIR under IPC sections 333, 110, 115(2), …
The applicant, identified as the son of the deceased, was charged with assaulting his father with an iron rod on 17 May 2026, resulting in death. The FIR was lodged on 18 May 2026, about a day after the inquest and post‑mortem examinations, during which the informant acted as a panch witness. The …
The applicant, Raj Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 08‑06‑2022 issued in Criminal Case No. 1786 of 2016 (Ram Singh v. Ajay Pal) under IPC sections 323 and 504. Instead of pressing the merit of the quash petition, the …
Ajay Kumar Gautam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2020 that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406 and 504 IPC. While the original prayer was to set aside the FIR, the petitioner later limited relief to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC and …
The applicants, Nikhil Jain and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6772 of 2023) that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants …
The petitioner, Smt Kirti Pandey, a complainant-wife whose husband had died, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 9, Kanpur Nagar, to expedite the trial of case No. 7630 of 2019 under IPC section 406 and to decide the respondents' discharge …
Smt Sangeeta Rani Chaudhary filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 10‑03‑2008 and related orders dated 24‑11‑2011 and 21‑12‑2011 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicant limited her prayer …
Ankit Kanaujiya was charged in Crime No.69 of 2026 under Sections 191(2), 103(1) and 190 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Sunil Kanaujiya, had already been released on bail in a related matter (Criminal Misc. Bail …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered bail application No. 32010 of 2026 filed by Rajendra Verma, who is in custody for offences under IPC sections 303(2), 324(2) and 317(2) arising from a theft case at Noida. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming he was falsely implicated and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajendra Verma, who is accused in Criminal Case No. 115 of 2026 under IPC Sections 303(2), 324(4) and 317(2). The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that no incriminating material was recovered from him. …
Abhishek Verma applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.124 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. The applicant argued that he had no prior criminal record and that a co‑accused, Hitesh Nigam Vayask, had already been …
The applicant, Hashim, was arrested in Crime No. 222 of 2026 under IPC sections 305‑A, 331(4) and 317(2) BNS for an alleged theft. He pleaded that he is innocent, that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and that the recovery alleged by the police is false, emphasizing his clean record and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 370 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only …
The applicant, Golu Kumar (also known as Shivshankar Kumar), applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.30 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 316(5) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Prize and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act and Section 66‑D of the …
Pinku Kumar was arrested in connection with Crime No.30 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 316(5) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Prize and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act. He applied for bail during …
The applicant Rahul was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 345 of 2025) involving the deaths of two individuals, Raja and Subham. The prosecution’s case is based solely on a vague allegation that Rahul might have been involved, with no statements from the deceased, no direct evidence, and …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Tetarbe filed a writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 16‑09‑2018 that alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and 120‑B. The relief was later limited to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC. The Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a cognizable …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Anurak, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 237 of 2026 under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of the CrPC and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming he was falsely implicated in a …
The applicant, Mohd Nawab, was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (318(4), 338, 336(3), 341(2), 317(2)), the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act in Crime No. 230 of 2026. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The …
Deepak Sharma applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case involving multiple IPC offences and a provision of the IT Act. The court noted that an accused’s prior criminal record cannot, by itself, justify continued detention if bail criteria are otherwise satisfied. The applicant’s criminal history was …
The High Court considered the bail application of Aditya Anand, who was arrested on 19 April 2026 in connection with a case involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant argued that co‑accused Pawan and Chhotu, who faced identical charges, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Aditya Anand, who was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of trial, arguing lack …
The High Court considered the bail application of Aditya Anand, who was arrested in Crime No.158 of 2026 on numerous charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He had been in custody since 19 April 2026. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Jay Prakash, who faced …
The High Court considered the bail application of Hitlar, who is implicated in Crime No. 148 of 2026 under several IPC sections (191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 131, 126(2), 352, 61(2)). The applicant claims he is innocent, was not named in the FIR, and was only mentioned in a co‑accused's confessional …
The applicant, Sohanvir @ Pintu, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.100 of 2026) under Section 109(1) of the IPC (Bailable Non-Compounded) and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and was actually injured in police cross‑fire, not responsible for any …
The applicant, Mohit, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 445 of 2018, which involved offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 1142 of 2025) pending against him, alleging that no offence was disclosed and that the prosecution was malicious. The court examined whether, at the stage of a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the cognizance order and all proceedings in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the second opposite party. The State opposed …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. filed by Ramesh Prajapati seeking to quash a summoning order dated 04‑04‑2023 and a bailable warrant issued by the Additional Civil Judge, Mirzapur in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 420 and 406 of …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 1143 of 2025) pending against him in the Kanpur Sessions Court. He alleged that no offence was disclosed against him and that the prosecution was instituted with …
Gopal Tiwari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash two orders that rejected his request to release two mobile phones seized in a criminal case (Criminal Case No. 3803 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 189, 170, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC and Section 66 …
Chhotu Kumar was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the U.P. Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, and applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the applicant's clean criminal record, and noted that a co‑accused, …
The applicant, Shahnwaz, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 725 of 2026) involving alleged cyber fraud under Sections 318(4), 61, 317(2) of the IPC and Section 66(D) of the Income Tax Act. The prosecution alleged that Rs. 49,000 was transferred to the applicant's account. The applicant …
Divyansh Pandey applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.180 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 238, 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's name appeared in a co‑accused’s confessional statement, but the court held that such a statement has no …
Shivam Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 362 of 2026) under Sections 318(2) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3) and 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act, 2024. The applicant had no prior criminal record. The learned counsel argued that a …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Smt Priti Srivastava (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31851 of 2026) in connection with a pending trial (Crime No. 20 of 2026) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant asserted that she is innocent, falsely …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was …
The applicant, Amit, was charged in Crime No.207 of 2026 under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court examined the facts, the submissions of …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. filed by Amar Singh and two others seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17‑06‑2026 issued by a Judicial Magistrate in Farrukhabad. The applicants alleged that they were falsely implicated and that the magistrate …
Shivam Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 166 of 2026) under IPC sections 103(1) and 238 BNS. He argued that the FIR was lodged fifty days after the alleged offence, there was no identification parade under Section 7 of the Evidence Act, and eyewitness statements were recorded …
Arun applied for bail in a case (Crime No.53 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Section 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and was actually a victim of police cross‑fire, sustaining a gunshot injury himself. The State …
The applicant, Arun, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 52 of 2026) alleging his involvement in the alleged snatching of jewellery from an informant's mother, with charges under Sections 309(4), 317(2) and 317(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 04‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 19‑09‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 490 of 2024, which arose from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 354 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …
The applicant Komal filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, on the ground that a compromise had been …
Abu Bakar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 66 of 2026) where he was charged under IPC sections 109(1), 352, 351(2) and sections 9 and 25 of the Arms Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Abu Ovaida, had already been released on bail in a similar case by a coordinate bench, and that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise …
Ritik Kumar Chohan applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 415 of 2026, charged under several IPC sections (318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 317(2) BNS) and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act, relating to transactions of Rs.13,000. The court noted that no FIR had been lodged against the applicant …
The applicant Mohit Tiwari filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31830 of 2026) seeking release pending trial in Crime No. 194 of 2026, which involves offences under IPC sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). He asserted that he is innocent, was not named in the …
The applicant, Gulshan Chandra, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 05 of 2026) under Section 109(1) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed a day after the incident and that the injuries to the victim were simple. The …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Subedar Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant, a 70‑year‑old illiterate man, claimed he was falsely implicated, had no involvement in the alleged …
Manvendra Singh, the driver of a D.C.M. vehicle from which urea was seized, was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Trade Marks Act and the Essential Commodities Act. He pleaded that he had no knowledge of the contraband and had no prior criminal record. The High Court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash Kumar in Criminal Case No. 313 of 2026, which alleged his involvement in extortion and impersonation of a police inspector under IPC sections 115, 127, 308 and 351. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and lack of any …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.240 of 2017, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act. The parties had reached a full settlement, which was verified by the …
The applicants, Ramod Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 26085 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. Instead of contesting the merits, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings after the parties settled their dispute amicably and the compromise was verified by the trial court. The trial court confirmed the settlement on 25 June 2025. Both the State and the second opposite …
The appellants were summoned under several IPC offences and Sections 3(1)(Da) and 3(1)(Dha) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act based on a complaint alleging forced removal of a combine, loss of crop, and assault with caste‑based insults. The appellants …
The appellant Jyoti Devi challenged the charge-sheet and the summoning order issued by the Additional Session Judge in a case under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the medical injury report was prepared 16 days after the incident, rendering the …
Shiv Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 321 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 105, 115(2), 352, 85 and 351(2). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, stating his wife fell from a terrace due to a slip, and that he had no prior criminal record and had …
Ritik was arrested in connection with a stabbing that led to the death of Mukesh after a month, and is charged under several IPC sections (103, 351(2), 61(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3) BNS) and the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, has no prior criminal record, and has been in custody …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that they had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 19‑05‑2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The High …
The applicant, Aditya Anil Mulam, sought bail in a POCSO special case alleging penetrative sexual assault on a five‑year‑old boy, with charges under Section 377 IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that there was a three‑day delay in filing the FIR and a ten‑day …
Suresh Shamrao Shinde, convicted under sections 120(B), 385 and 34 of the IPC, appealed his conviction while the CBI appealed his acquittal in a Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime (MCOC) case. At the time of his 2015 arrest, several gold ornaments were seized and a panchanama was prepared. The …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amit Suresh Shinde under CrPC Sec. 438 and B.N.S. Sec. 482 in connection with charges of causing a miscarriage and related offences. The prosecution alleged that Shinde instructed a doctor to induce a miscarriage without his wife's …
The applicant, convicted of murder under Sections 302 read with 34 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail. The prosecution’s case relied on a FIR that did not name the applicant, unexamined informant statements, and …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandip Sambhaji Borade, who has been in custody for over seven years for alleged kidnapping, rape (IPC §§363, 376(1)) and a POCSO offence (Section 4). The prosecution alleged that the 17‑year‑old niece was taken to a lodge and assaulted, …
The sole accused, Devanand Dattaram More, was arrested on 11 July 2023 for alleged offences under Sections 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, accused of stabbing the victim over a dispute concerning unpaid dues of Rs 5,000 for painting work. He has been in custody for more than three years …
The applicant, Sanjay Nivrutti Chakale, was convicted under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment with a fine. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of his sentence and bail pending the appeal. The trial court had already granted bail …
The applicant, convicted under the POCSO Act and IPC for repeated sexual assault of a minor, sought suspension of his life sentence and bail pending appeal. He argued that the FIR was filed late, suggesting false implication and rendering medical evidence irrelevant. The State and the victim opposed …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Suresh Bajirav Jagtap, accused No.2 in a case involving alleged sexual offences under IPC Section 376(2)(N) and POCSO Act Sections 4(M), 5(N) and 6. The original FIR and the prosecutrix’s first …
The appellant Ramapati appealed against his conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution’s case rested on a single eye‑witness who, during cross‑examination, admitted he was not present at the start of the incident and …
The appeal concerned the conviction of seven accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 304 and 149 for the fatal assault of Bankey Lal during a land‑dispute. The prosecution proved that the accused, armed with lathis and a sickle, assaulted the deceased, causing multiple injuries corroborated by medical …
The appellant Rakesh Chandra was convicted by the Sessions Court for attempting murder under Section 307 IPC after allegedly shooting the victim Harnath during a theft of a pea crop. The prosecution relied on the complainant’s written report, eyewitness testimony of the injured and the complainant, …
The case arose from a 1980 land dispute in Deoria district where the accused, armed with lathis and a pistol, assaulted the complainant and his companions, resulting in injuries and the recovery of a firearm. The trial court convicted all ten accused on various offences under the IPC and the Arms …
The revisionists filed a criminal revision against the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting their discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 302/34, 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The petitioners did not wish to contest the merits and instead requested liberty to …
The petitioner, a Lekhpal appointed in 1985, was transferred to a new posting on 30‑09‑1997. Shortly thereafter, a preliminary inquiry alleged that forged entries had been made in revenue records prior to his joining, and he was suspended and later terminated on 26‑03‑1998. The petitioner contended …
Deepak Shukla, detained since 20 November 2023 in connection with a 2020 case under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC, filed a second bail application after an earlier denial. No charge had been framed and a request for a separate trial remained pending, prompting the counsel to invoke …
The appellants, Akhilesh Kumar and his wife, appealed against a charge-sheet and summoning order in a case under the SC/ST Act and several IPC provisions. They argued that they were falsely implicated in a matrimonial dispute and that the FIR, victim's statement, and investigation report contain no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash charge sheet No. 29/2025 and related proceedings in a dowry‑related case. They claimed that the dispute with the second opposite party had been amicably settled and that the latter wished to withdraw the …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Mohit Kumar Vasaney and four relatives seeking to quash a criminal complaint (No. 577 of 2017) filed by Neha Vashaney under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …
The revisionists challenged the Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting their discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 409, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. They argued that the magistrate failed to consider the entire material, that the FIR was frivolous, and that the essential …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandan Kumar Mishra, who was not named in the FIR but was implicated through a co-accused's confessional statement in a case under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2). The applicant argued innocence, lack of substantive evidence, and …
The applicant, Chhabi Lal Yadav, a contract District Consultant for the Swachh Bharat Mission, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Crime No. 539 of 2019) filed against him under IPC sections 419, 420 and 409. He alleged that the embezzlement charges …
The appellants, Nirmala Singh and her husband, appealed against a summoning order dated 01‑06‑2022 issued by a Special Judge under the SC/ST Act in a case arising from an alleged assault and caste‑based abuse of a school watchman, Phool Chand. The FIR alleged assault but the medical report showed no …
The applicants, a wife and her father‑in‑law, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (including a charge‑sheet and cognizance order) filed under Sections 392, 504 and 506 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute. They contended that …
The appellants Sukhram, Aushan Singh and Jeet Raj were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the death of Veerpal Singh. The High Court examined the prosecution’s case, which relied mainly on the testimony of two relatives of the deceased and lacked any forensic linkage …
The applicants, Fazal @ Bhola and Rizwan, were arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 1103 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 333, 109, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed they were falsely implicated, that the injuries to the alleged …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohammad Farhan, who had been in custody for about seven months for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that his right to liberty under Article 21 was being …
Satnam Singh @ Satta filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 17‑09‑2024 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Case No. 3529/2025) for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The High Court examined the material …
The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Dhananjay Mishra and others seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, charge sheet and cognizance in State vs Shashi Prakash and others. The court examined the material and concluded that the facts on …
The applicant, Vansh Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order, and proceedings in a criminal case arising from FIR allegations under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2) and 352. The applicant argued that the FIR was based on false …
The applicant, Meraj Bangali, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings pending before the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) III/Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar (Case No. 7681 of 2026) arising from charges under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 09.01.2026 and the cognizance order dated 20.02.2026 in Criminal Case No. 491 of 2026, which arose from offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 333 of the Indian Penal …
The appellants challenged the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑02‑2023 issued by the Special Judge under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(2)(va) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the FIR was lodged 42 days after the incident, the investigation was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Sessions Court judgment dated 11‑12‑2025 and a Chief Judicial Magistrate order dated 06‑05‑2025 relating to offences under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The High Court examined the material …
The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Peera Pradhan and another seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 18‑04‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 11‑07‑2024 in a criminal case under Sections 504 and 506 IPC. The court examined the material …
The applicant, Hasim Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 24‑07‑2022 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 3060 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The High Court examined …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑01‑2023 in Crime No. 578 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The High Court examined the material and observed that the dispute …
The applicant, Tanvir Khan, was detained since 1 January 2024 in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Crime No.31 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of …
The appellants filed an appeal under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking to quash a chargesheet and summoning order relating to offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 427 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act. Both parties had reached a verified compromise, with the …
Bhairav Prasad Pathak was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 286 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. He had been in custody since 23 July 2024, amounting to more than two years of pre‑trial detention. The applicant contended that he was …
The applicants, Devendra Kumar Solanki and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 592/2026) instituted by the State of U.P. arising out of Crime No. 123/2025 under Sections 76, 78, 115(2) and 352 of the IPC. …
The applicant, Devendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 709 of 2026) filed against him under IPC sections 324(4), 352 and 351(2). The High Court examined the record and observed that the material on file …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaya Prasad Vishwakarma in a case involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(4), 340(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the CrPC. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and only mentioned in a …
The appellant, Lata Dohare, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act challenging the Special Judge's order dated 19.01.2026 that rejected her complaint under Section 226 of the BNSS. The complaint alleged that the respondents forcibly entered her …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 7638/2025, which involved offences under Sections 323, 325 and 506 of the IPC arising from a personal dispute. The parties had entered into a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Himanshu Gupta, who was arrested in a case under IPC sections 318(4), 338 and 336 BNS relating to alleged fraudulent vehicle sale and money transfer. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the prosecution’s evidence was contradictory, …
The applicant, Ajay Suresh Bhai Patel, was detained since September 14, 2024 in connection with a case (Crime No.256 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for bail, contending that he had been in custody for about …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet and entire proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 420 and 409 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a full compromise. Both parties, including the …
The appellants, Virendra and ten others, appealed against the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated October 2019 in a case involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 323/149, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)Dha. They claimed that the …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 4567 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 308, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement outside court, and the compromise …
The appellant Raju Kuraishi was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 120B, 504 and 506 and under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly cheating a victim in a property sale. The appellant contended that the FIR stemmed from a civil dispute, that the delay in filing the …
The applicants, a group of farmers, were implicated in an alleged assault at a sugar mill based on a FIR lodged a day after the incident, despite no injuries, no victim complaint, and no direct evidence linking them to the alleged offences. They filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS …
Petitioners Jyoti and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The respondents' standing counsel submitted that a criminal FIR had already been lodged under Sections 87, 115(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code at B.N.S. Police Station, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ishwar, who was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 82 of 2025) under Sections 316(5) and 61(2). Ishwar claimed innocence and argued that co‑accused had already been released on bail, invoking parity. The State opposed the …
The petitioners, Sakuntla Devi and another, who are already married, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to safeguard their life and liberty, alleging threats and harassment from family members due to their live‑in relationship. They submitted Aadhaar proof of majority and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 12‑09‑2025. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …
The petitioners, who are in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty against threats from private respondents. The petitioners alleged that the private respondents might eliminate them for family honour. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vipin Kumar Gangwar in a criminal case involving alleged rape, blackmail, and the sending of obscene messages under sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused, a former neighbour, drugged the …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty from alleged threats by private respondents. The petitioners claimed they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 20‑12‑2022 and the entire proceedings in case No. 260139 of 2022 (Manoj v. Ksristy & another), which arose from a complaint under Section 379 IPC. The complaint had named …
The petitioners, Bilal Ahmad and five others, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑05‑2025 that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had earlier settled their marital dispute through a …
Sayyad Mohammad Avid was arrested in connection with alleged forgery of documents to obtain two passports and was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12(1) of the Passports Act. Two FIRs were lodged for the same incident, leading the applicant to claim double …
Kripal Singh filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 5928 of 2021, alleging false implication and lack of evidence. The State opposed, contending that the issues were factual and that at the stage of taking cognizance only a prima facie case is required. The …
Ramawati Devi, the mother of a co-accused, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 3(5), 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. She argued that she was falsely implicated, that the FIR contained only general allegations against her, and that a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑12‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 05‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 15665 of 2025 (State vs. Sanjay Sharma and others). The court …
Mohd Aslam Khan filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 31‑10‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 09‑01‑2026 in a case registered as Crime No.239 of 2025 under Sections 354A, 354C and 509 of the IPC. The opposite party questioned …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Kumar, who was charged under several IPC provisions and the POCSO Act for allegedly fathering a child with a mentally retarded victim. The prosecution’s case relied on the victim’s identification, but the victim could not clearly …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite the disposal of a criminal case (State vs. Ram Bachan, case No. 5085 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur, under Sections 323 …
Faizan was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving alleged transfer of Rs.9 lakhs and charged under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. He had been in custody since 10 April 2025, amounting to more than one …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quashing of two criminal cases (ST No.22 of 2023 and ST No.114 of 2022) arising from Crime No.64 of 2022, which involved several non‑compoundable offences under the IPC. Both the applicants and the State admitted that they had …
The applicant, Kishan Vishwakarma, was arrested in connection with a violent incident that resulted in the death of a relative of the first informant. The FIR alleged that the applicant and his family assaulted the informant's elder brother and that the applicant caused a head injury to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Yadav, who was arrested in a case involving alleged fraud causing a loss of Rs. four crores and charged under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted no specific allegations against him, and highlighted that …
Shankar Singh Lodhi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 224 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 308(5), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, where the prosecution alleged he snatched Rs.10,000 and threatened to extort Rs.10 lakh. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty against threats from private respondents. The State contended that petitioner No.1 is still married to another person, making the live-in relationship …
The applicant, Yashraj Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04‑12‑2025, the cognizance order dated 12‑02‑2026 and the entire proceedings of State v Yashraj Verma (Case No. 8859 of 2026). The applicant alleged that the …
The applicant, an accused in a criminal case (Session Case No. 31201/2020 under Section 380 IPC), filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to dispose of the case within a stipulated time. The State’s counsel raised no objection provided the …
Samrat applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.40 of 2026) alleging he fired pellets causing injuries to three persons. The prosecution alleged he was the primary accused under IPC sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 3(5) BNS and Arms Act sections 3, 25, 27, while the defence argued his …
The Allahabad High Court considered the bail application of Yogesh Kumar, who was charged in Criminal Case No. 100 of 2026 under IPC sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 64(1). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, being the brother of co‑accused Pramod Kumar, and that the FIR was …
The applicant, Babloo Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 188 of 2025) against Laxman and others, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of the IPC. …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Khushbu, who is accused in Criminal Case No. 87 of 2026 under IPC sections 137(2), 3(5), 142 and 143(4) for alleged child abduction. Counsel for the applicant contended that she is innocent, that there is no direct evidence against her, …
The revisionists, Prashant Kumar and Deepu, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, which rejected their discharge application in a case under IPC sections 323, 504 and 354. They contended that the allegations were false, the investigation …
Manoranjan Kumar applied under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of an order that denied the release of his passport and permission to travel abroad. The applicant had deposited his passport with the police after obtaining anticipatory bail, but the trial court rejected his request for travel …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 18.05.2026 (Case Crime No.189 of 2026) and a direction restraining the third respondent from arresting him. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 3(5) and 194(2) of the Indian Penal Code. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhagwan Singh @ Bhoora Pradhan in a case under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the IPC relating to alleged GST document fraud. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only on hearsay, …
The applicants, Omveer and Kishanpal alias Kushanpal, were implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 130 of 2026) involving serious IPC offences including murder and attempt to murder. The first applicant, Omveer, had died, and the second applicant was in custody since May 27, 2026, with a criminal …
The High Court considered a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 23922 of 2026) filed by Omveer and Kishanpal alias Kushanpal, who were accused in a case under IPC sections 310(2), 317(3) and 61(2). The applicants claimed innocence, argued that the FIR named unknown persons and that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 04.05.2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1698 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. They argued that they had not been arrested and that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by a Judicial Magistrate in Mathura in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicant contended that he …
The applicants, Sayed Ahmad and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 08.01.2025 and the entire proceedings in a complaint case under Section 365 IPC. They later refrained from pressing the substantive relief and instead requested …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 97432 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, where they were charged under several IPC provisions and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 26‑10‑2018 in Criminal Case No. 5057 of 2018, which was instituted under Section 323 of the IPC. They contended that the magistrate had taken …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1498 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2) and 352 IPC. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a Session Trial relating to a 2013 murder case under Section 307 IPC. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the NBW was issued and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 28‑06‑2024 in a criminal complaint (Case No. 143827 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 511 of the IPC. The parties were engaged in a financial …
Ajai Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, speedy, and proper investigation of an FIR dated 05.05.2024 under IPC sections 420, 406 and IT Act section 66. The petitioner alleged that the police were not investigating …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Syorajveer Alias Surajveer, who is charged with rape under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated due to a village rivalry, that the victim’s medico‑legal report did not support a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiv Kumar and two others in a criminal case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 191(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated, had …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by 64‑year‑old retired employee Sudhadevi Srivastava, who feared arrest in a case alleging misappropriation of Rs. 29,93,943 along with 12 co‑accused. The alleged amount had been deposited and no actual loss was claimed; the receipt of …
The applicant, Mohd Yaseen, was arrested in connection with a police party‑firing case (Crime No. 220 of 2026) alleged under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no police personnel were injured, and that …
The petitioner, Rang Bahadur, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of FIR No. 245/2024 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, informed the …
The applicant Jawahar Lal filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summoning order in a case under Section 354 IPC. He alleged that the prosecution was malicious and intended to harass him. The High Court examined whether any of the Supreme …
Manvendra Singh was arrested in Crime No. 90 of 2026 for alleged rape of a minor and related offences under the POCSO Act, SC/ST Act and other statutes. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the medico‑legal report showed no injuries to the victim’s private parts, and that he …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 09-04-2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aas Mohammad in a rape case under Sections 64(2), 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 5N and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the victim’s statement under Section 183 did not incriminate him, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Kumar, who was arrested in connection with an alleged assault over a Rs.400 dispute during a marriage ceremony. The FIR alleged that the accused, along with others, used lathi, danda, kulhari and baluwa, causing grievous injuries to one …
The applicant, Rajesh Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings pending against him. The injury report showed no serious injury and the parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the trial court on 06.01.2025. Both …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and related criminal proceedings involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute …
The applicant, Kamlesh Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1130 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 323, 504 and 342 IPC. The applicant argued that two …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 304 and 308 IPC. The applicant alleged false implication and mala‑fide motives, contending …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 24‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑01‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 32 of 2026 (State of U.P. v. Khanjhati & others). The court examined …
Satya Prakash filed an application under Section 529 CrPC seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite Case No. 83 of 2016 (State vs. Daulat Ram) involving offences under Sections 420 and 120‑B IPC, which has been pending since 2016. The State, represented by the Attorney General, …
Manish Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 23 April 2026 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) that rejected his request for an extension of time to file a discharge application and simultaneously framed charges in a criminal case. The applicant …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑02‑2026 issued in State v. Shan et al., which arose from charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the …
Ranjeet Prasad filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS Act seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4 July 2024 in State vs. Ranjeet Prasad (Case No. 4650 of 2024), which charged him under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued, relying on the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 11‑Sept‑2025 and the cognizance order of 31‑Jan‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No. 474 of 2026) arising from FIR No. 0288 of 2025. They alleged that the FIR was false, filed to harass them in a …
The applicants, Mohammad Rehan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and a non‑bailable warrant issued in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 336 IPC and Section 7 of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑08‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑11‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 4729 of 2023 (State v. Sushil Kumar and others) …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite Sessions Trial No. 810 of 2008 (State vs. Jagga @ Jagdish) concerning offences under Sections 302 and 394 IPC. The applicant argued that the trial, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 19‑08‑2025, and the entire proceedings of case No. 72367 of 2025 relating to alleged offences under IPC sections 271, 278, …
The applicant Rabiya filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑05‑2026, and the entire proceedings in case 33831 of 2026 arising from an FIR under IPC sections 406, 504, 419 and 120B. The High Court examined …
The juvenile applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 01‑10‑2023, the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑01‑2024, and the entire proceedings pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Shamli, relating to offences under IPC sections 147, …
Shamim applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 after a charge sheet was filed. The A.G. argued that the alleged offences (IPC s.420, 406, 506) do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there is no risk of arrest. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Himanshu, accused in a case (Crime No. 498 of 2026) involving alleged assault on a traffic police constable. The FIR alleged that the accused, while riding a motorcycle, hurled abuses and assaulted the constable, causing a head …
Kamlesh Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the charge‑sheet dated 25‑09‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑01‑2026 in Case No. 264 of 2026 (State vs. Munni Devi). He relied on a prior application by co‑accused Ram Kumar (Application No. 24122 …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Rahul alias Pappu and five others seeking to quash the charge sheet, summons and non‑bailable warrant in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 354, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …
Rahul was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 69, 115(2), 351(3) and 352, alleged to have established a physical relationship with a married woman by falsely promising marriage, administered drugs, and caused a miscarriage. The victim’s statements under CrPC sections 180 and 183 …
Mangal Singh, a Home Guard, was arrested on a FIR alleging that he stole a service revolver, invoking Sections 305(e) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a bail application claiming innocence, false implication, and lack of independent evidence, and has been in custody since 17 June 2026. …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rani Devi, who was accused of misappropriating a family pension of Rs. 20,32,771 and facing charges under various IPC sections, CrPC Section 482, and IT Act Section 66(D). The applicant claimed she was falsely implicated, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple IPC offences including kidnapping, extortion and assault. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that no incriminating material was found on him, while the …
The applicant, Rajiv Kapoor, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 26‑05‑2026 in Criminal Case No.4526 of 2026. The ground relied upon was that the charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sudama Pandey in a 2019 case involving alleged misappropriation of food grains under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A, 120B and 34 of the IPC. Pandey contended that he was a fair‑price shop dealer, the FIR was lodged after a …
