Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17312 judgments · newest first · showing 2201–2400
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Smt Bala, a 76‑year‑old woman, who was alleged to be involved in offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The FIR was lodged thirty‑one years after the alleged incident and after a belated …
The applicant, Dharmi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 109, 117(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). He claimed that co‑accused Rohit Bhati and Jeetu @ Jitendra had already been granted anticipatory bail by another …
The applicant, Rihan, was arrested in Crime No.156 of 2025 under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act and has been in custody since 26 March 2025. He filed a second bail application after the first was rejected, but offered no new grounds for release other than the length of …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving multiple IPC offences and a provision of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, alleging false implication in an FIR concerning stone‑pelting and road‑jam. They argued that they were …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Rajni and Smt. Anu (Kamlesh) under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged assault under various IPC sections. The applicants, both women with no criminal record, claimed they were falsely implicated due to …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 15‑11‑2021 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that, per the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑10‑2008, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑11‑2008, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 7792 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324 and …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 325, 352, 351(2) and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular …
Om Prakash Tiwari, the accused in Criminal Case No. 8662 of 2026, was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order, contending that Sections 406 (criminal …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and the process under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC dated 05‑06‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 332, 353, 336 and 427 IPC. The …
The revisionists, Kalyan Singh and another, challenged the trial court's order rejecting their discharge application in a complaint case under Section 406 IPC. They argued that the evidence recorded under Section 202 CrPC contradicted that under Section 244 CrPC and that the complaint was filed …
Rahul Sharma was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 364 of 2026) alleging offences under IPC sections 109(1) and 351(3), the B.N.S. provision 3(5) and the Arms Act sections 3, 25 and 27. The applicant contended that the injury to the victim was limited to the right hand, not …
Jitendra Kumar Rathi filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑01‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 12‑08‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 22640 of 2026. He contended that the charge‑sheet improperly included both Sections 420 and 406 of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑12‑2022 in Criminal Case No.15790 of 2022, which was based on a charge‑sheet under IPC Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506. They contended that these offences …
The applicants, Smt. Shyamo Yadav and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑05‑2023 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑06‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 5314 of 2023. They contended that the charge‑sheet improperly alleged both …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.13521 of 2022) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which arose from Crime No.337 of 2020. They relied on a prior order dated …
The applicants, Ramu Tiwari and Amrita Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged execution of a forged sale deed. They claimed they were unaware of the forgery, having signed the deed under instructions from their mother and grandmother, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 11‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 638 of 2025 (State vs. Sanjeev Kumar) which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. They contended, relying on a recent Supreme …
The applicant, Mohammad Shafiq, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 15104 of 2026) arising from an alleged offence under Section 420 IPC. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under IPC sections 363, 372, 504, 506, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to file a regular bail …
The applicants Usman, Farhan (Monu) and Nauman sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving IPC offences of dacoity, hurt, assault, criminal intimidation, attempt to murder and conspiracy. Usman, who has two prior criminal cases, was denied anticipatory bail, with the court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑11‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑07‑2026 in State v. Waseem and others, relating to offences under Sections 447, 504, 506, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak @ Rohit, who was arrested in Crime No.151 of 2026 under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing a five‑month delay in lodging the FIR and a lack of corroborative evidence linking him to the alleged …
Ashwani Jadaun was arrested in connection with alleged forgery of a vehicle chassis and related offences under several IPC sections and the Income Tax Act. He claimed innocence, stating he had no authority to issue invoices and that the allegations were false. The State opposed bail, but the court …
The applicant, Gopal Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 16‑04‑2018 in Criminal Case No.6900970, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the …
Sunil Arora filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑08‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 10‑07‑2025 in State v. Sumti Arora, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s …
Mashkoor applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where he was charged with offences including rape, dowry prohibition violations, and various IPC offences. This was his second anticipatory bail application; the first had been dismissed after the charge sheet was filed. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 13‑11‑2025 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352, 351(3) of the IPC, Section 109 of the B.N.S and Section 30 of the …
The applicant, Rahul Dilawar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 308 IPC. He contended that he was falsely …
Harish Chaudhary filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 18‑06‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 7676 of 2026) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The charge sheet alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, …
The applicant, Farman, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 416 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 9 of the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025. The High Court considered the facts, the lack of …
The applicants, Keshav and 13 others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 187 of 2026) arising from charges under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 121(1), 132, 125, 115(2), 352 and 3(v) of the BNS. The High Court …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Omendra Singh in a case involving IPC offences 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant argued that he had no criminal antecedents, no coercive process had been initiated, and that the charge sheet had …
The applicant, Pintu Chauhan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑11‑2023 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended, …
The applicant, Pradeep, was arrested in connection with Crime No.293 of 2024, charged under IPC sections 302, 120‑B, 504, 506, 34 and Arms Act sections 3, 25 and 27. He has been in custody since 19 June 2024 and filed a second bail application after an earlier one was rejected. The counsel for the …
Neha Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and charge sheet in Criminal Case No. 99192 of 2024 (State vs. Lokesh et al.) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 7257 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 309 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had already reached an amicable …
The petitioner, Sudheendra Kumar Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Azamgarh to expedite the disposal of Complaint Case No. 291 of 2020, which involves offences under Sections 498A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 11732 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 352, 351(3) and 109(1) of the IPC arising from a dispute in …
The applicants, Mustakeem and Smt. Bhoori, who are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the alleged victim, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging that they administered a poisonous substance to the victim. The prosecution alleged offences under IPC …
The applicant, Yusuf, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Crime No.190 of 2016 (State of U.P. v. Yusuf) which involved charges under Sections 398 and 401 of the IPC, the charge‑sheet dated 25‑02‑2014 and a non‑bailable warrant. The High Court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramjeet Lodhi in a case involving alleged assault and death of a victim. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing out that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's claim that the assault caused the victim's …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohammad Imran, a stenographer accused under IPC sections 420 and 120‑B and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly certifying a document. The applicant claimed innocence, no criminal history, and argued that the …
The applicant, Bunty Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 05‑07‑2022 in Criminal Case No. 7944 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Priti in a criminal case under Section 108 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging abetment of suicide. The prosecution’s case rested on alleged illicit relations with a co‑accused and marital discord, while the post‑mortem report showed …
The applicant, Akbar Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 16‑01‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 932 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC arising from a 2021 incident. The applicant contended, relying on …
The applicant, Ambrish Srivastava, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 8 April 2021 and the entire proceedings of case No. 95215 of 2021, which involved charges under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal …
Ramdayal Rai was arrested in a case registered under Sections 498‑A, 377, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the FIR was false, filed after an application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC, and that there was no medical evidence to support the …
The applicant Pooja filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑05‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑06‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 8767 of 2025 (State of U.P. v. Gulfam). The ground relied upon was that the charge sheet alleged offences …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 filed by Kunj Bihari Sharan. The State opposed, highlighting an undisclosed prior case (Case Crime No. 327 of 2005) involving offences under Sections 147, 307, 323, 452 and 506 IPC. The court held that the applicant’s …
The applicant, Ompal Sharma, was named among twelve accused in a case involving assault causing non‑life‑threatening injuries to three victims. He had no prior criminal record and had earlier obtained interim protection from arrest in a writ petition, which was later dismissed. The applicant sought …
Kayamuddin alias Raju applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.149 of 2026) involving charges under Sections 109(1), 317(2), 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act (Section 3/25) and the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act (Section 3/8). The incident arose from a police firing in …
Himanshu Thakur applied for bail in a case (Crime No.172 of 2026) involving eleven FIRs under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. The court noted that a co‑accused, Manisha Chauhan, had already …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Smt. Sunita, who is accused of embezzlement under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and 120‑B. The first bail application had been dismissed, but the applicant argued that the trial had stalled for five months after framing of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29 March 2026 and the entire proceedings in State vs. Ramakant and others (Case No. 2066 of 2026). The charge sheet pertained to offences under Sections 329(3), 111(7), 352 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 22‑01‑2026. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the settlement. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 06‑02‑2026. The State, represented by the learned A.G.A., did not contest the settlement. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court. The trial court had confirmed the settlement on 30.01.2026, and the opposite party 2 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 19‑02‑2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 655 of 2025) on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 30 January 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute with the State and other respondents had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 19‑02‑2026. The High Court noted that the parties had indeed …
The High Court considered the bail application of Sahajram Ramdhar Chouhan, accused of murder under Section 302 IPC for a stabbing that occurred on 13 October 2021 in Bhiwandi. The prosecution’s case relied on circumstantial evidence, including blood‑stained clothing and a knife, while an …
Ganesh Bhausaheb Kale, accused No.10 in a case involving murder, conspiracy, extortion and organised crime offences, had been in custody for over five years and six months. He sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing that his prolonged detention violated his …
The applicant, a senior police officer, was charged with sexual assault of a fellow police officer (the first informant) under Sections 376, 354, 374(3) and 506 IPC. The Sessions Judge rejected the applicant’s discharge application and ordered trial to continue. The applicant filed a criminal …
The applicant, Vinayak Dnyaneshwar Marathe, was arrested in connection with a large‑scale investment fraud alleged under the MPID Act, the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act and several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The complainant claimed that Marathe, as a director and …
The petitioners sought to quash FIR No. I-159 of 2016 alleging an offence under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition was filed after the charge‑sheet had been filed, charges were framed and the trial had commenced. The petitioners were not present when the matter …
The applicant, Pravin Harkishan Malkani, filed a criminal application under Section 438 of the CrPC seeking relaxation of a condition that required him to attend the police station every two months, a condition imposed by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act in 2022. The FIR was lodged in 2018, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nitin Rajendra Kusekar, who was arrested for assault causing grievous hurt under Section 307 of the IPC. The incident arose from a verbal altercation at a paan shop, …
The applicant, Vaishali Anil Tikam, was convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate and the conviction was confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 294, 509 and 354-A of the Indian Penal Code, attracting short-term imprisonment and fines. While on bail during the trial, …
Nitin Aayalaji Wakte was arrested on 1 April 2022 for the murder of his wife and is charged under IPC sections 302, 307, 504 and 506. After more than four years and six months of pre‑trial detention, he filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The …
Akshay Balu Sathe, accused of murder under Section 302 IPC, had been in custody for over four years with only one witness examined. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, invoking his right to a speedy trial under Article 21. The Court examined …
The applicant, Arif Ajij Kureshi, has been in custody for more than three years and ten months for alleged murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, based largely on a single circumstantial witness. He sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, …
Faisal @ Dadi Shafi Shaikh, arrested on 14‑10‑2024, was charged under Sections 8(c), 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act for possession of 99.05 g of contraband, a commercial quantity. He has been in custody for 1 year 10 months while the trial has not commenced, whereas co‑accused No. 2 and No. 3 have …
The applicant, Gangaram Yasha Shid, was convicted by a First Class Judicial Magistrate in Raigad-Alibag for offences under IPC sections 354, 354-A(1) and 509, receiving one year of rigorous imprisonment, one year of simple imprisonment, and a compensation order under CrPC section 357(3). The …
The applicant, Jagdamba Prasad Badai Yadav, was charged under IPC sections 376, 376(3), 354, 452 and POCSO Act sections 4, 8, 12 for allegedly inserting a finger into the genitalia of a six‑year‑old girl. The charge‑sheet was filed in 2022 but the charge was not framed until 21 July 2025, leading to …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 21 October 2021 that had been issued in a criminal complaint under Sections 452, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that the dispute was purely civil, …
The appellant Rakesh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Agra, for raping an 18‑month‑old girl and for house‑trespass, under Sections 376 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to ten years imprisonment and a fine. The prosecution case relied on eyewitness testimony of the …
The applicant, Jamal Akhtar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 17‑April‑2010 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 10745 of 2010) arising from offences under Sections 324, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant alleged false implication, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No. 557 of 2025, which arose from a case of alleged offences under various IPC sections. The applicants argued that they were falsely implicated and that the proceedings constituted an abuse of process, …
Shailendra Kumar filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 23‑02‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club …
The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal order that directed the release of a retired railway servant's pension despite a pending criminal appeal against his conviction. The respondent, a former Helper in the North Eastern Railways, had been reinstated …
The applicant, Akhand Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of an FIR and charge sheet registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the FIR failed to …
The revisionists challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 29.11.2025, which had set aside their acquittal under Section 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act and convicted them on probation. They contended that an earlier appeal (Criminal Appeal No.49 of 2025, Fateh Singh v. …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC filed by Pintoo Sarju Gautam, accused of offences including murder, kidnapping, and sexual assault against a 16‑year‑old deaf boy. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a “last seen” theory, with no direct or circumstantial …
The appellant, Mohiuddin Siddiqui, appealed against the Special Judge’s order denying bail in NIA Special Case No.666 of 2022, which involved charges under the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). He had been in custody for over seven and a half …
The Bombay High Court considered a regular bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed by Renuka Nikhil Khanna, accused of murdering her husband under Section 302 IPC. The applicant had been in custody for over two years and suffered …
The petitioner, Satish Ramvilash Pandey, filed a writ petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of FIR No. 254 of 2019 relating to an alleged assault on 24 April 2019. The prosecution alleged that accused No.1 and No.2 assaulted the complainant, while the petitioner …
The Bombay High Court considered an application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for bail to Navnath Kakasaheb Nihal, accused of murder and related offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant had been in custody for over two years, with a period of …
The petitioner, Balendrasingh Shivmurtisingh Thakur, was convicted of several offences including murder under IPC s.396 and related sections, receiving two separate life sentences that were to run concurrently. He challenged the State's order classifying his case under Category 6(c) of the G.R. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Omkar Krushna Magar under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with CR No. 366 of 2025, which alleged his involvement in a crime by providing a mobile phone, SIM card and a vehicle to co‑accused after the …
The petitioner, a former Junior Clerk at a private school, was terminated following a departmental inquiry that found him guilty of forging service documents, illegal salary increments for his wife, and other misconduct. He appealed the termination under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of …
The Bombay High Court considered a regular bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed by Renuka Nikhil Khanna, accused of murdering her husband under Section 302 IPC. The applicant had been in custody for over two years and suffered …
The appellant, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine, has been incarcerated for over 11 years in an open prison and has no prior criminal record. He filed an interim application seeking bail and suspension of his sentence pending a criminal appeal …
Rahul Gandhi filed a writ petition challenging the issuance of process against him for alleged defamation under Section 500 IPC, based on a complaint by Mahesh H. Shrishrimal, a BJP member. The petitioner argued that the complainant lacked locus standi under Section 199 CrPC and that the BJP, being …
The applicant, Arundhati Jayadeep Tambvekar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420 and 406. The prosecution alleged that the applicant induced a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Chetan Yashwant Ingale, who had been in custody for three years and two months since his arrest on 06‑07‑2023. He is charged in C.R. No. 64 of 2023 with multiple serious offences …
The applicant, Vinod Tejbahadur Singh, was charged under IPC sections 302, 120(B) and 34 for a murder allegedly committed in conspiracy with 13 others. The prosecution argued that the murder was pre‑planned and the applicant had absconded, thus denying bail. The defence highlighted the applicant's …
Vishal Parekar was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, for attempting to murder (IPC 307) and for offences under the Arms Act, receiving life imprisonment along with concurrent sentences for the arms charges. He appealed, arguing that the injury inflicted was non‑fatal, that he had …
The appellants Masroor and Maqsud were convicted under Sections 308 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to three years of rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court observed that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Sections 360 and 361 of the Code of …
The appeal was filed by five accused who had been convicted under IPC sections 147, 308 read with 149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment, with the sentences to run concurrently. Over the years, four of the appellants died, and the fifth, Gulzar Singh, could not be located despite extensive …
The appellants Ram Kunwar and Ram Kewal were convicted for the murder of Smt. Shanichari and for concealing the offence based on the testimony of the victim's five‑year‑old daughter, Kumari Pramila, and the alleged recovery of a knife. On appeal, the High Court examined the reliability of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 62 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 452, 323 and 506 IPC. The parties had entered into a settlement on 28 July 2025, which was verified and reported to the …
The applicants Vijay Bahadur Singh and another filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 04‑08‑2024 and the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 9556 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 419, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicants did not …
The appellant Raju Yadav and six others were summoned under the SC/ST Act for alleged assault, attempted rape, and caste‑based abuse against a complainant and his minor daughters. The appellant challenged the summoning order, arguing that the complaint did not disclose the essential ingredients of …
The appellants Kalam and four others appealed against a summoning order dated 26‑02‑2021 in a complaint (Pappu v. Kalam) that alleged offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 427, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act. They contended that the matter stemmed from a land dispute, that no …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 30 September 2019 in case crime No. 533 of 2019, which alleged offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shyama Devi, who was arrested in FIR No. 368 of 2025 under several IPC sections for allegedly selling a victim. She claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged by the victim herself and that co‑accused Rashid had already been …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑10‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 17‑04‑2025, and the entire proceedings in case No. 5174 of 2025 (State v. Jaswant Singh et al.) arising from an alleged …
The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance and summoning order dated 11 July 2023 in Criminal Case No. 48767 (State v. Kundan & Others), which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that Sections …
The applicant, Anil Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 16 March 2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, which directed the transfer of a disputed amount from his account to that of the opposite party. The order arose from a criminal …
The applicants, Seema Devi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Sessions Trial No. 758/2021, which involved offences under IPC sections 427, 504, 506, 341 and the SC/ST Act. The parties had reached a full settlement, with the opposite party returning a …
The applicant, Hemant Goyal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a revision order dated 19‑06‑2024 and a summoning order dated 18‑07‑2025 in a criminal case involving IPC offences 323, 324, 325, 504 and 506. He did not press the merits of the quash relief and instead …
The applicant, Hussain Zaidi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, summons and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 265 of 2025) arising from a Section 420 IPC offence. The applicant alleged that the prosecution was instituted mala …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 6087 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant did not press the merits of the quash petition and instead requested the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 13‑11‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 01‑03‑2021 in Criminal Case No. 1585 of 2021 (Crime No. 487 of 2019) which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of …
The revisionists filed a criminal revision under Sections 438/442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a trial court order that summoned them in a complaint case for offences under Sections 323, 406 and 504 IPC. They argued that the summons violated Article 21(2) of the …
The revisionists Durga Yadav and others filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging the Sessions Judge's order rejecting their discharge application under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code and directing framing of charge …
The applicant, Sunil Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No. 68536 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 386, 420, 506 and 342 of the IPC. The application was filed before the High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 2 June 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, which directed the transfer of a disputed amount from the applicants' account to that of the second respondent. The order arose from …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Govind Yadav, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 98 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 296, 333, 352, 115(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel argued that he is innocent, has no prior …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07.08.2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State and the second …
The applicants, Mohit Arora and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑07‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 10188 of 2026) arising from alleged offences under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. The parties …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T.No. 1677 of 2022) relating to offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement and a compromise was verified by the trial court on …
The applicant, Raj Bahadur Bind, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the judgment and orders in a criminal revision and a criminal case involving allegations of domestic violence under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 16‑07‑2026 in Session Trial No. 1244 of 2026, which arose from Criminal Case No. 364 of 2018 (IPC §§ 420, 448). The applicant contended that he …
The applicant, Sanno, was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 357 of 2026) involving IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 352 and 333. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out a material contradiction between the FIR, which attributes the injury …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Surendra Kumar, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 183 of 2026) under Sections 308(5), 308(6) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the CrPC for alleged extortion. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and lack of cogent …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajveer Singh, a former Revenue Inspector, who was arrested in connection with a land‑lease fraud case (Criminal No. 156 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 19‑04‑2026 filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 72 of 2026, Meerut. They prayed that before any arrest the police be directed to follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the merits …
Petitioners Subash Prajapati and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 15-11-2025, registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, and a direction that they not be arrested. The State opposed the petition and informed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10806 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the material and held that, on the …
The applicants, Smt Savitri Devi and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 13‑07‑2022 and the charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2021 in Crime No. 591 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 352 and 324 of the Indian …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naveen, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 74, 351(2), 65(1) of the IPC and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. Naveen argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim's statements, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, who was arrested in a rape case (Criminal Case No. 193 of 2026) under Sections 87, 69 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the victim, a major married woman, had consented and that the medico‑legal …
The revisionists challenged the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting their discharge application under Section 308 of the IPC, arguing that the evidence did not show any intention to cause death and that the injuries were simple. The State contended that the assault caused serious injuries, …
The applicant, Asha Jyotsna, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Mainpuri, dispose of a pending criminal case (State vs Vimal Kumar) within a fixed time. The applicant argued that the trial was unduly delayed, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farhan in a criminal case (Crime No. 342 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17-11-2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 16-10-2025, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 14265 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 352 …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No.28499 of 2026 filed by Mohd Azam, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No.104 of 2026) under several IPC sections including 61(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 351(2). The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, …
The petitioners, Smt. Afsha and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere in their marital relationship and to provide them protection. The respondents contended that petitioner No. 2 was already married to another woman and had contracted a second …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that dismissed their discharge application in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323 and 326 of the IPC. The order being …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the disposal of State vs. Yogendra Nishad (S.T. No. 1261 of 2024), a case involving offences under IPC sections 376(3) and 328 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2). The State's Additional …
The applicant, Kuldeep Baghel, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 19243 of 2022) and the accompanying charge sheet and cognizance order relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 352, 506 and 308 of the IPC. The High Court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hashmat Husain, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 305 of 2026) under IPC sections 308(2), 336(3) and 338. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserted that he was not named in the FIR, and highlighted his poor economic status …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (No. 420 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420 and 406. The State’s Additional Government Advocate argued that anticipatory bail was not maintainable because the alleged offences did not …
The applicant, Ram Kumar Gaur, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 25‑09‑2018 in State vs Ram Kumar Gaur (Case No. 2391/1995) and to stay the pending criminal proceeding (Case Crime No. 693D of 1992) under Section 420 IPC. The High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite a criminal case (Case No. 3404 of 2009) that has been pending for many years. They argued that the matter required a time‑bound disposal. The State opposed, and the court considered …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the proceedings in Criminal Case No. 204 of 2026. The High Court examined the material and observed that, at the pleading stage, it could not be said that no offence was made …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 5946 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh, arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The …
The applicant, Smt Anjana Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite a pending criminal case (Case No. 7448 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 354, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The applicants, Chaudhary Fateh Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 575 of 2019) initiated under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that the FIR contained false allegations and that, …
The applicants, Harsh Patel and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance and summoning order dated 06‑07‑2024 in a criminal case (No. 55342 of 2024) that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. They …
Kishan Chaudhary filed an application under Section 529 of the CrPC seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite criminal case No. 973 of 2024 (State vs. Virendra Singh) involving offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The State opposed the direction only if the lower …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep (Ballu) in a case involving alleged kidnapping, abduction and rape of a minor under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(3) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4(2). The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑03‑2023 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 05‑06‑2023 in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The applicant contended that these …
The High Court considered the bail application of Noor Mohammad, who was arrested in connection with Criminal Case No. 599 of 2025 under IPC sections 340(2), 336(3), 338, 318(4), 319(2) and 61(2). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the alleged firm was registered in the name of …
The applicant, Pradeep Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 13‑09‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑04‑2026 in a criminal case that alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 452, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that Sections 406 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 21‑06‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 13‑01‑2026 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 117(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 333 of the IPC. The High Court …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Special Judge (DAA), Kanpur Dehat, in a 2001 criminal case. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the NBW was issued and that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an application under Section 528 CrPC filed by Naveen Kumar seeking quashing of the cognizance and summoning order dated 30 March 2022 in State v. Naveen Kumar (Case No.1520 of 2022) arising from a crime under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The applicant contended …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Aasim, who was arrested in Crime No. 501 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a forged sale deed. The applicant, represented by Senior Advocate N.I. Jafari and …
The applicant, Rahul alias Prem Shankar, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 in connection with charges under IPC sections 74, 115(2), 351(2), 352 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in case No. 766 of 2025. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the …
The applicants Durvijay and seven others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had reached an amicable …
The applicant, Rovin, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 376 of 2026 for alleged possession of 130 grams of alprazolam powder and charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the Information Technology Act, and the NDPS Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicant, Atif Lari, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 478 of 2019) instituted under Section 307 IPC. The applicant, being the husband of the informant, asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled and a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vandana Joshi, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 245 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. Joshi claimed she was falsely implicated, worked as an agent for Senemi …
Manoj Bhati filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of Case Crime No. 1417 of 2019, which involves offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC, after a CBI charge‑sheet was filed on 30‑06‑2022. The …
The applicant, Rambhan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 280 of 2026) under Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was filed 39 days after the incident, he was not named in the FIR, and the only accusation against him came …
The applicants (Anas and six others) filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings pending against them for offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 354 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants claimed …
The applicant, Shani @ Avneesh Rajbhar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 211 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 304 and 126(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed false implication arising from …
The applicant, Aman Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25-06-2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06-07-2019, and the non‑bailable warrant dated 06-02-2023 in a case registered as Crime No. 478 of 2018 under …
Avdhesh Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 in a case where charge‑sheet had already been filed for offences under IPC s.498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act s.3/4. The learned Attorney‑General objected that the offences were not punishable with imprisonment …
The applicant, Daalchand, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 20‑07‑2013 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 19‑02‑2014 in Crime No. 666 of 2013, which alleged offences under Sections 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. …
The applicants, Khemakaran Kumar alias Niketan and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 23‑02‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 13397 of 2026 relating to …
The applicant, Gyanendra @ Chhotai, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 152 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of …
The applicant, Azad, applied for bail in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 31657 of 2026 concerning Crime No. 152 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant had no prior criminal record and a co‑accused, Ajab …
The applicant, Akhilesh Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑11‑2017 and the accompanying order dated 20‑07‑2026, which were issued after he failed to appear despite having been released on bail in a case …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Pawan, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 383 of 2026 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant pleaded innocence, argued that the allegations were vague, and highlighted the absence of incriminating …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Adesh, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 383 of 2026) under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of incriminating material, and no prior criminal record, while co-accused had already been granted bail. The State …
The applicant, Nemchand, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 540 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The court considered his criminal history, which was explained, and noted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 2207 of 2016, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party …
The applicants, Mustak and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal case No.3494 of 2017, which involved charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 324, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. They claimed that the dispute had been amicably …
The petitioner, an informant, filed an application on 11‑August‑2025 under Section 240 of the Criminal Procedure Code in criminal case No. 2972/2023, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner sought a direction from …
The applicants, Bhola and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 1251 of 2018) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise had …
The applicant, Jaggi @ Ajay Vanskar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 104 of 2025) under Section 103(1) of the IPC and Section 238 of the CrPC. The court noted that co‑accused persons Vipin Verma and Ajay had already been released on bail by a coordinate bench of the same court in a …
The applicant Durgesh filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14‑03‑2024 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1800 of 2023 (Gulab Chand v. Smt. Asha) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Ghaziabad. …
The applicants, Smt. Manju Devi and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 6‑Feb‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 3‑Aug‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 1998 of 2026 arising from Crime No. 285 of 2024. They …
Ranveer applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.138 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Mufeed, had already been granted bail in a similar …
Neelam Tiwari applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.146 of 2026) under Section 103(1) IPC for allegedly assaulting and causing the death of the informant's brother on 19 July 2026. The prosecution alleged that Tiwari, along with two others, inflicted fatal injuries, while the defence argued …
Himanshu Thakur applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 149 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences, including sections 191, 190, 109, 115, 351, 352, 324 and 61, read with Section 7 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932. The police had linked him to eleven cases, but the applicant explained his …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, in Complaint Case No. 50510 of 2019 (Devendra Kumar Sharma v. Anil Kumar Sharma & others) under Sections 504 …
The High Court considered the bail application of Ajeet Singh in Crime No. 438 of 2026, alleged under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR and that the evidence against him was false, including a CCTV clip …
Anuj applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 82 of 2026) filed under Sections 140(1), 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident and was based solely on speculation, with no eyewitness testimony or last‑seen evidence …
Yogesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 06 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 351(2), 352 and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. He sought bail, claiming innocence and arguing that co‑accused who faced identical charges had already been released …
The applicant, Shri Aatif, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 225 of 2026) involving alleged participation in an unlawful assembly under Sections 352, 191(2), 191(3), 103(1) and 190 of the B.N.S.S. The counsel argued that Aatif was not named in the FIR and that the informant’s later …
Anuj Yadav was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act for offences alleged to have occurred in Surajpur, Gautam Buddh Nagar. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial. The court examined the facts, the criminal history of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Singh Yadav, who was in judicial custody for offences under Sections 308, 318, 249, 221, 351, 196 and 61 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was lodged on vague and unsubstantiated grounds …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 110 of 2024 (State vs. Saurabh Kumar et al.) which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite …
Parmanand applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 34 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences, claiming innocence and alleging false implication due to a property dispute. The applicant had been in custody since July 18, 2026 and had no prior criminal record, while co-accused had already been …
