Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17312 judgments · newest first · showing 2001–2200
Maya Shankar Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two non‑bailable warrants dated 28‑02‑2024 and 27‑08‑2026 issued by the Additional Session Judge, Azamgarh, in a trial concerning offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506. The High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 37266/2026, where the prosecution had charged them under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) BNS together. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi …
Gulshan Kumar filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7 May 2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 15 July 2025, and the entire proceedings in State of U.P. v. Rahul and others. The applicant contended that the charge sheet improperly included both …
The applicant Kapil Kumar filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge-sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 03.02.2023 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …
The applicant, Ghoore @ Ashirvad, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 178 of 2026) alleging false implication in offences under Sections 109, 115(2), 333 and 352 IPC. He claimed the FIR was lodged a day after the incident and that there was a …
Kapil Sharma (alias Surendra Kumar) was named among twelve accused in a 2021 assault case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming no prior criminal record and reliance on an interim protection order previously granted in a …
The appellant Bal Kishun was convicted under IPC Section 307 for an offence committed in 1983 and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment. After more than four decades, the appellant, now 77 years old and suffering from serious health ailments, sought a reduction of his sentence, arguing that …
Hari Mohan was convicted under IPC sections 395/397 (and later 307) and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. After serving about two and a half years, he filed a criminal appeal 42 years after the 1984 incident, now being 67 years old and on bail. The appellant argued that the sentence …
The appeal arose from a murder arising out of a dispute over diversion of canal water. The complainant Balak Ram alleged that Chandrapal fired a country‑made pistol at his son Jai Veer, causing fatal injuries, and that the other accused aided the act. The trial court convicted Chandrapal under IPC …
The appellant Raj Kumar was convicted under IPC sections 399 and 402 and Section 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly preparing to commit dacoity and possessing illegal firearms. The prosecution's case relied on police testimony and two public witnesses, one of whom was hostile and denied seeing any …
The applicants (Shiv Pratap Shukla and four others) filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 66 of 2021, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 448 of 2017) alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had reached an amicable settlement outside court, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Uttar Pradesh Code of Criminal Procedure (BNSS) and the inherent powers of the High Court (Section 482 CrPC) seeking to quash Complaint No. 111 of 2022, which alleged that they robbed a motorist under Section 392 IPC. The applicants …
The revisionist, a 17‑year‑old juvenile, was denied bail by the Juvenile Justice Board and the appellate court in a heinous‑offence case. He filed a criminal revision under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, contending that the Board failed to satisfy …
The appellant Shashi Pratap Singh challenged the acquittal of Arun Singh and his mother-in-law Usha Singh for alleged dowry harassment, dowry death and related offences arising from the death of his sister Asmita Singh, who was found hanged within a year of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the …
The husband, Mohd Waris, and nine others were charged under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354, 354-A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act following a matrimonial dispute. The wife filed an FIR, but the parties later reached a compromise through a mediation centre, agreeing to …
The applicant, Vishnu Bawra, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mathura to conclude the inquiry in Complaint Case No. 80117 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 302, 420, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 730 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1079 of 2020, which involved charges under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise dated 25 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 07‑02‑2018 issued in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A and 323 of the IPC. During the hearing, the applicants withdrew their challenge to the charge sheet and only …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 58225 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement on …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli, to decide a pending criminal case (State of U.P. v. Shamsher Khan) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, …
The applicant, Shobha Mishra, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC Court No. 41, Kanpur Nagar, to conclude the pending trial of State v. Rajat Soni (Session Trial No. 293 of 2024) which involves offences …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Court No. VIII, Kanpur Nagar, to dispose of Criminal Case No. 8202185 of 2024 (State v. Avinish Pratap Singh et al.) which …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Genda Singh Urf Genda Lal, who is the father‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have been poisoned. The applicant argued that the allegations against him were false, that the post‑mortem report was inconclusive, and that the primary accused …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Nishad, who was arrested in Crime No.187 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 238(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident, the case relied solely on circumstantial …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash @ Bhunda, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.163 of 2025) based solely on being the last person seen with the deceased. The FIR was initially lodged against an unknown person, but the investigation named the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 17066 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406, 427 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a compromise on 10 June …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 24110 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The case arose from Crime No. 663 of 2023 and was pending before …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC filed by Bhura alias Tej Bahadur, who was accused of offences under Sections 452, 376AB of the IPC and sections 5m/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim’s statement and medical …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Section 307 IPC and Sections 3, 5A, and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, and the learned Additional Government …
The appellants were convicted for offences arising from a violent incident on 28 March 1986 in which the informant Kunjalwa alleged they assaulted him with lathis, fired guns, and caused multiple injuries. The trial court sentenced them under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 323 of the IPC, while one …
The appellants filed an appeal under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking to set aside a summoning order dated 07‑06‑2023 in a criminal case involving offences under IPC sections 354, 504, 506, 379 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va). The parties had entered into a verified …
The applicants Mismetmmar, Kazim Husain and Kaniz Begum filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1855 of 2019) filed under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
Ranveer Singh was arrested in connection with Crime No.210 of 2025, alleged to have committed offences under Sections 123, 69, 351(3), 308(5) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act. After a first bail application was rejected, he filed a second bail petition …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Saurabh, who is accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 325, 504 and 34 for a violent incident that resulted in death. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the fatal abdominal wound was caused by …
Surendra @ Chhotu filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to have the criminal case (State Vs. Surendra) quashed on the ground that the parties had reached a settlement. The pending case involved offences under Sections 452, 354, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and …
The applicants Kanij Begum @ Najma, Kajim Hasain Kha and Darkasha filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 1855 of 2019 (Shahnazbano v. Mismetmmar) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 498‑A …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by L.K. Singh, a director of an engineering college, who was implicated in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs.14 lakh and offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204, 120B of the IPC and Section 13(2) …
Dr. Ajmal Shah Nawaz, a director of an engineering college, was implicated in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs.14 lakh meant for the college, which was deposited into a private individual's account. He sought anticipatory bail under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204, 120B of the …
The appellants, who are pattidars belonging to the Scheduled Caste, filed an appeal against a summoning order issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Basti in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 147, 323, 452, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act. The …
The applicant Manoj filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (State vs Manoj) pending before the Special Judge under the PAKSO Act. The application was based on a settlement agreement dated 19 June 2026 between the parties, which had …
The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a trial summons dated 15.03.2024 for offences under Sections 323, 498‑A and 504 IPC. The applicant and the opposite party (his wife) had settled their matrimonial dispute, withdrawn all pending criminal cases, and the wife confirmed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Khurshid Alam @ Golden, who was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 69, 84, 115(2), 351(2) and 352, and whose alleged offence involved alleged pressure on a woman to convert her religion. The victim’s statements under CrPC …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑12‑2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑05‑2020, and the entire criminal proceedings in State v. Ravi Tiwari (Case No.1248 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 352 and 389 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 03.02.2026 and the entire criminal proceedings arising from non‑compoundable offences (IPC sections 318(4), 191(2), 115(2), 351(2) and 352) in Bareilly. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal trial (Sessions Trial No.187 of 2025) for an alleged offence under Section 306 of the IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise which was verified by the trial court. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjay, accused of rape under IPC sections 70(1), 351(2) and 115(2). The applicant claimed false implication, a six‑day delay in filing the FIR, and that the victim’s statement and medico‑legal report indicated consent. The State opposed bail, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 3740 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was …
Malkhan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 0064 of 2026) alleging offences under IPC sections 87, 64(2)(M), 351(3) and 115(2), purportedly involving the rape of a 23‑year‑old woman. The applicant contended that the victim’s statements under CrPC sections 180 and 183 indicated consent …
The appellant, Sushil Kumar Kushwaha, a Gram Panchayat Secretary, was summoned under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) for allegedly assaulting and caste‑based intimidation of complainant Ranjit Singh who had filed an RTI. The appellant contended that the …
The applicant, Mukesh Kumar Agrawal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No.579 of 2011 (State vs. Mukesh Kumar) relating to offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The parties had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 06.03.2025 and related proceedings arising from a case under Sections 115(2) and 352 IPC. The applicants asserted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the …
The applicant, Chandan Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (State Vs. Chandan Gupta, SST No. 155/2023) arising from an alleged offence under the PAXO Act. He contended that he had subsequently married the alleged victim …
The applicant, Robin Pal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case registered under Sections 305, 331(4) and 61(2)A of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that the FIR was initially lodged against unknown persons and his name surfaced only through a …
Mehkar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 13151 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 386, 387, 388, 389, 506, 190, 188 and 120‑B of the IPC. The parties had amicably settled the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Case No.1745 of 2023) relating to offences under Sections 323, 352 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 7172 of 2012, which involved offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Chief …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 12‑05‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 06‑11‑2025 in Case No. 507 of 2025, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was recorded on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 31‑01‑2026 in State v. Anwar, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was recorded on 20‑08‑2026. The court examined whether criminal …
The High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Anamika Singh and Abhishek Singh in a case arising from a family dispute over ancestral property, where both parties had lodged FIRs against each other. The prosecution alleged assault and minor injuries under Sections 115(2), 352, …
The applicants, Saurabh Tigoria and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance and charge sheet in a special trial under the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2023 and several IPC provisions. They argued that the offence is compoundable and were ready …
The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 01-11-2022 and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1127 of 2020) against them under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. They contended that the allegations were false, baseless and unsupported by any …
The applicant, Sanjay Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 0059 of 2025) arising from a charge of assault under Section 323 IPC, alleged child marriage offences under the Prohibition of Child …
The petitioner, Ramawadh, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C‑II, Chandauli to expedite the trial of Criminal Case No. 2274 of 2016 involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 324 and 325 IPC. The petitioner argued that a …
The applicant, Firm Majid, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (case No. 1072 of 2015) against it for alleged criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC, including a summons order dated 11.07.2016 and a non‑bailable …
The appellant, Parvez, appealed against an order dated 4 June 2026 of the Additional Session Judge (Special Judge SC/ST Act) which rejected his application to have certain documents placed on record. The appellant claimed the documents were with the police station and that, under Section 207 of the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sheikh Mohammad Arif, who is alleged to be involved in offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 204, 120B of the IPC and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicant, a college …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the cognizance order and quash the charge sheet in a Special Criminal Case involving alleged offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children From Sexual …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anuj Kumar, the husband of a woman who died by suicide within seven years of marriage. The charges under Sections 498A, 323, 304B of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 were pending. …
The appellant Dinesh Pal filed a criminal appeal against the State of U.P. and three others, challenging an FIR that alleged offences under Sections 74, 352, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, the B.N.S., Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 3(1)(w)(i) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act. During …
The applicant, Sitesh, was named in an FIR along with six others for alleged murder and related offences under Sections 103(1), 109, 351(3), 3(5) and 61(2). The informant‑witness, who is also the applicant’s brother‑in‑law, claimed that eight unknown persons committed the crime and that the named …
The applicant, Sameeullah, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 29‑03‑2022 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge POCSO) in a case under IPC sections 363, 366 and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. He alleged …
The petitioners, Anita and another, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the police to protect them from threats by private respondents. The first petitioner is a widow and the second is a married man; the State argued that the …
The petitioners, a live-in couple, filed a writ under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the police to protect them from threats by the private respondent and family members. The petitioners argued that they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended that …
The revisionists challenged the Additional Sessions Judge’s order rejecting their discharge application and directing them to appear for framing of charge under Section 302 IPC. They argued that the death certificate and medical reports indicated death due to cardiac‑respiratory failure and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh, accused in a criminal case under Sections 85, 80(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, for allegedly failing to obtain medical treatment for his seriously ill wife who later died of septicemia. The …
Rohit, accused under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 238 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., applied for bail while the trial was pending. His first bail plea was rejected, but a co‑accused, Krishna, had been released on bail on similar factual grounds. Rohit argued that …
Smt. Sudha Singh, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under IPC sections 80(2), 85, 352, 351(3) and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that there was no material to support a presumption of dowry death, and that she …
The applicant filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 104 of 2013) under IPC 420 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 16‑04‑2021 issued by the ACJM Court, Agra. The applicant’s counsel argued that the application should be dismissed and that the applicant …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) against one applicant and a bailable warrant (BW) against two others, both dated 13‑05‑2026 and issued by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Firozabad in State v. Dashrath Sharma & others. …
The applicant, Jyoti Prakash Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons dated 07-10-2020, the entire criminal proceeding (S.T. No.12/2020) arising from a case registered in 2018 under Sections 354(Ka) and 506 of the IPC and Sections 9 and …
The petitioners, a husband and wife who are both adults, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from the private respondent and family members. The husband had earlier been implicated in a criminal case under IPC …
Petitioners Rajne Devi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The standing counsel for the respondents informed the court that an FIR had already been registered in Crime No. 368 of 2026 under Sections 87, 352 …
The petitioners, Vishnu Sikarwar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 24‑07‑2024 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 16636 of 2023) under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Protection of Women …
Manoj Singh, the complainant, filed a transfer application seeking to move Bail Application No.4864 of 2026 (Anup Kaushik v. State of U.P.) from the Aligarh District and Sessions Court to another district court, alleging that the opposing party No.2 is a practicing advocate. The applicant relied on …
Anuradha Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd., represented by Mr. Parth Manoj Jadia, filed a writ petition seeking the partial quashing of FIR No. 0431 of 2025, in which it was named Accused No.4 for alleged cheating and breach of trust. The complainant filed an Affidavit of Consent indicating no …
The petitioners, managing directors of TV9 Media Maharashtra, sought quash of a criminal complaint alleging defamation of a police officer after a news telecast. The original complaint was filed against the editor, and later amended to add the petitioners as accused without recording a fresh …
The applicant, a senior engineer, was charged under Section 304 of the IPC for the death of a labourer when a construction slab collapsed. He argued that he was not present at the time of the collapse and that at most his negligence could attract Section 304‑A, not Section 304. The State contended …
The petitioner, a 73‑year‑old senior citizen, was named as Accused No.6 in FIR No. 121/2018 for causing simple hurt during a land‑dispute‑related assault. The complainant, a woman, consented to the quashing of the FIR against the petitioner. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Lovely Salhotra …
The applicant, Sayyed Mohammed Ali Abbas, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (CR No. 829 of 2023) for alleged offences under Section 295-A of the IPC arising from a dispute over a banner removed from a housing society gate. The …
The petitioners, whose dispute originated in a civil suit, reconciled and filed consent affidavits seeking to terminate parallel criminal proceedings. The High Court examined its inherent power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and the analogous Section 528 of the BNSS) to quash the …
The petitioner, a construction contractor, sought quashing of FIR No. 0328 of 2016 filed under Section 304A IPC for the death of a worker, on the basis of a consent affidavit filed by the victim's father stating that compensation had been paid and that they consented to the dismissal. The High Court …
The applicant, Rajesh Ramavtar Tiwari, sought the return of property including a flat key under CrPC s.457, and the JMFC ordered the return on bond. Respondent No.1, Vijaya Vinod Patil, later filed a separate application to have the key deposited with the court, which was rejected, leading her to …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 305/2016 and the charge sheet filed in Sessions Case No. 6/2017 for offences under Sections 376, 406 and 313 of the IPC. Both parties are adults who knew each other, and ten years have …
The petition sought quashing of an FIR registered under sections 406, 415, 420 and 467 of the IPC arising from a civil dispute over a leave‑and‑license agreement. The parties had settled the civil matter, returned the premises, and jointly requested the High Court to dismiss the criminal proceedings …
The applicants, Ashok Khemchand Kothari & ors., were accused in FIR No. 438 of 2024 for offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120B IPC arising from a loan dispute with the complainant, who filed the FIR on behalf of his deceased wife, a licensed money‑lender. The applicants repaid the entire loan …
The appellant, convicted under the POCSO Act and several IPC sections for sexual offences against his two daughters, was sentenced by a Special Judge to life imprisonment and a fine. The trial court's imposition of a life sentence for the remainder of his life was held to be contrary to settled law, …
The applicant and the complainant, both young adults, were involved in a squabble while playing cricket that resulted in injuries, leading to an FIR under IPC sections 307 and 34. Both parties later consented to quash the criminal proceedings, submitting affidavits of consent. The High Court, …
The parties, all trustees or former trustees of a trust, were involved in a civil dispute over trust property that was settled through a consent decree in a 2025 civil suit. Following the settlement, the complainants sought to withdraw criminal proceedings initiated under various IPC offences by …
Tarachand Maruti Raskar, convicted in 2017 of rape under IPC 376(2)(f) and a child sexual offence under POCSO Act Section 4, was sentenced to life imprisonment and seven years respectively. After serving over fourteen years, he filed an interim application seeking suspension of his sentence and …
The parties, all trustees or former trustees of a trust, were involved in a civil dispute over trust property that was settled through a consent decree in a 2025 civil suit. Following the settlement, the complainants sought to withdraw criminal proceedings initiated under various IPC offences by …
The parties, all trustees or former trustees of a trust, were involved in a civil dispute over trust property that was settled through a consent decree in a 2025 civil suit. Following the settlement, the complainants sought to withdraw criminal proceedings initiated under various IPC offences by …
The dispute arose from a scuffle between two groups of college students in Mumbai, during which one applicant used a belt to strike the complainant, causing injuries alleged to be simple and possibly grievous hurt. An FIR was lodged under Sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 324 and 506 of the Indian Penal …
The applicant, Vinod Parasnath Singh, sought bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and his companion at his dhaba, including beating, belt assault, stick assault, and dousing the victim with petrol. The prosecution …
The petitioners sought consent quashing of criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery arising from a land transaction. The complainant filed a consent affidavit confirming full repayment and requested the FIR and chargesheet be set aside. The Court, invoking its inherent powers under Section 482 …
The petitioner, Vijaylaxmi Amit Bali, sought quashing of two criminal complaints filed by her husband under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The complaints (CR No.353/2019 and FIR No.470/2021) alleged offences such as cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy. The parties reconciled and …
The petitioners, neighbours involved in a 2018 dispute over water pipelines, were charged under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 143 and 149 for rioting and causing hurt. They filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution invoking Section 482 of the CrPC, seeking quash of the FIR (C.R. No. …
The appellant, Krushna Maya Kheloji, was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, the court examined the evidence, primarily the eye‑witness testimony of PW 8, which showed the deceased entered the appellant’s house and was stabbed in a sudden quarrel without …
The appellant, Krushna Maya Kheloji, was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, the court examined the evidence, primarily the eye‑witness testimony of PW 8, which showed the deceased entered the appellant’s house and was stabbed in a sudden quarrel without …
The applicant, Pranit Tukaram Tarphe, was arrested in 2020 for murder (IPC s.302) and has been in custody for six years. The trial stalled because the investigating officer failed to appear on twenty occasions, causing a prolonged delay. The applicant suffers from cervical canal stenosis and had …
The applicant and the complainant, both bullion traders, settled a commercial dispute involving Rs.6.52 crore and sought to have the criminal proceedings initiated in 2019 quashed by consent. The complainant filed an affidavit of consent, and the court considered the applicability of its inherent …
The applicant, Shariq Firoz Shaikh, and the complainant, who are married, sought to have criminal proceedings initiated six years earlier under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and related offences quashed. They filed a consent affidavit indicating their desire to settle the matter amicably. The High Court …
Anita Dixit, convicted under Section 501 of the IPC by a Judicial Magistrate and whose conviction was affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge, applied for suspension of her six‑month imprisonment and bail pending a criminal revision. She was already in custody, having previously been on bail …
The petitioners challenged the magistrate’s order rejecting their discharge application and the subsequent revision order, contending that the FIR did not disclose any offence of criminal breach of trust or cheating. The court examined the statutory ingredients of Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC, …
The applicants, developers, sought quashing of FIR No. 69/2018 filed by the Economic Offence Wing under Sections 34, 406, 409, 420 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 13 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, arising from a flat‑purchase dispute with a complainant. After investigation, the complainant and …
The High Court examined an application under the inherent powers of the court (section 482 CrPC, now section 528 B.N.S. 2023) to quash an order dated 1 October 2016 and the subsequent FIR registered on 7 April 2017 for alleged fraud, forgery and cheating in a land‑development dispute. The magistrate …
The petitioners, owners of several ready‑mix concrete plants, challenged FIR No.0287/2025 filed by a Village Revenue Officer alleging illegal operation and pollution under sections 223, 270, 279 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that the plants possessed all required licences and that, …
The petition arose from a familial dispute between a mother‑in‑law and daughter‑in‑law that was amicably resolved, with both parties filing a consent affidavit seeking quashing of FIR No. 107 of 2022 filed under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC …
The petitioners, whose dispute originated in a civil suit, reconciled and filed consent affidavits seeking to terminate parallel criminal proceedings. The High Court examined its inherent power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and the analogous Section 528 of the BNSS) to quash the …
The petitioner, Vijaylaxmi Amit Bali, sought quashing of two criminal complaints filed by her husband under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The complaints (CR No.353/2019 and FIR No.470/2021) alleged offences such as cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy. The parties reconciled and …
The petitioners and the State were involved in a local dispute over territorial supremacy that led to an FIR alleging simple injuries but later described as grievous. Both parties, now seeking a consensual settlement, filed a writ petition to quash the criminal proceedings. The High Court, invoking …
The appellant, Sanjay H. Bansal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for an offence under Section 498-A of the IPC and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment. He filed a criminal appeal (No. 981 of 2001) challenging the conviction. During the pendency of the appeal, the …
The applicants, Ramesh Kalyankar and family, were charged under IPC sections 420 and 34 for allegedly selling a mortgaged property to Sohil Intikhab Alam Hawaldar despite knowing of the mortgage. The parties later reached a settlement and agreed to file a writ petition to quash the FIR, also seeking …
The appellant, Ganesh Shankar Paraskar, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder (Sec.302 IPC) and also for offences under Sec.307, Sec.323 and Sec.506 IPC, based primarily on two written dying declarations of his wife and corroborative oral statements of two neighbours. He appealed, …
The petitioners, three young students, were charged under IPC sections 323, 324 and 34 for a simple injury that occurred during a New Year house party, where a mistaken‑identity slap led to a scuffle. They filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 …
The appellants, Mohd. Akhtar Raja Mohd. Israil Ansari and Abdul Hamid Abdul Latif Qureshi, were convicted by a Sessions Judge for robbery under Section 394 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. They filed interim applications seeking suspension of the …
The appellants, Mohd. Akhtar Raja Mohd. Israil Ansari and Abdul Hamid Abdul Latif Qureshi, were convicted by a Sessions Judge of an offence under Section 394 read with Section 34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting two informants and stealing Rs.1,90,000 on 15 March 2016. They appealed the …
The appellants, Mohd. Akhtar Raja Mohd. Israil Ansari and Abdul Hamid Abdul Latif Qureshi, were convicted by a Sessions Judge of an offence under Section 394 read with Section 34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting two informants and stealing Rs.1,90,000 on 15 March 2016. They appealed the …
The appellants, Mohd. Akhtar Raja Mohd. Israil Ansari and Abdul Hamid Abdul Latif Qureshi, were convicted by a Sessions Judge of an offence under Section 394 read with Section 34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting two informants and stealing Rs.1,90,000 on 15 March 2016. They appealed the …
The applicant, a jeweller, challenged an FIR and charge‑sheet filed under Sections 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code alleging criminal intimidation, wrongful confinement and criminal intimidation. He claimed that a police constable had illegally seized his driving licence, demanded a bribe, …
Petitioner Vasantrao Morey, a builder, obtained housing loans totalling Rs 18.75 lakh from Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) for five borrowers, allegedly using forged documents. An FIR was lodged under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120B of the IPC. The petitioner repaid the entire loan amount, …
The applicant, convicted of murder under IPC s.302 and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed Criminal Appeal No.186 of 2017. During the appeal he sought to raise a plea of juvenility via Interim Application No.3138 of 2025, which was withdrawn on 18.09.2025 without merits being considered. The …
The High Court considered an interim application by Anmol Atul Jadharao seeking suspension of his five‑year sentence and bail after being convicted under Section 307 IPC for an attempted murder on a college student. The appellant argued that medical evidence cast doubt on the grievous nature of the …
The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal of Navnath Waghmare by the Designated Special Court in a POCSO case where the victim, a minor, alleged rape. The trial court acquitted the accused on the basis that the victim's age was not conclusively proved …
Navnath Waghmare was engaged to Nafisa Joseph, who demanded proof of his earlier divorce. Waghmare refused to produce the documents, leading to a quarrel witnessed by both families. The next day, Nafisa, in a depressed state, locked herself in a room and committed suicide by hanging. Waghmare was …
The applicants were convicted under Sections 353 and 332 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. They had been on bail during the trial and were released on bail after conviction. The applicants filed an interim application seeking …
Zakir Siraj Irani was convicted under IPC sections 394, 506(2) read with 34 and MCOC Act sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4), receiving five years on each count, two years on the intimidation charge and a total fine of Rs.15,30,000. He has completed the substantive imprisonment but remains incarcerated …
The appellant, Rahul Chandrakant Karande, was convicted by a Sessions Court of offences under Sections 353, 332 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 122 and 177 of the Motor Vehicles Act, receiving a two‑year rigorous imprisonment and fines. He filed an interim application seeking …
Vikash Sureshchandra Pathak was convicted under IPC sections 304(II) and 308, and Motor Vehicles Act section 185, and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. He has been in custody since July 2022 and has served over four years. The appellant sought suspension of the sentence and …
The applicant, Ramakant Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17‑05‑2022 issued by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 336, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that the complaint, filed …
The applicants Dharmendra and Kunti Devi filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the charge sheet and stay proceedings in a case filed under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC for alleged cheating. They argued that the offences under Sections 420 and 406 cannot coexist, …
Ankita Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 22‑12‑2022 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur, in a criminal complaint (Case No. 3978 of 2017) filed by her husband Nitin Sharma alleging offences under various IPC …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case arising from a matrimonial dispute, wherein the complainant had filed FIRs alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections …
The appellant, Bichin Sharma, claimed compensation after his motorcycle was hit by a Tata 407 driven on the wrong side of the road, resulting in serious injuries to him and his passenger. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.15,19,140 after reducing the total compensation of Rs.20,25,520 by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 6‑Nov‑2022 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No.1203 of 2021, Meenu Singh v. Mahesh et al.) involving offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and sections 3 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 31675 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 323, 325 and 308 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement outside court, and the compromise was verified by the trial court …
The applicants, Dharmendra Yadav and another, filed a withdrawal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, stating that the underlying dispute stemmed from a matrimonial conflict between the second respondent and her husband. An FIR had been lodged and a charge‑sheet filed in …
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs.24,62,102 as compensation to the widows of a deceased motorcyclist, finding that his death resulted from injuries sustained in a road accident involving a tractor. Reliance General Insurance appealed, contending that the causal link between the …
The appellant Sunil was convicted under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl. The High Court examined extensive inconsistencies in the victim's statements, the testimony of family witnesses, and the lack of documentary …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from a matrimonial dispute, wherein the complainant alleged offences under Sections 498A, 494, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …
The applicant, Avshesh Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 107 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 223 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 503, 506 and 153A IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which …
The applicant, Mukhtar Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order issued by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) in Varanasi. The FIR relating to an alleged offence that occurred in 2005‑06 was lodged only in 2017, and …
The applicants, Yogesh and nine others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheets and the entire criminal trial (Sessions Trial No. 1221 of 2021) relating to offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 506, 352 and 304 IPC. The applicants …
The appellant, Smt. Shashikala Chauhan, alleged that Ajay Yadav repeatedly raped and blackmailed her, threatening to release a video. The trial court acquitted Yadav, finding contradictions in the appellant's statements and no corroborative evidence. On appeal, the appellant argued that the trial …
The applicant, Arun Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the order dated 24‑02‑2026 that framed an alternative charge of Section 302 IPC in a case originally involving Sections 498A, 304B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The original FIR …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 24‑02‑2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been amicably settled and the compromise deed was verified by the magistrate. Both parties’ counsel …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash orders dated 14‑08‑2025 and 12‑05‑2025 and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 4266 of 2025) relating to non‑compoundable offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 10‑04‑2018 and the cognizance order dated 18‑08‑2018 in Criminal Case No.2505 of 2018, which involved offences under Sections 354, 308 and 325 IPC. Both parties had amicably …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 26‑11‑2025. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second opposite …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2497 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 110, 352 and 351(3) of the IPC. Both parties admitted that a compromise had been reached and that the settlement was verified …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash the Sessions Trial No. 231 of 2017, which involved offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicants had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Sessions Trial No.232 of 2017) relating to offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by …
The petitioner, Gaya Shankar Pandey, sought relief to release money held by a financial institution, arguing that the appropriate mode was to make a representation under Section 7 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019. The petitioner had previously filed an application before the …
The applicants, Saransh Manaut and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 406 and 506 of the IPC. The dispute between the parties had been amicably settled, a fact verified by …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 598 of 2020, which involved offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC arising from a 2019 crime. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 28‑07‑2026 and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 06‑12‑2024 in a case where the accused was charged under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS (equivalent to IPC Sections 420 and 406). The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme …
The appellant Mohit was convicted under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC for allegedly abducting and raping a girl who was claimed to be a minor. On appeal, the defence argued that the victim's age was not conclusively proved, relying on a radiological report …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Gupta (alias Nitish Kumar) in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 105 of the IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, noting a delayed FIR, vague allegations, and lack of clarity about …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramesh Chandra Gupta and Aditya Gupta in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed they were falsely implicated and highlighted the belated filing of …
The petitioner, Akshay Tyagi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of Police, Gautam Budh Nagar, to monitor and ensure a fair, impartial, and expeditious investigation of FIR No. 417/2025 involving multiple IPC offences. He alleged that …
The Allahabad High Court considered the third bail application of Tauqeer, accused in Crime No. 164 of 2023 under IPC sections 452, 302, 120‑B/34. The applicant argued that the sole witness PW‑1 did not support the allegations, that he was falsely implicated, has no prior record and has been in …
Shamshad, a 21‑year‑old, was arrested on 7 June 2026 in connection with Crime No. 280 of 2026 under Section 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code (BNS) and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, asserting that the FIR was filed six hours after the alleged incident and …
The applicant, Gautam, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 64, 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was lodged 21 days after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the victim appeared to be a major …
Virendra Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0014 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 339, 3(5) of the IPC and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record, and a co‑accused, Ashish Patwa, had already …
Manish Arya, the step‑father of the victim, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 64(2)M, 76, 115(2), 351(3) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was delayed by seventeen days, and that the investigating officer had not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yashwant Yadav, who was charged under IPC sections 64(1), 333, 352, 351(3) and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Mehdawal. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 16‑year‑old, had given a …
The applicant, a 74‑year‑old litigant, filed a transfer application seeking to move a criminal complaint (Case No. 12563 of 2020) from Meerut to Hapur on the ground of inconvenience. The court noted that the Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts in Uttar Pradesh, 2020, provide a digital …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 28764 of 2026 filed by Ankit @ Sachin Saroj, who was arrested in Crime No.135 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant alleged that the alleged victim, aged 16‑18 as …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohammad Anas under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under several IPC sections, including 115(2), 352, 351(2), 308(5), 309(4) and 61(2). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in a false …
Shahrukh, also known as Sonu, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 69, 87 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim is a major, approximately 18 years old, and the prosecution has not produced any conclusive evidence that the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, alleging that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 23 March 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
Sikesh Paswan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 82 of 2026) under Section 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual assault. The applicant contended that the alleged victim was a consenting party, there was no medical evidence of …
Aman Nishad was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, arguing that the victim's statement was unreliable, the FIR was filed a day after the alleged incident, and there was …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite the disposal of a pending Sessions case (No. 467 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 420, 328, 376, 384 IPC and Sections 66D, 66E of the IT Act. The respondent, the …
The applicant, Tarachandra, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 139 of 2026) under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging a false promise of marriage to a married adult woman. The prosecution alleged that the applicant established a corporeal relationship with the victim …
Harsh Shrivas, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, noting a two‑month delay in filing the FIR and the absence of any …
Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.357 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 363, 3366, 376(2)(n) and Section 51/6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the alleged victim, who had married him and bore his child, had given a consent …
Akash Nagar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑01‑2024 and a summoning order dated 21‑06‑2024 in a criminal case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, according to the Supreme Court’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajan @ Pardesi, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a sexual relationship with a major victim under a false promise of marriage. The prosecution alleged deception, while …
The applicant Rahul sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2026) under Sections 64(1) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication and a ten‑day delay in filing the FIR without explanation. The State opposed the bail, but the court noted the delay, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sabalu in a case registered under Sections 74, 331(4), 351(3), 64(1) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The court noted an inordinate delay of more than one day in lodging the FIR and observed that the alleged victim appeared to be a consenting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanoj Chaudhary, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, highlighted a fifteen‑hour …
Vivek, a 20‑year‑old accused, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 64(1), 77, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged 15 days after the alleged incident without any explanation, and that no indecent photographs or video of the …
The applicant, Vikash Sahini, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.281 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed absolute innocence, stating that no photographic or video evidence of the victim was recovered and that he has no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Kumar, who was arrested on 4 June 2026 in connection with a case (Crime No.186 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the IPC and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, …
Roshan Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.202 of 2026) alleging false promise of marriage, charged under IPC sections 64(2)(m), 351(3), 352 and Sections 5(l)/6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had established a relationship with the victim by promising …
Ravishankar Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.133 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 123, 64(ड), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Evidence Act. The victim is a 19‑year‑old adult and the prosecution lacks clinching evidence that the accused misled the victim. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash charge sheets and criminal proceedings arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute had been settled by a compromise deed dated …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Raghav, was arrested on 21‑02‑2026 in connection with a case (Crime No. 170 of 2026) involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, asserting his innocence and noting that the victim, who had initially testified, turned hostile …
