Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 4001–4200
The petitioner, Bittu Prakash, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged looting of a businessman and was charged under IPC sections 399, 402, 413, 414 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35. He has five prior cases and has been in custody since 12‑11‑2025. The prosecution’s case …
The petitioner, Binda Rai, was charged under several serious provisions of the Indian Penal Code, including sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 302/34. He previously applied for regular bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29206 of 2025, which the Patna High Court rejected on 6 August 2025. …
The appellants, four Yadav youths, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste-based abuse of an informant on 26 March 2024. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing they have clean antecedents, that …
The petitioner, Md Numan Khan, applied for anticipatory bail in a narcotics case (PS Case No. 323 of 2021) where he was alleged to be involved in the possession of brown sugar under Sections 414 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 20(b)(ii)B and 25 of the NDPS Act. The only link to the petitioner was a …
The petitioner, Vikash Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 386 and 387 of the IPC for alleged extortion related to the construction of Khaira Bridge. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons and the petitioner’s alleged involvement rests solely on a co‑accused’s …
Kishnath Ram and his son Manish Ram sought protection from arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 389 of 2024) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they demolished a house and assaulted family members in a land‑share dispute. The petitioners contended they were …
The petitioner, a director and guarantor of a defaulting company, challenged a Look Out Circular (LOC) and a passport endorsement marking his passport as “cancelled without prejudice” that barred his travel abroad. He argued that the LOC was issued mechanically at the request of Canara Bank without …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft. He has four prior cases where his name was implicated solely on the basis of a confessional statement by an inimical accused, Sanjay. …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft. He has four prior cases, and his name was implicated through the confessional statement of an associate, Sanjay, who is frequently arrested …
Mithilesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which several accused, including him, allegedly assaulted an informant’s husband with weapons, causing grievous injuries. The petitioner sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the incident arose from a petty dispute …
The petitioner, Anish Thakur, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 147, 148, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant with a sharp cutting weapon, causing a lacerated wound on the scalp. The …
Kapildev Sharma, a 77‑year‑old member of a school managing committee, was implicated in a case (Telhara P.S. Case No. 87 of 2024) alleging irregular appointment of two teachers, one of whom was his son, under IPC sections 420, 120B and 34. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the appointments …
The petitioner, Devendra Kumar, was arrested on 17 February 2026 in connection with a 2016 dowry case (Telhara P.S. Case No. 31) involving offences under Sections 498A/34 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He had earlier been granted provisional anticipatory bail on 21 July …
Guddu Corex, also known as Jafar Imam, has been in custody since July 8, 2025 in connection with a murder case (Section 302 IPC) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a FIR dated May 12, 2022. The petitioner alleged that the FIR was fabricated, he has a clean antecedent, and …
Virajan Kumar, a resident of Muzaffarpur, was implicated in a case under Sections 414 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 136.8 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He claimed he had a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was …
Vicky Mochi and Vikas Mochi, accused in a 2015 case involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 447, 323, 307, 354, 504 and 506 of the IPC, applied for bail after surrendering on 3 February 2026. They had previously been granted bail, but the bonds were cancelled on three occasions (June 2022, …
Santosh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several IPC offences (sections 414, 467, 468, 471, 420/34) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he was not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, was …
The petitioner, Dingal Yadav, was arrested on 19 July 2025 in connection with a case alleging that he and co‑accused fired two rounds at a Scorpio car, injuring the informant’s son, under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that the FIR was …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 1,017 litres of liquor from four vehicles and charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code together with Sections 30(a), 32(ii), 38(ii) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He pleaded that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Md. Ansarul Nadaf, was implicated in a case under Section 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 585 litres of liquor from four motorcycles and a sack. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time …
Two police constables, Shiv Balak Baitha and Shashi Bhushan Kumar, were accused of stealing three cartons of foreign liquor from the Harnaut police barracks, leading to criminal charges under IPC sections 379 and 34 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Departmental proceedings resulted in their …
The appellants, Ramu Mahto and Bhundul Mahto, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged caste-based assault on 16‑03‑2025. They contended that the FIR was filed five days after the …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was implicated in a complaint under Section 498‑A of the IPC alleging that he abducted a 21‑year‑old woman, solemnised a marriage, and later demanded Rs 5,00,000, subsequently ousting her from the matrimonial home. The petitioner contended that the allegations were …
The appellant, Aman Kumar, was charged under several IPC sections and Section 3(i)(r) of the SC/ST Act in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred on 09.08.2021. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Saran. The appellant …
The petitioner, Sanjiv Kumar Singh, feared arrest in a criminal complaint (Case No.1380/2023) alleging fraud, forgery and other offences under several IPC sections relating to a disputed mutation of ancestral land. He claimed he was falsely implicated as the dispute stemmed from a family partition …
Petitioner Pawan Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent, Rukmani Devi, claimed the dispute was matrimonial and alleged that the petitioner was evading the court. The …
The petitioner, Rajdeo Bhagat, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 406 and 506, arising from a dispute over a Rs 3.70 lakh loan. The complainant claimed the petitioner failed to return the money and threatened him. Both parties expressed a desire to …
The petitioners Jagdish Prasad, Soni Patel and Ravi Patel were implicated in an FIR under Sections 420, 409 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged defalcation of a Rs.300 lakh loan granted by Bank of Baroda. The bank alleged that the loan amount was embezzled through asset stripping and …
The Patna High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jagdish Prasad, the proprietor of M/s Tirupati Refrigeration, and two guarantors, Soni Patel and Ravi Patel, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 409 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged …
The petitioners sought pre‑arrest bail in a case (PS 305/2025) involving offences under several IPC sections for alleged assault and robbery. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the informant, his family members, and stole a gold chain. The court noted that no specific allegation was made …
Roshan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 69 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, alleged to have engaged in a sexual relationship with the informant on a false promise of marriage and subsequently refusing to marry. The petitioner sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that both …
The petitioner, Suryajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Gaurichak PS Case No. 503 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 34 IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded Rs 5 …
The petitioner, Sachin @ Devraj Dharmabhai Pardi, was preventively detained on 27 February 2026 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person" pursuant to Section 2(c). He challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences—registered under Sections …
The petitioner, a former Vidhyut Sahayak, was charged under IPC sections 409 and 427 and Section 140 of the Electricity Act in Special Electricity Case No. 50 of 2006. He filed a criminal revision under CrPC sections 397 and 401 seeking to quash the Special Electricity Judge’s judgment. The High …
Sheikh Irfanaben filed a criminal case under IPC sections 498A, 323, 294A and 506(2) alleging domestic cruelty and other offences. The trial magistrate acquitted the accused on 12‑08‑2024, a decision affirmed by the Sessions Court on appeal. Aggrieved, the complainant filed a criminal revision …
The case arose from a night-time assault and shooting on 10‑11 June 1977 in Azamgarh, for which seven accused were convicted under IPC sections 147, 307/149 and 323/149 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. During the pendency of the appeal, six of the accused died, leaving only appellant Sarda …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 478 of 2021) filed against them under IPC sections 406, 323 and 506. They alleged that the case was false, motivated by malafides and that proceeding would …
The appellants were convicted in 1986 for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 324/149 and 436/149 and sentenced to up to three years' rigorous imprisonment. They appealed, not on the merits, but seeking the benefit of probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, with the State's …
The petitioners, Ashok Kumar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.787 of 2022, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
The appellants Vedram and two others appealed to quash the summoning order dated 4 October 2023 in Complaint Case No.02 of 2022 (Kumari Sarina Vs. Vedram & Others), alleging that the complaint under IPC sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was fabricated. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the cognizance, summons and charge sheet in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. They claimed that a compromise had been reached with the State and that …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Triveni Prasad, who is charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder. The applicant argued that five witnesses had turned hostile, the trial was delayed, and there was no risk of flight or tampering. The State contended …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 31‑12‑2014 and the related proceedings in a case under Section 308 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled by compromise. The trial court had verified the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 100076 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 342, 354, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The applicants sought to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3005 of 2022) filed under several IPC offences arising from a land‑related dispute, invoking Section 528 of the CrPC. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that no offence was made out against them. The State opposed, contending …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 504 and 506 of the IPC. During hearing, the applicants’ counsel withdrew all prayers except to surrender before the …
Shubham Rai was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 43 of 2025) under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the recovered cash and mobile phone belonged to him and that there was no …
The applicants, Prem Pal alias Jaypal and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 20‑02‑2023 in a case registered as Crime No. 386 of 2022 under IPC sections 147, 336 and 323. They alleged that they were falsely implicated, that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal case, charge sheet dated 20.08.2022 and summons order dated 13.02.2024 in State vs. Aman Fauji and others, alleging false implication. The State opposed, contending that the FIR, …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC for Monu Pal, who was arrested in connection with a case under IPC Sections 305, 331(4) and 317(2). The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the alleged recovery of weapons and money lacked independent …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Hariom, who is accused under several IPC sections for allegedly running over a tractor that caused the deaths of Maan Pal and Amar Singh. The applicant argued that the FIR and witness statements contain contradictions, only three of the …
The applicant, Ravindraraja @ Ganu, was arrested in a case (Crime No. 196 of 2024) based on information from an informer, although his name did not appear in the FIR. The prosecution alleged recovery of anklets, coins and Rs.2450, but there was no independent witness and the only evidence against …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Salman in a case registered under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, and that there were no independent …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Salman in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3576 of 2026, seeking release in a case (Crime No. 292 of 2025) under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely …
The applicant sought quashing of the Special Judge's cognizance and summoning order in Complaint Case No.57 of 2025, alleging that the order was passed without granting the accused an opportunity of hearing as mandated by Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and violated …
Sonveer was arrested on 10‑11‑2025 in connection with a case (Crime No. 682 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 305, 331(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was filed on 23‑10‑2025, more than a month after the alleged incident, and the applicant’s name was omitted from it. …
Manoj, the husband of a woman who died within five years of marriage, is charged under Sections 498A, 304B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He has been in custody since December 2021 and has filed three bail applications, all of which were rejected. The court examined …
The applicant Rishabh was arrested in connection with a case originally registered under section 304(2) BNS for alleged murder, but the investigation was later recast as robbery under sections 309(4) and 317(2) BNS. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, no incriminating material …
The applicant, Anand Kushwaha, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 340 of 2024) alleging fraud and forgery related to a sale deed of property allegedly belonging to Jeevan Lal Mishra. He contended that the FIR was lodged by him, the allegations of forgery are false, and that the …
The applicant, Rais, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 06 of 2026) involving alleged fraud and several IPC offences, claiming he had returned the entire misappropriated amount of Rs.5,30,000 to the informant and that the informant raised no objection. The State opposed bail, but the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 89 of 2023 under Section 306 of the erstwhile IPC, alleging their involvement. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 320/2023) in Crime No.197 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Delhi Police Act. No petitioner counsel …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.125 of 2023, alleging offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State’s …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No.63 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the erstwhile IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on …
Petitioners Rishabh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 17 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Hareeshchandra, who was arrested in a case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly cheating a person of Rs 1,00,000 by promising a job. The applicant contended that the FIR was vague, that the alleged receipt of money was …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and seeking quashing of the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 50 of 2023 under Sections 420 and 406 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the learned Additional Government …
Petitioners Kapil Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 318/2023) in Crime No.66 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before …
The petitioners sought to challenge the First Information Report (FIR) and the subsequent charge sheet filed in a criminal case under Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, though the State’s …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet (A-120/2023) in Crime No.101 of 2023 under Section 366 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 420 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No.124 of 2023. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had …
Petitioners Rajesh Gupta and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the FIR and seeking to question the charge sheet filed in a criminal case under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The High Court noted that the charge sheet (No. A‑175/2023) had …
The petitioner, Rajesh Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 281 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered under Section 363 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 217 of 2021. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.106 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 363 and 504 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s …
The applicant, Mohd Hashim, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (Crime No.209/2025) alleging false accusations under IPC Sections 87, 137(2) and 70(1). He claimed innocence, highlighted contradictory statements of the victim’s sister, and pointed to bail …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dr. Akhilesh Dubey, who faces multiple IPC charges including cheating, forgery, criminal intimidation and conspiracy in a property dispute involving alleged usurpation of Waqf land. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sameea, who was accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for alleged involvement in fake sureties filed on behalf of her son, Rashid. The applicant argued that she merely acted as a parivi (representative) for her son, did not arrange the …
The applicant, Asif, was arrested in connection with a theft allegedly committed using a poisonous substance, and was charged under Sections 317(2), 318(4), 303(2) and 123 BNS of the IPC. He contended that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons, that the allegations against him were false, and …
The applicant, Munsarif, sought bail in a criminal case (No. 518 of 2025) where he was accused of fraudulently obtaining a KCC loan of Rs.5,00,000 by posing as Shabir Shah and acting as a guarantor. The FIR, filed by a bank manager, alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit, who was accused under IPC sections 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 309(5) BNS for allegedly causing knife injuries. The prosecution’s case relied on a later statement of the injured party that named Ankit, whereas the earlier statement did not …
The applicant, Sonu Yadav, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Crime No. 208 of 2024) based primarily on the confessional statement of a co-accused, with no other incriminating material recovered from his possession. He has a past criminal record of 28 cases, most of which were concluded …
The applicant, Shekhar Bhardwaj, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 646 of 2025) alleging extortion and an attempt to fire at an informant, though no injury was caused. He has a prior criminal record of eleven cases, including five under Section 307 IPC, but in those cases no injury …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Kumar, who is charged under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged fraud and forgery related to a sale deed. The applicant contended that he was only a witness to the deed and had no prior criminal record, …
The appellant, Harindra Chauhan, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The appellant did not contest the merits but sought liberty to file a bail …
The appellant, Umesh Chauhan, filed an appeal under Section 14A‑1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 27‑11‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 24‑01‑2025 issued by a Special Judge. The appellant alleged that the …
The applicant, Ravi alias Ravindra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 18‑Oct‑2024 in a trial for offences under Sections 307 and 504 IPC. The High Court examined the procedural …
The appellant Ritesh Kumar Srivastav challenged a summoning order dated 5 June 2025 issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Varanasi, which had proceeded against him under Sections 504 and 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. The complaint alleged caste‑based abuse linked …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge‑sheet No. 1019 of 2018 in State v. Gopal Prasad Goswami and others, which alleged offences under various IPC and IT Act provisions. The High Court examined the material and held that, at the …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Mohammad Nazim, who was implicated in a case under the Cow Slaughter and Prevention Act, 1955 (sections 3, 5Ka, 5Kha, 8) and IPC sections 427 and 307. The FIR dated …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ms. Ifrah Islam, who is charged under Sections 124(1), 80(2), 85 BNS and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act for allegedly setting the deceased on fire. The applicant argued that the dying declaration against her is unreliable because the …
The applicant Vinod Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a POCSO case alleging offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 506, 376 and POCSO sections 6/8. The applicant asserted that he had married the victim in 2017, that two …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 341, 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was verified by the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi, who was charged under Section 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at police during an attempted arrest, though no police officer was injured. Ravi claimed the weapon and cartridge …
Premchand Maurya appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside an anticipatory bail rejection dated 15‑02‑2025 issued by the Exclusive Special Judge, Pilibhit, in a case involving offences under Sections 323/34, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 628 of 2019) filed under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. A settlement between the parties was reached on 26 May 2022 and later verified by the Judicial Magistrate on 25 June …
The applicant sought to quash the order dated 01‑07‑2025 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 319 CrPC to summon a third accused, Harikesh, who had not been charge‑sheeted. The matter arose from an NCR filed in 2009 involving offences …
The applicant, Satyam Shivhare, was arrested in connection with a violent incident in Banda district where the deceased was allegedly beaten by a co‑accused identified as Yuvraj. The FIR does not name the applicant, and evidence such as a shop‑owner’s statement and CCTV footage suggest the applicant …
The applicant Amar Chandani and co‑applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (case No. 347/2021) instituted under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 377 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. They asserted that a …
The applicant, Nathilal Rathore, sought bail in a case under Sections 307 and 504 IPC, claiming he was falsely implicated and that the injury to the victim was minor, occurring on a non‑vital part of the body. He alleged a prior grievance where the victim had killed his son, leading to earlier …
The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash Criminal Case No. 17162 of 2007, which involved charges under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably reconciled, executed a verified compromise deed, and the trial court had confirmed the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 19279 of 2024) that involved offences under the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had earlier settled the dispute through mediation at the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of Session Trial No. 88 of 2023, which involved offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 308 and 325. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties to obtain a court‑verified compromise, which they did, and the …
The applicant, Ram Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceeding and summoning order dated 5 January 2026 in a POCSO case (Mahesh Chandra v. Ram Kumar) pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Special Judge (POCSO), Farrukhabad. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jai Kumar, who was charged with gang‑rape, video‑recording of the act, and offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused and a co‑accused raped the victim, recorded the act …
The applicant, Ankit @ Shashikant Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where he was alleged to have opened fire on an informant, though no injury was reported. The applicant argued that the allegation was false, the investigation was pending, and his …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Kishan Singh, who was accused of offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the alleged …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Chandan Singh, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 931 of 2018) involving alleged offences under Sections 409, 417, 120‑B IPC and 66‑C of the IT Act, arising from a complaint under the …
The applicant, Sushil Kumar Katiyar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No.11258/2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 324 and 506, and also sought bail. The High Court examined the material and held that the allegations disclose …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sanjay Bobby Deshwal under Section 482 of the CrPC in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 19 of 2024). The FIR alleged that the applicant, a landlord, was linked to a fraudulent transaction involving Rs. 57,89,776 transferred to …
The revisionist, Vivek alias Kamal Singh Shyoran, challenged the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate refusing his discharge in a case arising from an FIR lodged by Block Pramukh Santosh Devi, alleging blackmail and threats. He contended that the FIR was false, that the informant’s …
The applicant, Rahul Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order and the charge‑sheet in State v. Jyoti Yadav (Case No. 6164 of 2025) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kapil, who had been in custody since October 2020 for alleged murder under IPC Sections 302 and 34. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil Verma (also known as Mohit Verma) in a criminal case (Crime No.210 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑05‑2025 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 408 of 2018) pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Budaun. They alleged that no offence was disclosed against them and …
The applicant, Jitendra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 117(1), 126(2), 110, 191(3), 191(2) and 190 of the IPC. While the application was pending, the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings and bail, challenging a cognizance order and a non‑bailable warrant dated 29‑05‑2018 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑02‑2026. The court examined the allegations, noting …
The applicant, Abhishek Sharma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of a pending criminal case (Case No. 87503 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 323, 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence Protection …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Himanshu, who claimed false implication in an FIR alleging assault with lathi‑danda and iron rod. The applicant, who has three prior criminal cases (two pending, one resulting in conviction), sought …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act (BNSS) by the accused Ompal in a case involving alleged assault with lathi-danda resulting in injuries. The applicant claimed false implication and sought bail to …
The applicant, Akshat Singlar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑framing order dated 24‑02‑2024 and the summoning order dated 17‑01‑2024 in a Session Trial under Section 307 IPC. The applicant argued that a discharge application he had …
The applicant, Moin, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 1877 of 2019) initiated by the State against Dinesh and others under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 411 IPC. The sole ground was that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
The revisionists, Tilakram and two others, filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 11 March 2026, which dismissed their application for discharge in a case involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. They contended that the …
The applicants, Sundaram Pandey and 19 others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 30‑09‑2023 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑11‑2023 in State v. Sundaram Pandey (Case No. 1875 of 2023) which involved offences under several IPC …
The petitioners, Sanjay Jaiswal and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 1‑3‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 3‑11‑2025, and the entire proceedings of State v. Sanjay Jaiswal (Case No. 1054 of 2025) …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dhara Singh, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.02 of 2026) alleging his participation in the beating and death of a man. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the injuries were accidental, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7‑8‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 20‑2‑2026, and the entire proceedings of State v. Mohan Lal and others (Case No. 864 of 2026). The court examined the FIR, …
Birbal Ram filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7 July 2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 21 October 2023, and a non‑bailable warrant dated 26 February 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia, as well …
The applicant, Ashish Kesarwani, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 9 October 2025 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mirzapur, in a case under Section 379 IPC. The High Court examined the record and found no …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Taleem Ansari, who was charged under IPC sections 376, 363, 366, 506, the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) and the Uttar Pradesh Anti‑Conversion Act (section 3/5(1)). The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim was a …
Shailesh Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the proceedings of case no. 29226 of 2023, which involved charges under Sections 420, 406 and 120B IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) cannot be invoked …
Varun Sangwan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 9 February 2026 in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 351(3) BNS. The applicant contended that the charge …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Pal under Sections 2(b)(xi), 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 61 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no conviction in the present case and was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Rakesh Kumar, who is charged under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Anil Gaur and two others who were named in an FIR for a stone‑pelting clash in Hathras. The applicants disclosed modest criminal histories but asserted they had no role in the incident and were …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑11‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, alleging false implication and mala‑fide motives. The magistrate had taken cognizance based on a prima facie view of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑11‑2019 and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 40 of 2019, as well as a later order dated 11‑11‑2025 passed in Criminal Revision No. 12 of 2020. The court examined the record and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 5 January 2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 23 July 2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 790 of 2025 arising from offences under Sections 147, 283, 341, …
Rafuddeen filed an application under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction seeking to quash the order dated 25‑02‑2026 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, POCSO) which had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application for further cross‑examination of prosecution witnesses …
Chandresh Yadav was arrested in a case registered as Crime No.06 of 2026 under Sections 123, 351(3), 64 and 78 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly taking indecent photographs of a female relative, blackmailing her and demanding money. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, …
The applicant, Bhagwat Nishad, father‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was arrested under IPC Sections 85, 80(2), 108 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The deceased was found hanged and the post‑mortem report indicated no injury to the hyoid bone, suggesting a possible suicide. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking bail in a case where they were alleged to have committed offences under Sections 323, 380 and 504 of the IPC, as recorded in a police report dated 10-11-2025 and an order dated 25-02-2026. The High Court examined the material …
The retired District Judge Tariq Manzoor Khan, who had filed the original FIR in a case involving sections 467, 468, 420 and 120B IPC, was summoned as a prosecution witness by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj. Khan, now 75 and residing in Pune, argued that the original FIR was not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitish Kumar (alias Sitaram) in a criminal case (Crime No. 349 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the 18‑year‑old victim was a consenting party who had …
The applicant, Shani Kumar Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 25‑08‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 06‑02‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No. 31 of 2026) arising from FIR under Sections 106(1) and 281 of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 181 of 2024) arising from matrimonial disputes involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 354 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sushma, who is accused in a case involving IPC offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and conspiracy, as well as offences under the Prize Cheats and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of Criminal Case No. 9518 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 147, 325, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and had been pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑I, …
Sharik Aalam was arrested in a case under IPC sections 69, 351(2) and 351(3) BNS for allegedly establishing a relationship with a 24‑year‑old woman on a false promise of marriage and then abandoning her. The prosecution alleged that the victim was misled and that the applicant had gone abroad. The …
The appellant challenged the acquittal of the husband and in‑laws of Sanju Verma in a dowry‑death case. The prosecution alleged that the accused harassed the deceased for dowry and caused her death by poisoning, invoking Sections 302/34, 304B, 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The applicants, Rajesh Sharma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 4‑8‑2025 and the charge‑sheet dated 18‑5‑2025 in State v. Rajesh Sharma (case 24124/2025). They contended that the charge‑sheet …
The applicant, Chhotelal Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the order rejecting his discharge application in a case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 IPC. The applicant …
Nitin Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No.30 of 2026, alleged to involve offences under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a five‑day delay …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas Yadav, who was charged under Sections 109(1), 118(1) and 123(1) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting a person named Rinku with sharp edged weapons. The applicant argued that the injuries were simple, he had no prior criminal …
The petitioners (Viri Singh and others) filed a criminal revision challenging the Special Judge’s order dated 09‑02‑2026 that dismissed their application for discharge and framed charges under IPC sections 147, 323, 354, 504 and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. They contended that the victim’s statements …
Mithilesh Kumari filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2025 in State of U.P. v. Mithilesh Kumari (Case No. 11889 of 2025). The applicant argued that the charge sheet improperly invoked both Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS (equivalent to IPC …
The applicant, Durgesh Kumari, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 13010 of 2025) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 420, 406 and 506 of the IPC. The sole ground raised was that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
The applicant, Chandra Churn Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a non‑bailable warrant issued in Criminal Case No. 1650 of 2003, relating to offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court examined the …
The applicant Junaid was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which Babu died and Javed was injured. While the FIR named 14 persons, the initial statements of the victims did not implicate Junaid, and later statements were contradictory but did not specifically allege that he caused the …
Pooran Chand Virat filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 3 October 2025 and the charge sheet in State vs. Pooran Chand Virat (Case No. 91924 of 2025) which alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504 …
The applicant, Sabir Husain, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a complaint case involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 506 and 406 of the IPC. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Aliyar Ram, a former Assistant Development Officer, who was alleged to have been involved in the illegal sale of food‑grains under the fair‑price shop system. The offences alleged against him included sections 409, 420, …
The applicants, Shesh Narayan Tiwari and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 04‑02‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 30‑07‑2024, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 223 of 2024) relating to …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6073 of 2012) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute through a compromise dated 21‑02‑2026. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 05‑07‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 07‑08‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 19149/2023, which alleged offences under Sections 380, 447, 448, 504 and 506 IPC. The sole ground raised was that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shavej, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam Yadav, accused in a dowry‑related death case (Crime No. 0125 of 2025) under Sections 80(2), 85 B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant contended that his wife died by suicide, supported by an autopsy …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rambabu, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 113 of 2025) involving IPC offences (420, 468, 471, 120‑B) and IT Act offences (66C, 66D). The applicant …
The appellant, Ketan Patel, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging a bail order dated 03‑04‑2026 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Jhansi. The appeal arose from a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 442 …
Vinay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 6‑12‑2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 1‑10‑2024 in State vs. Akhilesh Yadav (Case No. 23786 of 2024). The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet improperly alleged offences under Sections …
The applicants, Yusuf and five others, were charged under Sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 489 (robbery) of the IPC for an alleged offence in Saharanpur. They filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and the cognizance order, contending that Section 447 cannot be …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aman (alias Amaan) in a case under several IPC sections relating to alleged indecent assault and related offences. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing out a four‑day delay in filing the FIR, the absence of any indecent …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shadab, accused in Crime No. 90 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 352 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 4 and 5 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the key witnesses had turned hostile …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Lallan Kumar, who was arrested in a complaint case involving IPC sections 323, 498-A, 377, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely …
The applicant, Mauseem alias Mohsin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC after a summons dated 26.05.2022 in a case alleging offences under Sections 302 and 506 IPC. He claimed innocence, asserted that the allegations were false and that he had been exonerated during …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 31‑03‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 23‑05‑2024 in Case No. 21861, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 323, 506, 452 and 448 IPC. Their sole contention was that the charge‑sheet under …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Praveen Kumar Gupta, who was implicated in a FIR for alleged trade tax evasion and charged under IPC sections 420, 467 and 468. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, that the case had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jahid, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 127(2), 70(2) of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual activity with a girl who was reportedly under 17. The applicant contended that the relationship …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jadawati Vishvakarma, who was alleged to have participated in the assault leading to the death of an informant’s wife. The FIR named her among six accused, but the post‑mortem report indicated injuries that were old and the cause of death was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 16178 of 2020) on the ground that they had reached a compromise dated 19‑12‑2025. The State opposed, contending that the trial court must first verify the existence and terms of any …
The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and the Regional Passport Officer, Varanasi, to issue a police verification certificate and passport despite a pending criminal case (Case Crime No. 131 of 2025). The respondent had refused to …
The applicant Suman Mishra filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a criminal case (State Vs. Dilip Kumar Mishra) pending since 2011, involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 406, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC and Sections …
The High Court considered the bail application of Mohit Sharma, who was arrested in connection with a fight alleged under several IPC sections and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had only a general role in the FIR, no weapon was …
Kundan Singh Patel @ Vishal applied for bail in a case arising from S.T. No.818 of 2024, where he is charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. This is his second bail application; the first was rejected on 13‑Jan‑2026. The applicant offered no new ground for bail …
The applicant Kanchan Bharti filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 2432 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 323, 504, 506 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The matter was before …
Arun Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an FIR dated 09‑04‑2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel withdrew the main relief sought but requested that the …
Petitioner Narendra Bansal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR dated 01.04.2026, alleging that the matter was a civil dispute improperly converted into criminal prosecution under IPC sections 316(2), 352 and 351(2). The State and the first informant opposed, contending …
Petitioner Dinesh Kumar, an informant, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (Essential Commodities Act) of Bareilly to decide an application filed under Section 358 of the BNSS, which has been pending since 2025 and relates to a …
Petitioner Harshit filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 6 March 2026 registered under Sections 333, 109, 108(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew his challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Meena Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman who allegedly died by suicide within two months of marriage. The applicant argued that the death was a suicide, citing the post‑mortem report showing a hanging with no other injuries, and that she …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal of Criminal Case No. 9444 of 2021 (State of U.P. v. Harendra) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ghaziabad. The case, involving offences under Sections 323, …
Petitioners Surendra Mohan and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction …
The petitioners, led by Ankit Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 1‑April‑2026 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead …
Petitioners Narendra @ Nagendra Singh Gurjar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging an FIR dated 19‑04‑2026 registered under Sections 306, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. They contended that a transfer order issued by one of them in the …
The applicant, Noor Jahaan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Sessions Court order that rejected his Section 311 CrPC application to recall a material witness, Dr. Nitin Sharma, who performed the post‑mortem in a 498A, 304‑B and Dowry Prohibition Act case. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nadeem, accused in a criminal case under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged that the victim, a 17‑year‑old who was pregnant, had consented to the relationship and was willing to marry him, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Mahaveer, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 103 of 2020) involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 504 and 308 of the IPC. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested, had …
Petitioners Deen Dayal and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25‑04‑2026 registered under IPC sections 137(2), 352 and 351(3) BNS. During the hearing the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower …
Petitioners Vikram Kushwaha and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04‑03‑2026 registered under Sections 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing they withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 4843 of 2021) on the ground that they had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise dated 20‑04‑2026. The State opposed, contending that the trial court must first verify the …
