Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 4201–4400
Petitioners Kaley and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 29.03.2026 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. They later withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider their bail …
Aneeta Yadav applied for bail in a murder case (Crime No. 29 of 2026) where she was alleged to be involved in a land dispute that led to the death of a woman. The prosecution’s narrative implicated other accused, particularly Babulal, while no specific allegation was made against Aneeta. Her counsel …
The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Mittal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order for the expeditious disposal of a pending Session trial (Case No. 645 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 302 and 120‑B IPC. The trial had been pending for a long period …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Chintu @ Brajesh Kumar, who was charged under IPC sections 87, 61(2), 137(2), 64(1) and POCSO Act sections 5(j)(2) and 6 for allegedly enticing the informant’s 17‑year‑old niece, resulting in pregnancy. The applicant argued that he was …
Vimla Devi filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑12‑2024 in State vs. Vimla Devi, wherein she was charged under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of the chargesheet dated 10‑02‑2026, the cognizance order dated 27‑02‑2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 358 of 2026 arising from FIR charges under IPC sections 126(2), 131, 118(1), …
Petitioner Ali Ahmad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 06-04-2026 registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. During hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court consider his bail …
The applicant, Sahil, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 5 May 2025 issued by the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C. in a criminal complaint (Smt. Sadaf vs Sahil) under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil, who was arrested in Crime No.40 of 2026 under IPC sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 109(1). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the FIR named him incorrectly and that the injuries alleged to have been caused by him …
The applicant, Ankita Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 1042 of 2023) involving allegations under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic …
The applicant, Shyampal, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 19‑03‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj, in a criminal case (Cr. No. 252 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 363 and 376 IPC. The applicant contended …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhual Gupta in a murder case (Crime No. 36 of 2026) where the applicant was not named in the FIR and was allegedly implicated only on the basis of three witness statements that he was seen leaving the scene. The applicant argued that there was no …
Pawan Kumar Gautam filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court’s direction to expedite two pending applications dated 04.01.2025 and 25.08.2025 in Sessions Trial No. 714 of 2024 (State v. Hamid Ali & Another), which involve offences under IPC sections …
The applicants, Ramchandra Rai and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 07‑01‑2019 and a subsequent order dated 30‑03‑2026 in State v. Ramchandar case, which arose from an FIR under IPC sections …
Petitioners Anchal Vishwakrma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 registered under several IPC provisions and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The State argued that the FIR was prima facie established based on statements …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Sub‑Inspector Sunaheri Lal and five others, who were charged under Section 395 IPC for an alleged offence in Sahavar, Kasganj. The applicants, through counsel, sought to withdraw the …
Petitioner Harish Chahar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20‑04‑2026 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the victim’s injuries established a prima facie case, which the petitioner could not rebut. The petitioner …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tanveer, accused in a case under Sections 352, 351(2) and 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault and rape. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a 15‑day delay in filing the FIR, absence of medical evidence, no recovery of alleged …
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 29‑07‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 10‑06‑2025 in State v. Vijay Kumar Maurya (Case No. 2125 of 2025). The chargesheet alleged offences under Sections 419, …
The applicant, Ram Chandar Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑03‑2026 issued in Criminal Case No.6568 of 2007 (State vs. Radhey Shyam) involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sanjay Kumar Pandey, who was in custody for alleged offences under IPC sections 377, 504, 506 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act involving a child victim. The applicant …
The applicants, who are on bail and facing trial in Criminal Case No.51 of 2001 (involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 494, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act), filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings. The court noted that non‑appearance had led …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilip Kumar Patel, accused of murder, kidnapping and conspiracy under IPC sections 302, 364, 201 and 120B. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Anil Patel, had been released on bail in a similar case, that he had no prior criminal …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 928 of 2022, which involved charges of dowry harassment and assault under IPC 498‑A, 323, 354 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a mutual settlement on 25 September 2023, which was …
Santosh Saini appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to quash a Special Judge's order rejecting his anticipatory bail application in a case involving offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The appeal was listed, but no …
The accused, Usman, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 161 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 64, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed five days after the incident without any explanation and that there …
The applicants filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC and Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Special Session Trial (No. 55 of 2023) arising from a complaint under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and the SC/ST Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anjesh, accused in Crime No. 126 of 2025 under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no medical background, and that the post‑mortem report could not determine the cause of death, with the …
Krishna Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving alleged violations of the IPC, Income‑Tax Act and Public Gambling Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, that the mobile number and transaction attributed to him were false, and that there was no independent or …
Mohd Rafeeq applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 11 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, Income Tax Act and Public Gambling Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, that the mobile number and transaction attributed to him were false, and that there …
Ranveer Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 11 of 2025) based solely on information from an informer, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The applicant contended that the mobile number and alleged transaction attributed to him were false, and that there was …
The applicants Rajendra and Aslam filed an application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. and Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 96 of 2024 (Ram Prasad v. Rajendra) filed under Sections 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(VA) of the SC/ST Act. The application also …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 07.03.2025 in a complaint case arising from an FIR lodged on 07.07.2022 under IPC sections 323, 427, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(da). They alleged that the prosecution case was …
The applicant, Amit Kumar Paswan, was charged in a Session Trial for offences under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. He married the victim on 17 June 2025, and the victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC indicated no allegation against him and expressed love for …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul, who is charged with offences under Sections 304, 308, 452, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR …
The applicants, Lakhami Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 58212 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 325 IPC. While initially seeking quash, the applicants later …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Session Trial No. 1755 of 2025) arising from a Section 307 IPC case. The applicant later withdrew the merit of the application and only requested permission to move a discharge …
The husband (revisionist) appealed a Family Court order that granted his wife maintenance of Rs 10,000 per month under Section 125 of the CrPC, directing payment from February 2020. He argued that the wife was capable of earning, that the marriage involved dowry disputes, and that she was mentally …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitin Kumar Divyant, who is charged under IPC sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B for allegedly withdrawing post‑retirement benefits of a State Bank of India employee via an ATM card. The applicant contended that he was never named in the FIR, …
The petitioner, Neeraj Devi, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside the dismissal of her complaint alleging dowry harassment, domestic violence, and related offences by the Judicial Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge. She claimed that her husband and in‑laws had demanded …
The applicant, Mohit Saini, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 324 and 504 IPC. He later indicated that he was not pressing any substantive relief and only …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farman alias Bhoot, who is charged under Section 109 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on a police party, though no police officer was injured. The applicant has a substantial criminal history, with 21 …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 35494 of 2025 filed by Anuj @ Vinod Jatav @ Vinod, who was arrested in Crime No. 235 of 2024 under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no material had been recovered from him, and …
The applicant, Saddam, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11 September 2016 and the related cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 308 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant and the second …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, accused in Crime No. 390 of 2024 for offences under IPC sections 147, 302, 307, 34, 504 and 506. The FIR alleged that Vikas and co‑accused assaulted the deceased, who later died, and also injured a witness named Vipin. During …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akhilesh Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 420 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code relating to a disputed property transaction. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that he merely returned Rs. 20 lakh to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Quraishi, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cow slaughter offences. The applicant contended …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Quraishi, who was accused under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cow‑slaughter offences. The applicant claimed the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 196 of 2016 (State v. Ramesh & Ors.) relating to offences under Sections 420, 406, 467 and 468 IPC. The High Court had earlier referred the matter to its Mediation and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 5976 of 2025, alleging that they had reached an amicable compromise with the second opposite party. Both the State’s Additional Government Advocate and the …
The applicant, Sanjay Kumar Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 893 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 506 and 354‑A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicant, Jitendra Kushwaha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 7 February 2024 issued by the Civil Judge (Offence Against Women) in a criminal case involving allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ravindra Pal Singh in a 2013 case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant pleaded innocence, contended that the allegations were fabricated, and highlighted that the co‑accused had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 458 of 2025) arising from offences under sections 70(1), 127(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS, on the ground that a verified compromise had been reached with the victim. The trial court had …
The applicant, Saurabh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order dated 30 September 2024 and 19 December 2024 respectively, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. …
The applicants, Shahzad and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 7464 of 2024) alleging offences under various IPC sections. They claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ranu @ Rana Singh, who was arrested under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC in a case registered in 2006. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that the police recovery was fabricated, and highlighted the absence of any eye‑witness or …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 693 of 2021) arising from offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. After hearing, the applicants indicated they no longer wished to pursue …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Parvez, accused in Crime No. 423 of 2025 under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed the allegations were false and based solely on suspicion, and highlighted that he had previously been granted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak, accused in a case under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the dispute was essentially civil, with no direct …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 8 February 2023 and the related criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Mainpuri. The …
The applicant, Ashok, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1917 of 2020) arising from alleged offences under Sections 354, 354‑B, 506 of the IPC and Sections 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicants, Jahid and eight others, were charged in Criminal Case No.25855 of 2022 for offences including rioting, assault and criminal intimidation. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of the charge sheet dated 28‑08‑2022 and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dheeraj Sahani, who was charged under Sections 69, 93, 352 and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly promising marriage to a woman in exchange for the disposal of a newborn girl and then refusing to marry her. The prosecution alleged a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jay Singh, who was arrested on 29‑08‑2025 in connection with Crime No.130 of 2025 under IPC Sections 109 and 115(2) BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, stating he was only alleged to have assaulted an informant whose statement was not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pappu Chaubey (Aneesh Chaubey) in a case under IPC sections 310(2), 352 and 61(2) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, lack of incriminating material, and cited that co‑accused had already been granted bail in similar cases. The State opposed …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 36208 of 2024) arising from a dowry-related complaint under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Anshu Kumar Dubey, who was charged under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no recovery was made from his possession, and argued that there were no eye‑witnesses or …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 04‑12‑2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 19‑10‑2024 in a POCSO case (Sections 363, 366, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 POCSO Act). They claimed they were …
The applicant, Rajnish Singh @ Sahil Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 277/2025) under IPC sections 109(1), 303(2), 317(2) and 317(4). He contended that he was falsely implicated and argued that co‑accused who faced the same charges had already been granted bail, invoking the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramveer and another accused in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 191(2), 125, 115(2), 118(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 427 of 2022) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, where the parties amicably settled the dispute …
The applicant, Pushpendra Kumar Alias Dev, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 393 of 2024) arising from a POCSO case involving offences under Sections 363, 354, 323, 34 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.T. No.280 of 2024 & 08/2025) arising from a case registered under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 307. They asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled through a compromise and that …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kashyap, who was arrested in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that his involvement was limited to assisting an informant in a …
Bhullan Singh, the accused, filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order dated 13-10-2025 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr, which dismissed his discharge application under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition sought to overturn the …
The petitioner, a former Assistant Agriculture Inspector appointed in 1968, was suspended in 1975 following an FIR under Section 409 IPC and subsequently terminated on 30‑12‑1976 after a departmental inquiry. He was acquitted of the criminal charges on 04‑01‑2024 and thereafter wrote to the Director …
The appellants, Sameer Singh and another, appealed under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act challenging a summoning order dated 27‑02‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, Varanasi, in case Pappu Sonkar v. Sameer Singh & Ors. The order had summoned them to face trial under IPC …
The applicant, Ashok Dangi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1232 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 354-A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. After hearing, …
The applicants, Smt. Krishna and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal charge sheet and proceedings arising from alleged offences under Sections 420, 120B, 342, 504 and 506 IPC. They claimed that the dispute had been amicably settled by …
Vikas was arrested in a murder case under Section 302 IPC for the death of his wife. The prosecution alleged that Vikas quarrelled with the deceased and murdered her, while the defence claimed the wife accidentally fell from a balcony and Vikas merely took her to hospital. The defence highlighted …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Smt. Jameela, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, in Crime No.152 of 2023, which alleged her involvement under Sections 498‑A, 323 and 304‑B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant contended that …
The applicant, Rakesh Verma, sought to quash Criminal Case No. 3727 of 2008 (State vs. Rakesh Verma) arising from offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled with the second opposite party. Both parties, through their counsel, submitted that a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal case No.118 of 2018 (State vs. Nasir et al.) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the existence of the compromise and were …
The applicants, Shoyab and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 2394 of 2023) arising from Crime No. 107 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 363, 366A, 120B of the IPC and Sections 16/17 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash and stay the criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 22 of 2024 (Rammoorat v. Manoj Maheshwari et al.) which involved charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and the SC/ST Act. During arguments the counsel for the …
In Criminal Appeal No. 849 of 2001 (Raj Bahadur v. State of U.P.), the appellant and the State agreed to settle the dispute out of court and filed a joint affidavit evidencing a compromise between the appellant, the informant Punjab Singh, and the injured witness Rampati. The High Court, after …
Sunita Singh and another appealed against a Special Court order that partially rejected their discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C., leaving them charged under Sections 417, 420 IPC and Section 3(2)(5a) of the SC/ST Act. They contended that Section 3(2)(5a) could not apply because the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 13-10-2024 and the cognizance order dated 30-01-2025 in State v. Rupesh, which involved offences under Sections 110 and 352 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a …
Vijendra Ram, the petitioner, has been in custody since 15 January 2021 in connection with a case involving alleged arson of a victim's daughter over a dowry dispute, with charges under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 307, 34 and 304(B) of the IPC. The petitioner contends that he was not present at the …
The petitioner, Munarik Turiya, was arrested on 8 April 2023 in connection with a 2021 case alleging that he, along with others, attempted to rape a minor girl under Sections 376(A), 376(B), 376(D) of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement was recorded under Section 164 of …
The petitioner, Sunil Rai, was arrested on 14 May 2023 in connection with a murder case (Jandaha P.S. Case No. 140 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that Rai, along with his brother Subodh and daughter‑in‑law Baby Kumari, conspired …
The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault and theft related to a loan dispute with the informant, who is his sister-in-law. The informant claimed the petitioner had taken a loan of Rs. 4,50,000 and …
The petitioner, Tanjil Islam, is in custody for alleged dowry‑related homicide under IPC sections 341, 324, 304(B) and 34. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner repeatedly stabbed his wife, leading to her death. The petitioner argues that he has already spent three years in custody and that …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, was arrested on 15 November 2022 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 34 IPC) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. He filed multiple bail petitions, all of which were rejected, the latest being in this proceeding. The petitioner argued that he had …
The petitioners, Ramashray Das and Laxman Das, were arrested in June 2023 in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged members of an extremist gang. They filed three successive applications for regular bail, the first …
The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Sultanganj P.S. Case No.254 of 2024, which alleged his involvement in a murder and related offences under Sections 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. The trial court had earlier …
Lakhindra Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Bathnaha Case No. 73 of 2023) alleged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case rests on a self‑inculpatory statement by co‑accused Sikindar Rai, who claimed that Yadav and others pressed the …
Petitioner Pawan Rajbhar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he fired upon the brother of an informant, resulting in death. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent, …
Munna Kumar Chaudhary applied for regular bail in a murder case (Section 302/34 IPC) and illegal possession of arms (Section 27 Arms Act) arising from a 2020 FIR in Majhauliya, West Champaran. The FIR did not originally name him; his name emerged from a co‑accused’s confessional statement, and he …
The petitioner, Satish Kumar, was charged in a 2022 case for murder under Section 302 IPC, criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC, and illegal possession of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired on an informant’s father resulting in death. He applied for bail before the …
The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, was arrested on 4 January 2025 in connection with a Mahila Police Station case involving alleged rape, cheating and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 376, 420 and 120(B). The FIR, lodged on 25 November 2024, records an alleged incident on 21 December 2023 and was …
The petitioner, Ashraf Ali, was arrested in connection with a case registered under PS‑24 of 2023 for alleged offences including theft, kidnapping for ransom, dowry death, hurt and criminal intimidation, as well as violations of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that he, together …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a double murder case arising from a rivalry over sand ghats, alleged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Although his name does not appear in the FIR, it was mentioned in a self‑inculpatory …
Dharmendra Ram, the petitioner, was arrested on 10 March 2025 in connection with a dowry death case (Sections 304B, 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act). He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the FIR was fabricated, noting that co‑accused had previously been granted …
Chandan Kumar Yadav was arrested on 26 April 2025 in connection with a police case involving alleged offences under Sections 379, 411, 413, 414, 420, 467, 468 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from a vehicle checking operation where two motorcyclists attempted to flee. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Devan Yadav, was charged under IPC sections 364(A) (kidnapping for ransom) and 34 (common intention), Arms Act section 27, and UAPA sections 16 and 18 for allegedly kidnapping two persons with a group of 30‑40 Naxalites for extortion. The trial was delayed because co‑accused and the …
Petitioner Putun Chaudhari was charged under Sections 302, 201, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC for the alleged murder of his wife, Sunaina Devi, in a dowry‑related dispute. He had been in judicial custody since December 2021 and his earlier bail application was rejected, with permission to re‑apply …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was named in a complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty and other offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 379 and 498A, as well as Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, for allegedly demanding a dowry of Rs 10 lakh. The petitioner filed a bail petition, contending …
Sunita Devi was charged under Sections 363, 364, 302, 201 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Sunil Singh. She sought regular bail, arguing that the only basis for her accusation was a confessional statement to police, which she claimed has no evidentiary value. The prosecution …
The petitioners—Rajesh Mukhiya, Geeta Devi and Kanhaiya Mukhiya—were named in an FIR for alleged assault and other offences arising from a land‑dispute in Yogapatti, West Champaran. The FIR alleged that they assaulted an informant and his son, causing bodily injuries, with an alleged intention to …
The Patna High Court heard an application for anticipatory bail filed by six petitioners accused of assaulting an informant and other offences under the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners No.2 and No.5 withdrew their applications, which the court permitted, dismissing those applications as withdrawn. …
Harinarayan Gupta applied for anticipatory bail after a looting incident in which co‑accused Bablu Yadav was caught and, through a captured accomplice Pappu Yadav, identified the petitioner as having facilitated the escape. The FIR records only the co‑accused’s statement linking the petitioner, with …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Korha P.S. Case No.25 of 2024) involving IPC sections 341, 323, 504 and 506/34. Initially the case comprised bailable offences for which bail was granted, but non‑bailable sections were later added in the charge‑sheet. The court …
The petitioner, Bhushan Shama, was implicated in a Naxalite attack on a construction site, charged with multiple IPC offences, a provision of the Arms Act and the CLA Act. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was vague and that a co‑accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed …
Rajnikant Kumar was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged cheating of Rs 8,11,927 through a PhonePe scam, charged under IPC sections 419 and 420 and IT Act sections 66(c) and 66(d). The prosecution alleged that the complainant’s money was siphoned via an app suggested by PhonePe customer …
The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Hema Kumari, who was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly forging a marksheet to obtain a contract teaching post. The petitioner argued that she resigned from the …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in an FIR alleging assault on an informant and his brother, with charges under several IPC sections. Petitioner 1 was specifically accused of assault with an iron rod causing a grievous injury to Md Moim, while petitioners 2 and 3 faced …
The petitioner, Kaif Ansari, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) based on a FIR filed in 2022. The FIR did not name him; his alleged involvement emerged solely from the confessional statement of a co-accused, Pradeep Giri, and no material evidence was recovered from his …
The petitioners, eight members of a family from Piprahi village, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 141, 341, 323, 427, 354(b), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the alleged assault on an informant and her sister involved only …
Krishna Yadav, a 73‑year‑old accused of multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code including murder (Section 302), sought regular bail for the second time. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted Govind Sharan, causing his death, and that several witnesses had already been examined. The …
The petitioner, Nisar Haidar, was arrested in connection with a fraud case (Madhubani P.S. Case No. 332 of 2025) alleging that he induced an informant to pay Rs. 3.70 lakh for a Hyundai car that was never delivered, issued dishonoured cheques and failed to refund the amount. The petitioner applied …
The petitioner, Kamdev Paswan, filed a second anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a murder case (IPC §§302, 201, 34) arising from the death of Khushi Kumari. The FIR alleged that the petitioner’s son, Dewvrat Paswan, and another co‑accused murdered the victim and that the petitioner’s …
The petitioners, Radha Tiwari and Ram Ekbal Sahani, were implicated in an FIR alleging extortion of Rs.5,00,000 and several other offences arising from a land dispute concerning three kathas of land sold to them. They contended that the extortion allegation was false and that the case was filed to …
Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case involving the 15‑year‑old daughter of an informant. The petitioner claimed the girl left home voluntarily out of love and travelled with him, arguing that this negated any kidnapping allegation. The State, through the Additional Public …
Mohan Paswan was arrested on 8 December 2025 in connection with FIR No. 163 of 2024 alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 379, 307 and 34, including assault with a desi katta causing head injury. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, asserted that the FIR was false and …
The petitioner, Md. Israfil, was arrested for possession of 19.2 litres of triprolidine hydrochloride and codeine phosphate syrup, alleged to be more than a 'small quantity' under the NDPS Act, and charged under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and NDPS sections 20 and 22. An earlier bail application was …
The petitioners, Somendra and Nagendra Kamat, applied for pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault, unlawful assembly, and robbery during a Durga Puja event. Their earlier anticipatory bail application had been rejected …
Vikash Kumar Yadav was charged under IPC sections 304B, 201 and 34 for the alleged dowry‑related murder of his wife. He had been in custody since 2 August 2023 and his repeated bail applications were rejected. The trial court had framed charges on 4 February 2026 and examined one witness, while …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Sharma, an accused in a 2009 complaint case under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking modification of a surrender order dated 16 June 2025. Earlier, a modification had extended the surrender period by three weeks, but the …
The petitioner, Amrit Raj, was arrested on 16 February 2026 in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 307, 34 and Arms Act section 27. The FIR specifically attributes the act of firing that injured an informant to co‑accused Amit Kumar Choudhary, while the petitioner is …
The petitioner, Md. Tauhid, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (C.A. No.2650/2019) for alleged offences under IPC sections 498A and 34. He contended that the allegations of dowry demand and cruelty were false, arising from matrimonial discord, and asserted his innocence, lack …
Manu Singh and co‑accused were charged under IPC sections 323, 341, 307, 504 and 506/34 for allegedly assaulting an informant with lathi‑danda and iron rods. The petitioner had been in custody since 10 October 2025 and his earlier bail plea was rejected, with liberty to re‑apply after …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 498A and 379, together with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He alleged marital discord with his wife (OP No.2), claimed false implication of his …
The petitioner, Shalu Kumar, was in custody for a murder case (Case No. 132 of 2021) involving offences under IPC sections 302, 34, 120(B) and Arms Act section 27, based on an FIR lodged by informant Prabha Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and four others shot the informant's son, …
The Patna High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by two petitioners, Binod Kumar and Sunny Kumar, who were alleged to be part of an organized gang involved in extortion of real‑estate builders. The allegations arose from a separate FIR (Case No.129 of 2025) and a later FIR that …
The appellants, Satyendra Bind and Ravi Bind, were charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault on 19‑04‑2025. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge. The appellants contended …
The Patna High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by two petitioners, Binod Kumar and Sunny Kumar, who were alleged to be part of an organized gang involved in extortion of real‑estate builders. The allegations arose from a separate FIR (Case No.129 of 2025) and a later FIR that …
The appellant, Bhai Ram Paswan, was charged with murder, conspiracy, and offences under the SC/ST Act and Arms Act. He has been in custody since April 2024 and has repeatedly applied for regular bail, the third attempt being before this Court. The trial is underway with eight of fourteen prosecution …
The petitioner, Md. Qayum Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under IPC sections 379 and 411 and several provisions of the Bihar Minerals (Concession Prevention of illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules for alleged illegal mining and storage of sand and stone chips. …
The petitioners, who are the parents‑in‑law and a sister‑in‑law of the complainant, were taken into cognizance by a Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act based on a FIR alleging dowry demand and cruelty. The petitioners filed an application …
The wife (OP No.2) filed a complaint alleging dowry demand for a Bolero vehicle, cruelty, assault and attempted poisoning by her husband and his family. The Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate took cognizance under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against the husband and …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, challenged the order of cognizance dated 16‑07‑2018 taken by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, under Section 498‑A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The FIR was filed by his wife shortly after he filed a divorce petition, alleging …
The appellant, Prashant Poddar, was charged with murder, conspiracy, and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement emerged from a confessional statement of co-accused Bhaskar Jha, who had earlier been granted …
The petitioner, Prakash Chandra Dheeraj, sought to quash the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 120B IPC arising from alleged falsification of postal delivery records. The FIR alleged that the petitioner updated the computer …
Santosh Paswan, who is in custody for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, applied for bail. The trial court had informed the High Court that it would deliver its judgment in May 2026. The High Court noted this undertaking and held that the bail …
The petitioners—Nikhil Kumar Chaurasiya, Guddu Chauraisa and Javed Mian—applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, alleging they were falsely implicated in a stabbing incident. They argued that the police investigation concluded with a final …
The petitioner, Manoj Panda, was in judicial custody for alleged offences under Sections 304B, 341, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a dowry‑death murder case. His earlier bail application had been rejected, but he argued that he had been detained since February 2024, had no prior …
The petitioner, Md. Jahid @ Afroj, was charged in Bhagwanpur Police Station Case No. 07 of 2024 for offences under Sections 328, 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, relating to attempt to murder, murder and criminal conspiracy. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court. The …
Shubham Chaudhary was arrested in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that his name was absent from the FIR and that the informant and another witness identified other accused as the shooters. The …
The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Sanand Taluka, challenged the laying of a 66 kV transmission line by the state transmission utility, alleging that the route was arbitrary, caused undue hardship and violated the Electricity Act, 2003 and the Telegraph Act, 1885. They sought a mandamus …
The petitioner was preventively detained on 15.04.2026 by the Surat Police Commissioner as a "sexual offender" under Section 2(ha) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The petitioner challenged the detention, arguing that the alleged offences relate only to law and order …
Manaini Devi, the mother‑in‑law of the deceased, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑death case (Sections 304B and 34 IPC) concerning the death of her daughter‑in‑law, who was found near a well. The petitioner argued that she has a clean record, the informant is not an …
Manish Kumar appealed against the order of a Special Judge that denied him anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, firing of weapons, and offences under the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that a group of accused, …
The petitioner, Md. Zakir Hussain, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code alleging misappropriation of Rs.7,500 received under the Swachh Bharat Mission for constructing a laboratory. He claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that the …
Prem Sahni, also known as Gopal Chaudhry, applied for bail while in custody since 12 February 2025 in connection with a 2004 murder case (Sections 302, 307, 34 IPC) and several offences under the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that he, along with co‑accused, fired on an informant’s brother, causing his …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in Supaul P.S. Case No. 829 of 2022 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354D, 506, and 34 IPC, alleging that on 26.08.2022 they intercepted the informant, tried to pull her into a car, and dragged her by the neck. The petitioners claimed innocence, …
The petitioners, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 433 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 380, 354, 354A, 406, 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint alleged that the petitioners …
Vikash Kumar (alias Vikash Yadav) was arrested on 14 July 2025 in connection with a 2023 FIR alleging multiple offences including rioting, assault, grievous hurt, attempted murder and illegal possession of arms. The informant claimed that Kumar and others attacked his father, severed both forearms …
Ashok Yadav was arrested on 30 October 2025 in connection with a case arising from a land dispute that led to the death of Vijay Sahni. The FIR, dated 4 May 2022, initially alleged offences under Sections 363 and 365 of the IPC, but the police charge‑sheeted him under Sections 302 (murder), 201 …
The petitioner, Parmanand Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case arising from a land dispute where he was alleged to have entered an informant's house armed and assaulted family members. The petitioner claimed innocence and that the matter was purely civil, seeking an amicable settlement. The …
Mala Devi applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint case (No. 347/2022) alleging that she dishonoured a cheque of Rs 7 lakhs, invoking Sections 406, 420 IPC and Section 138 NI Act. The court observed that the dispute was essentially a civil one concerning a friendly loan and that the complaint …
The petitioners, Bipin Saw and Shubhag Saw, were charged with offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 427, 436 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 10 and 13 of the UAPA for allegedly using a cylinder bomb to damage a Harizan school. They have been …
The petitioners, Ramdev and Dhiraj, sought pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail in connection with PS‑Maharajganj Case No. 143 of 2020, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 341, 342, 323, 324, 307 and 435 of the IPC for assaulting an informant and setting fire to his hut. They contended that the …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kushwaha, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 35 of 2024) in Gopalganj, Bihar, where he is alleged to have shot the deceased on the head. The charges framed include murder under Section 302 IPC, criminal conspiracy under Section 120(B) IPC, common …
The petitioner, Guddu Rai, sought regular bail in a case involving illegal sand mining and a double murder, charged under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was alleged to have fired the weapon that killed two persons and has been in custody since September …
The petitioner, Raj Kishore Jha, father of the main accused Raja Ram Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 366‑A of the Indian Penal Code for alleged kidnapping. He claimed innocence, stating he was falsely implicated and has a clean antecedent, having been in custody …
The complainant, Pinki Kumari, alleged that her husband and his relatives demanded dowry and subjected her to cruelty and assault, leading to a complaint under Sections 498A, 323, 379, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under …
The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a theft case (Barh P.S. Case No. 415 of 2024) involving alleged violations of Sections 461, 379 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that rice bags were stolen from a godown and that the petitioner was implicated based on a …
The petitioner, Vikas Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 364, 302/34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting and causing the death of the deceased. He had been in custody since 24 December 2025 and applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, false implication, and that the …
The petitioner, Deepu Kumar, was charged under Section 376(G) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a minor. He has been in custody since 22 April 2023, and the trial is reportedly near completion with only a medical expert yet to be examined. The …
Molvi Arshad, aged about 75, was arrested in connection with FIR No. 343 of 2023 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 302, 120(B), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He has been in custody since 11 March 2025, has no criminal antecedents, and the charge was framed only on 4 …
The petitioners, a group of relatives, applied for bail in a case registered under PS Chausha (Falaut) Case No. 91 of 2023, alleging offences including murder, attempt to murder, assault, and illegal possession of arms. They have been in custody since August 12, 2025. Their counsel argued that only …
The petitioner, Suraj Patel, sought regular bail for offences under IPC sections 385 (dacoity), 307 (attempt to murder), 387 (attempt to commit culpable homicide), 34 (common intention) and Arms Act section 27, arising from an alleged extortion and shooting incident. The prosecution alleged that a …
Ishwar Chand Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (Section 302 IPC) alleged to be a contract killing, also charged under Sections 120(B) and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail for the second time, having been in custody since 16 June 2023. The …
The petitioners, Amar Gupta, Kanchan Devi and Rupa Gupta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 379, 504 and 506/34 for allegedly assaulting an informant and her husband, stealing jewellery and Rs.35,000. The dispute stemmed from a …
The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, was arrested in connection with the murder of a five‑year‑old girl, Ruki Kumari, whose body was discovered in a septic tank after villagers suspected him. He is charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner applied for regular bail for …
Mandeep Bharti was charged under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Jagga Ray, having made a self‑inculpatory confession. He has been in custody since 28 October 2023 and filed a second application for regular bail while the trial was underway, with two witnesses …
Tanweer Mansoori, accused of offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, filed a second application for regular bail before the Patna High Court. His earlier bail plea had been rejected on 3 April 2024. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the trial was advancing, with …
The appellants, Anil Kumar and Pappu Kumar, appealed against the order of the District and Additional Sessions Judge rejecting their anticipatory bail application in a case involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …
The petitioner, Sameer Saifi, was charged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 385, 387, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly demanding extortion from an informant and assaulting him when the demand was refused. He has been in custody since 17 April 2025 and the trial has already …
The petitioner, Diwakar Kumar, is in custody for alleged robbery of Rs. 18,39,192 from Bhagalpur Central Co-operative Bank, charged under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case is based on an FIR lodged on 4 December 2021 and CCTV footage from Farakka that purportedly …
Mukesh Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case involving offences under Sections 342, 326, 307, 302 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the real assailant was Shiv Kumar Yadav, while acknowledging a prior …
Ravi Kumar was arrested in connection with the murder of his wife, alleged to be a dowry death under IPC sections 304B, 120B and 34. He had been in custody since February 5, 2025 and filed a second application for regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated and that …
Vishal Soni was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a murder allegedly committed with hired criminals. He applied for bail for the third time, claiming he was falsely implicated and that there was no material linking him to the crime beyond …
The petitioners, Dhanayee Sah and his sons Vishal Kumar and Vivek Kumar, applied to withdraw an anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner No.1, seeking to surrender and obtain regular bail. The court allowed the withdrawal and directed that if petitioner No.1 surrenders within four weeks, …
Balram Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being named an accused in a 2017 case involving alleged assault, robbery and firing at an informant under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that the FIR, lodged six days after the …
Avdhesh Sahani petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a 2016 theft case (Section 379 IPC) involving a stolen tractor. The prosecution’s case relied on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, Majhar Mian, to implicate the …
The petitioner, Ashok Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2016 FIR that alleged his participation in a large-scale assault and looting alongside two named accused and 350‑400 unknown persons. The FIR listed numerous IPC offences, but the petitioner’s name was not originally mentioned; …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Keshri, was charged under Sections 341, 323, 379, 308, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC for assaulting an informant and his son and allegedly snatching Rs.15-20,000. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the incident arose from a sudden market altercation between two …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was implicated in a 2019 FIR alleging fraud to obtain a job, charged under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. He only became aware of the FIR in August 2025 and applied for anticipatory bail, asserting no prior criminal record and willingness to cooperate with the …
The petitioners, Lalpari Devi and Guddi Kumari, female relatives of the main accused Raj Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant. The offence alleged under IPC sections 363(a), 366(a) and 120(b) stemmed from a complaint …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Rajoun P.S. Case No. 395 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with other accused, assaulted an informant and his wife with …
The petitioner, Gopal Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a fraud case involving forged Aadhaar and PAN cards and alleged violations of IPC sections 420, 467, 471 and 34. He contended that he was merely a witness to a sale deed fraud perpetrated by another individual, …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Kumar and Sujata Kumari, were charged under IPC sections 420, 406, and 34, and later a charge-sheet added section 409. They had previously obtained regular bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC, and a prior bail application was withdrawn as infructuous. Fearing arrest, …
The petitioners, two brothers, were implicated in a sand‑mining case (Chanan PS Case No. 118 of 2023) under Sections 379 and 411 of the IPC, Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rule 56(2) of the Bihar Mining (CPIMTS) Amendment Rules, 2021. They argued that …
Santosh Kumar, the registered owner of a vehicle from which 375 ml of illicit liquor was seized, faced charges under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he had sold the vehicle to Raghav Jha, that the sale was not transferred in his name, and that he had no …
The petitioners, eight individuals named in FIR No. 76 of 2024, were charged with offences under Sections 341, 323, 308, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant with a lathi. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the FIR contains only a single head …
Avinash Kumar, director of Hopcon Infra Projects Pvt Ltd and partner of Hopcon Infra Projects Ltd, was charged under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly cheating his landlord by using forged documents to create a tenancy dispute. The petitioner contended that the …
The appellants were convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 307/34 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the informant Chhabilal Ram on a dark night, resulting in a head injury. They appealed, contending that the sole eyewitnesses were interested, the …
