Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 4601–4800
The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under sections 406, 420 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code, alleging non‑payment of rent for a truck given to him on rent. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner defaulted on the rent, constituting criminal breach of trust, …
The petitioner, Deep Prakash Gupta, was charged in a 2011 case for offences including cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and criminal conspiracy under various IPC sections. An informant from State Bank of India alleged that Gupta and co‑accused opened fraudulent Kisan Credit Card accounts …
Dr. Amarnath Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Beur P.S. Case No. 286 of 2024) filed under IPC sections 341, 323, 498-A, 494, 504 and 34 for alleged dowry harassment. Both parties appeared before the Patna High Court Mediation Centre and executed a detailed settlement agreement, …
The petitioner, Om Prakash, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and murder case (PS Case No.331 of 2024) under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner kidnapped the victim, killed him, and disposed of the body on a national highway, based on a …
The petitioners, Vikash Kumar and Muntun Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a violent incident where an informant was set ablaze, resulting in severe injuries. They argued they have clean antecedents and that the FIR does not specifically allege their participation, …
The petitioner, Govind Kumar Thakur, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in offences under Sections 420, 120(B), 468, 471, 494 and 34 of the IPC, based on a complaint by an informant who claimed Thakur had married the informant's wife Mala without a divorce and …
The petitioner, Divesh Kumar Sharma, a Railway Inspector, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have participated in a shooting that resulted in the death of Renu Devi. The police, after …
The petitioner, Haldhar Sah, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Supaul P.S. Case No. 440 of 2024) under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have killed his wife over a dowry demand. He contended that the death was accidental, claiming the deceased fell while fetching …
The petitioner, Sheikh Aliyas, a 69‑year‑old senior citizen with a clean record, was implicated in a murder case under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based on an informant’s allegation that he ordered a relative to strangle the informant’s mother‑in‑law. The petitioner contended that the informant …
The petitioner, Gajendra Mandal, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that his father assaulted the deceased. He has been in custody since 20 March 2024 and applied for bail. The State and the informant opposed …
Arvind Paswan, the Member Secretary of a teacher appointment committee, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered alleging forgery and fraud in the appointment process under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed innocence, …
Nagendra Kumar, a government teacher, was named in an FIR for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120(B) and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a shooting incident during a Holi dispute. He contended that the informant falsely implicated him and that the police investigation …
The accused were acquitted by a magistrate on charges under the IPC and Motor Vehicles Act. The complainant appealed, but the Sessions Court affirmed the acquittal. The complainant then filed a criminal revision under Section 442 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to set aside …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for Shishupal Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) in a land‑fraud case. The applicant argued that he was merely the purchaser of the land, had paid full …
The applicant, Srikant Pandey, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the order of the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Jaunpur dated 02‑11‑2020, which had rejected his discharge application in a criminal case under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the …
Ashok Kumar filed a revision petition challenging the dismissal of his Section 239 Cr.P.C discharge application in a criminal case involving alleged forgery, fraud, and conspiracy under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B. The petitioner argued that he was implicated only because he is the …
The Allahabad High Court examined a public‑interest litigation filed by Advocate Ravindra Ahlawat seeking removal of alleged encroachments by Daurala Sugar Mill on a canal road. The Court found that the petitioner had concealed his prior role as Chairman of the Cane Development Council and had …
The applicants Kishun Yadav and six others filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Negotiable Settlement Scheme (BNSS) seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 2260 of 2021 (State v. Kishan Yadav et al.) which involved offences under several IPC sections. Both parties had reconciled …
Nikhil Tiwari, the accused, filed a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 08‑12‑2025 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi, which had rejected the final report and allowed a protest petition against him in a criminal case under Sections …
The revisionist Sandeep Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Special Judge that rejected his application for release of a seized vehicle. The trial court had dismissed the application under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it was not filed by the vehicle’s …
The petitioners filed a revision against the Judicial Magistrate's order dismissing their discharge application under Section 245(2) of the Cr.P.C. The High Court noted that revision jurisdiction is concurrent with the Sessions Court but ordinarily requires the litigant to approach the Sessions …
The applicant, Gaurav Kumar Gupta, challenged a summoning order dated 27‑01‑2025 that named him as an accused under Sections 406, 504 and 506 IPC in a complaint filed by a business associate over an alleged unpaid debt of Rs 4,17,030. The applicant argued that the complaint lacked the essential …
The applicant, Mohd Asif, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to amend the prayer clause of his earlier application because the cognizance order dated 06‑06‑2025 was inadvertently omitted. He prayed to quash both the chargesheet dated 01‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order, …
The appellants challenged the summoning order dated 19‑07‑2025 and the Special Sessions Trial proceedings, alleging that the FIR initially described a simple assault and later was altered to include caste‑based allegations without any supporting evidence. They argued that the informant’s statements …
The petitioner claimed that an oral agreement to sell a house, for which he paid Rs. 6 lakh, was breached by the respondents who neither executed the sale deed nor returned the money. He filed a complaint under Section 175(3) of the BNSS, which the magistrate dismissed as a civil matter, and …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 10‑07‑2019 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 406 IPC. The complaint alleged that the applicants had misappropriated money given by the complainant for …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Charge Sheet No. 751 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the matter had been compromised between the parties. The State’s A.G. did not …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS filed by Nitin Choudhary, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 379, 34, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, citing two earlier police closure reports and contradictory forensic …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 20‑07‑2018 issued by Judicial Magistrate‑I, Gorakhpur, and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 1050 of 2017) for offences under Sections 323, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. The dispute arose from …
The appellants Rishipal and Ram Bharosey filed a criminal appeal (No. 520 of 1986) against a judgment dated 30 January 1986 passed by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Budaun, under IPC Sections 324, 323 and 34. The appeal was pending for many years when a report dated 24 April 2026 indicated that …
Krishna Pal and Mahendra Pal were convicted by a Sessions Court for offences under IPC sections 323 and 324 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and a fine. They appealed under Section 374 CrPC, contending that the trial court failed to consider the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 and Section 360 …
The applicants Salman Khan, Gulshan Khan, Irfan Khan and Nikhat Khan filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons in a criminal case alleging dowry harassment, cruelty and assault under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shuaib, who was arrested in connection with a murder‑related case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7462 of 2025) under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the only allegation against …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ajeet Singh, who is accused under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his uncle. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing lack of eyewitnesses and alleging that the recovered weapon was found three hours after the incident, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 307, alleging that the parties had reached an amicable compromise verified by the magistrate. Both sides admitted the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Rajat, who is charged under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 333 and 140(3) BNS for the death of his sister‑in‑law. The applicant claimed the incident was an accident that occurred during a family dispute, asserting that he …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sushil Kumar and Vishnu (Vinay) in a murder case (Sections 302 and 201 IPC) where the deceased was reported missing in July 2023 and a skeleton was recovered in May 2024. The DNA report presented by the A.G. showed a partial profile …
The applicants Lakhan Singh and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 131, 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The parties had amicably settled the …
The applicants, including Shabab, were charged in a criminal case under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 313 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a complaint by the wife of Shabab. After investigation and framing of charges, the parties reached an out‑of‑court settlement on …
Puneet @ Nanne, accused of double murder under IPC sections 452, 307, 302 and 325, had been in custody since October 2022. His first bail plea was rejected, but he filed a second application arguing lack of criminal history, that only five of eighteen prosecution witnesses had been examined, and …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4887 of 2019) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 307, 328 and 354 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise dated 16 October 2021, which was verified by the trial …
The applicant, Jainuddin, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Criminal Case No. 287 of 2021) under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that the deceased was last seen with the applicant, and blood‑stained clothing and a weapon recovered from the scene …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahendra, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 307 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 352, 351(3), 338, 318(4) and 336(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel argued that the FIR was essentially a civil dispute, that …
The appellants Vimal Kumar and Ramsajivan appealed against an order of the Special Judge granting anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 304 and 328 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellants sought to set aside the order and also requested …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 20 of 2020 (Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC) on the ground that they had entered into a fresh compromise deed dated 9 April 2026, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial …
The appellant was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly assaulting and abusing a Scheduled Caste woman in an agricultural field at night. The appellant contended that the "public view" element required by Section …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 13781 of 2025) arising from a charge sheet under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120B of the IPC. The parties had reached a compromise on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4999 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 325, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise on 28 January 2026, and the trial court …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Rajveer and seven others seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4280 of 2025) relating to offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325, 352, 504 and 506. The applicants asserted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Ayub, who is charged under Sections 74, 64(1), 351(3), 103(1) BNS of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Income Tax Act in Crime No. 76 of 2025. The applicant claimed that his wife died accidentally in the bathroom and denied any …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and related orders dated January‑February 2007 in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 195, 211, 218, 220, 323, 343 and 120B of the IPC. They asserted that the dispute with the State and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 511 of 2021) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise on 21 August 2025, which was verified by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10641 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties claimed they had settled the dispute out of court and the opposite party was ready to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 4735 of 2018) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Azamgarh, which arose from FIR 0054 of 2018 alleging offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 354B of the IPC. The …
Naika Hansda was arrested in connection with a 2003 terrorist attack in Khaira, Jamui, where a large group of extremists murdered three persons, looted property and used dynamite. The FIR, despite a procedural defect, named the petitioner as an identified participant, and he has been in custody …
Manoj Kumar was arrested in connection with the recovery of 1,206 litres of illicit liquor from his truck and charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise & Prohibition Act. He contended that no incriminating material was found in his conscious …
Umesh Kumar was arrested in connection with alleged dacoity and related offences under IPC sections 399, 402, 413 and 414, and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35. He has been in custody since 4‑December‑2025, but no weapon was recovered from his possession; the case against him rests mainly on a …
The petitioner, Azad Ansari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 498(A), 385, 376, 354(C), 354(D), 34 of the IPC, Section 3 of the D.P. Act and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the IT Act. He claimed the underlying dispute was matrimonial, now resolved …
Mukesh Pandit filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of a series of orders issued by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, which included a bailable warrant, a non‑bailable warrant, proclamation under Section 82 and attachment under Section 83, ultimately …
Anant Kumar Ram, a worker at a home for mentally and physically disabled children, was charged under Sections 120B, 201, 323, 342, 377 of the IPC, Sections 6, 9, 10 and 17 of the POCSO Act and Sections 75, 82 and 85 of the Juvenile Justice Act for alleged abuse and failure to forward complaints of …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 354, 307, 427, 337, 379, 34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the chest of Pankaj Kumar. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the injury was …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Singh, was charged in Buxar (I) P.S. Case No. 14 of 2019 with offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504, 506 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired on a victim causing injuries. He had been in custody since 27 March 2024 and claimed innocence, …
The petitioner, Md. Amzad Khan, sought regular bail for a case registered under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the alleged killing of a truck driver and looting of the truck. This was his third attempt for bail after two earlier applications were rejected. The prosecution’s …
The petitioner, Harsh Raj, a Mathematics (Hons.) student, was arrested on 19‑08‑2025 in connection with a case registered under multiple IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506) and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging assault. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, while the …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for a serious offence. He had been in custody since 30‑04‑2024 and his earlier bail application was rejected with a direction that he could re‑apply if the trial was not concluded within a year. …
Manjay Sahni was charged under IPC sections 395, 412 and 120(B) in Sessions Trial No. 156 of 2024. He had earlier applied for regular bail twice, both of which were rejected, but the court allowed him to renew the application after the charge was framed. In the present application, the petitioner …
Satya Narayan Sahni was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 341, 323, 307, 447, 448, 504, 506, 34 and later 302) and section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired on a victim who died after eleven months. He had been in custody …
Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302, 120B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of a deceased person. He had been in custody since 22 September 2025, but the prosecution could not produce any material linking him to the offence. The …
Ranveer Paswan was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Alauli Case No.105 of 2024) under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He has been in custody since 10 June 2025 and the co‑accused’s self‑inculpatory statement implicates him in the killing. The petitioner applied for …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was not named in the FIR or in the victim's statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., and that the …
Petitioner Rajesh Yadav, charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a fatal shooting, has been in custody for over three years. He filed a regular bail application, seeking correction of a typographical error, after two earlier bail pleas were …
The petitioner, Sachit Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging kidnapping with intent to marry. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the victim’s statement, recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, was made under parental …
The petitioner, Gulam Ansari, was arrested in March 2023 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 304B and 34 IPC) alleging that he, along with others, tortured and allegedly raped the informant’s daughter leading to her death. He contends that he is the devar of the deceased, has been …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought bail in a session trial (No. 187 of 2026) for alleged offences under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case relied on the dying declaration of an informant who was allegedly abducted, assaulted and later died, naming twelve …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioner, Rajan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the release of his truck (Reg. No. HP38H-0768) that had been seized under IPC sections 272/273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (sections 30(a) and 41(i)). The truck was seized in a police case and remained in …
The petitioner, Mohan Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder‑conspiracy case (Gamhariya P.S. Case No. 44 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the IPC. He claimed innocence, asserting that the allegations against him were general, omnibus and …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners, four brothers from Ganga Pipra village, sought bail fearing arrest in a 2018 case (P.S. No. 175) that alleged assault, attempted murder and other offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the IPC. They claimed the charges were fabricated due to a land dispute and …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The appellants, who were selected as Panchayat/Prakhand Teachers under the 2006‑2008 recruitment rules, were later appointed by the District Appellate Authority after vacancies arose post‑2012, but were denied salaries. The State Appellate Authority set aside those appointments and ordered …
Chandan Singh applied for bail after being implicated in a case of alleged poisoning of his wife, registered under IPC Section 103(1) read with Section 3(5). The prosecution alleged that Singh and co‑accused had long‑standing quarrels with the deceased and demanded a dowry of three lakh rupees, …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
Umesh Sahani was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 290 litres of liquor and 8,000 litres of raw material from a kiln near a river, offences punishable under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 109(1) read with Section 3(5) of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, while intoxicated, assaulted the husband and son of the informant with a khanti, rod and …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners, Shankar Paswan and Mithun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 395 of 2022, which involves offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners participated in an assault on an …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case (IPC §§ 420, 406) filed by Nirmala Pandey. The prosecution alleged that Kumar, as Director of "AGRANI", defrauded the complainant of Rs. 10.15 lakh out of a total payment …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
Petitioner Rajesh Rai, accused under several IPC sections (272, 273, 420, 467, 468, 120(b)) and sections of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, applied for bail. He has ten prior cases, one involving alleged recovery of 1,845 litres of liquor, but was not arrested at the scene and no seized …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
Gautam Kumar and Pappu Kumar Kewat sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple IPC offences and Section 45 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from Karu Chaudhary's house. They asserted they have clean antecedents, were not …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the 2006 and 2008 recruitment rules, placed on merit lists but not initially appointed; after vacancies arose they obtained appointments through the District Appellate Authority but were denied salaries. They filed writ …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who, after being placed on merit lists, were not appointed initially but later obtained appointments through District Appellate Authorities in 2016‑17. They were …
The appellant, Md Saif Shahid, was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged caste‑based abuse, demolition of a boundary wall, and extortion in a land dispute. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the …
The appellant, Md. Saiyad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Araria, for dowry death under IPC Section 304B/34 and for causing disappearance of evidence under Section 201/34, receiving life imprisonment and a five‑year term. The prosecution relied on the statements of ten witnesses and …
The appellant, Md. Khurshid, was convicted by a Special POCSO Court for raping an eight‑year‑old girl, being sentenced to life imprisonment under IPC 376(i) and to rigorous imprisonment for offences under POCSO Sections 4, 8 and 12. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence – the victim’s …
Mukesh Kumar was charged under IPC sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) and section 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly raping a student after threatening to circulate an objectionable video. He has been in custody since September 18, 2023, and his earlier bail plea was rejected. He …
The appellants Munna Yadav and Dilip Yadav were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Jageshwar Yadav under IPC sections 302 and 34, based primarily on the testimony of the deceased’s wife (PW‑7) and her son (PW‑4), who were alleged eye‑witnesses, and on medical evidence suggesting …
Shashi Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for bail after a complaint (No. 1203 of 2023) was lodged against him under IPC section 498A read with sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court noted a conciliatory meeting between the petitioner and his wife, during which they agreed to …
The petitioner, Shantanu Singh, was accused of fraudulently withdrawing large sums from a dormant bank account, with allegations involving Sections 419, 420, 467 and 471 of the IPC. He contended that he has a clean record and was falsely implicated, pointing out discrepancies in the name on the …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in 2026 for offences alleged in a 2004 complaint (IPC sections 323, 498A, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act section 3/4). The court questioned why bail was applied for after a twenty‑year gap since the complaint and alleged cognizance. Counsel misrepresented that …
Karelal Koda was arrested in connection with a Naxalite incident where a large group allegedly fired on police. The FIR named 45 persons, including Koda, under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, the Arms Act section 27 and several Uttar Pradesh Act provisions. Koda filed a second petition for …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, is in custody for alleged murder under Sections 302, 34 and 120B of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, stemming from an FIR filed on 26.05.2023. The FIR alleges that he, along with others, opened fire on a moving vehicle, killing the victim. A report dated …
The petitioner, Md. Sarfaraz, was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple IPC offences (including sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 341, 323, 504, 354, 307, 379 and 506) and had been in custody for nearly four years. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Sections 483 and 484 …
The appellant, Shivsankar Pal, was charged with offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a disputed land sale in which the informant alleged fraud and caste-based assault. The appellant contended that the matter was essentially …
The applicants were charged under IPC sections 307, 201, 114 and Arms Act sections 3 and 25(1)(B)(A) for firing weapons in the air during a marriage procession. They filed a discharge application under Section 227 of the CrPC, contending that the alleged attempt to murder (Section 307) was not …
Arvind @ Shila Dangi @ Kanji Machi (Tandel) applied for regular bail after a charge sheet was filed in a case involving forgery, land grabbing and related offences under the IPC and Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act. He had been in custody since May 2022 and cited health issues and the fact …
The appellant, Amul Anand, appealed against the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge rejecting his bail application in a case registered under Sections 376 and 493 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant claimed …
The appellant, Deepu Kumar, was charged under several IPC provisions and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting, caste‑abhorrently abusing, and robbing the informant on 22 July 2025. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. On …
The appellant, Abhijeet Paswan, appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting his bail application in a case involving murder and related offences under the IPC, Arms Act and SC/ST (POA) Act. He had been in custody since October 2025 and claimed innocence, asserting that he only helped …
Dilip Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code in a 2016 case. He applied for regular bail for the third time after earlier rejections by this Court and the Supreme Court. The trial had examined all prosecution witnesses except the investigating officer and …
The appellants, Munna Singh and Abhijeet Prakash, appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant regular bail in a case involving murder, attempted murder, and conspiracy under multiple IPC …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged murder. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, has been in custody since 22‑08‑2025, and that the FIR specifically implicates another person, Bablu Sahni, for …
The petitioner, Dilip Sahani, was arrested in 2018 for alleged participation in a gathering where explosives were found, leading to charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 414 and Explosive Substances Act sections 4 and 5. He has nine prior criminal cases, including a conviction for a serious …
The petitioner, Manoj Yadav, sought regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault with a sword and other violent acts arising from a land dispute. He had been in judicial custody since 28 November 2025 and claimed he was falsely implicated …
The petitioners, Bali Paswan, Shadhu Paswan and Chhotelal Paswan, were implicated in a 2017 case alleging assault with intent to kill under multiple IPC sections. They claimed innocence, stating the dispute arose from a land conflict resulting in a case and counter‑case, with injuries not to vital …
Ram Lakhan Prasad was arrested in connection with a 2017 case involving murder (IPC s.302) and related offences (IPC s.201, s.34). He applied for regular bail, asserting that he was falsely implicated and that his name appeared only in the confessional statement of co-accused Ajit Kumar, claiming …
The petitioner, Kunti Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR alleging assault and theft of a gold chain, invoking sections 341, 323, 307, 354B, 379, 504 and 34 of the IPC. She contended that the FIR contained only a vague, omnibus accusation and that she had no specific overt act …
The appellant Raju Sah was arrested in connection with the murder of Ashrafi Kumar alias Raju Kumar, a Dalit, based primarily on the confession of a co-accused. The FIR did not name the appellant and no material was recovered linking him to the crime, nor did any family member identify him. The …
Rinku Devi appealed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge who had rejected her anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act. She sought pre‑arrest bail, but the respondent argued that …
The petitioner, Rupdev Sahani, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 324, 328, 304-B and 34 of the IPC alleging that he, along with co‑accused, demanded dowry and caused the death of the informant's sister by burning her. The petitioner claimed he was a distant relative and …
Chhathiya Devi, a resident of East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging she and co‑accused assaulted the informant's son, causing his death. The petitioner claimed innocence and alleged false …
The petitioner, Bibhishan Rajak, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of an informant's mother during a field‑irrigation dispute. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with others, …
The appellants, six Yadavs, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged assault, caste abuse, robbery and threats that occurred on 27 October 2023. The trial court rejected their anticipatory bail application. In appeal, the appellants argued …
The petitioner, Rajesh Das, was arrested in connection with a 2016 incident where a group attacked a railway bridge construction site and stole Rs 50,000, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the U.A.P. Act and the C.L.A. Act. The prosecution’s informant, a railway …
The appellants Munarik Yadav, Guddu Kumar and Awadhesh Yadav were accused of assaulting a woman and abusing her with caste-based slurs on 16 May 2024, an FIR being lodged four months later. The Special Judge had rejected their anticipatory bail application under Sections 341, 323, 354, 504, 506, 34 …
The petitioner, Shankar Mandal, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of FIR No. 169 of 2017 registered under IPC sections 467, 468, 471, 406, 420 and 120B. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be disposed of, granting him liberty to raise any objections to …
The petitioners, Shankar Mandal and Hari Lal Mandal, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quashment of FIR No. 169 of 2017 registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 406, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. They argued that the FIR was improper and requested that the court …
Anand Kumar was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing a caste name and assaulting an informant at a car showroom. The informant claimed the abuse occurred when he inquired about a car, while the appellant …
Manish Kumar was facing arrest in a case where an FIR alleged his involvement in a fraudulent money transfer, charging him under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, the FIR was filed more than three months after the alleged incident without any explanation, and …
The petitioners, Deep Narayan Yadav and Bhim Kumar, were named in an FIR for assault, outraging modesty, and theft under several IPC sections. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations were false, the incident was a free‑fight, and they have clean antecedents. The State …
Chandan Manjhi applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 304B, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the dowry‑death of his sister‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was subjected to cruelty …
The petitioner, Md. Rahamtullah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 360 litres of liquor from four motorcycles. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, …
Pinki Kumari, the wife of Krishna Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 30.48 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in her name. She argued that she had no knowledge of the vehicle's misuse, had no liquor in her possession, and …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was arrested on 14‑12‑2025 in connection with a 2022 case involving alleged robbery, dacoity and illegal possession of firearms under Sections 399, 402, 400, 401, 34 of the IPC and Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on …
The petitioner, Madaran Mian, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 457, 380, 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged looting of an informant's house. He contended that the FIR originally named unknown miscreants and his name only appeared later in the case diary, with no …
Chhoti Kumari was implicated in a case involving the recovery of 20 litres of country-made liquor and charged under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She contended that the liquor was not found in her possession and that the case against her rested solely on the …
Bullet Singh was arrested in connection with a dacoity case (PS Kuchaikote Case No. 87 of 2023) and charged under IPC sections 399, 402, 412 and 34, and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the confessional statements of co‑accused Sunit Kumar and Irshad …
The petitioner Alok Kumar was charged under Section 498A IPC based on a complaint by his wife alleging dowry demand and cruelty. The trial court, after a Section 202 inquiry, took cognizance and issued summons. The petitioner filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking quashal, arguing that the …
The appellant, Roffy Singh, was convicted in a lower court for alleged gang rape under Sections 376(d), 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(ii) and 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (POA) Act. He filed a bail application which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge‑SC/ST (POA) Act, Gaya. The …
The petitioners, Brajesh Kumar and Priyanshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case alleging fraud and misappropriation of Rs. 8 lakh under IPC Sections 406, 420 and 409. They claimed innocence, stating they acted on orders of the bank manager and had already repaid half the alleged …
The petitioner, Yashin Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a May 15, 2012 order of the Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 498(A) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging dowry harassment and assault under IPC Sections 498A and 323. Mediation efforts had failed, and the prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded dowry and subjected his wife to cruelty. The petitioner denied the …
The appellant, Subhankar Kumar, a driver, was implicated in a case filed under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, based on a dispute over a Rs.4.10 lakh loan allegedly taken by the accused. The informant claimed caste-based abuse …
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar, was charged under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dacoity in a residential house. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating articles were found on him, and that he has ten prior criminal antecedents for which he is …
The prosecution alleged that the applicant, Shafi Ibrahim Memon, supplied 50 grams of mephedrone to a co-accused who was later found in possession of the drug. The co-accused (Accused No.1) had been acquitted by the Trial Court and no record was produced showing any transaction between the applicant …
The appellant Kamta Singh was convicted by a Sessions Court for assaulting Sukhdev Singh, resulting in injuries that could have led to culpable homicide, under Section 308 IPC and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence, including eyewitness …
The appellants, tenants in a rent dispute, fired at their landlord, Jagdish Narayan, causing only superficial abrasions. The trial court convicted them under Section 307 IPC for attempted murder and sentenced them to three years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court examined the …
The appellants were convicted by a Sessions Court under Section 394 IPC for voluntarily causing hurt while committing robbery and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence, noting that no eyewitness or medical testimony directly linked the …
The police, acting on a tip, apprehended Ram Das and his companions while they were preparing to commit dacoity and recovered country‑made pistols. He was charged under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, convicted and sentenced to seven years' …
The petitioners Yash Pandey and others, who are accused in Complaint Case No.6433 of 2023 (Shivam Pandey v. Yash Pandey), filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 352, 504 and 506 IPC. The complaint alleged that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 05.10.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 17.10.2025, and the entire criminal proceedings of Session Trial No.805 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 74 …
The applicants, Vinod Kumar Gupta and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Criminal Case No.569 of 2016, which arose from a 2015 offence under Sections 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed that they had reconciled …
The applicant Yogendra Singh filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 289 of 2023) arising from an FIR lodged on 24-10-2022 alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust in relation to a tractor rented in 2011. The charge sheet under Section 406 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2009 of 2020) arising from offences under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a voluntary compromise, which was verified by the Chief Judicial …
