Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 4801–5000
The applicant, Kushvendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an interim maintenance order of Rs.7,500 per month granted by the Meerut Family Court in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. case. He alleged that the opposite party, his alleged wife, had fabricated a marriage …
Petitioner Rajesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint case (No. 1320 of 2023) that alleged his participation in assault, threats, and theft under multiple IPC sections and the Daain Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, attacked the …
The petitioner, Suresh Prasad, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated based on a complaint that he obtained a teaching appointment using forged documents. He asserted a clean …
The petitioner, Bittu Sharma, was implicated in a case registered under IPC sections 363, 365 and 34 for allegedly luring a 17‑year‑old girl and failing to return her. The petitioner claimed innocence, highlighting a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and asserting that the girl voluntarily accompanied …
Petitioner Md. Mukhtar Ansari applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 142/2024) alleging rape of a 13‑year‑old girl and other offences under IPC sections 376, 323, 342, 504, 506, 34 and POCSO Act section 4. The prosecution claims the petitioner raped the informant’s minor …
The petitioner, Seikh Sahadat Hussain, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 376, 341, 323, 313, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleges that he forced a woman to have sexual …
Jagar Nath Rai was accused in Bheldi Police Station Case No. 205 of 2025 for assaulting an informant and her son, causing simple head injuries, under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that the injuries were minor, seeking pre‑arrest bail. The …
The petitioner, Birendra Prasad Singh, aged about 72, was charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 302 and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly assaulting the son of an informant, leading to the victim's death. He had earlier applied for regular bail which was rejected, but after charge …
Sonu Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery and shooting incident where a motorcycle was snatched at gunpoint, resulting in injury to the owner. He is charged under IPC Sections 393 (dacoity) and 307 (attempt to murder) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner, a 20‑year‑old with a …
The petitioner, Viccky Singh, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 307, 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petition was his fourth attempt to obtain bail. The learned counsel informed the court that the trial had already concluded and the …
The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a triple murder case (PS Case No. 1234 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, marking his third attempt after earlier bail …
The petitioner, Sapat Kumar, feared arrest in a case (Muffasil Motihari P.S. Case No.34 of 2021) involving alleged mob violence and multiple offences under the IPC and the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The FIR described a raid on a suspect’s house that escalated into a clash with 40‑50 …
The petitioners, members of the Ray family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 324 of 2025 alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that the accused, armed, attacked him, with Pintu Kumar accused of inflicting a grievous …
The petitioner, Anarjit Kumar, was implicated in a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC filed by his wife, Lalmuni Kumari. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, asserting his innocence and a clean criminal record. The petitioner …
Puja Jha applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving murder, conspiracy and illegal arms offences (IPC ss.302, 201, 120(B), 34 and Arms Act s.27) arising from a 2012 FIR. Earlier anticipatory bail applications were rejected in 2014 and again in December 2025. The petitioner argued there was no …
The petitioner, Santu Kumar, was implicated in a violent incident at a sand mine that resulted in deaths and injuries, leading to charges under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement of a …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Bela P.S. Case No. 113 of 2020) alleging kidnapping of a minor under IPC sections 365, 366, 366A and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, abducted the informant’s …
The petitioners, nine accused persons, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Chandauti P.S. Case No. 251 of 2023) involving offences under several IPC sections including assault, robbery and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleged that the accused, armed and intoxicated, …
The appellant, Sitaram Mahto, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting a child and using caste-based slurs. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act, arguing that he has a clean record, the FIR was filed …
The petitioner, Kunal Singh, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 307, 326, 120(B), 302/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a shooting that resulted in death. The FIR does not name the petitioner as an eye‑witness; his alleged involvement is …
The petitioners, Sata Yadav and Sonu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Rajoun PS Case No. 291 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 307, 341, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. They claimed they were falsely implicated due to a land dispute and asserted no criminal …
The petitioner, Aditya Raj, was implicated in a recruitment fraud case (Airport P.S. Case No.28 of 2019) alleging forgery and cheating under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471, based on a mismatch between his thumb impression and the original sample. He claimed innocence, stating that a …
The petitioners, Ram Prakash Pandey and Satya Prakash Pandey, feared arrest in connection with Complaint No.6397 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They filed a quashing application (Cr. Misc. No.19860 of 2025) and …
Mahesh Rai and Vipin Kumar sought protection from arrest in a criminal case (Sonepur P.S. Case No. 828 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant and his brothers under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. They claimed innocence and expressed a desire to settle the dispute …
The petitioners, seven residents of Bakarchak village, applied for bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 147, 341, 323, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly demanding extortion of Rs.20‑25 thousand and assaulting an informant and his brother. They …
The petitioner, Wasim Ahmad, was charged under IPC sections 420, 504 and 506 for allegedly cheating Ranjeet Kumar of Rs 5 lakh in a purported vehicle purchase. The informant claimed he paid Rs 2.5 lakh each, but the vehicle was never delivered and the money was not returned. The petitioner denied …
The petitioner, Anirudh Mali, was accused under several IPC sections for assaulting the husband of his sister‑in‑law and allegedly taking Rs.5,000. He claimed innocence, stating the incident stemmed from a land dispute and was a simple fight with no specific overt act alleged against him. The …
The petitioners, three residents of Mahishi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning alleged theft of temple offerings. They claimed the allegations were false, stemming from a dispute with the informant who was the …
The petitioner, a resident of West Bengal, claimed ownership of a vehicle that had been stolen and later used to transport liquor, leading to its seizure under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The theft was recorded under IPC section 379, and a separate case was filed for the liquor offence. …
The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, was arrested on 22 January 2026 in connection with a case involving the seizure of 9 litres of illicit Mahua liquor from a motorcycle, alleged to be in violation of IPC sections 274 and 275 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. He contended that he had no …
The High Court considered a petition by Ajay Kumar Choubey, a faculty member, seeking anticipatory bail in a case alleging financial embezzlement by the in‑charge principal Sanjay Kumar Rai involving Rs 70 lakhs of college funds. The prosecution alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 409 and …
Kamal Hussain was arrested in connection with the seizure of 16,000 litres of raw spirit and charged under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 sections 30(a), 41 and 47. He contended that he was falsely implicated, his name having been added to the FIR solely on …
The petitioner, Ratnesh Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered as Hajipur Sadar Police Station Case No. 395 of 2024, alleging theft under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had committed theft and that stolen articles, including …
Sudesh Kumar was arrested on 22 March 2024 in connection with a case of oil theft from an Indian Oil Corporation pipeline, charged under multiple IPC sections, the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline Act, the Explosive Substance Act, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, the Property Act and …
The petitioner, Bablu Patel, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where a nurse alleged that he caught her, attempted to outrage her modesty and tore her clothes, constituting offences under Sections 354(b) and 323 of the IPC. The petitioner claimed he had been granted the privilege of Section …
The petitioner, Md. Asfak, was arrested on 9 September 2024 in connection with a 2022 case involving alleged attempts to murder, assault, and illegal possession of arms. The prosecution's case relied primarily on statements made by co-accused individuals who were apprehended at the scene, with no …
Golu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under IPC sections 457 (rioting) and 380 (theft) and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26, alleging his involvement in a robbery where a pistol and cartridges were recovered. The prosecution’s case relied on the confessional statement of an …
The petitioners, Raj Kishor Ray and Bablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 324, 307 and 34, arising from a land dispute with the informant. The prosecution claimed the petitioners entered the informant’s courtyard, assaulted persons with …
The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302 and 120B IPC, Section 27 Arms Act) and has been in custody since 23 December 2025. He contended that he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR does not specifically allege his participation, asserting that he …
The petitioner, Sunil Mehta, was arrested for allegedly cutting three trees from their roots on government land, an act alleged to constitute offences under Sections 379, 411, 427 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Forest (Conservation) Act. He contended that the trees were planted …
The petitioners, seven members of the Paswan family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Hajipur Sadar PS Case No. 67 of 2026) involving alleged offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on a police raid …
Shiv Kumar @ Tuntun Yadav was arrested in connection with a June 2023 incident in which he allegedly assaulted his brother and other persons, leading to charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner filed a bail application, claiming innocence and alleging that the FIR was …
The petitioners, three women, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 143, 447, 341, 323, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code relating to an alleged assault on 17 May 2022. Their counsel argued that they have clean antecedents, are falsely implicated, and that the FIR …
The petitioners, Tuntun Sah and Jamdar Sah, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 46 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 307 and 302 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that a dispute over a parked motorcycle led to an assault on the …
The case arose from an alleged acid attack on two sisters, Soni and Afsari Parveen, at Akbarpur village in September 2015. The prosecution alleged that Md Ahsan Alam and Md Amir Hassan entered the house, threw acid on the victims, and were convicted under IPC sections 326A, 307, 458 and 354, among …
Sarfaraz Alam applied for pre‑arrest bail after being charged under several provisions of the Bihar Nativity and Security Act, 2023, corresponding IPC sections and Section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act for allegedly subjecting his informant, Chandtara Khatoon, to cruelty, refusing cohabitation and …
The petitioners, four brothers from Belahiya, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in Darpa P.S. Case No.62 of 2024, which alleged offences of assault, robbery, attempt to outrage modesty and other serious crimes under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR claimed they …
The petitioner, Molu Kumar, was charged under Sections 341, 323 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code (and corresponding sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes) for allegedly assaulting and attempting to kill the son of an informant. The petitioner sought pre‑arrest bail, arguing that only a single …
The petitioners, Sakendra Yadav and Sunil Kumar, were charged with murder under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly dragging the informant's son from his shop and causing his death, though the prosecution alleged that the actual shooting was done by …
The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case of impersonation during the CTET examination, where another individual, Naveen Kumar, allegedly appeared in his place. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was complicit in the cheating, citing …
The petitioner, Subhash Ratna, was implicated in a land fraud case (P.S. Case No. 1227 of 2023) involving alleged false entries in land records and multiple IPC offences (419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 427/34). He contended that he was a bona‑fide purchaser of the land from the rightful owners and had no …
Abhishek Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 121, 121(2), 109, 132 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have confessed, attempted to flee and fired on police, resulting in his own gunshot injury and …
The petitioner, Pappu Sah, was arrested in connection with a 2009 case involving alleged attempt to murder and use of explosives, and has been in custody since January 2026. The prosecution alleges that co‑accused Arun Sah and Sonu Sah threw a bomb at an informant, while the petitioner was merely …
The petitioners, a group of ten men from Malharia Tola, were charged in FIR No. 213 of 2025 for assault, outraging the modesty of female family members, and theft of gold ornaments, invoking multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and arguing …
The petitioner, Amalesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and rape case (PS Muffasil Case No. 127/2023) involving offences under Sections 363, 366A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner and co‑accused abducted the …
The petitioner, Nandkishor Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 34 for allegedly using a forged school transfer certificate to gain admission and be declared a juvenile before the Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya. He contended that he was a minor at the relevant time, had no …
The petitioners—Sunil Pandit, Dilip Pandit and Shree Devi—sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (IPC §§304‑B and 34) filed as Lalganj P.S. Case No. 320 of 2025. The FIR, lodged in 2025, alleged that the petitioners had tortured and killed the informant’s daughter in 2022 for …
The petitioner, Kameshwar Das, was charged in a 2005 FIR for offences under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code, involving dacoity and looting of ornaments. He remained an absconder for 21 years and was taken into custody on 21 January 2026. He applied for regular bail before the Patna …
The petitioner, Tabarak Ansari, was implicated in a complaint (Case No. 1668 of 2004) alleging arson under Section 436 of the IPC, with the alleged incident occurring on 15 June 2004 but the complaint filed only on 25 August 2024. He learned of the case on 28 November 2025 and was served with a …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 942 of 2024) filed under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he cheated his brother of Rs.36.25 lakh arising out of a family property partition. The complainant claimed …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 162 of 2018) alleging offences under Sections 384, 287 and 34 of the IPC for threatening an informant in a land sale dispute. The petitioner argued that the matter was essentially a civil dispute over a sale …
The petitioner, Raunak Kumar, sought bail in a kidnapping case (Sursand PS Case No. 191 of 2024) where he was accused under sections 364 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations were fabricated and that his only link to the crime was his status as an …
The petitioner, Raghunandan Yadav, was implicated in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly inciting the killing of an informant during a land‑dispute altercation. He contended that he merely shouted and was not directly involved …
Suraj Murmu, accused in a case involving alleged Naxalite conspiracy and multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, has been in custody since 30 January 2025. He filed a bail application, contending that the FIR contains only a generic allegation …
The petitioners, Meera Devi and Vikash Sharma, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑related case (PS Case No.84 of 2025) where the deceased daughter of an informant allegedly died after alleged abuse and dowry demands. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners were involved in the assault and …
Rakesh Kumar Singh was implicated in a complaint alleging that he facilitated a payment of Rs.1,50,000 and four cheques to an accused who failed to deliver a tractor, leading to charges under IPC sections 420, 406 and 120(B). The petitioner contended that he had no involvement with the agency or the …
Mukesh Singh, accused in a case involving assault with lathi and danda, sought bail after being in custody since December 2025. The prosecution alleged he participated in assaulting an informant's family and attempted to outrage modesty, charging him under IPC Sections 341, 323, 354B, 504, 506 read …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2020 under Sections 379, 34 and later 411 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging involvement in the theft of iron rods from a truck. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner loaded the goods and escaped, while the …
The petitioner, Bimla Devi, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Case No. 167 of 2023) alleged her involvement in offences under several IPC sections, including assault and theft of jewellery. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges and the existence of a counter‑FIR …
The petitioner, Dipendra Kumar, feared arrest in a theft case (Nadi P.S. Case No. 385 of 2022) under Sections 379 and 411 IPC. The FIR named three other accused, but the petitioner was not originally named; he was later implicated solely as the owner of the tempo used in the alleged theft, which he …
Luta Yadav was convicted by the Fast Track Court in Jamui for assaulting an informant and his wife with a garasa, resulting in injuries, and was sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment under Section 324 IPC. He appealed under CrPC sections 374(2) and 389(1), contending that the prosecution …
The appellant, Ramdaras Ram, was convicted under Sections 5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 for alleged misappropriation of old‑age pension funds and sentenced to six months’ rigorous imprisonment. The prosecution relied mainly on the testimony of a pension beneficiary …
The petitioners, three sons of Sajan Prasad Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a complaint (Case No. 378 of 2024) alleging they instructed payments for railway services that were not returned, constituting …
The petitioner, Akhil Kumar Roy, was implicated in a complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust, and related offences under Sections 406, 420, 323, 120B, 504 and 34 of the IPC for selling land without title. He contended that he acted under a power of attorney from the true owner, Saroj …
Avinash Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Kalyanpur PS Case No. 333 of 2023) under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the IPC. He applied for regular bail, asserting his innocence, a clean antecedent, and pointing out that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The State opposed the bail, contending that a Section 82 investigation under the Criminal Procedure Code had already been initiated against the …
The appellants appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail. They contended that they have clean antecedents and that the FIR contains vague, omnibus allegations of caste-based …
Petitioner Prabhat Kumar Dubey sought anticipatory bail after learning that a FIR had been lodged against him under Sections 384, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly forging a sale deed of land that was the subject of a pending probate case. The prosecution alleged …
Surendra Yadav and his wife Punam Devi, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant Kanchan Kumari, were charged under IPC Section 498A and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged dowry demand, caste‑based abuse and ousting …
The petitioner, Mahesh Prasad, was charged under several IPC sections for allegedly forging his date of birth to continue in service with the Bihar School Examination Board. He contended that the discrepancy arose from a clerical error, that his birth date was corrected in official records, and that …
The petitioners, Raj Kumar Sinha and his wife Poonam Sinha, obtained an overdraft loan of Rs.42 lakh from ICICI Bank under the Rural Business Credit Scheme, using the wife’s property as security. They allegedly failed to repay the loan, absconded, and the mortgaged property was later found to have …
The petitioners, Amredra Tiwari and Ravindra Tiwari, were implicated in a FIR (Case No. 245 of 2022) alleging violent assault with lathis and firearms, including the alleged assault of a pregnant woman resulting in a miscarriage. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, lack of …
The accused, convicted under IPC sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 by the Special CBI Court, filed revision applications under CrPC sections 397 and 401 seeking quashing of the conviction and a probation order. The High Court examined the discretionary power under section 401, noting no …
The accused, convicted under IPC sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 by the Special CBI Court, filed revision applications under CrPC sections 397 and 401 seeking quashing of the conviction and a probation order. The High Court examined the discretionary power under section 401, noting no …
Ratilal Maghabhai Shrimali was convicted by a Judicial Magistrate First Class for an offence under Section 409 of the IPC and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment with a fine. He filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash the conviction and also applied for regular …
The accused, Ramanbhai Damor, filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to set aside his conviction for offences under IPC Sections 471, 420 and 120(B) and to obtain probation. The trial court had sentenced him to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine, and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rameshchandra, who is accused in a 1999 case under IPC sections 307, 323, 324 and 506. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR did not specifically charge him, asserting he only carried a ballam while the co‑accused fired …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Singh, who is charged under Sections 109, 126(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged assault causing grievous injuries. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed to the bail of co‑accused, while the State …
Sarvesh Kumar, along with two co‑accused, was charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 118(2) for allegedly assaulting Roop Singh with an axe, brickbats and an iron rod, causing grievous injuries. The FIR was lodged a day after the incident, and the applicant argued that the delay and the …
Mahesh Singh Verma, holder of arms licence No. 5567, challenged the cancellation of his licence by the District Magistrate, Etawah, which was based on the registration of three FIRs involving serious criminal allegations. The petitioner argued that mere registration of FIRs, without a finding of …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Appeal No. 1934/2022) arising from a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties claimed that they had reached …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 7388 of 2025, which involved non‑compoundable offences under Sections 115(2), 131, 333 and 351(2) of the IPC. Earlier, the High Court had directed the parties to obtain a …
Shivam Namdev applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 103(1), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 115(2) and 352 of the IPC. The applicant was not named in the FIR but was later implicated by an eye‑witness; no weapon was recovered from him and no specific role in the alleged …
The applicant, Mohd Jameer, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑10, Kanpur. He asserted that the dispute with the State had been settled by a compromise dated …
The applicant, Rahul Saxena, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case (Crime No. 328 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 109(1), 308(5), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. While the application was pending, the applicant’s counsel …
The applicant Zainul Abdeen filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashal of Criminal Case No. 16813 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 69, 88, 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. A fresh compromise between the applicant and the victim was verified by the trial court on …
Ankur Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑05‑2024 in a case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that, according to the Supreme Court’s …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishan Yadav, who was charged under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 103(1), 352 and 61(2) B.N.S. for an alleged offence in Jaunpur. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that CCTV footage and eyewitness testimony did not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 21‑01‑2026 in State v. Taslim Bi and another, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicants contended, relying on the Supreme …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Tejman in a case involving alleged gold‑loan fraud, with charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated by a …
Saif Ali was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 374 of 2025) under Sections 352 and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. His first bail application was rejected, but during trial the principal witnesses turned hostile, leaving no material evidence against him. The applicant, who has been in …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 23‑08‑2021 and a cognizance order dated 27‑10‑2021 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the …
The petitioner, Nikita Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Additional District Judge (POCSO III) in Gautambudh Nagar decide the pending Session Trial No.1582 of 2022 (State vs. Sumit Jha) without unnecessary adjournments. The case involves offences under IPC …
Petitioner Vishwajeet Maurya challenged an FIR dated 27.03.2026 under IPC sections 351(3), 352 and 115(2). The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 07.04.2026, so the proper remedy was an application under CrPC Section 528/482, not a writ. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 53 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 363 and 366-A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, as well as a pending order of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings and charge sheets arising from a case under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, claiming that the parties had settled their dispute by compromise. The State …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4952 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2 of 2025) and a summoning order, and also asked the court to direct an expeditious decision on their bail applications. During the hearing the …
The applicant, Ajeet Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and No‑Objection (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the pending criminal complaint (Case No. 920 of 2024) filed against him under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Domestic Violence Act. The applicant did not press …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Madhukar Srivastava under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B relating to a land fraud. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged against …
The applicant, Smt. Amita Agarwal, filed a transfer application seeking to move Criminal Case No.30159 of 2023 (under Section 406 IPC) from Agra to Bareilly on the ground of inconvenience. The court noted that the Uttar Pradesh Rules for Video Conferencing (2020) provide a digital alternative that …
The applicant, Smt Amita Agarwal, a complainant in a criminal case under Section 406 IPC, filed a transfer application seeking to move the case from Agra to Bareilly on the ground of inconvenience. The respondent State opposed the transfer. The Court noted that the Rules for Video Conferencing for …
The applicant, Smt Amita Agarwal, filed a transfer application seeking to move Criminal Case No.30158 of 2023 (under Section 406 IPC) from the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑II, Agra to a parallel court in Bareilly, citing inconvenience. The respondent State opposed the transfer. The Court …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under CrPC Section 482 on behalf of Juvenile X, a minor accused in a case involving assault and the death of a patient due to septicemia. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedents, and that the …
Manmohan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 180 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 64, 127(2), 351(2) of the IPC and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The bail application was filed on 16 May 2025 but the applicant’s counsel failed to appear for subsequent hearings, including the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ramnaresh, who is charged under Sections 363, 376AB, 307 of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged offences against a six‑year‑old child. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of any witness examination, absence of …
Mukesh alias Bauwa, accused under IPC sections 376Ka and 376Kha and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6 for a rape offence, has been in judicial custody since March 2020. He filed a second bail application, claiming innocence, lack of medical corroboration of the alleged rape, and that his prolonged …
Mahendra applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 352, 65(2) of the IPC and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant failed to appear before the court on multiple dates after filing the bail application on 16 May 2025. The court observed that such non‑appearance …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nazim Ansari, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No.57 of 2024) involving alleged receipt of Rs.20,00,000 and charges under IPC Section 420 and IT Act Section …
Mohd. Wahid Khan filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 30.11.2023 in a complaint case involving alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …
Firoz applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 203 of 2025) involving charges under the IPC, POCSO Act and SC/ST Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated. He argued that the FIR was filed five hours after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the victim’s statements were …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitu Raikwar and Viru Raikwar, accused in Crime No. 145 of 2025 under several IPC sections and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicants, who have been in custody since 29 March 2025 and have no prior criminal record, argued …
Arpit Kumar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 87, 65(1), 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 19‑year‑old, gave a statement under Section 183 of the CrPC indicating she had travelled with the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Gurjar, who was charged under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping), 376 (rape), 328 (extortion) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident, …
Pradeep Chauhan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 598 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, initially a complainant, turned hostile during trial and later stated that she was a consenting …
The applicant, Rajendra Maurya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the trial proceedings and orders dated 04.04.2025 and 15.05.2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur, on the ground that the alleged offence occurred in Rudrapur, Uttarakhand, and therefore the …
The applicant, Mohd. Ikram, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State vs. Mohd. Ikram) involving offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. The applicant and the prosecutrix had married on 16 December 2025, and …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Babloo Kumar, who was arrested on 28‑April‑2025 in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 11 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, …
The applicant, Mandeep, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 24‑04‑2025 in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 376‑D, 354, 504, 506 and 120‑B IPC. He contended that the FIR was lodged …
Ramchet and four others filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's order rejecting their discharge application in a complaint under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 451. The revisionists argued that the complainant’s statements under Sections 200 and 244 of the CrPC contained …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sarwan Kevat, who was arrested on charges of theft (IPC s.363), rape (IPC s.376) and offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim, although recorded as 16 …
Naushad Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 533 of 2025) alleging that he had entered into a false promise of marriage with the victim and subsequently refused to marry her, invoking Sections 69, 115(2), 316(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution contended that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dipak Baheliya, who was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's uncle. The applicant alleged false implication, noting that the post‑mortem report identified a single fatal head injury (injury no. 4) and that he was not …
The applicant, Haridev, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the facts, including a two‑day delay in filing the FIR and the victim's …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul, who is accused under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and POCSO Act sections 5(L) and 6 for offences alleged to have occurred in Gautam Budh Nagar. The victim, a 19‑year‑old woman, testified that she had married Rahul, lived with him for …
The applicant, Akhilesh Vishwakarma, sought bail in Criminal Case No. 38 of 2025, charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated she had voluntarily accompanied the applicant to Bengaluru …
The applicants Maharam and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 09‑12‑2017 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 1919 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 323, 325 and 504 IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise, …
Mukesh Sahani applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 171 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 376(3) and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 indicated consent, as she had accompanied the applicant to Bengaluru for three months …
The applicant, Chandbabu, was charged under IPC sections 65(2), 333, 351(3) and POCSO Act sections 5(n)/6 for allegedly outraging the modesty of a two‑and‑a‑half‑year‑old child and committing buccal coitus on 13 March 2025. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, there was no medical evidence, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahibe Alam, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 87, 64(1), 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. The applicant claimed he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhotu Chauhan, who is charged under Sections 376, 352, 342, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC for an alleged incident in Deoria. The victim, a married woman, gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicating that she had consented and did not …
The applicant, Narendra Kumar, filed a bail cancellation application in the High Court of Allahabad seeking to set aside bail granted by the Sessions Judge, Pilibhit, to the accused Nilesh in a case under Sections 307, 34 and 504 of the IPC. The application was filed under Criminal Misc. Bail …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Anand Kumar Verma, who was in custody for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The applicant, Anil Barar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.655 of 2016, which alleged offences of kidnapping, wrongful confinement and rape under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He asserted that he married the victim in …
The applicants sought quash of a charge-sheet and cognizance order in a case under Section 506 IPC for a threatening letter allegedly dropped at the complainant's shop. The FIR named no specific accused and the investigation produced no witness testimony placing the applicants at the scene, nor did …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Devendra Yadav challenging the Additional Session Judge’s order rejecting his discharge application in a case under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. Yadav argued that the FIR was false, the injuries were caused by a blunt object and did not …
Rohit Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.55 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 64, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant contended that he is innocent, that the alleged …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Alok Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving IPC offences (452, 354-B, 427, 506, 120-B) and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application (No. 29266 of 2025) filed by Vipin, who was charged under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64 and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act in Crime No. 197 of 2025. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, the victim had consented as per her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pranshu Urf Priyanshu, who is charged under Sections 363, 366, 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged offences committed in Gajraula, Amroha. The victim, a 17‑year‑old girl, had recorded a statement under Section 183 …
The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0129 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under IPC sections 352 and 351(3) BNS and CrPC section 115(2). No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
Budhai Maurya and two others filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Session Judge’s order dated 31.05.2025 that rejected their application to contest the charge sheet. The revisionists alleged that the FIR and subsequent charge sheets were based on false allegations, that independent …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash, accused in a case involving the death of his wife, alleged to be a suicide by hanging. The applicant argued that the death was a suicide and that he had no prior serious criminal record, while the prosecution highlighted the abnormal …
Ravi Pratap Shukla applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2025) involving alleged assault and intoxication of a consenting adult woman at a hotel, with charges under Sections 64, 123 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a nine‑day delay in filing …
The applicant, Ajay Tiwari, was charged in Sessions Trial No.358 of 2025 for offences under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, arising from an alleged sexual act with a 16‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under section 183 BNSS indicated that …
The applicant, Nazir Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 8729 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. During hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew the merit-based prayer and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajeet Sharma, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 70(2) and 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Riyaz Ansari, in an identical case had been granted bail, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam Rajbhar in a criminal case (Crime No. 227 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a …
Mannu @ Monu Harijan applied for bail in a case registered as Crime No.680 of 2024, involving charges under Sections 363, 506, 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was delayed by four months, and asserted that the alleged …
Vimlesh Kumar, arrested in Crime No.216 of 2024 under IPC sections 70(2), 76, 351(3), 352 and POCSO Act sections 5G/6, applied for bail while the trial is pending. He has been in custody since 1 December 2024 and has no prior criminal record. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Suraj @ Ravi …
The applicant, Neeraj Sharma, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 253 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87, 351(3), 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and argued that the alleged victim, a major …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish Tiwari, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 87, 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the alleged victim, a …
Saurabh Gupta was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged outraging of modesty that was later escalated to rape under Sections 75(1)(i), 333, 351(3), 65(2) of the IPC and Sections 5m/6, 9m/10 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that the FIR was filed three days after the incident, …
Salman Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 63 of 2025) involving charges under the IPC, POCSO Act, and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the …
The petitioner Arshad Ahmed challenged orders of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) in Bijnor that took cognizance of offences under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the magistrate failed to consider the primary police report together with the supplementary report …
Tarun applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 285 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the IT Act. The victim, PW‑1, testified during trial that she was not sexually assaulted, that no indecent photographs were posted, and that she was not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay alias Chhotu, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 291 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 87 of the IPC, Section 65(1) of the B.N.S.S., and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed …
The applicant, Golu alias Gaurav Tamoli, filed a bail application in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 61(2), 64, 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. He claimed absolute innocence, asserting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 …
The petitioner, Arun Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 218 of 2025) under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Priyom in Criminal Case No. 318 of 2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 137(2) and 64(2)(1) and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated and that the victim’s statement under …
Manu Kumari and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge‑sheet filed in Crime No. 195 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 61(2). No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anshur, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim had consented to the relationship, …
The applicant, Ramcharan @ Golu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case (Sections 504, 506, 306 IPC). The counsel later limited the prayer to seeking permission to surrender and to have a bail application heard …
The petitioner, Mange Ram, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0385 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the …
The petitioners sought a writ challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 49 of 2025, alleging improprieties in the FIR and investigation under various IPC and D.P. Act provisions. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The petitioner, Amit Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0354 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while …
The applicant, Nadeem Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 143 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant had married the victim on 29 January 2024, a fact documented …
Manish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 402 of 2025 under Section 316(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The …
The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0216 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC sections and the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 176 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 69, 191(2), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while …
The petitioners, Amar Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0183 of 2025 under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by Additional …
The petitioner, Deepak Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 0860 of 2025) under Sections 310(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …
Krishna Shukla alias Golo Shukla filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21133 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 300 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under several IPC sections. No petitioner appeared before the court, …
The applicant, Gaurav Gautam, was facing trial under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. He and the victim had married on 19 October 2022, had a child, and executed a compromise deed. Both parties, including the victim, admitted the marriage and the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0256 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC and D.P. Act provisions. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …
The petitioners, represented by counsel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 331 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 69, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. No petitioner …
The petitioners, Nandkesh Mishra and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0020 of 2025 under Sections 85, 80(2), 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dangerous Drugs and …
The petitioners Vinay @ Vijay Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0263 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 80(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs …
The petitioner, Radha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR (Crime No. 0367 of 2024) that alleged her involvement in offences under Sections 352, 115(2), 333, 109, 118(2) and 191(1) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, while the State …
The petitioners, Khalid and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 113 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC sections. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the State was represented by the …
The petitioner, Smt. Neha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0087 of 2025, which involved offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought to question the first information report and the subsequent charge …
Petitioners Rajkumar and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet in Crime No. 383 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 61(2)(a), 111, 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, …
The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 254 of 2025, alleging their involvement in offences under various IPC sections. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The …
Brijendra Kumar Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 136 of 2025 under Sections 80, 85, 351(2), 352 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The petitioners were not present to press the writ, while the …
The petitioner, Sonu Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0313 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …
The petitioner, Vikram Singh Bhadauria, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0348 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
Yog Sagar, accused under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Sections 3 and 4, had been in jail since July 2023. After a first bail application was rejected, a second application was filed arguing that he is a law‑abiding citizen, has cooperated with the investigation, faces no risk of tampering with …
Javed Ali was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act suggested consent and she refused a medical examination, resulting in no forensic corroboration. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ekta Anand in a criminal case (Crime No. 435 of 2025) involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 315(2). The applicant claimed that the sole amount transferred to her account was Rs. 50,000, part of a settlement …
Rishipal Singh Yadav, detained since 8 December 2020, sought bail in a case (Crime No.141 of 2010) involving alleged fraud and cheating under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. His earlier bail application was rejected because he is a prior convict, including a murder conviction, and has …
