Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 5001–5200
The petition was filed by Ranjeet Singh, a husband‑advocate, seeking the High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to expedite a maintenance application (Section 144, BNSS 2023) against his wife, Neetu Singh, a government employee. The husband claimed he was unemployed and dependent, …
The applicants, Shekhar Saini and another, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No. 45 of 2024) filed by Smt. Lakshmi under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court had earlier …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed by Juvenile X, aged 17 years 11 months, seeking bail after being detained since August 2024. The revision challenged the order of the Child Court/Additional Sessions Judge, Banda, which had denied bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile …
The complainant, Baba @ Baburam, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 11 September 2025 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) which set aside a trial court summoning order and remanded the matter for fresh hearing. The trial court had earlier summoned …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Yusuf Khan, who was charged under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged fraud. The applicant argued that he had returned the entire amount of Rs.176,000 received from the informant, as ordered by a …
The applicant Rahul, charged under Sections 115(2), 64 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, has been in judicial custody since 21 October 2024. He filed a second bail application, arguing that his prolonged detention of over one and a half years violates his Article 21 …
The applicants filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash the summons dated 15‑03‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Cr. Misc. Case No. 1140 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Domestic Violence Act. The trial court had earlier …
The applicant, Jasim alias Abdul Rahman, sought bail in a fraud case (Criminal No. 277 of 2025) alleging that he and co‑accused Sheebu defrauded an informant of Rs.8,65,000. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that Sheebu was the principal offender and had already been released …
The applicant, Bhola Shukla, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 24.01.2020 and the charge sheet dated 27.12.2018 in a criminal case (Case No. 1585 of 2020) arising from FIR No. 503 of 2018 under Section 506 IPC. He alleged that the FIR was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajveer Singh Yadav, who was accused under several IPC sections for allegedly hurting Hindu religious sentiments through a book he edited and statements attributed to a co‑accused. The FIR was originally against Saroj Sargam; Yadav was …
The applicant, Majhale @ Veeresh, sought bail in a session case involving alleged rape, blackmail, and the circulation of a pornographic video under Sections 376‑D, 34, 506 IPC, Sections 5(G)/6 POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant seized the victim’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yadram, who was arrested in connection with a 2017 case alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66. The applicant, an employee of a …
The appellants, bank officials, were summoned by a Special Judge under Section 504 IPC and Sections 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act based on a complaint alleging caste‑based abuse and threats in a bank branch. The investigating officer’s inquiry, supported by CCTV footage and statements of …
Manoj Sahani, accused under IPC sections 498A, 304B and the Domestic Violence Act for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife, has been in judicial custody since June 2022. He filed a second bail application, arguing that the trial has been delayed for almost four years because prosecution …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0649 of 2024, which involved Sections 115(2), 109(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 76 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, but the State was …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0348 of 2024 under Sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while an Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The …
The petitioners, Rahul Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 335 of 2024. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by Additional …
The petitioners, Mogees and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 384 of 2024, which was based on an FIR under Sections 82(1), 85, 351(2), 115(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought judicial intervention to …
Jamuna Prasad appealed against the order of the Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act) dated 7 October 2024 which dismissed his second protest petition ex parte on the ground of non‑prosecution. The appellant argued that he could not appear due to illness and that the order was passed without affording him a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas Pasi, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant, resulting in injury to the informant's hand, a non‑vital part. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, the injury was minor, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 514 of 2024, which involved alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 125 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief against the FIR and the subsequent …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 628 of 2024) involving alleged forgery of a sale deed and property possession. The applicant argued that the sale deed was forged, that a rent agreement and a civil suit settlement demonstrated the dispute …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 213 of 2021) arising from alleged offences under Sections 376, 452, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicants proved that the accused had …
The applicant, Janu @ Ramakant Sharma, was charged with rape, criminal intimidation and offences under the POCSO and IT Acts, alleged to have possessed and helped viral a indecent video of the victim. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with co‑accused, raped the victim and blackmailed …
The petitioners Ramu Pandit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet in Crime No. 0328 of 2024, which arose from an FIR under IPC sections 109, 190, 191(2) and 191(3). The petition sought to quash the FIR/charge‑sheet on the ground that the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 366 of 2024 (Sections 331(4), 305(a), 62 BNS) by the Saharanpur Police. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by Additional …
The petitioners, Smt Kajal Devi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0513 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 333 of 2024, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and a Uttar Pradesh minor minerals rule. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash the …
Ram Briksha Yadav filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Azamgarh, which dismissed an application under CrPC Section 227 to frame a charge under IPC Section 308 against four accused, on the ground that there was no material evidence. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0432 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 80(2) & 85 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and summoning order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a case arising from alleged trespass and theft. They contended that the investigation was improper, the charge sheet was filed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiv Shankar Kannaujia, who is charged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC for alleged involvement in fraudulent sale deeds and a bank loan. The applicant, a proprietor of M/s Radhika Colonizers Private Limited, contended that …
The applicant Sabhajeet Mishra, a police Sub Inspector, filed a bail application in Case Crime No. 126 of 2025 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 447, 506, 452, 384, 307, 34 and 120B IPC, Police Station Gwaltoli, District Kanpur Nagar. The allegation against him was that he, along with co-accused …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and the magistrate's cognizance order in a criminal case arising from a land‑dispute‑related assault alleged in FIR No. 583 of 2024. They contended that the allegations were false, the injuries …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case alleging offences under IPC Sections 352, 351(2) and 333. They contended that the investigation was flawed, the statements of the complainant and witnesses were …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramashray Prajapati, who is charged under several IPC sections including 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352 and 351(3)BNS for allegedly misappropriating Rs 35 lakh invested by his wife and son. The applicant contended that the allegations …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a fraud case (Criminal No. 480 of 2024) involving alleged fake bank accounts and misappropriation of loan amounts under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applicant, a recovery agent, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6357 of 2022) arising from a 2021 crime complaint. They claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State and wished to avoid adjudication of the alleged offences. …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Pavitra Dixit, who is charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC for a crime registered in Ghaziabad. The applicant had been in custody since 27 August 2022, amounting to more than half the maximum term of imprisonment for the offences. …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 3143 of 2024, alleging that they had amicably settled the dispute with Opposite Party No.2. The trial court verified the compromise, and Opposite Party No.2 expressed no desire …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Salman, accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 682 of 2025) under IPC sections 69 and 351(2) for allegedly establishing a false marital relationship with a 20‑year‑old victim and later reneging on the promise. The applicant’s counsel argued that …
The applicant Gopal filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 26‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 376D IPC and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant …
The applicant, Smt. Bala, filed a criminal complaint (No.641 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 427 and 323 and the trial court summoned two accused based on prima facie evidence. Dissatisfied with the trial court’s order dated 22‑08‑2024, the applicant sought revision before the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jayprakash, who is accused under IPC sections 69, 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) for allegedly entering into a false promise of marriage and subsequently refusing to fulfil it. The prosecution alleged that the applicant misled the victim, while the …
The applicant, Anoop Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 311 of 2025) under Sections 64, 123, 87 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated she was a consenting party and had seen the applicant with her family before he fled the scene. The FIR was …
Petitioner Pawan Giri was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent, that the informant was not an eye‑witness, and that the post‑mortem report …
The petitioner, Sukesh Kumar, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant with the alleged intent of marrying her, invoking offences under IPC Sections 363, 366‑A and 34, and POCSO Act Section 8. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC, asserted that she …
Nagendra Manjhi was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged abduction and killing of a child. He applied for regular bail, asserting a clean antecedent and that he had been in custody since 5 July 2025. His counsel highlighted …
Petitioner Rajeev Das, charged under IPC sections 326, 307, 120(B) and Arms Act section 27, applied for regular bail in a Sessions trial. The State opposed bail, highlighting his three prior criminal cases and the seriousness of the current offences. The trial had already begun, with two of eight …
The petitioner, Ashok Sah, applied for regular bail in a Sessions trial for offences under IPC sections 326, 307, 120(B) and Arms Act section 27, alleging that he is not named in the FIR and his name appears only in the confessional statements of co‑accused who have already been granted bail. He …
The petitioner, Md. Nasim Ansari, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the BPID Act, 2017, alleging cheating and criminal conspiracy involving a loan of Rs. 4 lakh. The petitioner contended that the allegations …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was implicated in a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he and his family tortured his wife, Shivani Kumari Soni, for additional dowry after their marriage on 25‑01‑2023. The petitioner …
The petitioners, Karnvir Singh Yadav (Lallu Mukhiya) and Bablu Kumar (Bablu Yadav), applied for bail in a case registered under IPC sections 302, 120(B)/34 and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution alleged that the informant and his family were attacked on a road, resulting in the informant’s father …
The petitioner, Prithwi Raj Verma, feared arrest in a criminal case filed under several IPC provisions (341, 323, 324, 498A, 504, 506, 34) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging dowry‑related torture and cruelty. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner failed to meet dowry demands …
The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was arrested in a case involving alleged dowry demands, assault (IPC §§ 323, 498A) and violations of the Dowry Prohibition Act (ss. 3, 4). The prosecution alleged that after marrying the complainant in 2013, the petitioner and his family demanded dowry, tortured the …
The petitioner, Vivek Mishra, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Bairgania PS Case No. 05 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution’s case rests on a confessional statement by a co‑accused and the petitioner’s presence at a shop, with …
The petitioner, Sheshnath Sah, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 328, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging murder and assault. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted the informant's husband, forced him onto a motorcycle and later …
Puran Mahto was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly delivering a khukuri blow to Gunja Kumari, resulting in a simple injury. He had been in judicial custody since 11 September 2025 and possessed no prior criminal record. The prosecution emphasized the seriousness of …
The petitioner, Ram Lakhan Singh, was charged under IPC section 376DA, IT Act section 67, and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6 for allegedly raping a minor and recording a video. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and that he was not named in the FIR, while the State argued that the victim …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of an informant. The prosecution alleged that on 27 October 2023 the petitioner abducted the child, and the victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of …
The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2016 under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, fearing arrest. The State opposed, highlighting the petitioner's two prior criminal records and the ten‑year delay in filing the bail application …
The petitioners, Akloo Sahni and Jaikal Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the alleged dowry‑related death of a woman. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with other accused, strangled the deceased on 14 …
The petitioner, Sagar Pandit, was charged in a dowry‑death case under IPC sections 304B and 34 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He had been in custody since 3 March 2025 and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The petitioner, Ganesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 270 litres of liquor recovered from two motorcycles, invoking Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of …
The petitioner, Haidar, was implicated in a case under IPC sections 272 and 273/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 3.60 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Rajwar, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for a murder case (PS Case No. 10 of 2024). He has been in custody since 13 January 2024 and filed a second application for regular bail, arguing that the trial is almost complete with only the …
The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered for offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The …
The petitioner, Rameshwar Paswan, was arrested on 17 September 2025 and charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code—including offences relating to unlawful assembly and rioting—and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and that the allegations against him …
The petitioner, Bisheshwar Ray, was an executive member of Baruara PACS but resigned in September 2010, well before alleged fraudulent transactions in 2012‑13 involving cheques for paddy and wheat purchases. He was charged under IPC Sections 409, 420 and 34 for alleged misappropriation of …
Jyoti Devi filed a dowry‑related complaint alleging cruelty, assault and dowry demands against her husband Vikash Kumar and his parents, Ram Swaroop Gupta and Rita Devi. The Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of offences under IPC Sections 323, 504, 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry …
The petitioners, members of the Mistry family, filed a petition seeking the quashing of FIR No. 893 of 2024 registered at Kadamkuan Police Station for offences under Sections 493 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The State of Bihar and Sulekha Kumari opposed the petition, arguing that the …
The petitioner, Puja Kumari, filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the trial court's order taking cognizance of offences alleged against her in a case filed by Prachi Priyam. The FIR alleged offences under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 494 read with 34 and Dowry …
Lilawati Devi and Manawati Devi appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail applications in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences relating to alleged fraudulent purchase of land and caste‑based abuse. They contended that the land was …
The complainant, Bindu Devi, alleged that her husband and his relatives demanded a motorcycle and Rs.2,00,000 as dowry, subjecting her to physical and mental cruelty, assault, miscarriage, and ouster from her matrimonial home. The trial court took cognizance of offences under Section 498-A IPC and …
The appellants Sanjeet Kumar and Budhan Rai appealed against the rejection of their bail application in a case involving alleged assault, injury, and caste-based abuse under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences. They argued that the notice served on the second respondent …
Lilawati Devi and Manawati Devi appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail applications in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences relating to alleged fraudulent purchase of land and caste‑based abuse. They contended that the land was …
The petitioners, Rakhi Devi and Arjun Sao, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08‑03‑2016 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They requested that the petition be disposed of with …
The petitioner, Bhanu Ram, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, claiming he did not torture or demand dowry from his wife, Meena Devi. The matter had earlier been referred to mediation, which failed to resolve the …
The appellants appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case arising from a neighbour dispute over a drain. The FIR alleged that Pintu Kumar assaulted the informant with a knife, causing a head …
The petitioner, Md. Naoman, was named in a complaint alleging that he, together with a co‑accused, cheated a woman of Rs 16,00,000 by executing a forged sale deed for land over which he had no title, thereby constituting offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Lalan Pathak, was named in a complaint alleging cheating under IPC Section 420 and a dishonoured cheque under NI Act Section 138 arising from a disputed land sale. The complainant had paid part consideration to the accused seller, Babita Devi, and a cheque issued for refund was …
The petitioner, Anand Deb, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint filed by his wife under Sections 354A and 498A of the IPC alleging dowry harassment and cruelty. The matter had been referred to mediation, but the mediator’s report indicated that the dispute could not be resolved. The petitioner …
Petitioner Radhe Shyam Singh was arrested in a case alleging rape under Section 376(D)(A) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that in three earlier cases against him, police investigations concluded with final reports exonerating him, and that the present case was …
Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged against him under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He feared arrest and argued that the complainant, Rubi Devi, was willing to live with him at his matrimonial home in Lalganj and would …
The appellants, four members of the Yadav family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, intimidation and caste-based abuse arising from a land dispute with the informant, Lakhan Bhuiyan. Their …
Balram Mahto was charged under several IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged theft and caste‑based abuse in a shop on 4‑5 June 2024. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act, arguing that the allegations were …
The petitioner, Nayan Kumar, was accused in a complaint of cheating under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and of issuing a bounced cheque under the Negotiable Instruments Act. He claimed to have a clean record and argued that the complainant failed to appear despite receiving notice, …
The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault and caste‑based abuse. The appellants argued that the notice was validly served …
The petitioner, Sheikh Danish, was arrested in connection with a case involving kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor, charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He sought regular bail, claiming false implication, lack of criminal antecedent, and that …
Petitioner Shail Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 120B, 341, 323, 307, 380 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant with a dab. The petition highlighted a one‑month delay in lodging the FIR, the simple nature of the …
Petitioner Md. Naeem Ahmad sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleges that he pretended to marry the informant, engaged in physical relations, later refused to …
The petitioners, Shyam Kumar and Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 342, 323, 354B, 34 and POCSO Act section 8, where they were accused of threatening and attempting to molest a woman in a grain field. The prosecution alleged that …
The petitioner, Shatrughan Prasad, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint (No. 259 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, relating to alleged dowry demands, mental and physical harassment, and neglect during pregnancy. The prosecution …
The petitioner Sujit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint No.317 of 2023, which alleged dowry harassment under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. He asserted that he had not committed any offence and, to preserve family harmony, offered to pay Rs 4,000 per month to …
Jai Prakash Gupta was named in a complaint (No. 222 of 2023) alleging dowry harassment, cruelty, assault and criminal intimidation under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 506, 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and asserting …
The petitioner, Govind Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Mehdiganj Case No. 80/2022) under Sections 363, 365 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail, contending that he was falsely implicated and that the victim’s statement indicated she had eloped …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Bharti, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint case alleging offences under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that after the marriage on 14‑05‑2021, the petitioner and co‑accused demanded a car as …
Vikash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint (No. 1242 of 2021) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 379, 323 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, relating to alleged dowry harassment and physical/mental abuse. The petitioner denied any wrongdoing and offered to pay …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Chauhan, sought pre‑arrest bail for offences alleged under several IPC sections, alleging he was falsely implicated due to village politics and enmity. The FIR claimed he and others intercepted an informant’s auto and assaulted him with iron rods and a pistol, causing a …
The High Court of Gujarat heard two anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising from the same FIR (C.R. No. 11824005260237) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 467 and 120B. The applicants argued that custodial interrogation …
The High Court of Gujarat heard two anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising from the same FIR (C.R. No. 11824005260237) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 409, 467 and 120B. The applicants argued that custodial interrogation …
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Sheodan Singh and others by the Special Judge, Agra, who held that the prosecution had not proved the essential ingredients of an offence under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The trial court observed …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11‑April‑2013 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 325 and 504. The applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the dispute and the latter …
The applicants, Tipu and others, filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the criminal proceeding S.T. No.1915 of 2024 (State vs. Tipu et al.) arising from a 2018 case under IPC sections 307, 504 and 506. The parties had amicably settled the dispute out of court, and the opposite …
Deepak was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat, under IPC sections 308, 323 and 324 for stabbing the complainant, causing serious internal injuries that required surgery. The trial court held that while the injuries were grave, the prosecution failed to prove an intention to …
The High Court considered the fifth bail application of Pradeep @ Chhote, who has been in jail for about four years on a charge of murder under Section 307 IPC. Earlier four bail applications had been rejected or withdrawn, and the trial court had been directed to complete the trial within one year, …
The applicants Bhola and Neelu were charged in FIR No. 405 of 2025 for assaulting Manoj with a baton, causing serious head injuries and a fractured arm. They applied for bail, claiming innocence and alleging that the incident stemmed from a matrimonial dispute involving the victim's wife. The State …
The applicants filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 20‑02‑2025 and the cognizance‑summoning order dated 05‑12‑2025 in State v Kunwar Jyotiraditya Yadav, where the accused were charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 504 and 506. The applicants contended, relying on a …
Ram Singh Yadav was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur, under Sections 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to ten years rigorous imprisonment with a fine and an additional one‑year default term, along with a concurrent two‑year term for the lesser offence. He filed a …
The applicant, Himanshu Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute involving charges under Sections 498A, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant claimed that the parties had amicably settled …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 22‑01‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 23‑04‑2024 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, in a case arising from FIR No. 17 of 2023 alleging assault and threats under IPC …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State vs. Mohd Tasleem et al.) on the ground that they had entered into a compromise deed with the co‑defendants. Both the co‑defendants …
Santosh Paswan was arrested on 30 September 2020 in connection with a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging assault leading to death. He applied for regular bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that this was his second bail application …
Anand Prakash, accused of murder, criminal conspiracy and illegal possession of arms, applied for regular bail. The prosecution alleged that he and another person fired at the informant’s brother, who later died from his injuries. The petitioner claimed innocence, lack of witnesses, and that the FIR …
The petitioner, Santu Kumar, sought regular bail in a murder case (PS Belchhi Case No. 157 of 2025) where he is accused under Sections 103(2) and 3(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act for allegedly killing his wife, the informant's daughter, over a dowry dispute. The informant alleged that the …
Ankit Kumar was arrested for alleged murder, criminal conspiracy and offences under the Arms Act after the son of an informant died in a road accident and the accused were found with a pistol and cartridges. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that the death was due to a road traffic …
The petitioner, Gulam Ahmad Raza, was charged under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly participating in an attack on an informant and his son. The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony of a co‑accused who, in a confessional statement, named the …
The petitioner, Phul Hasan, was arrested on 19‑12‑2025 in connection with a 2017 theft case (Sakri P.S. Case No. 149) under Sections 379 and 414 of the IPC. The FIR was initially filed against an unknown person, and the petitioner’s name was later recorded based on a confessional statement in the …
Petitioners Vikki Paswan and Mina Devi filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 01-10-2016 that framed charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 504 and 34. The petition argued that the criminal proceeding had become infructuous and should …
The petitioners, a family of Ram Baran Prasad, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 04-12-2017 of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, which had taken cognizance of offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and …
The petitioners, Devendra Kumar Byas and Deepak Kumar Sah, alleged that they were defrauded by Anuj Kumar Tiwary, who sold them a vehicle that was financed by the petitioners and later failed to pay the instalments, leading to the vehicle’s repossession. The complainant claimed that Tiwary …
The petitioner, Sonelal Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case registered in 2015 involving offences under Sections 364, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, relating to the kidnapping and murder of the informant's husband. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, …
The petitioner, Md. Akin, was arrested in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) involving a loot of Rs. 2,90,000. He claims he has been falsely implicated, has no prior criminal record, and has been in custody since 21‑12‑2025, offering to cooperate with the investigation. The prosecution …
Ajit Kr. Singh was arrested in connection with a violent incident in Raxaul where, after an informant demanded money, he and co‑accused assaulted the informant and stabbed the informant's son in the abdomen. He has been in custody since 25 November 2025 and faces charges under IPC sections 341, 323, …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Chaudhary (also known as Aditya Kumar), was charged under IPC sections 341, 324, 326, 307/34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting at a victim together with an accomplice, Dilip. He has been in custody since 18 February 2026 and has eight prior criminal …
Manish Kumar was arrested for allegedly firing at a victim, causing a thigh injury, under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, asserting false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and willingness to cooperate with the trial. …
The petitioner, Raghunath Sahni, applied for bail in a case where he has been in custody since 19 September 2024 for alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the FIR is fabricated, he has a clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated. …
The petitioner Ravi Ranjan Singh was arrested on 8 August 2022 in connection with a robbery case (offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code) registered as Daudpur PS Case No. 84 of 2021. The FIR originally named an unknown offender; the petitioner’s name was later added based on a …
The petitioner, Nawaz Sharif, challenged an order dated 15‑09‑2016 in which the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) at Sasaram dismissed criminal proceedings on the ground that the limitation period had expired. The FIR, lodged on 28‑07‑2010, alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 329 and …
Petitioners Sanjay Yadav and Ranjan Yadav were arrested in connection with a family dispute that led to assaulting the informant's husband with a lathi, kulhadi and garasa, and were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code including 307 (attempt to murder). They argued that the FIR …
Shivam Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Maker P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑Ba), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he was an associate of criminals planning a loot. He had …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 02.05.2017 that summoned them to trial under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition argued that the underlying complaint case (No. 215-C of 2014) had already been …
The petitioners, Sumit Yadav and his mother Suman Devi, challenged the seizure and confiscation of their house‑cum‑premises by the Collector of Purnea after a police raid recovered 44.25 litres of illicit liquor. The State argued that the premises were used for illegal liquor storage and therefore …
The appellant, Anshu Patel, was implicated in a case involving alleged robbery, assault and caste-based abuse, with charges under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming he was not present at the …
The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 406, 323 and 354 of the IPC arising from a dowry‑related complaint by the victim Anita Devi, who alleged cruelty, assault and miscarriage. On appeal, the appellants contended that the prosecution case rested …
The appellant Md. Alam was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO case for alleged sexual assault of a minor, under IPC sections 377 and 34 and POCSO section 6, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. The conviction was based primarily on the victim's written application and …
The appellant was convicted in 2011 for rape under Section 376 IPC based on the allegation that he assaulted a 14‑year‑old girl, promised to marry her, and later refused, leading to pregnancy. The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, several family witnesses, an eye‑witness, and a medical …
Santosh Kumar Sharma appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 34 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(r)(s). The appellant claimed he was falsely implicated over a trivial dispute about plucking mangoes and argued that the FIR was vague, …
Petitioners Mithilesh and Santosh Paswan, owners of a room situated on land they claim, challenged orders directing encroachment and possession of the room after illicit liquor was seized from it. The Sub‑Divisional Magistrate had ordered the Circle Officer to initiate encroachment proceedings, and …
The petitioner, Jahagir @ Md. Jahangeer Alam, was charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, 354 and 376 in PS Abadpur Case No. 65 of 2024. The petitioner and his wife, Sakhina Khatoon, settled their matrimonial dispute through a compromise petition signed before their advocates. The petitioner applied …
Amresh Rai and Shivam Kumar Ray appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 34 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(r)(s) for allegedly assaulting an informant who claimed they blocked …
Vishal Kumar applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under IPC sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 34 and Arms Act sections 25(i)(b)(a), 26 and 35. The court examined the petitioner’s criminal antecedent, the seriousness of the alleged offences as detailed in the FIR, and the alleged complicity of …
Subhash Chandra Gupta appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379 of the IPC and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The trial court had denied bail on 18‑11‑2021. The appellant …
The petitioner, Md. Bablu Khan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint under Section 498A IPC alleging dowry‑related cruelty against his wife, Tamana Khanam. He contended that the allegations were false, he had a clean antecedent, and he was willing to treat his wife with dignity. The State and …
The petitioners, Md. Abul Kaise and his wife Sarwari Begam, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑06‑2018 that framed charges under Sections 341, 323, 406, 420, 504/34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The petitioner, Anubhav Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code alleging kidnapping of the informant’s daughter. He claimed innocence and argued that he was a juvenile at the time of the alleged offence, filing an interlocutory …
The petitioner, Rajiv Mandal, was arrested in connection with a violent incident that resulted in the death of Suman Kumar Singh and alleged injuries to others. He is charged under IPC sections 307 (attempt to murder), 302 (murder), 120(b) and 34 (criminal conspiracy), and Section 27 of the Arms …
The petitioner, Dinesh Mahto, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging a clean antecedent and false implication by the informant. The FIR alleged that on 17 September 2018 the petitioner, along with …
The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with offences under Section 354B of the IPC and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have attempted rape and indecent assault on a minor. He contended that he has a clean record, has been in custody since 7 October 2025, and that …
The accused, Nirav Dilipbhai Desai, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 11216025250593 (2025) registered at Santej Police Station for offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471. The original complainant, …
The petitioner, Sanjiv Kumar Ramkishan Goel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with an FIR alleging an offence under Section 420 of the IPC. The petitioner expressed willingness to cooperate with the …
The petitioner, Kirankumar Hiralal Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 506(2), 504 and 120‑B. The applicant argued that …
The appellant Prashant Yadav was convicted by the Additional Session Judge for offences under Sections 307, 504, 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act, based largely on the testimony of the complainant who later turned hostile and on the alleged recovery of a pistol from the …
The Allahabad High Court examined a bail application filed by Chhotu alias Anil Chauhan, who is charged in FIR No. 249 of 2025 for allegedly stabbing Jai Prakash Singh with a knife, causing grievous injuries. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that he was not arrested at the scene, no knife …
The appellants Saurabh Verma and two others appealed to quash a summoning order issued by the Special Judge in a case alleging offences under the IPC and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, filed after an unreasonable delay, and motivated by a …
The applicant, Nagendra Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in Case No. 37 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 506 IPC arising from Crime No. 68 of 2020. The applicant argued that Sections 420 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Elgin R. Singh, who was arrested in a case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 relating to the alleged fraudulent sale of property belonging to the Methodist Church. The applicant contended that the sale was authorized by the Church’s …
The petitioners, Umesh Rai and another, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 09‑12‑2025 of the Special Judge (E.C. Act) that dismissed their application for discharge under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 250(2) of the BNSS, 2023. The case involved charges under Sections …
The appellant Munnalal appealed against the acquittal of respondents Suraj Bhan and others on charges of criminal breach of trust under Sections 406 and 408 IPC. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the pendency of the appeal, the two respondents died, as …
The revision petition filed by Jitendra and others challenged the order of the Additional Session Judge who had framed charges against them under IPC sections 323, 324, 308, 504 and 506. The petitioners argued that the date of the alleged incident was inconsistent in witness statements and that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Appeal No. 04 of 2021) pending before the Civil Judge/FTC, Jalaun, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 44289 of 2024) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State. The State did not oppose the compromise and agreed that the parties could approach the trial …
The applicant, Dilshad Ahmad, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 3096 of 2017) arising from offences under Sections 376, 493, 504, 506 and 323 IPC. He argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC did …
The applicants, Pyar Mohammad @ Aliyas and Hakikat, were charged under Sections 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on a police party, although no police officer was injured. They have a criminal history of more than ten cases, most of …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed by a juvenile (X) seeking to quash the denial of bail by the Children Court/Special Judge under the POCSO Act and the Juvenile Justice Board. The revisionist argued that the juvenile, who was in custody since June 2025, had no …
The applicant, Khalid, deposited Rs.2,00,000 as bail surety and later furnished fresh sureties and a personal bond as ordered by the court. He applied to the trial court for release of the deposited amount, but the application was rejected on the ground that the case had been committed to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Jitendra @ Jeetu, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that …
Kunwar Pal Singh, a constable of the Uttar Pradesh Police, was alleged to have been intoxicated while on duty in 2011 and, as a result, a bullet from his service rifle injured two civilians. A criminal FIR was lodged and he was later tried under IPC sections 286 and 338, where he was acquitted. The …
The State filed a criminal complaint (CC No. 5390 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 500, 501 and 384 IPC arising from a land‑mutation dispute. The civil judge, however, issued a summoning order on 10‑11‑2022 charging the four applicants with offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC, …
Ashu Jain, a clerk in a district court advocate's office, was charged under Section 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code (420 IPC) and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly using fake documents to file bail bonds. He has seven prior criminal cases, all of which are old and he is presently out …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a summoning order dated 22‑12‑2015 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat in a dowry‑related complaint (Smt. Seema v. Monu). They alleged that the prosecution was malicious, that no offence under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Upendra Kumar Mishra, accused in Crime No. 209 of 2024 under IPC sections 302, 392 and 411. The FIR did not name the applicant and alleged that unknown persons committed the murder and robbery. Evidence consisted of CCTV footage showing …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑04‑2010 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 15‑05‑2010 in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 …
Surjeet Varma filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑11‑2021 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The applicant argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club (2024) 10 SCC 690, …
The applicants filed an application under the inherent powers of the High Court to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The civil court had verified a compromise between the …
The applicant, Ranveer Singh, filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 16‑01‑2020 in State v Ranveer Singh, which alleged offences under IPC Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating). The applicant argued that, based …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by a 17‑year‑old juvenile seeking bail after orders of the Juvenile Court and Juvenile Justice Board denied it. The applicant argued that he had no criminal history, the DPO report raised no specific objections, and he had been confined for an …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by 18‑year‑old Aryan Verma, accused under IPC sections 115(2) and 351(2), section 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. Act and sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 14‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramgopal @ Bhavval, who was charged under IPC sections 103(1), 309(6), 317(2) and Section 3 of the Arms Act in a case registered as Crime No. 0231 of 2024. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that CCTV footage was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 23883 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 325 and 506 IPC. Both the applicants and the opposite parties jointly submitted that a compromise had been reached and was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 01‑02‑2023, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑10‑2024, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 907 of 2024 (State vs. Susheela Devi @ Kazri and others) relating to …
The applicant, Adil, sought bail in a murder case (Crime No. 393 of 2024) under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that no incriminating material existed against him. The prosecution presented eye‑witness statements, CCTV footage showing Adil …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kunal, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the case involved cross‑reported FIRs, making it …
The applicant, Ramu Chauhan, was charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6 for offences arising from a 2021 crime. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the entire Sessions case, asserting that he had married the victim on 6 May 2022, …
The applicant, Tej Pratap Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.11188 of 2025) for an alleged rape under Section 376 IPC. He argued that the FIR was lodged more than a year after the incident, that the victim had …
The applicant, Ajay Chauhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑11‑2023, the summoning order dated 18‑12‑2023, and the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No.1159 of 2023) relating to offences under Sections …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑10‑2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 04‑12‑2019, and the entire criminal proceedings of Session Trial No.702 of 2022 relating to offences under Sections 452, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑09‑2013 and the cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2014 in Criminal Case No.126 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. Both parties …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25‑09‑2013 and the cognizance order dated 12‑03‑2014 in Criminal Case No. 127 of 2014 (State vs Laxmi Kant Mishra et al.) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 427, 351 …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Juvenile S, a 16‑year‑old accused under the POCSO Act, seeking to quash the bail denial order of the Special Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The revisionist argued that the juvenile was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rishabh Chaurasiya, who is the brother‑in‑law of the FIR complainant. The FIR originally contained charges of dowry harassment but no rape allegation; however, during investigation the complainant recorded statements alleging rape. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raghvendra Pratap Singh alias Ghuran Singh in a case (Crime No.235 of 2025) involving alleged firing on a police party under Section 109 of the BNS Act and Sections 3, 7, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, which correspond to Section 307 of the IPC. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Indrapal Urf Nidha, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitish Kumar Singh @ Mohan Singh, who was charged under Section 109(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly opening fire on police during an encounter, though no police officer was injured. The applicant claimed false implication and that he …
Petitioners Sanjeev Kumar and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 10‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under several IPC sections. During the hearing, the petitioners withdrew their challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that any bail …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit, who was accused under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and a provision of the Bombay Narcotic Substances Act in a case pending before the trial court. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that …
Petitioners Parwati Prajapati and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 22‑02‑2026 lodged by a third‑party informant under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions. The State argued that an earlier FIR dated 03‑02‑2026 had …
Petitioner Suresh Kushwaha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑11‑2025 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew his challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that the lower court decide his …
Petitioners Shivesh alias Bholu Pandey and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and later added section 117(2), as well as Section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act. After arguments, the …
Petitioner Bheem Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 11‑04‑2024 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The State argued that the petition was filed more than two years after the FIR, constituting an inordinate delay and invoking the …
