Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 5201–5400
The revision petition was filed by a 17‑year‑old juvenile who had been in a child observation home since November 2025, seeking to quash the denial of bail by the Special Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board. The petitioner alleged false implication, lack of incriminating evidence, and that the bail …
Ajay Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR dated 21‑06‑2025 registered under Sections 123, 303(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the petitioner withdrew the challenge to the FIR and instead sought a direction that …
The applicant, Chhote Lal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 21‑06‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 25‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No.15299 of 2025. The charge‑sheet alleged offences …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and the magistrate's cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 127(2) of the IPC. They argued that they were falsely implicated, the injury report was …
The applicants Kallu and four others filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 6059 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 0088/2024 under IPC sections 147, 452, 323, 504 and 506. They contended that the cognizance order dated 1 July 2024 was issued before the …
The Allahabad High Court considered three applications under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash Criminal Complaint Case No. 586 of 2019, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The complaint arose from a civil dispute over land and sale deeds, where the complainant …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amola Devi and Malti Devi, who were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and other statutes for a violent incident in Kushinagar. The applicants argued that the FIR and witness statements ascribed a general role to …
Sudha and Sapna filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a provisional order dated 23‑01‑2026 passed by the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate of Bhognipur, Kanpur Dehat in FIR No. 1736 of 2023 under IPC Sections 354 and 506. The High Court …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Kavi Chandra, who was charged under IPC sections 103(1), 190, 191(2) and 191(3) for a murder alleged to have occurred on 16 August 2025. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was absent from CCTV footage, and that …
The applicants, Munishwar Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 30‑09‑2025 issued by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)‑II, Bareilly in a criminal complaint under IPC sections 420 and 506. They alleged that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 28‑11‑2025 in Crime No. 454 of 2024, alleging that the FIR and charge‑sheet did not warrant interference. The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order …
The complainant, the mother‑in‑law of the applicants, alleged that they conspired with bank officials to open a joint account and misappropriate Rs 10 lakh, leading to a complaint under Section 156(3) CrPC. The police report characterized the matter as a family dispute and found the allegations …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code challenging an interlocutory order dated 18‑02‑2026 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, under Section 145 of the B.N.S.S. code. The applicant’s counsel argued that the order was not based …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Satyapal Singh, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 25 of 2025) involving alleged misappropriation of Rs 2,20,000 and cash of Rs 1,40,000. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Suneel Kumar, who was charged with IPC offences (420, 468, 471, 120‑B) and IT Act offences (66‑C, 66‑D) relating to alleged cyber fraud and forged GST refunds. The applicant …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 10315 of 2009, which involved offences under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act. During the pendency of the trial, a compromise deed was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Nazir, who was in custody since 9‑December‑2024 for offences under Sections 65(1), 351(2), 74 BNS of the IPC and Sections 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the informant and victim, who were …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Rai, who was charged under several IPC provisions and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged indecent photography of a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no indecent photograph was recovered, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 01.04.2006 and the related criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 263 of 2006). The court examined the complaint and found that the allegations disclosed a cognizable offence and were …
The applicant, Dev Mani Pandey, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑03‑2018 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. The applicant and the opposite party, who are living as husband and wife, executed a compromise …
The applicant, Piyush Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a provisional order dated 30.05.2025 passed by the Family Court, Prayagraj, in a matrimonial dispute involving alleged dowry harassment. The respondent (State of U.P. and another) had filed a FIR …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking to stay the execution of a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in case No. 3865/2023, which involved offences under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506. The applicant argued that the NBW should be set aside and requested …
The applicant, Ayush Pratap Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking a stay of criminal proceedings (CrPC sections 323, 504, 506, 406) initiated by the Civil Judge (Junior) of Sant Kabir Nagar. The court heard arguments from the applicant’s counsel and the …
The applicants, practising advocates, were accused in a criminal complaint (sections 420, 467 and 468 IPC) filed by Manjeet Singh arising out of a partition suit they were handling. A non‑bailable warrant was issued against them, and they sought to quash the warrant and the underlying proceedings by …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashik Rajpoot, who was charged under Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on a police party. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that no police were injured, he …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused Subhash Yadav, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deeraj Kumar Upadhyay, accused in a case under Sections 420, 386, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged seven months after the alleged incident, that his name only …
The applicant, Dilshad, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 422 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the B.N.S., and the Information Technology Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated by statements of co‑accused arrested at the scene, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1610 of 2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, alleging that the dispute is a family matter that could be settled …
Manvendra (Monu) applied for bail in a case under Sections 317(2), 317(5) of the IPC and the Arms Act, alleging that the recovery of a pistol, cartridges and ornaments was false and that there is no independent witness or corroborative evidence beyond his confession. The State opposed bail on the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.S.T. No.40 of 2016) arising from Complaint No.23 of 2016 (Subhash Arya v. Deepak Kumar & others) and the summoning order dated 23‑04‑2016. They alleged that a matrimonial dispute had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 75580 of 2023) filed under Sections 452 and 323 of the IPC, alleging that the case stemmed from a civil dispute and was instituted maliciously. The court observed that …
The applicant, husband of a woman who died within 13 months of marriage, sought bail in a dowry death case (Criminal No. 376 of 2024) alleging that the death was a suicide and that the post‑mortem report was erroneous. The prosecution argued that the post‑mortem indicated strangulation, making it a …
Vishal @ Shubhnit Trivedi was arrested in Crime No. 0010 of 2024 for alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC and Sections 66-C, 66-D of the IT Act. He has been in custody since 30‑12‑2025 and claims innocence, asserting that the only link to him is a mention in the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit (also known as Nikhil), who was arrested under sections 65(1), 351(2), 352, 131 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 15‑year‑old girl. The defence argued that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mithun, accused in Crime No. 233 of 2025 under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 110 and 105. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the principal offender was the co‑accused Reeta Devi, who allegedly caused the fatal head …
The applicants, Ashok and eight others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 30‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 09‑04‑2025 in State v. Sandeep Kumar (Case No. 946 of 2025) relating to offences under various IPC sections. …
The applicant, husband of a woman who died by hanging within two and a half years of marriage, sought bail in a case filed under Section 80(2) of the Indian Penal Code (dowry death) along with Sections 85, 115(2) IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that the …
Ramkumar, an accused, filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that dismissed his application for discharge in a criminal case under IPC sections 419, 420, 468 and 471. The High Court examined whether it could entertain …
The applicants, Akash and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 16‑06‑2024 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Mainpuri, in a complaint case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 354, 504 IPC and …
The accused, Kamal Kumar Tharad, filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, which dismissed his application for discharge and framed charges under Sections 419, 420 and 406 of the IPC. The High Court examined whether it could …
Sunita and three others filed an application under Section 91 of the BNSS seeking to quash a March 20, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, which had rejected their bail‑bond request in a criminal case involving offences under IPC sections 452, 323, 504, 506 and 308. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 732 of 2024) arising from an FIR alleging offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 307, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that they were falsely implicated to further a …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Nitish @ Shivendra, who was named as an accused in a suicide case under Section 306 IPC. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, that he had no prior criminal record, and that a charge‑sheet had …
The appellant, Smt. Ranjana Singh, the first wife of Rohit Singh, filed a suit under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking to declare her husband's second marriage to a woman identified as "X" void. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding that only a party to the second marriage could …
The applicant, Golu alias Ranveer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a session case involving alleged extortion, assault and other offences. He contended that the allegations were vague, that no substantive evidence linked him to the alleged …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑07‑2021 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No.1944 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 308, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties jointly submitted that a compromise …
Gopal, a 20‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a case (Crim. No. 316 of 2024) alleging offences under the IPC, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act, the alleged victim being a 14‑year‑old girl. Gopal contended that the relationship was consensual, citing the victim’s statement recorded under …
Jaypal was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The victim, who had initially testified, turned hostile during trial, undermining the prosecution's case. The applicant pleaded innocence, asserted no prior criminal record, and argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arshad alias Irshad, who was charged under IPC sections 137(2), 64, 351(2) and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a sexual relationship with a 21‑year‑old woman under a false promise of marriage and subsequently aborting …
The petitioner, Banti Sikarwar, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 16‑04‑2025 that gave rise to Crime No. 55 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent‑4 submitted a short counter‑affidavit stating that the parties had reached an …
The applicant, Babloo, was arrested for alleged assault and sexual assault under several IPC sections after an incident on 7 December 2024. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed a day late and that the victim’s allegations of rape were added later without medical corroboration. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 20 June 2025 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code arising from a matrimonial dispute. The High Court referred the matter to the Mediation Centre, where the parties eventually entered …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 994 of 2022) arising from an FIR alleging assault and threats while erecting an electric pole. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, there was no injury to the complainant, and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 3001 of 2021) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Kishan Kumar Saini under Sections 354A and 504 of the IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise, …
The accused filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a July 1, 2025 order of the Judicial Magistrate, Meerut that dismissed their discharge application under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 354, 504, 506 IPC …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking the court's direction for early disposal of a criminal trial (Case No. 73735 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 380, 411 and 457 of the IPC. The trial court had recorded the examination‑in‑chief of witness Anil Kumar on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 9 July 2024 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1771 of 2021 (State v. Virendra and others) relating to offences under Sections 308, 323 and 504 IPC. Both the applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No. 13113 of 2025 (State v. Kamlesh Ojha et al.) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325, 504, 506 and 308. The parties had entered into a compromise on 29 July 2025, which was verified by …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 32608 of 2014) instituted under IPC sections 406 and 420, on the ground that the parties had entered into a verified compromise dated 23 July 2025. Both the applicant’s counsel and the …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 337 of 2022 and the charge‑sheet dated 19‑Jan‑2019, which arose from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party asserted that they had amicably settled the …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special S.T. No.384 of 2023) against Mahendra alias Sonu Rajbhar and others for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 10337 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 221, 121(1), 132, 352 and 351(3). The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the trial court verified the …
The applicant, Tinku alias Ram Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No.27 of 2000, Crime No.52 of 2016) pending before the Special Judge, POCSO Court, Bareilly, which were based on IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 488 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act. They claimed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a compromise …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal case No. 35366 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party. Both parties admitted …
The applicant Amit Kumar Chaudhary filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal case No.3089 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC relating to alleged short‑supply of paddy. He contended that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and the pending criminal case (Case No. 266 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached a …
Shariq alias Kashif was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 244 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 123, 64, 351(2) and 61(2)(a) of the IPC for allegedly circulating an indecent video. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS expressly denied that the applicant made the video, …
The accused, Nafeus, applied for bail in a rape case (S.T. No.470 of 2025) arising from Case Crime No.454 of 2024. The applicant’s counsel argued that the victim was a consenting party, that both the victim and the accused sustained injuries, and that the allegations amounted to false implication. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and related criminal proceedings (Case No. 7869 of 2025) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party, which was verified by the trial court. The opposite party …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by a juvenile (aged 15 years, 10 months) seeking to quash the denial of bail by the Children's Court and Juvenile Justice Board. The revisionist argued that the juvenile was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, the FIR was lodged after an …
The applicant, Rohit Prajapati, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 69 alleging that he had entered into a false promise of marriage and subsequently refused to fulfil it, leading to a claim of deception by a 26‑year‑old victim. The applicant contended that the allegations were …
Vikas Chaudhary filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking an ad‑interim mandamus directing the DGP of Lucknow to reinvestigate Crime No. 173 of 2023 under IPC sections 504 and 506 and to submit a fresh police report. The State argued that the investigating officer had already filed a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet (No.145/2018) and related proceedings in a criminal case arising from offences under Sections 147, 323, 324, 352 and 506 of the IPC. Both the applicants and the second opposite …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ravi Karan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 64(2)F, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the IPC, alleged to involve misuse of dowry laws. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, being the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 19‑12‑2024 and the entire criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 159 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 120B, 506, 420, 419 and 386 IPC. The applicants argued that they …
The applicant Sonu filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Cr. No.9 of 2024) pending before the Special Judge (POCSO) in Bareilly, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajpal, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 352, 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3(2) and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged outraging the modesty of a 16‑year‑old girl, later escalated to rape. The applicant pleaded innocence, highlighted the …
The petitioner, Goverdhan alias Ajeet, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 04.10.2025 that dismissed his discharge application in a case under Sections 376, 504 and 506 IPC. The Additional District and Sessions Judge had dismissed the discharge application and subsequently framed …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application to quash criminal case ST No.491/2008 (State v. Paramhansh Singh) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and the trial court verified the compromise. Both the applicant …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Govind Chauhan and two relatives seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Sessions Case No.510 of 2022) arising from offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicants …
The applicants, Ekta Lunia and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ghaziabad who refused to renew their passports on the ground of a pending criminal case. The High Court had earlier allowed their …
The applicant, Baliram, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a theft case (Sections 457, 380, 411 IPC) filed against him. He alleged that the investigation was flawed, there were no eyewitnesses, and the magistrate had taken …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pushpendra Singh, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that the trial had not been concluded within 60 days of the first date fixed for taking evidence, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saqib, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 137(2), 64(1), 127(2) and sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged after a delay, and that …
The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash a notice dated 12‑July‑2024 and related proceedings in a domestic‑violence case (Case No. 127/12/24, Nitesh v. Amit). The applicants, who are in‑laws and a sister‑in‑law of the opposite party, alleged that the complaint filed by …
The appellant, Jaleshwar Mahato, was charged under multiple IPC offences and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a 2023 case. He appealed the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail, arguing that he was not an accused in a related earlier case and that …
The petitioner, Aditya Anand, was charged under IPC sections 279 and 336, the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (sections 30(a) and 41), and the Indian Electricity Act (section 139). He had seven prior cases, two under the Excise Act, and had been in custody since 2 June 2025. After a previous …
Md. Salman, originally an informant in a cyber‑fraud case, was later implicated as an accused under IPC sections 319, 318(4) and 111 and IT Act section 66(D) based largely on the confessional statements of co‑accused Abhimanyu Kumar and Rahul Kumar. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted no …
The appellant Sujit Kumar was charged under IPC sections 302, 394 and 34, several provisions of the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for a robbery‑murder incident. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the prosecution had not conducted a TIP and that only three of …
Pawan Kumar was charged with purchasing stolen property in a theft case where three children in conflict with the law, identified from CCTV footage, claimed to have sold the stolen articles to him. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that only the allegation of purchase …
Petitioner Parwez Alam sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC, alleging that the FIR was filed without a show‑cause notice despite his alleged use of a forged teaching certificate. He also disclosed two prior cases under …
Laddu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging kidnapping, rape, and related offences under Sections 366, 376, 506 and 34 of the IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean record, that the allegations are false, and that he and …
The petitioner, Sonu Nut, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 332, 333, 307, 353) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 75 litres of liquor near a canal. He has six prior cases …
The petitioner, Priya Ranjan, was implicated in a case (Chhatauni P.S. Case No.357 of 2022) alleging conspiracy to withhold smart meters and demand a ransom of Rs.10 lakh, invoking Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. He contended that the allegations stemmed from a monetary dispute with his employer, …
The appellants, members of a family involved in a land dispute, were charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a land broker and seizing his property. Their anticipatory bail …
The petitioners, six residents of Deokuli village, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging assault under IPC sections 147, 149, 504, 323, 307 and 325. The FIR was filed ten days after the alleged incident, which arose from a neighbour dispute, and the injuries were described as …
The petitioner, Amresh Yadav, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 126(1), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 103(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the assault and death of an informant's father. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Bali Nut, was arrested in connection with offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 332, 333, 307, 353) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He had been in custody since 11‑11‑2025 and earlier sought regular bail, which was denied …
The petitioners, Md. Halim and Shabana Khatoon, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case (Chakand P.S. Case No. 337 of 2025) where they were alleged to have participated in the torture and strangulation of the victim. The prosecution …
The Patna High Court heard an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajesh Singh, who feared arrest in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Bihar Excise Act. The petitioner contended that his name does not appear in the FIR and that the police were unlawfully seeking to …
The petitioner, Upendra Prasad, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 103(1), 123 and 238 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly killing the minor daughter of an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner administered sulphur leading to the child’s death, while the …
Sunil Singh was arrested for offences under Sections 272, 273 and 420 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleged to have recovered 89.200 litres of illicit liquor. He has seven prior cases, five under the Excise Act, and has been in custody since 7 March 2026. He previously …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case (Mashrakh P.S. Case No.583/2022) involving the consumption of spurious liquor that resulted in one death and fourteen injuries. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 272, 273, 328, 308, 304, …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Sah, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 701.25 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle, facing charges under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean record, was not apprehended at the …
The petitioner, Anjan Ranjan, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Shahpur PS Case No. 94 of 2025) where the FIR alleged that accused persons assaulted the informant, leading to his death. The petitioner contended that his name does not appear in the FIR and was only implicated later …
Rampyare Singh filed a criminal writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to complete the investigation of PS case No. 299/2022, arrest the main accused who had warrants issued, and ensure their appearance before the trial court. The petition alleged that the investigation had been …
The appellant, Raushan Kumar, was charged in a 2019 FIR for multiple offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He contended that the FIR did not specifically allege his participation, noting that co‑accused Jangali Singh and Lalu Kumar had …
Shaurabh Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging he received marriage expenses after a marriage was called off, leading to charges under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34. He contended he had a clean antecedent, that the informant’s daughter voluntarily married another person before the …
Amar Kumar (Amar Bind) was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302 read with 34 IPC) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from an incident where he and co‑accused allegedly surrounded an informant's house, fired indiscriminately and assaulted the informant's son …
The petitioner, Chandeshwar Rai, was arrested on 11 February 2022 in connection with a case involving the alleged robbery and shooting of an informant’s motorcycle, charged under IPC sections 394 and 307 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based on the confessional statement of …
The appellant, Bipin Bihari, alleged that his daughter was subjected to dowry demands and torture by her in‑laws, culminating in her disappearance and presumed murder on 5 July 2022. He filed an FIR charging the husband, his brother‑in‑law and two in‑law women under Sections 498A, 304B/34, 201, …
The appellant, Atal Yadav, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for a murder that occurred on 27 March 2024. He has been in custody since 20 November 2024 and his regular bail application was …
Sunil Kumar was arrested on 25 September 2024 in connection with a case involving assault, theft, threats and later a murder charge under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted the informant's mother with an iron rod, stole Rs 2 …
The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging he enticed a minor for marriage. The prosecution alleged that the minor disappeared and was allegedly taken by the petitioner. The petitioner argued that the victim’s statement …
The petitioner, Alok Kumar, was arrested on 21 August 2025 in connection with a 2020 FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the IPC, the Uttar Pradesh Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He filed a bail petition claiming the FIR was fabricated, that the informant was not an …
The petitioner, Malti Devi, was arrested on 15 October 2025 in connection with a case of alleged abetment of suicide under Sections 306 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that an altercation between the informant's daughter and the petitioner led to false accusations, which …
Raman Sahni was arrested on 4 November 2025 in connection with a June 2023 assault on the informant’s mother‑in‑law, allegedly using an iron rod, and charged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 379, 427, 504 and 34 of the IPC. The petitioner argued that the incident stemmed from an admitted land …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Zehaan Subhasish Das, who was charged under Section 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 for alleged non‑consensual sexual intercourse, forcible recording and …
The petitioners, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its officials, challenged an Industrial Court order that had upheld the suspension of employee Suresh Kadam and treated the suspension period as leave, alleging that the suspension and subsequent fine of Rs.5,000 were illegal and …
The High Court considered three criminal bail applications filed by Ateev Vrajlal Gala and co‑accused, who were charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 34, 465, 467 and 471 for allegedly misrepresenting that flats were free of mortgage and forging a ‘no due’ certificate. The prosecution alleged that …
The applicant was charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act and the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Regulation for allegedly cheating investors by inducing them to invest in residential flats, forging documents, and diverting funds to a bogus …
The High Court considered three criminal bail applications filed by Ateev Vrajlal Gala and co‑accused, who were charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 34, 465, 467 and 471 for allegedly misrepresenting that flats were free of mortgage and forging a ‘no due’ certificate. The prosecution alleged that …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Yadav, accused of demanding Rs.2,00,000 as extortion and assaulting a school principal with a lathi, applied for regular bail after being in custody since 6 January 2025 and a charge‑sheet being filed on 15 November 2025. The petitioner argued that the filing of the …
Mithilesh Bhagat was in judicial custody for offences under Sections 379, 341, 324, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, stemming from an alleged shooting incident at his cousin’s marriage. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the investigation was incomplete. The …
The petitioner, Shabaz @ Sabaj, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC section 376 (rape), sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, and section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The victim, a minor who was pregnant and later gave birth, claimed she was in a …
The petitioners, a group of 26 individuals from villages in Rohtas district, were charged under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 121(2), 324(5), 132 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly attacking a police station during a land‑dispute related law‑and‑order operation on 13 July 2025. …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272 and 273 and several provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. They contended that they were not in actual possession of the seized liquor, were not owners of the trucks involved, and that the case against …
The petitioner, Hemant Jha, was implicated in an FIR (Case No.147 of 2022) alleging embezzlement of wheat and rice worth Rs.6.23 crore under IPC sections 406, 409 and 420. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had a clean antecedent, and was only a data‑entry operator in the godown for seven …
Arjun Rai was arrested in connection with offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to alleged possession of liquor seized from two motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the …
Dudhnath Nut was arrested in connection with a case (PS Marhowrah Case No.746 of 2023) alleging offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, including alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Santosh Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 728/2021) involving serious offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act, including murder, attempt to murder and illegal liquor possession. He contended that the liquor (27 litres) was …
The petitioners, Chunchun Khatun and Ayesha Khan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR dated 27‑10‑2025 relating to a communal disturbance where stones were allegedly thrown at a Durga procession. The prosecution alleged offences under numerous sections of the Indian Penal …
The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar, was named in FIR No. 271/2024 for alleged participation in the murder of Abhilasha Kumari and subsequent concealment of the crime, invoking multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the allegations were fabricated, he had a clean antecedent, and …
Awadhesh Rai applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 420, 120(B) and 34, and several provisions of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no liquor in his conscious possession, and was implicated only through a confession …
The petitioner, Baiju Kumar, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was accused in a case involving murder, attempt to murder, assault, and offences under the Arms Act arising from a police encounter in which a police officer was shot and later died. The FIR does not specifically allege that the petitioner …
Mahesh Kumar Ray sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving offences under several IPC sections (279, 353, 307, 427, 272, 273, 34) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act relating to the alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a sack …
Rakesh Kumar Mishra sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR (Case No. 423/2023) alleging multiple IPC offences and a violation of the Bihar Control of Use and Play of Loudspeaker Act, arising from stone‑pelting at a Durga procession near a mosque. The petitioner argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was arrested in a case registered under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. He contended that the alleged kidnapping did not occur, asserting that the victim voluntarily traveled to Allahabad, contacted him, …
The petitioners, a husband and wife, were implicated in a 2020 case (Simri P.S. Case No. 395) for offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 354(b), 337, 504, 506 and 34, alleged to have assaulted and harassed an informant over a water‑dispute. They contended that the allegations were false, the FIR was …
Ramesh Mukhiya was arrested in a murder case under IPC sections 363, 364 and 34 after an informant alleged that Mukhiya had confessed to killing Tuntun Sahani. The petitioner contended that he is innocent, pointing out that the victim's wife, under a Section 164 statement, said the victim had …
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Maharajganj P.S. Case No.183 of 2021) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault, robbery and criminal intimidation. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, …
The petitioner, Yuvraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with alleged offences under IPC Sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery of 79.02 litres of liquor. The petitioner claimed he was not in …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Rai, was arrested in connection with a case involving the transport of 218.93 litres of foreign liquor and cash, alleged under Section 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The prosecution claimed he was the intended recipient and …
Subodh Rai, the owner of a motorcycle from which 72 litres of illegal Nepalese liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he was falsely implicated as his name appeared only because he owned the vehicle. The petitioner asserted a clean antecedent and that the seizure was from the …
The petitioner, Biru Rai, was charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120B and Arms Act section 27 for a violent incident in which the son of an informant was abducted, assaulted and shot dead by co‑accused Gauri Rai. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner only verbally abused the victim …
Navneet Kumar, the owner of a pick‑up van, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 1,899 litres of illicit foreign liquor and charged under Sections 420, 467 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that …
Kumar Abhishek sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with FIR No.239/2024 for robbery under Section 392 IPC. The FIR named four accused who allegedly snatched Rs.1,30,000 from a bank employee, but the petitioner’s name was not originally mentioned; it …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Singh, was charged under IPC section 376 and POCSO Act section 6 for raping the minor daughter of the informant. He has been in custody since 31 December 2020 and is handicapped. Earlier bail applications were denied, but the court allowed him to renew the bail plea if …
Vasist Kumar was charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly stopping a motorcycle, insulting the victims on caste grounds, assaulting them and snatching a gold chain. The appellant contended that the FIR was filed …
Vijay Kumar was arrested in connection with a land‑sale dispute alleged by Manorama Devi, who claimed she paid an advance of Rs 51 lakh for a plot that later turned out to belong to the Housing Board. The prosecution alleged that Kumar received Rs 21 lakh in a joint bank account with Dhiraj Singh …
The appellant, Kumar Roshan Yadav, was charged under several IPC offences and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with caste slurs and physical violence. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Additional …
The petitioner, Vishwanath Sahni, is in judicial custody for offences including dowry death and related IPC sections arising from a case registered on 8 December 2022. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner tortured his wife for dowry, leading to her death. The petitioner filed a criminal …
The appellant Bhupendra Singh appealed against the acquittal of respondent Dhanushdhari Singh (R-2) in a case registered under IPC sections 363, 366A and later 302. The Sessions Judge had acquitted the accused due to lack of conclusive circumstantial evidence. During the hearing, counsel for the …
The appeal challenged the acquittal of four accused under Sections 307 and 379 of the IPC and the compensation awarded to the victims. The incident arose from a land dispute during which the informant and his son were assaulted, sustaining grievous injuries. The trial court found the prosecution …
The petitioner, Dilip Paswan, applied for bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 130 litres of liquor and 3000 litres of semi‑manufactured jawa‑mahua solution from a joint family house. He …
The appellant, Chandra Kant, was implicated in a land fraud case where the informant alleged that he, along with others, defrauded him of about Rs. 49 lakh and later threatened him with caste‑based abuse. The appellant contended that he was falsely implicated due to village politics and that the FIR …
The appellants were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting and abusing the informant and her daughter with caste‑based slurs. The prosecution alleged that appellant No.3, Md. Ramjan, struck the informant on the …
The petitioner, Jainath Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case involving 27 accused for the alleged brutal assault and murder of a deceased person, charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 309, 504, 506) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …
Umar Farooque was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 8,000 litres of raw spirit and charged under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Excise Act sections 30(a), 33, 41 and 47. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no raw spirit was found in his possession, and the …
The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving robbery, dacoity, murder and illegal possession of arms, as alleged under Sections 392, 397, 302 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the deceased was intercepted and killed by three …
The petitioner, Bheema Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 34, 120B and Arms Act section 27, with Section 302 later added, for allegedly firing at the deceased. He applied for regular bail, claiming false implication, lack of eye‑witness testimony, and that no witness had yet been …
The petitioner, Sakesh Sahiba (also known as Sakesh Kumar), was arrested in connection with offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 3049.98 litres of liquor from a third‑party's house and the seizure of a …
Roshan Kumar was named in a FIR (Jamui P.S. Case No. 545 of 2025) under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and alleged to have assaulted an informant, causing head injury. Both parties, who are co‑villagers, sustained grievous injuries and the petitioner sought to avoid arrest …
The petitioners, Ramesh Chaudhary and Bhushan Singh, were arrested in connection with a case registered under several IPC offences (including murder, attempt to murder, and criminal conspiracy) and provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 relating to illegal liquor. They contended …
Jaikant Rai was arrested in connection with the recovery of 330 litres of liquor and two motorcycles from a house belonging to Ramakant Rai, alleged to be a joint family property. He faces charges under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …
The petitioner, Indradeo Yadav, was arrested in connection with a POCSO case alleging abduction and sexual offences under Sections 363, 366A, 365 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 6 and 8 of the POCSO Act. He had been in custody since 12 July 2024. He contended that he was falsely implicated and …
The petitioners, Bhola Kumar and Chhotu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 4,400 litres of liquor recovered from Rahul Kumar, with charges under several IPC sections and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. They contended that they were …
The petitioner, Dinesh Nut, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, relating to alleged violent acts and the recovery of 75 litres of liquor. He had been in custody since 30‑01‑2026 and claimed that the liquor was seized from a public …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, was charged with offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly serving spurious liquor that caused a death and serious illness. He had been in custody since January 2026 and was not originally named in the FIR; …
The petitioner, Chikku Kumar, was charged with murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and with an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that on the date of the incident, the petitioner and others opened fire on the informant’s brother and others, …
The petitioner, Chhotu Pandit @ Prince Raj, was charged under IPC Sections 414 and 34 read with Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) for allegedly recovering 5,727.24 litres of liquor from a truck and a Swift Dzire. He was not seized at the scene, did not possess the seized vehicles, and …
Ganga Sagar Paswan applied for pre‑arrest bail in a 2017 case alleging assault and related offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The FIR alleges that Paswan and co‑accused assaulted an informant …
The appellants, who are in‑laws of the complainant, appealed against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge rejecting their anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 354, 504 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging recovery of 8.640 litres of liquor and offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 41 and 45 of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Raushan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR, lodged on 11 June 2023, alleged that the petitioner had abducted the informant’s 15‑year‑old daughter who had allegedly eloped with him …
The petitioner, Sushil Sharma, sought bail in a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 48 of 2024) where he was alleged to have participated in the abduction of a minor under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 34, the SC/ST (POA) Act and the POCSO Act. He contended that the FIR was filed after an inordinate delay, …
The petitioner, Sheshnath Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 38(i) and 41(i) for alleged recovery of 2,220.48 litres of liquor from a car and four motorcycles. He contended that he had no …
The petitioner, Shivandra Kumar Ray (aka Shivam Mishra), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(b) and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41(1). He argued that he was not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, that the only …
The appellants, three brothers, were charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged offences. They applied for anticipatory bail, which the trial court rejected, prompting this appeal. The State …
Ritik Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged possession of 60.12 litres of illicit liquor and a country-made pistol, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act and Section 414 IPC. The prosecution’s case rests on a confessional …
The petitioner, Bholi Yadav (Arvind Kumar Yadav), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2014 dacoity case (IPC s.395) after his name was mentioned in the confessional statements of co‑accused. The FIR was lodged in 2014 against unknown persons, and the investigation later identified the …
The petitioner, Ashok Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) arising from PS Shahpur Case No. 344 of 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was named as an accomplice by a co-accused, Sandeep Kumar, and highlighted the petitioner’s prior …
The petitioner, Md Asraful, was implicated in a case concerning the seizure of 648 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle he owned, alleged to be offences under IPC sections 272 and 273 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the …
The petitioner, Kailu Yadav, was in custody since 8 October 2025 for alleged kidnapping of an orphan child under IPC sections 364, 323 read with 34. He claimed a clean antecedent and that the allegations were false and fabricated, noting that co‑accused persons had been granted bail earlier. The …
The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was named in an FIR for kidnapping under IPC sections 363, 366(A) and 34. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, a clean record, and that no specific allegation was made against him, noting that four co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. …
The appellant, Dani Yadav, was charged under several IPC provisions and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which the Special Judge rejected. The appellant appealed, seeking to set aside the …
The appellants sought anticipatory bail after being charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court had already taken cognizance of the offences, and the State opposed the bail on that ground, citing the Supreme Court …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that he, along with others, cut a mustard crop in violation of a Section 144 order and assaulted the informant, causing simple injury, thereby invoking IPC sections 341, 323, 307 and 34. The petitioner contended that …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he and his sister abducted a woman and attempted to force her into prostitution, invoking IPC sections 365, 366, 34, 323, 376 and 504. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent and that he had been in …
The petitioner, Kanhai Sah (Krishan Kumar), was charged under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. The FIR was lodged on 30 June 2024, more than two months after the alleged incident on 24 April 2024, and the State opposed bail. …
Vikash Kumar Sahni applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging he was the assailant of the deceased. The prosecution contended that he was directly involved in the murder and that he is already in custody since …
The petitioner, Taruni Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No.125/25) filed under IPC sections 309(4) and 351(2) based on an FIR lodged on 7 June 2025. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, had intercepted an informant en route to a marriage …
Shalini Kumari applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 1028 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 452, 323, 427, 420, 406, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleges that she and co‑accused Bablu Kumar cheated people by promising jobs, collected Rs 10 lakh, …
The petitioner, Balram Kumar, was implicated in a case (Nadi P.S. Case No. 172 of 2025) alleging forgery and cheating under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and a clean antecedent, and expressed willingness to comply with any …
Lakshman Singh was arrested in connection with a 2020 case alleging his participation in indiscriminate firing that killed a man, charged under IPC sections 302, 504, 34 and Arms Act section 27. He applied for bail, arguing that no specific role was assigned to him and citing a prior bail order …
The petitioners, Lalbabu Ray and Vigan Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Chiraiya PS Case No.102 of 2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, with 40 litres of illicit …
The petitioner, Raman Kishor Kumar, husband of the complainant Rubi Devi, was charged under IPC sections 323, 325, 504, 406, 497, 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4 for alleged abuse and dowry demands. He had earlier been granted anticipatory bail but the bail bond was cancelled because …
Abdul Quddus, an 82‑year‑old accused, sought bail in a case (Parihar PS Case No. 167 of 2019) where he is alleged to have been part of a mob that caused the death of Md Akram and is charged under multiple IPC sections including murder and assault. The petitioner argued that there is no specific …
