Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 10601–10800

AANAND @ SNEHJEET NAMDEV PANCHAMUKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Aanand @ Snehjeet Namdev Panchamukh, was charged with murder, rioting and arms offences arising from a 2019 incident. He had been in custody for over six years while co‑accused of similar charges were released on bail. The prosecution argued motive, eyewitnesses and risk of tampering, …

RAJIV DEVENDRA SONEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, Prajakt Prabhakar Surve and Rajiv Devendra Sone, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No.648 of 2025 for alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and 34 relating to a disputed car transaction and alleged forgery. The prosecution alleged that the applicants, together …

Kariman Chaudhary @ Mritunjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kariman Chaudhary was arrested on 11 July 2025 in connection with a murder case (Udwantnagar PS Case No. 195 of 2023) alleged under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the accused, including the petitioner, fired at the informant's father, while …

Govind SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Govind Sah, was implicated in a FIR dated 04-06-2020 for multiple offences under the IPC and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the FIR specifically attributes the assault to another co-accused, Brij Mohan …

Tauseer Alam @ Chunnu @ Takbeer AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tauseer Alam, was arrested on 3 November 2025 in connection with a case registered on 11 March 2023 alleging offences under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code, involving an alleged robbery and assault on a pick‑up van. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner …

Rameshwar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rameshwar Kumar, was implicated in an FIR alleging cheating, forgery and related offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Examination Conduct Act for allegedly using an electronic device for gambling during an examination. He contended that no device was recovered from his …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kundan Kumar was named in an FIR relating to a protest against the Agnipath Scheme, alleged to have participated in mob violence and property damage under multiple IPC sections and the Damage of Public Property Act. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated, and that his …

Arun Kumar @ Arun BinversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Arun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated as an assailant in a shooting incident that resulted in two deaths and one injury, linked to a gang conflict over illegal sand mining. The FIR, filed under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms …

Radhe MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Radhe Mahto, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged dowry‑related murder of his sister‑in‑law. He claimed to have a clean record and argued that he could not have informed the informant of the killing, suggesting the …

Priti KumariversusAyush Kumar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Priti Kumari filed an application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking transfer of her divorce suit from the Family Court at Saharsa to the Family Court at Muzaffarpur. She alleged dowry demands, physical torture and cited three related proceedings pending in Muzaffarpur – a criminal case …

JAY KUMARversusThe State of Bihar through C.B.I. Patna

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Jay Kumar, an advocate, sought anticipatory bail in a special case involving alleged offences under Sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(D) of the P.C. Act. The court found that he had fraudulently misled the trial court by submitting a forged …

Vikash Kunal @ Vikash Kumar @ PappuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered an application for anticipatory bail filed by Vikash Kunal, who was implicated in a complaint alleging fraud, cheating, criminal breach of trust and violations of the IT Act for promising a government tender to the complainant, receiving large sums of money, issuing a …

ASHIS VERMA @ ASHIS KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Ashis Verma (also known as Ashis Kumar) feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft of ornaments from an informant's house. The FIR was initially lodged against an unknown person, but the investigation identified the petitioner as having …

Nishu Devi @ Nishu KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Nishu Devi, was implicated in an FIR alleging participation in a violent assault on an informant's family, arson of the informant's house, and administering poison that caused the informant's brother's death. The offences alleged fall under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 323, 324, 307, …

Pappu @ Majid @ Mohammad MajidversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pappu @ Majid @ Mohammad Majid, sought anticipatory bail after police, acting on secret information, raided a hotel and apprehended members of an online fraud gang who named him as an associate. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in offences punishable under IPC …

Bharat ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Bharat Chaudhary and Rita Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry death case involving the alleged murder of their daughter-in-law. The prosecution alleged that they, along with others, committed offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code …

Ajay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Ajay Yadav was convicted for firing at an informant who refused to pay a demanded rangdari amount, causing a firearm injury to the victim's left thigh near the scrotum. The trial court sentenced him to ten years for attempt to murder (IPC s.307), seven years for attempt to cause grievous hurt (IPC …

Shailendra MohanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shailendra Mohan, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Dowry Prohibition Act, claiming he neither demanded dowry nor subjected his wife to cruelty. The prosecution alleged that after marriage, the petitioner and …

Sumitra Devi @ Sumitra KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sumitra Devi, was implicated in a complaint case alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for receiving Rs 1,05,500 as part of a Rs 60,00,000 transaction related to a land sale. The petitioner contended that the dispute was purely civil, she had no …

Baldeo RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Baldeo Rai was arrested in connection with a 2001 case involving alleged assault, firing of weapons, and the death of a victim, charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he was merely an order‑giver, had no incriminating material against …

Mantu kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Mantu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR alleging kidnapping of a minor girl (Section 363 IPC), rape of the minor (Section 366A IPC) and related offences (Section 34 IPC). The prosecution presented a statement of the minor victim recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal …

Abdul JalilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Abdul Jalil sought anticipatory bail in a case involving the seizure of 8,000 litres of raw spirit alleged under IPC sections 272, 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He contended that he was never named in the FIR and was implicated solely on the confessional statement of co‑accused …

Monir Miya @ Manir MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Monir Miya was arrested in connection with a 2016 case involving alleged assault, arson and the death of a woman, charged under IPC Sections 341, 323, 326, 307, 504, 34 and later 302. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that no incriminating material was found on his person and that the …

Satyendra Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint case (No.862 of 2021) alleging offences under Sections 342 and 384 of the IPC, which alleged extortion and wrongful confinement. He contended that the allegations were false, arising from a loan dispute where the …

Vishwajeet Singh @ VishuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Vishwajeet Singh petitioned for bail in a case where he is accused under IPC sections 498A, 377, 376, 323, 379, 341 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4 for allegedly raping his wife, demanding dowry, threatening her family and causing bodily harm. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, …

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Baitha, was accused in a kidnapping‑for‑ransom case (Bela P.S. Case No. 23 of 2023) that also involved charges of murder, concealment of evidence and criminal conspiracy under Sections 364A, 302, 201, 120B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that …

Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry harassment case (IPC Section 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3 & 4) filed by his wife, Sanju Kumari, who alleged continuous dowry demands and that she was thrown out of the house. The trial court had earlier ordered the couple …

Vijay SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Vijay Sah, a director of an unauthorised Nidhi company, was charged under Sections 406, 420, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged misappropriation of approximately Rs. 2 crore. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court, having been in custody since 7 November 2023 and …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court considered the petition of Ranjan Kumar, who is in custody for alleged murder under IPC sections 302 and 34 and offences under sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act, where the dead body of a minor girl was found in his house. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that he had …

Sipahi SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Sipahi Sahni was arrested in connection with offences under IPC sections 354B, 376, 34 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 8. An earlier bail application was rejected, with the court allowing a fresh petition after nine months. The petitioner, in custody since 26 June 2024, applied for bail again, claiming …

Bhupendra Kumar Mehta @ Bhupendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Bhupendra Kumar Mehta was arrested in connection with a case (PS Jadia Case No. 273 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein the husband of an informant was allegedly assaulted with a lathi, fatta and iron rod, resulting in his …

Jitan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jitan Paswan, was charged under Sections 302, 34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a murder‑related case. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court after an earlier bail denial. The trial court had examined eight of nine witnesses, with …

Amrit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Amrit Kumar Umesh Kumar Das, applied for regular bail in a case under Section 392 of the IPC for robbery, with charge already framed and the petitioner in custody since June 2024. The petitioner argued that a co-accused had been granted bail and that the trial was pending. The State …

Raju Kumar @ Raju Prasad GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar, is in custody for alleged offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a case lodged on 27 July 2022. No counsel appeared on his behalf, and the petitioner failed to appear before the court on 11 April 2025 and …

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Munna Yadav was arrested in connection with a violent land dispute that resulted in the death of Devendra Yadav and injuries to several others, and was charged under sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149 of the IPC and sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 9 …

Arjun SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Arjun Singh and Abir Hussain, sought bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of a father. They argued that the prosecution's case is based solely on circumstantial evidence and that there is no direct or …

BHOLA MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhola Mahto, filed a bail petition after being implicated in a FIR alleging assault on the head of the informant’s son, with injuries described as simple. The FIR charges him under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 504, 506 and 34. The petitioner asserted a clean antecedent and …

Md.ArshadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Arshad, was charged under IPC sections 302, 504, 506/34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a case arising from an alleged gun‑shot incident. He has been in custody since 25 July 2020 and his bail applications were rejected three times earlier. The petitioner argued that the trial …

Sujeet Kumar @ Dr. Sujeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a 2018 FIR alleging multiple IPC offences, including assault and attempts to outrage modesty. He had previously filed an anticipatory bail application (Cr. Misc. No. 22956 of 2023) which he withdrew on 17 October 2023. After …

Sudarshan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a former Panchayat Sachiv, was accused of embezzling Rs 1,56,63,200 under government schemes, alleged to have violated Sections 420, 409 and 34 of the IPC. He contended that the work was completed, he could not obtain a completion certificate, and he had deposited Rs 1,56,17,700 …

ARJUN PATELversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Arjun Patel, sought regular bail in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34, alleging that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution alleged that Patel assaulted the informant’s son with a knife blow to the abdomen and kidney after demanding payment of …

SANU @ SONU @ SAHIL KUMAR SINGH @ SAHIL KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sanu @ Sonu @ Sahil Kumar Singh, was arrested in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 354(c), 354(a), 504, 506, 34 and POCSO Act section 11. The FIR, filed by Tulsi Kumari, claims the petitioner made obscene remarks at a wedding, threatened the victim with forced marriage, and …

Abhay Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar Sahani, sought bail after being implicated in a theft case involving maize, alleged under IPC sections 379, 420 and 34. He was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced only through a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no material evidence linking him to the …

Md. NiyajudinversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Niyajudin, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under several IPC sections, including murder, after a rape attempt and assault led to the victim's death. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused Mainuddin and a neighbour committed the crime, but the …

Monu Kumar Singh @ Monu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Monu Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case involving 2.7 kg of charas and a loaded pistol, charged under IPC s.414, several provisions of the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. He has been in judicial custody since 21 March 2024, and no charge has yet been framed. The petitioner sought regular …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Vikash Kumar, an employee of CMS Info System Ltd., was charged under sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 303(2) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly transporting Rs 20 lakh in a Swift Dzire car to load cash at a State Bank of India ATM in Gandhi Maidan. The prosecution alleged that he and …

NITISH KUMAR @ MANORANJAN @ BABLUversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought regular bail in a kidnapping case (IPC s.363) registered as Kurtha P.S. Case No.115 of 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner abducted the informant’s daughter, who later went missing. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, had a long …

Lalan DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lalan Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple IPC offences (Sections 341, 147, 149, 353, 307, 354, 323, 504, 506) and Sections 5 and 6 of the Essential Services Maintenance Act, arising from an incident on 14‑02‑2023 where a road was blocked with a …

Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for murder, with the prosecution alleging that he administered a lethal injection to the deceased. The trial court had earlier denied his bail application, relying on a confession and case diary entries. The petitioner argued …

Baban YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Baban Yadav, was charged in a 2017 rape case (IPC sections 376 and 34) and entered judicial custody only in April 2023, remaining detained for nearly three years. He applied for bail, arguing that he had already suffered extensive custody and would appear diligently in the pending …

Bijendra JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bijendra Jha, a junior engineer, was implicated in an FIR dated 18‑08‑2022 alleging fraud involving Rs 57,27,553 related to work in the Madhepura Vidhan Sabha constituency for FY 2014‑15, with charges under IPC sections 420, 409, 467 and 468. Jha contended that the primary accused, …

Sachin Kumar @ Sachin MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sachin Kumar was named in an FIR for murder under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the IPC. The informant was not an eye‑witness and no material was produced linking the petitioner to the crime. The petitioner asserted innocence, clean antecedent and pointed out that co‑accused had already …

Karu @ Karu Singh @ Sanoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, accused of attempted rape and related offences under IPC sections 452, 376, 511, 380, 379, 323, 504, 506 and 427, filed anticipatory bail applications arising from Complaint Case No. 1346 of 2022. Their earlier applications were dismissed on merit on 26‑10‑2024 and 22‑11‑2024. They …

Sandeep sahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Sah, was charged under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged human trafficking, involving a fake Instagram ID used to lure the victim to a dance company. He had previously applied for bail, which was rejected on 26-03-2025 with a direction that he could renew the …

Karan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Karan Singh was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy and illegal possession of arms under IPC Sections 302, 120B/34 and Arms Act Section 27. His earlier bail petition was rejected, with a direction that he could renew after six months if the trial was not concluded. The petitioner now sought …

Mithilesh Mandal @ Mithilesh Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Mandal, was charged under IPC Section 376(D‑A) and POCSO Act Section 4(6) for allegedly raping a minor. The prosecution alleged that the accused forcibly took the victim on a motorcycle, gagged her, and committed rape. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that …

Ram Pukar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Gaya district, filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail in connection with a 2012 case (PS No.71) alleging offences under Sections 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, their counsel requested permission for the petitioners to surrender …

Sanjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a murder case (Section 302/34 IPC) where his name does not appear in the FIR but was mentioned during investigation. The prosecution alleged that the informant's son was killed by co‑accused Kalu/Amit Kumar and his associates. The court …

Mahendra MarandiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mahendra Marandi was charged under IPC sections 363, 364, 365, 506 and later 302, as well as Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for the alleged killing of a deceased person. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner argued that no …

Bharat Rai @ Bharat RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Bharat Rai was charged under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly shooting and killing the son of an informant during an altercation. He has been in custody since January 2022 and filed a fourth petition for regular bail, which was previously rejected. The prosecution …

Shivnath MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Shivnath Mahto and Halim Mian, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft of computers from a school. They contended that they were falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only basis for …

Aanand Thakur @ Anand Kumar Sharma @ Aanand Kr. SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aanand Thakur, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. for allegedly assaulting an informant during a dispute over a Rs. 4 lakh loan. He claimed innocence, stating the incident was a simple fight in self‑defence and sought pre‑arrest bail, expressing willingness to settle …

Lushan Singh @ Amit Kumar @ Lushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Lushan Singh, was charged with murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with the death of a informant's son. He has been in custody since August 2022 and has filed a third petition for regular bail, arguing that the only allegation is that he was last …

Shail DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shail Devi applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. for alleged assault, injury and attempted outrage of modesty against an informant. The petitioner contended that the dispute stemmed from a land conflict between the parties and was essentially civil, …

Bali NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Bali Nut, accused of offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, had earlier been granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to verification of his criminal antecedents. The verification revealed eight prior cases, leading to cancellation of …

Vikash Kumar ManjhiversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of eight men, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a criminal case (PS Dariyapur Case No. 428/2025) alleging assault on the informant's son arising from a land dispute. They claimed innocence and argued that the matter was essentially civil, seeking an amicable settlement outside …

Vikash Paswan @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Vikash Paswan, filed a petition seeking regular bail in a POCSO case (Case No. 13 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 376(D), 376(DA), 120(B), 506, 509 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The petition was filed before the Patna High Court after a report …

Sandeep Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar Das, was charged under sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for a murder-related offence. He applied for regular bail after an earlier bail application was rejected on the ground that the trial was ongoing. The High Court noted that the trial was at its final …

Anuj Singh @ Anuj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anuj Singh, was implicated in a case under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Sections 30(a), 38 and 42 for allegedly possessing 450 litres of spirit in a tractor. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession, and was not …

Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers and their mother, were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for assaulting an informant and her son with an iron rod and allegedly stealing cash. They claimed the incident was a trivial civil dispute …

Ram Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which the husband of an informant was shot dead by a group of armed assailants. The petitioner sought regular bail for charges under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Arms Act, while the informant opposed bail, …

Arti KumariversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Arti Kumari, sought cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party, Avinash Kumar, in a criminal case under Section 498A IPC concerning alleged dowry harassment. The parties had attempted mediation, initially agreeing to live together, but the mediation later …

Sabuja DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of villagers, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant’s family and stealing Rs. 80,000. They claimed innocence, asserted that the matter had been compromised with the informant, and highlighted their clean …

Rupesh Yadav @ Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rupesh Yadav, arrested on 14‑12‑2022 for alleged murder under IPC sections 302/34 and Arms Act section 27, sought bail after a prior bail application was dismissed and a Special Leave Petition was withdrawn. He contended that he has a clean antecedent and was falsely implicated due to political …

Kameshwar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three residents of Maraujhia, sought protection from arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging they were falsely implicated in an assault and outraging modesty of an informant. They contended that the dispute arose from a trivial …

Usha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Usha Devi, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2024) under Sections 302, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. She contended that she is an innocent woman falsely implicated, highlighted a five‑day delay in lodging the FIR and pointed out her …

Laiba Fariyal @ Laiba FarihalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Laiba Fariyal sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against her under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Although the police had taken cognizance of the offence based on the charge sheet, they had not arrested her and she had cooperated with the …

Nikesh Kumar @ Nikki MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Nikesh Kumar and Brajesh Mandal, feared arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and the IPC for assaulting an informant and his family. They claimed innocence and sought an amicable settlement, invoking the Supreme Court's decision in …

Guni PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Guni Paswan, sought modification of an anticipatory bail order dated 12‑09‑2025 because he had inadvertently omitted his prior criminal case in the original bail petition. The original order incorrectly stated that he had no criminal antecedent, whereas he was actually involved in a …

Shanti Devi @ Puja DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shanti Devi and Arun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (IPC 304B/34) where the prosecution alleged they demanded a motorcycle and Rs 50,000 as dowry, leading to the death of the informant’s sister. The petitioners contended that the deceased fell …

Shambhu SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shambhu Sah, was arrested in connection with a dacoity (Section 395 IPC) involving armed robbery of two houses on 28.04.2024. He has been in custody since 15.07.2024 and possesses ten prior criminal convictions. The prosecution’s case relies on the confession of a co‑accused, as the …

Krishna RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Krishna Rai was arrested in November 2022 in connection with a case involving offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected by the High Court in June 2023. The petitioner filed a second bail …

Santosh Kumar Chaudhary @ Santosh ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santosh Kumar Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a violent incident involving the burning of vehicles and assault on workers during the construction of a railway bridge, alleged to have been orchestrated by a group of extremists. The prosecution listed him among 63 accused persons and charged …

Pappu Singh @ Pramod SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Pappu Singh was charged under IPC sections 341, 307, 302, 506, 34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in judicial custody since 11 January 2024. After an earlier bail denial, he sought bail again, arguing that only nine of fourteen prosecution witnesses had been examined. The State opposed, …

BHUPENDRAKUMAR NAGINBHAI MAYAVANSHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellants Bhupendrabhai Mahyavanshi and Prakash were convicted for the murder of Manish under Sections 302, 120‑B and 201 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment and five years respectively. The prosecution’s case was based solely on circumstantial evidence – alleged motive (a love‑affair), a …

JIVANBHAI CHATURBHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

RULE ISSUED AND PARTLY ALLOWED

The High Court considered a successive bail application filed by Jivanbhai Chaturbhai Solanki, accused No.3 in a murder case (Sections 302, 323, 506(2), 294B, 114 IPC and Section 135(1) Gujarat Police Act). He had been in custody since his arrest on 1 Oct 2017 and the trial remained pending. The …

Pramod Kumar Singh @ Pramod Kumar KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar Singh, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 399 and 402 of the IPC, sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substance Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner escaped from a police raid at …

AWADHESH RAIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, Awadhesh Rai, Bigu Rai and Ajit Rai, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant by caste name, assaulting him with a lathi, and stealing Rs. 3,500 and a gold locket. They …

Vijay Kumar Rajak @ Vijay BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Kumar Rajak was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 379, 498A/34 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, relating to alleged cruelty and dowry demand. The petitioner argued that the allegations were vague and that the dispute had been …

MOHAN KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appeal concerned the rejection of anticipatory bail for Mohan Kumar Singh, brother‑in‑law of a Scheduled Caste informant who alleged caste‑based abuse, dowry harassment and forced eviction after an inter‑caste marriage. The charges were under IPC §§ 323, 498A, Dowry Prohibition Act §4 and SC/ST …

Shankar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shankar Sharma appealed against the denial of bail in a murder case (Azam Nagar PS Case No. 187 of 2024) where he was charged under IPC sections 302, 120(B), 34 and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the informant's husband was killed over a …

Sanoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sanoj Kumar was named in a 2023 complaint alleging cruelty, dowry demand of Rs. 2 lakh, and an attempt to murder the complainant by pouring kerosene oil, invoking Sections 498A and 307 of the IPC, Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and a second marriage claim. The petitioner’s counsel argued …

Umesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner Umesh Ray was named in an FIR for the alleged murder of the informant’s son, which the FIR claims was staged as a suicide arising from a love‑affair dispute. The petitioner contended that the informant was not an eyewitness and that the allegations were based merely on suspicion, …

Md. MushtaqueversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Mushtaque, was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging dowry demands of Rs.1 lakh and a motorcycle, and subsequent assault, torture, attempted arson, and threats of a second marriage, invoking Sections 323 and 498A of the IPC. The petitioner contended that the magistrate …

Sanjay RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, was named in a criminal complaint (Case No. 181 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 498-A and 504/34 for cruelty and assault against his wife, Sunita Devi. The petitioner argued that the complaint was filed after a 16‑year gap following his second marriage …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners – Raushan Kumar, Raju Sahani and Suman Kumar – were named in an FIR for allegedly kidnapping a 16‑year‑old girl with the intent of illicit intercourse or marriage. Earlier, anticipatory bail for the first two petitioners had been rejected and that for the third withdrawn. The …

Sitaram SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Sitaram Sahni and Rajeev Sahni were named in an FIR for multiple IPC offences and sections 8 and 10 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have sexually assaulted a 14½‑year‑old girl. They contended that the sexual assault allegation was false, arising from a monetary dispute, and that the police …

Parmeshwar Yadav @ Parmeshwar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, three Yadavs, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya, which had rejected their anticipatory bail application in a case registered under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR alleged that the appellants, armed with …

Ram Maya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Maya Devi was named in a criminal complaint (CR No. 894/2022) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 420, 467, 468 and 471, arising from a dispute over cultivation of a field. The petitioner’s husband allegedly assaulted the complainant when the latter tried to cultivate the land. The …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged kidnapping and sexual assault of a 13‑year‑old girl, invoking IPC sections 365, 363, 341, 323, 504 and 506/34. The victim later gave a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. stating she left home voluntarily, was not kidnapped, and that any …

Ranjan Singh @ Rajan @ Rajan Singh @ RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ranjan Singh, was charged in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and his anticipatory bail was denied by the SC/ST Exclusive Special Judge. The appellant contended that the specific charge of sexual assault pertained only …

Lallu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lallu Yadav appealed against the order denying him anticipatory bail in a case where his son, Ramdayal Yadav, was accused of attempting rape and Lallu was alleged to have abused the complainant with caste slurs. The FIR invoked several IPC sections and provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of …

MD.MOHIUDDIN ANSARI @ MOHIBUDDIN ANSARIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The appellant, Md. Mohiuddin Ansari, was convicted in 2009 for offences under Sections 307, 323, 341, 498A and 504 of the IPC based on the testimony of his wife (the informant) and several relatives. After a 16‑year delay, the appellant sought relief and an Amicus Curiae was appointed. The High …

RITESH KUMAR @ AZADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, five residents of Bahadurpur village, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant over a credit chicken dispute and extorting Rs.30,000. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the …

Bir Bahadur Singh @ Bir SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Bir Bahadur Singh and Dhanu Singh, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly stopping a fish seller's motorcycle, abusing him with caste slurs, assaulting him, and extorting Rs 10,000 and a mobile phone. They contended that the …

GAYATRI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The informant alleged that on 26 January 2021 she was molested, verbally abused and assaulted by appellant Munib Chauhan, who also threatened to kill her, and that the informant’s father was assaulted with various weapons. The case was registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 352, 506 read with 34 …

Raushni Kumar @ Roshni KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 504/34 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant by caste name, assaulting him with fists, a lathi and slaps, and stealing Rs.2,000. They sought anticipatory bail, which the …

Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Dipak Kumar and Ganesh Singh, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, abusing him by caste name, and robbing him of Rs.5,000. They applied for …

Moti MahtoversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants Moti Mahto and Shivpujan Mahto filed an anticipatory bail appeal against a Special Judge's order rejecting bail under the SC/ST Act in a case involving alleged casteist abuse, assault, and theft. Appellant No. 2 withdrew his part of the appeal after being arrested, and the court …

MALTI DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, Malti Devi, Jitendra Sharma and Ram Kumar, appealed against the order of the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) dated 06‑09‑2021 which rejected their anticipatory bail application in a case registered under IPC sections 420 and 34 and Section 3(i)(f) of the SC/ST Act. They alleged that the …

Bhawan Yadav @ Bhawan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Bhawan Yadav and Guddu Sao were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for allegedly trespassing, verbally abusing with casteist slurs, assaulting an informant and disrobing his wife on 8 August 2023. They contended that the case was false, arising from a neighbour …

Satyendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, a group of villagers from Haspura, were charged under several IPC provisions (sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 379) and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and her daughters with lathi and danda and abusing them …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Golu Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 34 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, abusing him with caste slurs, and extorting Rs.30,000 and a gold chain. He sought anticipatory …

Chhedilal yadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four Yadav brothers, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly forcibly taking harvested paddy, abusing and disrobing a woman on caste grounds. They contended that the FIR, lodged 20 days after …

Sujeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Sujeet Kumar, Sonu Kumar and Chandan Kumar were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 34 and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with sticks and iron rods and using caste slurs. They applied for anticipatory …

NITESH KUMAR @ NITISH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging cruelty and dowry harassment under Sections 498A and 34 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, demanding Rs.2 lakh and a four‑wheeler. The petitioner contended that the allegations were baseless, …

Md MustakimversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md Mustakim, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Trial No. 4426 of 2023) arising from a 2017 dowry‑related complaint that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 504, 323, 307, 406, 420 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution …

Ranjeet YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ranjeet Yadav, was charged under several provisions of the IPC, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged assault on the informant's nephew. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. On appeal, the counsel …

MUKESH SHARMA @ MUKESH KR. SHARMAversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Mukesh Sharma was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO trial for offences under IPC sections 366, 376 and 323, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, contending that the victim’s complaint was filed after an unexplained 26‑day delay, that the alleged …

Reyaj Ali @ Reyajuddin MiyanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Reyaj Ali, was charged with kidnapping, assault and caste‑based harassment of a 14‑year‑old girl, alleged to have been abducted on a motorcycle with the aid of armed men. The prosecution’s charge‑sheet also includes offences of attempted rape, sexual assault under the POCSO Act and …

Debnath Mukherjee @ Deo Nath MukharjeeversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Debnath Mukherjee was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 120(B) relating to a dispute over the sale proceeds of a flat. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, stating he was …

SUNIL RAIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants Sunil Rai, Kamlesh Rai and Anil Rai appealed against a Special Judge's order rejecting their anticipatory bail applications in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 34 and SC/ST Act section 3(i)(x). The High Court examined whether the appeal was maintainable given that …

Rishu Kumar @ Rajeev Ranjan RajversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Rishu Kumar, was charged with murder and related offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302 and 504 of the IPC and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the death of the informant's son, Niranjan Kumar, who was allegedly assaulted by …

MD.MANAURI MIYA @ MD.MONAWWARversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Md. Manauri Miya, was charged under multiple IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for verbally abusing, assaulting and firing a gun at an informant, injuring her hand and threatening to kill her. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected …

Praduman Kumar SawversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Praduman Kumar Saw, was charged under several IPC provisions, the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Information Technology Act for allegedly sending obscene photographs of the informant to her husband and threatening her. He applied for …

Md. Ashfaque @ Ashfaque AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 71‑year‑old PDS dealer, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, relating to alleged black‑marketing of rice and wheat worth Rs 11 lakhs. The petitioner claimed …

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Sudhir Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that he was named in an FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that on 7 October 2022, co‑accused Sonu Kumar attempted to appear for a …

Dr. Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dr. Sudhir Kumar, a medical officer at Motipur Primary Health Centre, was accused of causing the death of a patient during a family‑planning operation, invoking Sections 304 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he performed the surgery with a valid …

Umesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Umesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a murder case (Sections 302 and 34 IPC) based largely on a co‑accused's confessional statement, as his name does not appear in the FIR. The prosecution alleged that a brother of an informant was shot …

Rohit SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, a group of residents from Hardiya village, were named in an FIR alleging that on 14 May 2024 they assaulted an informant’s family and threw acid, invoking IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 326B, 504 and 34. They filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail, claiming they are innocent and …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raushan Kumar was arrested on 22 July 2025 in connection with a Mahila Police Station case alleging offences under Sections 376, 354(C)/34 of the IPC and Sections 66(C) and 67(D) of the Information Technology Act, involving alleged sexual relations with a married woman and the taking of private …

Rama Nandan Bhagat @ Ram Nandan BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rama Nandan Bhagat and Ramdeo Bhagat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 384, 341, 323, 506 and 34, and Arms Act section 27 for an alleged assault on an informant and his family on 17‑08‑2015. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, …

Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, was arrested on 1 June 2024 in connection with a rape allegation involving the two‑year‑old daughter of an informant, under Sections 376(A) and 376(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution presented a medical examination report …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pankaj Kumar was arrested on 27-08-2025 in connection with a case alleging rape, assault, and robbery under IPC sections 376, 323, 354, 354B and 384. The prosecution alleged that he entered the complainant's house and committed the offences, while the petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and that …

Ravi Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Ravi Kumar Mandal sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Section 366(A) alleging kidnapping of a woman. The prosecution alleged the informant's daughter eloped with a man, but the petitioner contended he was falsely implicated, asserting that he had married …

Mantun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mantun Yadav and Raja Ram Yadav were charged under multiple IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 354, 504, 506) and sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly entering an informant's house, abusing her with …

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sachin Kumar and Raju Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (G.R. No.3001 of 2023) involving a motorcycle allegedly stolen under Section 379 IPC. They argued that they were not named in the FIR and were only linked to the crime because the vehicle was later …

Chhote Lal RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhote Lal Rai, was arrested in connection with a Mahila Police Station case alleging cruelty and dowry harassment under IPC sections 498A, 341, 323 and the Dowry Prohibition Act for demanding a motorcycle as dowry. The petitioner contended that he and his wife had been living …

Pappu MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Miya, was implicated in a robbery case (IPC Section 392) arising from an incident on 06-11-2023 where two assailants allegedly stole a motorcycle key, cash and parcels. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that a confessional …

Sharwan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Sharwan Kumar and Mantan Chandrabanshi, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Konch P.S. Case No. 607 of 2022) that alleged their involvement in violent assaults causing head injuries to an informant and his two sons, and injuries to four persons. The prosecution charged them under …

Manoj RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Manoj Rai was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) and illegal possession of arms (Section 27 Arms Act). He has been in judicial custody since 13 June 2024. A prior bail application was rejected by a coordinate bench, which noted specific allegations of firing on the …

Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dhananjay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and illegal possession of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act. A previous bail application was rejected by a coordinate bench, which also directed the lower …

Vishal Paswan @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vishal Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR alleged that he, along with co‑accused, lured a victim to a litchi orchard, snatched his gold chain and assaulted him with a lathi, danda and iron rod, causing multiple grievous head injuries. The offences alleged were under …

Brajesh Sahani @ Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Brajesh Sahani sought anticipatory bail in a case where he was accused of kidnapping and attempting to marry a minor, alleged under IPC sections 363, 366A/34 and POCSO Act sections 8 and 12. The prosecution alleged that the minor daughter of a complainant went missing and was allegedly enticed for …

Ajay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Ajay Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging illegal sand mining, gang firing, and possession of cartridges, with charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 120(B) and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution’s informant claimed Singh was part of a gang that …

Brajendra Kumar @ Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants, including Brajendra Kumar and others, were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge on 15 October 2025. The State opposed the bail, …

Shambhu MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shambhu Mukhiya, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bihra P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused attempted to seize land, leading to a scuffle in …

Binjay PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Binjay Pandey, was arrested on 2 July 2025 in connection with a case arising from a land dispute, alleged to have assaulted an informant’s brother with a spade and other weapons, leading to charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner pleaded clean …

Vikash Kumar @ DonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 399/402 of the IPC and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, after co‑accused persons named him as a participant in a planned crime. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the statements of the co‑accused and the …

Md. Golden @ Md. Sarfraz AlamversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, three brothers, were charged under Sections 498A and 232 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting a complainant over a dowry demand. Petitioners No.2 and No.3 applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of specific allegations, no criminal record, and that the complainant's …

Anup Yadav @ Anup Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anup Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences arising from an alleged assault during a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others …

Bechan SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bechan Sah, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case (Chakai PS Case No. 336 of 2023) involving alleged possession of 775.8 litres of illicit foreign liquor recovered from a pick‑up van. The prosecution charged him under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 272 …

Ashutosh Kumar @ Aashutosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashutosh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 414 IPC concerning the recovery of a stolen motorcycle. His name appeared only in the confessional statements of co-accused Md. Ashik and Md. Shahid Raza, and he claimed no prior knowledge of the case. The …

Amit Kumar Paswan @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Amit Kumar Paswan applied for bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a case (Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 05 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 366(a) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abducting a girl. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated …

Babul SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Babul Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2017 case (PS No. 38) concerning alleged theft of high‑tension wire, charged under Sections 379, 411, 413 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Sharma and others cut and stole the wire from an electrical tower. …

Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault on an informant’s family and charged under several IPC sections including 354(b), 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307 and 379. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the FIR contains only a …

Gopal YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gopal Yadav applied for bail in a case (Kotwali P.S. Case No.467 of 2013) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Medical Service Institution and Person Protection Act, alleged to have assaulted doctors, nurses and hospital staff. The prosecution’s FIR named five …

Madan RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Madan Ram and Durgesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting the husband of an informant with an iron rod. The petitioners argued that the incident stemmed from a quarrel …

Saurav Kumar @ Saurav YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Saurav Kumar and Gaurav Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (Gogri P.S. Case No. 364 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302, 120B IPC and several provisions of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the informant’s son was killed by …

Chandan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Rai, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a Mahila Police Station case (No. 95 of 2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 376AB, 511, 509 of the IPC and multiple sections of the POCSO Act. The FIR, lodged on 6 December 2022, alleged that the petitioner …

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Lakhisarai PS Case No. 898 of 2021) involving alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 509 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others looted and assaulted an …

Aasif Ali @ Saddam Hussain @ SadamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aasif Ali, was arrested on 10 October 2025 in connection with a 2021 FIR alleging assault, attempted murder and theft under IPC sections 323, 324, 307 and 379. He sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the allegations against him were false and unsupported by the FIR. The …

Rambabu Paswan @ RambabuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rambabu Paswan sought anticipatory bail after learning of his possible arrest in a case involving the seizure of 448.45 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. The prosecution alleged violations of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and several sections of the Indian Penal Code. …

Hasan Ansari @ Hasana Ansari @ Md. HasanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Hasan Ansari, was arrested in connection with Bahadurganj Police Station Case No.143 of 2011, which alleged offences under Sections 365, 366, 372 and 498/34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the alleged abduction of a complainant’s wife by Md. Mojib. The petitioner contended that …

Gangia DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gangia Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased, was implicated in a dowry‑death case (Sections 304B, 120B, 364, 34 IPC) and feared arrest. She contended that the allegations were general, without any specific overt act attributed to her, and that she had no criminal antecedent. The State …

Ravi Gupta @ Ravi Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Ravi Gupta applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case (Raxaul PS Case No. 286 of 2025) involving alleged assault over a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that Gupta, along with others, committed offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, …

Karu Raut @ Karu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Karu Raut sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Ariyari P.S. Case No. 326 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 307 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others fired indiscriminately, while the …

Fuldeo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Fuldeo Yadav, was implicated in a First Information Report alleging that he assaulted an informant with an axe during a petty dispute over cattle trespass, causing a simple injury. He faced charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, …

Md. Rehan @ Rihan @ Md. RihanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, five men from Araria, were arrested in connection with a land‑dispute‑related assault case (Sikty P.S. Case No.100 of 2024) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. They argued that the FIR was omnibus, no specific allegation linked them to the injuries, …

Anant Kumar @ Anant Kumar RaushanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anant Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he abducted the minor daughter of informant Sunita Devi and had sexual intercourse with her, invoking sections 365, 366A, 376 of the IPC, sections 4(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act and section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The …

Ganga YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ganga Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (IPC Sections 365 and 34) registered as Tarabari P.S. Case No. 63 of 2017. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that the police investigation had exonerated him, submitting a final form which the lower …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, feared arrest in a kidnapping case (Sections 363, 366, 34 IPC) registered at Karjain Police Station. The prosecution alleged that he abducted the victim girl, while the petitioner contended he is innocent, having married the victim and fathered a child with her. Counsel …

Ram Sundar Prasad @ Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ram Sundar Prasad, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging dowry harassment under IPC Section 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The FIR alleged that after a love marriage, the petitioner and co‑accused tortured the complainant for dowry. The petitioner …

Kunal Kumar @ Kunal Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Kunal Kumar, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code—including rape, wrongful restraint, hurt, assault on a woman, insult, and intimidation—as well as sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, for allegedly misbehaving with a 16‑year‑old girl and recording the incident. …

Bimlesh Kumar @ Bimlesh PanditversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bimlesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a complaint (Case No. 786 of 2024) alleged his involvement in offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 498A, 307, 504 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, accusing him of assaulting and torturing his wife. The petitioner claimed innocence, a …

Wakil SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (Kanti PS Case No. 215 of 2024) registered under sections 304B and 34 of the IPC. The deceased, their daughter‑in‑law, died by hanging after being taken to a …

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vijay Kumar and Yogendra Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Dhangai P.S. Case No. 17 of 2020) that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dian Act. The High Court …

Dilip Sahani @ Nitesh Ji @ Dilip Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilip Sahani, who was arrested in connection with a 2017 case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 121, 121(a), 120(b)), the Arms Act, the Explosive Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

Shivan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shivan Mandal and his two wives Rina Devi and Rinki Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Tikapatti PS Case No. 88 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They argued that no criminal processes had …

Balram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Balram Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 307, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, involving a violent assault on an informant. The FIR described the accused entering the informant’s house armed …

Ranjan Kumar @ Ravindra yadav @ Ravinder KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, sought bail for offences under Sections 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code arising from an alleged extortion attempt on a road construction site. The prosecution alleged that armed men threatened the workers and demanded a levy, leading to the filing of an FIR against …

Anmol Das @ Ampo DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Anmol Das applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in PS Srinagar Case No.86 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and Arms Act sections 25(9) and 27. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserted that the police investigation had exonerated him and …

Bachu Kumar @ Bachchu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bachu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with PS Udwantnagar case No.571 of 2022, which alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and 409 for defalcating public funds. The prosecution’s case rested on a letter from a Panchayat …

Sikinder MaliversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sikinder Mali, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 313 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 327, 324, 325, 387, 379, 504 and 354(b) of the Indian Penal Code. He had previously applied for regular bail, which was …

Gudiya Khatoon @ Ruksana KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gudiya Khatoon, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (Sugauli P.S. Case No. 260 of 2024) under Sections 304B and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that she, along with family members, tortured and killed the deceased for dowry …

Babloo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Babloo Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Atri P.S. Case No. 424 of 2023) involving alleged murder, assault, and unlawful assembly under IPC sections 302, 504, 506 and 34. The prosecution alleged that a land irrigation dispute led the accused, including …

Arvind SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Arvind Sharma and Ajay Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Atri P.S. Case No. 424 of 2023) alleging murder, assault, and criminal conspiracy under Sections 302, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that a land irrigation dispute led the accused, …

Sonu Singh @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Singh, was arrested in connection with a police case (No. 133 of 2024) for allegedly firing on an informant and police personnel, offences alleged under Sections 353 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended …

Habib SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Habib Sah was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of Najma Khatoon, the aunt of an informant, following an assault by Azad Sah. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, highlighted a 12‑day delay in filing the FIR, and pointed out that a prior …

Md. Farhan Alam @ Farhan AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Farhan Alam, was arrested under a police case alleging offences under Sections 353 and 224 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a pistol. He claimed that he was unconscious due to an accident, was treated at hospitals in …

Rambabu Sharma @ Rambabu Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Rambabu Sharma and Jiuat Sharma, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a police case (No. 450 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and rioting. The informant claimed that Rambabu assaulted him with a gandasa, while Jiuat …

Hare Ram SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Hare Ram Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 25(1)(a), 25(1)(b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, based on a raid that uncovered materials for manufacturing arms. The informant, Mukesh Kumar, alleged that during the raid a person tried to escape …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Yadav @ BheraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a violent incident on 17 February 2024 in which 14 accused allegedly ambushed a man, fired gunshots, inflicted knife injuries and assaulted the victim's family. The prosecution alleges the petitioner participated, but the defence argues …

Sahdev SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sahdev Singh, sought bail in a case registered in 2008 under Sections 498(A), 304(B), 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging dowry‑related cruelty and murder of Babita Kumari. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed and her body cremated, implicating …

Pankaj Kumar Sharma @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Sharma, was implicated in a police case (No.338 of 2022) alleging offences under several IPC sections (341, 342, 344, 323, 386, 387, 420, 120(B)/34) and Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. He was said to be a member of an interview committee that took money …

Bibi Kunti @ Kumni @ KumaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, who are relatives of a missing woman, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A and 365 of the Indian Penal Code alleging torture for dowry. The FIR alleges that the petitioners tortured the informant’s daughter, who is now …