Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 10401–10600
The appellants Bipin Rai and Manoj Rai were convicted under Sections 307, 448 (read with 34) of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on an informant at a village chabutra. The prosecution relied on the informant’s testimony and several witnesses, but the defence highlighted …
Amar Nath filed an application to quash the order of cognizance dated 12‑11‑2014 in a case arising from a tenancy dispute. The petitioner alleged that the FIR and subsequent criminal charges under IPC sections 341, 323 and 504 were filed by the tenant, Smt. Arti, to exert pressure in a civil …
The petitioners, Pradeep Kumar and Vishwanath Kumar, were named in an FIR for offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have purchased land through impersonation of an informant. They contended that they were bona‑fide purchasers, that the …
The petitioner, a rice mill proprietor, challenged the order dated 10‑12‑2018 that took cognizance of an FIR alleging cheating, forgery and violation of Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act (ECA) in connection with the seizure of a truck carrying rice. The prosecution claimed the rice was …
The appellant, a minor girl, was allegedly taken away by the respondent Jitendra Kumar (Kunkun) without parental consent. The trial court convicted the respondent under Section 363 of the IPC and sentenced him to four years’ rigorous imprisonment, acquitting him of other charges including Section 12 …
The petitioner, Nirbhay Kumar, was implicated in a kidnapping‑for‑ransom case (Section 364A/34 IPC) based solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused. No incriminating material was recovered from him and the victim, after being rescued, did not identify him, naming only three other persons. …
The appellants appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged caste‑based assault, robbery and injury. The informant alleged that on 22‑02‑2025 the appellants, along with …
The petitioner, Awanish Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife by poisoning and concealment of her body. He claimed innocence, stating that the body was not recovered and that the death could have …
The appellant Ramesh Singh was convicted by a Fast‑Track Sessions Court for assaulting the daughter of an informant under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to two years’ rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the appellant contended that the prosecution evidence was riddled with …
The petitioners, Vikash Kumar Singh and Birendra Kumar, filed an application to quash the order of cognizance dated 27‑04‑2019 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, which was based on FIR allegations of assault, robbery, and threat with a pistol. They contended that the FIR was false, …
The petitioner, Ashish Saha, filed an application seeking quashal of FIR No. 84/2019 dated 24-03-2019 registered at Bahadurganj Police Station for offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that the petitioner, along with four armed persons, had molested, restrained, …
The appellant, Devendra Sah, appealed a conviction under IPC section 304B and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, for which he was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment and a fine. He filed an interlocutory application seeking suspension of the sentence and release on bail pending the appeal. The …
Rakesh Giri petitioned to quash the order dated 08.08.2018 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate that took cognizance of offences under IPC s.307 read with s.120B and Arms Act s.27. The prosecution had lodged three FIRs for the same incident, alleging that Giri conspired to murder an informant. Giri …
Petitioners Kundan Kumar and others sought to quash a July 1, 2019 order of cognizance taken by a Judicial Magistrate under several IPC sections and the Arms Act in a land‑dispute case. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners threatened and assaulted Sanju Devi with weapons and that Kundan …
The petitioners, four former teachers, filed an application to quash the order of cognizance dated 24‑06‑2019 taken by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in a case alleging forgery of their experience certificates under IPC sections 420/34, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The FIR was based on …
The petitioners filed an application seeking to quash the order of cognizance dated 1 July 2019 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Masaurhi, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 307, 504 and Arms Act section 27 in connection with a …
Pawan Manjhi was arrested in connection with a murder case where the FIR alleged that fifteen accused, including him, assaulted the deceased, with one co‑accused using an axe and the petitioner allegedly brandishing a pistol. The petitioner pleaded that he is innocent, did not assault the deceased …
The petitioner, Sumant Kumar, was named in a 2018 complaint alleging violation of Section 420 of the IPC for failing to return a loan of Rs. 4 lakh allegedly given for a truck purchase. The petitioner contended that the actual loan amount was Rs. 70,000, which had already been repaid before the …
The petitioner, Md. Ejaj, was named in a complaint (Case No. 285 of 2023) alleging cruelty under Section 498-A IPC and assault under Section 323 IPC for demanding a dowry of Rs. 2 lakh and a motorcycle. He applied for bail, arguing that the dowry demand allegation was vague and omnibus, making the …
The appellants, three residents of Gorhiyari Saidpur, were charged under several IPC offences and sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. After a superficial police investigation, the police submitted a final report exonerating them, but the …
The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law, sister‑in‑law of the complainant and an unrelated woman, filed a petition to quash a summons issued under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint alleged that the husband’s family demanded …
The petitioner, Kumar Yashwant Singh, was named in an FIR under several IPC sections for allegedly being involved in a forged sale deed concerning land in Bhagalpur. He contended that he was merely a witness and not a beneficiary of any fraudulent transaction, asserting that the matter was …
The petitioner Jogendra Ravidas filed an application in 2019 seeking to quash a 2010 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabhua, which had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 324 and 342. The petition was filed after an inordinate delay. The Patna High Court, after hearing …
The petitioner, Chotan Paswan, sought bail in a case registered as Amas P.S. Case No. 02 of 2022 for offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging robbery and assault. The prosecution alleged that four unknown persons assaulted an informant and snatched a motorcycle, mobile phone, …
Mukesh Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 272, 273, 414, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where he is alleged to be linked to the recovery of 1,575 litres of liquor from five motorcycles. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the …
The petitioner, Bhagat Mahato, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the recovery of 63.50 litres of liquor from his Hyundai car. He argued that …
The petitioner, Radheshyam, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 414 and 34 and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a) and 41(i) concerning the alleged recovery of 4,473 litres of liquor from a truck. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and is …
The petitioner, Ramchandra Mahto, filed an application under the inherent jurisdiction of the Patna High Court seeking to quash the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑II, Samastipur, which had rejected his request to cancel the bail bonds of accused Nos. 2‑4. The petitioner alleged …
Kamli Devi filed a complaint alleging that her husband was brutally assaulted by several accused on 12 March 2017, leading to his death. The Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Sheohar took cognizance of the offences under Sections 341, 323, 302, 504 and 34 IPC against all named accused and scheduled …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, sought bail in a case (Mirganj PS Case No. 151 of 2016) involving alleged offences under Sections 47(a) and 47(g) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 272, 273 and 420 of the IPC, where 12.600 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from him on a bus. …
The petitioner, Sintu Patel, was arrested on 14 August 2025 in connection with a 2018 incident alleged under IPC sections 448, 341, 323, 326, 307 read with 34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with co‑accused Nitish Kumar, assaulted an informant, shot …
Petitioner Pawan Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail in 2026 for offences alleged in a 2016 FIR, including sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 of the IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act. The State opposed, arguing that the application was filed after a ten‑year delay with no satisfactory …
The petitioners, Sultan Rain and his wife Bahisa Khatoon, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several IPC offences, including assault with a deadly weapon. The prosecution alleged that on 14 June 2024 the petitioners assaulted an informant with an axe after a dispute …
Abren Kumar, a juvenile aged under eighteen, was charged with murder under IPC sections 302/34 and the Arms Act section 27. He had been detained since September 2022. The appellant sought bail, invoking the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, arguing that bail is a rule for …
The petitioner, Dilip Kumar, was arrested in connection with a 2017 case involving alleged possession of arms and related offences under the Arms Act, IPC and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that no weapon was found on his person and that …
The petitioners, Surujwa Devi, Mannu Mahto and Lokesh Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault, kidnapping and murder. The FIR alleges that they assaulted two Natis of the informant and abducted the informant’s …
Rupesh Yadav filed a petition seeking pre‑arrest bail after the police registered a case against him under sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Yadav, together with co‑accused, demanded a cigarette from an informant, assaulted him with a …
The petitioners, Deepak Yadav and Rajesh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2013 for offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 504, 34 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged apprehension of arrest, but the alleged incident involved them assaulting an informant with a …
Manoj Sahani sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) alleging possession of 5 litres of liquor and 5,000 litres of raw Jawa Mahua. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in the act, nothing …
Pappu Yadav was arrested on 18 October 2024 in connection with a 2020 FIR alleging that he fired at an informant with intent to kill, invoking IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and Arms Act section 27. The petitioner contended that the FIR was fabricated, no injury occurred, and he …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that all accused, including the petitioners, assaulted the informant's son, causing multiple injuries, one of which was …
Lorik Yadav applied for pre‑arrest bail after learning that he was likely to be arrested in a case under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that two stolen cars, seized by an informant, were used by the accused to transport illegal liquor, and that Yadav's name surfaced …
Raj Kumar, a proprietor of a godown in Patna, faced an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 285, 427 and 436 of the IPC after a fire broke out in his godown, damaging a neighbouring residence. He contended that the fire was accidental, no loss of life occurred, and the neighbour had not filed a …
Mahendra Yadav petitioned for bail in a case registered under multiple offences including sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353 and 120(b) of the IPC, several provisions of the Arms Act, the Explosive Substances Act and the UAPA. The prosecution alleged that he was named by a police informant as one of …
The petitioner, Kamendra Yadav, was arrested in September 2025 in connection with a dowry death case (FIR dated 04.06.2025) alleged under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, corresponding to IPC sections 304(B) and 34. He contended that the FIR was fabricated, he was not …
Vajid @Bhura Ikram Kureshi, arrested on 20‑Dec‑2023, was charged under multiple IPC offences, the Arms Act and the Gujarat Police Act for an alleged armed robbery and assault. He applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming false implication and …
The appellant, Parulben Mahendrabhai Godani, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, for murder, grievous hurt, robbery, and criminal conspiracy based on Sections 302, 326, 394, 201, 120(B) IPC and Section 135 Gujarat Police Act. She appealed under Section 374 CrPC, contending that …
The applicant‑accused Karanbhai sought to quash FIR No.11193034240308 filed under Section 107 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging abetment of suicide of his girlfriend. The deceased had left a suicide note indicating distress over family opposition, with no allegation of direct …
Savanbhai Vaghela was preventively detained on 15‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that there was no material showing any disturbance to public …
Vishalbhai @ D Bharatbhai Chauhan was preventively detained on 22‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate, Bhavnagar under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that …
Sanjanbhai was preventively detained on 15‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate of Bhavnagar under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his cousin, arguing that no material showed any …
Noorjaha, detained under a preventive detention order dated 22‑12‑2025 pursuant to Section 2(bbb) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘cruel person’, challenged the order through a petition filed by her brother. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before …
The appellant Qamrul Islam was convicted under Section 304A IPC for the death of Indra Bahadur Singh, who was pushed by a constable and fell under the rear wheel of the appellant's truck. The prosecution alleged that the driver’s rash or negligent driving caused the death. Evidence showed the truck …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 1824 of 2022 (Afreen Begum v. Mohd. Lukman) which alleged offences under Sections 323, 504 and 354 IPC. The complaint arose out of a property dispute and the magistrate had earlier rejected …
The applicants, Abhishek Mishra and another, were charged under IPC sections 363, 366 and 120B following an FIR lodged by Rajesh D. Souja on 1 March 2023. While the criminal case was pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar, the parties, including the victim, entered into an …
The petitioner, Gaurav Mendiratta, sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered alleging that 341.28 litres of liquor were recovered from a car he owned, invoking Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016‑18. He contended …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, was arrested in connection with Baisi Police Station Case No. 260 of 2020 for alleged offences under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, after 3,084.12 litres of liquor were recovered from a …
Arjun Mahto was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 300 litres of Nepali liquor, violating Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution’s evidence consisted of the liquor recovered from the house of a …
Ashwani Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in connection with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Dowry Prohibition Act arising from a marital dispute. He offered a one‑time settlement of Rs 13,00,000 to his wife and agreed to return her almirah, seeking to resolve the matter …
The petitioner, Sobha Devi, sought release of her residential house that had been seized under IPC sections 272 and 273 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016 in connection with a criminal case. The State had issued an order on 14‑10‑2022 directing confiscation and auction of …
Baccha Prasad Ray, a former Charged Amin in the Bihar Road Construction Department, was accused under IPC sections 364 and 34 in 2006 and retired in 2015 while the case was pending. He was exonerated in 2019 and subsequently sought regularization and pension benefits, filing a representation that …
The petitioner, Ram Subhodh Choudhary, filed an application to quash the order dated 16.05.2018 in which a Judicial Magistrate took cognizance against him under IPC sections 406, 420 read with 34, based on a complaint by Dinanath Chaudhary alleging breach of a partnership agreement, non‑payment of …
The petitioner, Lalu Kumar Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged kidnapping and assault of an 18‑year‑old student, alleged to have been taken to Nepal and beaten. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code specifically implicated the petitioner and a …
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Sahu, was implicated in a criminal case (CR No. 384 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 324, 504 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, based on a complaint of dowry demand of Rs. 1 lakh and alleged physical and knife assault. The petitioner …
Shankar Ram, the petitioner, sought to quash a magistrate's order of cognizance dated 01‑12‑2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 363 and 366(A) and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He argued that he was merely the uncle of the main accused and had no role in the alleged crime. …
The petitioner, Dipesh Kumar, was accused in a case registered under Sections 326(A) and 307 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly throwing petrol and an ignited matchstick on an informant, causing grievous burns. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, claiming he was falsely implicated due to …
Dr. Shashi Shekhar Singh was named in a complaint (No. 2367 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 323 and 498A, claiming cruelty for non‑payment of dowry demands. The petitioner argued that the complaint was false, arising from domestic differences, and sought bail. The wife opposed bail, …
The petitioners, four members of the same family, were implicated in a FIR for offences under Sections 420, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleged to have refused to marry the informant's daughter due to a dowry demand. The petitioners contended that no …
The petitioner sought quashing of an FIR filed in 2019 alleging sexual assault, pregnancy, and related offences under IPC, the SC/ST (POA) Act and the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, initially said to be about 16, was later shown by a medical report to be 18-19 years old, and the parties had married …
The appellants Jawahir Singh and Chandrama Singh were convicted under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting a neighbour, Sitaram Singh, over a dispute concerning a public lane. The prosecution relied on the testimony of six eyewitnesses and a medical report, but the witnesses …
The petitioner, a Circle Officer, filed an application to quash a magistrate's order that took cognizance of offences under Sections 427 and 504 IPC for demolishing an encroachment allegedly targeting the complainant's ancestral house. The petitioner argued that the action was taken in his official …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 508 and 34 of the IPC. The parties reached a compromise, with the petitioner agreeing to pay a total of Rs. 13 lakh in installments to the complainant. The court directed a payment schedule of Rs. 2 …
The petitioner, Md. Danish, was arrested in connection with a criminal case alleging cruelty, dowry harassment, and assault under various IPC provisions and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations were vague and that he intended to dissolve his marriage, offering to pay Rs. …
The appellants were convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 498A/34 and 306/34 of the IPC based on the informant's claim that his sister was driven to suicide by dowry‑related cruelty inflicted by the appellants. On appeal, the High Court examined the testimony of the informant …
The petitioner, Sunil Sahani, was arrested in connection with a case of kidnapping and alleged sexual offences involving the 2½‑year‑old daughter of an informant. The prosecution alleges that on 23‑11‑2023 he, along with a co‑accused, abducted the child with the intention of selling her, and charges …
The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and husband of the complainant, sought to quash criminal proceedings filed under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 504, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act relating to alleged dowry harassment. The complainant (OP No.2) had …
The petitioner, Nandkishore Mahto, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Ballia P.S. Case No. 28 of 2020) involving alleged shooting of an informant's husband. He faces charges under IPC Sections 302, 307, 120(B) read with Section 34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended …
Vijay Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based on information that a group of miscreants planned an offence, and co‑accused who were apprehended …
The petitioner, Nagmani Singh, was charged with murder under Sections 302 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting his father. The petitioner applied for regular bail, arguing that the prosecution's witnesses were hearsay and that the forensic …
The Patna High Court heard bail applications of Dashrat Mahto, Suresh Mahto and Sunil Mahto, accused in a 2014 case involving murder, attempted murder, robbery and the use of explosives and firearms. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the victim, hurled bombs, fired at him and stole …
The petitioners, Dashrat Mahto and his brothers Suresh and Sunil, applied for bail in a case arising from a 2014 incident in Jamui where the deceased Niraj Singh was allegedly assaulted, bombed, shot, and robbed by a group of accused including the petitioners. The prosecution, based on the …
The petitioner, Md. Shadab Khan, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Section 365 of the IPC, later amended to include Sections 302, 120B and 34. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was implicated based solely on the confessional statement of a co-accused, with no …
The petitioner, Md. Dawloo, applied for bail in a criminal case involving alleged theft of petroleum from Indian Oil pipelines, charged under Sections 379, 411, 427, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, Sections 15 and 16 of the Petroleum and Minerals …
The petitioner, Md. Dawloo, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged theft of petroleum from Indian Oil pipelines, charged under Sections 379 and 511 of the IPC and Section ¾ of the Prevention of Damage to Property Act. He claimed innocence, asserting that his name surfaced only because …
The petitioner, Suresh Nat, was implicated in a case (Thawe P.S. Case No. 11 of 2024) for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a police raid recovered a pistol from a co‑accused but nothing from him. He contended that he …
The petitioner, Mohammad Abzal, was charged under IPC Sections 376 (rape) and 506/34 (criminal intimidation) for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with the victim under the pretext of marriage, impregnating her, and then refusing to marry. The victim claimed the relationship was …
The petitioner, Lalan Das, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code arising from the disappearance and death of the informant’s son. The trial court had examined four of six charge‑sheeted witnesses, with two remaining, …
The petitioners – Suraj Kumar and Sunaina Devi in one case and Anandev Mahto and Shanti Devi in another – were named in an FIR relating to offences under Sections 498‑A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have assisted the main accused in the death of the informant’s sister. They contended …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar Thakur, was named in an FIR (Palasi P.S. Case No. 122 of 2024) for alleged kidnapping, assault and related offences under several IPC sections. He contended that the allegations, including the use of a knife, were false and that the FIR was filed three days after a …
The Patna High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed by Suraj Kumar and Sunaina Devi (and separately by Anandev Mahto and Shanti Devi) who were named in an FIR for offences under Sections 498‑A and 302 IPC relating to the alleged death of a woman in Neemchak Bathani. The …
The petitioner, Gabbu Miya, was charged under sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) of the IPC and sections 3 and 5 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act for allegedly possessing a mobile phone and a knife after a police check. He claimed innocence, arguing that nothing was found in his conscious …
The petitioner, Nadim Sahil, was arrested in a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act alleging cruelty, dowry demands, assault and abandonment of his wife, Masooma Khatun. The petitioner denied all allegations but offered to pay a temporary monthly …
The petitioners, who are the mother, father, sister and brother of the accused Chandan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They alleged that the complainant had a consensual …
Shailesh Kumar was arrested on 1 August 2024 in connection with a kidnapping case (Pauthu PS Case No. 93 of 2022) under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, abducted the informant's daughter. The petitioner sought bail after the …
Hari Kishore Rai was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 3,492 litres of liquor from a truck, alleged to violate several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating …
Rohit Ranjan Kumar (Prem Kumar) was named in a complaint (Case No. 363 of 2022) alleging cruelty under Section 498-A of the IPC for demanding a dowry of a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that the marriage had been estranged since 2019, the complainant refused to resume cohabitation, and she had …
Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged possession of 12.96 litres of whisky and 18 litres of country-made liquor, alleged to be offences under Sections 272, 273, 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that …
The petitioners, Ragani Kumari and Raju Devi, were arrested in connection with an FIR (PS‑67/2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34. They contend they have clean antecedents, are women, and were falsely implicated because the FIR specifically names Santosh and …
Manjula Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273 and 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of liquor recovered from her house, which is a joint family property. She argued she …
Vivek Sahni applied for bail in a case registered under Section 414 of the IPC and Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act, where 2 kg of charas, mobile phones and cash were seized from a four‑wheeler in which he was allegedly present. The petitioner claimed he was neither the owner nor the …
Shashi Kumar Singh applied for bail in a case registered under Section 414 IPC and Sections 8(C), 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act, where a search of a four‑wheeler yielded 2 kg of charas, mobile phones and cash, and the petitioner was found seated in the vehicle. The petitioner contended that he …
Bikash Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder, rape and evidence‑tampering case (IPC §§376, 302, 201) and has been in custody since 17 July 2025. He contended that he is innocent, was in judicial custody elsewhere on the date of the alleged offence, and was implicated only because he is a …
The petitioner, Raju Kumar Manjhi, was implicated in a kidnapping (Sec. 363 IPC) and criminal intimidation (Sec. 366 IPC) case based on an FIR filed on 1 June 2022 concerning an alleged incident on 4 November 2021. He contended that he has a clean record, the allegation was false, and the FIR was …
Mukesh Paswan was arrested on 22 July 2025 in connection with a 2020 murder case (PS Harsidhi Case No. 250) where the deceased was set on fire. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused poured kerosene and ignited the victim, while Paswan was said only to have held the deceased. Paswan, who has a …
The petitioner, Saryug Chaudhary, was arrested on 10 October 2025 in connection with a 2002 case involving offences under Sections 323, 325 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. He had earlier been granted bail in December 2002, appeared regularly until November 2019, after which he failed to appear and …
The petitioners sought to quash a 11‑April‑2017 order in which a Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance under IPC Section 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against all accused in complaint No. 3081(C) of 2016. Petitioners 3 and 4, the brother and sister‑in‑law of the …
The petitioner, Md. Astak Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) after a bag containing cash and documents was stolen. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but during investigation a co-accused, Mantajir Alam, gave a confessional statement that implicated the petitioner, …
The petitioners, Rajesh Kumar, Meena Devi and Birju Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 354A, 504 and 34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting an informant and snatching a silver chain. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Mahto, was arrested in connection with an alleged assault on an informant involving a lathi, iron rod and daab, leading to a head injury. He faced charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34. The petitioner contended that the FIR was vague, the injury …
The petitioners, Radhe Shyam Mukhiya and Sanjay Poddar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Singhiya PS Case No. 166 of 2025) involving the alleged possession of 152.640 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Indian Penal Code. They argued that they were falsely implicated, were neither …
Ram Nath Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint (Case No. 231 of 2023) alleging offences under several IPC sections for allegedly receiving Rs.1.5 lakh from the complainant for a land sale that was later found to be already sold, leading to an assault on the complainant. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Md. Shafique, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault, intimidation and disrobing of the informant's family, with charges under several IPC sections. He claimed innocence, asserting the dispute was petty and the injuries were simple, and he had a clean antecedent. The State opposed …
The petitioners filed an application invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to quash an order dated 28 July 2025, wherein the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑II, Nawada, had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code against them. They alleged …
Nilam Devi, the wife of the late Makai Nat, was charged with multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault, attempt to murder, and causing death of an informant. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, fearing arrest in the case. The court examined the seriousness of the …
Pappu Rai was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 250 litres of liquor, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, had no incriminating material in his …
The petitioner, Suman Kumar Mahato, was implicated in a case (Sahebganj P.S. No. 97 of 2024) alleging illegal possession of 3,615 litres of liquor recovered from six vehicles, under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the …
Vibek Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after liquor and spirit were recovered, part of which was allegedly found in his hut. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no …
The petitioner, Srikant Rai, was charged under Sections 30(a), (c), (d) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly possessing 220 litres of liquor recovered from six jute bags and a motorcycle. The prosecution alleged that the liquor …
Bhajo Yadav (Ramesh Yadav) was arrested in connection with a 2020 case involving murder under Sections 307, 302/34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. The prosecution alleged that he and co‑accused hurled bombs at an informant’s husband, resulting in death and injury. …
Manorma Devi, an ASHA worker, was implicated in a murder case (IPC Sections 304/34) after a woman she was transporting to a hospital died during delivery. The informant alleged that she, along with others, caused the death. The petitioner contended she had no involvement and that no material on …
Amarjeet Rai applied for anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged alleging that he, along with a co‑accused, conspired to defraud a partnership, obtain bank loans fraudulently and misappropriate partnership assets, offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner …
Shubham Kumar Singh was arrested in Sakri Police Station case No.76 of 2024 for alleged offences under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, after 953.640 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that he had no …
Kedar Rathod was convicted for kidnapping (IPC s.363), assault (s.365) and rape (s.376) of a girl aged about four years. The trial court relied primarily on the child’s testimony, supported by medical findings of genital injuries, and sentenced him to seven years for kidnapping and assault and life …
The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) filed a complaint alleging a gold‑smuggling conspiracy involving several accused, including Mahmed Rizvanbhai Aiyubbhai Limbada, under IPC sections 174 and 175 read with Customs Act section 108. The accused were intercepted with large quantities of gold …
The applicant, Satyanarayan Tarachand Jaju, filed a revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 challenging the trial court’s refusal to discharge him in a PMLA case alleging his involvement in a bank‑fraud and money‑laundering scheme. The prosecution case …
Mahendrakumar challenged his detention as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, arguing that the Police Commissioner had no material to show a disturbance of public order. The State contended that he was a habitual offender and his activities threatened …
Kevalbhai Kishorbhai Sondarva was preventively detained on 15‑12‑2025 by the Commissioner of Police, Rajkot, under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that no …
Naresh Mahendrabhai Pruthviraj Meena was preventively detained on 12‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his relative, arguing that no material showed any disturbance …
Mohammedfaizan @ Valaa Mohammedaiyub Shaikh challenged a preventive detention order dated 04‑12‑2025 issued by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, alleging he was a "dangerous person". The petitioner argued that no …
Dipakbhai Lalabhai Premabhai Parmar was preventively detained on 11‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his relative, arguing that no material showed any disturbance …
Vishal @ Bhushan Patil was preventively detained on 13‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order …
Mayur Ishvarbhai Nanjibhai Bhat (Barot) was preventively detained on 11‑12‑2025 by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detainee, through his mother, challenged the order alleging no material …
Rakesh Shinde was preventively detained on 15‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material was placed before …
Mahendra Sukhlal Bhanji Kharadi (Meena) was preventively detained on 04‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He filed a petition challenging the detention, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, …
Rahul @ Golden was preventively detained on 13‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under Section 2(ha) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, on the ground that he was a "sexual offender" and his conduct threatened public order. He filed a petition challenging the …
Santoshbhai Natubhai Solanki was preventively detained by the District Magistrate of Bhavnagar under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He filed a special criminal application challenging the detention, arguing that no material was …
Nilesh Rameshbhai Naik was preventively detained on 14‑12‑2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "sexual offender". He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The State contended …
Aadityakumar Dantani was detained on 9 June 2025 under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the order through a petition filed by his mother, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was passed …
Bhaveshbhai Sambhubhai Rabari was preventively detained on 10‑12‑2025 under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his mother, Valiben Rabari, arguing that no material showed any …
Ajay @Ajju @Chor Hiranand Nanakram Raghani was preventively detained on 20‑12‑2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material was placed before the …
Rakesh was preventively detained on 28‑11‑2025 as a “sexual offender” under Section 2(ha) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The State contended …
Adnan @R.C., detained as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 17‑12‑2025. The petitioner argued that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was passed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. for Akash Sharma, who was charged with offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act for alleged cyber‑fraud involving a loss of Rs 3.16 crore. The …
The petitioner, Md. Aman Mojahid Khan, was arrested in connection with a theft of a pick‑up van under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only basis for his involvement was the confessional statement of co‑accused …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought bail in a case (Kadwa P.S. Case No. 172 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 461, 379, 411 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein the prosecution alleged that he participated in a night-time robbery of a shop. The petitioner contended that he was …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) and Bihar Excise Act sections 30(a)(c)(d) for alleged recovery of 222.5 litres of liquor from a river bank. He argued that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Suman, was facing arrest in a criminal case (Madhepura PS Case No. 482 of 2020) for alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code relating to non‑deposit of Rs. 21,96,357. He had already paid Rs. 7,77,937 and was ready to furnish a demand draft …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 465, 467 and 471 relating to an alleged illegal grabbing of land belonging to his cousin. The petitioner contended that the matter is essentially a civil land dispute, already pending …
Aditya Kumar Dubey applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 498A of the IPC, alleging that the complaint by his wife Champa Kumari was false and stemmed from a matrimonial dispute. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, that the dispute was private, and sought an amicable …
Vikram Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Saraiya Case No. 98 of 2022) under IPC sections 363, 366 and 34. The prosecution alleged that he abducted a girl, but the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated that she had voluntarily eloped with the petitioner. …
The petitioners, six residents of Bhagwanpur, were charged under multiple IPC sections including 307 for allegedly assaulting an informant and damaging property in a land‑related dispute. They contended that the matter was essentially civil and sought pre‑arrest bail, proposing an amicable …
The petitioner, Shashi Shekhar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 406 and 420 IPC alleging failure to refund Rs.3 lakh paid for a cancelled cultural programme. The prosecution alleged criminal breach of trust and cheating, while the petitioner claimed the dispute was …
Raja Babu petitioned for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint filed under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a matrimonial dispute involving a demand for money and alleged cruelty. The petitioner claimed innocence and …
Shams Tabrez applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint filed under IPC Section 498A and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence Act, alleging that the marital dispute was a private matter and that the case was false. The complainant alleged extortion and eviction after marriage, while the …
The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint (No. 826 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 504, 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, filed by his wife Suman Mishra. The wife claimed dowry harassment and that she was thrown out of the house, …
The petitioner, Komal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 239 of 2023 alleging misappropriation of Rs.13,65,900 under IPC sections 420, 406 and 120(B). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a scheme that diverted funds allocated to a Gram Panchayat. The …
The petitioners, three brothers, were implicated in an FIR alleging assault on an informant and his wife over a minor dispute involving a bull. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing a twelve‑day delay in filing the FIR, that the injuries were simple, and that there was no medical report for the …
The petitioners, Farjana Khatoon (mother‑in‑law) and Asma Praween (sister‑in‑law), sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case (Gwalpara P.S. Case No. 151 of 2024) filed under Sections 304B, 498A, 34 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The deceased, an 18‑year‑old woman, was found …
The petitioner, Amit Banik, was implicated in a case (PS‑Bettiah Case No.197 of 2024) alleging that he threatened his wife, leading her to commit suicide on 1 May 2024. The prosecution alleged that Banik, along with other family members, had repeatedly abused and harassed the deceased, and that on …
The petitioner, Sushil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping and ransom case involving the sister of an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, abducted the informant’s sister on 19 July 2023, demanding Rs. 25,000 and jewellery, and …
Prince Paswan, husband of a woman who died under suspicious circumstances, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 498A, 304B, 34 of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleges that Paswan and co‑accused tortured the deceased to extract a …
Chandan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) arising from a complaint that his motorcycle was looted at gunpoint. The petitioner argued that he is not named in the FIR, his name appears only in a co‑accused’s confessional statement, no property has …
Mamta Kumari, the wife of the deceased Alok Kumar Gupta, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under sections 302 and 120(B)/34 of the IPC concerning her husband's death in 2019. The prosecution alleged that she and other family members conspired to murder the deceased, citing a …
The petitioner, Bimlesh Kumar Renu, was implicated in a dowry harassment case (PS Case No.165 of 2021) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The informant claimed mental and physical torture for dowry, while the petitioner contended that the …
Vijay Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a murder and arms case (PS Case No. 140 of 2025) alleging that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was among those fleeing the scene after the killing of Kundan Kumar, based largely on the …
The petitioner, Suman Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 363, 366, 366(A) and 120(B) concerning the alleged kidnapping of a minor girl. The FIR was lodged eleven days after the girl’s disappearance and did not initially name the petitioner as an accused. The …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a kidnapping case under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC based on an FIR alleging he abducted the informant's daughter. He contended that the alleged victim was an adult who voluntarily left her home, entered into a consensual relationship, and later …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 137 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 140(3) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing away a 17‑year‑old girl. The girl, who had gone missing, was later …
The petitioner, Deep Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 419, 420, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have assaulted a woman, stolen her mobile, purse and money. The prosecution’s case is based on a WhatsApp call …
The petitioner, Karan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered on 5 June 2024 for alleged recovery of a pistol and a mobile phone, and charged under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26(1) and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely …
The petitioner, Rahul Ranjan, feared arrest in a case alleging conspiracy to leak the Bihar Excise Police Staff Selection exam paper, with charges under several IPC sections. The prosecution’s case is based on information that co‑accused, apprehended during a raid, named the petitioner in their …
Harilal Sah, a resident of Siwan, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (sections 30(a), 38(i), 41(i)) for the alleged recovery of 2,220.48 litres of liquor from a car and …
Rampukar Singh, accused of demanding rangdari at gunpoint and firing on the informant's son under several IPC sections and the Arms Act, has been in custody since 16 May 2024. He filed a bail petition claiming the FIR allegations are false and fabricated. The State opposed bail, highlighting the …
Vijay Kumar, a school director, was named in a murder and arms case (PS Case No. 140 of 2025) and applied for anticipatory bail. The prosecution alleged that he fled the scene with co‑accused who had confessed to killing the informant's husband, but there was no eye‑witness directly linking Kumar to …
The petitioner, Manager Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 354A, 498A, 504 and 506 relating to alleged dowry harassment. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, tortured the complainant for dowry demands. The …
Harichandra Ram was accused of assaulting the husband of his sister‑in‑law with an iron rod, invoking Sections 341, 323, 324, 354B, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The petitioner claimed the case was false, motivated by a property dispute, and asserted his clean antecedents. The State opposed his …
Ashlok Manjhi, a resident of Goha village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 38 and 42 for allegedly recovering 450 litres of liquor from a tractor. He contended that he was not present at the spot of …
Arvind Kumar was charged under IPC sections 279 and 427 and section 139 of the Bihar Electricity Act, 2003 for allegedly crashing his vehicle into an electric pole, causing damage and a power outage affecting 20 villages and a loss of Rs.3,50,000 to the South Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. He …
Md. Tajuddin was charged with offences under sections 341, 323, 308, 354, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting an informant and her family during a family feud on 19‑06‑2023. He filed a bail petition fearing arrest, contending that the FIR was lodged after an unreasonable delay of more …
The petitioner, Abhi Nandan Kumar Yadav, sought bail in a robbery case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging false implication as his name was not in the FIR but was derived from a co-accused's confession. He had been in custody since 20-09-2025 and possessed four prior criminal …
The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. alleging assault with an iron rod, resulting in grievous injuries and theft of Rs.30,000. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, participated in the assault, while …
The petitioner, Anil Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Gogri P.S. Case No. 364 of 2023) involving alleged firing on the informant's son, resulting in death, and was also charged under the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges he participated in the offence, while the petitioner …
The revision challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had set aside a process issued by the Additional Metropolitan Magistrate in a complaint alleging non‑payment of commission. The complainant alleged that the accused had made false representations regarding payment, but the …
The applicant, Tabrej Sayyad Rahimatulla Sayyad, was convicted under IPC sections 352, 332, 504 and 506, each carrying a maximum simple imprisonment of one year. The Additional Sessions Court had already suspended the sentence during the pendency of the appeal and granted interim bail. The applicant …
The applicant, Sagar Paresh Gosaliya, was convicted under IPC Sections 353 and 332 and sentenced to a short term of imprisonment with fines. The Sessions Court had already suspended the sentence pending appeal and granted interim bail. The applicant filed an interim application seeking further …
The High Court considered the bail application of Subhransh Nayak, accused in a fraud case involving alleged cheating of investors amounting to Rs.1,22,28,031 and charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34, IT Act section 66-D and MPID Act sections 3 and 4. The prosecution argued …
The High Court considered two interim applications seeking enlargement of bail for convicted appellants in a Special (POCSO) case. The appellants were convicted under various IPC and POCSO provisions for sexual offences against a minor who is also mentally disabled. The counsel argued lack of …
The applicant, Chaudhary Abdul Majid Shahadat, filed a criminal complaint alleging cheating under Section 420 of the IPC against M/s Shree Metal Works and others for non-payment of goods supplied on credit. The respondents were charged, sought discharge, and the Additional Sessions Judge discharged …
The applicant was convicted under Section 39 read with Section 44(c) of the Indian Electricity Act for alleged tampering of an electricity meter at premises he was said to occupy. The prosecution’s case relied on a BEST employee’s inspection that found the meter seals broken and the meter running …
The applicant was charged for allegedly hitting a cyclist on 31 March 1999 and was convicted under Section 279 of the IPC and Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act for rash or negligent driving. The trial court found him guilty, and the appellate court upheld the conviction, prompting a revision …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No. 120 of 2023, which involves offences under Sections 354, 354-D, 323, 504, 506, 376 and 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that over four years the applicant, under threat, had forced the victim into sexual …
The applicant, Rasik Upendra Pitale, sought to challenge the Sessions Judge’s order quashing the issuance of process in a defamation case under Section 500 of the IPC. The complaint alleged that the accused, Mahadev Wadatkar et al., had made defamatory statements in police statements, which the …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to obtain the FIR (No. 334 of 2023) and to have it quashed, alleging that the matrimonial dispute with the complainant (Respondent No.2) had been amicably resolved and that she no longer wished to pursue criminal action. Respondent No.2 filed an affidavit …
The State of Maharashtra filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 99‑day delay in filing a leave‑to‑appeal application against an acquittal order dated 2 December 2024 in a murder case (IPC 302). The High Court had issued notice to the respondent, who failed to appear. The Additional …
The applicant filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Court's order refusing to discharge him in a case involving offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act. The revision raised grounds of lack of material to frame charges and the absence …
The appellant, Tulshiram Gopal Manere, was convicted by a Special Judge under Sections 376(n), 323, 354, 506 of the IPC and Sections 6, 5(l)(m), 10, 9(l)(m) of the POCSO Act, receiving multiple terms of rigorous imprisonment and fines. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 1301 of 2019 challenging the …
Madhav Nagnath Cheble was charged with kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 13‑year‑old girl, invoking IPC s.363, BNS ss.64(m) & 65(1) and POCSO ss.4(2), 5(1) & 8. The applicant argued that the girl had eloped with him, lived together for over a year, and that he had no prior record. The prosecution …
The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking discharge after a lower court had refused it. While the revision was pending, the applicant (Accused No.3) was acquitted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, in Sessions Case No.40 of 2010 on 28 October 2021 for offences under Section 313 read …
The appellant, originally accused No.2, was convicted along with two others for dacoity with murder and criminal conspiracy under Sections 396, 397 and 120‑B of the IPC, receiving life imprisonment and a fine. The prosecution’s case rested on the recovery of stolen idols and other articles from the …
The applicants, a company and its directors, were accused by a club member of breaching service promises, leading the complainant to file a criminal complaint alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Metropolitan Magistrate initially dismissed the …
