Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

MD. EJAJ @ AIJAJ @ MD. AJAJversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner as the allegations were deemed general and not sufficient to justify denial of bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Ejaj, was named in a complaint (Case No. 285 of 2023) alleging cruelty under Section 498-A IPC and assault under Section 323 IPC for demanding a dowry of Rs. 2 lakh and a motorcycle. He applied for bail, arguing that the dowry demand allegation was vague and omnibus, making the cruelty charge unconvincing, and that the alleged assault was not proven. The State opposed bail, contending that the petitioner had not complied with a court order for the complainant's rukhsat. The court examined the specificity of the allegations and found them to be general, concluding that there was insufficient basis to deny bail. Consequently, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the allegations under Sections 498-A and 323 IPC are sufficiently specific to deny bail
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the pending complaint

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • dowry harassment
  • cruelty
  • bail
  • IPC 498-A
  • IPC 323
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • general allegations
  • omnibus

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64350 of 2024
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2023 Thana- DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE
                                                   District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 MD. EJAJ @ AIJAJ @ MD. AJAJ Son of Md. Khatibullah @ Khatibur
                 Rahman Resident of village - Dhamwara, P.S.- Alinagar, District - Darbhanga
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Najni Praween Wife of Md. Ejaj D/o Md. Mohiuddin, Resident of village -
                  Dhamsain, P.S.- Alinagar, District - Darbhanga
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr.Nafisu Zzoha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr.Akbar Ali
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   20-01-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is named in the complaint petition

                   and apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint

                   Case No. 285 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 498-A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. The allegation against petitioner is to commit

                   cruelty upon complainant along with other family members for

                   the non-fullfilment of demand of dowry as raised for cash of

                   Rs. 2 lakhs and one motorcycle.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that allegation qua raising demand of

                   dowry is appearing very much general and omnibus in nature

                   and, therefore, the allegation of committing cruelty is also not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64350 of 2024(4) dt.20-01-2026
                                            2/3




          appears convincing qua petitioner. It is submitted that due to

          personal ego, complainant is living with her brother and failed

          to join petitioner, despite his best efforts. It is submitted that

          allegation qua physical assault which alleged to be made with

          an intention to cause death not appears convincing as

          cognizance was taken for the offences under Sections 498-A

          and 323 of the IPC.

                       5 Learned APP duly assisted by learned counsel for

          the informant while opposing the prayer of bail submitted that

          petitioner who is the husband had failed to approach

          complainant in terms of order dated 21.11.2024 for her

          rukhsat.

                        6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

          taking note of fact as allegation qua demand of dowry and

          also of committing cruelty appears very much general and

          omnibus against this petitioner, accordingly petitioner above-

          named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court

          below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released

          on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64350 of 2024(4) dt.20-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                         satisfaction        of      the         learned      J.M.F.C.,   Benipur,

                         Darbhanga/concerned Court, where the case is pending in

                         connection with Complaint Case No. 285 of 2023, subject to

                         the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                         Cr.P.C/ Section 482(2) of BNSS.


                                               (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
S.Tripathi/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.