Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 10201–10400

ADITYA PARTH SARATHY DEYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The father‑son applicants were charged under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B and 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Gujarat Protection of Interest of Depositors Act for allegedly cheating investors of about Rs 2.48 crore. They contended that they had already repaid Rs 1.69 crore to 984 investors and …

Praphul Kumar @ Praful Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Praphul Kumar Jha, was charged under IPC sections 419, 420 and 120B and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly taking Rs.9 lakh as dowry and then refusing to marry or return the money. He sought bail, asserting he would deposit Rs.8.5 lakh in installments within …

Baidhnath Patel @ Baidyanath Patel @ VijayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Baidhnath Patel applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case (FIR No. 271/2024) for allegedly assisting in the cremation of the victim and tampering with CCTV evidence. The petitioner asserted innocence, claiming he only helped co‑accused Rajkumar Rai with …

Dharmvir Kumar @ Dharamvir @ HatteversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmvir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302/34) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the informant's son was shot and later died, implicating the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was …

Ambuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ambuj Kumar, was charged with murder, attempt to murder, conspiracy, and offences under the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a shooting incident in Majorganj. The trial court denied bail, relying on the identification of the appellant by a witness who …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar was arrested in June 2024 and charged under IPC Section 414 and NDPS Act Sections 21(c), 23(c) and 29 for possession of a commercial quantity of codeine syrup. An earlier bail application was rejected, but the petitioner filed a second regular bail petition claiming that no witness had …

Ajay Sahni @ Bhola SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Sahni and Sanjay Sahni were arrested in connection with a theft case (Ali Nagar P.S. Case No. 77 of 2024) alleged under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners argued that they were not named in the FIR and were implicated solely on the basis of a confessional statement …

Pradeep Singh @ Pradip Singh @ Mantu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pradeep Singh, was implicated in a criminal complaint (Case No. 4349(C) of 2018) alleging cheating under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC for failing to execute a sale deed after receiving Rs. 9.6 lakh, while the consideration was Rs. 46 lakh. Singh contended that the amount was paid …

AWADH BIHARI UPADHAYAY @ ABADH BIHARI UPADHAYAYversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Awadh Bihari Upadhyay was arrested in connection with a 2018 complaint alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420 and 406, where he had introduced co‑accused Mani Bhushan Pandey to the complainant Amit Kumar Jha, who was defrauded of Rs 20 lakh on the pretext of a job in …

Md. Ashique @ TamannaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Eight accused were arrested in connection with Babubarahi Police Station Case No.47 of 2024, charged under several IPC sections for assaulting an informant and his family, including an alleged knife attack on the informant's daughter. The petitioners contended that the allegations were vague and …

Rajeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Rajeev Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment complaint (Sections 498A IPC and 4 Dowry Prohibition Act). The prosecution alleged that he and co‑accused tortured the informant for dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that the …

Kajal KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kajal Kumari applied for bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (PS case No. 621 of 2021) involving alleged abduction of a minor under IPC sections 363, 366(A) and 34. The FIR originally named three accused, including Rahul Kumar and his parents, but after the victim returned, her statement under …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akash Kumar, was charged in a complaint case for cruelty, dowry demand of Rs.2 lakh, and physical assault under IPC sections 498A and 313, and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The petitioner contended that no marriage had been solemnised with the complainant, challenging the …

Sujit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar Yadav, was named in a complaint (Case No.1191 of 2022) alleging cruelty under Section 498-A of the IPC for demanding Rs.1 lakh and a motorcycle as dowry. The petitioner contended that the allegations of physical assault and dowry demand were vague and omnibus. The …

ManikversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manik Grover was named in a complaint (Case No. 1562 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC Sections 498A, 379, 120B and Section 3 of the Domestic Violence Act for mental and physical cruelty linked to a purported dowry demand of Rs 40 lakh. The petitioner contended that the demand was a loan, not …

Ankit ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ankit Thakur was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping of a minor girl for marriage, invoking IPC Sections 366A and 363 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting the victim was over 17 and that her initial statement under Section 161 supported him, …

Ashik Kumar @ Ashik SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashik Kumar, was arrested in connection with a 2019 complaint alleging cruelty under IPC sections 498A, 379, 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act for demanding Rs.1 lakh and a motorcycle. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the dowry demand and cruelty allegations were vague, general …

Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anil Kumar was named in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 498-A, 354B, 341, 323, 406, 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging mental and physical cruelty for non‑payment of a dowry demand of Rs. 4 lakh and a four‑wheeler. The alleged incident occurred in 2020, …

Rajesh Ranjan @ Raju SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellant, Rajesh Ranjan (Raju Singh), was charged under several IPC provisions and Section 3(i)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, caste-based abuse, and a land‑related dispute. He contended that he has a clean record and that the complaint is false, arising …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS Case No. 98 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 379 r/w 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, where he is accused of assaulting a victim to demand dowry. The petitioner …

Barkat Ali @ Md. Barkat AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Barkat Ali, was accused under Section 498A of the IPC for alleged mental and physical cruelty related to a dowry demand of Rs. two lakh. The complainant, his wife Nisha, filed the criminal case (C.A. No. 2511 of 2018). Both parties later settled the dispute through a mediation …

Lokesh Giri @ Lokesh Kumar GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Lokesh Giri, was implicated in a case alleging offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant's father with various weapons. He claimed the allegations were false and stemmed from personal enmity, noting that no injury …

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, a municipal employee, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 406 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged defalcation of Rs. 6,65,912. The High Court examined the seriousness of the alleged financial loss and the nature of …

Shadabur RahmanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shadabur Rahman, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 420, 419, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to alleged extortion and forgery of land documents. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner pressured the informant to …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Santosh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a complaint (Case No. 119C of 2023) alleging his involvement in assault, torture, and dowry harassment under IPC sections 323, 341, 504, 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and feared …

Ravi Kumar @ Shashikant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case registered under Section 27 of the Arms Act and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly firing at individuals, causing injuries. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner fired in the air …

Avadesh Ray @ Awadhesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Bipat Rai and Avadesh Ray, filed anticipatory bail applications fearing arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.572 of 2024, which alleged offences of extortion, criminal breach of trust, cheating, false evidence and a provision of the CPC. The prosecution alleged that the …

Santosh GiriversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, a group of seven individuals from Asudhan Ke Mathiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 22 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 126, 351(2) and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that …

Bablu SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Bablu Sah and three others, were charged under several IPC offences and Section 3(1)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his companions and stealing money and a mobile phone. They applied for …

Dheeraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Yadav @ Dheeraj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 941 of 2024) under Sections 498A read with 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and …

RAJ KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Raj Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Section 498A IPC) arising from Complaint No. 1309 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that Raj Kumar and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and filed an application for …

Deepak Kumar Singh @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Piro police case (No. 417 of 2023) involving alleged extortion under IPC sections 386, 387, 504, 506/34. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner demanded ransom, while his counsel argues that the mobile used …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged participation in the removal of a dead body after a dowry‑related death. He was not named in the FIR, and the prosecution’s material did not directly link him to the murder, only to the act of taking away the …

Om Prakash RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 1030 of 2015) alleging offences under IPC Section 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case filed under IPC sections 406, 420, 34 and NI Act section 138 alleging he took construction material worth Rs.11,90,535 and issued a Rs.6,00,000 cheque that later bounced. The petitioner failed to appear at three mediation dates despite interim …

Tokhan sahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tokhan Sah, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged forgery and fraud in the sale of land belonging to the informant, Geeta Devi. The FIR alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34, claiming that co‑accused Krishna Devi forged documents to …

Arun Kumar @ Arun Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arun Kumar Singh applied for pre‑arrest bail in a theft case under Section 395 IPC where the FIR does not name him. The only allegation against him stems from a confessional statement made by co‑accused Manish Kumar Patel, whose evidentiary value is limited. The State opposed the bail, but the court …

Krishnandan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Krishnandan Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Sikandara P.S. Case No. 25 of 2023) that alleged offences under IPC sections 498(a), 323, 307, 504, 379 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted and …

Priyanka KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Priyanka Kumari applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where the informant, Gunjan Kumar, alleged that he was cheated out of Rs 32 lakh in a land transaction involving property dealers. The prosecution charged the accused under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120(B)/34. The petitioner claimed …

Bipat Rai @ Vipat RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Bipat Rai and Avadesh Ray, filed anticipatory bail applications fearing arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.572 of 2024, which alleged offences of extortion, criminal breach of trust, cheating, false evidence and a provision of the CPC. The prosecution alleged that the …

Upendar Kumar @ Upendra Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Upendar Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly defrauding a micro‑finance company of Rs. 2 lakhs. The prosecution alleged criminal breach of trust, dishonest …

RANJAN KUMAR @ RANJAY KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

DISMISSED

The appellants filed an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking anticipatory bail after a Special Judge refused it in connection with FIR No.19‑2023 alleging fraud, cheating, and caste‑based harassment. The prosecution alleged that the accused had set up a …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, a hospital manager, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging criminal breach of trust and cheating under IPC Sections 406, 409 and 420, claiming the dispute is essentially a monetary civil matter. The State opposed bail, but both parties agreed to appear before the District …

Sanjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust and dishonour of cheques under IPC §§420, 406 and NI Act §138. The dispute arose from a vehicle sale agreement where post‑dated cheques issued by the petitioner were dishonoured. Both …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar (Manoj Prasad) was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging multiple offences under the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, including dowry harassment and criminal intimidation. His wife, Samjeera Devi, claimed she was thrown out of the house, faced dowry demands, and that the …

SONU KUMAR @ SONU KUMAR PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Sonu Kumar Paswan sought bail in a case registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC and Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after a police raid recovered a country‑made pistol and motorcycles. The only link to the petitioner was the confessional statements of two arrested …

Tunna Kumar @ Tunna PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Tunna Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2019 case alleging multiple offences under the IPC and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused demanded extortion and stabbed an informant, and that the petitioner assaulted another …

Devendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Devendra Kumar, was charged in 2016 under Sections 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 75 of the D.P. Act based on a complaint by Soni Kumari. An earlier anticipatory bail was granted in 2016 on conditions of restoring matrimonial harmony, the informant’s willingness to …

Bimal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bimal Kumar and Shilpi Shalini, directors of Anu Anand Construction, were implicated in a FIR alleging cheating under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34 for failing to deliver flats in the Sai Enclave project. They contended that the delay was due to RERA directives and that the matter …

Md. Sanaur @ Md. SanauwarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Sanaur, was arrested in connection with a complaint under Section 498A IPC alleging dowry harassment and his alleged ouster of his wife, Afreen Perveen, from the matrimonial home. The petitioner pleaded innocence, asserted no dowry demand, and offered to pay Rs. 50,000 to the …

Sudish Kumar @ BhulaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sudish Kumar and Chhotelal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 45 of 2022) alleging abduction of a minor girl, with charges under several IPC sections and the POCSO Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, …

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan SharmaversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellant, Raushan Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 307, 302 and 34, Arms Act section 27 and SC/ST Act section 3(2)(v) for a murder incident in Bahadurpur. The trial court denied his bail application, holding that the charges were serious. On appeal, the appellant argued that he was falsely …

Vijay Singh @ Vijay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vijay Singh, was implicated in a murder case (Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC) concerning the death of a schoolboy. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the informant’s suspicion and statements of witnesses, with no eyewitness to the alleged killing. The petitioner argued …

Md. Jafer Imam @ Md. Shamim @ Jafar ImamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jafer Imam, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Rajgir P.S. Case No. 329 of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, based on an informant’s claim that the petitioner received Rs. 16.5 lakh. The petitioner contended …

Dr Pradeep Kumar Singh @ Pradeep SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dr. Pradeep Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged under Sections 498A and 504 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act alleging dowry demands and cruelty. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false, stemming from a strained marital relationship and …

Rahul Singh @ Rahul kr. Singh @ Rahul Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Singh, was implicated in a police case (Katihar G.R. P.S. Case No. 118 of 2024) for alleged assault on two constables while they inspected a pantry car. The prosecution’s case rests solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no specific allegation against the …

Dhanji PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Dhanji Paswan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Bhabua (Sonhan) P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted the informant and …

Pappu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Barh PS No.486 of 2023) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, assaulted an informant and …

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, was implicated in a case involving alleged kidnapping, rape and offences under the POCSO Act concerning a 14‑year‑old girl who disappeared from Khagaria. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the victim voluntarily went to Delhi, later married him, and they …

Pawan Mandal @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pawan Mandal was arrested under IPC Section 354 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing and teasing the informant’s 11‑year‑old daughter. The petitioner claims he is innocent and was framed due to village politics, having been in custody for seven months. The informant’s …

Om Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Om Prakash Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 365, 302, 394, 120B and 34, and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the murder of a sand‑truck driver. The Special Judge had rejected his bail application, relying mainly on a confessional statement of a …

Abhishek AnandversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Anand, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal complaint under Section 498A IPC alleging dowry cruelty and an illicit relationship. He contended that the allegations were false, the marriage occurred on 1 December 2021, and the complaint was filed in 2022 after …

Vikash Kumar @ Vivek MuskanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Vikash Kumar, was charged with murder, criminal conspiracy, illegal possession of arms and an offence under the SC/ST Act after a firing incident at a dance program resulted in a death. The prosecution alleged that the appellant and others were holding weapons and that the deceased …

Neelam Kumari @ Nilam KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Neelam Kumari, was named in an FIR for alleged forgery of an appointment letter related to a GNM post, invoking IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471/34. She contended that she had no knowledge of the forged document and played no role in its creation. The State opposed her request …

Md. MolajimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Molajim, was arrested in a case involving alleged dowry harassment under Sections 498(A), 379 and 34 of the IPC. He had an outstanding maintenance liability of Rs.2,34,000, of which Rs.1,00,000 had been paid and the balance of Rs.1,34,000 was promised to be paid in equal …

Jay Kumar Prasad @ Jay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jay Kumar Prasad, a former Mukhiya, was implicated in a complaint (No.331(C) of 2021) alleging embezzlement of ₹22,02,900 under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of the IPC relating to funds of the Nal Jal Yojana. The petitioner claimed the entire amount had already been deposited in the Ward Kriyayavan …

Dasai PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dasai Paswan was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dowry harassment and torture of his wife, Sarita Devi. The petitioner denied the allegations and submitted an undertaking to keep his wife with …

MR. S. KUMAR @ SHAILESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, S. Kumar, a Deputy Secretary in the Bihar Health Department, was sanctioned for prosecution under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC for allegedly colluding to stay a mutation proceeding in favour of Kumar Gyanendra. The petitioner argued that the stay order dated 27‑06‑2013 …

GANGO MAHALDARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, members of the Mahaldar family, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 295 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 379, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that they assaulted the victim in a …

Sri Majharool HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Majharool Haque, a medicine shop owner, was implicated in a complaint alleging violations of several provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940 and Section 420 of the IPC for operating without a valid drug licence. The petitioner produced a licence valid from 2005 to 2010 and a receipt of …

Subhash Mahto @ Virappan Mahto @ Veerappaan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Subhash Mahto, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 386, 387 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code relating to a robbery and assault incident. The incident involved unidentified motorcyclists assaulting an informant and robbing co‑workers of Rs.20,000. The …

Mukesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Sonbarsa Raj Case No. 81 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for defalcating approximately Rs. 50 lakh of PACS funds. He claimed innocence, stating he was …

Kuleen Yadav @ Kunil Yadav @ Kulean YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kuleen Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 66 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC. The deceased was a woman who was allegedly murdered by her matrimonial inmates, and the petitioner, her brother‑in‑law, claims he had no …

Upendra Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Upendra Prasad Yadav, sought relief fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 116 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 384 and 386 for allegedly taking Rs. 15 lakh in a failed marriage arrangement. He claimed innocence, stating he was falsely implicated and is a …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Golu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Bihta P.S. Case No. 878 of 2022) involving alleged assault, torture and dowry demands under IPC sections 341, 323, 494, 498A read with section 34 and under the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and …

Kundan Kumar @ Rishikant Kumar @ Kundan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(2), 308(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly demanding a ransom of Rs. 10 lakh during flood control work and assaulting a pocklan operator. He applied for …

Prabhat Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Prabhat Kumar Gupta applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 334 of 2023) under Section 498A IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted and tortured the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed …

Dharmveer PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Dharmveer Paswan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Jamui Mahila PS Case No. 37 of 2020) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 313 with 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. He claimed innocence, asserted he has no criminal antecedent, and that the …

Umesh SawversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Umesh Saw petitioned for anticipatory bail in a dowry harassment case (IPC 498A, 406; Dowry Prohibition Act 3,4) after a proclamation under Sections 82 and 83 of the CrPC had been issued against him for alleged abscondence. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the proclamation barred relief …

Ranjit sahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Ranjit Sah sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case under Section 498A IPC. The prosecution alleged he, along with others, assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and filed an application for anticipatory bail. The court, relying on …

Umesh Sharma @ Jaldhar @ Umesh dasversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Umesh Sharma and Raghunath Pandey, were implicated in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly duping people by promising jobs through a fake Bal Bari Center. Petitioners sought bail, arguing that the FIR names only …

Akash Kumar @ Akash Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Akash Kumar, was implicated in a kidnapping case (IPC §§363, 366A read with 34) involving the alleged abduction of a minor for marriage. He claimed innocence, asserting that the victim had eloped with him and that he had no prior criminal record. The court examined the allegations …

Raman MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raman Mahto and Ramjatan Baitha, ward officials, were charged under IPC sections 406, 409, 420 and 34 for allegedly withdrawing Rs 16.95 lakh from a ward implementation account, completing work worth Rs 9.26 lakh under the Har Ghar Nal Ka Jal Yojna, and allegedly embezzling the …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Akash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a case involving alleged loot and violations of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a stolen motorcycle was recovered from his house and that an accomplice had named …

Md. Aadil @ Md. Adil @ Shahbaz AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Aadil, was charged under IPC sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 34 (common intention) and under section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing indiscriminately and injuring an informant. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no intention to fire at the informant, …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dacoity case (Barh P.S. Case No. 450 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals committed the dacoity and the petitioner’s name appeared …

Chhathu SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Chhathu Sharma and Shashi Bhushan Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 168 of 2021) involving multiple IPC offences including assault, robbery and criminal intimidation. The FIR alleged that a group, allegedly led by Jata Sharma, attacked the …

Sunila Sinha @ Sunil SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunila Sinha, a former teacher, was accused of forging certificates to obtain her appointment and faced charges under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B. She had already been terminated from service and claimed no prior criminal record. The State opposed her bail application. The Court …

Mahanand GohitmanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers, feared arrest in connection with the death of their youngest brother, who was alleged to have shot himself. The prosecution charged them under IPC sections 306 and 201 and Arms Act section 27, alleging they instigated the suicide. The petitioners contended that they …

Bhola KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhola Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging offences under Sections 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POSCO Act, accusing him of abducting and attempting to marry the informant’s daughter. The prosecution alleged that the girl was …

Udgar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Udgar Yadav sought relief from arrest in a case filed under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the charges of dowry‑related torture were false and stemmed from a love marriage. He contended that he was willing to provide a monthly allowance of Rs.6,500 to …

Md. AfrojversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Afroj, was implicated in a dowry harassment complaint (Case No. 49 of 2024) alleging offences under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and false implication. The State opposed the …

Sahdeo RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sahdeo Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging misappropriation of Rs. 18,25,000 under Sections 409 and 34 IPC. He contended that his son forged his signature and misappropriated the funds, and that a substantial portion of the amount has already been …

Visheshwar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Visheshwar Sahni applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (Shahpur Patori PS Case No. 581 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 304(B), 201, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that he …

Abhay Kumar Ranjan @ Abhay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar Ranjan, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint (C847/2023) alleging offences under several IPC sections and the D.P. Act, filed by his wife Sharda Devi alleging cruelty, demand for a motorcycle and money, and her subsequent ouster from the matrimonial home. The …

Kapil PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kapil Paswan was arrested in connection with a bomb blast at an Airtel mobile tower, charged under several IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 435, 436, 120(B)), the Explosive Substances Act (sections 3 and 4) and the CLA Act (section 17). The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated for political …

Jyoti Prakash SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jyoti Prakash Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a complaint alleging dowry harassment under Sections 323 and 498A IPC. He denied the allegations and asserted his willingness to restore conjugal rights, having also filed a restitution of conjugal rights suit …

Rajnath KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Rajnath Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case (Section 302 IPC) registered as Manihari P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025. The prosecution alleged he strangulated the deceased, but the petitioner’s counsel argued that no material evidence linked him to the crime and …

Mamta KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mamta Kumari, a former Panchayat Teacher, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sahiyara PS Case No. 47 of 2023) alleging forgery of an experience certificate and offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). The prosecution alleged she obtained the appointment by …

Kameshwar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Kameshwar Tiwari was arrested in connection with a case under sections 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code alleging kidnapping of a minor girl for marriage. He contended that he was falsely implicated and had no involvement in the alleged affair between co‑accused Kishore Tiwari and the victim. The …

Sneha Kumari Barnawal @ Sneha BarnawalaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are sisters and a relative of the main accused in a land‑sale dispute, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under several IPC sections alleging fraud, assault and homicide. They contended that their signatures were taken merely as co‑sharers of the property and …

Yogendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Yogendra Singh feared arrest in a complaint (No. 2323 of 2023) alleging cheating under Section 420 of the IPC, where the prosecution claims he collected Rs. 1,25,000 in three installments for purported house‑construction work. The petitioner contended that he is innocent, that the matter …

Mithlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mithlesh Yadav was arrested in connection with a 2009 robbery case (PS Barachatti, Gaya) under IPC Section 394 and the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the confession of a co‑accused who named the petitioner as a participant. The petitioner, who has no prior criminal record and had …

Md. AbubversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Abub, was charged with kidnapping, rape and offences under the POCSO Act for allegedly abducting the informant's minor daughter. He sought bail, claiming innocence and asserting that the victim’s statement under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita indicated a consensual …

Fahim Ansari @ Raju @ Raju Sri Md. Alimuddin AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Fahim Ansari applied for regular bail in a robbery case (Sections 392, 395, 412 IPC) arising from Simultalla P.S. Case No. 35 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that four accused on two motorcycles looted an informant, and the petitioner was implicated based on a co‑accused's confessional statement. …

Uttam PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Uttam Pandey was arrested in connection with a 2015 case alleging he snatched a mobile, later kidnapped the informant, and pressed his neck causing death, offences punishable under Sections 307 and 34 of the IPC. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent, false implication, and that the …

Panchu Mahto @ Sonelal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Panchu Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Baruraj P.S. Case No. 269 of 2023) for alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 376 and 385 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The Patna …

Promod YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Promod Yadav, was arrested in connection with a 2018 case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that five accused, including the petitioner, were armed and that Manish Yadav fired at an informant, while the petitioner claimed …

Manu Rai @ Manu Kumar Rai @ Monu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Manu Rai applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged armed robbery. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with another accused, stopped a man with a pistol and looted cash and valuables. The petitioner contended that the FIR was …

Basudeo Kumar @ Basudeo MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Basudeo Kumar, feared arrest in connection with a criminal complaint (Case No. 1557(C) of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 324, 504, 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He expressed willingness to keep the second opposite party, Nipu Kumari, with …

Ravi Shankar Yadav @ Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Yadav, was arrested in a fraud case (IPC §§420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 34) after the informant alleged he was the informant's son, a claim the informant denied. The petitioner contended he was falsely implicated and that the informant fabricated the FIR to shift liability, …

Sandeep Sahani @ Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sandeep Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 686 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 363, 365, 366A/34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged the petitioner had kidnapped a minor girl, while …

Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra pd YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravindra Rai, was charged under several IPC sections for assaulting an informant and his family with weapons, causing injuries including a fractured head. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the injuries were superficial, there was no injury report for one victim, and that a …

Md. Mustak @ Md. MustaqueversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Mustak, was implicated in a complaint (No. 652C of 2024) alleging assault and dowry harassment under IPC sections 323 and 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Fearing arrest, he applied for anticipatory bail. The State and the informant opposed the application. …

Pratap SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Pratap Singh, a member of the Panchayat Teacher Niyozan Committee, was alleged to have conspired with Neelam Kumari to facilitate her selection using forged certificates, leading to charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 120B and 471. He applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in …

Prem Kishore SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prem Kishore Singh sought relief from arrest in a cyber‑fraud case where he was alleged to have been involved in misappropriating Rs 26,57,348 under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and IT Act sections 65, 66C, 66D. The informant, a LIC branch manager, filed the FIR on 24‑10‑2024, but the …

Dinesh Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Sahani, was charged under several IPC sections for allegedly misappropriating Rs. 3 lakh received for a land purchase. He contended that the amount was actually a repayment he had earlier given to the informant, making the dispute essentially civil. The petitioner had …

Poornima DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Poornima Devi and Bachhu Mukhiya, in‑laws of the complainant, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 23/2023) under IPC sections 498A, 341, 323, 379 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State opposed, contending that a …

Dindayal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Dindayal Yadav, was arrested in connection with the shooting of an informant's son and charged under Sections 109 and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, Sections 307 and 120B of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, no …

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra MistryversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Mistry, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a 2020 case alleging multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault and grievous hurt. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant and his nephew, causing serious injuries. …

Ravi Ranjan Pratap MauryaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravi Ranjan Pratap Maurya was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, robbery, cheating and other offences under sections 323, 341, 342, 379, 406, 420 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from a disputed land‑sale transaction where the informant claimed an advance of Rs.5,00,000 …

Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shanti Devi and Arvind Yadav were arrested in connection with a case involving assault on an informant's family, resulting in the mother’s death. The prosecution alleged that both were armed and participated in the assault, charging them under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The …

Shailendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shailendra Singh was arrested on 1 July 2025 in connection with a 2023 case involving alleged forgery and land mutation, charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, used forged documents to mutate the informant's land in the name of their …

Govindra Kumar @ Govinda KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Govindra Kumar, was arrested in a Special POCSO case for alleged offences under Section 366(A) of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, stemming from a complaint that a minor girl, the informant's daughter, had eloped and married him. The petitioner contended that the marriage was …

Ful Mohammad Miyan @ Ful Mohammad Ansari @ Fultam MiyanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ful Mohammad Miyan, was arrested in connection with a murder case involving the killing of an informant's younger brother, charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, there was no direct …

Shiv Kumar Rawani @ Shiv KaharversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shiv Kumar Rawani and Sharvan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a complaint case registered under sections 323, 341, 504 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging assault on the complainant's daughter. The prosecution alleged misbehaviour and assault, while the petitioners claimed …

Moinuddin @ Md. MoinuddinversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of eleven men from Garaiya village, were charged under Section 109 of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNS) Act in connection with a land‑dispute‑related altercation that resulted in grievous injuries to non‑vital parts of the body. Petitioners 1‑8 were already on bail and had …

Godawari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Godawari Devi, a 70‑year‑old mother‑in‑law, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the alleged dowry‑related death of her daughter‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged that the deceased committed suicide after …

Suiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Suiya Devi (60) and Bachiya Devi (77), were charged with assault leading to the death of an 80‑year‑old informant under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners attacked the deceased with a …

Manish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Manish Yadav was arrested in connection with a 2011 case in Karpi where he was alleged to have fired a pistol at an informant, causing the informant’s death. He is charged under IPC sections 307 (attempt to murder), 342, 34, 302 (murder) and under section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Raushan Kumar, appealed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act against the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged caste-based assault and robbery. He claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the FIR was filed 11 days after the incident, …

Dilip RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dilip Rai, arrested on 3 July 2025 in connection with a 2004 dacoity case (Section 395 IPC), sought bail. The FIR did not name him; his alleged involvement was inferred solely from a co‑accused’s confessional statement, with no other material or identification parade conducted. The petitioner …

Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raju Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly forging a diploma to obtain a contractual appointment as a survey amin. He has been in custody since 13 August 2025, has no prior criminal record, and a …

Kari Mahto @ Kari LalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Kari Mahto applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 307, 341, 323, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to a money dispute. The prosecution contended that Mahto discharged a firearm, causing a simple back injury to …

Sujeet Kumar @ Golu ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, where three miscreants allegedly stole cash and valuables from an informant. The petitioner’s name appeared only in the confessional statement of a co-accused who had already been granted …

Md. SarwarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Sarwar, was arrested on 21 June 2025 in connection with a 2018 robbery case (PS Case No. 355) involving offences under IPC Sections 399 and 402 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused were apprehended based on secret information and a pistol and cartridges were …

Raju SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Raju Singh, applied for regular bail in a case registered under IPC sections 307, 341, 323 and Arms Act section 27, alleging that he fired at an informant but missed his head. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with co‑accused Palu Singh, were armed and opened fire, …

Md. Jawed @ Jawed AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jawed Ansari, was implicated in a theft case under Sections 379 and 34 of the IPC after an e‑rickshaw was allegedly stolen. He argued that the FIR was lodged a day after the incident, the recovered vehicle was found in an open tin shed accessible to all, and that personal enmity …

Md. MustaqueversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Mustaque, was charged under Sections 303(2) and 111(2)(b) of the BNS for the alleged theft of two tractors whose GPS‑equipped vehicles were recovered from his residence. He had previously been arrested in a separate case (Sakra P.S. Case No. 331 of 2025) but was on bail there, …

Jawed Ahmad @ Tunna Mian @ Tuna MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jawed Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 120(B)/34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act) arising from the killing of an informant's son. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement of a …

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, was arrested on 18 August 2025 in connection with a kidnapping case (Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 IPC) alleging he abducted an informant's daughter for marriage. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and that the allegations were fabricated. The victim, …

Rustam AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered bail applications of Krishnanandan Kumar and Rustam Ali, who were in custody for alleged offences under IPC sections 384, 386, 427, 504 and 506 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they threatened an informant via a mobile call demanding Rs 20 lakh and later …

Manoj Kumar @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging criminal intimidation, forgery, and the creation and distribution of obscene material under Sections 506, 469 of the IPC and Sections 67, 67A of the IT Act. The complainant claimed the accused threatened his family, blackmailed his …

Pradeep Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pradeep Kumar Yadav was in judicial custody for offences alleged under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the BNS, later deemed true under Section 306 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, abducted the informant’s daughter. The petitioner claimed he was falsely …

Krishnanandan Kumar @ Krishnandan KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered bail applications of Krishnanandan Kumar and Rustam Ali, who were in custody for alleged offences under IPC sections 384, 386, 427, 504 and 506 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they threatened an informant via a mobile call demanding Rs 20 lakh and later …

Pankaj SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pankaj Sah, was charged under multiple sections of the IPC for allegedly entering the informant's house, abusing and assaulting the informant and his husband, and causing a simple injury with the butt of a pistol. The informant's husband later died, but the death was attributed to …

Arvind Yadav @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shanti Devi and Arvind Yadav were arrested in connection with a case involving assault on an informant's family, resulting in the mother’s death. The prosecution alleged that both were armed and participated in the assault, charging them under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The …

Ramesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ramesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber‑related case (Sitamarhi Cyber P.S. Case No. 27 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 379 and IT Act section 66(D). He contended that the money withdrawn from the informant's account was done by unknown persons and that the …

Vinod ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vinod Chaudhary and Ramjeet Singh were named in an FIR for alleged possession of 1515.98 litres of illegal liquor, a vehicle, and live and dead cartridges, invoking sections of the IPC, Arms Act and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of conscious …

Navin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Navin Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Bhadaur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2022, alleging offences under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged misappropriation of funds under the Nal Jal Yojana. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …

Madan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of relatives, were named in an FIR for alleged cheating and related offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from a dispute over a land sale where the informant claimed receipt of Rs.26 lakh in cash and Rs.5 lakh by bank. Petitioners argued that …

ARYAN KUMAR @ AZAD @ MD. AZADversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Aryan Kumar alias Md. Azad, was charged under IPC sections 376, 420 and 506 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a minor Hindu girl under the pretext of offering her a job, threatening and blackmailing her with videos and photographs. …

Jitendra Kumar @ Chhotan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute‑related incident where he allegedly assaulted an informant with an iron rod and fired a weapon, leading to multiple injuries. He faced charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 504 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …

Awadhesh Kumar @ Avdhesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Awadhesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a road robbery case (PS Sonbarsa Case No.36 of 2022) involving offences under IPC Sections 395 and 397. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and the petitioner’s name surfaced only through a confessional statement of an accused …

Md. Kamal @ Kamal SekhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Ofapur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault. They contended that the allegations were false, arising from a neighbour dispute over drainage, and that only one of …

Rajendra PalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the IPC. They alleged that the informant’s sister was married in 2014, faced dowry demands, was assaulted, and later died, but …

Bachchelal PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bachchelal Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Witch (Daain) Practices Act. He asserted a clean record and claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the FIR did not specifically allege assault …

Hastanand @ Hastanand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, owners of trucks seized by police, were charged under Sections 188, 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code after their drivers allegedly removed the trucks without their knowledge or consent. They filed an anticipatory bail petition, asserting that they had no participation in the …

Priya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Priya Devi, a woman with a clean antecedent, was made an accused in a murder case (Sections 302, 201 & 34 IPC) alleging an illicit relationship with the deceased's husband. She filed a petition for anticipatory bail, arguing she had no role in the murder. The State opposed the bail. The …

AAMLI THAKURversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Aamli, Manoj and Sonu Thakur, filed an anticipatory bail petition fearing arrest in a complaint case involving offences under Sections 342, 448, 451, 380, 384 and 386 of the Indian Penal Code. The State opposed the petition, contending that criminal proceedings under Section 82 and …

Pappu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Pappu Rai applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging assault on Pradeep Rai’s head, resulting in grievous injury. The FIR charges him under Sections 147, 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, and he has a prior criminal antecedent. The petitioner …

Suresh MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suresh Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint case alleging his involvement in a dowry‑death and related offences under Sections 304B and 201 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the deceased’s daughter was murdered after a dowry dispute, and that the petitioner, a …

Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged illegal liquor possession (1525 litres) and offences under IPC sections 272, 273, 420 and the Bihar Excise Act. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, did not have the liquor …

Nitish Kumar Mehta @ Ramchandra MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Shailesh Kumar applied for bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498-A, 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, stemming from a matrimonial dispute. The petitioner denied the allegations, claiming he was falsely implicated and that the case was …

Lal Bahadur Singh @ Lal Bahadur Prasad @ Bahadur PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Lal Bahadur Singh and Lalbabu Singh, were arrested in connection with a murder case (Bikram P.S. Case No. 132 of 2024) alleged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that they, along with family members, tortured and killed the deceased because …

Bholu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bholu Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 164.100 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned, attracting charges under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. He contended that he had …

Ajit Tiwari @ Ajit Kumar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ajit Tiwari, was accused of brutally assaulting and setting fire to his wife, leading to her death, under Sections 304B, 226, 34 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent, and denial of any dowry demand. The …

GUDDU @GULAB KHATRI S/O RAMKARAN PANDEY THRO PAYAL GUDDU PANDEYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Guddu Khatri was preventively detained on 27‑12‑2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his friend Payal Guddu Pandey. The petitioner argued that no …

STATE OF GUJARATversusYUSUFBHAI HASANBHAI QURESHI

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State appealed the acquittal of Yusufbhai Hasanbhai Qureshi and others by the Sessions Judge, who had found insufficient evidence to prove charges of murder, dowry death, and cruelty. The deceased, Nurjaha, and her infant daughter died from burns allegedly caused by kerosene, with the …

THE STATE OF GUJARATversusKALUBHAI SHAMALABHAI KAMLIYA

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of fourteen accused in a murder case involving Premjibhai Alabhai, a Scheduled Caste victim. The trial court had found the prosecution’s evidence insufficient, noting that key eye‑witnesses turned hostile and police officers lacked personal …

RAM AUTARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants were convicted under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping a boy in 1982, based on eyewitness testimony and police investigation. The trial court sentenced Ram Autar to six years' rigorous imprisonment. In the appeal, the counsel argued that the incident occurred 44 …

DILSHADversusDEVENDRA SHARMA

Dilshad filed a criminal revision challenging the dismissal of his application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. which alleged that Devendra Sharma had concealed the pendency of an execution suit while seeking enforcement of an ex‑parte decree. The revisionist contended that such concealment amounted to …

Hitesh Ram @ Ritesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Hitesh Ram, who has been in custody since 15 October 2025 in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 93 of 2023, involving offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 302 and 34. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, has a clean …

Ranjit Prasad @ Ranjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Prasad, was arrested on 10 October 2025 in connection with a 2007 incident in Hilsa, Nalanda, where he and co‑accused allegedly assaulted an informant and his brother with lathis, causing injuries. He is charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 427 read with 34. The …

Ganesh Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ganesh Kumar, was named in an FIR (PS Dumariya Ghat Case No. 122 of 2024) for alleged offences including assault, dowry demand and attempted murder under Sections 341, 323, 342, 307, 498A, 504, 34, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for bail, …

Md. Shamsher @ Shamsher AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Shamsher Alam, sought to quash an order that had rejected his Section 239 Cr.P.C. petition for discharge in a dowry‑related case filed by his wife, Kahkashah Parveen. He alleged that the marriage was illegal because the wife was already lawfully married to Jabir Hussain and had …

TARKESHWAR SINGH AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR

ALLOWED

The petitioners – the father, mother and brothers of the complainant – sought quashing of the cognizance taken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in a complaint alleging assault, robbery and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 323, 341, 504 and 379. The complainant, a tempo driver, claimed …

Kalawati KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, a Police Sub‑Inspector, was punished with a six‑month withholding of increment for allegedly failing to complete a rape‑related investigation within the prescribed 60‑day period. She challenged the punishment by filing a writ petition seeking quashing of the disciplinary order dated …

Chunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chunnu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of a 15‑year‑old girl under Sections 363, 366(A) IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The victim later gave a statement under Section 164 CrPC stating she went with the petitioner of her own …

Ajay Das @ Ajay Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Ajay Das was named in a complaint (Case No. 1265C of 2022) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 494, 307 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, including cruelty and physical assault for allegedly demanding Rs 8 lakh and a vehicle as dowry. The petitioner applied for …

Jitendra Kumar @ KunkunversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant Jitendra Kumar was convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a 15‑year‑old girl, a minor, under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to four years’ rigorous imprisonment with a fine. On appeal, the defence argued that the victim’s and witnesses’ statements were …

VIJAY KUMAR JHAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Vijay Kumar Jha appealed against the Special Judge’s order rejecting his Section 227 CrPC application, which had allowed framing of charges for alleged offences under the IPC and the SC/ST (PoA) Act arising from a land‑sale dispute with Geeta Devi. The complainant alleged that the …

Ravi Shankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Shankar Kumar, was charged under Sections 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged cruelty and dowry demand of Rs. 3 lakh. He contended that the demand was for starting a business, not dowry, and that he has no income, rendering …

Virendra Kumar Singh @ Virendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three relatives from Paliganj, were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and others using brick-plates, causing a fractured nose and other injuries, alleged to be committed with intent to cause death arising from a land dispute. The petitioners contended that only the …

Md. Jafar @ Jafar Alam @ JafarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jafar Alam, was charged under Sections 323 and 498‑A IPC for assault and dowry harassment arising from a complaint filed in 2023. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations of cruelty and dowry demand were vague and that his second marriage was permissible under …

MD. SARFARAZ @ SHARFARZ ALAMversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Md. Sarfaraz Alam was arrested in connection with a criminal trial for alleged cruelty, dowry demand, and multiple offences under the IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint alleged that he demanded a golden chain and a motorcycle as dowry, leading to physical assault, but the complaint was …

Khayali Yadav @ Khiyali YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Khayali Yadav, was named in an FIR (Noorsarai PS Case No.375 of 2020) for murder, kidnapping and conspiracy under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B read with 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that co‑accused called the informant's husband, who later went missing and was found dead, but the …

Bipin Rai @ Bipin RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Bipin Rai and Manoj Rai were convicted under Sections 307, 448 (read with 34) of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on an informant at a village chabutra. The prosecution relied on the informant’s testimony and several witnesses, but the defence highlighted …