Patna High Court
Khayali Yadav @ Khiyali YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, directing his release on bail subject to statutory conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Khayali Yadav, was named in an FIR (Noorsarai PS Case No.375 of 2020) for murder, kidnapping and conspiracy under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B read with 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that co‑accused called the informant's husband, who later went missing and was found dead, but the petitioner's counsel argued that no specific allegation linked him to the act and that his inclusion was merely due to a long‑standing land dispute. The petitioner also faces three other criminal cases with the same informant but is on bail in those matters. The prosecution contended that the petitioner was actively involved, yet admitted that the FIR only raised suspicion against him. Considering the lack of concrete evidence and the precedent of anticipatory bail granted to other co‑accused, the Court ordered his release on bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS 2023.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate relief when an accused is implicated in an FIR solely on the basis of suspicion?
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 CrPC and Section 482 BNSS in the present case.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 120-B, 201, 302, 34
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- murder
- suspicion
- IPC
- CrPC
- BNSS
- land dispute
- co‑accused
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22545 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2020 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda
======================================================
Khayali Yadav @ Khiyali Yadav, S/o Late Shivalak Gop, R/o Village-
Mkanpur, P.S.- Noorsarai, Distt.- Nalanda (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Parties
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
3 20-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and
apprehending his arrest in connection with Noorsarai P.S.
Case No.375 of 2020 registered under Sections 302, 201 and
120-B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per FIR, the informant alleged that the named
co-accused called her husband from boring house whereafter,
he went missing and subsequently, his dead body was found
in next morning from a well.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for
petitioner that the allegation for calling the deceased husband
of informant is not available against this petitioner and being
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22545 of 2025(3) dt.20-01-2026
2/3
an afterthought out of previous enmity arising out of land
dispute, which is pending between the parties since 2007,
subsequently, concluding the information qua occurrence,
informant named 11 co-accused persons including this
petitioner. It is pointed out that save and except suspicion
nothing survives against this petitioner out of previous
enmity.
5. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted
that petitioner found involved in three more criminal cases
with same informant and her father-in-law, where he is on
bail. While concluding argument, it is submitted that similarly
situated co-accused namely, Dayanand Yadav, Indrajeet @
Kaloo, Karoo Kumar and Ajit Yadav were granted anticipatory
bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court through Cr.
Misc. No.43900 of 2022 dated 23.11.2022.
6. Learned APP while opposing the prayer of bail
submitted that the petitioner alleged to be involved in
occurrence actively. However, he could not disputed the
factual submissions that FIR suggesting only suspicion qua
petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22545 of 2025(3) dt.20-01-2026
3/3
7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of fact as petitioner implicated only with present
occurrence of murder on the basis of suspicion, accordingly,
the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or
surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks
from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Biharsharif, Nalanda in
connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No.375 of 2020, subject
to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’)/under Section
482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in
short ‘BNSS’).
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Sanjeet/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.