Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
457 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The wife (applicant) filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of the divorce petition filed by her husband from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ichalkaranji to the Family Court at Ahmednagar, invoking her severe medical condition (heterozygous pathogenic variants in GNC gene …
The petitioners, Jaideep Gadkari and Mangesh Gadkari, sought to quash FIR No.5 of 2020 filed under sections 420, 409, 34 of the IPC and various provisions of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, alleging that the criminal proceedings were …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 9522 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the same Act. The applicant argued that he was never …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 6218 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was never arrested and that the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 5753 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 420, 408 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was never arrested and that the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 7096 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 117(2) of the same Act. The applicant argued that he was never …
The applicants, Vinod Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Misc. Case No. 493 of 2026 and an order dated 8 June 2026 that directed an investigation under Section 175(3) of the same Act. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 1‑1‑2022 in Criminal Case No. 47 of 2022 (Section 323 IPC) before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh. They contended that …
The applicant, Pradeep Kumar Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a 9 July 2026 order from a 2018 Session Trial that had framed charges against him under IPC sections 302 and 34 for a 2017 crime. The case was pending before a …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued on 16 January 2026 before a charge sheet was filed in a gang‑rape case. The court heard arguments from counsel for both parties. During the hearing, the …
The applicant, Raj Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. issued while he was already on bail. He contended that the warrant was issued without any …
The applicant, a juvenile, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 46 of 2026) arising under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 443 of 2022, which pertained to crime No. 408 of 2020 involving offences under Sections 376, 377, 452, 323 and 506 of the IPC. The trial …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a Special Judge's order that rejected a Section 311 CrPC application for further cross‑examination of the child victim (PW‑1). The trial court had relied on Section 33(5) of the POCSO …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 2133 of 2026, which pertained to offences under Sections 76, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the same statute. The application was presented …
The applicant, Menpal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No. 278 of 2026) arising from multiple charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The application was …
The applicants, Aditya Raj and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 48 of 2022) arising from offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The application was presented before the …
The applicant, Jitendra @ Jitu, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 18‑08‑2026 that dismissed his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application to recall witnesses PW‑1 and PW‑2 in a murder trial (IPC §§302, 34). He further …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO case. The applicant contended that the NBW was issued without first serving a summons or a bailable …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 8 June 2026 that had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application in a criminal trial involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 504 and 506 of …
The applicant, Leeladhar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 19 August 2026 passed in Session Trial No. 240 of 2019, which had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application. The High Court observed that the application …
The applicant, Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that he forged the complainant’s signature to surrender two LIC policies without authority, invoking sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant contended that he acted with the …
The appellant, Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with FIR No. 340 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR was based on …
The applicant, Sripal Singh Rawat, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C. No. 1, Gautam Budh Nagar to decide Criminal Revision No. 343 of 2023, which arose from an order dated 26.3.2025 and has …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19, Deoria, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 4252 of 2023) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Ashish Agarwal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate‑II, Jhansi to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 12883 of 2022) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The applicant Rakesh Chaurasiya filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Gautam Buddh Nagar, to dispose of criminal case No. 162 of 2026 (arising from crime No. 399 of 2025 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 918 of 2026) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Mawana, Meerut, where a charge‑sheet had already been filed against them for offences …
The applicant, Devendra Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 338 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304‑A of the IPC. After hearing arguments, the …
The applicant, Smt. Soni Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction that the Judicial Magistrate‑III in Gorakhpur decide Complaint Case No. 36267 of 2025, filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic …
The applicant, Nisar Ahmad, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Kanpur Dehat, to decide a complaint (Case No. 1659 of 2019) filed under Section 138 of the …
The applicant, Jai Krishna Kumar Pandey, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Basti, to conclude the pending Complaint Case No. 80 of 2026. The High Court noted that the …
Smt Jyoti Gangwar filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.)/Fast Track Court, Rampur to decide Complaint Case No. 369 of 2025 filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, …
The applicant, Mool Chand, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Jaunpur, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 14455 of 2022) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicants, Smt Chintamani and two others, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a directive to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate in Hasanpur, Amroha, to dispose of a criminal case (Case No. 423 of 2007) that had been pending since 2007 …
The applicant, Smt. Istuti Sharma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 169 of 2025) filed under Section 12 of the Protection of …
The applicant, Vijay Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 165517 of 2024) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The applicant, Smt Vinita Verma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No. 3, Meerut, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 13526 of 2025) under Section 138 of the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 9, Varanasi, to dispose of a criminal case (Case No. 110142 of 2024) that had been pending since 2024. The case involved …
The applicant, Rahul Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Azamgarh, to dispose of Complaint Case No. 2205 of 2025 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Azamgarh, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 2206 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, …
The applicant, Praveen Kumar Tiwari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Azamgarh, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 2126 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of …
The applicant, Smt. Shalini Kapila, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C‑I, Agra, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 25631 of 2021) filed under Section 12 of the …
The applicant, Smt. Abhilasha Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Etawah, to decide a pending maintenance case (No. 318 of 2023) under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. …
The applicant, Vijay Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Gorakhpur, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 118885 of 2021) filed under Section 138 of the …
The applicant, Devesh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction that the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Jaunpur decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 178 of 2022) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The applicant, Smt Mamta, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 3 August 2026 that had rejected the victim’s application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Session Trial concerning offences under …
The applicant, Lakhvinder Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order dated 23‑08‑2024 that dismissed his discharge application in a rape case (Section 376‑C IPC) pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah. The …
The applicant Vishnu filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 1 September 2026 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Additional Sessions Judge in Kannauj. The order had added charges under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and …
The applicant, Sagar Laxman Valvi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 108, 352, 62 and 356(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that he threatened the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 6102 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 191(2), 324(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the same Act. The court noted that the applicants had …
The applicant, Smt Neha Raj, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C., Kanpur Nagar to decide Criminal Case No. 14586 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 of the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Jaunpur, to decide Session Trial No. 283 of 2021 within the stipulated period. The trial pertained to offences under Sections 147, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (JD)/F.T.C.-I (CAW) in Ghaziabad to decide Complaint Case No.2020 of 2024, which had been pending since 2024 without any substantive hearing. The …
The applicant, Vishnu Dutt Sharma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (JD)/F.T.C.-Ist, Ghaziabad to decide a pending criminal case (Case No.96842 of 2023 arising from Crime No.234 of 2022 under IPC …
The applicant Mukesh Verma filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Meerut, decide a pending complaint (Case No. 2329 of 2026) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Brijesh Kumar Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge (S.D.) in Gorakhpur to dispose of a pending criminal case (Case No. 35891 of 2024, crime No. …
The applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate-II, Jhansi to dispose of a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No. 25184 of 2023). The …
The applicant, Smt. Meena Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi, to decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 2421 of 2024) within the stipulated period. The application listed the …
The applicant, Sudisht Muni Bharti, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Gorakhpur, to dispose of a pending criminal complaint (Case No.17678 of 2022) that involves …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kaushambi, to decide a pending maintenance case (No. 354 of 2025) filed under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The …
The applicant, Smt. Sabeena Sekh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Prayagraj, to decide Maintenance Case No. 393 of 2025 (filed under Section 144, BNSS) within a reasonable time. The …
The applicant, Hasibun Nisha, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C., Gorakhpur to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 21366 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Hasibun Nisha, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (SD)/FTC in Gorakhpur to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 21368 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) of Gautam Buddh Nagar to decide a pending criminal complaint (Case No.2746 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 406 and 504 …
The applicant, Hasibun Nisha, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction that the Civil Judge (SD)/FTC in Gorakhpur decide a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No. 21370 of 2025) within …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Kasya, Kushinagar, to decide Criminal Case No. 762 of 2025 (arising from Crime No. 772 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 of BNS) within a …
The applicant, Smt. Shilpa Kumari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to decide a pending maintenance case (No. 1520 of 2025) within a reasonable time. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra, to decide a pending discharge application dated 16‑12‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 7586 of 2024, which arises under Sections 3 …
The applicant, Ramesh Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Anti‑Corruption Act) in Gorakhpur to dispose of a pending Session Trial No. 517 of 2025 (Crime No. 22 of 2018) …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 20‑08‑2026 passed in Session Trial No. 442 of 2015 concerning offences under Sections 302 and 120‑B IPC. The case had been listed for defence evidence on multiple …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.6, Varanasi, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 29 of 2026) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Smt Raj Bala, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Junior Division or Judicial Magistrate in Jansath, Muzaffar Nagar, to decide a pending criminal case (Case No.2725 of 2024) involving offences …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kushinagar, to decide a pending maintenance case (No. 402 of 2024) within a reasonable time. The High Court noted that the case had …
The applicant, Amit Gupta, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Court‑Ist, Agra to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 3831 of 2020) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The applicant, Prashant Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Court No.6, Varanasi, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 4146 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of …
The applicant, Virendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 154 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of the …
The applicant, Smt. Shahana, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 4, Ghaziabad, to decide a criminal case (case No. 1561 of 2025 arising from crime No. 218 of 2024) within the …
The applicant Abid Pradhan filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash an order dated 07‑08‑2026 passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj, in Crime No.73 of 2026 and to appear through video‑conferencing. The applicant …
The applicant, Smt Babli, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura, to decide Session Trial No. 275 of 2026, which has been pending since 2026, within a stipulated period. The application did …
The applicant, Tejpal Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Sessions Judge, Baghpat, to dispose of Session Trial No. 1477 of 2024 (arising out of Crime No. 563 of 2024 under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 427, 504, …
The applicant, Jameel Khan, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Iglas, to dispose of Criminal Case No.1263 of 2025 (arising from Crime No.163 of 2024) within the stipulated period. The case involves …
The applicant, Vishnu Bawra, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mathura to conclude the inquiry in Complaint Case No. 80117 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 302, 420, …
The High Court entertained an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Smt Gayatri and two others seeking a direction to the Gram Nyayalay, Chauri Chaura, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 2557 of 2018) filed under Section 31 of the Protection of …
The applicant, Smt. Vertika Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a directive to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to decide a pending family law matter (Case No. 651 of 2023) filed under Section 125 of the Criminal …
The applicant Ilma Khan filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Aligarh, to decide a pending domestic‑violence case (Case No. 400 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The …
The applicant, Nisha Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC in Gorakhpur to decide a pending domestic violence case (Case No. 55109 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The …
The applicant, Asif Miyan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash two orders of the Sessions Judge, Rampur, which had denied him the opportunity to cross‑examine PW‑5 (Constable Dheer Singh) and PW‑9 (S.I. Sohan Lal). The applicant …
The applicant, Mohammad Shafiq, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 15104 of 2026) arising from an alleged offence under Section 420 IPC. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued on 16‑07‑2026 in Session Trial No. 1244 of 2026, which arose from Criminal Case No. 364 of 2018 (IPC §§ 420, 448). The applicant contended that he …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 7188 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 191(2), 117 and 118(1) of the same Act. They argued that they had not been arrested …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 5946 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Azamgarh, arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Special Judge (DAA), Kanpur Dehat, in a 2001 criminal case. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the NBW was issued and that the …
The applicant, Gyanendra @ Chhotai, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 152 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of …
Petitioner Sandeep Soni sought to quash an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 filed under sections 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it …
The applicant, Mohit, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 445 of 2018, which involved offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 37767 of 2026) arising from alleged offences under Sections 64(2)(f), 61(2) and 351(3) of the same Act. The application was presented …
The applicants, Ramod Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 26085 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. Instead of contesting the merits, …
The applicant, Babloo Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 188 of 2025) against Laxman and others, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of the IPC. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6719 of 2025) that were based on Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the same Act. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested and that a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1698 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. They argued that they had not been arrested and that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 78 of 2026) arising under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 352 and 351(2) of the same Act. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested and that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 15546 of 2025) arising from multiple offences under sections 115(2), 316(2), 324(2), 351(3) and 333. The applicants argued that they had not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 97432 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, where they were charged under several IPC provisions and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 26‑10‑2018 in Criminal Case No. 5057 of 2018, which was instituted under Section 323 of the IPC. They contended that the magistrate had taken …
The applicant, Pankaj Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1582 of 2025) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj. The charges, filed under Sections 191(2), 115(2), …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1498 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2) and 352 IPC. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a Session Trial relating to a 2013 murder case under Section 307 IPC. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the NBW was issued and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 11 June 2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Prayagraj, which had set aside a magistrate’s dismissal of an application under Section 173(4) of the same Act. …
The applicants, Sonu alias Ajay and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the pending Special Case No. 827 of 2025, which arose from crime No. 967 of 2019 involving offences under the IPC (sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n)) and …
Priyanka filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a July 1, 2025 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, which dismissed her application under Section 173(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for registration of an FIR. The petition sought direct High …
Priyanka Advocate filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat, which dismissed her application under Section 173(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for registration of an FIR. The petition sought direct …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 684 of 2005) relating to offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. …
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued by a Special Judge in a POCSO case. He contended that the warrant was issued without any prior summons or bailable warrant despite being …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita) filed by Yogesh Sharad Kadam, the managing director of Season Worlds, who was charged with cheating offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita) filed by Yogesh Sharad Kadam, the managing director of Season Worlds, who was charged with cheating offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read …
The petitioners, Md. Anish and his son Md. Arif, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 325 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 109, 3(5), 126(2) and 115(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case was based on an informant’s account …
Pritam Kumar, a licensed holder of a minor mineral storage facility, was accused of illegally enhancing the capping capacity of his K. Storage and storing 20 metric tonnes of sand without the Mining Officer's permission, allegedly causing loss to the government. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming …
The petitioner, Sahitya Kumar, owned a truck that was seized by the Mines Inspector of Arwal on the allegation of overloading sand, invoking the Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules, 2019 and 2024, as well as Section 100 of the Criminal Procedure …
The petitioner, Md Khalik Sheikh, was implicated in a case involving alleged child marriages and offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and the POCSO Act after a raid near the Indo‑Nepal border seized two minor girls, two men and a woman. The only link to …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was named in an FIR for allegedly sending obscene photographs and messages to the husband of an informant, thereby disturbing the marital life and mental health of the husband. The informant could not produce the alleged obscene material, rendering the allegation a bald …
The petitioner, Nawal Kishor Singh, was charged under Sections 316(3) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for alleged black‑marketing of wheat and rice as a PDS dealer. He had been in custody from September 2022 to February 2025 and was …
The petitioner, Sunita Devi, was named in an FIR alleging she participated in assaulting police officers and obstructing their duties during a rescue operation. She contended that the allegations were vague and that she had previously been exonerated in a 2019 case, establishing a clean antecedent. …
The petitioners, four residents of Kolhua village, were implicated in an FIR dated 04‑08‑2024 alleging eve‑teasing, theft of a gold chain, assault and threats against a 15‑year‑old girl and her niece. They faced charges under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, including offences of …
The petitioner, Chintu Kumar, was named in an FIR under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 69, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly having a physical relationship with an informant under the false pretext of marriage. The petitioner contended that the relationship had …
Petitioner Abhishek Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 87, 137(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging his involvement in the kidnapping of an informant's daughter. The victim’s statements were contradictory: under Section 180 she claimed she left …
The petitioner, Wazid Khan, was alleged to be part of a mob that assaulted an informant and her family, but he was not named in the FIR and no specific overt act was attributed to him. He faced charges under Sections 191(1), 126(1), 115(1), 109(1) and 74 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …
The petitioner, Raja Kumar, was named in an FIR for multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, based on information obtained from co-accused who were apprehended during a raid. No incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner’s possession, …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 303(2), 317 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for the alleged transport of a stolen buffalo in his pickup van. The prosecution alleged that the buffalo was recovered from his vehicle, while the …
Md. Firoj Alam, a 70‑year‑old PDS dealer, was arrested under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for alleged shortage of wheat and rice and black‑marketing. He contended that the physical verification of his godown was illegal, the grains had already been distributed, no complaint was lodged …
The petitioner was named in an FIR for alleged theft of three motorcycles, two of which were claimed to belong to his family members and were recovered from his premises. The petitioner argued that the police raid was irregular, noting that the seizure list was prepared three days after the raid at …
The petitioner, Md. Munna Ansari, was named in an FIR relating to a Muharram procession that obstructed traffic, leading to a collision and subsequent arson and assault on a bus. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the charges against him were vague and that no specific assault allegation was …
Prem Kumar was implicated in a missing‑girls case after one of the girls, a minor, was found at his house. The FIR, filed under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleged kidnapping and sexual assault, but no specific allegation was made against Prem Kumar. The girl’s …
Vinod Kumar and Suresh Kumar were arrested in connection with a FIR alleging cheating of Rs 2.81 crore for fruit supplies to M/s Maa Chamunda Fruits Centre. The petitioners contended that the dispute was merely a civil matter of unpaid dues and that there was no intention to cheat, citing an earlier …
The petitioners, Bittu Kumar, Vicky Kumar and Deepak Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged assault, robbery and related offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. They applied for bail, fearing arrest, contending that the allegations were vague, the injuries were minor and the …
Ganesh Singh applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74 and 103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he assaulted a girl’s mother who later died. The prosecution alleged that Singh pushed the mother, causing her death, while the …
The petitioner, Birendra Mahto, sought bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging theft of money from an informant's house. He contended that the accusation was false, stemming from a long‑standing drainage dispute, and highlighted …
The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant during a neighbourhood dispute, charged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner contended that the incident was a "free fight" without intent to cause death and that the FIR allegations …
The petitioner, Pradeep Das, was arrested in connection with alleged black‑marketing of rice and wheat under Sections 318(4) and 316(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He contended that the quantities of grain alleged to be in his possession …
The petitioner, Sandeep Ram, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault with intent to cause death under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 109(1) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that the incident was a mutual free fight, that the injuries were simple and …
The petitioners, four residents of Basahiya village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The informant, who is the daughter‑in‑law of petitioner No. 4, alleged that on 7 October 2025 the accused entered …
Ranjit Rai was named in an FIR for allegedly participating in stone‑pelting against police during a protest in Ahiyapur, Muzaffarpur, and was charged under several IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 332, 333, 353, 307, 186) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that the charges were …
The petitioners, named Naresh Bhagat, Rahul Kumar, Manoj Kumar, Hari Narayan Bhahat, Devendra Bhagat and Sujit Kumar, were arrested in connection with a violent incident stemming from a land dispute, wherein the informant and his family were assaulted and valuables were stolen. They sought bail, …
The petitioners, named Naresh Bhagat, Rahul Kumar, Manoj Kumar, Hari Narayan Bhahat, Devendra Bhagat and Sujit Kumar, were arrested in connection with a violent incident stemming from a land dispute, wherein the informant and his family were assaulted and valuables were stolen. They sought bail, …
The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to an alleged assault and robbery on 30 October 2025. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along …
The petitioners, who are family members of a co‑accused in a kidnapping case, filed a bail petition fearing arrest under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that the kidnapping was committed by Ranjit Kumar and two unknown persons, while the petitioners were only …
The petitioners, named Naresh Bhagat, Rahul Kumar, Manoj Kumar, Hari Narayan Bhahat, Devendra Bhagat and Sujit Kumar, were arrested in connection with a violent incident stemming from a land dispute, wherein the informant and his family were assaulted and valuables were stolen. They sought bail, …
The petitioner, Tribhuwan Tiwari, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating of Rs. 50 lakh in a land deal, charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. His counsel argued that the dispute is essentially civil, the money was transferred to a …
The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, was not named in the FIR relating to theft of motorcycles under Sections 305(b), 317(4) and 111(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The only link to him was a statement by co‑accused that he helped them flee, and he has a clean antecedent. The petitioner applied for …
Krishna Yadav was arrested in connection with a diesel theft alleged under Sections 303(2), 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case rested solely on information from a local watchman and villagers, with no diesel or other incriminating material recovered from …
The petitioner, Renu Kumari, a Self Help Group worker, was named in an FIR for alleged misappropriation of Rs.55,29,960 and failure to maintain accounts of eight SHGs, invoking Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC. She contended that she was a scapegoat, that the FIR lacked specific allegations, dates, …
The applicant sought leave to appeal under Section 419(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against a trial‑court order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. While the appeal was pending, the parties entered into a written consensus settlement dated 19 …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested under Section 64 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged rape of a 16‑year‑old informant, who claimed the relationship began in 2022 under a false pretext of marriage. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the relationship was consensual, …
The petitioner, Md Abdul Karim, was named among 33 accused in an FIR alleging that during a Moharam procession with loud DJ music, a motorcycle collided with a bus, after which the petitioner and others set the bus on fire and assaulted the driver. He sought anticipatory bail, citing that a …
The petitioner, Nirmal Kumar, issued a cheque of Rs.20 lakh to the complainant for a land transaction, which was later dishonoured. A complaint was filed under Section 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (equivalent to Section 420 IPC) and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …
The petitioner, Md. Tanweer Alam, was named in an FIR for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bihar Control of the Use and Play of Loud Speakers Act, 1955 arising from a Muharram procession that allegedly obstructed traffic, leading to a bus‑collision, arson and assault on the …
The petitioner, Dipu Kumar, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of a van carrying iron scrap, although his name does not appear in the FIR. He contended that he had no connection with the vehicle or the seized material and that he is a man of clean antecedent. The State opposed his bail …
The petitioner, Parwesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a rape allegation made by his cousin sister-in-law, alleging an incident in 2021 and a delayed FIR filed in 2026. The petitioner contended that the allegation was false, arising from a family dispute, and highlighted the five‑year delay, …
Vibha Devi and Dinesh Ray were arrested in connection with a kidnapping case under Sections 137(2) and 96 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging they abducted a minor for marriage or illicit intercourse. They contended that the allegation was false because the minor was in love …
The petitioner, Subham Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged theft of cash and jewellery from a neighbour's house, under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was based largely on suspicion arising from a neighbourhood dispute, and the petitioner asserted a clean …
The petitioner, Shanawaz Khan, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the illegal possession of prohibited khaira wood under the Indian Forest Act and sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution’s case rested on the claim that a co-accused, who was apprehended with the wood, …
The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Gupta, was named in an FIR for allegedly withdrawing Rs 70,000 from an informant’s bank account and transferring it to his own account via ATM, constituting an offence under Section 420 of the IPC. He contended that he is a vegetable vendor in Delhi and was unaware of …
Vijay Kumar was arrested in connection with an FIR under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault on an informant that caused a head injury and was purportedly intended to cause death. The petitioner contended that the injury was simple, resulted from a single blow, …
The petitioner, Sandeep Pandey, was not named in the FIR relating to a kidnapping case (Sections 363 and 366-A IPC) involving a minor girl. The victim’s statements under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC were contradictory: initially she claimed she left voluntarily and married Santosh Pandey, later …
Mahendra Kumar was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and others with an iron rod and a sharp‑edged weapon during a land‑dispute, allegedly with intent to cause death, and was charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner contended that the incident was …
Applicants Ajay Kumar R Bhartiya and another filed an anticipatory bail application after being charged under multiple sections, which were later dropped, leaving only a charge under section 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, punishable by up to three years imprisonment. The applicants …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly providing false information to obtain mutation of land, claiming sole heir status despite having five brothers. He applied for bail, arguing that his …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute incident where he was alleged to have assaulted an informant and others, causing injuries that were claimed to be inflicted with intent to cause death. The FIR charged him under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya …
The petitioner, Wajid Ansari, was named in a dowry‑related complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty, including an alleged attempt to burn the complainant with a cigarette, for a demand of Rs.50,000. The petitioner's counsel argued that the complaint was vague, lacked medical evidence, and was …
Vishal Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging he outraged the modesty of an informant's daughter and opened fire when confronted. The petitioner contended that the FIR was false, asserting a …
The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, was not named in the FIR relating to a murder case under Section 304(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The informant’s mobile, allegedly stolen, was said to have been sold to the petitioner by a co‑accused, but no documentary evidence or recovery of the phone from …
The petitioner, Rina Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged participation in a violent incident where a golden chain was snatched from an informant, with multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 listed. She contended that she was not involved in the assault, only implicated as a …
The petitioner, Anil Yadav, was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and others with an iron rod and a khanti, allegedly causing head and bodily injuries. He contended that the incident was a "free fight" arising from a land dispute, with both sides sustaining injuries, and argued that the …
The State of Punjab appealed a High Court order that granted regular bail to Balraj Singh, who was accused of directing a heroin trafficking network from inside jail and was charged under Sections 21(c), 29, 61 and 85 of the NDPS Act. The High Court had relied on the length of the respondent's …
The High Court of Gujarat considered an application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Ajaybhai Hamirbai Chauhan seeking regular bail after a charge‑sheet had been filed for offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from …
Hasmat Ali was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 80 of 2026) for possession and sale of illegal liquor under sections 274, 275 of the B.N.S. and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act after police recovered 225 litres of Nepali wine and seized a motorcycle that the petitioner claimed to …
The petitioners, Sanni Kumar and Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Patarghat PS No.36/2026) alleging offences under sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners …
The petitioner, Chandeshwar Manjhi, was implicated in a case (Jaitpur PS Case No. 92 of 2025) for alleged manufacturing and sale of illicit country-made liquor under sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. A police raid …
The petitioner, Jitendra Dhangar, was implicated in a case under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly selling liquor from his house, where police recovered 27 litres of country-made liquor and 7.92 litres of foreign liquor. The petitioner claimed he was not present …
The petitioner, Suresh Paswan, was implicated in an Excise case (No. 2142 of 2025) for alleged offences under sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, based on a confidential tip that led police to recover liquor from a motorcycle and a hut. Paswan contended that he was not …
The applicant, Satyam Sarvjeet Upadhyay, sought transit bail after receiving a notice under Section 35(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an alleged online investment fraud investigated under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Although not named as …
Arun Sahni and Devan Sahni sought bail after being implicated in a case (Saraiya PS Case No. 214 of 2026) for alleged manufacturing of illicit country-made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The police seized 215 litres of liquor from an open location, and local …
The petitioner, Shyam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Barhiya P.S. Case No. 219 of 2025) for alleged assault and theft of Rs. 11,000, with charges under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case is based on a written report by an informant claiming the …
Mahavir Patel (also known as Mahavir Raut) sought anticipatory bail after a police raid recovered 15 litres of Nepali liquor from soil in front of his house. The land does not belong to him and he was not present at the time of seizure; the only link to him is the identification by a local …
The petitioner, Aniket Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act for alleged involvement in the illegal transport of 164.160 litres of foreign liquor seized near a mango orchard. Identification of the petitioner was …
The petitioner, Birendra Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly selling Nepali liquor. Police seized 4.2 litres of liquor from a tin‑shed shop and, based on a boy’s statement, identified the shop as belonging to the petitioner, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 12282 of 2025) arising under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 63 of the Copyright Act. The applicant argued that he had not been …
The applicant, Sher Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 9422 of 2022) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, which involved offences under Sections 420 and 120‑B of the …
The petitioner, Md. Jikaullah, was named in an FIR for alleged theft of buffaloes and related offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Animal Cruelty Act. He contended that he was not present at the scene and was implicated only through statements of a co‑accused, and that the …
Vasudev Singh Bhogta was arrested in a case under Sections 8(b), 20(a)(i) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for alleged illegal cultivation of cannabis. He contended that the land involved was forest land, that his name was supplied by a local chowkidar, and that no …
The petitioner, Raghu Yadav, was not named in the FIR but was implicated in a theft case (PS Case No.40 of 2026) under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged theft of electrical goods and ornaments worth several lakhs, and a witness, Pawan Kumar, claimed to have …
The petitioner, Sudhir Mandal, was arrested under Section 303(2) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged theft of diesel from an informant's vehicle. He contended that he was merely a victim of assault and fled the scene to save his life, arguing that his identification was …
Manju Devi, a beneficiary of the Pradhan Mantri Gramin Aawas Yojana, was named in an FIR for allegedly defalcating Rs 80,000 and was charged under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. She contended that she was merely a scheme beneficiary and not the sanctioning …
The petitioners, three co-sharers involved in a land dispute, were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for assaulting members of the informant's family with iron rods, lathis and a spade on 13 July 2025. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the injuries were simple, …
The petitioner, Neha Devi, a sister‑in‑law (Nanad) of the deceased, was implicated in a murder case (Police Station Case No. 165 of 2025) under Sections 80(2) and 80(3)(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that she, along with others, strangulated the victim and disposed of the …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a domestic‑violence case where the informant alleged cruelty and assault by her husband and in‑laws. Petitioners 1 (mother‑in‑law) and 2 (brother‑in‑law) claimed the allegations against them were vague and that they were falsely implicated, while …
The petitioners, who are the mother, father and elder brother of accused Ankaj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where informant Savita Kumari alleged that the petitioners abused, assaulted and threatened her after she complained about Ankaj's refusal to marry her. The prosecution …
The petitioners, seven villagers, sought anticipatory bail in a case (PS Haspura Case No. 251 of 2025) alleging assault, robbery and related offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that on 28 August 2025 the petitioners attacked the informant's mother, …
The petitioners, Umesh Ray and Tribhuwan Ray, were named in FIR No.366 of 2025 for alleged assault and other offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming the FIR was fabricated due to a personal grudge because they are witnesses in a separate case. Their counsel …
