Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Tribhuwan Tiwari @ Tuntun Tiwari @ Tribhuwannath TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail as the dispute is civil and no money was transferred to his account.

Summary

The petitioner, Tribhuwan Tiwari, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating of Rs. 50 lakh in a land deal, charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. His counsel argued that the dispute is essentially civil, the money was transferred to a co‑accused’s account, and there is no material linking the petitioner to the alleged receipt of funds. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail. The court observed that the amount was not credited to the petitioner’s account and the matter appears to be a civil dispute, and therefore ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite charges under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the underlying dispute is civil in nature, rendering the criminal prosecution unwarranted.
  • Whether there is sufficient material evidence to justify continued detention.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • cheating
  • civil dispute
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • CrPC
  • Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • land deal
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41809 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2026 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Tribhuwan Tiwari @ Tuntun Tiwari @ Tribhuwannath Tiwari, Son of Gautam
                 Tiwari, Resident of Village- Sisai, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Vineet Vinayak, S/o Dr. Vinod Verma, Resident of Village- D.K. Shikarpur,
                 P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Parties
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sitesh Kashyap, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-06-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Shikarpur P.S.

                   Case No.44 of 2026 registered under Sections 316(2),

                   318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘B.N.S.’).

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to cheat the

                   informant for a sum of Rs. 50 lakhs alongwith co-accused

                   persons out of a land deal.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41809 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner that primarily the dispute between the parties are

          civil in nature for which the present criminal prosecution is

          completely unoccasioned and unwarranted. It is pointed out

          that the alleged money was transferred to the account of co-

          accused Sanjay Kumar and this petitioner is not the recipient

          of the money. It is pointed out that with ornamental

          allegation as this petitioner has taken the copy of Aadhar

          card and PAN card, he was implicated with present crime in

          question, without having any cogent material. Explaining

          criminal antecedent, it is submitted that the petitioner found

          involved in one more criminal case of different nature, where

          he is on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as alleged amount prima facie not

          appears to be transferred in the bank account of the

          petitioner, where dispute in issue primarily appears civil in

          nature, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released
                Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41809 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                                            3/3




                          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                          satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Bettiah, West

                          Champaran in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No.44 of

                          2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                          438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short

                          ‘CrPC’)/under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik

                          Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNSS’).


                                                           (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.