Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

759 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

KASHYAP VINOD PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Kashyap Patel was arrested in connection with Crime No.459/2025 arising from a road accident on 20 December 2025 that resulted in the death of Akhtar Rajja and injuries to others. The prosecution alleged that Patel, along with his family, was involved in the incident where a four‑wheeler collided …

GANESH MOHANRAO WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, accused No.2 in FIR No.293/2025, was arrested for alleged involvement in the murder of a husband on 10‑06‑2025, where accused No.1 stabbed the victim after a quarrel. The prosecution alleged that the applicant was present, abused the victim and held his hands, thereby facilitating the …

AZHAR AHMED SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assaulting the informant, his family and damaging property following a dispute that had been settled. The prosecution highlighted serious injuries to the victim, while the applicants argued the incident was …

SAIF KHAN ASIF KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Saif Khan, sought anticipatory bail in connection with an alleged assault involving a knife and a wooden log, charged under Sections 118(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant inflicted a knife wound on the …

PRADUMNA PRADIP CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Pradumna s/o Pradip Chavan, was charged under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for alleged involvement in the suicide of Vaibhav. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had demanded money from Vaibhav, which purportedly led to the latter's suicide. The applicant …

BABAN ASHOK SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, accused of multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 including assault and rioting, were charged for an incident where they allegedly attacked the informant, his family and property following a dispute. The informant’s son and one of the accused had previously settled …

BABAN ASHOK SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assault, damage to property and caste-based abuse following a dispute that escalated on 26 December 2025. The prosecution highlighted serious injuries to the informant and his family, while the applicants …

AVDHUT MACHINDRA THOMBREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Avdhut Machindra Thombre applied for enlargement of bail in a case (Cr. No. 428/2025) alleging sexual assault of a neighbour on 11‑Nov‑2025, charged under Sections 333, 75 and 65 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution highlighted a statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bhartiya …

DATTA BHAGWAT KUTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Datta s/o Bhagwat Kute, was arrested for alleged theft of stainless steel wire valued at Rs.99,000 and charged under Sections 3(5) and 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution's case rests primarily on the testimony of a single witness, Narayan Solanki, while the …

SUKHDEV ANANDA BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Sukhdev s/o Ananda Bhosle, was charged with multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting several persons with an axe, knife, iron bar and other weapons during a quarrel on 26 August 2025. The prosecution argued that the applicant’s use of an axe …

BHAGWAT DNYANOBA MULGIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Bhagwat Dnyanoba Mulgir, sought quashment of FIR No. 304 of 2025, the charge‑sheet and a pending special case alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (including sections 69, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5), 89) and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …

PRADIP BABASAHEB SUKASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Pradip, a 19‑year‑old labourer, applied for bail in a case (Cr. No. 296/2025) alleging offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He was said to have accompanied the main accused, Ritesh, and fled the scene. The defence argued that statements recorded under Sections …

AVINASH GENBA PANDULEversusPRASHANT DADASAHEB ANBHULE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prashant Dadasaheb Anbhule, who was charged under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 39 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2019 for alleged abetment to suicide …

ASIF SALIM SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The court considered bail applications filed by Asif Salim Shaikh and Kishor alias Pappur Bhand, accused in FIR No. 151/2025 for the murder of Matin, who died from a puncture wound caused by an iron nail. The prosecution alleged that the accused, along with others, assaulted the victim in a temple …

KISHOR ALIAS PAPPU PRAKASH BHANDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The court considered bail applications filed by Asif Salim Shaikh and Kishor alias Pappur Bhand, accused in FIR No. 151/2025 for the murder of Matin by a puncture wound from an iron nail. The prosecution argued the offence was serious, supported by post‑mortem evidence and an eyewitness statement. …

MAHESH ALIAS OM KANTILAL CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Mahesh @ Om Kantilal Chaudhari was arrested on 30 November 2025 in connection with a murder‑related case (Cr. No. 673/2025) and a charge sheet was filed on 27 February 2026 alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant contended that there was no …

UMESH PARMESHWAR SONTAKKE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants and the respondent entered into a verified settlement deed, wherein the complainant agreed to withdraw the FIR and related criminal proceedings in exchange for a monetary settlement and mutual consent divorce. The court examined the registrar's verification report and the terms of the …

SHAIKH UMER SHAIKH NASIRODDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Saif Khan Asif Khan, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.146/2025 alleging offences under Sections 118(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant assaulted the complainant with a knife, but the injury …

QUAZI AFFAN AHMED AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Quazi Affan Ahmed and another, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0685 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was based on a complaint by Muskan Salim Pathan, who claimed to be an advocate and …

NITESH VIKRAM JADHAV AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Nitesh Vikram Jadhav and others, sought to quash FIR No. 89 of 2026 filed at Karmad Police Station for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Both parties entered into a settlement, filing a joint compromise and affidavits from the injured persons, Shubham and Nana …

MANOJ MALHARI SOMWANSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Manoj, a 40‑year‑old agriculturalist, was arrested for alleged forcible sexual intercourse with a 40‑year‑old woman (the informant) on 20 March 2026, under sections 64, 64(1) and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The informant claimed the accused entered her house, threatened her and her …

PRAVIN DINKAR KHEDKAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, a husband and wife, filed a criminal application seeking quash of FIR No. 540 of 2025 registered at Ashti Police Station for offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) r/w 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Both parties submitted a compromise deed dated 27.08.2026, …

KISAN DEVRAM GAFALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kisan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of FIR No.0250/2025 and the pending Sessions Case No.69 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 64, 329(1), 329(3), 352 and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, respondent No.2, filed an …

XYZversusQUAZI AFFAN AHMED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Quazi Affan Ahmed and another, were implicated in Crime No. 0685 of 2025 under several offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, based on a FIR filed by Muskan Salim Pathan who claimed to be an advocate and alleged assault, theft and outrage of modesty. The applicants contended …

KHAN MINHAJ ABDUL JALEEL KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Khan Minhaj Abdul Jaleel Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with Crime No. 0169 of 2026, alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that the applicant's brother and …

SANTOSH TARACHAND SHELKE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, involved in a matrimonial dispute, filed a criminal application seeking quash of FIR No. 9 of 2025, the related charge‑sheet and the pending criminal case, alleging offences under Sections 85, 352, 115(2), 351(2), 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. …

SWARAJ KRUSHNA SOLSE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered bail applications filed by three accused (Ritesh Bhausaheb Sonawane, Sunny Chetan Baban Jadhav and Arbaj Asif Kaleem Shaikh) and by Swaraj Krushna Solse in a case involving serious offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Bombay Police Act, the Arms Act and the …

ADITYA EKNATH GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

ALKA NAVNATH RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Alka Navnath Rathod and others, filed a criminal application seeking the quashment of FIR No.98/2025 registered on 13 March 2025 for alleged offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Police Act. The FIR was based on information from a Sub‑Inspector that the …

SHIVAM DILIP CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Shivam Dilip Chavan was arrested in connection with the death of a 19‑year‑old woman who drowned after allegedly being threatened and harassed by him. The prosecution relied on statements of the deceased’s parents and call‑detail records to allege that Chavan instigated her suicide, invoking …

PRITAM VILAS LOKHANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on a hotel informant, resulting in simple injuries to the informant and a witness. The charge‑sheet, filed under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, was completed. The State argued that the accused are habitual …

SACHIN VITTHAL SOLAT AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

YOGESH RAMESH DOIFODEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

GOVIND UMAKANT JADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The original accused applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged forcible sexual intercourse and related offences under Sections 64(1), 74, 296 and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the accused repeatedly forced the complainant, a married woman, to have …

ARBAZ MAZHER KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered two regular bail applications filed by Arbaz Mazher Khan, 20, and Shahrukh Sattar Sayyed, 25, who were charged with offences under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 4/25 of the Arms Act and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act for an …

SAMADHAN BHAGWAN KAKADE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants sought to quash FIR No.118/2025 filed for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the matrimonial dispute with the respondent had been amicably settled, with the husband agreeing to pay maintenance and filing a mutual consent …

PADMAKAR MAROTIRAO SARPATE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Padmakar Marotirao Sarpate and Vijay Padmakar Sarpate, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR alleging assault and theft of a gold chain, offences punishable under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that the applicants, along with …

NAVNATH BHAUSAHEB SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Navnath BhauSaheb Shinde applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 3(5) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging cheating in a marriage‑related transaction. The prosecution alleged that Shinde facilitated the introduction of a girl to the complainant and was …

TANVEER SIKANDAR BAGWANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Tanveer Sikandar Bagwan, was arrested for allegedly assaulting members of another family with a chopper, causing injuries to the head, ear, and neck and a small intracranial haemorrhage. The prosecution contended that the applicant was the principal assailant and that his release …

YOGESH KAILAS LAHANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Yogesh Kailas Lahane applied for bail in Crime No. 355 of 2026 for allegedly supplying milk dangerous for consumption. The court ordered a chemical analysis, which found formalin in the milk and classified it as sub‑standard under Chapter I, Section 3(1)(zx) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, …

SHAHRUKH SATTAR SAYYEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered two regular bail applications filed by Arbaz Mazher Khan and Shahrukh Sattar Sayyed, who were charged under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 4/25 of the Arms Act and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act for an assault that occurred …

RUSHIKESH UTTAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Rushikesh Uttam Patil, was arrested on 17 July 2026 in connection with a large seizure of liquor valued at Rs. four crore from the premises of Hari Om Fiber Pvt. Ltd. The prosecution alleges that Patil owned the premises, permitted a co‑accused to use it, and was to receive proceeds …

RAJSHRI DIGAMBAR CHALWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Rajshri, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an offence under Section 105 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 arising from a domestic altercation that led to her husband's death. The prosecution alleged that after a quarrel, the …

GAURAV ALIAS SHAM RAMNATH BHAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

GAURAV ALIAS SHAM RAMNATH BHAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

GAURAV ALIAS SHAM RAMNATH BHAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

GAURAV ALIAS SHAM RAMNATH BHAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

ANIKET VISHNU MUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Aniket Vishnu Munde, sought regular bail for murder charges under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from the death of Balu, the informant's son, at a hospital owned by Dr. Pramod. The prosecution alleged that Munde, a nephew of Dr. Pramod, …

KRUSHNA BHUJANG KADAMversusTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Krushna Bhujang Kadam applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with charges under Sections 74, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The prosecution alleged that …

MAHEDI RAHIM HANNUREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mehedi Rahim Hannure in connection with criminal case No. 266/2025 alleging assault, robbery and other offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The informant alleged that the applicant broke a …

RAHUL APPA KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Rahul Appa Kale, sought regular bail for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including murder, arising from a violent assault on 5 January 2025 that resulted in the death of Sunil Kale. The prosecution alleged that Kale, armed with a sickle, participated in a coordinated …

TAPESH KIRAN BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Tapesh Kiran Bhosale, was charged under Sections 309(6), 311, 115(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for a robbery and assault alleged to have occurred on 16 September 2025. The FIR described four masked assailants who stole ornaments and a two-wheeler, but the …

SALEEM AJMODDIN SHAIKH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellants were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for assaulting and verbally abusing a scheduled‑caste woman in public view. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that key witness statements were …

KISAN @ KISHAN SADASHIV KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Kisan Sadashiv Kamble filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of Crime No. 354 of 2024, which alleged offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR stemmed from a dowry dispute and alleged …

PRASAD ANIL CHANGULPAYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Prasad Anil Changulpay, was charged with kidnapping and penetrative sexual assault of a 17‑year‑old girl under Sections 137(2), 64(2), 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 8, 12 of the POCSO Act. The victim initially went missing, filed a complaint of kidnapping, …

SHUBHAM DATTATRYA GONDKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The appellant, Shubham Dattatrya Gondkar, was arrested in connection with the death of his father, initially recorded as accidental but later investigated as murder under Section 103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The defence argued that the deceased suffered a prior accident and …

SUNIL UTTAM DHEREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Sunil Uttam Dhere was charged under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for allegedly abducting and attempting to force a marriage with a 17‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the …

HARSHDEEP GULABRAO TATKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Harshdeep Gulabrao Tatke, was arrested in connection with a suicide case under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging abetment of suicide of Roshni, a nursing student. The prosecution claimed the applicant demanded money and harassed the deceased, while the defence …

SAURABH TARACHAND GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Saurabh Tarachand Gaikwad, was arrested on 17 August 2025 in connection with a case alleging child marriage, sexual offences, and the suicide of his wife, who was reportedly a minor at the time of marriage. The prosecution alleged that Gaikwad married the 13‑year‑old victim, demanded …

KAILASH PANDIT CHAVHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Kailash Pandit Chavhan, was charged under Sections 65(2), 351(2), 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 5(m), 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for allegedly sexually assaulting a 10‑year‑old girl. The prosecution narrated that the victim …

SINDHU SHANKARRAO GONDKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Shubham Dattatrya Gondkar was arrested for the alleged murder of his father under Section 103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution claimed the death was a cold‑blooded homicide, citing a plastic pipe recovered from the accused, a post‑mortem report indicating multiple contused …

NAMDEV GANU KAMBLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Namdev Ganu Kamble, a 76‑year‑old suffering from kidney and heart ailments, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 118(2) and 109 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR originally alleged grievous hurt, but after the death of his wife the more serious charge under Section …

MAHESH YADIGIRI MIRIYALAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

The applicant, Mahesh Yadigiri Miriyala, sought regular bail in a case involving murder, attempt to murder and abetment (IPC §§302, 201, 109 r.w. 34) after the death of Bharat, a truck garage owner. The prosecution presented circumstantial evidence, including call records linking the applicant to …

IRFAN MUNIR SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The High Court considered the bail application of Irfan Munir Shaikh, who was charged under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for alleged sexual assault on his minor daughter. The prosecution relied on the grandmother’s complaint, while …

SAGAR DATTATRAY SABALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Rejected

The applicant, Sagar Dattatray Sabale, applied for regular bail in a criminal case (CR No. 193/2025) alleging that he had forcibly committed sexual intercourse with a 12-year‑8‑month‑old girl, who later became pregnant and gave birth. The prosecution presented a complaint, medical examination …

ADHIK PANDURANG TAMBAVEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The petitioner, Adhik Pandurang Tambavekar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 109, 85, 333 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that the incident was a spur‑of‑the‑moment assault and that the investigation is complete with a charge‑sheet filed and the …

VENKETESH RAMESHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Venketesh Ramesh and Girish Venkatesh, who were charged under Sections 305(a), 331(3), 317 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (equivalent to IPC offences of robbery, theft of valuable property and extortion). The prosecution …

RUSHIKESH SOMNATH SHENDAGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The applicant, a 20-year-old B.Sc. student, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with Crime No. 197 of 2025, alleged to involve offences under sections 108, 3(5) and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He sought protection to appear for his university examinations scheduled …

SURESH PRABHAKAR PATIL AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicants, Suresh Prabhakar Patil and Jaya Suresh Patil, were alleged to have cheated a cattle‑feed supplier of Rs.81,46,296 by failing to pay for multiple transactions between July and December 2024. A First Information Report was lodged and the matter was registered as Crime No.0054 of 2026 …

LAXMI RAMESH KHARATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Laxmi Ramesh Kharat, the wife of a deceased man, was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the death of her husband, which she claims arose from a domestic dispute and lack of pre‑meditation. The incident involved the husband, allegedly drunk, assaulting her, …

SUNIL VITHHAL RANJANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

Sunil Vithhal Ranjane applied for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant contended that, as per the Supreme Court’s decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, a notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya …

BHAIRAVNATH VASANT GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The High Court considered the bail application of Bhairavnath Vasant Gaikwad, who was charged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for alleged sexual assault of a minor. The applicant had been in custody for over …

SUNIL DADA ALIAS MAHADEV NARUTEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Sunil Dada alias Mahadev Narute applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No. 10 of 2026 registered at Natepute Police Station, Solapur, for offences under Sections 108, 80, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that …

PRANOT SHIVAJI DHANWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Pranot Shivaji Dhanwade, filed a bail application seeking release on bail for offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Indian Arms Act, 1959. The State objected, stating that any renewal of bail must be made before the trial court. The applicant's …

CHHAYA ARVIND MISALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Chhaya Arvind Misal, filed an anticipatory bail application under section 482 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, seeking release on bail for alleged offences under sections 326(g), 118(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 189(2), 190 and 324(5). The matter was heard before Justice Ashwin D. …

NITIN DEVDAS WALAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Nitin Devdas Wala, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release on bail for offences under sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant's counsel, S. B. Patil, later requested permission to withdraw the bail application …

RAJBAKSH LATIB SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Rajbaksh Latib Shaikh, filed an anticipatory bail application under sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) and 341(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, seeking release pending investigation of FIR No. 331/2026. The State of Maharashtra opposed the application, but no substantive …

DILIP GUNDA SATHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Dilip Gunda Sathe, was charged with assault and homicide under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, following a complaint that he and co‑accused attacked the complainant and others with sticks, stones and other weapons, resulting in the death of Sachin Kamble. The …

RAMAKANT LAXMANT GAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Ramakant Laxman Gawade, sought to have FIR No. 28 of 2025 and the accompanying chargesheet quashed, alleging that the FIR was filed malafidely due to an existing family dispute. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 74, 75(2), 333, 351(2) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, …

MADANMOHAN HARIPAD HAJRAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Madanmohan Haripad Hajra, was charged with sexual assault of a minor girl under Sections 75 and 64(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The prosecution alleged the offence occurred on 10 August …

GOPI KRISHNA @ SHIVAM SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicants, Pramodkumar Rajvanshprasad Chandan & Ors., filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, informed the Court of two antecedent criminal cases registered under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – CR No.1301 of 2025 …

PRAMODKUMAR RAJVANSHPRASAD CHANDAN AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, Pramodkumar Rajvanshprasad Chandan & Ors., filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, informed the Court of two antecedent criminal cases registered under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – CR No.1301 of 2025 …

AJAY ALIAS AJJU YUVRAJ KASBEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) by Ajay alias Ajju Yuvraj Kasbe, who was arrested in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Arms Act, the Criminal Law Amendment Act and the MCOCA Act. …

ADITYA RAJENDRA TAYADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Aditya Rajendra Tayade, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (C.R. No. 197 of 2026) alleging an offence punishable under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …

NAGU SAVALA MIREKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Nagu Savala Mirekar, mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case alleging that she, along with the deceased's husband, had harassed the victim, leading …

SANTOSH SURESH KAKADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Santosh Suresh Kakade in a criminal case registered under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State counsel pointed out that an antecedent FIR (CR No. 162 of 2025) had not been disclosed in the bail …

SANTOSH SURESH KAKADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Santosh Suresh Kakade, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1138 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra raised a contention that an earlier criminal case (C.R. No. 162 of 2025) under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, had …

SWATI SWAPNIL JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Mahadeo Kisan Jadhav and Swati Swapnil Jadhav, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging assault, robbery and other offences arising from a family land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the …

MAHADEO KISAN JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Mahadeo Kisan Jadhav and Swati Swapnil Jadhav, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging assault, robbery and other offences arising from a family land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the …

JAYESH VASANT JAINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, accused No.2, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) read with Section 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that …

AKASH TUKARAM GHATOLE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Akash Tukaram Ghatole & Ors. and Nikhil Suresh Kale, filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in connection with FIR No. C.R. 25 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 308(4), 311, 351(2), 352 …

NIKHIL SURESH KALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Akash Tukaram Ghatole & Ors. and Nikhil Suresh Kale, filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in connection with FIR No. C.R. 25 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 308(4), 311, 351(2), 352 …

ANIKET AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 28.08.2026 under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 110 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners also prayed that the police follow the …

BILAL DASTAGIR KURESHI AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The petitioners, Bilal Dastagir Kureshi and another, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR alleging illegal cattle slaughter, possession of arms, and offences under the IPC. The prosecution narrated a raid on a …

HEMANT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Hemant and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04‑09‑2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …

KAMLAUTI CHAUHAN @ KAMLAWATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlauti Chauhan, the wife of a deceased man alleged to have committed suicide by hanging. The applicant was charged under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abetment to suicide, based on a suicide note and other …

BILAL GULAM MOHAMMAD PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Bilal Gulam Mohammad Patel, owns a scrap shop where an illegal cattle slaughter allegedly took place. He is charged under multiple statutes for permitting his premises to be used for the prohibited act, though he claims no direct involvement and offers cooperation with the …

RAMBHAU NAMDEV KONDHRE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, owners of a property and former partners in Venkateshwara Construction Firm, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Samhita, 2023, in connection with offences under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and the Bhartiya Nyaya …

SMT MISLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt Misla Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 07.06.2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest her. The petition listed several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear before the court, …

SHAIBAZ MOHAMMAD KHALIK KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in FIR No.215 of 2026 for offences under Sections 118(2), 115(2), 324, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that water from the complainant's car …

ROHIT BABUNATH CHAURASIAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Rohit Babunath Chaurasia, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for alleged involvement in a jewellery shop robbery where he was the driver of the getaway car. He was charged under Sections 311, 309(6) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, …

HIREN BHARAT SUMARIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, an employee of Sri Devi Jewellers, was implicated in FIR No. 241 of 2026 for allegedly depositing Rs. 30,00,000 in cash at ICICI Bank, where five Rs. 500 notes were found to be counterfeit. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, contending …

ASHRAF KHAN CHAUDHARY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ashraf Khan Chaudhary and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17 July 2026, registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Mirzapur Police Station, Saharanpur. They contended that the FIR does …

KAMLESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08.07.2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) alleging abduction of a minor. The alleged abductee was later recovered and, in a statement under Section 180 BNS, said she had voluntarily left her …

KAMRAN ALI ALIAS SYED KAMRAN ALIversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kamran Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16 July 2026 under Section 316(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) registered at Police Station Fareedpur, Bareilly. He contended that he was not responsible for the loss of certain records and …

MANJEET AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manjeet and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking the quash of an FIR dated 12‑07‑2026 filed under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners also made an …

ROBINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Robin, accused in Crime No. 142 of 2026 under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (sections 64(1) and 115(2)) and the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) for alleged rape of the informant's daughter. The applicant argued that the victim’s statement …

SUPRIYA PATHAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Supriya Pathak, accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abetment of suicide in a case arising from the death of her husband. The applicant argued that the death was due to antemortem hanging and that she had no …

DWARIKA KANNAUJIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dwarika Kannaujiya, was arrested in a case under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging abetment of suicide following the death of a person by hanging. He contended that he was falsely implicated, arguing that the post‑mortem report, the suicide note, and the …

AAKASH PAWANKUMAR GUPTA AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 1863 of 2026, registered under Sections 318(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, on the ground that the parties had settled their private dispute and wished to withdraw the criminal proceedings by consent. The High Court examined its inherent …

AMIT TIPNISversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 1863 of 2026, registered under Sections 318(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, on the ground that the parties had settled their private dispute and wished to withdraw the criminal proceedings by consent. The High Court examined its inherent …

TIRUMALESH MALLESHAM KATLAversusTHE STATE OFMAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that he forged the complainant’s signature to surrender two LIC policies without authority, invoking sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant contended that he acted with the …

SHUSHMA PARMANAND KATLAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with FIR No. 340 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR was based on …

SAGAR LAXMAN VALVIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Sagar Laxman Valvi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 108, 352, 62 and 356(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that he threatened the …

ATUL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Petitioner Atul Yadav filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 27 June 2026 in Crime No.133, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 353 and 74 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering …

VIJAY SHRIPAD KALE AND ANR.versusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions (WP 2324/2026 and WP 2325/2026) filed by Vijay Shripad Kale & others seeking quash of FIRs registered by the Economic Offences Wing, Banking‑2. The disputes arose from a commercial transaction of Rs. 50 crore and a back‑dated loan agreement of Rs. 3.65 …

ATUL HARKISHAN DAS MEHTA AND ANR.versusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS.

Allowed

The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions (WP 2324/2026 and WP 2325/2026) filed by Vijay Shripad Kale & others seeking quash of FIRs registered by the Economic Offences Wing, Banking‑2. The disputes arose from a commercial transaction of Rs. 50 crore and a back‑dated loan agreement of Rs. 3.65 …

KRISHANPAL CHARANPAL SINGH AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicants were accused of cheating and breach of trust after a monetary dispute, leading to FIR No. 0484 of 2026 under sections 3(5) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The parties subsequently reconciled, the complainant received Rs.30 lakhs and a demand draft of Rs.10 lakhs, and …

KAMLESH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Chauhan, who was accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abetment to suicide of a deceased individual. The applicant, a sister of the second wife of the deceased, argued that the death was a hanging …

TABANK ANSARI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Tabank Ansari and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 24 June 2026, registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and to restrain their arrest. They also prayed that the police adhere to the Supreme Court …

RAJU BHIMRAO BARAVKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Raju Bhimrao Baravkar in connection with a suicide case where the deceased allegedly alleged threats and blackmail by the applicant. The prosecution alleged that the …

ADWAIT VIVEK GATNEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Raju Bhimrao Baravkar in connection with a suicide case where the deceased allegedly alleged threats and blackmail by the applicant. The prosecution alleged that the …

REYAZ AHMAD MATHANJIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Reyaz Ahmad Mathanji, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 28‑02‑2025 and the summoning order dated 03‑04‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, in a case registered as Crime No. 0066 of 2025 under Sections 308(2) and …

HITESH RAMESH GANDHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed three criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 812/2025 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, Pranam Harish Mehta, …

LADULAL HARAKCHAND KANTHER AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered three criminal applications filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIRs registered for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) r/w 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, Pranam Harish Mehta, …

ANIL KUMAR BHERULAL JAGETIYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed three criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 812/2025 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, Pranam Harish Mehta, …

BILAL SHAFI SENDULE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, two of six accused in FIR CR No.- I-236 of 2025, sought to have the FIR quashed by mutual consent with the complainant, who are all family members. The State objected, arguing that quashing by consent could not proceed when only some accused consented. The court examined the legal …

PRAVIN SHRIDHAR PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered three bail applications filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 181 of 2025 concerning alleged fraudulent appointments of teachers and illegal receipt of salaries. The prosecution argued that certain accused …

LAXMAN RADHAKISAN KAMBLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, convicted of offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act for kidnapping and sexual assault of a 15‑year‑old girl, filed an interim application seeking suspension of his life sentence and bail pending his criminal appeal. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, …

SADDAM SHAMSHUDDIN SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Saddam Shaikh, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a charge‑sheet that alleged kidnapping, assault and later sexual offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The victim, a 21‑year‑old woman, …

NANUBHAI HAJABHAI MUNDHAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Nanubhai Hajabhai Mundhava, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Gujarat Police Act. The State opposed bail, arguing the gravity of …

RAJNIKANTBHAI RAJUBHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ranjikantbhai Rajubhai Vasava, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences alleged under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including sections 117(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 54. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of …

MAHESHBHAI S/O RAMESHBHAI VITTHALBHAI DHULSADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Maheshbhai, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including kidnapping. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant’s …

DEVRAM S/O KASHIRAM DHARMABHAI SAVARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed by Devram under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a kidnapping case registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed innocence, had no …

MAYURSINH MAHIPATSINH VAGHELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant’s …

Vipin Mandal @ Shiv Shankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Vipin Mandal and Vishun Mandal, were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including Section 109 for alleged assault with intent to cause death. They contended that the incident was a "free fight" with no intention to kill, citing simple and grievous …

Chandra Kishore Kumar Yadav @ Chandra Kishore KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Chandra Kishore Kumar Yadav and Kartik Kumar, were charged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act for allegedly firing gunshots and assaulting an informant and his brother during a crop-cutting incident. They have been in custody since May 5, …

Md Khalik Sheikh @ Md Khalik Shekh @ Khalik SekhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Khalik Sheikh, was implicated in a case involving alleged child marriages and offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and the POCSO Act after a raid near the Indo‑Nepal border seized two minor girls, two men and a woman. The only link to …

Nagesh Bhuia @ Nagesh BhuiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nagesh Bhuia and Niyoti Devi, were arrested under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly taking three minor children away for an oblique purpose. The children, aged 12, 8 and 7, were recovered and the petitioners were taken into custody on 23 January …

Shrikant Patel @ Shrikant Kumar Raut @ Shrikant RautversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Shrikant Patel, was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Immoral Trafficking Act, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly raping a 14‑year‑old girl over several months. The prosecution’s case is based on the victim’s statement recorded under …

Md. Irshad @ Md. KariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Irshad, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 325, 299 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 5, 6, 6(A) and 6(B) of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The prosecution alleged that a search of his slaughter house yielded 150 kg of …

Meera DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Meera Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (Tiyar P.S. Case No. 07 of 2026) under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged her involvement in the killing of an informant’s husband, while her counsel argued that the allegations were …

Lav Kumar @ Bablu Kumar @ Boublu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lav Kumar, was implicated in a criminal case (Charpokhari PS Case No. 80 of 2026) involving alleged murder, indiscriminate firing and threats, under Sections 109, 61(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that his name was …

BHOLA SAH @ BHOLA KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhola Sah, was arrested in connection with an illegal sand mining case (PS Case No. 102 of 2025) where a tractor carrying illegally mined sand was intercepted and a home guard allegedly suffered a fractured hand during the incident. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he was …

Nawal Kishor SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nawal Kishor Singh, was charged under Sections 316(3) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for alleged black‑marketing of wheat and rice as a PDS dealer. He had been in custody from September 2022 to February 2025 and was …

Sunita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunita Devi, was named in an FIR alleging she participated in assaulting police officers and obstructing their duties during a rescue operation. She contended that the allegations were vague and that she had previously been exonerated in a 2019 case, establishing a clean antecedent. …

Md. Shahid Parvej @ Md. Shahid AkhtarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Shahid Parvej and Md. Nabil Shahid, were charged under Sections 318(4) and 316(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly misappropriating Rs. 10 lakh from an informant’s shop by diverting payments through PhonePe and Paytm. They contended that the alleged transactions …

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Abhishek Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 87, 137(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging his involvement in the kidnapping of an informant's daughter. The victim’s statements were contradictory: under Section 180 she claimed she left …

Moh. Wazid Khan @ Golden KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Wazid Khan, was alleged to be part of a mob that assaulted an informant and her family, but he was not named in the FIR and no specific overt act was attributed to him. He faced charges under Sections 191(1), 126(1), 115(1), 109(1) and 74 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …

Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, was arrested in connection with an assault case alleged to have been committed with the intention to cause death, invoking multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He argued that the incident was a free fight, lacking any intent to kill, and highlighted …

Raja Kumar @ RajaramversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, was named in an FIR for multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, based on information obtained from co-accused who were apprehended during a raid. No incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner’s possession, …

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 303(2), 317 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for the alleged transport of a stolen buffalo in his pickup van. The prosecution alleged that the buffalo was recovered from his vehicle, while the …

Hashim @ Chuman @ Shekh Hasim @ DhumanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner was named in an FIR for alleged theft of three motorcycles, two of which were claimed to belong to his family members and were recovered from his premises. The petitioner argued that the police raid was irregular, noting that the seizure list was prepared three days after the raid at …

Md. Munna @ Munna Ansari @ Md. Munna AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Munna Ansari, was named in an FIR relating to a Muharram procession that obstructed traffic, leading to a collision and subsequent arson and assault on a bus. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the charges against him were vague and that no specific assault allegation was …

Prem KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prem Kumar was implicated in a missing‑girls case after one of the girls, a minor, was found at his house. The FIR, filed under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleged kidnapping and sexual assault, but no specific allegation was made against Prem Kumar. The girl’s …

Vinod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vinod Kumar and Suresh Kumar were arrested in connection with a FIR alleging cheating of Rs 2.81 crore for fruit supplies to M/s Maa Chamunda Fruits Centre. The petitioners contended that the dispute was merely a civil matter of unpaid dues and that there was no intention to cheat, citing an earlier …

MITESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI TRAPASIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the …

KALPANABEN KESHAVBHAI GORADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kalpanaben Keshavbhai Gorad applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The Additional Public …

Md. Iliyas @ IlliyasversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, Md. Iliyas and Md. Lutan, sought relief fearing arrest in a rape case (Amarpur PS Case No. 738 of 2025) filed under Sections 64 and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The FIR named three accused, including their relative Md. Guddu, and alleged …

Ram Babu Sah @ Ram Babu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Babu Sah, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case (Singhaul P.S. Case No. 178 of 2025) filed under Sections 109(1), 352, 351(2), 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he and five others brutally assaulted an informant, his son and grandson. The petitioner pleaded …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested in connection with a FIR (Dharhara P.S. Case No.32 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 132, 109, 121 and 324(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed a country‑made pistol was …

Suganti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suganti Devi, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after a report that her son had been stabbed and she was seen fleeing the scene. She contended that she was falsely implicated, there were no eyewitnesses, …

Ganesh Singh @ Kuttu Singh @ Ganesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ganesh Singh applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74 and 103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he assaulted a girl’s mother who later died. The prosecution alleged that Singh pushed the mother, causing her death, while the …

Birendra Mahto @ Virendra MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Birendra Mahto, sought bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging theft of money from an informant's house. He contended that the accusation was false, stemming from a long‑standing drainage dispute, and highlighted …

Umesh Rajbhar @ Umesh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, nine individuals from Rampur village, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 34 of 2026 filed under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the informant, with specific …

Naresh Kumar @ Naresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant during a neighbourhood dispute, charged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner contended that the incident was a "free fight" without intent to cause death and that the FIR allegations …

Pravesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Pravesh Kumar, was named in a private complaint arising from a land dispute, alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He sought anticipatory bail on the ground of apprehended arrest. The Court examined the Supreme Court precedent in Om …

JOKHU MUKHIYAversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jokhu Mukhiya and Bishwakarma Mukhiya, were named in an FIR for alleged assault causing head and bodily injuries in a neighbourhood dispute, charged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the specific allegation of causing head injury …

Pradeep DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pradeep Das, was arrested in connection with alleged black‑marketing of rice and wheat under Sections 318(4) and 316(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. He contended that the quantities of grain alleged to be in his possession …

Raju KharwarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four brothers, were named in an FIR under BNS sections 103 read with 3(5) for allegedly murdering the son of an informant after a criminal trespass, allegedly stemming from a prior enmity. The petitioners contended that the informant and his wife were not eyewitnesses and that the …

Sandeep Ram @ Chandeep RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep Ram, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault with intent to cause death under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 109(1) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that the incident was a mutual free fight, that the injuries were simple and …

Sonu Sipoliya @ Sonu Sonu Kumar @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sonu Sipoliya and Surendra Baharkher, were named in FIR No. 271 of 2025 under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging a violent assault and attempted murder stemming from a land boundary dispute between agnate parties. They sought anticipatory bail, asserting …

Mukesh Paswan @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mukesh Paswan (petitioner) was named in a private complaint arising from a matrimonial dispute and faced cognizance for an offence under Section 85 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he feared arrest. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in …

Satyendra PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Satyendra Prasad, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 74, 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that he repeatedly assaulted an informant with an iron rod, causing …

Gaurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to an alleged assault and robbery on 30 October 2025. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along …

Mohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, was not named in the FIR relating to theft of motorcycles under Sections 305(b), 317(4) and 111(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The only link to him was a statement by co‑accused that he helped them flee, and he has a clean antecedent. The petitioner applied for …

Krishna Yadav @ Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Krishna Yadav was arrested in connection with a diesel theft alleged under Sections 303(2), 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case rested solely on information from a local watchman and villagers, with no diesel or other incriminating material recovered from …

Sagar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sagar Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly abetting a 13‑year‑old girl’s suicide by forcing her to marry him. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the case was false, stemming from a family feud, and that the FIR did not show …

Chhotelal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, three members of the Yadav family, were charged under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for assaulting an informant and his family in a monetary dispute, with allegations of intent to cause death. They contended that the incident was a mutual fight, that injuries were sustained by …

Ashok yadav @ Ashok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, five Yadav brothers, were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, lathi, and a knife, causing injuries and intent to cause death. They contended that the incident was a mutual free fight, with both sides …

Sandip Das @ Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, named in FIR No.92 of 2025, were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant, causing grievous injuries. They contended that the allegations were false, stemming from prior enmity, and that the injuries were simple in nature. …

Md. Mumtaj @ Md. Mumtaz AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners were arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that they attempted to break a wall, committed theft of Rs.40,000 and jewelry, and threatened the informant's family. The petitioners contended that the FIR was a …

Md. Jalo @ Md. JalilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jalo, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault and related crimes. He contended that he had committed no overt act and that the specific assault allegations were directed at …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested under Section 64 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged rape of a 16‑year‑old informant, who claimed the relationship began in 2022 under a false pretext of marriage. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the relationship was consensual, …

Bahadur MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bahadur Mahto, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging assault, robbery and other offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Mahto and a co‑accused assaulted an informant with a spade and lathi, causing head injuries, and stole …

Bhavesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhavesh Yadav, was implicated in a criminal case (Katoriya P.S. Case No. 215 of 2024) alleging assault, robbery and threats arising from a family dispute over a boundary wall. The prosecution alleged that Yadav struck a woman with an iron rod, causing a fracture, and stole valuables. …

Laxmi RautversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Laxmi Raut was arrested in connection with a shooting on 24 August 2025 that resulted in the death of the brother of an informant. The prosecution alleged that Raut, along with five others, fired pistols, with the FIR charging him under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 …

Mamina KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mamina Khatoon, Saleya Khatoon and Sheikh Jokhu, were named in an FIR under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting a complainant with an iron rod and knife, causing grievous injuries. The FIR was lodged on 8 February 2026 based on a complaint filed …

Satendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, six brothers and a sister-in-law, were named in an FIR for assault, robbery, and outraging modesty under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a dispute in Parsa Bazar. They contended that the criminal case was fabricated to further a pending land title …