Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md Khalik Sheikh @ Md Khalik Shekh @ Khalik SekhversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner, subject to a bond and sureties, and conditioned on surrender within eight weeks.

Summary

The petitioner, Md Khalik Sheikh, was implicated in a case involving alleged child marriages and offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and the POCSO Act after a raid near the Indo‑Nepal border seized two minor girls, two men and a woman. The only link to the petitioner was a confession by co‑accused Anguri Khatoon; none of the minor victims made any accusation against him. The petitioner filed a bail petition asserting innocence, while the State opposed bail. The Court examined the sufficiency of the co‑accused’s confession and the lack of victim testimony, and considered the provisions of Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. It ordered that bail be granted on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to surrender within eight weeks, thereby disposing of the petition in the petitioner’s favour.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite being named in a co‑accused’s confession under Sections 111, 141, 143 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, Sections 9, 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and Sections 8, 12 of the POCSO Act.
  • Whether the absence of any statement by the minor victims against the petitioner defeats the prosecution’s case for continued detention.
  • Whether Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita permits the grant of bail in the present circumstances.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • child marriage
  • POCSO
  • minor
  • confession of co‑accused
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • Indo‑Nepal border

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89648 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- BELA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Md Khalik Sheikh @ Md Khalik Shekh @ Khalik Sekh Son of Oli Sheikh
                 R/o Village - Bherahiya @ Bherrahia, Ward no. 4, P.S. - Bela, Dist. -
                 Sitamarhi.
                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.    Ramnnik Singh Son of Ranjit Singh R/o Village - E - 524, Sainik Colony,
                 P.S. - Sainik Colony, Dist. - Jammu, State - Jammu Kashmir.
           3.    X,    Daughter     of   Noor     Mohammad       Resident  of   Village-
                 Kharbanni@Khairbani, District- Mahotari (Nepal), At present Resident of
                 Village- Barharwa, Ward no.9, P.S.- Dumra, Sitamarhi
           4.     X, Daughter of Noor Mohammad Resident of Village - Barharwa, Ward no.
                  9, P.S.- Dumra, Sitamarhi
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Santosh Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   09-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence under Sections 111, 141, 143 of the

                   Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Sections 9, 10 of Prohibition of

                   Child Marriage Act and Sections 8, 12 of the POCSO Act.

                                3. On a secret information, a raid was conducted and

                   two minor girls, two men and one woman were apprehended

                   near the Indo-Nepal border. During inquiry, it was revealed that

                   girls were minor and were being taken to Gujarat after marrying

                   them with aforesaid two men by Anguri Khatoon (another

                   woman, who was apprehended on spot with these girls).
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89648 of 2025(5) dt.09-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                     petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Name

                     of the petitioner transpired on the basis of confession of co-

                     accused Anguri Khatoon, who was apprehended on spot. In the

                     statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., none of the

                     victim girls has stated any wrong against this petitioner.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail

                     petition.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

                     let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender

                     within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail

                     on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                     District & Addl. Sessions Judge VI cum Special Judge (POCSO

                     Act), Sitamarhi in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 67 of

                     2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the

                     Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                                    (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.