Patna High Court
Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS 2023.
Summary
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was named in an FIR for allegedly sending obscene photographs and messages to the husband of an informant, thereby disturbing the marital life and mental health of the husband. The informant could not produce the alleged obscene material, rendering the allegation a bald one without substantive evidence. The petitioner sought bail, asserting a clean antecedent, while the State contended his active involvement in the crime. The court noted the lack of material evidence and, applying Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties. The bail was granted subject to the stipulated conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the absence of material evidence of the alleged obscene communication
- Whether the provisions of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS 2023 are applicable to the bail application
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 438
- Indian Penal Code — s. 341, 354-A, 384, 506, 509
Subjects
- bail
- obscene messages
- Indian Penal Code
- Section 438 CrPC
- Section 482 BNSS
- evidence
- FIR
- criminal intimidation
- sexual harassment
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42898 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2026 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai
======================================================
Niraj Kumar, S/o Sita Ram Pandit, R/o Village-Suryapur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur,
Distt.- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP
For the Informant : Ms. Saroj Sandilya, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and
apprehending his arrest in connection with Ballia P.S. Case
No.63 of 2026 registered under Sections 354-A, 341, 384,
509 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per FIR, petitioner alleged to send obscene
message/photographs to the husband of the informant,
making him mentally disturbed. It is alleged that the
obscene photograph was captured by brother-in-law of the
informant, namely, Shashi Pandit, while she was in
relationship with him. Petitioner alleged as a friend of Shashi
Pandit and also related with the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42898 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner that admittedly this petitioner was not in
relation with the informant, as said allegation is available
against co-accused Shashi Pandit. It is submitted that as per
FIR, when the informant blocked the number of Shashi
Pandit, this petitioner by using his own phone sent obscene
photographs and message to her husband, which disturbed
her marital life and also the mental health of her husband.
However, it is said through FIR that she could not preserve
the obscene photographs/message as sent by this petitioner
and, therefore, the allegation regarding sending of obscene
photographs through mobile phone is just a bald allegation,
without having any cogent material. The petitioner claimed
clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP duly assisted by Ms. Saroj
Sandilya, learned counsel appearing for informant while
opposing the prayer of bail submitted that this petitioner was
actively involved in present crime in question.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of fact as the informant herself conceded while
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42898 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
3/3
authoring the FIR that the obscene photographs/message as
sent by this petitioner are not available with her, accordingly,
the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or
surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks
from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection
with Ballia P.S. Case No.63 of 2026, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’)/under Section 482(2) of
the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short
‘BNSS’).
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Sanjeet/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.