Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
457 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1814 of 2024) arising from offences under IPC Section 354 and Sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The court noted that the applicant had earlier …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 249 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 74, 351(3) of the BNSS and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 27‑08‑2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, which had rejected a request to release a vehicle. The application was presented before Hon'ble Justice …
The applicant, Piyush Trivedi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 6421 of 2020) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etawah, which involved offences under IPC Sections 153A and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 326 of 2024 arising from a POCSO and IPC offences case. The application challenged the cognizance and summoning order dated 28.10.2024 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 550 of 2025, which arose from an alleged offence under Section 325 of the same Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The applicant …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 7784 of 2025) arising under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. During the hearing, the …
The petitioner, a director and guarantor of a defaulting company, challenged a Look Out Circular (LOC) and a passport endorsement marking his passport as “cancelled without prejudice” that barred his travel abroad. He argued that the LOC was issued mechanically at the request of Canara Bank without …
The petitioner, Nippu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case registered under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that several persons, including the petitioner, were involved in the abduction and killing of two …
The applicant, Radhey Shyam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a narcotics case (NDPS Act, §§8,21) where he was already on bail. He contended that the NBW was issued without first …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of a POCSO case (Special Case No. 900 of 2025) pending before the Special Judge, Kasganj. After hearing, the applicants' counsel indicated that they no longer …
The applicant, a juvenile, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 144 of 2025 pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Ghaziabad, which involved offences under the Protection of Children from …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 122 of 2025) arising under Section 74 of the same Act and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences …
The applicant, Sanjay Kumar Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 893 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 506 and 354‑A of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 693 of 2021) arising from offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. After hearing, the applicants indicated they no longer wished to pursue …
The applicant, Ashok, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1917 of 2020) arising from alleged offences under Sections 354, 354‑B, 506 of the IPC and Sections 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 784 of 2018) arising under Sections 66-D, 66-E and 67 of the Information Technology Act. The court noted that the charge‑sheet had already been …
Petitioners Chandrawati Devi and Rakesh Prasad, the grandmother and uncle of the husband of informant Anshu Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault, poisoning and confinement by the informant's in‑laws. The FIR listed offences under Sections 126(2), 115, 110, 85, 352, 351(2) …
Anand Kumar Paswan was named in an FIR for assaulting the brother‑in‑law of the informant, Ramvilash Paswan, as part of a larger incident involving twelve accused. The petitioner argued that the injuries to the victim were minimal and that the medical report showed only simple injuries to him, …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar, was not named in the FIR relating to a theft and assault case (Sections 379 and 356 IPC) but was implicated through a confession made by a co‑accused while in police custody. He applied for bail, arguing that the implication was merely suspicion and that the …
The petitioner, Afsar Alam, was accused of kidnapping under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita after an informant alleged his daughter was taken to Delhi by the petitioner. The victim later gave a statement under Section 183 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, denying any kidnapping and …
The petitioners, Shankar Kewat and family members, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that they, armed with lathis and iron rods, assaulted a neighbour, injured family members, and stole a locket and cash on 19 August 2025. They contended that the assault allegation was vague, no specific …
The petitioner, Vinod Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that on 15 March 2025 the petitioner was present at the scene where …
The petitioner, Yashwant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, where he was alleged to have assaulted relatives of an informant with a lathi and taken Rs.5,000. The prosecution …
The petitioners, three brothers, were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 74 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly entering a shop, abusing the informant, attempting to outrage her modesty and assaulting her son with a pistol butt. They filed an application for …
The petitioners, a group of relatives residing in Kamalpur, were implicated in a murder case (Laukaha PS Case No.107 of 2025) alleging they assaulted the informant’s husband, who later died. The prosecution alleged the assault caused the death, invoking Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya …
The petitioner, Md. Raja, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case where his car, borrowed by a friend, was seized containing stolen items including goats, a dagger and a roof cutter. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 303(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya …
The petitioner, Ashok Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Police Station No. 368 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, including waging war against the state and assaulting police. The FIR described a mob obstructing traffic, attacking police …
The petitioner, Ashwani Chaudhary, was accused of cheating an informant of approximately Rs. 23 lakh by promising loan facilitation and receiving payments through online modes. The offences alleged against him were under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology …
The petitioner, Gajendra Kumar Ram, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where the FIR alleged he assaulted an informant and his son with a knife and lathi over a land dispute. The petitioner contended that the FIR was a retaliatory counter‑case to an earlier FIR he had lodged, and that the …
The applicants sought quash of a charge-sheet and cognizance order in a case under Section 506 IPC for a threatening letter allegedly dropped at the complainant's shop. The FIR named no specific accused and the investigation produced no witness testimony placing the applicants at the scene, nor did …
The petitioners, three neighbours, were accused in a police case of theft of clothes and assaulting an informant with a blunt object, causing a simple head injury. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, but the petitioners argued that the allegations against …
The petitioners, Ganesh Chaudhry and Usha Devi, were implicated in a case under Sections 103(1), 123 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly administering poison to the informant's son, Bittu Kumar, who later died. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners' son, Raushan Kumar, stole …
The petitioners, Ganesh Chaudhry and Usha Devi, were implicated in a case under Sections 103(1), 123 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly administering poison to the informant's son, Bittu Kumar, who later died. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners' son, Raushan Kumar, stole …
The petitioners, Md Noor Alam and Shadrul, were named among 34 accused in an FIR arising from a Moharram procession during which a motorcycle collided with a bus, after which the petitioners allegedly set the bus ablaze and assaulted the driver. They sought anticipatory bail under the Bhartiya Nyaya …
The petitioners, three women related to the deceased Nitu Kumari, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging they killed the deceased over dowry demands. The FIR alleged that after the marriage, the family demanded dowry and, upon non‑fulfilment, the petitioners tortured and eventually killed …
The petitioners, five members of the Ray family, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where the FIR alleged multiple offences including assault, outraging modesty, and causing grievous injury to a minor. The prosecution claimed that petitioner No.5, Digvijay Ray, assaulted the informant’s …
Ashok Kumar filed a discharge petition under Section 250 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming he was falsely implicated in a violent incident stemming from a land dispute. The incident involved a group of armed men firing indiscriminately, injuring the informant and his wife, and …
The petitioners, a group of co‑sharers involved in a land dispute, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Mehsi Police Station Case No. 237 of 2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with 66 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of accused Ajeet Yadav, who was charged with offences including assault and grievous hurt. The applicant’s counsel argued that the FIR was false, that no specific role was …
The petitioners, Santosh Singh and Chandan Kumar, were accused of assaulting an informant and his family over a land dispute, with injuries described as simple. They sought anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences listed under the Bhartiya …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Prasad, Chairman of a PACS, was not named in an FIR lodged under Section 409 read with 34 of the IPC concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the substantive allegations were directed only at two co‑accused and …
The High Court considered an application for anticipatory bail filed by Mahendra Singh, Subodh Singh and Sachin Singh in connection with Complaint No. 729 of 2024, which alleged offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (including sections 318(4), 406, 61, 115(2), 316(2)) and the Dowry Prohibition …
The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged against them for assaulting an informant amid a long‑standing land dispute. The informant alleged that the petitioners, along with others, intercepted his motorcycle and beat him with sticks, causing grievous injuries. …
The petitioner, Pramod Manjhi, was accused in a land‑dispute assault case (Police Station Bodhgaya Case No. 552 of 2024) involving charges under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that the petitioner and others, armed with lathis and other weapons, assaulted the …
The applicant, Jaipal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the charge‑framing order dated 25 March 2019 passed by the Sessions Judge, Shamli, which had framed charges under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amroha, on 18‑Jan‑2021 in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The …
The petitioner filed an application under Section 582 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an FIR registered in 2011 for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The application was presented nearly fifteen years after the FIR was …
The petitioner, Kush Kumar Pathak, was accused in Arwal Police Station Case No. 261 of 2024 of using a fake Instagram ID to send a forged FIR copy, threaten the informant and his wife, and demand money. The petitioner contended that the allegations were fabricated in retaliation for complaints he …
The petitioner, Praveen Kumar Jha, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order of the District and Additional Sessions Judge that rejected his discharge petition under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the order …
The applicant, Sanyogita Rao, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 21255 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 307 and 212 of the IPC. During the hearing, the applicant’s …
The applicant, Pradeped Kumar Sirohi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 585 of 2025) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Ghaziabad. He argued that he was never arrested and that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.4217 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the charge‑sheet …
The applicant, Govind, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release from four separate criminal cases by furnishing a single personal bond and two sureties. The four cases involved offences under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. and one case under …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Ramesh Yadav and another seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 294 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia, which involved charges …
The applicant, Rajeev Ahirwar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 47306 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 279 and 304-A of the IPC. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 246 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the same Act. The counsel argued that the applicants had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order dated 20 January 2026 of the Sessions Judge, Baghpat, which had dismissed their preliminary objection to the framing of charge in a criminal case under Sections 109(1) and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 15187 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bijnor. The application aimed to nullify the cognizance and summoning order dated …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 186 of 2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur. The charges involved Sections 115(2), 351 and 352 of the same Act. …
The applicant, Deepak @ Madan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2149 of 2023) arising from alleged offences under Sections 323 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant admitted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 76152 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 354‑Kha and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. During the hearing, the …
The applicant, Kishan Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 42 of 2021, Crime No. 256 of 2020) pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur, which involved offences under IPC sections …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 560 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the same Act. They argued that they had not been arrested and that the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and related proceedings issued in criminal case No. 1476 of 2010. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the warrant was issued and that no summons or …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 45720 of 2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, where they were charged under several provisions of the same Act. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a notice‑cum‑order dated 19‑12‑2025 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Sikandrarao, Hathras, which was passed on a printed proforma under Section 107/16 of the BNSS/Cr.P.C. The …
The petitioners, three residents of Mangalwara, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Srinagar PS Case No. 152 of 2024) that alleged their involvement in assaults and theft under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution’s FIR described a series of violent …
Ajit Kumar and Munna Kumar, agnates involved in a long-standing land dispute, were named in FIR No. 487/2025 for alleged assault and other offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. They filed an anticipatory bail application, contending that a prior FIR filed by them (No. 486/2025) preceded the …
The petitioners, six villagers from Reriya Khurd, were accused of assaulting the younger son of an informant at a petrol pump, resulting in simple injuries. They filed an anticipatory bail application, arguing that the dispute was a local quarrel, a counter‑case exists against the informant, and the …
The petitioners, three women from Arwal, were implicated in a police case alleging assault with iron rods and theft of a gold mangalsutra, invoking several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that the allegations were fabricated due to a business rivalry involving their husbands …
The petitioners, Sachin Kumar and Rajlakshmi Kumari, were implicated in a case arising from a missing teenage girl who was alleged to have been with Abhay Kumar and Shankar Kumar, the latter being the petitioners' son and brother respectively. The FIR under Sections 96, 137(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) …
The petitioners, Saroj Paswan and Pappu Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault, robbery and threats. The FIR alleged that on 19 July 2025 the accused attacked an informant and his family with a …
The petitioner, Md. Jahangir, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case registered under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, where the victim was his alleged co‑accused's husband. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a conspiracy to murder, …
The petitioner, Kallol Mukherjee, an Assistant Director (Sales) of Nexxbase Marketing Pvt Ltd, was named in an FIR under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34 for allegedly being involved in a smart‑watch supply dispute with MKS International Trade and Corporate Solution. He contended that the matter was a …
Ganesh Rai was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol was recovered from a motorcycle near Barharwa village. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no weapon was found in his personal possession and …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was named in an FIR for allegedly taking a nude video of the informant under the false pretext of marriage, alleged to have occurred in February 2021. The complaint was filed on 9 September 2024, resulting in a three‑and‑a‑half‑year delay, and the petitioner contended …
The petitioner, Md. Nirale, was arrested in connection with a case alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18‑year‑old girl, his alleged daughter, under IPC sections 363, 366‑A, 354 and POCSO Act section 8. The victim, while recording a statement under Section 164 CrPC, denied any kidnapping or …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating related to a land sale, invoking several offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He contended that the dispute was essentially civil, having already executed a sale deed, and highlighted his clean antecedent. The State …
Alok Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant for illicit intercourse or marriage. The petitioner contended that the incident was a child marriage with the consent of …
The petitioners, Nilambar Yadav and Chandan Yadav, were arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 329(4), 75, 76, 126, 115(2), 303(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly climbing a wall, entering a neighbour's house and attempting rape, followed by assault …
Aquib Hashmi was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he cheated the informant's daughter of gold jewellery worth Rs.15 lakh, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner contended that the relationship was consensual, the jewellery was …
Shankar Yadav sought bail fearing arrest in case 335C2/2013 filed under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act for alleged encroachment of 0.14 acre of forest land, causing a loss of Rs.85,120. The prosecution alleged the encroachment, but the petitioner's counsel highlighted a four‑year delay between …
Manish Kumar, the petitioner, was not named in the FIR relating to a theft of valuables worth Rs.2 lakh registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He was implicated solely on the basis of a confessional statement made by a co-accused, Mithilesh Kumar, who alleged that …
The petitioners, three residents of Dhuriya in Madhepura district, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They argued that the FIR only specifically implicated another accused, Manoranjan Kumar, for a …
The petitioner, Md. Ashif, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 352 and 351(3)/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault and theft. He claimed the allegations were false, arising from a land dispute, and that the FIR lacked an …
The petitioner sought bail after the police alleged his involvement in a pistol‑waving incident at an orchestra program, invoking Section 25(9) of the Arms Act and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The allegation arose from a social‑media video and an informant’s identification of the …
The petitioner, Yuvraj Yadav, was accused of having an illicit relationship with the complainant's wife, eloping with her, two children, and jewelry worth Rs.3,15,000. The complaint was lodged four months after the alleged incident, without a satisfactory explanation for the delay. The petitioner …
Abhinav Kumar was named in an FIR for assault and firearm injury to the son of an informant, with alleged caste‑based abuse. The court found that the firearm injury and caste slur were attributable to co‑accused Vishal Kumar, not to the appellant, who was merely present. The appellant argued that no …
The petitioners, Amit Ray and Golu Ray, were arrested in connection with a criminal case (Bhagwan Bazar PS Case No. 569 of 2025) involving alleged firing of weapons that resulted in injuries and the death of a person. The prosecution alleged that three other accused fired the weapons, while the …
The petitioners, Rita Devi and Dilkhush Paswan, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. They argued that the FIR specifically alleged assault by bamboo only against co‑accused Manish Paswan, and that there was no allegation of assault …
The petitioner, Ashok Paswan, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the FIR only specifically accused co‑accused Vicky Kumar of assault with a sword, while Paswan was merely alleged to have been present at the scene …
Sonu Kumar petitioned for bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a criminal case (PS No. 209 of 2025) involving alleged forgery and land fraud under several sections of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that co‑accused Jagdish Sah, together with …
The petitioner, Iqbal Miya, was named in an FIR for alleged assault and related offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a dispute over gas cylinder dues. He applied for bail, contending that the assault allegation pertained only to a co‑accused, Sabbir, and that the injuries …
The petitioner, Shaziya Khatoon, sister of a deceased man, was named in an FIR under Section 103 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged involvement in his murder, which she claims was actually a suicide stemming from a family property dispute. She contended that she was …
The appellants, a group of Yadavs and others, appealed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act to set aside a district court order that had refused them bail in a case arising from a land‑dispute‑related clash. The FIR alleged assault, …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Singh, sought bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 592 of 2025) where the FIR alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner argued that the FIR specifically implicated co‑accused Prashant Singh …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly pointing a pistol at an informant's son while intoxicated. The FIR states the pistol was fired …
The petitioner, Yugal Singh, was implicated in an NDPS case alleging illegal cultivation of cannabis on land he claims is forest land, with no narcotic substance recovered from him. He contended his innocence, asserting false implication by a local chowkidar and a clean antecedent. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Jai Karan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and sexual assault case involving the minor daughter of an informant, under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The victim, however, recorded a statement under Section …
The petitioners, a group of agnate family members, were implicated in a violent incident on 13 June 2023 during a land dispute, during which they allegedly assaulted an informant and his brother with weapons, caused injuries, stole a wrist‑watch and damaged a hut. The prosecution charged them under …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from Vaishali district, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault with a sword on an informant and his son. The prosecution alleged that on 10 October 2025 the accused …
The petitioner, Teja Ram, proprietor of a hotel, was implicated in an NDPS case for alleged possession and sale of 1.7 kg of opium recovered from a nearby abandoned hut. He contended that the hut did not belong to him, was 200 metres away from his premises, and that the quantity was below commercial …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from Ward No. 11, Araria, sought bail fearing arrest in a case concerning illegal sand mining. The prosecution alleged that during a raid on 5 December 2024, the petitioners were involved in the forcible release of seized tractors and assault on police, …
Usha Kumari appealed the acquittal of three accused under the proviso to Section 413 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that they had assaulted her and her brother with a firearm on 20 June 2017. The trial court had acquitted the accused on the ground that the prosecution failed …
The petitioner, Himanshu Kumar, was named in an FIR relating to a sexual assault case involving a 14‑year‑old victim, where the FIR specifically alleges that Prince Kumar, son of Chandra Kishore Singh, committed penetrative rape. The petitioner contended that no allegation of penetrative assault was …
The petitioner, Ram Milan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging theft of two motorcycles and charged under Sections 112, 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). He claimed innocence, stating that no stolen articles were found in his possession, and had …
The petitioner, Jilajit Kumar, was charged under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly abducting and shooting the informant’s son. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that the informant was not an eye‑witness, and …
The petitioner, Roushan Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 80 read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for the death of the informant's daughter, who allegedly died after being assaulted. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the death was due to natural causes following a cesarean …
Ekbal Miya was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant, his daughter, and kidnapping the informant's minor daughter for marriage, under several IPC sections and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, being only the father of the main co-accused, and pointed to …
The petitioners, five residents of Rashidpur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple IPC sections for a vehicular incident that resulted in a death and subsequent village protest. The informant reported that a vehicle had struck a person, leading to villagers …
The petitioner, Bhim Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 309(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, concerning the loot of a Mahindra tractor. The FIR named two persons and four unknowns; the petitioner’s name only emerged during investigation and no stolen property …
The petitioner, Rupesh Singh, sought bail after being made an accused in a case under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, based solely on a confessional statement of co‑accused Subhash Kumar who was apprehended with arms. No weapons or ammunition were recovered from the petitioner and he …
The petitioner, Madhav Yadav, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case registered under several offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, later amended to include Section 109. The FIR alleges that, on the instigation of co‑accused Atma Yadav, the petitioner and nine others assaulted an …
The petitioner, Rajesh Yadav, filed a bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR indicates that the co‑accused, Manish Kumar, inflicted a firearm injury that caused the death of an …
Aman Kumar and Dilkhush (Prince Kumar) sought anticipatory bail after an informant alleged that they, along with others, assaulted his wife, stole a gold chain and cash, and attempted to kill him with an iron rod during a family dispute over electricity connection. The petitioners argued they were …
Kumari Kiran Prajapati applied for bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, including assault and homicide. She contended that the FIR does not identify her as the assailant of the deceased, asserting that she only …
The petitioner, Md. Shabbir, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and that his alleged involvement was the result of a money dispute, …
Petitioners Ravi Shankar Sah and Swati Devi sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that on 19 June 2025 the daughter of an informant was kidnapped by co‑accused Navin Kumar, Samso Kumar …
The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought bail in a murder case registered under Sections 103(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, based on an informant's report that his brother was killed. The informant, Mohan Kumar, was not an eye‑witness and did not disclose how he learned of the alleged …
Mukesh Kumar, accused under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 61.150 kg of ganja recovered from a co-accused's house, sought bail after being in custody since 16‑06‑2025. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, surrendered voluntarily, and that the …
Kamlesh Ram petitioned the Patna High Court seeking bail in a criminal case (PS Gurua Case No. 393 of 2024) where he is alleged to have been the order‑giver in an assault that resulted in the death of an informant's brother. The FIR charges him under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, …
The petitioner, Nirmal Drolia, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a criminal case (PS Case No. 619 of 2024) alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including fraud and causing grievous hurt. The informant claimed that Drolia had fraudulently sold …
The petitioner, Md. Rahil, was implicated in a land‑dispute incident where he and others allegedly assaulted an informant’s family, resulting in the death of the informant’s husband. The FIR lists several offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, but the petitioner contends that the FIR contains …
The petitioners – Usha Devi, Neha Kumari and Akshay Kumar – sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault on an informant and his brother, the latter of whom later died. The prosecution’s case specifically implicated …
The petitioner, Ramakant Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case arising from a fight between two groups at a dance programme, which resulted in injuries. The prosecution charged him under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioners, three brothers, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. They argued that the FIR only specifically implicated other co‑accused for assault, and that the allegations against them were general …
The petitioners, four residents of Maranga, Purnea, sought bail after apprehending arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 111(2) and 109 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that the FIR only alleged assault against co‑accused and that …
The petitioner, Manohar Kumar Jha, sought bail after being implicated in an NDNDPS case involving the recovery of 600 litres of codeine syrup from a pick‑up van. Co‑accused identified him, but he asserted that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle and had no involvement in the …
Awadhesh Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court for bail after being named in an FIR alleging that he and nine others assaulted the husband of an informant during a land dispute, resulting in the husband’s death. The petitioner argued that the post‑mortem report showed no external injuries, …
The petitioner, Jitendra Singh, sought relief fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to the alleged murder of his grandfather. The FIR, filed by an informant named Raju Kumar, alleged that the petitioner and other accused were …
The petitioner, Faiyaz Quraishi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 323, 353, 435 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have arisen from a protest on NH‑1 and a vehicle arson. The prosecution’s case is based largely on CCTV …
The petitioner, Jyotish Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cyber‑related offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, based on information obtained from co‑accused persons during a raid. No incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Syamkant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (Kotwa PS Case No. 95 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. He alleged that the incident was a mutual free‑fight arising from a neighbourhood dispute, and that …
The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar (also known as Suman Kumar Yadav), was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 28-11-2024 alleging that he and other accused, armed with weapons, assaulted the informant's son and attempted to kill him. The petitioner contended that the incident arose from a family …
The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 309(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly threatening an informant with a pistol and stealing Rs.72,875 along with other valuables. He contended that his inclusion resulted solely from the confessional statement of co‑accused …
The petitioner, Jata Shanakar Yadav, was named in a complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty under Sections 498-A, 323, 436, 307 and 326 of the IPC following the birth of a female child. The petitioner contended that the dispute had been settled by the local panchayat and that the complainant …
Rajan Kumar Sharma was named in a 2020 complaint alleging cruelty and dowry harassment under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 341 and 506. He contended that his wife habitually files false criminal cases and that an earlier police case (Bodh‑Gaya PS Case No.398 of 2020) was closed with a closure report. The …
Rabindra Yadav was named in an FIR for alleged physical and mental cruelty under Sections 498-A, 341, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, stemming from a demand for Rs.2 lakh and a Bolero vehicle. The petitioner argued that the cruelty allegations were vague, …
The petitioner, Md. Yeshan, a driver employed by St. Paul School, was named in an FIR for alleged theft of a Bolero Jeep (registration BR-31PA-7513) under IPC sections 379 and 420. He claimed the vehicle was on hire to the school and that he had promptly reported the theft to the police, but no FIR …
The petitioner, Aditya Kishore, was arrested in Mahila Police Station Case No.19 of 2023 on charges of mental and physical cruelty and dowry harassment under various IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act sections. He filed a bail petition, contending that the allegations were vague and that he and the …
Santosh Kumar (Petitioner) was implicated in an FIR dated 19-11-2025 alleging assault on an informant’s father with an iron rod, along with several other offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner filed an anticipatory bail application, contending that the FIR’s allegation of a …
Ashish Kumar, a scrap dealer, was apprehensive of arrest in a case registered under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged theft of iron plates from an informant's plant. The FIR alleged that the stolen plates were recovered from a tractor, but the …
The petitioners, four Yadav brothers, filed a bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to assault, rioting and other offences arising from a land dispute. They contended that the specific assault allegations were directed …
The petitioners, Tarik and Ahamad, were accused of assaulting an informant's parents with a sharp-edged weapon and iron rod during a land dispute, leading to charges under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. They filed a bail petition fearing arrest, asserting that the injuries were …
Munna Singh applied for bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after a raid on the alleged Mamta Clinic which was claimed to be operating without registration or licence. The petitioner contended that he is not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Amrendra Paswan, a PDS dealer, was charged under Sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for allegedly embezzling subsidised wheat and rice and selling it in the black market. He contended that the alleged discrepancy …
The petitioners, six members of the Chauhan family, were named in an FIR for alleged assault, robbery and other offences arising from a quarrel on 30 September 2025. They sought bail, fearing arrest under Sections 115(2), 109, 117(2), 303(2), 191(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The …
The petitioners, Inamul Ansari, Md. Sayuf Ansari and Rahmat Ansari, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that the specific assault charge pertained only to co‑accused Yakub Ansari, while the petitioners faced only a general, omnibus …
The petitioners, a group of residents from Chakmath village, were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting a neighbour, injuring family members, and stealing a locket and cash. They contended that the allegations were vague, stemmed from a petty …
The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, sought bail after being charged under Sections 126(2), 352, 351(2), 308(2), 308(3) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly threatening an informant with a pistol. He contended that the case was fabricated as retaliation for a financial dispute in …
Kameshwar Prasad Sharma, Chairman of Pawa PACS, was not named in the FIR relating to the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.50 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown in Nalanda. The petitioner argued that the allegations of conspiracy were directed only at two named …
Balram Singh, Chairman of Kariyanna PACS, was implicated in a FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR names Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as the primary accused for the alleged loss of …
Vijay Krishna Prasad, Chairman of Lohara PACS, was implicated in a FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.5 quintals of custom milled rice from a State Food Corporation godown. The FIR, filed under Sections 409 read with 34 of the IPC, named only two …
Bhola Prasad, the Chairman of the PACS of Malti Panchayat, was implicated in an FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning the alleged misappropriation of rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR charges under Sections 409 read with 34 of …
The petitioner, Shashi Raj Kumar, PACS Chairman, was not named in the FIR relating to the alleged misappropriation of rice from a State Food Corporation godown, where two co-accused were charged under Section 409 read with 34 of the IPC. He contended that the allegations were solely against the …
Shayamdev Prasad, Chairman of Nahub PACS, was implicated in a 2017 FIR concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR alleged offences under IPC Section 409 read with Section 34, and the investigation focused on two named …
Bhagamani Devi was arrested in connection with a dowry death case (Section 304‑B IPC) alleging her involvement in the death of an informant's daughter over a buffalo demand. The petitioner argued that the allegation was based solely on suspicion, that the informant was not an eye‑witness, and that …
Ram Prasad Singh, Chairman of Cheran PACS, was not named in the FIR relating to the alleged misappropriation of 16,768.5 quintals of custom milled rice from the State Food Corporation's godown in Nalanda. The FIR, filed under IPC sections 409 read with 34, named only Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as …
Balram Singh, Chairman of Kariyanna PACS, was implicated in a FIR (Laheri PS Case No.279 of 2017) concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The FIR names Ranjit Kumar and Abhay Kumar as the primary accused for the alleged loss of …
The petitioners, Prabhu Ram and his sons Tinku Kumar and Sintu Kumar, were implicated in a land‑dispute‑related assault case (PS‑Bihta Case No. 788 of 2025) and faced charges under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 34 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. They alleged that the allegations were …
The petitioners, Md. Yasir and Md. Khalid Hussain, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, including assault and related crimes. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted the informant's mother and later …
The petitioners, seven residents of Surangi village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a dispute over the installation of solar lights …
The petitioner, Shatrujeet Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating of Rs.1,62,000 under IPC sections 323, 406, 420 and 34. The complainant claimed the petitioner failed to provide a promised dealership, but the petitioner’s counsel argued the matter was essentially civil and had been settled …
The petitioner, Sandip Manjhi, was named in an FIR for alleged kidnapping of a 16‑year‑old girl with intent to commit illicit intercourse or marriage, under IPC sections 366‑A read with 34 and POCSO Act section 8. He sought bail, contending that the primary allegation of sexual assault pertained to …
Ravi Kumar was named in an FIR under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 498‑A of the Indian Penal Code for alleged physical and mental cruelty after the birth of a female child and for demanding a four‑wheeler vehicle. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the allegations were vague, arose after ten …
The petitioner, Pappu Giri, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the murder of the informant’s son, Shyamakant Giri, under Sections 103(1), 238(a) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The informant claimed the petitioner and a co‑accused, Neetu Giri, …
Saheb Paswan applied for bail after apprehending arrest in a case registered under Sections 109, 103, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that co‑accused Md. Nehal shot the informant's son, Tarkeshwar Paswan, and injured Krishna Paswan, but the …
Krish Kumar filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, where an informant alleged that he and co‑accused killed her son. The petitioner's counsel argued that the informant was not an eye‑witness and …
Arvind Kumar Sah was arrested in a case registered under Sections 108, 3(5) and 120(B) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, based on allegations by an informant that he and co‑accused had tortured the informant's husband, forced the closure of his C.S.P. centre and that the husband subsequently …
The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from an assault that led to the death of a boy. The FIR, lodged on 26‑08‑2025, named three individuals and 15‑16 unknown persons, but did not name the petitioner; his …
Ramvatiya Devi, the wife of Bharat Yadav, was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and his family, resulting in the informant’s mother’s death. She contended that the incident stemmed from a long‑standing land dispute and that the prosecution’s case was weak, noting that the post‑mortem …
The petitioner, Rocky Prasad, sought bail in a murder case registered under Sections 103(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case is based solely on an informant’s report alleging that the petitioner and others murdered the informant’s brother, but the informant is not …
The petitioners, relatives of a co-accused, sought bail after being apprehended in a case registered under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for the alleged murder of a husband. The FIR, filed three days after the incident, alleged that the co-accused Moti Rajwar had taken the …
The petitioner, Gopal Pandit, was apprehended for alleged involvement in the murder of Manish Kumar and the subsequent concealment of the dead body, as alleged in the confessional statements of co-accused Ankit Kumar and Rajesh Kumar. He faces charges under Sections 140(3), 103(1), 238, 61(2) and …
The petitioner, Khurshid Mansoori, was arrested in connection with a case alleging defalcation of Rs.5,89,342 from Rs.12 lakh received for the Jal Nal Yojna, charged under Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC. He contended that the cheque was jointly signed with co‑accused Salma Bibi and that the entire …
Md. Nazam was named in a complaint alleging an attempt to rape a 15‑year‑old girl on 27 July 2019, with the complaint filed on 30 July 2019 and later linked to a criminal case (C.R. No.64 of 2019) involving offences under the IPC and POCSO Act. The petitioner filed an anticipatory bail petition in …
The petitioner, Sonu Jha, was arrested in connection with a case alleging cruelty and dowry demand under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the alleged demand of Rs. 1 lakh was for a business venture, not dowry, and that the …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar Roy, a manager of Puja Sewa Sadan, was implicated after a drug inspection on 29‑08‑2024 uncovered medicines and 396 antigen kits marked 'not for sale' and lacking a valid licence. A complaint was filed under several provisions of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, and the …
The petitioner, Rajdeo Ram, a PDS dealer, was charged with embezzling Rs.4,76,191 of government‑subsidised food grains under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 7 of the E.C. Act. He contended that the e‑POS machine malfunctioned, he had lodged a complaint with …
The petitioners, Ranjeet Verma and his son Abhishek Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged forgery of a sale deed and related offences. They claimed the transaction involved a forged deed, payment of Rs. 10.60 lakh, and …
The petitioner, Arjun Sah, sought bail after his godown was raided and counterfeit items were recovered, leading to charges under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act. He contended that he is innocent, resides in Assam, has no involvement in manufacturing the alleged counterfeit goods, and that …
The petitioners, members of the family of co-accused Nandan Mukhiya, sought bail after being apprehended in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, including serious offences such as rape. They contended that the allegations against them were limited to simple …
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault on an informant and her family. The prosecution alleged that Urmila Devi obstructed and abused the informant, while her relatives, including Salen Kumar Yadav and …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar Yadav, was named in a complaint (Case No.1191 of 2022) alleging cruelty under Section 498-A of the IPC for demanding Rs.1 lakh and a motorcycle as dowry. The petitioner contended that the allegations of physical assault and dowry demand were vague and omnibus. The …
Ashwani Kumar was arrested in connection with a dowry‑related cruelty case under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Sec. 85 read with 3(5)) and the Dowry Prohibition Act (Secs. 3 and 4). The FIR alleged that he demanded Rs.1 lakh and a motorcycle, and that the complainant was ousted from the …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Rawat and Jitendra Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC (now BNSS) in connection with FIR No.794/2024 alleging assault with bricks and alleged firing, charged under Sections 125(a), 351(2), 351(3), 191(2), 190 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute‑related incident where he allegedly assaulted an informant with an iron rod and fired a weapon, leading to multiple injuries. He faced charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 504 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …
The petitioners sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant's wife, disrobing her and stealing jewellery. They contended that the FIR was lodged after an unexplained one‑month delay and that the charges …
The petitioners, owners of trucks seized by police, were charged under Sections 188, 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code after their drivers allegedly removed the trucks without their knowledge or consent. They filed an anticipatory bail petition, asserting that they had no participation in the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, was arrested in connection with a dispute over water drainage that escalated into a violent clash (Maarpit) resulting in injuries to both parties. He faced charges under multiple sections (115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 303(2), 352, 3(5)) of the Bhartiya Nyaya …
The petitioners, Ammi Devi and her daughter Sunita Kumari, sought bail after being implicated as co-accused in a criminal case (PS Case No. 46 of 2025) involving kidnapping, rape, extortion and related offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that the primary accused, Raushan …
The petitioners, Chotu Yadav and Pappu Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 305(e) and 317(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged illegal sand mining from the Naki river. The informant’s report, based on villagers’ statements, named the …
The petitioner, Chandeshwari Mehta, was accused of embezzling Rs. 7,31,049 allocated for a government godown construction, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He claimed that the entire amount had already been deposited in the Purnia District Central …
The petitioner, Digvijay Narayan, a revenue employee, was named in an FIR alleging his involvement in forging documents to illegally transfer property belonging to Raj Kumari Devi. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner colluded with staff of the Anchal Office to create a forged deed and effect …
The petitioner, Khayali Yadav, was named in an FIR (Noorsarai PS Case No.375 of 2020) for murder, kidnapping and conspiracy under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B read with 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that co‑accused called the informant's husband, who later went missing and was found dead, but the …
The petitioner, Kumar Yashwant Singh, was named in an FIR under several IPC sections for allegedly being involved in a forged sale deed concerning land in Bhagalpur. He contended that he was merely a witness and not a beneficiary of any fraudulent transaction, asserting that the matter was …
The petitioners, seven individuals named Paswan, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Alamnagar, Case No. 201 of 2025) that alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The FIR specifically implicated co‑accused Pintu Mukhiya for firing at an …
The petitioners, Wajir Ahmad and Mobina Khatoon, parents of the accused Aftab Ali, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 64(1), 316(2), 318(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleges that Aftab Ali deceived a woman with a false promise of marriage, …
Kamela Khatoon, a woman from Kishanganj, sought bail after the police registered a case against her under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Explosive Substances Act, alleging she had exploded a bomb to frame others. She contended that the earlier case was false, no explosive …
