Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, given the agnate relationship, pending land dispute, counter FIR, and simple nature of injuries, the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail.

Summary

Ajit Kumar and Munna Kumar, agnates involved in a long-standing land dispute, were named in FIR No. 487/2025 for alleged assault and other offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. They filed an anticipatory bail application, contending that a prior FIR filed by them (No. 486/2025) preceded the present case and that the injuries caused were simple, while the informant's side suffered grievous injuries. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the specific allegation that petitioner No.1 assaulted the informant's son causing a head injury. The court noted the mutual agnate relationship, the pending title suit, the existence of a counter‑case, and the nature of injuries, and found no justification to deny bail. Accordingly, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, directing release on bail upon surrender.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the circumstances of a counter FIR and land dispute
  • Whether the nature of injuries and prior FIR affect the grant of anticipatory bail
  • Applicability of Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in granting anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • land dispute
  • FIR
  • counter case
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • East Champaran

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9411 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-487 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ajit Kumar son of Ramchandra Prasad Resident Of Village- Tikulia Ps-
                  Pipra District -East Champaran
           2.    Munna Kumar Son of Ramchandra Prasad Resident Of Village- Tikulia Ps-
                 Pipra District -East Champaran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-03-2026         1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned

                            Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                       2.   This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out

                            of Pipra Police Station Case No. 487 of 2025, dated

                            05.11.2025,        disclosing        offences       under       Sections

                            126(2)/115(2)/118/109(1)/303(2)/329(3)/352/351(2)/3(5)

                            of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                       3.   The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report,

                            is that on 04.11.2025, in the morning while the informant

                            was working in his field along with his family members,

                            the persons named in the First Information Report,

                            including the petitioners, armed with weapons arrived
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9411 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                            2/4




                  there and started abusing, when protested, the accused

                  persons started assaulting them. It has further been

                  alleged that the petitioner no. 1 and co-accused Anil

                  Kumar assaulted the informant’s son Anish Kumar with

                  farsa and tanguli/tangi and there is no specific allegation

                  against the petitioner no. 2.

              4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the

                  parties are agnates having long standing land dispute and

                  title suit, bearing T. S. No. 751 of 2022, is pending

                  between the parties in the Court of East Champaran,

                  Motihari. He next submits that the petitioners’ side was

                  assaulted by the side of the informant for which the

                  petitioners’ side lodged First Information Report, bearing

                  Pipra Police Station Case No. 486 of 2025, which is prior

                  in time to the present First Information Report. After

                  lodging of the First Information Report by the petitioners’

                  side, the present First Information Report, bearing Pipra

                  Police Station Case No. 487 of 2025, has been lodged by

                  the side of the informant as a counter case. He further

                  submits that injuries sustained by the victims are simple

                  in nature as would be evident from the injury report

                  annexed at Annexure-P/4 series (page-38 to 42), whereas,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9411 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                            3/4




                  the petitioners’ side have sustained grievous injuries

                  which is also annexed at Annexure-P/4 series (page-44

                  and 45) to the present application. Learned counsel also

                  submits that accused persons in the First Information

                  Report lodged by the side of the petitioners have got

                  anticipatory bail from sub-ordinate court itself.

              5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant

                  vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and

                  submits that the petitioners are specifically named in the

                  First Information Report and the petitioner no. 1 has

                  assaulted the son of the informant by means of farsa and

                  tanguli due to which he sustained head injury.

              6. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the

                  parties and taking into consideration the fact that both the

                  parties are agnates having long standing land dispute, title

                  suit is pending between them, case and counter is also

                  there and injuries sustained by the victims are simple in

                  nature, I am inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of

                  anticipatory bail.

              7. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

              8. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their

                  arrest or surrender before the Court below within four
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9411 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                                        4/4




                              weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

                              10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the

                              like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-

                              Divisional Judicial Magistrate-1, East Champaran at

                              Motihari, in connection with Pipra Police Station Case

                              No. 487 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under

                              Section 482 (2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita,

                              2023.



                                               (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
ashwani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.