Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhay Kumar @ Abhay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner as the prosecution failed to produce any material evidence linking him to the alleged offence.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, was not named in the FIR relating to a murder case under Section 304(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The informant’s mobile, allegedly stolen, was said to have been sold to the petitioner by a co‑accused, but no documentary evidence or recovery of the phone from the petitioner was produced. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing involvement in the sale of the stolen phone. The court noted the lack of material evidence linking the petitioner to the offence, observing that the mobile was recovered from other co‑accused and the petitioner’s only connection was an uncorroborated statement. Consequently, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted to the petitioner in the absence of substantive evidence linking him to the offence under Section 304(2) B.N.S.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement in the sale of the stolen mobile constitutes sufficient ground to deny bail under Section 438 CrPC and Section 482 BNSS

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • evidentiary insufficiency
  • FIR
  • Section 304(2) B.N.S.
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNSS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36677 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2024 Thana- Marnga District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Abhay Kumar @ Abhay Yadav, S/o Ganga Prasad Yadav @ Ganga Yadav, R/o
                 Village- Kabaiya, PS- Maranga, District- Purnia
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Md. Aslam Ansari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is not named in the FIR

                    and apprehending his arrest in connection with Maranga P.S.

                    Case No.189 of 2024 registered under Sections 304(2) of

                    the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘B.N.S.’).

                                3. As per FIR, the mobile of informant was

                    snatched by unknown co-accused persons on 28.08.2024

                    while he was returning after receiving treatment from one

                    Dr. Rajesh Kumar.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel that mobile of

                    informant was seized from one Piyush Anand and that too

                    before one year, who disclosed the name of this petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36677 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
                                            2/3




          saying that the mobile of informant was sold to him by this

          petitioner against cash of Rs.2,500/-. It is submitted that

          except said incriminating statement without any cogent

          material or documentary evidence, the petitioner was

          implicated with present case. It is submitted that no

          recovery of mobile was made from the possession of this

          petitioner. The petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and

          taking note of fact as recovery of alleged mobile of

          informant was made from co-accused persons, where

          implication of this petitioner is only with disclosure that he

          sold the stolen mobile to apprehended co-accused, without

          having      any      documentary          evidence,   accordingly,   the

          petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with
                Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36677 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
                                                            3/3




                          Maranga P.S. Case No.189 of 2024, subject to the

                          conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

                          Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’)/under Section 482(2) of

                          the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short

                          ‘BNSS’).


                                                             (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.