Patna High Court
Arun sahniversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioners, subject to a bond and verification of criminal antecedents, under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Summary
Arun Sahni and Devan Sahni sought bail after being implicated in a case (Saraiya PS Case No. 214 of 2026) for alleged manufacturing of illicit country-made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The police seized 215 litres of liquor from an open location, and local residents identified the petitioners and a co‑accused, Varun Sahni, as involved. The petitioners argued they had no possession of the liquor and were innocent, noting that Varun Sahni had already been granted anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, after reviewing the material, observed that the seizure was not from the petitioners' possession and, considering the co‑accused’s bail, ordered that the petitioners be released on bail with a bond of Rs 10,000 each, subject to verification of their criminal antecedents under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The order also directed that bail bonds not be delayed for verification purposes.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriateness of granting bail to the petitioners accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act when the seized liquor was not recovered from their possession?
- Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, are sufficient to safeguard the trial process.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- bail
- anticipatory bail
- illicit liquor
- prohibition act
- Section 30
- Section 482
- Bihar
- Muzaffarpur
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34224 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2026 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
1. Arun sahni Son of Late Sagar Sahni @ Ram Sagar Sahani R/o - Basaitha,
Ps- Saraiya, Dist- Muzaffarpur
2. Devan Sahni @ Devnarayan Sahni @ Devnarayan Son of late Sagar Sahni
@ Ram Sagar Sahani R/o - Basaitha, Ps- Saraiya, Dist- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Priyesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 19-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection
with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 214 of 2026 registered for the
offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition
& Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution story which has been lodged
on the basis of the written report submitted by the informant to
the effect that on 24.03.2026 while the informant was on
patrolling duty along with police party at about 6:40 P.M. he
received an information from the S.H.O. of the concerned police
station with regard to manufacturing of illicit country made
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34224 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
2/4
liquor by the petitioners and one another. The informant along
with police party approached the place of occurrence and upon
seeing the police party, people from nearby locality assembled
there. Upon search, total 215 litres of illicit country made liquor
and two gas cylinders, were recovered from four sacks
containing liquor in Ghoghiyar Chawar. A seizure lists was
prepared in the presence of independent witnesses. The local
people disclosed the name of the petitioners and one another, as
the persons indulged in manufacturing and selling illicit liquor.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the petitioners are innocent and they have got no concern with
the seized liquor. Nothing has been recovered from the
possession of the petitioners and the recovery has been made
from an open place, which is accessible to one and all. The
name of the petitioners transpired in the this case, only on the
basis of the information given by the local people. He furthers
submits that the co-accused Varun Sahni @ Varun Kumar, @
Barun Kumar has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail
by a learned Coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated
13.05.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 31960 of 2026. He further
submits that the petitioners have got clean antecedent.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34224 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
3/4
for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having considered the rival submissions and after
going through the records, it appears that 215 litres of country
made liquor was found in an open place and the local people
named the petitioners and co-accused Varun Sahni as the person
who are involved in manufacturing and selling of country made
liquor. Since the petitioners were not present at the place of
occurrence, therefore, there is no question of recovery from
them. Co-accused Varun Sahni has been granted privilege of
anticipatory bail by a learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Considering the above, let the petitioners, named above, in the
event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten
Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise-II,
Muzaffarpur in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 214 of
2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of
the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with further
condition:
(i) The learned Court concerned shall verify the
criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it
is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34224 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
4/4
antecedents, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation
of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail
bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be
delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
vinita/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.