Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Parwesh Kumar @ Parwesh Kumar Rocky @ Prawesh Kumar RockyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Parwesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a rape allegation made by his cousin sister-in-law, alleging an incident in 2021 and a delayed FIR filed in 2026. The petitioner contended that the allegation was false, arising from a family dispute, and highlighted the five‑year delay, the victim's adult status, and a purported compromise between the parties. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences under Sections 64 and 123 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court examined the delay, the familial relationship, and the alleged compromise, and concluded that these factors warranted the grant of bail. Accordingly, the petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a rape case under Sections 64 and 123 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita despite a five‑year delay in filing the FIR.
  • Whether the alleged compromise between the petitioner and the informant affects the grant of bail.
  • Whether the victim's adult status and claim of false allegation influence the bail decision.
  • Applicability of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS in granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • rape
  • false allegation
  • delay in FIR
  • compromise
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • sections 64, 123, 438, 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40175 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2026 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Parwesh Kumar @ Parwesh Kumar Rocky @ Prawesh Kumar Rocky, S/o
                 Shivanand Modi, R/o Village - Ward No.08, Modi Tola, P.S. - Kasba, District
                 - Purnea
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner
                                                  Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Ritu Kumari, D/o Munna Prasad Sah, R/o Village - Madarghat Ward No. 19,
                 P.S. - Kasba, District - Purnea

                                                         ... ... Opposite Parties
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP
                 For the Informant        :        Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State duly

                   assisted by learned counsel for the informant.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case

                   No.04 of 2026 registered under Sections 64 and 123 of the

                   Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘B.N.S.’).

                                3. Allegation against petitioner is to commit rape

                   upon informant in the year 2021, while she visited the house

                   of the petitioner, who is cousin brother-in-law (Jija) and also

                   to capture the obscene photographs. It is alleged that rape
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40175 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
                                            2/4




          was committed after making her unconscious. It is also

          alleged that the petitioner regularly thereafter threatening

          her to make the video viral, who alleged to made viral in the

          year 2026, whereafter the present FIR was lodged.

                       4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

          petitioner that admittedly the petitioner is a relative of the

          informant and due to certain family disputes, he was

          implicated falsely after taking advantage of home visit of

          petitioner by informant/victim in August 2021. It is pointed

          out that for long five years, no allegation was raised and in

          the year 2026, due to certain family disputes, the present

          false allegation was raised. It is also pointed out that even

          from the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 of

          the    BNSS,       it   cannot      be     gathered   safely   that   the

          rape/penetrative sexual assault was committed upon her. It

          is submitted that the victim was major even in the year

          2021, as by the time of lodging FIR, she was of 23 years

          and, therefore, it can be said that this is a case, maximum of

          extra marital affairs. It is submitted that when petitioner

          persuaded the informant to meet him after fixing of marriage
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40175 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
                                            3/4




          of informant with someone else, the present false case was

          lodged under apprehension that she might be defame.

                       5. Arguing further, it is submitted that the dispute

          and differences, which creates misunderstanding between

          the parties now appears compromised. The petitioner

          claimed clean antecedent.

                       6.      Learned APP duly assisted by Mr. Rakesh

          Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the informant while opposing

          the prayer of bail also submitted that the dispute and

          differences, which creates misunderstanding between the

          parties now appears compromised.

                       7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as FIR in issue was lodged after five

          years of the alleged occurrence, where admittedly the parties

          are relatives, coupled with the fact that the disputes and

          differences now appears compromised between the parties in

          view of the submission made by learned counsel for the

          parties, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40175 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026
                                                       4/4




                     on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                     Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea

                     in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.04 of 2026, subject

                     to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                     Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’)/under Section

                     482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in

                     short ‘BNSS’).


                                                          (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.