Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
16935 judgments · newest first · showing 1001–1200
Constable Mohar Singh and another applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 B.N.S.S. in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The State opposed, noting that proceedings under Section 82 CrPC/84 B.N.S.S. had already declared the applicants proclaimed offenders. The Court …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prince, who was charged with offences including rape under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing out …
The applicant, Subhash Chandra Sharma, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 01 of 2026) under Section 105 of the B.N.S. and Section 3/27/25 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the accidental discharge of a firearm during celebratory firing. He relied on …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 13 January 2026 that rejected a request to conclude the trial of a criminal case together with a cross‑case arising from the same incident. The applicant argued that the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 filed by Vikash Kumar Singh, who was implicated in a rape case (IPC ss.69, 352, 351(3), 316(2)). The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a long‑term consensual relationship that soured, and asserted innocence. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a Special Judge's order that rejected a Section 311 CrPC application for further cross‑examination of the child victim (PW‑1). The trial court had relied on Section 33(5) of the POCSO …
The applicant, Faizan Khan, filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a Sessions trial for offences under Sections 387, 307 and 506 IPC, alleging false and fabricated allegations and lack of evidence. The trial court had earlier rejected his Section 227 …
The applicants Shivam @ Sugam and Ram Kishor filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order dated 30 June 2023 in Complaint Case No. 7512 of 2023 filed by Santosh Verma (opposite party 2) alleging offences under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 and 379 IPC. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 10‑03‑2026 (Crime No. 0056 of 2026) under Sections 87 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest or harass them. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, …
The applicant, Shivpyari Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Auraiya, to expedite the trial of S.C. No.1371 of 2023 (State of U.P. v. Ramraj & others), a murder case under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devesh (alias Arvesh), who is charged under IPC sections 498‑A, 302, 201 and 34 for the murder of his wife. The body was discovered in his house after being allegedly moved there by a person named Dahla, who could not be traced during …
The applicant, Ramkrishna, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 3135 of 2014) and the non‑bailable warrant issued against him, alleging that he had been mistakenly identified as Ram Kishan Sharma. He contended that he was not …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings in complaint case No. 3185 of 2018, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial court verified that the …
Shiv Narayan filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 04‑09‑2022 and the criminal proceedings (Case No.1486 of 2023) relating to IPC offences 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed that a compromise between the parties had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑06‑2023 and a summoning order dated 17‑08‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑3, Ghaziabad, in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406 and …
The applicant, Sushil Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No.3600323 of 2006) pending before the Small Cause Judge/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, arising from offences under Sections …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the proceedings (S.C.No.21 of 2025) initiated under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, which were based on a predicate offence (Case Crime No.220 of 2023 under IPC sections 420 and 506) …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.85 of 2008) arising from offences under Sections 326, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise dated 16‑07‑2025, which was verified by the magistrate …
The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Bihar National Security Act filed by Vashu Dev Manjhi seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑04‑2025, the cognizance order dated 04‑07‑2025 and the entire proceedings of case no. 97720 of 2025. The applicant alleged false …
Vikram Prasad was arrested in a fraud case (Criminal No. 315 of 2024) alleging duping of an informant of Rs 4.42 crore through D.D. Finance, owned by his cousin Upendra Nath. He is charged under IPC sections 419, 420, 406, 504, 506 and 120‑B and has been in custody since 13‑Oct‑2024 while the trial …
Vishwadeepak Bharti alias Govind applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 315 of 2024) involving alleged cheating, fraud, criminal breach of trust and intimidation under Sections 419, 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that he and co‑accused duped the informant of about Rs 4.42 …
The petitioner Avdesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 17 June 2026 under Sections 117(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the dispute was trivial and the parties had amicably resolved it through a compromise affidavit. The court examined the compromise …
The appellant, Aneesh Ojha, was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 506, 120‑B and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly cheating a complainant by taking possession of his vehicle, misusing cheques and threatening him with caste‑related abuse. The appellant contended that the FIR …
Sugriv Yadav, accused of offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, applied for interim bail while the trial was pending. He had been in custody since 4 July 2025 and offered to return Rs.7.5 lakh to the informant as a condition of his release. Both the …
The accused Noor Mohammad applied for bail in a fraud case (Criminal No. 845 of 2024) alleging that he received Rs.12 lakh from the informant for a contract to erect an Airtel tower, of which part was repaid and a cheque later dishonoured. He has 14 criminal cases pending, is on bail in nine, and is …
The appellants Shilpa and Shubham were named in an FIR alleging that they, along with another accused, assaulted the informant Bechan and his daughter Roshni with lathi and danda, used caste‑indicative slurs, and caused multiple injuries during a dispute over plucking peas. The State, invoking …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mujayyan, who was in custody since 1 June 2026 in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 351(2), 338 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
The appellant Aman Singh appealed against the order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Etawah, which had closed his opportunity to cross‑examine PW‑1 in a case involving offences under Sections 366, 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of the SC/ST Act. The trial court observed that PW‑1’s …
The appellants challenged a summoning order issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case involving alleged offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The FIR listed six accused, but the charge sheet named only three adults, with the remaining …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 5548 of 2019, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The parties had entered into a compromise on 15 May 2026, which was …
The appeal challenges a summoning order issued by a Special Court under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions, alleging that the complaint of caste-based harassment and outraging modesty is false and unsupported by evidence. The complainant, whose husband is a convicted …
The accused Sushil Maurya applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 170 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 506 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he took money to secure a government job for the informant's son. He has three other criminal cases, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nirdosh Chaudhary in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 218, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the IPC and Sections 13, 13(i)a, 13(i)b, 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant argued that the transaction was …
The applicant, Ravendra, husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide, was arrested under Sections 85, 108 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. He contended that the FIR was lodged five days after the death, that the investigation showed no suicide note or material …
The accused, Irshad, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 145 of 2026) alleging he was falsely implicated in a delayed FIR for assaulting a woman with bricks, causing multiple injuries including one fatal. He claimed no motive, no prior criminal record, and that the FIR was lodged by his …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 09.01.2025 and the cognizance order dated 27.06.2025 in State v. Prahlad @ Pawan Dixit and others, relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 …
The accused, Sushil Maurya, was arrested in Crime No. 03 of 2025 under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 168, 471 and 406 for allegedly taking money to secure a government job for the informant's son, a job that was never provided and the money was not returned. He has three other criminal cases, one of …
Arun Kumar Agnihotri, accused in a 2020 fraud case (Crime No.12) under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471, sought bail claiming he was falsely implicated and that the money was received by co‑accused Yashwant Verma. He alleged that he had no role in the alleged fraud involving Rs 2,72,000 and 1,650 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aalim Ali, who was in custody since 8 July 2026 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, with an earlier FIR under Section 409 later dropped. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shahid Khan @ Munna, who was charged in Crime No. 116 of 2026 under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 87 BNS and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑8‑month‑old …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of a charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from a land dispute. They contended that the FIR and subsequent criminal proceedings were filed to harass them and that the underlying dispute was already pending as …
Mukesh Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in criminal case No. 598 of 2025, which arose from an FIR under Section 406 IPC. The High Court examined the charge‑sheet, the summons, and the applicant’s criminal history, noting …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 2924 of 2025 (State vs. Dharmendra Singh and others). The High Court examined the charge‑sheet, cognizance order, and the applicants’ criminal history, noting that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10814 of 2022) relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second …
Arvindpal Singh, a branch manager, was arrested in connection with a 2024 case (Crime No. 217) involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. He filed a bail application, claiming he was falsely implicated, that the loan in question was sanctioned based on a report …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and Non‑Bailable Section (BNSS) seeking to quash a Non‑Bailable Warrant (NBW) dated 14‑07‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (E.C. Act) in Session Trial No. 541 of 2024, relating to offences under Sections 323, 504, 452, 506, 308, 336 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 227 of 2025 arising from Crime No. 207 of 2024, which involved …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑12‑2024, the cognizance/summoning order dated 14‑07‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 10944 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and …
Govind Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑02‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑04‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 6536 of 2026, which alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 121(1). The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradeep Kumar, who was charged under CrPC Section 65(1), IPC Sections 351(3) and 352, and POCSO Sections 3 and 4(2) for allegedly attempting indecent assault on a minor. The applicant argued that the victim’s statements recorded under Sections …
The accused, Sajan Singh, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 240 of 2026, which arose from an FIR lodged on 1 June 2026 for theft of cash and jewellery. He was later identified through a police disclosure statement after being arrested in an unrelated case. The applicant has a history of …
The accused, Sajjan Singh, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 161 of 2026) involving alleged theft and offences under Sections 331(4), 305(A), 317(2) and 317(4) of the IPC. The FIR was initially lodged against anonymous persons, and the accused was later identified through a …
Surendra Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar National Security Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 09‑11‑2011, the cognizance order dated 07‑12‑2011, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.341 of 2011) on the ground that he was falsely implicated and that …
The applicant, Farhat Khan, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No.51254 of 2023) that arose from a monetary dispute with the second opposite party. The applicant alleged that the FIR and subsequent charge‑sheet under IPC sections 406, 504 and 506 …
The applicant, Sanjeet Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, Judicial Officer Shamim Ahmad Ansari, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 20‑08‑2025 directing the Special POCSO Judge to expedite trial of Sessions Trial No. 689/2019 (State v. Sanjeet Yadav) under …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Dinesh under CrPC Section 482 in a case alleging his involvement in the suicide of a deceased person, charged under Sections 191(2), 333, 127(2) of the CrPC and Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The applicant claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raju, who is accused under Sections 103(1) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for murder. Raju contended that the FIR narrative is false, the informant’s testimony is doubtful, and that his co‑accused Naresh had already been released on bail, …
The applicant Rahul was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 223 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. He is not named in the FIR but his name appears in the confessional statement of a co‑accused, and he has been in custody since 24‑06‑2026. …
The applicants, Hemant Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1424 of 2025, which involved offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506. The applicants asserted that they had reached an …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash charge sheet No. 46 of 2022 and the related criminal proceedings arising under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had amicably settled their dispute outside court, and …
The applicants, Satyam Tiwari and Arun Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 479 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 504, 506, 307, 34 and 148 of the IPC. They contended that they were …
The applicant, Shashi Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17-06-2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09-02-2021, the non-bailable warrant dated 04-04-2024, and the process under Section 82 CrPC dated 10-06-2026, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 01.05.2026 in Criminal Case No. 2235 of 2026 (State vs. Garima et al.). They contended that the charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal …
The applicant, Atul Kumar Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a magistrate’s order dated 13 March 2026 that treated a charge‑sheet under IPC Sections 352 and 351(3) as a State case. Pandey argued that these sections relate to non‑cognizable offences and, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside the order dated 16‑08‑2024 in criminal case 12491/2024 (State vs. Qyamuddin) where charges under IPC Sections 420, 406 and 506 had been framed. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision …
The petitioners Bhagirath and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑05‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑07‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 2137 of 2026 arising from FIR …
Mohammad Qasim was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 205 of 2026) alleging violations of Sections 318(4), 105 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 34 of the Indian Medical Council Act. He contended that he is not a doctor and was falsely implicated, noting that the deceased infant’s …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 55616 of 2025, where the accused were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, according to the …
Santosh Kumari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2891 of 2025) filed under Section 468 IPC and to obtain an order for the speedy disposal of her bail application. The State did not oppose the request for an expeditious bail hearing. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 3152 of 2021) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants claimed that they had …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rampravesh Pal in Criminal Case No. 423 of 2024, where he was charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly forging cheques and withdrawing Rs. 67 lakh from his brother's …
Anand Yadav, the accused in State v. Anand Yadav (Case No. 156 of 2023), filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO) at Orai to expedite the trial, which involves charges under Section 377 IPC, …
The applicant, Shiv Shankar Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 07.01.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11.02.2025, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2958 of 2025 relating to FIRs under …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yaseen in a criminal case (Cr.No. 581 of 2025) involving alleged assault and subsequent death of an informant's sister‑in‑law. Yaseen argued that he was never named in the FIR and that the informant’s later statement implicating him was …
Dr. Badri Prasad Agrawal, a 79‑year‑old senior citizen, appealed against a bail rejection order of a Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The FIR alleged that he raped a domestic worker on 4‑Nov‑2024 and threatened to release a video, but the FIR was lodged only on …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ikbal under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was a retaliatory …
The applicant, Sahbaz @ Mohd Shahbaj, was implicated in a 2018 case under Sections 147, 148, 323, 452, 308 and 504 IPC and sought anticipatory bail after a non‑bailable warrant was issued without service of summons. He argued that the injuries alleged were not grievous, that the chargesheet had …
Monu Kumar Gupta, an accused in Criminal Case No. 9633 of 2024 (State vs Hardeep Singh & others) filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli, decide the case within a stipulated period. The State opposed …
The applicant, Ramesh Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi, to decide his criminal case (Criminal Case No. 794 of 2018) within a stipulated period, alleging that no prosecution witness had been examined since the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Murad Ali under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 409 and 120B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a two‑year delay in filing the FIR, and asserted that the money …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Mishra in a cyber‑crime case (Criminal No. 0031 of 2026) under IPC sections 317(2), 317(5), 318(4) and 111(2). The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated based on an informer’s tip, and that there was no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had reached a settlement with the second opposite party. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hari Narayan Alias Munna, accused under Section 304 IPC for the murder of his wife. The applicant argued that the prosecution’s case relied solely on hearsay, with the only witnesses being the deceased’s son and daughter, who were not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and Non‑bailable Surrender (BNSS) Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑08‑2026 issued in a criminal complaint (Case No. 1649 of 2024) under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. They also requested that the lower courts be …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun Richhariya, who was arrested in a murder case (Crime No. 70 of 2026) under Sections 103(1) and 191(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the statement of a co‑accused and a confessional statement by the …
The applicant, Sameer Srivastava, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (crime no. 16/2023) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25.05.2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06.07.2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 9523 of 2026 arising from FIR under various IPC sections. The High Court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mantu Vishwakarma, who was named in an FIR alleging assault leading to death and injuries under various IPC sections and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the allegations against him were false, that no medical evidence existed for the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gyan Chandra @ Pradumman in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, with the FIR containing vague allegations against him and no corroborative evidence linking him …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. for Rakesh Babu, who was charged under IPC sections 351(3), 352, 137(2), 87 and Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim’s age was …
The applicants Shamsuddin and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 65 of 2022 (Najrana v. Samsuddin et al.) which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Devi Dayan Gupta under Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic and Dangerous Substances Act in a case of alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a 72‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of direct evidence, …
The applicant, Vinay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Crime No.604 of 2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. He claimed innocence and argued that the police were attempting an unwarranted arrest, citing a prior interim bail order and the Supreme …
The applicant, Sharafat Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of a non‑bailable warrant dated 03‑04‑2023 and a Section 82 CrPC process dated 13‑07‑2026 in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar. …
The applicant, Abhishek Soni, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 1048 of 2024) that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120‑B IPC. The ground relied upon was the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lakhan, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 57 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences. Lakhan claimed he was falsely implicated and that the dispute was essentially civil, citing a sale deed executed by the landowner. He had been in …
Ashish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 in a case (Crime No.114 of 2025) where he is alleged, along with five others, to have assaulted three persons, causing various injuries. The applicant claims he is innocent, that the allegations against him are vague, and that he has no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikrant Prakash Singh, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 384 of 2025) based on confessional statements of co‑accused, though his name was absent from the FIR. The applicant argued innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonakshi, who was arrested in a case under Sections 318(4), 61(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a forged marriage. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, alleging false implication due to an ulterior motive, and highlighted …
The applicants, Kunj Gupta and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a case filed under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise. The …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Chauhan under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 225 of 2026). The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that the alleged victim was a consenting party, while the State opposed the bail but …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rakesh in a murder case (Criminal No. 88 of 2026) where the prosecution alleged involvement based on circumstantial evidence, a recovered mobile phone, and statements of co‑accused. The applicant argued that no one was named in the FIR, there was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Yadav, who was charged under Sections 109(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code in connection with a shooting incident in Deoria. The prosecution alleged that Yadav had called the victim, Prakash Yadav, to a park where co‑accused …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naresh Kumar, who was implicated in a case under Sections 316(5), 317(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the Banking Regulation Act for alleged misappropriation of gold from a bank safe. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hariom Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 324(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name was not in the FIR and was only mentioned in a co‑accused's …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amit Kumar, who was implicated under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged 24 days after the incident, that there was no direct or indirect evidence linking him to …
The applicants, Shiv Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑12‑2022 and the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1238 of 2023, which involved offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. …
The applicant Rajaram filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22 September 2024 and the cognizance order dated 26 November 2024 in Criminal Case No. 24878 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 182, 200, 506 IPC and …
Gabbar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a judgment dated 10 September 2026 of the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in Budaun, which arose from a criminal case under Sections 452 and 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmveer, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 77 of 2026) alleging assault that led to the death of an informant's father. The FIR charges him under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 105 of the Indian Penal Code and a provision of the …
The accused Shekhar applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 370 of 2026) involving offences under several IPC sections, including assault and grievous hurt. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the investigation only implicated him through a vague statement, with no specific role …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tushar Kumar, accused in a case involving alleged assault over a property dispute, where the FIR listed several violent offences under the IPC. The applicant argued that the injuries to the victims were simple, he had no prior criminal record, …
Raj Shekhar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 238 of 2026, alleging false implication and lack of independent witnesses to the recovery of two mobile phones and Rs.500. The applicant argued that no corroborative evidence linked him to the offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Rajkumar Dubey, who feared arrest in a 2018 case involving offences under Sections 147, 406, 420 and 120‑B IPC. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences did not attract a …
The petitioner, Digamber Singh, was charged under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and faced both criminal prosecution and disciplinary proceedings. He filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent proceedings, alleging prejudice. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Bharar Lal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Umesh in Criminal Case No. 171 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The case is based on circumstantial evidence, and the applicant was named as an accused during investigation along with …
Petitioner Ajay Kumar Singh filed a petition under Article 227 challenging an order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Special Judge) under the Essential Commodities Act and an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the CrPC that refused registration of an FIR …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Monu @ Rohit, who was implicated in a suicide case under Sections 108, 115(2), 333 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a delayed FIR, lack of evidence of abetment, and asserted that the arrest would …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No.2591/2023) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Ompal Singh, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 409, 406, 120-B, 467 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that he had cooperated with the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kuldeep in a rape case (Crime No. 323 of 2026) where the complainant alleged sexual assault based on a false promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, the relationship was consensual for 3-4 years, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑05‑2024 in a case where they were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhudev under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. …
The applicants, Abhishek Pandey and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 01‑08‑2026 in State v. Satya Prakash Pandey, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) (i.e., IPC Sections 420 and 406) along …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shubham Singh, who was charged under Sections 105, 115(2), 303(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code in a case arising from an incident at Bidhnu police station. The applicant argued that he was not named in the original FIR and that his …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aniket in a case under Sections 191(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1) and 342(4) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and pledged cooperation with the investigation, while the State opposed the bail but did …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and related proceedings in a case where they were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicants argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 21‑06‑2022 that had summoned them under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the underlying personal …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 5548 of 2026) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Bhikam Singh Kardam and others for offences under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333 and 125(a) of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 10472 of 2026, which arose from a complaint under sections 498A, 323 IPC and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants claimed that they had reached a full and amicable compromise with the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 222 of 2019 and the cognizance order, as well as to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued against them. They contended that they were on …
The applicants, Rajat Tyagi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 71445/2023) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. They contended that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision …
The accused Shadab was arrested for alleged assault with a knife under several IPC sections, including 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2) and 118(1). He claimed that the informant and he belong to the same family and that a compromise had been reached, with the informant expressing no desire to …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ranjit Singh Baghel under Section 482 CrPC in a case registered under Section 409 IPC for alleged criminal breach of trust. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a three‑year delay in filing the FIR and his absence from work on …
Savitri applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 101 of 2026) under Sections 87, 137(2), 142 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that she was implicated only because photographs from her mobile phone linked her brother Shivanshu to an alleged enticement of a minor. She claimed no …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Farman in criminal case No. 179 of 2026, alleged under IPC Section 105 and CrPC Section 223(2). The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, there was no prior enmity with the deceased, and the allegations were vague with …
The appellant Aryan Singh Yadav was charged under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and caste‑based abusing the informant at a public feast. He appealed under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking quash of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Javed, who is accused of offences under IPC Sections 364, 302 and 201 arising from a 2017 incident. Javed has been in judicial custody since 28 January 2018 and the trial …
The accused, Anil Kumar Singh Yadav, sought bail in a criminal case involving sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to fraud and forgery, alleging that the FIR lodged by Shashank Bajpai was false and stemmed from a commercial dispute over a sub‑tender. The applicant contended that no sub‑tender …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 1062 of 2021) that alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 354, 323, 504, 506 and D.P. Act sections 3 and 4. Both the applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the …
The applicants Sunil Kumar (deceased), Aman @ Bholu and Rakesh Singh filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash Special Case No.35 of 2023 (Tridev Singh v. Sunil Kumar et al.) pending before the Special Judge, Etawah, alleging that the criminal case was false, stemmed from a land dispute, …
The applicants, comprising a husband (Rohit) and his relatives, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the charge sheet and stay proceedings in a dowry harassment case filed under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act. They …
The applicant, Jakir, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 400 of 2007) under Section 137 of the Electricity Act and Sections 379 and 411 of the IPC. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC but later sought to withdraw it and instead file a regular bail …
The applicant, Suman Awasthi, sought a No‑Objection Certificate (NOC) and renewal of her passport to travel abroad, but the trial court rejected her application on the basis that a criminal case against her was stayed by this High Court. The criminal case involved offences under Sections 323, 498A, …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash Sessions Trial No.286 of 2017 (State vs. Virendra Rai) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 308, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Additional Sessions Judge on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 11728 of 2025) arising from a Section 306 IPC charge of attempted suicide. Both parties admitted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the trial court on 03.09.2026. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 19658 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Judicial Magistrate on 22‑09‑2026, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a conviction dated 30‑08‑2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhibramau, in a case under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicants had appealed the conviction before the Sessions Court, …
The applicant, Tej Narayan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Judicial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 18‑09‑2013 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was …
The petitioner, Yogendra Prasad, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair investigation and arrest the accused under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 315 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, after a magistrate had ordered further investigation. The police had …
The applicant Ajay filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No.04 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC arising from a crime in Shahzadnagar, Rampur. The parties had already reached an amicable settlement, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradeep Kumar Joshi, who was implicated in a double murder case (Crime No.309 of 2019) under Sections 302 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only linked to the crime through the statements of co‑accused and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings (Case No. 547 of 2021) relating to offences under Sections 147, 323, 427, 504 and 506 IPC. A compromise verification report confirmed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute, …
The Allahabad High Court disposed of two connected bail applications filed by Kamal Sharma and Lalley Dhuriya, who were named in FIR No. 47 of 2026 for murder. The prosecution’s case relied solely on CCTV footage showing co‑accused Vimal Panda and Akash firing at the deceased, with no eye‑witnesses …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and the entire Session Trial proceedings arising from a case involving offences under Sections 363, 366 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification report …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge-sheet and related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 131, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 08‑01‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 320 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1777 of 2023) arising from Crime No. 424 of 2022, which involved offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325 and 506. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants Ratiram and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (ST No.211 of 2014) arising from Crime No.67 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 316, 323 and 504 of the IPC. The parties had entered …
The applicants Kallu and others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 700 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 394 and 325 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the …
The applicant, Sumit Kumar, was charged in a 2015 FIR for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC, alleging indiscriminate firing that caused a death. He was arrested at the scene along with co‑accused but escaped custody in 2018 and was re‑arrested only in September 2025, having spent a …
Manoj Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.150 of 2026 (State vs. Manoj Kumar) that arose from a charge of criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise on 20 July 2026, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. They asserted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the Additional Chief …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No.1146 of 2024) arising from Case Crime No.62 of 2021, which involved multiple non‑compoundable IPC offences. Both parties had reached an amicable settlement, a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.175 of 2007 (State & Manik Singh vs. Sovran and Others) concerning an offence under Section 364 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was verified by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, alleging that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 17 September 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicants, Sumit Shukla and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to set aside a charge sheet filed under IPC Section 447 for criminal trespass. They argued that, pursuant to the Uttar Pradesh Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1961, a written notice under the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 22.08.2023 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC, alleging that a compromise had been reached and verified by the magistrate on 24.08.2026. The court noted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑06‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 18‑01‑2022 in a criminal case (Case No. 367 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 07‑10‑2024 in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. The court was shown a compromise deed …
The petitioner, a Circle Officer, was suspended on 15‑02‑2019 and penalised for allegedly leaking confidential information during a criminal investigation, based on call records showing personal calls with a woman. He challenged the disciplinary enquiry, the suspension order, and the subsequent …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and the Session Trial No. 514 of 2020 relating to an alleged attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …
The applicants, Anurag Sharma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2021 and the related warrant trial (No. 1670 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323 and 504 IPC arising from a dispute in Ghaziabad. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet, cognizance order and all proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 17518 of 2026) arising from offences under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). The applicants asserted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Session Trial No. 797 of 2015, which stemmed from a 2013 case involving multiple IPC offences, many of which are non‑compoundable. A compromise verification report confirmed that the parties had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 16171/9 of 2026) relating to offences under Sections 110, 115(2), 131, 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 112/2024) arising from offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 354‑A, 323, 504, 506, 427 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had reached a …
Hemant was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he and nine others opened indiscriminate fire on 5 February 2026, resulting in the death of a man whose maternal grandfather, Shyamveer Singh, is the sole eyewitness. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, filed nine hours after the …
Petitioners Syed Asad Ali and others filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 21 July 2026 and a mandamus to restrain the State from arresting them. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The State’s Additional …
The applicants Brijpal Singh and another filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑03‑2019 in Criminal Case No.18042 of 2019, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. They contended that, based on …
Alok Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 112 of 2018, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 323/149, 325/149, 308/149, 504 and 506 of the IPC. He claimed he was falsely implicated, was exonerated during …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aakash Pradhan under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging firing, where the applicant feared arrest. The applicant's counsel argued that the video evidence only implicated co‑accused Shekhar and Keshav, and that …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC. The learned Additional Government Advocate highlighted the applicant's prior criminal case (Case Crime No. 398 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 324, 504 and 506 IPC, which was not disclosed in the affidavit as …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil in Crime No.311 of 2026, alleged under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Sahil had enticed a minor girl, but the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated she was older, had left …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravindra Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 140(1) and 3/5 of the B.N.S. for alleged abduction of a husband. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the alleged victim was a relative and that the abduction was a money dispute, and …
Vikas Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 04‑05‑2022 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑06‑2022 in Criminal Case No. 230 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nazim (applicant) in Criminal Case No. 148 of 2026 under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the prosecution's key witnesses – the mother of the deceased (PW‑1) and the injured party (PW‑2) – …
The applicant, Satydev Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case (Crime No. 158 of 2015) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. The State opposed, noting that the applicant had earlier filed a Section 482 application (No. 39713 …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Nirmala Devi, a former Block Pramukh, who feared arrest in a case (Crime No. 08 of 2019) involving offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 120B and 34 IPC. The FIR, relating to a 2005 incident, was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Inderraj, the sole accused in a murder case (Criminal No. 937 of 2018) under Section 302 IPC. The applicant, who is deaf and dumb, had been in custody since October 2018, amounting to nearly eight years, with only six of fifteen witnesses …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Bhartiya, who was arrested in Crime No. 412 of 2026 under Sections 109(1) and 115(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed out that a similarly situated co‑accused, Neeraj Bhartiya, had already been granted …
Arshad Miyan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 244 of 2026 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2) and 352 of BNS‑2023 (corresponding to IPC sections 341, 323 and 504) and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The petitioner also made an …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Irfan under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 226 of 2026) where the complainant alleged sexual assault after a broken promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, the FIR was false and …
Arun Kumar Gupta and Anil Kumar Gupta were charged under Sections 419, 420, 504 and 506 IPC in Crime No. 181 of 2019. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC, claiming innocence and lack of credible evidence. The High Court initially granted them interim …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepa and Preeti in Crime No. 477 of 2026, which involved alleged offences under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 127(2), 109(1) and 351(3) B.N.S. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated in a matrimonial dispute, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 23.01.2023 and the cognizance order dated 05.07.2023 that had summoned them under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The opposite party contended that, according to the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shubham, accused in a rape case arising from a long‑term consensual relationship allegedly based on a false promise of marriage. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, the victim’s statements were inconsistent, there was no …
