Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
16935 judgments · newest first · showing 801–1000
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Yadav, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 378 of 2025) involving alleged illegal sale and transportation of codeine‑based cough syrup under several IPC and NDPS provisions. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR …
The applicant, Hafiz Mohammad Nizamuddin, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Security Code seeking the dismissal of criminal proceedings (State Vs. Mohd. Siddiq & others) pending under IPC Section 120B and the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Conversion of Religion Act. He alleged that …
Anand Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 417, 504 and 506 of the IPC. He argued that the FIR was lodged after a four‑year delay and was a retaliatory measure against a prior case in Tripura. …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the B.N.S. filed by Vishnu Kumar and two others, who were accused in a suicide‑abetment case (Crime No. 592 of 2026). The applicants claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged after an unreasonable …
The accused Jano applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 295 of 2026) involving alleged assault with a sharp-edged weapon and a fatal injury to the victim Gulzar. The FIR, lodged on 25.07.2026, does not specify the exact date and time of the incident, and there is inconsistency regarding the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suraj, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 85 of 2026 under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The FIR alleged that Suraj had enticed the daughter of the first informant, but the victim’s statements under …
Gulam Mohd. applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in connection with offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 504 and 353. The Additional Government Advocate argued that the offences do not attract imprisonment exceeding seven years, a charge‑sheet has already been filed and there is no …
Munna alias Shivaashray Yadav was arrested in connection with case crime No. 708 of 2026 under IPC sections 3(5), 115(2), 333 and 140(1). He contended that he had transferred Rs 12,00,000 to the victim, Manoj Kumar Pandey, for securing a railway job for his daughter, that the victim later returned …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Guddu Biyar in a criminal case (Crime No.127 of 2026) involving IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 309(4), 317(2) and 109. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR contains general and omnibus allegations and that both …
The accused Junaid @ Kala applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 290 of 2026) involving alleged indiscriminate firing at a family function, resulting in minor injuries to three persons. The prosecution argued that the accused had previously been granted bail with conditions, possessed a pistol …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saklain in a criminal case (Crime No. 684 of 2025) under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that the FIR was lodged more than four months after the alleged incident and that no obscene …
The petitioners, who are in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty from alleged threats by private respondents. The petitioners claimed they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended that …
The applicant Satyam Singh was arrested for alleged assault on a fellow student, resulting in multiple injuries to both parties. The FIR was lodged by the victim's brother, while no FIR was filed against the applicant. The applicant sought bail, arguing the incident was a sudden quarrel, he has no …
Shamim applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 352 of 2026) originally charged under Section 103(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court had already dismissed his earlier bail application for that offence, and a charge‑sheet had subsequently been filed. In the meantime, Shamim was also …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s. 482 in a case alleging assault, dowry‑related violence and offences under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. The FIR was lodged 41 days after the alleged incident and the applicants 1 and 2 are the …
Anni Begum was arrested in connection with Crime No. 803 of 2025, alleged to have fraudulently obtained pension benefits of Rs. 24,000, which have already been recovered by the Government. She has been in custody since 3 July 2026 and has no prior criminal record, while her co‑accused have already …
Pavan Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case where he is charged under IPC sections 376, 342, 506 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He had previously been granted regular bail, appeared regularly in court, and the trial court had ordered his surrender after a revision application. The applicant …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Arun Singh, who was not named in the FIR or charge sheet in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 342, 506 of the IPC and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act. The applicant was summoned …
Abhishek Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 342, 506 IPC and Sections 16/17 of the POCSO Act. He was not named in the FIR nor charge‑sheeted; the FIR named his cousin Pawan Singh as the primary accused. The victim’s statement recorded in court …
Vijay Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 591 of 2026) alleging false implication in an FIR filed by the victim on 2 August 2026 for assault. The applicant argued that the FIR and medico‑legal report were unduly delayed, the injuries were minor, and a civil dispute existed between …
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 07.08.2026 that alleged offences under various sections of the IPC, the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act and the Scheduled Castes/Tribes Act. They made an innocuous prayer that the police, before making any arrests, should follow the Supreme Court …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jitendra Sharma under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 111(3), 318(4), 61(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(3) of the IPC. Sharma claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and pledged …
The applicant Nadeem filed a bail application in a case involving alleged looting of Rs.1.20 crore, a pistol, cartridges and cash, claiming he was not named in the FIR and that the recovered items were falsely linked to him. The prosecution could not produce any independent witness or corroborative …
Anurak Dhama filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14‑05‑2026 issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, and …
The applicant, Pradeep Kumar Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a 9 July 2026 order from a 2018 Session Trial that had framed charges against him under IPC sections 302 and 34 for a 2017 crime. The case was pending before a …
The accused, Ajay Pratap Singh, applied for bail in a case under Sections 109 of the IPC and Sections 3, 25(1‑B)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a police encounter on 13‑03‑2026 where a country‑made pistol was recovered. The applicant argued that the recovery was made without any independent …
The applicants Lalaram and Vijay filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1), 117(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties claimed injuries, with five persons on the informant’s side and four on the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the court that a criminal FIR (Case Crime No. 218 of 2026) had already been lodged under sections 87, 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rakesh Singh in a rape case (CrPC 482) where the FIR alleged sexual assault based on a broken promise of marriage. The applicant argued that the relationship was consensual, the FIR was false and frivolous, and there was no medical …
Elias Ahmed applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0140 of 2026) filed under Section 87 BNS after being arrested on 14 April 2026. He contended that the FIR, lodged by the victim’s uncle, was false and that the victim’s statement under Section 180 BNSS showed she voluntarily left her uncle’s …
The applicant, Karimuddin, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking the suspension of a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in the pending trial (State vs Karimuddin, NDPS case No 52A/2001). The applicant’s counsel argued that the warrant was issued because the accused …
Foola Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482, alleging that he might be arrested in a case (Cr.No.230 of 2020) involving IPC offences 147, 148, 149, 308, 323, 325, 504 and 506. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected that the offences do not attract imprisonment …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty from alleged threats by private respondents. The petitioners argued that they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended …
The applicants, Mohd Luqman and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 14‑01‑2026 issued by the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate/Fast Track Court‑II, Amroha, in a dowry‑related criminal …
The accused, Salman, applied for bail in a case under Sections 288 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act for allegedly possessing fire‑cracker material. He claimed false implication, lack of an independent witness to the arrest and recovery, and highlighted his cooperation …
The accused Kamlesh applied for bail in a criminal case involving sections of the IPC and CrPC, alleging false implication in an FIR filed by the victim alleging assault. He argued that the FIR and medico‑legal report were unduly delayed, the injuries were minor, and a civil dispute existed between …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Munni Devi @ Meera and Chandrashekhar Vishwakarma in a case under Section 108 BNS alleging abetment of suicide. The applicants contended they were falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged after a 20‑day delay, and there was …
Lal Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0290 of 2023) where he is charged under Sections 401 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the allegations against him are false, that he was not present at the scene, and that his name appears only in a co‑accused’s confessional …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Geeta in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 110 and 117(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed the FIR was false and stemmed from a petty dispute, emphasizing her clean criminal record and willingness to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Dilshad in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 35120 of 2026, seeking release in a case under Sections 310(2) and 61(2) of the IPC and CrPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, and that co‑accused …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Firoz @ Ajmeri, who is accused in Crime No. 7 of 2026 under Sections 305(A), 317(2) and 331(4) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 21 January …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Rahish Pal, a revenue officer (Lekhpal), who feared arrest in a case (Crime No.237 of 2025) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed false implication, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gautam, who was implicated in a theft of electric wire case (Criminal No. 135 of 2026) under sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, stating his name appeared only in a co‑accused's confession and …
Petitioners Bhagwan Sharan Shau and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23.08.2026 under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the IPC and a mandamus restraining their arrest. The petitioners later made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Pramila, who feared arrest in a case (Crime No. 197 of 2026) involving alleged assault under IPC sections 351(3), 352, 109 and 115(2). The applicant claimed she was falsely implicated, noting that the FIR did not mention injuries to …
The petitioners, Dev Kumar and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 110. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the offences did not attract imprisonment …
The accused Bhura applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 104 of 2026) alleging matrimonial atrocities, forced miscarriage, and assault. He claimed false implication, stating that the FIR was lodged by the victim's father and that there is no definitive medical evidence linking him to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 8166 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached an out‑of‑court …
The accused, Prabhushekhar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 133 of 2026) involving alleged firing of a licensed gun during a property dispute in Etah, Uttar Pradesh. The FIR alleged that he opened fire after a dispute over a plot of land, but the counsel argued that the matter was …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking discharge of the criminal case State vs. Pankaj Kumar Rawat pending before the District Court, alleging that no offence was made out and that the prosecution was malicious. The applicant argued lack of …
The applicant filed a criminal complaint alleging that his father, Satyaveer Singh, was murdered in a conspiracy involving Sohanveer, Arjun Singh and others, and that the police had failed to act despite a DSP report identifying the accused. The Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint …
The appellant, Janu@ Mujjasin Bashir Bhaba, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 147, 353 and 342 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of one year, one year and nine months respectively. The appellant filed …
The appellant, Gajanan S. Agavne, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 498-A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment on each count. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 245 of 2001 challenging the conviction …
The applicant, Dilip Dnyaneshwar Pawar, sought bail under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for offences of murder, criminal conspiracy and common intention (IPC §§302, 120‑B, 34). He had been in custody for 5 years and 4 months pending trial, with …
The appellant, Rizwan Shaikh, was convicted of murder for stabbing Bakarali during a quarrel that arose while Shaikh was illegally connecting electricity wires to a hut. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses (relatives of the deceased), medical evidence of two stab wounds, and a recovered …
The applicant, Pawan Khemani, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 471 and 474 of the IPC relating to alleged forgery of sale agreements and a memorandum of understanding. The FIR arose from …
The applicant, Akshay Uttam Bharti, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences including attempt to murder and violations under the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act and MCOCA. The FIR and CCTV footage indicated his involvement similar to another …
The applicants, the husband and his in‑laws, were charged under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 and 34 IPC for alleged domestic abuse and misappropriation of the victim's stridhan following their marriage on 4 May 2023. The victim, now the respondent, filed an FIR on 8 January 2024 and the case …
The applicant, Ganesh Bajirao Dhamale, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for offences under IPC sections 307, 147, 148, 149, the Arms Act and the Bombay Police Act. He had been in custody from 2019 to 2026, released on default bail in 2020, and later …
The appellant, Reena Shailesh Mishra, sought anticipatory bail after a dispute over a public water tap allegedly led to an assault and caste‑based abuse against a Scheduled Caste informant. The prosecution charged her under several IPC offences (324, 323, 504, 427, 34) and under the SC & ST Act …
The petitioners, the husband and father‑in‑law of the complainant, sought quashing of FIR No.8 of 2024 and the pending criminal case alleging offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323 and 34 IPC, on the ground that the matter had been amicably settled. The complainant, identified as the victim, filed …
The petitioners, the husband and father‑in‑law of the complainant, sought quashing of FIR No.8 of 2024 and the pending criminal case alleging offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323 and 34 IPC, on the ground that the matter had been amicably settled. The complainant, identified as the victim, filed …
The applicants, who are the husband, mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of the victim, were charged under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cruelty and other offences arising from a FIR filed in 2022. The victim later filed an affidavit stating …
The appellant, Rizwan Shaikh, was convicted of murder for stabbing Bakarali during a quarrel that arose while Shaikh was illegally connecting electricity wires to a hut. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses (relatives of the deceased), medical evidence of two stab wounds, and a recovered …
The victim filed an FIR alleging offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 and 34 IPC against her husband and his family members for alleged domestic abuse and misappropriation of her stridhan. The accused filed applications seeking quash of the criminal proceedings, claiming the matter had …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Subhash Bhimrao Pawar, who was charged with offences under IPC Sections 363, 376, 368 read with Section 34 …
Pratik Anil Kand, accused No.3 in C.R. No.20 of 2022, was charged with offences including murder, attempt to murder, robbery, and organised crime under the IPC, Arms Act, Criminal Law Amendment Act, Maharashtra Police Act and MCOC Act. He had been in custody for 4 years, 8 months and 16 days with …
The appellant, Rizwan Sarfaraj Shaikh, was convicted by the Sessions Court of murder (Sec.302 IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, arguing that the evidence did not prove pre‑meditation, that the weapon recovery did not satisfy Section 27 of the Evidence Act, and that the …
The petitioners, Bilal Dastagir Kureshi and another, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR alleging illegal cattle slaughter, possession of arms, and offences under the IPC. The prosecution narrated a raid on a …
The petitioners, three individuals, were externed from Mumbai and surrounding areas for two years under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act based on alleged offences related to tobacco and gutkha. They challenged the externment order, arguing that the offences cited were either under …
The High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Usha Raju Waman and Sagar Raju, accused of abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC in connection with the suicide of Houserao Shinde. The prosecution alleged that the accused threatened the deceased for repayment of money, leading …
The High Court considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Usha Raju Waman and Sagar Raju, accused of abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC in connection with the suicide of Houserao Shinde. The prosecution alleged that the accused threatened the deceased for repayment of money, leading …
The appellant, Mustafa Mehmood Sayed, has been in custody since October 2007 and seeks bail in a case involving alleged arms and explosives offences under multiple statutes, including the UAPA. The trial has progressed slowly, with only four witnesses examined while the prosecution expects to …
The appellants Rais Pal and Sadhu Ram were convicted for murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on the consistent ocular testimony of three eyewitnesses, including an injured witness, and medical evidence that corroborated the …
The appellant, Ramdatt Yadav, was charged under the Indian Penal Code for assault and under Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly insulting a Scheduled Caste victim inside a room. The appellant argued that the FIR was lodged after …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, summons and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 859 of 2023, which arose from a complaint under Sections 323 and 506 IPC. A compromise between the parties had been reached and subsequently …
The High Court considered a bail application filed on 30 September 2026 by Mohd. Naushad, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC arising from a 2009 loan fraud involving a property already mortgaged. The applicant argued that the loan of Rs. 4.5 lakh was …
The accused Ajay Shahi, Munna Kushwaha and Rajendra Rai were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in 2013 for offences under IPC sections 323, 34, 452, 504 and 506 based on the testimony of the complainant and his relatives. The appellants filed a criminal revision alleging that the FIR was …
Ramawadh @ Sheru Rajbhar applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3152 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 186 of 2020 under Sections 392 and 411 of the IPC. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced later in an informant's statement recorded under Section 161 of the CrPC, …
The revisionist Smt. Sunita Chaudhary filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's order dated 15 May 2017 that summoned the opposite parties under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code. The revision sought to set aside that order. However, the opposite parties had …
The applicant Subhash Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summoning order dated 14 May 2025 in Criminal Case No. 451 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant argued that …
The petitioners Alisher Khan and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash FIR No. 0009 of 2026 (registered on 20.01.2026 under IPC sections 85, 115(2), 105 and 89) and a mandamus directing the second respondent not to arrest them. The learned Additional …
The applicant, a police inspector, sought quashing of a charge‑sheet and criminal proceedings arising from an FIR alleging rape, assault, blackmail and offences under the IT Act. The victim alleged that the applicant deceived her with a false promise of marriage, spiked her drink, recorded obscene …
Hira Lal and others were convicted under IPC sections 323/34, 325/34 and 504, receiving six months, two years and one year of imprisonment respectively, along with fines. They filed a criminal revision contending that they had already served more than six months, suffered health ailments, were not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Altaf, accused in a case under Sections 131, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 105 of the IPC for assault leading to the death of the informant. The informant’s FIR alleged that Altaf and three others, armed with danda, assaulted him, but medical reports …
Petitioners Kanti Devi and others filed a writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 29‑April‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been amicably settled through a compromise deed verified by the Special Chief Judicial …
The applicant, Adil, was charged under IPC sections 376(3), 376(1), 506 and POCSO Act sections 5(3) and 2/6 for alleged offences in Muradnagar, Ghaziabad. His first bail application (No. 24585/2024) was rejected, but he filed a second bail petition (No. 17750/2026). The defence argued that the …
The applicant Lokendra Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate II, Kanpur Nagar, to dispose of Criminal Case No. 3060 of 2014 (State vs. Lokendra Singh), originally pending since 2009 under IPC sections 379 and 411. The applicant …
The petitioner, Suraj Kannaujiya, cleared the Uttar Pradesh Police Constable written exam, medical test and was declared successful, but his appointment was cancelled after a character verification report revealed two pending criminal cases – one under Section 60 of the U.P. Excise Act and another …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 443 of 2022, which pertained to crime No. 408 of 2020 involving offences under Sections 376, 377, 452, 323 and 506 of the IPC. The trial …
Ajay Chandra Seth, charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC for an offence alleged in a 2012 FIR, had been granted bail by the Sessions Court in 2014. The trial court cancelled his bail and issued a non‑bailable warrant because he failed to appear on three consecutive dates, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shyamveer in a case where a charge‑sheet under IPC sections 281, 191(2), 191(3), 352, 115(2) and 109 had been submitted. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was never arrested during investigation, and offered to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Brijesh @ Brajesh, who was charged under Section 64 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a medico‑legal report and forensic lab report that did not support …
The applicant, husband of a woman who died under unnatural circumstances, sought bail in a dowry‑related case (Crime No.286 of 2025) invoking Sections 85, 80(2) of the CrPC, Sections 238, 352 of the IPC, Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed false …
The applicants, police personnel including Jaysheel Tiwari, Ramkrit Yadav, Raj Kumar Verma and Angad Prasad Chaudhary, sought bail in connection with the custodial death of Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Pujari in Jaunpur in February 2021. The FIR alleged that the SOG team and police officials took the …
The applicant, Harun Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 7 January 2025 in Criminal Case No. 549 of 2025, which arose from an FIR under Section 507 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant …
The applicant, Prashant Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3115370 of 2025) that arose under several IPC sections and Section 66D of the IT Act. The trial court had verified that the parties had reached a written compromise, …
The applicant filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking relief against unauthorized constructions on a public path. The State complied with the court's earlier order and demolished the illegal structures. The applicant argued that, with the demolition completed, …
The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 131, 333, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed the FIR was filed under pressure and that affidavits from the injured parties indicated …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection of their life and liberty, alleging threats from private respondents. The court noted that petitioner No.1 is already married and is cohabiting with petitioner No.2 without a divorce, which could …
Rani and another filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 23 July 2026 passed by the Additional District and Session Judge in a session case involving offences under Sections 105 and 352 of the IPC. The High Court examined the record and …
Nem Singh appealed against the order of the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act that denied him bail in a case alleging rape, assault and other offences. The FIR alleged that the appellant had a consensual relationship with the victim, later threatened her, and was accused …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Aman, who had been in custody since August 8, 2024, in a case under IPC sections 109(1), 310(4), 310(6) and 317(5). The applicant’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, and had been detained for …
Juvenile X, aged 17 at the time of the alleged offence, was detained since March 2021 and denied bail by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act. The appellant appealed under Section 101(5) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, contending that none of the grounds for bail …
The petitioner, Rajjan Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Police Commissioner of Prayagraj to take action on an FIR dated 25‑01‑2020 (Case Crime No. 65 of 2020) involving offences under sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 427 of the IPC and sections …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mu Raju Farooki, who was summoned under Section 319 CrPC despite not being named in the FIR or the victim's statements. The applicant had been subject to non‑bailable …
Vishal Soni applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 273 of 2025) where he was charged under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 317(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the alleged recovery of a motorcycle from his possession lacked …
Ranveer, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 80(2), 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no material to establish the statutory presumption of dowry death, and that the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Naveen Rai under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving alleged assault under several IPC sections. The applicant argued he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no criminal record, with only call detail records …
Manjit Chauhan applied for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 352, 351(2) of the IPC, Section 69 of the BNS Act and Section 67 of the Income Tax Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in an alleged sexual assault …
The applicants Ashok, Gangaram, Vinod and Pramod filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Special Trial No. 293 of 2016, which involved charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 325 and Section 3(1)(X) of the SC/ST Act. A coordinate bench of the Allahabad High Court had …
The petitioner filed an FIR on 20 May 2016 (Case Crime No. 277 of 2016) alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 471, 467, 468, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The trial court, after a protest petition, ordered a …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 328, 354 and 506 IPC. The applicant alleged false implication and argued that the material on record did not …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sukhveer, who was arrested in Crime No. 192 of 2026 under IPC sections 310(2) and 317(3) and CrPC section 61(2). The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating that his name was added to the FIR based on an informer's tip and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bablu Khan, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide after a domestic dispute. He was charged under Sections 85, 80(2), 123, 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act in connection with a alleged dowry‑related …
The applicant, Sugam @ Shubham, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 42 of 2004) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel requested …
Rais Ahmad filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC for alleged offences under Sections 323, 420, 427, 447, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. The Attorney General objected, arguing that the offences do not carry imprisonment exceeding seven years, a charge‑sheet has already been filed and …
The applicant, Vinay Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, Prayagraj, to decide a pending application dated 12 June 2025 filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C./358 BNSS in the criminal case State …
Shivam Sonkar, accused of offences under IPC sections 323 and 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4, had been in custody since June 15, 2024. His first bail application was rejected on February 24, 2026. He filed a second bail application arguing that only four witnesses had been examined, there was no …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mustakim, a marginal witness to a sale deed, in a criminal case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections. The applicant argued he had no criminal antecedents, was not a beneficiary of the transaction, and had previously …
The petitioners, Chhotu @ Akhilesh and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 11‑05‑2026, the cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 12177 of 2026) arising out of Crime No. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pushpendra in a criminal case (Crime No. 427 of 2026) involving alleged recovery of copper slabs. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, and that there was no …
The applicant, a informant in a criminal matter (State vs. Ravi Jaiswal), filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking an order directing the trial court to expedite the hearing of the pending case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition …
The applicant, Shamim Ahmad, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 26 of 2005) involving an alleged offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the reissuance of his passport, which was pending before the Regional Passport Officer. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a pending criminal case (case crime no. 0233 of 2026) …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and move a regular bail application in the underlying criminal case (Crime No. 192 of 2010) involving offences under Sections 419, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Krishan Kumar in Crime No.462 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 420, 406, 447, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant feared arrest and had also moved a Section 482 petition to quash the charge sheet and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aneesh Maratha in a case involving alleged theft of mobile phones and charges under IPC sections 310(2), 317(3), 112(2) and 317(5). The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, the IMEI number of the alleged stolen phone was omitted, …
The applicant, Dr. Anant Kumar Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 652 of 2026) involving alleged assault by a vehicle he owned. The FIR alleged that the driver, after a verbal spat, reversed the car and struck the informant, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash Complaint No. 787 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 392, 323, 452 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. They asserted that they had reached an out‑of‑court compromise with the second …
The applicant, Roop Kishore @ Rupa, was arrested in Crime No. 154 of 2025 under IPC sections 303(2) and 317(2), 317(4). He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons and his name appeared only in the confessional statements of a co‑accused, with no …
The petitioner, Lalit Kumar, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Meerut, to conclude a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 129/2023) filed under Sections 417 and 494 of the IPC. The petitioner argued …
The accused, Prakashi, applied for bail in a 1995 case under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 307, claiming false implication. He argued that the trial was stayed under a Section 482 application in 1997, the stay was later vacated in 2010, and no process was ever served on him. He surrendered in May …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sarvesh Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1) and 333 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and pointed to the bail already granted to …
The petitioner, Vikram Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents, the Union of India and others, argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case pending against him …
Petitioners Sanjeev Kumar Gupta and another filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 12‑09‑2026 lodged in Crime No. 0610 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 506 and 387 IPC (criminal intimidation and attempt to murder). The Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima …
The applicants, Mohit and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi Diwakar, who was in custody for offences under Sections 326(g) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that there was no injury, and that he would not misuse liberty if released. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a pending criminal case (IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 147) registered as case …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Pankak Kumar under CrPC Section 482 in a rape‑related case (IPC Sections 64(2), 333, 351(3)). The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and inconsistencies in the victim's statements, and offered to cooperate with …
The petitioners Abrar and another filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. Both the State counsel and the informant's counsel did not oppose the petitioners' request to approach the trial court for regular bail. The High Court directed that the petitioners must appear …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Mohammad Ashgar @ Ajgar and another accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 64 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 309(6), 331(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed innocence, alleged false …
The accused, Sohit Singh, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 194 of 2026) involving alleged assault under Sections 109, 352 and 351(3) of the IPC. He claimed false implication, stating the FIR was lodged belatedly and that the assault was attributed to him only later, while he has no …
The applicants, Asif Ali and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash pending criminal proceedings arising from cases under IPC sections 498A, 323, 376, 511 and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute through a compromise, which …
The applicants, Akhil Gupta and Nihal Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 288 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(da)(dha) of the SC/ST Act. The …
The applicant, Ajay, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 820 of 2026) under IPC sections 331(4), 305 and 317(2) and had been in custody since 20 June 2026. He claimed that he was falsely implicated, that the alleged recovery was fabricated, and that there were no independent witnesses …
Vishnu Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 126 of 2026) involving charges under several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting the informant Bheem Singh and his son Anil with various weapons, resulting in serious head injuries. The prosecution argued that Singh had a specific role …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 380 of 2026) arising from an FIR alleging offences under Section 420 IPC and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act. The High Court examined the record and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aditya, who was arrested in Crime No.73 of 2026 under several IPC sections and sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated based on an informer's tip, and that there was no …
Virendra was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 147, 148, 302 and 149 IPC but the investigating officer did not file a charge‑sheet against him, exonerating him after investigation. After the trial of co‑accused concluded, the trial court, on an application under Section 319 CrPC/358 BNSS, …
The applicants were summoned by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Etah under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, and a non‑bailable warrant was issued against them. They filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summons and the warrant. Counsel for the applicants …
The applicant, Aditya Prakash (Aditya Rathore), filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal complaint (No. 228 of 2021) and a summoning order dated 19‑02‑2026 issued under Sections 392 and 323 of the IPC. The applicant did not press the merits of the quash …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Govind Yadav, who is accused under IPC sections 310(2) and 317(3) in a case registered at Police Station Tharvai, Prayagraj. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that only Rs.350 was recovered from his …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a summons dated 07‑03‑2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Complaint No. 54009‑2025. They alleged that the summons was issued without proper compliance with Section 223(1) of the B.N.S.S., as the process …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 17‑05‑2024 issued in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 352, 354‑B, 323 and 506 IPC. The applicant alleged that the prosecution was malicious and that no …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra @ Sheru and two others, who were in custody since July 8, 2026 for offences under Sections 305(a), 331(3), 317(2) and 112 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed innocence, stating the FIR was lodged against an unknown …
The petitioner, an advocate, challenged the cancellation of his firearm licence, arguing that he had been acquitted in nine criminal cases and only one case remained pending. The pending case (Crime No. 155/2023) involves serious offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 354Kha, 452, 308 and 34 of the …
The applicants, Qamar Ahmad alias Munna and another, filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the order dated 02‑09‑2026 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No. 6583 of 2024) under IPC sections 380, 147, 323, 504 and 452. They argued that the first applicant is a disabled …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajeet Prasad, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 105 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged with an inordinate delay, and that the prosecution …
The applicant, Sarfaraj, filed a bail application in a cyber‑crime case (Cr. No. 37 of 2025) alleging that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated by a co‑accused’s statement, which the court found unreliable. No independent witness or corroborative evidence linked him to the alleged …
The applicants, Ramendra Singh (also known as Ravindra) and Sanjay Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 110, 117(2) and 118(1) of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramhari Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 12 of 2026) involving several IPC offences including sections 316(2), 340(2), 336(3), 61(2), 338 and 318(4). The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, was not …
Manish applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 538 of 2026) involving alleged firing under Sections 109(1), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR, lodged on 2 June 2026, alleged that Manish and five others surrounded the victim and his friend over a money dispute, with the victim …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Poonam Devi, who was in custody for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, that the dispute was essentially civil, and that she had no role …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Patiram under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with charges under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and Section 420 of the IPC. The applicant had been arrested on the spot while driving a vehicle carrying 400 …
The petitioner, a government assistant teacher, was suspended and jailed on 3 September 2019 after an FIR was lodged under Sections 498‑A, 304‑B, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act following his wife's suicide. He was reinstated on 24 November 2022 on the condition that salary for the suspension …
Rizwan applied for bail in a 2009 case (Crime No. 1482) involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471, where he is accused of taking a loan on a property already mortgaged. He had previously been granted bail but failed to appear, leading to his re‑arrest on 14‑09‑2025 and …
The applicant, Dalpat Singh, filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the Special Sessions Trial No. 352 of 2018, which involved charges under Section 363 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, as well as to set aside the charge‑sheet and …
The accused Bunty applied for bail in a criminal case involving sections of the IPC and CrPC, alleging false implication in an FIR filed by the victim. He claimed the FIR and medico‑legal report were unduly delayed and that a civil dispute with the victim's father motivated the complaint. The …
Phoolchanra Kushwaha Urf Dayasagar filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and stay the proceedings in a POCSO case (Sections 354‑A IPC, 7/8 POCSO Act, 3(2)va SC/ST Act). The applicant prayed for the entire proceeding to be set aside. On the hearing …
The accused Teetu applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 178 of 2024) involving alleged robbery of a woman, with the FIR lodged on 13.07.2024. The prosecution’s case rests solely on a disclosure statement and recovered articles, with no identification parade conducted. The applicant has a substantial …
Mushtaque Alam, an additional director of Shine City, was arrested in connection with alleged fraud and conspiracy offences (IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B) and has been in custody since October 2021. He filed a bail application during the early stage of trial, contending that he was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Sahil alias Nirhu, who is charged under Sections 498‑A, 304‑B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in connection with the death of his wife. The trial court had already rejected his first bail plea, noting …
Petitioners Nanhi Devi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 25‑11‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them under several IPC sections. They argued that the investigation was complete and a …
The Bombay High Court considered bail applications filed by accused No.1 (Mangesh Baburao Savkar) and accused No.3 (Deepak Ashok Bharudkar) in a murder‑conspiracy case (CR No. I‑198/2021) involving offences under Sections 302, 120B, 279, 337, 338, 304‑A of the IPC and Sections 184, 134 and 187 of …
The applicant, a General Manager in the Priority Sector Department of Central Bank of India, was charged with criminal conspiracy, cheating, and corruption for allegedly facilitating a Rs 50 crore loan to M/s Biotor Industries Ltd. that was purportedly meant for farmers but was instead routed to …
The applicant, Anil Tikam, a Deputy General Manager in the Priority Sector Department of the Central Bank of India, was charged with conspiracy, cheating, forgery and corruption for allegedly facilitating a Rs 50 crore loan to M/s Biotor Industries Ltd. The prosecution alleged that the loan was …
The petitioner, a Sub‑Registrar, was indicted for allegedly registering a fabricated Power of Attorney that was used to obtain a loan. He filed a writ petition challenging the charge‑sheet, arguing that prosecution of a government servant requires prior sanction under Section 197(1)(b) of the CrPC, …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Pappu @ Shafiul Ahamad Aaynaal Miya, accused No.1 in a murder case (IPC Sections 302 and 34). The prosecution’s case rests on circumstantial evidence and the victim’s dying …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Rohit Kamalakar Kamble, who had been in custody since October 2020 for alleged offences including murder, rioting, criminal conspiracy and violations under the Arms Act, Maharashtra Police …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Reshma Amit Gharat, a co‑accused in a case involving alleged cheating, criminal breach of trust, criminal intimidation and violations of the Maharashtra Protection of …
The appellant, Dilip Suresh Thatshingar, was convicted of murder under Section 302 of the IPC for the death of a 16‑year‑old girl who had been residing with him. He appealed the conviction, arguing that the evidence, particularly the eye‑witness testimony of PW 10 and the forensic findings, was …
The High Court considered the bail application of Shaidul Akbarali Mir, accused of offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, alleged to have lured a minor into a relationship and forced her into prostitution. The applicant had been in custody for over two years …
The petitioner, Kunal Birwadkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the bail granted on 1 February 2018 to Respondent No.2 in a case under IPC sections 506(2) and 506(4). He alleged that he had been threatened, relying on complaints dated 3 July 2017 and …
The appellant, Chetan Dadaji Pawar, appealed against the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting his bail application in a murder case under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The incident involved the alleged strangulation of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Anmuddin Allauddin Chakure, who is accused of murdering his wife under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant had been in custody for nearly five years without any …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Tohid Samir Shaikh, who is accused of murder, attempted murder, and related offences under the IPC, Arms Act and Maharashtra Police Act. The applicant had been in custody for three …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Manoj Popatrao Musudage, a director of a company that had granted a Rs.27‑crore loan to the principal accused. He was charged with offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Sachin Dilip Sonwane, accused of murder, attempted murder and abetment of suicide under IPC Sections 302, 307 and 201 read with 34. The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony of the …
The Bombay High Court considered bail applications filed by accused No.1 (Mangesh Baburao Savkar) and accused No.3 (Deepak Ashok Bharudkar) in a murder‑conspiracy case (CR No. I‑198/2021) involving offences under Sections 302, 120B, 279, 337, 338, 304‑A of the IPC and Sections 184, 134 and 187 of …
The applicant, Nitin @ Menya Ankush Metkari, sought bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for a murder case (CR No.75 of 2019) involving multiple serious offences. He had been in custody for over seven years while the trial had just begun, with only two of the anticipated 78 …
The applicants, owners of a property and former partners in Venkateshwara Construction Firm, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Samhita, 2023, in connection with offences under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and the Bhartiya Nyaya …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Mahesh Rajendra Ambilwade, who was alleged to have assaulted and outraged the modesty of a woman who later committed suicide. The prosecution alleged that the …
The Central Bank of India filed a complaint alleging that Biotor Industries Ltd and its officials conspired to cheat the bank by obtaining a Rs 50 crore loan through forged farmer documents and misusing a Management‑and‑Collection agent. The applicant, Anil Tikam, was the Executive Director of the …
The appellants Suresh and Naresh were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Moradabad, for a robbery and dacoity (IPC §§395, 397) that occurred on 31 March 1978 when armed miscreants looted passengers from a factory vehicle at a railway crossing. The trial court relied on prompt FIR filing, …
The case arose from an alleged kidnapping of a girl (referred to as “X”) on 4 November 1985, for which an FIR was lodged under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court convicted Devendra Singh, sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for both offences. On appeal, the appellant …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, summons and the entire criminal proceedings (Case Crime No. 456 of 2023) relating to offences under Sections 323, 504 and 325 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise which was …
An FIR was lodged alleging that thirteen accused, armed with lathis and firearms, attacked the complainant's house, injuring three persons with gunshots. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 324, 147 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code, granting them probation, while acquitting them of …
The appellants, Sant Lal Vishwakarma and others, appealed against a conviction under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506 handed down by the Additional Session Judge, Allahabad. Both parties later entered into a compromise settlement, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on …
The applicant, Dr. Tauseef Ahmad Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings (case crime no. 95 of 2025) pending before the Sambhal trial court. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and the trial court verified the compromise on …
