Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 14201–14400

FAHIM KHANversusSTATE OF BIHAR NOW JHARKHAND

2011 INSC 325Dismissed

The appellant Fahim Khan and two others were accused of murdering Sagir Hasan Siddique. The trial court acquitted them, but the High Court set aside the acquittal, finding the trial court's judgment perverse and convicting the appellant. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the High Court …

CBI, HYDERABADversusSUBRAMANI GOPALAKRISHNAN & ANR.

2011 INSC 326Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) appealed against the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s order granting bail to S. Gopalakrishnan (external auditor) and V.S. Prabhakara Gupta (internal auditor) in the massive Satyam corporate fraud case. The Supreme Court examined whether the bail was justified …

MD. MANNAN @ ABDUL MANNANversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2011 INSC 319Dismissed

The appellant, Md. Mannan, a mason employed in the victim's grandfather's house, sent a seven‑year‑old girl to a betel shop and subsequently abducted her on his bicycle, raping and murdering her. He later confessed, leading police to the body. He was convicted under IPC sections 366, 376, 302 and …

GURMAIL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 321Appeal(s) allowed

A family dispute arose after the daughter Nindo was teased, leading eight accused to raise a lalkara and attack members of the rival family with knives and lathis. Baljinder Singh received a deep stab wound to the abdomen, a vital organ, and died shortly thereafter; Rajwinder Singh was also injured. …

INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADUversusJOHN DAVID

2011 INSC 316Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu, appealed the High Court's acquittal of John David, who was charged with the gruesome murder of a medical student whose body was dismembered and disposed of in various locations. The trial court had convicted David under IPC sections 302, 201, 364 and …

GOPALversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2011 INSC 314Dismissed

The appellant Gopal was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly pouring kerosene on his wife Mallavva and setting her ablaze, leading to her death. The prosecution's case relied primarily on the victim's dying declaration recorded by police officer PW‑13, which was …

BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLANversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2011 INSC 307Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ filed by Bachpan Bachao Andolan seeking protection for children employed in Indian circuses, who were subjected to physical, sexual and emotional abuse and denied education. The Court examined whether such employment violated the children’s …

WAIKHOM YAIMA SINGHversusSTATE OF MANIPUR

2011 INSC 310Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased was found unconscious on the road and taken to a hospital where he allegedly regained consciousness and made an oral dying declaration accusing Waikhom Yaima Singh of assault before dying the next morning. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the dying declaration unreliable …

BHANU VALVEversusSTATE

2011 INSC 312Dismissed

The petitioner, a father, was convicted of repeatedly raping his own daughter over a period of five years, resulting in the birth of a child. The trial court and the Bombay High Court at Goa upheld the conviction under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner filed a Special Leave …

VEERAN & ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2011 INSC 297Case Partly allowed

The case involved an altercation between two rival groups in which appellant No.1, Veeran, struck the deceased, Daddu, on the head with a gandasa, causing his death, while the other accused inflicted injuries on witnesses. The trial courts convicted all four surviving accused under Section 302/149 …

BABULAL SAHUversusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH

2011 INSC 298Dismissed

Babulal Sahu was convicted under Section 302 IPC for strangling his wife Basanti Bai after she refused his demand for sexual intercourse. The appellant argued that the killing fell within Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, which would reduce the offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder …

KULVINDER SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2011 INSC 290Dismissed

Kulvinder Singh and Jasvinder Singh were convicted of murder under IPC s.302 read with s.34 for the killing of Amardeep. The prosecution relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence: a motive arising from a prior quarrel, the accused’s presence near the victim before the crime, witnesses hearing …

KULDIP YADAV & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2011 INSC 286Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from two FIRs (11/97 and 12/97) lodged on 28‑29 April 1997 concerning a violent incident in which a man named Suresh Yadav died and several others were injured. Eleven accused were charged under IPC sections 302, 324 and 149 and were convicted by the trial court, a decision affirmed …

SUNITA KUMARI KASHYAPversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2011 INSC 291Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant-wife alleged that her husband and in‑laws subjected her to dowry‑related cruelty and forced her to leave the matrimonial home in Ranchi and return to her parental home in Gaya. She filed an FIR in Gaya under IPC sections 498A, 406 r/w 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The …

NARMADA BAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS

2011 INSC 285Case Allowed

Narmada Bai, the mother of Tulsiram Prajapati, filed a writ petition under Article 32 alleging that her son was killed in a fake police encounter in Gujarat and that senior police officials and a politician were involved. She sought a direction for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to …

REKHAversusSTATE OF T NADU TR.SEC.TO GOVT. & ANR.

2011 INSC 267Appeal(s) allowed

Rekha, the wife of a man accused of selling expired drugs with tampered labels, challenged his preventive detention order under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982. The High Court dismissed her habeas corpus petition, but the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the …

K. P. THIMMAPPA GOWDAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2011 INSC 256Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.P. Thimmappa Gowda, was charged under Section 376 IPC for having sexual intercourse with Rathnamma, an 18‑year‑old woman, on a false promise of marriage, resulting in the birth of a child. The FIR was lodged on 4 January 1996, nearly eight months after the alleged acts, and the …

RUKIA BEGUMversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2011 INSC 265Disposed off

The case involved the murder of Rasheed Sait and his wife, for which eight persons were tried under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 and Section 120‑B of the IPC. The trial court acquitted Rukia Begum and Nasreen, finding that motive, a bucket and a plastic pot did not sufficiently link them …

CHANDRAN @ MANICHAN @ MANIYANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2011 INSC 264Disposed off

The case involved a massive spurious liquor tragedy in Kerala where 31 people died and many were injured after consuming liquor adulterated with methyl alcohol. The accused, a group of brothers and their associates, were charged under the Abkari Act, particularly Section 57A, for mixing or …

SHINDO ALIAS SAWINDER KAUR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 247Appeal(s) allowed

Balbir Kaur died from severe burns allegedly after her mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law demanded additional dowry. Two dying declarations were recorded by an ASI and a magistrate, but the trial court rejected them as unreliable because the victim had 100% burn injuries. The High Court, relying on the …

STATE OF U.P.versusPREETAM & ORS.

2011 INSC 248Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh charged Preetam and four others with murder, assault and rioting under Sections 302, 149, 307 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code for the killing of Guiab and Chhatrapal. The trial court convicted them, but the Allahabad High Court acquitted them on the ground of …

CHANDRA BONIAversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2011 INSC 240Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Chandra Sonia, convicted of double murder under IPC s.302 and sentenced to life imprisonment on two counts. The prosecution's case rested on an extra‑judicial confession made by the accused to a neighbor (PW 7) on the day of the murders and on the recovery of …

SUBRAMANI @ JEEVA @ KULLAJEEVAversusS.H.O., ODIYANSALAI

2011 INSC 242Dismissed

On 4 November 1991, at a restaurant in Pondicherry, Subramani and six others attacked PW1, his brother Tamilvendhan and friends, stabbing Tamilvendhan to death. PW1 survived with injuries and identified Subramani in a test identification parade. The trial court acquitted all accused, doubting PW1's …

MEHBOOB BATCHA AND ORS.versusSTATE REP. BY SUPDT. OF POLICE

2011 INSC 229Dismissed

The appellants, police officers, illegally detained Nandagopal, beat him to death in police custody and gang‑raped his wife Padmini within the police station. The trial court and High Court convicted them based on the testimony of 37 witnesses, including the victim, and sentenced one officer to …

RANJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 230Appeal(s) allowed

Ranjit Singh was charged with murdering his wife Gurmail Kaur on 1 September 1990, with the prosecution alleging that he, his sisters and his grandmother participated in the killing. The evidence consisted of a post‑mortem report indicating strangulation, an electric wire found near the body, and …

BINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.

2011 INSC 234Dismissed

The case concerned a multi‑crore iron‑ore mining lease scam involving former ministers of Jharkhand, including a former chief minister, with allegations of illicit wealth amassed through abuse of official position. The High Court, noting the complexity and trans‑national nature of the alleged …

R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIRversusTHE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT VIGILANCE POLICE & ANR.

2011 INSC 226Appeal(s) allowed

R. Ramachandran Nair, the first Vice‑Chancellor of Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, was accused of obtaining a pecuniary advantage while overseeing earth‑filling of university land. An FIR was lodged in 1996 and a charge‑sheet filed after an 8½‑year delay, without obtaining the prior …

RAJESH SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2011 INSC 227Dismissed

The appellants were charged with murdering an eleven‑year‑old boy who was beaten and later found hanged in a house belonging to one of them. The trial court acquitted them, dismissing the testimony of two eye‑witnesses and the medical evidence, and questioning the timing of the FIR and the …

CHILDLINE INDIA FOUNDATION & ANR.versusALLAN JOHN WATERS & ORS.

2011 INSC 225Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals filed by Childline India Foundation and the State of Maharashtra against the Bombay High Court’s order acquitting three accused of sexual and physical abuse of children in Anchorage Shelter Homes in Mumbai. The trial court had convicted the accused under IPC …

STATE OF M.P.versusRAMESH AND ANR.

2011 INSC 221Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court’s acquittal of Ramesh and Bhaggo Bai for the murder of Bhaggo’s husband, Chatra. The prosecution’s case rested primarily on the testimony of an eight‑year‑old daughter, Ran nu Bai, who alleged that the accused beat the deceased, supported …

RAVINDRA PAL SINGHversusAJIT SINGH & ANR

2011 INSC 217Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, whose son was allegedly killed in a fake police encounter, filed a criminal case against five police officers under Sections 120B, 364, 302, 201 and 1208 of the IPC. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigated the matter and submitted a charge‑sheet implicating the …

COMMR. OF POLICE AND ORSversusSANDEEP KUMAR

2011 INSC 219Dismissed

Sandeep Kumar applied for the post of Head Constable in 1999 and answered "No" to a question about any arrest, prosecution, detention, fine or conviction. He had earlier been involved in a criminal case (FIR 362 under IPC sections 325/34) that was compromised and he was acquitted in 1998, but …

RAVINDRA PAL SINGHversusSANTOSH KUMAR JAISWAL & ORS.

2011 INSC 220Disposed off

The father of a deceased student filed a transfer petition under Section 46 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging that his son was killed in a fake police encounter in Dehradun and that the local police continued to exert undue influence over the CBI investigation. The petitioner claimed …

HARICHARAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS,

2011 INSC 194Dismissed

The case concerned the custodial death of Mathura, who was taken into police custody, subjected to electric shock torture, and died shortly after release. The trial court acquitted the police officers, but the High Court convicted them under IPC sections 304 Part II and 330, relying on medical …

NILESH DINKAR PARADKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 195Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Nilesh Dinkar Paradkar, was convicted under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOCA) and the IPC based largely on voice identification of a recorded telephone conversation. The High Court upheld his conviction while acquitting the other accused, relying on the officer's …

STATE OF U.P.versusNARESH AND ORS.

2011 INSC 189Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted four accused for the murder of Sri Ram and the serious gunshot injuries to Balak Ram arising from a dispute on 16 October 1979. The trial court convicted them under sections 302, 307 and 379 of the IPC, but the Allahabad High Court acquitted them, relying on …

ARUNA RAMCHANDRA SHANBAUGversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2011 INSC 187Dismissed

The petition sought permission to discontinue life‑supporting treatment for Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug, a 60‑year‑old woman in a persistent vegetative state for 37 years following a violent assault. The Court examined medical evidence, concluding that she was not brain‑dead and retained minimal …

CENTRE FOR PIL & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2011 INSC 175Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined the legality of Shri P.J. Thomas's appointment as Central Vigilance Commissioner under Section 4(1) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, which was based on a recommendation by the High Powered Committee (HPC). The Court found that the HPC failed to consider …

PRAHALAD PATELversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2011 INSC 171Dismissed

Prahalad Patel was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murdering Daulat, the brother of two witnesses, after a petty dispute over thrown bushes. The prosecution presented eye‑witness testimony, corroborative statements from the victim's brothers, medical reports indicating homicidal injuries, …

M. MOHANversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

2011 INSC 168Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Kamatchi committed suicide by hanging herself four days after being denied the use of a family car, an incident for which her husband and sister‑in‑law were initially charged under Sections 304‑B, 498‑A and 306 IPC. The appellants – the husband’s brothers and mother‑in‑law – were also …

ASHOK KUMAR TODIversusKISHWAR JAHAN & ORS.

2011 INSC 170Disposed off

Rizwanur Rahman married Priyanka Todi under the Special Marriage Act. After the marriage, police officials repeatedly interfered, threatened the couple and later the deceased was found dead on railway tracks. The mother and brother of the deceased filed a writ petition seeking transfer of the …

SWAPAN KUMAR SENAPATIversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2011 INSC 157Disposed off

The appellant, Swapan Kumar Senapati, assaulted his uncle Satkari Senapati by sitting on his chest and allegedly striking his head with a stone. The victim died three days later from intracranial hemorrhage, with no external injuries found at autopsy. The FIR was lodged three days after the …

TUKARAM & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 160Disposed off

The deceased Prakash was assaulted after a marriage ceremony by members of two rival groups of the Dalit Mukti Sena. He sustained a buttock wound and later developed internal injuries, leading to his death after eighteen days of hospitalization. The trial court convicted the accused of murder …

NARAYAN DUTT AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2011 INSC 161Disposed off

The Additional Sessions Judge convicted Narayan Dutt, Manjit Singh and Prem Kumar for murder under the IPC and sentenced them to life imprisonment. While their appeals were pending before the High Court, they filed petitions under Article 161 of the Constitution seeking pardon from the Governor of …

AMERIKA RAI & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2011 INSC 153Disposed off

The case arose from a violent incident that followed a marriage ceremony in Vaishali district, where six accused formed an unlawful assembly and opened fire, killing Shankar Rai and injuring his brother Dineshwar Rai. The prosecution proved that the accused slapped and fisted the bride's …

BALDEV SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 149Disposed off

In 1997 the prosecutrix was abducted, raped and beaten by three accused who were later convicted under IPC sections 376(2)(g) and 342 and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 1,000 each. The accused had already served about three and a half years when they appealed to the …

DAYAL DASversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2011 INSC 146Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dayal Das, was convicted under IPC sections 304(Part‑II) and 328 and Rajasthan Excise Act s.54‑A for the death of Lal Chand, who allegedly died after consuming illicit liquor at the appellant's soda‑lemon shop. The sole evidence linking the appellant was the statement of PW‑12, who …

RAMESHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2011 INSC 148Dismissed

The case involved the murder of money‑lender RL and his wife during a robbery of their house‑cum‑shop, where the accused A‑1 (Gordhan Lal), A‑2 (Bharat Kumar) and A‑3 (Ramesh) were convicted of murder, robbery and related offences. The prosecution relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence, …

RAVIversusBADRINARAYAN AND ORS.

2011 INSC 139Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ravi, a minor, was severely injured when a truck reversed and struck him, resulting in permanent 50% disability. His father lodged the FIR three months after the accident, citing the child's critical condition and lack of legal awareness as reasons for the delay. The Motor Accident …

SURENDRA KOLIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2011 INSC 127Dismissed

Surendra Koli, a servant of Maninder Singh Pandher, was convicted of multiple murders of children in Nithari, Noida, where he allegedly lured, strangulated, dismembered and ate the victims. He gave a voluntary confession before a magistrate under Section 164 of the CrPC, which was corroborated by …

SHEO SHANKAR SINGHversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

2011 INSC 125Case Partly allowed

The appellants Sheo Shankar Singh and Umesh Singh were convicted for the murder of MLA Gurudas Chatterjee, who was shot from a motorcycle while riding pillion. The prosecution relied on the eye‑witness testimony of two riders, corroborated by seizure of the motorcycles, blood‑stained clothing, empty …

BANSI LALversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2011 INSC 120Dismissed

Bansi Lal was convicted under Sections 498-A, 304-B and 306 of the IPC for the suicide of his wife Sarla, who had left the matrimonial home after a year of marriage, stayed with her parents for 14 months, and returned following a panchayat assurance. The prosecution proved a consistent demand for a …

BUDHADEV KARMASKARversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2011 INSC 124Hearing Adjourned

The appellant Budhaev Karmaskar was convicted of murdering a sex worker, Chayay Rani Pal, by repeatedly striking her head, causing fatal injuries. Eye‑witness testimony and a detailed post‑mortem report established the brutality of the assault and the cause of death. The trial court sentenced him to …

V.S. ACHUTHANANDANversusR. BALAKRISHNA PILLAI & ORS.

2011 INSC 116Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the award of a hydro‑electric project contract by the Kerala State Electricity Board to K.P. Poulose at rates far above the probable amount, allegedly facilitated by Minister R. Balakrishna Pillai, a Board member and a close associate. The prosecution proved that the Minister, the …

BACHNI DEVI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT

2011 INSC 108Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by Bachni Devi and her son, convicted under Section 304B of the IPC for the dowry death of the son’s wife, Kanta, who died by hanging within three months of marriage. The prosecution proved that Kanta’s death was unnatural, occurred within seven years of …

KILAKKATHA PARAMBATH SASI & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2011 INSC 101Dismissed

The appellants, members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, were alleged to have formed an unlawful assembly and attacked a Congress worker (PW‑1) and his brother on a bus, resulting in the brother's death. The trial court acquitted all seven accused, but the Kerala High Court reversed the acquittal of …

NACHHATTAR SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 95Appeal(s) allowed

Balbir Kaur, a married woman, was found dead from poisoning. The prosecution alleged that her husband and parents-in-law demanded dowry and subjected her to cruelty, leading to her suicide. The trial court convicted the parents-in-law under Section 3048 (dowry death); the High Court acquitted them …

JAGGA SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 96Disposed off

The case involved three accused who shot Baggar Singh, injuring his leg, and subsequently abducted Hoshiar Singh, whose body was found the next morning with only lacerated wounds and no gunshot injury. The trial court convicted them under Section 307 IPC, while the High Court upheld a conviction for …

R.S. MISHRAversusSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS.

2011 INSC 87Dismissed

The appellant, a retired Additional Sessions Judge, was criticised by a High Court Single Judge for not framing a charge under Section 302 IPC in a murder trial, instead framing only Section 304 and 323 IPC without recording any reasons. The Supreme Court examined the interplay between Sections 227 …

KOLLA VEERA RAGHAV RAOversusGORANTALA VENKATESWARA RAO AND ANR.

2011 INSC 88Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kolla Veera Raghav Rao, had been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. He was later prosecuted under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code for the same set of facts. The central issue was whether Section 300(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, which …

B.A. UMESHversusREGR.GEN.HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

2011 INSC 89Dismissed

The appellant B.A. Umesh was convicted of rape, murder and robbery (IPC ss.376, 302, 392) and sentenced to death. The Supreme Court examined the prosecution's case, which relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence, eyewitness testimony, a test identification parade, fingerprint evidence, forensic …

SOU. SANDHYA MANOJ WANKHADEversusMANOJ BHIMRAO WANKHADE & ORS.

2011 INSC 83Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sandhya Manoj Wankhade, filed a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against her husband and his mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law. The trial court and the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court deleted the mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law from the …

STATE THROUGH C.B.I.versusMAHENDER SINGH DAHIYA

2011 INSC 80Dismissed

The State alleged that Dr. Mahender Singh Dahiya strangulated his wife Namita during their honeymoon in Brussels, dismembered her body and disposed of the parts, while the prosecution failed to produce a weapon, reliable forensic identification of the body parts, or a clear motive. The trial court …

ASHOK SURAJLAL ULKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 76Dismissed

The appellant, a school teacher, was convicted under Section 376 of the IPC for raping a 15‑year‑old girl. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, and the medical examination, conducted after three days, did not conclusively prove rape, though it noted a minor finger injury and a …

SUKHBIR SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 78Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a dispute over school land in Punjab where the village sarpanch, Jaswant Singh, was shot dead. The FIR described the killers as two Sikh youths aged 25‑30 wearing kurta pajamas, but no names were given. The two accused, Sukhbir Singh and Dilbagh Singh, were arrested six months …

DURBALversusSTATE OF U.P.

2011 INSC 68Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved an alleged assault and murder of the father and nephew of PW‑1 (Kaldhari) by three accused (A‑1, A‑2, A‑3) using knives and spears. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the testimony of PW‑1 and two other eyewitnesses (PW‑2, PW‑3), who claimed to have identified the accused with …

M/S. B.FINE ART AUCTIONEERS PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusC.B.I. & ANR

2011 INSC 70Dismissed

The appellants, two fine‑art auctioneers, auctioned two paintings that were later seized by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) as antiques. The CBI, relying on the ASI report, registered an FIR under IPC s.120B and the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 s.25(1) read with s.3, and filed a …

KANAKA REKHA NAIKversusMANOJ KUMAR PRADHAN & ANR.

2011 INSC 72Appeal(s) allowed

Manoj Kumar Pradhan, a sitting MLA, was convicted under IPC sections 147, 326 read with 149 and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. He and another convict appealed, and the Orissa High Court granted him bail on the same day, citing his status as an MLA. The appellant, Kanaka Rekha Naik, …

MANJIT SINGH @ MANGEversusCBI, THROUGH ITS S.P.

2011 INSC 73Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals against a Designated Court (TADA) judgment that convicted three men for the murder of Additional Collector L.D. Arora under the IPC and acquitted them of TADA charges. The key issues were the admissibility of confessional statements made by co‑accused under TADA …

AMAR BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2011 INSC 69Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused of raping his daughter-in-law in the family home on 2 April 1989, an incident allegedly witnessed by several family members and resulting in the victim's bleeding. The trial court convicted him under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to seven years' …

GURDIAL SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 64Dismissed

The appellants Gurdial Singh, Bakshish Singh and Darshan Singh attempted to divert a village drain towards the house of Buta Singh despite a court injunction. When Buta Singh objected, the appellants, armed with a gandasi and dangs, assaulted him and several witnesses; Buta Singh later died from his …

RAMESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI RATHODversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2011 INSC 65Disposed off

Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod, a 27‑year‑old watchman, was convicted of raping and murdering a ten‑year‑old girl residing in the building where he worked. The trial court sentenced him to death under Section 302 IPC, a decision affirmed by the Gujarat High Court as a "rarest of rare" case. On appeal …

RABINDRA KUMAR PAL @ DARA SINGHversusREPUBLIC OF INDIA

2011 INSC 63Dismissed

The case concerns the 1999 arson and murder of Australian missionary Graham Staines and his two sons by a mob in Orissa. The trial court convicted fourteen accused, sentencing Dara Singh (A‑1) to death and the others to life imprisonment; the High Court modified Dara Singh's sentence to life …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusVISHWESHWAR KOL

2011 INSC 56Appeal(s) allowed

Vishweshwar K. Kol was accused of pouring kerosene on his second wife and four daughters, resulting in their deaths. The eldest daughter, Jyoti, gave a dying declaration to the police after a doctor certified her fitness to testify. The trial court convicted Kol under Section 302 IPC and sentenced …

ALAMELU & ANR.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2011 INSC 55Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 366 and 376 IPC read with Section 109 for alleged abduction, forced marriage and rape of PW‑2, a girl claimed to be a minor. The High Court affirmed the trial court's convictions, but the Supreme Court, exercising its Article 136 jurisdiction, examined …

STATE OF U.P.versusCHHOTEYLAL

2011 INSC 48Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the Allahabad High Court's acquittal of A‑1, who had been convicted by the trial court for kidnapping, wrongful confinement and rape of a minor girl. The girl, aged about 17 years, was abducted from her village, taken to a city, and forced to have sexual …

LAKHAN LALversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2011 INSC 50Case Partly allowed

Lakhan Lal and Pappu Lal were convicted of murder under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. At the time of the offence (9 May 1985) they were about 16 years old, i.e., minors under the age of 18. The Supreme Court examined whether they could be treated as juveniles under the …

VIKAS KUMAR ROORKEWALversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS,

2011 INSC 27Disposed off

The petitioner, son of a murdered Superintending Engineer, filed a transfer petition under Section 406 of the CrPC seeking to move the murder trial from Haridwar to Delhi, alleging that witnesses were being threatened by the accused's powerful gang and that the investigating and prosecuting agencies …

KAMLESHWAR PASWANversusSTATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH

2011 INSC 32Dismissed

Kamleshwar Paswan was convicted for the murder of his two young sons and the attempted murder of a third child after a neighbour witnessed him beating the children with a wooden stick. The trial court sentenced him to death under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, a sentence confirmed by …

DAYA NANDversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2011 INSC 20Disposed off

The appellant Daya Nano was convicted under Sections 376 r.w. and 511 of the IPC for rape and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. He was 16 years, 5 months and 19 days old at the time of the offence, but the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 came into force …

SAJJAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2011 INSC 24Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sajjan Sharma, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Narain Kunwar in an alleged unlawful assembly that fired weapons. The FIR and the original Fard‑e‑beyan named five accused, including the appellant's father and brother, but did not name the appellant himself. He was …

LAXMICHAND @ BALBUTYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 16Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Laxmichand, was involved in a quarrel with the deceased, Gyaniram Mahajan, who was intoxicated and refused to leave the appellant's house. The appellant dragged the deceased outside and struck him on the head with a spade, causing injuries that led to death after seven days. The …

SURENDERA MISHRAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2011 INSC 17Dismissed

Surendra Mishra was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and for illegal possession of a firearm under Section 27 of the Arms Act after he shot dead Chandrashekhar Choubey. He appealed, claiming that he was of unsound mind at the time of the offence and therefore entitled to the protection of …

NARWINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 11Dismissed

The wife of Narwinder Singh, who was pregnant, committed suicide within four years of marriage. The trial court convicted the husband and his parents under Section 304‑B IPC for dowry death, but the High Court, finding no dowry demand at the time of death, converted the husband's conviction to …

M. NAGESHWAR RAOversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2011 INSC 12Appeal(s) allowed

M. Nageshwar Rao was charged with murdering his wife Laxmi Kumari by allegedly mixing cyanide into a Limca bottle and giving it to her. The prosecution relied on a confessional statement, forensic reports indicating cyanide in the victim’s organs and in an empty Limca bottle recovered from the …

MANGESHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 13Disposed off

The appellant, Mangesh, was angry that his sister Sandhya was in a love affair with Prashant, the deceased, and on a night he saw them together he stabbed Prashant three times with a knife. Prashant died three days later. The trial court and the High Court convicted Mangesh under Section 302 of the …

KAILAS & OTHERSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA TR. TALUKA P.S.

2011 INSC 15Dismissed

The case concerns Nandabai, a young Bhil woman who was beaten, stripped and paraded in a village after an illicit relationship with a higher‑caste man. The trial court convicted four accused under IPC sections 452, 354, 323, 506(2) read with 34 and under Section 3 of the SC/ST Act; the High Court …

HIMANSHU @ CHINTUversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2011 INSC 7Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Murari, for which Himanshu @ Chintu (A‑2) and Shesh Bahadur Pandey (A‑3) were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The appellants challenged the conviction on three grounds: (i) the FIR was lodged two hours after the incident, allegedly to …

JAGAT SINGHversusSTATE OF H. P.

2011 INSC 1Case Partly allowed

Jagat Singh (A‑1) and three others were involved in a land‑dispute altercation that escalated into a free fight during which the deceased, Bachittar Singh, was stabbed and later died. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the High Court convicted A‑1 under Sections 302 and 307 IPC read with …

S. GANESANversusRAMA RAGHURAMAN & .ORS

2011 INSC 3Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, father of the deceased G. Arulmozhi, challenged the acquittal of a married couple (Rama Raghuraman and her husband) by the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The trial court had convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 120‑B IPC for murder, based on circumstantial evidence that the …

STATE OF KERALAversusRANEEF

2011 INSC 5Dismissed

The State of Kerala appealed a Kerala High Court order granting bail to Dr. Raneef, a dental surgeon accused of aiding assailants who assaulted a college professor and severed his right palm. The prosecution alleged that Dr. Raneef, a member of the Popular Front of India (PFI), had pre‑arranged to …

ABRARversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2010 INSC 885Dismissed

Advocate A was attacked by four armed men on 3 April 1979; he was shot from behind and later died. The prosecution relied on three dying declarations—one forming the FIR, one recorded under Section 161 CrPC by a Sub‑Inspector, and a third recorded by the Tahsildar after a doctor certified the victim …

SUBHASHversusSLATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 886Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Subhash was convicted under Sections 306 and 498A IPC for the death of his wife Anuradha, who suffered severe burns. The prosecution's case relied primarily on a dying declaration recorded by Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Ravi Malik, which alleged that the victim attempted suicide due to …

HARI SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2010 INSC 887Dismissed

Hari Singh and his brother Mohar Singh, who ran a brick kiln, had a business rivalry with Guiab Singh, the deceased, over nearby kilns. On a moonless night, the brothers entered Guiab Singh's house; Mohar fired a country-made pistol at close range, killing him. The victim's son Prem Pal and two …

SANJAY KUMAR JAINversusSTATE OF DELHI

2010 INSC 890Case Partly allowed

The appellant Sanjay Kumar Jain was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for the death of his wife within fourteen months of marriage, based on circumstantial evidence and a post‑mortem indicating strangulation. The Supreme Court found serious inconsistencies in the prosecution’s version, …

SHER SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 891Disposed off

The case involved a violent attack on a farming family in Haryana, resulting in the death of the husband (Urned Singh) and injuries to his wife and son. The accused were charged under Sections 302, 149, 323 and 148 of the IPC. The High Court reduced the murder conviction to culpable homicide not …

MOHAMMAD MIANversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 894Dismissed

The case involved a long‑standing enmity between Mohammad Mian and the Husain family, which escalated into a gun‑fire incident resulting in the death of Riyasat Husain and grievous injury to his brother Firasat Husain. The trial court acquitted the accused of murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC, …

STATE OF A. P.versusM. SOHAN BABU & ANR.

2010 INSC 874Appeal(s) allowed

The accused entered a residential house at midnight armed with knives, intending to commit robbery. When confronted by the deceased, a scuffle ensued; A2 stabbed the deceased in the abdomen and a witness, while A1 also stabbed the deceased and threatened other occupants. The deceased died on the way …

SAROJ & ORS.versusHET LAL & ORS.

2010 INSC 855Remitted to Lower Court

The legal representatives of the deceased Joginder Singh filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the driver, the vehicle owner and the insurer, alleging that a Tata 207 vehicle owned by the respondent and driven rashly caused Singh's death. The Motor Accident …

JOHN PANDIANversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T. NADU

2010 INSC 846Disposed off

The case concerns the murder of Vivekanandan in Coimbatore, allegedly orchestrated by Venkatraman (A‑1) out of a love rivalry and carried out by hired assassins Kumar (A‑9), Pavunraj (A‑10) and Prince Kumar (A‑11). The trial court convicted all accused under sections 302, 34, 109 and 120B IPC; the …

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIAversusVIMAL KUMAR SURANA AND ANOTHER

2010 INSC 840Appeal(s) allowed

Vimal Kumar Surana, who had passed the Chartered Accountant examination but was not a member of the Institute, impersonated a chartered accountant, prepared audit reports and forged the Institute's seal before tax authorities. The Institute filed a criminal complaint alleging offences under the …

R.S. SUJATHAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 832Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an IAS officer, challenged disciplinary proceedings by filing an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) seeking quash of a charge memo dated 30‑11‑1999, asserting she received it only on 19‑6‑2002 and thus was within the limitation period. The …

CHIRRA SHIVRAJversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2010 INSC 824Dismissed

The deceased, Chirra Shantha, had a strained relationship with her brother‑in‑law, the appellant, who allegedly abused her. On 21 April 1999 she poured kerosene on herself and the appellant threw a lit match, causing severe burns. She later died of septicemia; a dying declaration was recorded by a …

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusTHUMMALA ANJANEYULU

2010 INSC 819Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Thummala Anjaneyulu, who was charged with murdering Bhoomaiah during a village Panchayat after being provoked for allegedly ogling women. The trial court had convicted him under Section 302 IPC, but the High Court set him free, doubting the …

RAM CHANDRA BHAGATversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2010 INSC 810Hearing Adjourned

The appellant, Ram Chandra Bhaghat, was convicted under Section 493 of the Indian Penal Code for deceitfully inducing a belief of lawful marriage and cohabiting with the complainant for nine years, during which they had two children. The appellant argued that no belief of a lawful marriage was …

DATTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 814Dismissed

The appellant was charged under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for raping a girl aged 10‑12 years. The trial court acquitted him due to lack of medical proof, but the High Court set aside the acquittal, finding the victim’s and her mother’s statements credible and interpreting the medical …

GIAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR

2010 INSC 803Matter referred to larger bench

Gian Singh was convicted under IPC Sections 420 (cheating) and 120B (criminal conspiracy). While his appeal was pending, he sought to compound the offences and filed a petition under CrPC Section 482 to quash the FIR, which the High Court dismissed. The Supreme Court examined whether a …

RAJBIR @ RAJU AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 800Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court examined a special leave petition filed by Rajbir (the husband) and his mother, who were convicted for the murder of Rajbir's pregnant wife Sunita under Section 304B of the IPC. The trial court had sentenced Rajbir to life imprisonment, but the Punjab & Haryana High Court reduced …

THATHAMSETTY SURESHversusSTATE OF A.P.

2010 INSC 801Hearing Adjourned

Thathamsetty Suresh was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court seeking relief from the conviction and sentence. The Court examined the post‑mortem report, which showed multiple …

NAHAR SINGH YADAV & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2010 INSC 790Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered an application by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to transfer the trial of the Ghaziabad Provident Fund scam from the Special Judge, CBI, Ghaziabad to a court in Delhi. The case involved alleged fraudulent withdrawals of government funds by former court …

JITENDRA SINGH @ BABBOO SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 795Hearing Adjourned

Jitendra Singh, convicted under IPC sections 304B and 498A for a 1988 incident, filed a petition seeking to raise an additional ground that he was a minor under the Juvenile (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 at the time of the offence. He submitted a school leaving certificate, marks‑sheet …

BHIM @ UTTAM GHOSHversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 774Case Partly allowed

The appellant was convicted under Section 307 of the IPC for an offence committed on 6 March 1983, when he was about 15 years old. After serving part of his sentence, he challenged the conviction on the ground that he should be treated as a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of …

DR. SUNIL KUMAR SAMBHUDAYAL GUPTA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 770Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Neeru Gupta, committed suicide in 1985 and her brother filed a complaint alleging dowry demand and ill‑treatment by her husband and in‑laws. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding no proof of dowry demand or cruelty and noting the deceased suffered from mental illness. The High …

MONICA BEDIversusSTATE OF AP.

2010 INSC 765Disposed off

Monica Bedi and four co‑accused were convicted under the Indian Penal Code (sections 120‑B, 419, 420) and the Prevention of Corruption Act for a conspiracy to obtain a passport in an assumed name. Bedi argued that her conviction violated Article 20(2) of the Constitution because she had already been …

OM PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 766Dismissed

The appellant Om Pal Singh was convicted for the murder of Rishipal Singh under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution established a long-standing enmity, prior attempts on the victim's life, and presented eyewitness testimony of PW‑2 and PW‑3 who described the shooting. A dying declaration recorded by …

PRASANTA KUMAR SARKARversusASHIS CHATTERJEE & ANR.

2010 INSC 752Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, brother of a 57‑year‑old widow who was found strangulated, filed a criminal appeal against the Calcutta High Court's order granting regular bail to the accused under Section 439 of the CrPC. The accused had been arrested, identified by a witness in a second test identification parade, …

VARUN CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2010 INSC 757Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Income Tax Officer was found murdered near his residence. Three accused were arrested; the prosecution relied on a knife recovered from one accused, blood‑stained clothes from another, and the recovery of a motorcycle whose registration number was partially identified. No eye‑witness …

SATYA NARAYANA TIWARI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 749Dismissed

The appellant husband and his mother‑in‑law were accused of dowry death after the bride, aged about 24, was found strangled and burnt in her matrimonial home within three years of marriage. The prosecution proved, on circumstantial evidence, that the accused repeatedly demanded a Maruti car as …

RANJIT SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2010 INSC 747Dismissed

The case involved an alleged unlawful assembly that rioted and assaulted victims, resulting in two deaths and three grievous injuries. The trial court convicted ten accused under sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 365 and 342 IPC, but the High Court acquitted two and upheld convictions of eight; five …

SUDHAKARANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2010 INSC 742Dismissed

The appellant, Sudhakar, was accused of murdering his wife by striking her on the neck with a chopper, an act witnessed by neighbours who saw him carrying the blood‑stained weapon and his infant child. The trial court and the Kerala High Court convicted him under Section 302 IPC, rejecting his claim …

ANJANI CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 738Disposed off

The case involves the murder of Prem Kumar Chaudhary during a family land dispute, where three relatives—Anjani Chaudhary, Bhimsen Chaudhary and Kinkin Chaudhary—were alleged to have attacked the victim with a pistol, lathi, farsa and bhala respectively. The trial court and High Court convicted all …

SANGHARAJ BHOGAPPA KAMBLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 739Dismissed

On 5 November 1988, the deceased, a neighbour, was persuaded by the accused and his friend to join them for drinks. After consuming alcohol, the accused got into a quarrel with his father, slapped him, and was subsequently rebuked by the deceased who intervened. In a sudden fit of anger, the accused …

MOHD. USMAN MOHD. ISLAM SHAIKH & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 741Dismissed

Four members of a family – the husband, his mother and two sisters – were charged with murdering the husband’s wife, who could not bear children. The prosecution relied on three independent eyewitnesses who testified to a prolonged quarrel and the beating of the victim, as well as medical testimony …

STATE OF U.P.versusMUNI RAM & ORS.

2010 INSC 737Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Munni Ram and others for assault, homicide and offences under the Cattle Trespass Act arising from a dispute over trespassing buffaloes. The trial court convicted the accused, but the Allahabad High Court acquitted them after finding the prosecution witnesses …

NANDYALA VENKATARAMANAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2010 INSC 740Dismissed

Bhavani married Nandyala Venkataramana in 1992 and was given a dowry of one lakh rupees, but the husband demanded additional items on the wedding night and continued to harass her for further dowry. Despite a Panchayat order for the couple to live separately, the husband, his parents, and brother …

BRAHM SWAROOP & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 734Dismissed

The case involved six accused who were alleged to have fired on four persons, resulting in four deaths. The trial court acquitted Brahm Swaroop and Jagdish Baggar on the ground that the informant could not name their fathers and the weapon recovery was doubtful, while convicting the others. On …

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusKISHORE SINGH & OTHERS

2010 INSC 732Appeal(s) allowed

The CBI prosecuted three police officers for grievously injuring a detainee, Jugta Ram, in police custody, including the amputation of his penis using a razor. The trial court convicted all three under sections 326, 308, 323, 342, 343 and 120B of the IPC, but the Rajasthan High Court acquitted the …

SUBRATA DASversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

2010 INSC 721Dismissed

A complaint under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was filed against the appellant. The Chief Judicial Magistrate initially dismissed the complaint, finding no case, but the Additional Sessions Judge remanded the matter for a fresh review. On …

RAMESHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 717Dismissed

The case arose from a violent clash over disputed land in Jind, where several accused, armed with pistols, lathis and other weapons, assembled and attacked a group of persons, resulting in the death of Krishan and injuries to others. The trial court convicted the appellants under Sections 302, 307, …

RAMESHBHAI MOHANBHAI KOLI & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2010 INSC 711Dismissed

The appellants were accused of murdering the chairman of a bank, with the prosecution alleging that they were hired by co‑accused to carry out the attack. The trial court convicted the appellants based on a chain of circumstantial evidence, including a blood‑stained loan application, knives …

IRIDIUM INDIA TELECOM LTD.versusMOTOROLA INCORPORATED & ORS.

2010 INSC 713Appeal(s) allowed

Iridium India Telecom Ltd. filed a criminal complaint alleging cheating by Motorola Inc. (respondent No.1) for misleading investors about the Iridium satellite system. The Bombay High Court, invoking Article 227 and Section 482 of the CrPC, quashed the magistrate's process, holding that a …

VITHAL LAXMAN CHALAWADI & ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY P. PROSECUTOR

2010 INSC 707Disposed off

The deceased Ramesh was killed during an altercation with members of the Chalawadi family over a disputed marriage. The trial court convicted two of the six accused for assault, while the High Court later convicted four under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder. On appeal, the Supreme …

SACHIDANAND THAKURversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2010 INSC 706Dismissed

The appellant, an Indian Army soldier, fired three shots at a member of a Quick Reaction Team during a night security duty after a stone‑throwing incident, killing Naik Jityu Yadav at a distance of 8‑10 feet. Despite being warned by a fellow sentry not to fire, he shot the victim and, when …

MANOJ MAHAVIR PRASAD KHAITANversusRAM GOPAL PODDAR AND ANR.

2010 INSC 690Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, brother of the daughter‑in‑law who had filed a dowry harassment case under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act against her father‑in‑law, was accused by the father‑in‑law of stealing two gold bangles during a police raid on the matrimonial home. A complaint was filed, …

ASOKE BASAKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 695Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Asoke Basak, then Chairman of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), was charged in a criminal complaint under Sections 405, 409 read with Section 34 of the IPC for allegedly refusing to refund a Rs 5 lakh security deposit made by Datar Switchgear Ltd. (respondent No.2). The …

LAXMAN RAM MANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 680Dismissed

Vasudha, married to Laxman Ram Mane, drowned in a river about one and a half years after her marriage. The prosecution alleged that the husband, aided by his sisters, harassed her and maintained an illicit relationship with a woman named Pragati, leading to her suicide. The trial court convicted the …

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE THR. CBI

2010 INSC 679Dismissed

The appellant, Santosh Kumar Singh, was accused of raping and murdering Priyadarshini Mattoo. The trial court acquitted him, rejecting the DNA evidence and deeming the circumstantial evidence insufficient. The High Court reversed the acquittal, finding the chain of circumstantial facts – continuous …

THANU RAMversusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 673Dismissed

Thanu Ram's wife, Hirabai, committed suicide by self‑immolation in the fourth year of their marriage while six months pregnant. She made a dying declaration before a Naib Tahsildar, which a doctor affirmed was given in a sound mental state. The prosecution proved that the husband and his mother …

KANWAR NATWAR SINGHversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR

2010 INSC 676Dismissed

Kanwar Natwar Singh and others appealed against the Directorate of Enforcement after a show‑cause notice was issued under Rule 4(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 2000. The appellants demanded that the adjudicating authority furnish copies of all …

BRUNDABAN MOHARANA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF ORISSA

2010 INSC 653Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, the in‑laws of Amani Moharana, were convicted by the trial court for murder based on two dying declarations of the deceased, one recorded by a doctor (PW‑8) and another by a police officer (PW‑9) under Section 161 of the CrPC. The High Court discarded the doctor’s declaration as a …

RAJA GOUNDER & ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2010 INSC 655Dismissed

The appellants, Raja Gounder and others, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of their brother amid a land dispute. The prosecution's case relied on the testimony of the deceased's widow, who was also the sister‑in‑law of the accused, and on medical evidence …

PARAMJEET SINGH @ PAMMAversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2010 INSC 647Dismissed

Paramjeet Singh (Pamma) was convicted for murdering his brother and two nephews and injuring three other family members in a property dispute. The trial court and the Uttarakhand High Court upheld the conviction based on the FIR, statements under Section 161 CrPC, medical reports, forensic evidence …

GANPATversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2010 INSC 649Dismissed

Ganpat, the complainant, appealed against the High Court's order acquitting eleven accused persons charged under IPC sections 148, 149, 302, 323, 324, 325. The trial court had convicted the accused, but the High Court set them free, holding that the complainant was the aggressor and that the …

V.P. SHRIVASTAVAversusINDIAN EXPLOSIVES LTD. & ORS.

2010 INSC 646Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a tripartite agreement between the Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd (FCIL), Indian Explosives Ltd (IEL) and Bharat Coking Coal Ltd (BCCL) for the supply of ammonium nitrate. IEL later filed a criminal complaint alleging that senior FCIL officials (the appellants) and a third …

SANJEETA DASversusTAPAN KUMAR MOHANTY

2010 INSC 632Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by Sanjeeta Das against a decree of divorce granted by the Orissa High Court on the basis of an affidavit in which the husband, Tapan Kumar Mohanty, offered to pay Rs 10 lakh as maintenance. The husband had earlier filed a petition under Sections 13(1)(ia) and …

PAL @ PALLAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2010 INSC 634Disposed off

The appellant lodged an FIR alleging murder and later filed a protest petition that was treated as a complaint, leading to two parallel criminal proceedings: one based on a police charge‑sheet and another on the complaint. The accused in the police case were the witnesses in the complaint case and …

RANJEET SINGH @ DARAversusSTATE OF MADHYA.PRADESH

2010 INSC 625Dismissed

The appellant, Ranjit Singh, was found in a locked room with a blood‑stained sword after the step‑mother was discovered dead with incised wounds. The trial and High Courts convicted him under Section 302 IPC based on oral, medical and documentary circumstantial evidence, rejecting his claim that he …

SUNDER SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL

2010 INSC 621Dismissed

The appellant Sunder Singh was convicted for the murder of six members of his cousin's family by setting their house on fire with petrol, closing the door, and slashing one victim with a sword. The prosecution relied on the surviving victim's eyewitness testimony, the dying declarations of two …

SURENDRA PAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2010 INSC 622Dismissed

The appellants, who had earlier demanded a compromise in a kidnapping case, allegedly opened fire with country‑made pistols and a rifle, killing three members of the victim's family and injuring three others. The first informant, PW‑1, lodged an FIR within five hours of the incident and identified …

SRI SAMBHU DAS @ BIJOY DAS & ANR.versusSTATE OF ASSAM

2010 INSC 613Dismissed

The appellants were convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's wife, corroborated by the investigating officer and a post‑mortem report. They challenged the conviction on several grounds, including that the FIR was lodged after the …

M/S COAL INDIA LIMITED & ORS.versusCOAL CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.

2010 INSC 615Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) could suspend coal supplies to 45 industrial consumers under a Fuel Supply Agreement (FSA) when no FIR had been filed against those consumers. The Court noted that Clause 4.4 of the FSA and the 2007 New Coal Distribution Policy …

SURENDERA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2010 INSC 616Case Allowed

Surendra Pratap Singh filed an FIR alleging that his brother was murdered by four persons, including MLA Brijesh Mishra. While three accused were arrested, the MLA evaded arrest and later secured a transfer of the investigation to the CBI, after which the Uttar Pradesh government withdrew eight …

M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED AND ORS.versusALOK FUELS (P) LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR

2010 INSC 612Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, Alok Fuels Ltd. and others, were supplied coal by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (BCCL) under a Fuel Supply Agreement (FSA) that required the coal to be used only in their plants. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) lodged an FIR alleging that the respondents were diverting the …

RAMA DEVIversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

2010 INSC 610Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rama Devi, was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 465, 468 and 120‑B for allegedly conspiring with her vendor to sell a plot of land to the complainant despite knowing it had been previously transferred. The trial magistrate took cognizance of the complaint, and the appellant sought …

ABDUL SAYEEDversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2010 INSC 608Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Chand Khan and his son Shabir Khan, for which five appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The appellants challenged the conviction on grounds that no charge under Section 34 was framed, that the injuries could not be …

SANGAPPA SANGANABASAPPA M. & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2010 INSC 605Dismissed

The case involved a double murder where the deceased Irappa and his brother Kenchappa were killed after confronting Sangappa (A‑1) over an earlier assault on their son. The trial court acquitted all seven accused, but the Karnataka High Court convicted three of them (A‑1, A‑2, A‑4) under section 302 …

SUNITA JHAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2010 INSC 606Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sunita Jha, was charged under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code for cruelty to the complainant, Asha Rani Pal, on the ground that she was living with Pal's husband as his wife. The trial court rejected her discharge application, and the Jharkhand High Court affirmed that her …

ABU SALEM ABDUL QAYOOM ANSARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2010 INSC 602Dismissed

Abu Salem, an absconding accused in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts, was arrested in Portugal and extradited to India under the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings and the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 (applied to Portugal by a 2002 notification). Portugal granted …

UMA SHANKAR SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2010 INSC 591Dismissed

During a Bihar assembly election, an FIR was lodged for murder, robbery and illegal possession of arms, implicating Uma Shankar Singh. The investigation was transferred to the CID and both the CID and local police submitted final reports under Section 173(2) CrPC that exonerated Singh. Despite these …

RAM NARESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 595Dismissed

In 1978, appellant Ram Naresh shot at Ram Vilas, injuring him; the FIR was lodged the next morning at a police station 9 km away. The trial court and the Allahabad High Court convicted the appellant under Section 307 IPC and sentenced him to five years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the Supreme …

M/S. KRANTI ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusSH. MASOOD AHMED KHAN & OTHERS

2010 INSC 582Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard two separate appeals filed by a builder (Kranti Associates) and Corporation Bank against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (National Commission) that dismissed their revision petitions without providing adequate reasons. The Court examined whether …

MANJAPPA & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 583Dismissed

The appellants were charged with kidnapping a 13‑year‑old girl, taking her to Bombay, and selling her for prostitution, violating IPC sections 366A, 372, 373 read with section 34. The trial court convicted two of the accused and acquitted the third; the State appealed, leading the Karnataka High …

MAIN PALversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 577Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was charged with trespassing into Prakashi Devi's house and assaulting her with intent to outrage her modesty under IPC sections 452 and 354. Evidence showed that the assault was actually on Prakashi Devi's daughter‑in‑law, Sheela Devi, and not on Prakashi Devi. The trial court …

SANTOKH SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 567Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Sanjay Kumar, a union leader, who was shot with his own licensed pistol after being taken to a hotel by four accused Union members. The trial court convicted all four under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, but the High Court upheld the conviction of only …

MYLADIMMAL SURENDRAN & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2010 INSC 568Dismissed

The case involves the murder of a BJP leader in Kerala, allegedly carried out by workers of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) as part of a political rivalry. The victim's wife, along with two other eyewitnesses, identified the assailants, and a dying declaration of the victim corroborated their …

C. MUNIAPPAN & ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2010 INSC 553Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of thirty‑one accused arising from a "Rasta Roko" agitation during which a university bus carrying 47 female students was set ablaze, killing three girls and injuring many others. The Court upheld the death sentences of the three principal accused (Nedu, …

JYOTI MISHRAversusDHANANJAYA MISHRA

2010 INSC 543Dismissed

Jyoti Mishra, the estranged wife of Dhananjaya Mishra, filed an FIR under Section 498-A of the IPC against her husband and five others in Hyderabad. The case was pending before the 5th Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad. After moving to Indore, she filed transfer petitions (Criminal Nos. 94‑95 of …

PRATHAP & ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2010 INSC 545Dismissed

The deceased Kochukuttan and his companion attacked the appellants, prompting the appellants and nine others to retaliate with swords and other deadly weapons, causing fatal injuries to Kochukuttan. Eye‑witnesses PW‑1 (the brother‑in‑law of the deceased) and PW‑2 positively identified the appellants …

SHAIKH SATTARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 546Dismissed

The appellant, Shaikh Sattar, was convicted under Sections 302 and 498A IPC for murdering his wife, who was found dead with head injuries and a heavy stone nearby. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the husband's demand for money, prior abuse, the location of the body and …

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusM.NARASIMHA RAO

2010 INSC 548Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed the High Court's acquittal of M. Narasimha Rao, who was charged with murder under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution relied on the eyewitness testimony of the victim's son (PW‑1) and wife (PW‑2), corroborated by a detailed post‑mortem report showing multiple fatal …

BABUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ETC.

2010 INSC 541Disposed off

Two FIRs (CR No.1‑154/2008 and CR No.1‑155/2008) were lodged for communal clashes in Dhedhal village. The High Court quashed the second FIR, merged the investigations, and transferred the case to the State CID, also directing that the charge‑sheet of the quashed FIR be read into the surviving case. …

STATE OF ORISSAversusCHOUDHURI NAYAK (DEAD BY LR) & ORS.

2010 INSC 539Appeal(s) allowed

The first respondent, Chaudhuri Nayak, obtained a Freedom Fighters' Pension under the 1972 scheme by claiming imprisonment in 1943, supported by a typed jail certificate and a certified extract of a challan register. A public interest litigation alleged that the documents were fabricated and that …

RAJESHWAR TIWARI AND ORS.versusNANDA KISHORE ROY

2010 INSC 532Appeal(s) allowed

The employee, Nanda Kishore Roy, complained that his employer had wrongfully deducted Rs.1,640 per month as income tax and failed to deposit it, leading a magistrate to issue summons under sections 406/1208 IPC. The employer argued that the deductions were mandated by the Income Tax Act and that the …

G. PARSHWANATHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 525Dismissed

The appellant, G. Parshwanath, was convicted for the murder of his wife and minor son and for causing the disappearance of evidence under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC. The prosecution's case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence, including the victims' residence in the appellant's house, a …

SHIVANNAversusSTATE BY HUNSUR TOWN POLICE

2010 INSC 526Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a truck driver, was charged with causing death and injuries when his stone‑laden truck overturned on a state highway, leading to convictions under IPC sections 304‑A, 279, 337 and 338. The prosecution relied primarily on the testimony of three injured witnesses who were in the …

STATE NCT OF DELHIversusAJIT SETH @ AJJI

2010 INSC 520Dismissed

The appellant Ajit Seth was convicted for the brutal burning to death of two children, aged three and seven, and sentenced to death under IPC 302 and to ten years' rigorous imprisonment under IPC 364. The High Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, directing that the appellant not …

MADAN MOHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

2010 INSC 521Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior officer, was prosecuted under IPC sections 306 (abetment of suicide) and 294(b) based on a FIR alleging that he harassed a driver who later was found dead, allegedly leaving a suicide note blaming the appellant. The Supreme Court examined the authenticity of the note and the …

CHAKALI MADDILETY & ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2010 INSC 517Dismissed

The deceased Harijana Ayyanna was attacked and stabbed by a group of accused (A1‑A7) who were armed with daggers and a stick. The FIR was lodged promptly and named all the accused. Eye‑witnesses, the deceased's son (PW‑1) and wife (PW‑2), testified that the accused surrounded and stabbed the victim, …

VIRENDER PRASAD SINGHversusRAJESH BHARDWAJ & ORS.

2010 INSC 518Appeal(s) allowed

Virender Prasad Singh filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking re‑investigation of offences (IPC ss. 302, 201, 120‑B) alleged against Rajesh Bhardwaj after a charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Patna High Court, instead of examining the charge‑sheet, directed that a Director …

STATE OF M.P.versusHARISHANKAR BHAGWAN PD. TRIPATHI

2010 INSC 510Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted two individuals under Section 161 IPC and Sections 5(1)(d) and 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 for demanding illegal gratification in connection with an excise licence. A trap was arranged in which the complainant handed over treated currency …

PREETI GUPTA & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANOTHER

2010 INSC 512Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant filed a criminal complaint under sections 498‑A, 406, 341, 323 and 120‑B IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against her husband and his immediate relatives, including the married sister‑in‑law (Preeti Gupta) and the unmarried brother‑in‑law (Gaurav Poddar). The …

KISHAN SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS.versusGURPAL SINGH & ORS.

2010 INSC 509Disposed off

The dispute arose from two agreements to sell the same parcel of land, leading to parallel civil suits for specific performance. The appellant's father, after losing the civil suit, filed an FIR alleging forgery of the earlier agreement and the respondents obtained a quashing order from the High …

AMIT KUMAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 504Dismissed

The appellants Amit Kumar and Brij Bhushan were convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for the murder of Anita Rani, who was set on fire allegedly over dowry demands. The prosecution relied on the victim's dying declaration recorded by a Judicial Magistrate, corroborated by eyewitnesses who …

S.S. CHHEENAversusVIJAY KUMAR MAHAJAN & ANOTHER

2010 INSC 506Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, S.S. Chheena, a university security officer, was charged under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abetting the suicide of a student, Saurav Mahajan, who had taken his life after a dispute over a stolen mobile phone. The suicide note recovered from the deceased blamed …

M.A.A. ANNAMALAIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER

2010 INSC 507Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former director of R.P.S. Benefit Fund Ltd., filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash criminal proceedings initiated under Section 420 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Prize, Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The FIR alleged cheating by the …

JABAR SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 508Appeal(s) allowed

Jabar Singh shot Sarnam Singh on 13 November 1984, inflicting a wound that was not fatal. The victim died fourteen days later from peritonitis, which the medical experts attributed to inadequate medical care rather than the gunshot injury. The trial court acquitted the accused due to identification …

BABUversusSTATE OF KERALA

2010 INSC 495Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Babu was charged under IPC s.302 for allegedly murdering his wife by giving her sodium cyanide disguised as an ayurvedic contraceptive. The trial court acquitted him due to lack of direct evidence and doubts about the prosecution's version, but the Kerala High Court reversed the …

VIKAS CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

2010 INSC 496Dismissed

The accused Vikas Chaudhary and co‑accused abducted a young man, killed him and thereafter made repeated ransom calls to the victim's parents. The petitioner argued that the offence under IPC s.364A was completed at the time of abduction and that he was a juvenile when the offence was committed, …

RAKESH CHAND & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 503Appeal(s) allowed

Neelam Kumari married Anil Kumar in 1998 and later demanded additional dowry amounts, first Rs.20,000 in 2000 and subsequently Rs.50,000 in 2003. The latter demand was made solely by the husband shortly before Neelam's death, and the parents‑in‑law (Rakesh Chand and Pushpa Devi) were accused of …

LAKHANversusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 489Dismissed

The appellant, Lakhan, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly burning his wife, Savita. Two dying declarations were recorded: the first by an Executive Magistrate stating the death was accidental, and the second by a police ASI accusing the appellant of pouring kerosene and setting her …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2010 INSC 490Dismissed

The appellant Virendra Singh, along with his father Hakim Singh and brother Kamlesh, went armed to the house of Bhagirath to force him to reap their crop. When Bhagirath refused, the father and Virendra beat his son Baburam, and on the father's exhortation Kamlesh shot Bhagirath, causing his death. …

ATBIRversusGOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

2010 INSC 491Dismissed

The appellants Atbir and Ashok were convicted for the murder of three members of their step‑mother's family, based solely on the dying declaration of the surviving victim, Sonu (Savita), recorded by a police officer in the presence of a doctor. The Supreme Court held that the declaration was …

DEBASHIS DAW & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 479Disposed off

The appellants were convicted for forming an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons, assaulting a victim who later died, and injuring another person. The trial court and High Court upheld the convictions under Sections 148, 149, 324 and 304 IPC based on eyewitness testimony of the victim, his …

STATE OF U.P.versusSIYA RAM & ANR.

2010 INSC 482Case Partly allowed

The case concerned three accused charged with an offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court acquitted one accused and convicted the other two. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court acquitted Siyaram on the ground that his shot did not cause injury and …

JAYANTA SILversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2010 INSC 475Dismissed

The appellant, Jayanta Sil, was alleged to have murdered Kandarpa with a sharp cutting weapon while returning from a feast. The prosecution relied on the testimony of six eyewitnesses, including the deceased's wife (PW1) and two other eye‑witnesses (PW5, PW6), as well as corroborative statements …

MUKESHBHAI GOPALBHAI BAROTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2010 INSC 477Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a lawyer, was charged with murdering a married Scheduled Caste mid‑wife by setting her on fire after an alleged attempted rape. Three dying declarations were recorded: two (to a magistrate and to police) stated the burns were accidental, while a third (by the husband) alleged …