Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 14401–14600

AMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2010 INSC 468Disposed off

Amar Singh was convicted under Sections 498A and 3048 IPC for the dowry death of his wife, who died in a fire within ten months of marriage. The prosecution proved that the husband had repeatedly taunted the wife for not providing a scooter or Rs.25,000, establishing harassment in connection with a …

BHIARU RAM AND ORS.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.

2010 INSC 470Dismissed

The petitioners, accused in a CBI case under the Prevention of Corruption Act for abetting the possession of disproportionate assets by a senior income‑tax officer, filed a transfer petition under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to move the trial from the Special Court, CBI, …

STATE OF U.P.versusKRISHNA MASTER & ORS.

2010 INSC 471Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the Allahabad High Court’s acquittal of Krishna Master and two others for the homicide of six persons. The trial court had convicted them under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and imposed death sentences, which the High Court set aside. The Supreme Court …

HARI SINGHversusSTATE OF M. P.

2010 INSC 473Dismissed

Hari Singh was convicted for the murder of Ashok Kumar on 22 May 1989, based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses who saw the shooting at a village well. The FIR was lodged within two hours of the incident. The appellant challenged the conviction on grounds of the long lapse (8‑9 years) before the …

RAVINDRA TUKARAM HIWALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 463Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ravindra Tukaram Hiwale, was convicted for abetment of suicide under IPC s.306 and cruelty under s.498‑A after his wife Alka died by self‑immolation following a domestic quarrel. The trial court sentenced him to four years for s.306 and one year for s.498‑A. The State appealed, and …

RAMGOPAL & ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P. & ANR.

2010 INSC 458Hearing Adjourned

The petitioners, convicted under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, sought relief on the ground that they had reached an amicable settlement with the victims. The Court examined whether such a settlement could lead to their acquittal despite the offence being …

S. ARUL RAJAversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2010 INSC 459Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Arul Raja, was accused of murdering Aladi Aruna and of conspiring with co‑accused to commit the crime. The High Court convicted him on the basis of a post‑arrest statement by co‑accused A1, treating it as a dying declaration and a confession, and on alleged motive stemming from a …

DASRATHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 455Dismissed

The appellant Dasrath was convicted under Section 3048 IPC for dowry death and Section 201 IPC for concealing the death of his wife Pinki, who died from burns after kerosene was allegedly poured on her. The prosecution proved that the death was unnatural, occurred within seven years of marriage, and …

RAM NIWASversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 440Dismissed

Ram Niwas and four others were tried for the murder of Sher Singh and the attempted murder of Chanda. The trial court convicted Ram Niwas under Sections 302 and 307 of the IPC, acquitting the remaining accused and giving benefit of doubt to two of them. On appeal, the appellant argued that the …

MAYANDIversusSTATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE

2010 INSC 442Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a kitchen employee of a hotel, attacked the managing director with a concealed sickle, inflicting multiple injuries. The victim, a known heart patient who had undergone angioplasty, died the following day; medical evidence attributed death to myocardial infarction and not to the …

BIRAPPA & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 445Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved three accused—Birappa (A‑1), Kareppa (A‑2) and Muttappa (A‑3)—charged with the murder of Gulappa. The trial court convicted Birappa based primarily on the testimony of a single eyewitness, PW‑1, the brother of the deceased, while acquitting the other two. On appeal, the High Court …

BEERE GOWDAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 446Dismissed

The appellant, Beere Gowda, was charged with murdering his two‑and‑a‑half‑year‑old daughter Pallavi by forcibly administering a mixture of nitric and sulphuric acid, obtained from a goldsmith, while his second wife Indramma was a co‑accused. The Sessions Court acquitted both, holding that the child …

DEO NARAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 447Appeal(s) allowed

Six persons were tried and convicted for the double murder of Ram Swarup and Ram Pratap Singh under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC. While the appeal was pending, four of the accused died, and the High Court dismissed the appeal of the two survivors, Shiv Singh and Deo Narain. Deo …

SATPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 448Dismissed

Satpal Singh was convicted of rape under Section 376 IPC for assaulting the minor Rajinder Kaur. He appealed, arguing that the FIR was lodged after an inordinate four‑month delay, that the victim was a major, and that the act was consensual because they were schoolmates. The Supreme Court held that …

ARUMUGAMversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2010 INSC 450Dismissed

The appellant, Arumugam, murdered his step‑mother Saroja by strangling her with a rope. He made an extra‑judicial confession first to his step‑sister and shortly thereafter to the Village Administrative Officer, who recorded the statement and handed him over to police. The rope was recovered, and …

LOUIS PETER SURINversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2010 INSC 434Appeal(s) allowed

An FIR was lodged in April 1984 under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Indian Penal Code alleging that the appellant, then Managing Director of a district agency, conspired with a Deputy Commissioner to award a contract to a private firm. The State Government denied sanction for prosecution …

SIDDANKI RAM REDDYversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2010 INSC 435Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted for murder (s.302 IPC) after a mob attacked the deceased in a court corridor, based primarily on the testimony of three eye‑witnesses (PW‑1, PW‑5, PW‑6) and a test identification parade. The Supreme Court examined the reliability of those witnesses, noting that PW‑1 …

VIJAY @ CHINEEversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2010 INSC 437Dismissed

The appellant Vijay and five others were convicted of gang‑rape of a girl, Asha @ Gopi, on 6‑12‑1988 under IPC s.376/34 and sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment. The appellant appealed, contending that the victim was a major, that there was no consent, that the prosecution relied solely on …

PRITHIversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 438Dismissed

The appellant, accused of murder and related offences, challenged his conviction on the ground that the victim's dead body was never recovered and no post‑mortem was conducted, arguing that proof of corpus delicti was lacking. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses, PW‑6 (who was injured) and …

BIPIN KUMAR MONDALversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 430Dismissed

Bipin Kumar Mondal was convicted for the murder of his wife and son and for causing hurt to another son under IPC sections 302 and 323. The prosecution’s case rested on the eyewitness testimony of the surviving son, Sujit Mondal, who lodged an Ejahar stating that his father attacked the family with …

NATIONAL COMMISSION OF WOMENversusSTATE OF DELHI & ANR.

2010 INSC 423Dismissed

The case arose from the suicide of a 21‑year‑old woman, Sunita, who alleged that the accused, Amit, had exploited her sexually after promising marriage and threatening to expose her. The trial court convicted Amit under IPC s.306 (abetment of suicide) and s.376 (rape), sentencing him to life …

PODYAMI SUKADAversusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATISGARH)

2010 INSC 425Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused of killing his mother with a burnt wooden stick. The prosecution relied on an alleged extra‑judicial confession made by the appellant before a village Panchayat, witnessed by four persons, and on the recovery of the alleged weapon at the appellant's request. The trial court …

DHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 419Case Partly allowed

The appellant Ohan Singh was convicted for the death of his brother Shiv Ram, who died after being struck on the head with an iron rod during a family property dispute. The prosecution relied on Shiv Ram's dying declaration, recorded by a Head Constable after a doctor certified that he was fit to …

MANNU SAOversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 420Dismissed

Mannu Sao was convicted under IPC sections 302 and 201 for murdering his wife, Bimla Devi, whose body was found burnt. He claimed she had committed suicide by self‑immolation, but the post‑mortem showed death by throttling before the burns. The trial and High Courts upheld the conviction based on a …

NARINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR

2010 INSC 414Dismissed

Narinder Kumar was charged with murdering Kola Ram after a heated exchange during a Baisakhi procession, where he allegedly returned with a 12‑bore gun and shot the victim. The prosecution relied on consistent testimony of four eye‑witnesses, corroborated by medical and forensic evidence linking the …

AUTOMOBILE PRODUCTS INDIA LTD.versusDAS JOHN PETER & ORS.

2010 INSC 412Appeal(s) allowed

Automobile Products India Ltd filed a criminal complaint under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 against its former caretaker, Das John Peter, for refusing to vacate a servant quarter after retirement and for allowing his daughter to occupy it. The company filed the complaint through its …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusSANGHARAJ DAMODAR RUPAWATE & ORS.

2010 INSC 395Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra issued a notification under s.95 CrPC ordering the forfeiture of every copy of the book "Shivaji – Hindu King in Islamic India" on the basis of an FIR alleging offences under s.153, s.153A and s.34 IPC. The High Court quashed the notification, holding it failed to state the …

SIKANDAR SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 397Dismissed

The case involved eight persons accused of murdering Upendra Singh and attempting to murder his brother over a disputed land. The prosecution proved that a group of more than five armed men formed an unlawful assembly with the common object of eliminating the victims, and that Rajeshwar Singh fired …

MAQBOOL @ ZUBIR @ SHAHNAWAZ AND ANR.versusSTATE OF AP.

2010 INSC 375Dismissed

The appellants Maqbool, Zubir and Shahnawaz were convicted for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and conspiracy (Sec. 120B IPC) based on eyewitness testimony, medical evidence and entries from a diary recovered during investigation. They challenged the convictions alleging that the witnesses were interested, …

SANATAN NASKAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 376Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Phool Guha and robbery of her house, for which Sanatan Naskar and another accused were arrested after they allegedly led police to stolen wrist watches and a camera. The trial court and the High Court convicted them under Sections 302, 34, 392 and 411 IPC, relying on …

UDAY CHAKRABORTY & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 377Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Uday Chakraborty and his relatives for dowry death under Sec. 304B IPC read with Sec. 498A IPC. Although the FIR did not explicitly mention a dowry demand, the Court held that the cumulative documentary and oral evidence, including the execution of a …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 379Case Partly allowed

Ashok Kumar was convicted under Section 304‑8 IPC for the death of his wife, who died from burn injuries allegedly after being harassed for a dowry demand of Rs.5,000. The appellant argued that the alleged demand did not constitute "dowry" within the meaning of Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act …

VIJETA GAJRAversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2010 INSC 380Disposed off

The complainant filed an FIR alleging dowry demands, criminal breach of trust and illicit relations against Vijeta Gajra under Sections 498A and 406 of the IPC. Gajra sought to quash the FIR via a petition under Article 226 and Section 482 of the CrPC, arguing she was not a "relative" of the …

DHARNIDHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 382Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for the murders of Bahadur Singh and his father Pyare Lal. The prosecution proved that four accused, armed with guns and a spear, killed Bahadur Singh, after which all five accused, including Dharnidhar, proceeded to kill Pyare Lal with guns and a kulhari. The defence …

PRAVINBHAI KASHIRAMBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2010 INSC 383Dismissed

The petitioner, Pravinbhai Kashirambhai Patel, complained of a mob assault and theft on 11 September 2008, filing three separate police complaints that contained differing versions of the incident. Respondents No.2 and No.3 obtained anticipatory bail from an Additional Sessions Judge, which the …

SHIVJEE SINGHversusNAGENDRA TIWARY AND ORS.

2010 INSC 355Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Shivjee Singh filed a protest petition that was converted into a complaint alleging that four persons killed his son. The Judicial Magistrate, after examining the appellant and only two of the four witnesses he named, took cognizance of offences under Sections 302, 1208 IPC and Section …

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusM/S. ASIAN GLOBAL LTD. & ORS.

2010 INSC 356Dismissed

The Central Bank of India sued Asian Global Ltd., its sister concern, and several directors for offences under Sections 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that a cheque issued as a corporate guarantee was dishonoured. The trial court held the bank to be a holder in due course …

SINGAPAGU ANJAIAHversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2010 INSC 357Dismissed

Eight persons, including the appellant Singapagu Anjaiah, were tried for rioting, attempt to commit murder, murder and causing hurt. The appellant allegedly struck the deceased, S. Ramalingam, on the head with a crow bar, causing multiple skull fractures and death, as corroborated by five …

CHUNNI LALversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 346Dismissed

Chunni Lal was convicted of murdering his uncle Heera Lal by firing a gun, and the Supreme Court upheld the life sentence. The appellant argued there was no motive, that only interested witnesses were examined, and that the delay in lodging the FIR and commencing investigation tainted the case. The …

NANHAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 343Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Nanhar and others were convicted for the murder of Vijay under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC, primarily on the basis of a note recovered from the deceased's pocket that the trial court treated as a dying declaration, and on circumstantial evidence. The Supreme Court held that the …

DURGA PRASAD AND ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 323Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the conviction of Durga Prasad and others under IPC sections 498-A and 304-B for the alleged dowry death of Kripa Bai, who committed suicide within seven years of marriage. The trial and High Courts had relied solely on the testimony of the victim's mother and brother, …

NIRANJAN PANJAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 324Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Niranjan Panja was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Haripada Samanta based largely on circumstantial evidence, including the alleged discovery of a blood‑stained weapon that was never produced in court and the claim that the victim was last seen with the accused. The …

JEFFREY J. DIERMEIER AND ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.

2010 INSC 325Appeal(s) allowed

The CFA Institute and its representative issued a public notice titled "A Word of Caution" warning prospective students about the use of the CFA trademark by the Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts of India (ICFAI) after an interim injunction was granted against ICFAI. ICFAI filed a private …

ADALAT PANDIT & ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 327Disposed off

The case arose from a violent dispute over a mango orchard where eleven accused formed an unlawful assembly and attacked the complainant and his two sons, resulting in their deaths. The trial court and High Court convicted all accused under sections 147, 148, 302, 149 IPC and section 27 of the Arms …

ARUN RAJversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 320Dismissed

The appellant, an army signalman, stabbed a fellow soldier to death with a concealed kitchen knife after alleging verbal abuse. He was tried by a General Court Martial under Section 302 IPC read with Section 69 of the Army Act, convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment and dismissal …

PURAN CHANDversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 321Dismissed

Santosh, a married woman, died from severe burns after allegedly being set alight with kerosene by her husband, brother‑in‑law (Puran Chand) and aunt‑in‑law. A dying declaration was recorded by a First Class Judicial Magistrate after a doctor certified her mental fitness. The trial court convicted …

S.P. GUPTAversusASHUTOSH GUPTA

2010 INSC 322Dismissed

A criminal complaint under Section 420 read with Section 120‑B IPC was filed by the father of the respondent alleging that the petitioner, S.P. Gupta, as the attorney of accused No.1, misrepresented the ownership of a property, assuring it was free of encumbrances and that accused No.1 was the sole …

GOPAL SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 315Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were charged with murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, alleged to have killed two men during a land‑dispute. The trial court acquitted them, finding the FIR was delayed, the oral dying declarations unreliable, and the sole eye‑witness's testimony unnatural. The …

K.A. ABBASversusSABU JOSEPH & ANR.

2010 INSC 310Disposed off

K.A. Abbas was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque and was sentenced to one year imprisonment with a direction to pay Rs 5 lakhs compensation to the complainant under Section 357(3) of the CrPC, with a default imprisonment of two months for …

GOVINDAPPA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 312Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of three accused (A-1, A-2 and A-4) for cruelty to a woman under IPC s.498‑A read with s.34 and murder under s.302 read with s.34. The deceased, Renuka, was burned after the accused poured kerosene on her and set her alight. Her dying declaration was recorded …

BALRAJE @ TRIMBAKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 302Dismissed

Balraje (appellant) was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for inflicting a knife blow to the chest of Kailas, resulting in his death. The prosecution relied on eye‑witness testimony of the deceased's son (PW‑1), wife (PW‑2) and a neighbour (PW‑4), who identified Balraje as the assailant. The …

MONIRUDDIN AHMED @ LALU DEALER & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 303Dismissed

On 21 October 1982, the appellants, armed with spears, axes and bombs, attacked an informant and his associates, chasing them through paddy fields. Eye‑witnesses PW7, PW8, PW9 and PW12 testified that the appellants threw bombs and that appellant No.1 (Moniruddin Ahmed @ Lalu Dealer) struck the …

UTPAL DAS & ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 294Dismissed

The victim, a married woman with two children, was intercepted while traveling by rickshaw, taken to a house under construction and forcibly raped by the two appellants, Utpal Das and Haradhan Sutradar. She was later rescued, identified the accused, and lodged an FIR. The trial court acquitted the …

EKNATH GANPAT AHER AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 298Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a land dispute over Gat No. 170 in Maharashtra, where a mob of 75‑100 persons clashed with the complainant party, resulting in two deaths and injuries to members of both sides. The trial court convicted 35 accused under various IPC provisions including murder (s.302) committed by …

DEVENDER KUMAR & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.

2010 INSC 273Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were arrested in a dowry‑related case under IPC sections 498‑A, 406, 506, 323 and 34 and produced before a magistrate. Their first application for police remand was dismissed and they were placed in judicial custody, after which they were granted bail. The investigating officer later …

MUNNAWAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. ETC.

2010 INSC 274Dismissed

The victim, Fateh Mohammad, was shot by the accused and died five days later from septicemia. Two dying declarations were recorded—one by a police officer and another by an Executive Magistrate, both endorsed by a doctor who certified the victim's lucidity. The trial court convicted the accused …

KRISHNA KUMAR VARIARversusSHARE SHOPPE

2010 INSC 263Appeal(s) allowed

Krishna Kumar Variar, accused under Sections 415 and 420 IPC, was summoned by a Delhi court. He contended that only a Bombay court had jurisdiction and filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC in the Delhi High Court, which dismissed his challenge. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that an …

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusHOPESON NINGSHEN & ORS.

2010 INSC 259Disposed off

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) sought transfer of two kidnapping‑murder cases involving an NSCN (IM) activist from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Ukhrul, Manipur to a CBI‑court in Delhi under Section 406 of the CrPC. The incidents involved the abduction and killing of three …

C. MAGESH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 256Disposed off

The case arose from a labour dispute at BPL Engineering Ltd., where a bus carrying loyal employees was attacked, set on fire and several persons were injured and two women died. A charge sheet was filed against 49 accused; the trial court convicted seven of them. The High Court upheld those …

DILPESH BALCHANDRA PANCHALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2010 INSC 253Dismissed

The appellant, Dilpesh Balchandra Panchal, was convicted along with two co‑accused for the murder of Indrasinh under IPC s.302 and s.114. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the victim's parents, who witnessed the attack, medical evidence indicating two fatal knife wounds, and the recovery of …

AMARJIT SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 254Appeal(s) allowed

Amarjit Singh and co‑accused were convicted by a trial court for offences under Sections 306 and 498A of the IPC, read with Section 34, and sentenced to imprisonment. They appealed to the Punjab & Haryana High Court, where the single judge dismissed the appeal, stating there was no reason to …

BAIJ NATH SAHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 255Appeal(s) allowed

Four accused, including Baij Nath Sah, were tried for kidnapping a minor under Sec. 366-A IPC. The trial court convicted them, and the High Court reduced the charge to Sec. 363 and lessened the sentence. On special leave, the Supreme Court examined the sole evidence against Baij Nath Sah—a statement …

S. KHUSHBOOversusKANNIAMMAL AND ANR.

2010 INSC 247Appeal(s) allowed

The actress S. Khushboo made remarks in a 2005 news‑magazine survey endorsing societal acceptance of premarital sex and live‑in relationships. Several members of the PMK political party filed criminal complaints alleging defamation, obscenity, indecent representation of women and incitement under …

VIJENDER KUMAR @ VIJAYversusSTATE OF DELHI

2010 INSC 250Dismissed

Vijender Kumar, son of a bus operator, suspected his helper Yogesh of stealing part of the bus fare. After a personal search recovered Rs 100, Kumar became angry, beat Yogesh and then retrieved a knife from a nearby scooter to stab him in the abdomen, causing Yogesh's death. He was convicted under …

MOHAN MALI & ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 251Disposed off

Mohan Mali and another were convicted under IPC sections 302, 324 and 326 and sentenced to life imprisonment. One co‑accused, Dhanna Lal (appellant No.2), claimed he was a juvenile at the time of the offence. The Supreme Court examined the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of …

SANTOSH MOOLYA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 241Dismissed

The appellants, Santosh Moolya and another, were convicted for raping two sisters who were working in a quarry and were subsequently threatened not to report the crime. The victims lodged a police complaint 42 days after the incident, citing illiteracy, fear of retaliation, and lack of male family …

DHARAMBIRversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.

2010 INSC 238Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Dharmabir, was convicted of murder and attempted murder committed in August 1991 when he was 16 years, 9 months old. At the time of the offences the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 did not deem him a juvenile, but the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, which …

DAYA KISHANversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 234Case Partly allowed

The case arose from a violent incident in which the nephew of a first informant, Rajesh, was shot dead and others injured after a dispute over goods. The appellant, Daya Kishan, was convicted under Sections 302, 307, 323 and 148 read with Section 149 of the IPC, the first conviction being based on …

SHAUKATversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL

2010 INSC 235Disposed off

The appellant Shaukat and his father Sabbir were charged with killing Wilayat and injuring Rahmat over a dispute about digging earth from a village pond. The trial court convicted Shaukat under Sections 302 and 307 IPC; the High Court reduced the conviction to Section 304(Part I) and 308 IPC, …

SIDHARTHA VASHISHT @ MANU SHARMAversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2010 INSC 219Dismissed After

The case concerns the murder of Jessica Lal on 30 April 1999, for which Sidhartha Vashisht (Manu Sharma) and two co‑accused were initially acquitted by the trial court. The State appealed, alleging that the prosecution had proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt through ocular …

RAM BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 220Dismissed

The appellants were convicted of dacoity under Section 395 IPC based on eyewitness identification in court and a test identification parade conducted under a magistrate's supervision. They challenged the admissibility of the parade evidence, arguing that the delay in conducting it rendered the …

ABU THAKIR AND ORS.versusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADU

2010 INSC 222Dismissed

The appellants were convicted of murder (Section 302 IPC) based largely on the testimony of three eye‑witnesses (PWs 2‑4) who claimed to have seen the assailants stabbing the deceased. The defence challenged the conviction, arguing that the presence of these witnesses at the scene was doubtful and …

M.C. ALI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2010 INSC 207Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by six accused who had been acquitted by the trial court but later convicted by the High Court for murder, attempted murder and offences under sections 149 and 34 of the IPC. The trial court had found the prosecution's evidence unreliable, noting the darkness of …

HIRABHAI JHAVERBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & OHS.

2010 INSC 203Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under Section 324 IPC for an offence committed on 23 July 1986 and sentenced to six months' imprisonment. The Gujarat High Court upheld the conviction and rejected the appellant's application to compound the offence. After the conviction, the victims filed an affidavit …

UTTAM CHAKRABORTYversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2010 INSC 198Appeal(s) allowed

An eight‑month‑pregnant woman was found dead with severe abdominal injuries and the foetus removed. The husband, Mission Suklabaidhya, and his friend, Uttam Chakraborty, were convicted of murder; the husband received the death penalty and the friend life imprisonment. Both appealed to the Supreme …

BANARSI DASSversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 193Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a patwari, was accused of demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.400 for correcting land records, leading to his conviction under Section 161 of the IPC and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The prosecution's case relied on the recovery of the money from the …

SUNDERLAL KANAIYALAL BHATIJAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 185Dismissed

The appellant, convicted in a TADA case based on a confession recorded by a police officer, was later charged in a separate proceeding for offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Arms Act. The prosecution sought to introduce the earlier TADA confession as evidence in the IPC trial, but …

DALCO ENGINEERING PRIVATE LTD.versusSHREE SATISH PRABHAKAR PADHYE AND ORS.

2010 INSC 183

The case concerned two writ petitions challenging the termination of a disabled employee by a private limited company and the termination of a contract with a public trust. Both petitioners sought relief under section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and …

PATAI @ KRISHNA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 182Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Vikramaditya Singh, in which the appellants Patai @ Krishna Kumar and Brij Kishore were accused of accosting the victim with pistols, dragging him to a spot under a peepal tree and facilitating his killing by co‑accused who fired the fatal shots. The …

RAVICHANDRANversusSTATE BY DY. SUPERIN. OF POLICE, MADRAS

2010 INSC 169Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for conspiracy, cheating, forgery of a palmolein oil permit and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and Essential Commodities Act. The prosecution alleged that accused A1, A2 and A4 had interpolated and forged the permit, relying mainly on handwriting …

K. NEELAVENIversusSTATE REP. BY INSP. OF POLICE AND ORS.

2010 INSC 160Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant-wife, K. Neelaveni, complained that her husband had contracted a second marriage, given gold ornaments, subjected her to cruelty and forced her to abort a pregnancy, leading to a police charge‑sheet under IPC sections 406, 494 and 498A. The accused filed a petition in the Madras High …

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusJAGDISH

2010 INSC 159Dismissed

Jagdish, a Class‑3 life convict sentenced in 1999, applied for premature release after serving more than ten years. The High Court ordered his case to be considered under the remission policy dated 04‑02‑1993, rejecting the newer short‑sentencing policy of 13‑08‑2008. The State appealed, arguing …

RAMESHBHAI PANDURAO HEDAUversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2010 INSC 157Dismissed

The appellant's brother was found dead and a post‑mortem concluded natural causes; the police investigation was closed. Dissatisfied, the appellant filed a complaint before a Metropolitan Magistrate alleging murder and sought a fresh police investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal …

JABAR SINGHversusDINESH & ANR.

2010 INSC 145Case Allowed

The appellant, father of a murder victim, challenged a High Court order that the accused (Respondent No.1) be tried as a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The accused had filed an application under Section 49 of the Act claiming he was under 18 on the …

AKLOO AHIRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 143Dismissed

In 1981, Kishore Bhagat was shot dead after a series of altercations involving several accused. Akaloo Ahir, the appellant, fired a shot that missed the victim, while another co-accused fired the fatal shot. All were charged under Sections 302, 307 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. …

JITEN BESRAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 141Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Jiten Besra was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his parents‑in‑law based on three circumstantial points: his presence in the village on the night of the killings, a strained relationship with the victims, and alleged blood stains on his clothing. The Supreme Court …

STATE OF M.P.versusSUGHAR SINGH & ORS.

2010 INSC 132Disposed off

Eight persons were tried by a Sessions Court in Madhya Pradesh for murder and related offences under the Indian Penal Code. The High Court set aside their convictions, and the State appealed, but only four of the accused were impleaded as respondents in the appeal. The Supreme Court, in a 2008 …

DHARAMVEER AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 134Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for offences under Sections 148, 302/149 and 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of two persons, based on medical evidence, post‑mortem reports and the testimony of two eye‑witnesses. They appealed to the Supreme Court under Article 136, challenging the …

SANGAPPA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 136Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were tried for offences under Sections 447, 504, 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and were acquitted by the trial court. The State appealed, and the High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting them under Section 304(Part‑II) read with Section 34, without providing a detailed …

KHILAN & ANRversusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 137Dismissed

The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted eight persons for the murder of Toophan Singh, alleging a land dispute and an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons. The trial court convicted Prema, Khilan, Gainda and Sangram Singh under IPC sections 302 and 34, sentencing them to life imprisonment, …

JAVED MASOOD AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2010 INSC 138Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Javed Masood and another were convicted for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's brother (PW‑5), who lodged a Parcha Bayan. Independent witnesses, including the shop owner (PW‑6) and several police personnel (PW‑18, PW‑29, PW‑30), testified that the …

MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SC. & ORS.versusSATCHIKITSA PRASARAK MANDAL & ORS.

2010 INSC 124Appeal(s) allowed

The Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (MUHS) constituted a Grievance Committee under Section 53 of the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998 to address complaints of two unapproved lecturers (the 5th and 6th respondents) alleging sexual harassment and other mistreatment. The …

STATE OF U.P.versusGURU CHARAN & OTHERS

2010 INSC 116Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed to the Supreme Court under Article 136 against the Allahabad High Court’s acquittal of Guru Charan, Sunil, Pramod and Brahma Pal for the alleged murder of Ramesh Narain and Jitendra (Guddu) and the murderous assault on Nathu Singh. The trial court had convicted …

KIRPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 117Dismissed

The appellant, Kirpal Singh, was convicted for murdering Ram Kumar Singh after allegedly firing a gunshot during a family dispute. The trial court and High Court relied on the medical testimony confirming a homicidal death and on eyewitness accounts of the appellant's wife and son, which were …

ABDUL MANNANversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2010 INSC 109Dismissed

The case arose from an assault on Abdul Hakim and his brothers on 17 February 1994, during which Abdul Karim was also attacked and later died of his injuries. Six persons, including Abdul Mannan, were charged under Sections 302, 132, 313 and 34 of the IPC. The trial court acquitted all accused, but …

SATYAVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 96Dismissed

Satyavir Singh, armed with his brother's licensed double‑barrel gun, fired two shots at Dharam Prakash, the brother of an informant, injuring him. The trial court convicted Singh under Section 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act; the first appellate court acquitted him on the basis that the …

RAJU & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 94Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the conviction of two appellants, Raju and Mangli, under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Ishwar. The incident arose after the deceased misbehaved with women at a marriage ceremony, leading the accused to assault him; the …

KUSUM SHARMA & OTHERSversusBATRA HOSPITAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE & OTHERS

2010 INSC 95Dismissed

The appellants filed a complaint under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging deficiency in service and medical negligence after the death of the husband who underwent adrenal surgery at Batra Hospital. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the complaint, …

MULLA & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 89Disposed off

The appellants Mulla and Guddu were convicted for abducting and murdering five villagers for ransom, based on the testimony of injured eye‑witnesses and a test identification parade (TIP) conducted after a delay. The Supreme Court held that the TIP was properly conducted and its evidence admissible, …

G.V. SIDDARAMESHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 80Dismissed

The appellant Siddaramesh was convicted for the death of his wife Usha, who committed suicide by hanging within seven years of marriage. The prosecution proved that the husband and his family had repeatedly demanded dowry—gold, cash and a motorcycle—and that the wife was subjected to mental and …

SATNI BAIversusSTATE OF M. P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH)

2010 INSC 67Dismissed

Satni Bai was convicted of murdering her four‑year‑old son under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: witnesses (her brother‑in‑law, sister‑in‑law and a 16‑year‑old girl) saw her standing near the corpse with a blood‑stained axe, the axe and her saree were found …

POONAM CHAND JAIN AND ANR.versusFAZRU

2010 INSC 63Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent filed a criminal complaint alleging fraud in a land transaction, which was dismissed by a Judicial Magistrate under Section 203 of the CrPC. After the dismissal became final, the respondent filed a second complaint on almost identical facts, suppressing the existence of the first …

MUSHEER KHAN @ BADSHAH KHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 64Disposed off

The prosecution alleged that Musheer Khan (A‑4) and Basant Shiva (A‑5) were hired killers who shot the deceased Mallu Bhaiya at close range, based largely on circumstantial evidence and the testimony of two eyewitnesses, PW‑3 and PW‑4. The trial court convicted them of murder under IPC s.302/1208 …

RAM SINGH @ CHHAJUversusSTATE OF H.P.

2010 INSC 65Dismissed

The appellant Ram Singh was accused of raping a 40-year-old midwife, Chanchala Devi, on the night of 12-13 August 1989, after being persuaded to accompany a co-accused to a village. The victim testified that she was gagged, assaulted, and forced into sexual intercourse, a narrative corroborated by …

P. VIJAYANversusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.

2010 INSC 61Dismissed

P. Vijayan, a retired IPS officer aged about 85, was charge‑sheeted under IPC sections 302 and 34 for the alleged killing of a Naxalite in a 1970 encounter that was later claimed to be fake. The CBI investigation relied on an extra‑judicial confession by a constable and several statements. Vijayan …

JUGRAJversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 62Disposed off

Four persons, including Jugraj Singh, were accused of murdering former MLA Bachhitter Singh in December 1996. The trial court convicted all under Sections 302, 34 and related provisions, but the High Court acquitted three co‑accused while upholding Jugraj's conviction, relying on the recovery of a …

VIKRAM SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 58Disposed off

The appellants Vikram Singh, Jasvir Singh and Sonia were convicted for kidnapping a 16‑year‑old boy, Abhi Verma, for ransom, administering chloroform and pentazocine which caused his death, and for conspiracy under Sections 302, 364A, 201 and 120‑8 IPC. The Supreme Court examined the sufficiency of …

DARSHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2010 INSC 45Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a land‑dispute in which Gurcharan Singh attacked Bakhtawar Singh with a gandasa, after which Darshan Singh, the son of Bakhtawar, fired two shots from his licensed gun, killing Gurcharan Singh. The accused pleaded private defence, claiming a reasonable apprehension of death or …

SUDHIR KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 42Dismissed

The appellant Sudhir Kumar was convicted under Section 304B of the IPC for the dowry death of his wife, Kamlesh Rani, while his mother and other relatives were acquitted. The Supreme Court examined whether the presumption of dowry death under Section 113B of the Evidence Act was rebutted because …

CHANDRAWATIversusRAMJI TIWARI & ANR. ETC.

2010 INSC 43Dismissed

The case arose from a 1997 incident in which Ramji Tiwari, armed with a double‑barrel gun, shot and killed several persons after being urged by co‑accused. The trial court convicted Ramji under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to death, while the other four accused were convicted under Section 302 …

VIJAY KUMAR ARORAversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

2010 INSC 40Dismissed

Vijay Kumar Arora was convicted of murdering his wife, who died from over 90% burn injuries. The prosecution proved that the death was homicidal, not suicidal or accidental, through medical evidence, the victim’s verbal dying declaration before six witnesses, and evidence of physical and mental …

AFTAB AHMAD ANSARIversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL

2010 INSC 33Dismissed

The appellant was convicted for the rape and murder of a five‑year‑old girl and for causing disappearance of evidence, based primarily on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution proved that the appellant was seen fleeing the scene, that blood‑stained clothes of the victim were recovered from his …

DINESH JAISWALversusSTATE OF M. P.

2010 INSC 34Appeal(s) allowed

On 8 July 1987 the prosecutrix alleged that the appellant entered her house, assaulted her with three tangi blows and raped her, after which she snatched the weapon and injured him. Both parties were said to have become unconscious; the husband, son and a relative arrived, and an FIR was lodged. The …

BENGAI MANDAL @ BEGAI MANDALversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 29Case Partly allowed

The appellant and a co-accused entered the deceased's house at night and the co-accused poured acid on her, causing severe burns and eventual death. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, along with other offences, and sentenced him to life imprisonment. …

HARI KISHANversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 13Disposed off

The appellant Hari Kishan was convicted under sections 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his brother's sibling Dinesh, based primarily on the testimony of Harkesh (PW‑2), who claimed to be an eye‑witness and to have sustained injuries in the same incident. The trial and High …

BODDELLA BABUL REDDYversusPUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P.

2010 INSC 14Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Boddella Babul Reddy, was convicted by the Andhra Pradesh High Court for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) arising from a factional clash in which he was alleged to have hurled a bomb that killed a coolie. The trial court had acquitted all accused, including the appellant, on the ground that the …

HARINARAYAN G. BAJAJversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2010 INSC 15Dismissed

In a criminal proceeding under Sections 406 and 114 IPC, the trial court had framed charges against respondents No.2‑4 and later, under Section 319(1) Cr.P.C., added respondent No.5 as a co‑accused. The newly added accused sought to have the proceedings against him commenced afresh from the inquiry …

INDRESH KUMARversusRAM PHAL AND ORS.

2010 INSC 16Appeal(s) allowed

Indresh Kumar alleged that Inspector Ramphal and six other police officers tortured him and his family in 1992. The trial court convicted Ramphal under IPC sections 218, 342 and 323, while acquitting the six co‑accused. The High Court later set aside Ramphal’s conviction and acquitted all accused, …

SUNIL KUMAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 17Dismissed

The appellants Sunil Kumar, Tilak Singh and Ram Singh were convicted under Section 304 Part II read with Sections 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code for the death of Salim, who died from head injuries inflicted with sticks. The prosecution relied on the testimony of three eye‑witnesses, including …

GANGULA MOHAN REDDYversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2010 INSC 10Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an agriculturist, was convicted under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abetting the suicide of his farm labourer, Ramulu, by accusing him of theft and demanding money. The prosecution relied on the testimonies of the deceased's father and mother, who claimed the …

SHEETALA PRASAD AND ORS.versusSRI KANT AND ANR.

2009 INSC 1319Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were acquitted of an offence under Section 308 IPC by the Sessions Court, which instead convicted them under Section 324 r/w 149 IPC and released them on probation. The private complainant filed a criminal revision under Section 401(3) CrPC, and the High Court set aside the acquittal, …

HDFC BANK LTD.versusJ.J. MANNAN @ J.M. JOHN PAUL & ANR.

2009 INSC 1314Case Partly allowed

The HDFC Bank alleged that its Managing Director, J.J. Mannan, defrauded the bank of Rs.2.04 crore by obtaining a loan through fictitious transactions and colluding with other firms. An FIR was filed and the accused applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, which the Madras High …

RAVINDRA SAXENAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2009 INSC 1304Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a property dealer, was charged in FIR No.107/2007 for cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy arising from a dispute over the sale of flats. He repeatedly applied for anticipatory bail, but the Rajasthan High Court rejected each application on the ground that a challan had been …

SHARDAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2009 INSC 1305Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Sarla suffered severe burns on 16 August 1999 and died on 19 August 1999. Three dying declarations were recorded: the first two (Ex D‑3 and Ex P‑3) were taken on the day of the incident by police in the presence of doctors, wherein she stated the fire was accidental and no one was …

DILIP PREMNARAYAN TIWARI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2009 INSC 1295Dismissed

The appellants Dilip Premnarayan Tiwari, Manoj Paswan and Sunil Ramashray Yadav were convicted for the brutal murder of three persons and the grievous injury of others during an attack motivated by opposition to an inter‑caste marriage. The prosecution relied mainly on the testimony of two injured …

RAMRAJ @ NANHOO @ BIHNUversusSTATE OF CHHATIISGARH

2009 INSC 1297Dismissed

Ramraj, convicted under IPC sections 302 and 201 for murdering his wife, was sentenced to life imprisonment. The High Court upheld the conviction, and the petitioner sought release after serving 14 years, arguing that remission had effectively reduced his term to about 17 years. The Supreme Court …

KAILASH NATHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 1298Dismissed

The case involved a night‑time shooting in which Deep Singh was killed and his wife Chhoti was injured; eight persons were alleged to have participated. The trial court convicted all seven surviving accused under Sections 302, 149 and 307 of the IPC. The Allahabad High Court acquitted four accused …

PANNEY @ PRATAP NARAIN SHUKLA & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 1294Dismissed

The appellants Panney @ Pratap Narain Shukla and Channey @ Prabhu Narain Shukla were convicted for the murder of Shivdhari, who was killed by a bomb, a pistol shot and a neck cut during a land‑dispute. The trial court sentenced them to death, a decision affirmed by the High Court and upheld on …

KAMAL NAYAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.

2009 INSC 1287Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a confirmed peon appointed in 1980, was dismissed in 2002 for allegedly providing false information in a 1994 attestation form concerning arrests and pending cases. The High Court upheld the dismissal, relying on the decision in Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. Ram Ratan Yadav, which …

STATE OF U.P.versusRAM SAJIVAN & ORS.

2009 INSC 1283Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted eighteen accused Thakurs for dacoity, abduction, and the murder of seven Harijan victims, of whom only two bodies were recovered and one survivor gave a dying declaration. The trial court convicted all accused under IPC ss.302, 149, 364 and 201, sentencing them …

SUNILversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2009 INSC 1285Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Sunil was convicted under IPC sections 363, 366A and 376 for kidnapping and raping a girl named Pinki. The central issue was whether Pinki was a minor at the time of the offence. The prosecution relied on a school leaving certificate and the father's approximate statement of age, while …

BHAGWATI PRASADversusSTATE OF M.P.

2009 INSC 1276Dismissed

The incident occurred on 18 February 1984 when the appellant Bhagwati Prasad and other accused, armed with a spear and lathis, obstructed the complainants from opening an irrigation canal. When the deceased Ramgopal intervened, the appellant allegedly struck him on the back with a spear, causing …

K.H. SHEKARAPPA & OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2009 INSC 1282Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the case of seven police constables and one additional constable (appellants) accused of beating five suspects in police custody, resulting in two deaths and injuries to three others. The prosecution presented ocular testimony, extensive medical evidence, and the testimony …

NEELAM BAHAL & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2009 INSC 1271Disposed off

The dispute arose when a servant, Shanichar, left Satish Chandra's tea shop over wage issues and joined Rakesh Bahal. This led to a heated altercation during which Rakesh Bahal, armed with a knife, inflicted injuries on Satish Chandra. Rakesh, his mother Raj Bahal and sister Neelam Bahal were …

WAHID KHANversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2009 INSC 1266Dismissed

The appellant, Wahid Khan, was convicted under Section 376 of the IPC for raping a 12‑year‑old girl, while being acquitted of Section 366. The prosecution relied on the consistent testimony of the victim, an FIR lodged immediately after the incident, and the eyewitness account of a police …

SUKHDEEP SINGH @ DEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2009 INSC 1267Dismissed

The appellant Sukhdeep Singh was charged with murder under IPC s.302 for allegedly firing at his rival, Karam Singh, resulting in death. The trial court acquitted him, holding that the eyewitness testimony conflicted with the medical report and that the recovered .303 cartridge could not have been …

ABBAS AHMAD CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2009 INSC 1262Disposed off

On 15 September 1997 three accused—Md. Mizazul Haq, Abbas Ahmad Choudhary and an absconding Ranju Das—kidnapped, gagged and raped a girl aged about 13‑15 years. The trial court convicted both appellants under Sections 376 and 336 of the Indian Penal Code, a decision upheld by the Gauhati High Court. …

JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND ORS.versusNATHU RAM

2009 INSC 1254Dismissed

Nathu Ram, a former employee of the Rajasthan State Electricity Board (later Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.), was suspended in 1979 after being caught accepting a bribe and was convicted in 1982, leading to his dismissal. The High Court acquitted him in 1997 and reinstated him, granting full pay …

MD. MONIR ALAMversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2009 INSC 1250Dismissed

The case arose from a land demarcation dispute in which a fight broke out, leading to the death of lmteyaz Ali. Monir Alam and others were convicted under IPC sections 304(11) and 323, with Alam sentenced to three years. The High Court altered the conviction to include section 149 but upheld the …

AMARJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2009 INSC 1245Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a violent incident in July 1998 in which Gurnam Singh was killed and Joginder Singh injured. The accused, including Amarjit Singh and Sher Singh, were convicted of murder under s.302 IPC by the trial court, which accepted the prosecution's version despite doubts about the …

RAM BHAROSEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 1240Dismissed

The appellant Ram Bharosey was convicted for the murder of Puran Singh under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution proved that the appellant and co‑accused fired shots at the victim, resulting in his death, and identified the appellant through the first informant’s testimony and …

. SAU PANCHASHLLA DADA MESSHRAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2009 INSC 1241Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Sau Panchashila Dada Messhram, and her husband confined their two‑year‑old daughter in a bathroom for 14 days without food or water, leading to the child's death by starvation. The trial court convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and sentenced them to life …

PASHAURA SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2009 INSC 1236Appeal(s) allowed

Pashaura Singh married Kamaljeet Kaur in 1997, moved to Canada and obtained a divorce decree from the Supreme Court of British Columbia in February 2001. After returning to India he remarried on 2 January 2002. Kamaljeet's brother filed an FIR under IPC sections 494 (bigamy), 498A (dowry harassment) …

R.P. TYAGIversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

2009 INSC 1229Dismissed

In 1987 a police constable was stabbed by Mahender and Ram Kumar. The SHO, R.P. Tyagi, detained the accused's family members and beat them, leading to Mahender's death. Tyagi was initially convicted of murder under IPC s.302 and sentenced to death, but the Delhi High Court modified the conviction to …

AMALENDU PAL @ JHANTUversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2009 INSC 1228Case Partly allowed

Amalendu Pal, married to Dipika since 1977, began an extramarital relationship with Anita and, after being denied permission to marry her, subjected Dipika to physical and mental torture. He brought Anita to his home three months before Dipika's suicide by hanging on 27 September 1991. The trial …

GAJULA SURYA PRAKASARAOversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2009 INSC 1226Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Gajula Surya Prakasa Rao was convicted under Sections 302 and 307 IPC for murdering a farmer and attempting to kill his wife, based primarily on the testimony of the deceased’s wife (PW‑3) and daughter (PW‑4). The Supreme Court examined the credibility of these eye‑witnesses, noting …

NAIMUDDINversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2009 INSC 1217Case Partly allowed

The case arose from a land dispute in which the victim Munshi Basiruddin, aged 78, was killed when bricks were thrown at him by the accused Naimuddin and Muslim Mian. The trial court convicted both under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to life …

MD. ANKOOS & ORS.versusTHE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, H!GH COURT OF A.P.

2009 INSC 1218Appeal(s) allowed

The accused (MD. Ankoos & others) were charged with murder, rioting, house trespass and related offences for the killing of five villagers suspected of sorcery. The trial court acquitted all 77 accused, finding the eye‑witness testimonies (PW‑2 to PW‑4) unreliable and noting contradictions. The High …

JAMEELversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 1221Dismissed

Jameel and Dastgir assaulted Hasib with a lathi, fracturing his left parietal bone. Both were convicted under Section 308 IPC for attempt to commit culpable homicide and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment; the High Court later acquitted Dastgir but upheld Jameel's conviction. Jameel …

JAYABALANversusU.T. OF PONDICHERRY

2009 INSC 1223Dismissed

Jayabalan was convicted of murdering his wife Vasanthi after the High Court reversed a trial‑court acquittal. The prosecution proved that the couple’s relationship was strained, the husband had beaten the wife, poured kerosene on her and set her on fire, as corroborated by an oral dying declaration …

BHARAT AMRATLAL KOTHARI AND ANOTHERversusDOSUKHAN SAMADKHAN SINDHI AND ORS.

2009 INSC 1213Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by animal‑right activist Bharat Kothari against a Gujarat High Court order that quashed an FIR alleging cruelty to nearly 2,000 goats and sheep and simultaneously convicted six livestock owners (respondents) under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, …

PRABIR MONDAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2009 INSC 1203Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Prabir Mondal, others and Mongal Das were convicted under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged attempt to murder the complainant in a pump room. The prosecution claimed the victim was attacked with a knife, resulting in incised injuries to his left palm and …

PARMINDER KAURversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 1198Appeal(s) allowed

Parminder Kaur, a 74‑year‑old woman, was prosecuted under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly altering dates in certified revenue records used in civil suits she filed in 2002. The FIR was lodged by her brother‑in‑law, Hargursharan Singh, and the High Court refused to quash the criminal …

ALAGARSAMY AND ORS.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY DY. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

2009 INSC 1196Dismissed

The case arose from a caste‑based election dispute in Melavalavu village where six Dalits were murdered and forty persons were charged, seventeen of whom were convicted under IPC sections 302, 149 and 34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellants challenged their convictions on the …

SOHAN SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2009 INSC 1181Dismissed

The appellants, Sohan Singh and Mohan Singh, were convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the IPC for gang raping the prosecutrix on 23 July 1983. The accused challenged the conviction on grounds of delayed FIR filing, absence of physical injuries on the victim, and alleged family enmity leading to …

MANKAMMAversusSTATE OF KERALA

2009 INSC 1175Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mankamma, a mother‑in‑law, was convicted under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abetting the suicide of her daughter‑in‑law, Bindu. The prosecution relied on the testimony of eleven witnesses, including the deceased's father, brother, sister‑in‑law, a classmate, and …

PANDURANG CHANDRAKANT MHATRE & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2009 INSC 1177Case Partly allowed

In Phunde village, Maharashtra, a clash between rival political factions (PWP and Congress‑I) on the night of 2‑3 April 1988 resulted in the murder of Suresh Atmaram Gharat and injuries to several others. Nineteen accused were charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149, 307 and 326 read …

NEELU CHOPRA AND ANR.versusBHARTI

2009 INSC 1167Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent Bharti filed a criminal complaint under IPC sections 406, 498A read with 114 against her husband Rajesh, his parents Neelu and Krishan Sarup Chopra, and a sister‑in‑law, alleging dowry demands, retention of jewellery and physical assault. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the …

ARULVELU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND ANOTHER

2009 INSC 1168Appeal(s) allowed

Arulvelu and his father were charged under IPC s.304B and s.498A for allegedly forcing their wife Mangayarkarasi to commit suicide by demanding dowry. The trial court, after a detailed examination of the evidence and noting that the suicide note did not implicate any accused, acquitted them. The …

RAM SUNDER MAHTO AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2009 INSC 1170Disposed off

Four elderly men were convicted under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code for a dacoity in which the loot amounted to Rs.2,860 cash, one Iota and one glass, and two persons were injured by firearms. The trial court sentenced eleven accused to life imprisonment and the four appellants to five years' …

UMAPADA KAYALversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2009 INSC 1163Case Partly allowed

Nine persons were tried for the murder of Shaktipada Kayal in 1983. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the High Court upheld the acquittal of eight and convicted the appellant, Umapada Kayal, under Section 304 Part‑II IPC based on eye‑witnesses and post‑mortem evidence, sentencing him to ten …

PARSHOTAM LAL & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2009 INSC 1164Dismissed

The accused, Parshotam Lal and Ved Parkash, were convicted under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping and raping a minor girl, Tripta, and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment. The High Court reduced the sentence to one year and six months. During the pendency of the appeal, …

RATHINAM @ RATHINANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

2009 INSC 1166Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the rape and murder of a mill worker, Chitra, for which Rathinam, the son of the mill owner, was charged under Sections 376, 302 and 201 of the IPC. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the High Court reversed this acquittal based largely on the later statements of two …

ARUN KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2009 INSC 1162Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the murder conviction of Arun Kumar Sharma under Section 302 IPC for the death of his wife Sushma Devi. The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of a single eye‑witness, PW‑1, whose statements were found to be casual, contradictory and unexplained, especially his …

SONALI MUKHERJEEversusUNION OF INDIA

2009 INSC 1161Dismissed

The case involved the death of Biswajit, alleged to be a murder committed by his wife Sonali Mukherjee (A‑1) and her alleged lover Assadid Poddar (A‑2) through gardenal poisoning. The trial court convicted both under s.302 IPC; the Madras High Court acquitted A‑2 and reduced A‑1's conviction to …

JAG DISHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2009 INSC 1155Dismissed

Jagdish was convicted of murdering his wife and five minor children after his brother and neighbours saw him with a blood‑stained knife and the bodies. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence, medical post‑mortems and the appellant’s self‑inflicted injuries, and sentenced him to death. On …

RAJ NARAIN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2009 INSC 1156Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a shooting at a petrol pump in Jaunpur district where two sons of the complainant were killed. The trial court convicted three accused under sections 302, 307, 323, 342 IPC and sections 27, 30 of the Arms Act, but the Allahabad High Court acquitted them. On appeal, the Supreme …

ASHOK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 1158Dismissed

Four accused, including Ashok Singh and Shyam Saran Singh, shot Chhota Singh, who died from a gunshot wound. The trial court convicted all four under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC based on the testimony of the deceased's son (PW3) and an independent witness (PW4), along with forensic evidence …

D. VENKATASUBRAMANIAM AND ORS.versusM.K. MOHAN KRISHNAMACHARI AND ANR.

2009 INSC 1132

The case arose from a dispute over a Memorandum of Understanding for the sale of land, after which the respondent lodged an FIR against the appellants for offences under sections 406 and 420 IPC. The police began investigating, but the respondent filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC …

SATISH NARAYAN SAWANTversusSTATE OF GOA

2009 INSC 1133Disposed off

Satish Narayan Sawant was accused of stabbing Rauji Dulba Sawant, resulting in the latter's death. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the High Court convicted Sawant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the FIR was …

BALWANTBHAI B. PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2009 INSC 1122Appeal(s) allowed

On 30 November 1993, three accused—Thakorbhai, Jagdishbhai and Balwantbhai Patel—attacked a group of men in Bharuch, resulting in the death of Sagir Ahmed. Balwantbhai Patel was alleged to have caught hold of Gyasuddin Ansari, enabling Jagdishbhai to inflict a simple injury. All three were convicted …

HAZARI LAL DASversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.

2009 INSC 1114Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, headmaster of Sambhunagar High School, was accused of opening a bank account with his servant and misappropriating Rs.6 lakh, leading to a complaint and FIR under several IPC sections. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, which the Sessions Judge granted …

MD. IBRAHIM & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

2009 INSC 1110Case Partly allowed

The complainant MD Ibrahim alleged that his land was sold by the first accused to the second accused and that the witness, scribe and stamp vendor colluded to forge the sale deeds, also assaulting him when confronted. The trial court framed charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 471, 504, 323 and 341 …

STATE OF U. P.versusSANTOSH KUMAR

2009 INSC 1106Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Santosh Kumar and others for the murder of Sunita, alleging dowry harassment. The trial court convicted Santosh Kumar under sections 302, 498‑A IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, acquitting him of section 304‑B IPC. The Allahabad High Court …

CHIKKARANGAIAH & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2009 INSC 1105Disposed off

The case arose from a long‑standing land dispute in which the deceased and his brother were assaulted, and subsequently PW‑6, an injured witness, was chased and assaulted by eight accused, sustaining grievous injuries. The trial court acquitted the accused of both the murder charge (s.302 IPC) and …

SUSHIL KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2009 INSC 1097Case Partly allowed

The appellant Sushil Kumar was convicted of murdering his wife and two young children and was sentenced to death. The prosecution proved the murders through eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence, and the appellant's own disclosure memo, while the alibi he claimed was rejected as contradictory. The …

DHANAPALversusSTATE BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADRAS

2009 INSC 1099Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Dhanapal and co‑accused were acquitted by the Sessions Judge of offences under IPC ss.307, 302 read with s.34. The Madras High Court set aside the acquittal, convicted them and imposed life imprisonment and five years. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the High Court was …

MAHESH CHAND SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2009 INSC 1090Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mahesh Chand Sharma, purchased land and obtained possession, but the accused (Panna Lal, Ram Babu and Rajkumar) colluded with an area lekhpal to have the property mutated in their names through a false report. The appellant filed a complaint under Section 156(3) CrPC, leading to …

SUCHITA SRIVASTAVA & ANR.versusCHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION

2009 INSC 1086Disposed off

The case concerned a 19‑20‑year‑old woman with mild to moderate mental retardation, an orphan residing in a government welfare home, who became pregnant around the 19th week of gestation after an alleged rape. The Chandigarh Administration sought the High Court’s approval to terminate the pregnancy, …

HARU GHOSHversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2009 INSC 1084Disposed off

Haru Ghosh was convicted of murdering a woman (Anima) and her 12‑year‑old son (Subhankar) and of attempting to murder a 60‑year‑old man (Jeevan Krishna) under IPC sections 302, 307 and 326, receiving a death sentence and additional rigorous imprisonments. The Supreme Court examined the voluminous …

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusNARESH @ RAM NARESH

2009 INSC 1078Dismissed

The State of Rajasthan appealed the Rajasthan High Court’s acquittal of Naresh, who was charged under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for murdering a woman, amputating her feet, and stealing her jewellery. The trial court had convicted him based on four strands of circumstantial evidence, but the High …

JARNAIL SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2009 INSC 1079Dismissed

The case arose from a violent dispute over land where the accused forcibly entered a tube well, injured the complainant and migrant labourers, and threw a dead labourer’s body into a canal. The trial court convicted all accused under multiple IPC sections and the Arms Act; the High Court acquitted …

TAMEEZUDDIN @ TAMMUversusSTATE OF (NCT) OF DELHI

2009 INSC 1080Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under IPC sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) based on the testimony of the prosecutrix and her husband, who alleged that the appellant had raped the woman in a factory and threatened her. Medical examination found no injuries and only semen on the …

GURMUKH SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2009 INSC 1074Case Partly allowed

Gurmukh Singh was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for delivering a single lathi blow to Hazoor Singh, who died six days later. The trial and High Courts upheld the conviction and life sentence. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the facts—no prior enmity, spur‑of‑the‑moment …

RAMESH AND ANRversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 1075Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for the murder of Raj Kumar under Section 302 read with Sections 149, 147 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses, Prahlad (PW‑4) and Daya Wati (PW‑5), who were alleged to be interested witnesses, and on …

IN RE: CRL. INTIMIDATION OF CAT MEMBERversus*

2009 INSC 1072Disposed off

A Judicial Member of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Shri B.V. Rao, was staying in a state‑run guest house when senior police officials, led by Inspector General Nirmala Choudhary, forcibly entered his room, abused and intimidated him, and seized his documents. An FIR was lodged under …

M.N. OJHA & ORS.versusALOK KUMAR SRIVASTAV & ANR.

2009 INSC 1063Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, bank officials, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a criminal complaint filed by a guarantor alleging offences under the IPC. The Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance of the complaint and issued non‑bailable …

GAMINI BALA KOTESWARA RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF AP. THR. SECRETARY

2009 INSC 1055Dismissed

The case arose from a violent incident during the 1995 Mandal elections in Gadiparthivaripalem, where the candidate Soodidela Satyanarayana Reddy was murdered by a group of about twenty accused armed with stones, knives and axes. The trial court acquitted all accused, deeming the two eye‑witnesses …

MURLI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2009 INSC 1052Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Patwari Virendra Singh, for which appellants Murli and Heera were convicted under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149. The prosecution’s case rested on two eye‑witnesses, Lakendra Singh (PW‑1) and Sadri Lal (PW‑2), whose statements were recorded after …

STATE OF U.P. & ANR.versusMAN MOHAN NATH SINHA & ANR.

2009 INSC 1049Appeal(s) allowed

Man Mohan Nath Sinha, a private secretary to a Uttar Pradesh state minister, was dismissed from service after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of misappropriating public funds. He challenged the dismissal before the Allahabad High Court, which set aside the order by re‑appreciating the …

PAN NAYARversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2009 INSC 1051Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Pannayar was convicted for the murder of Thilagavalli and theft of her gold ornaments under Sections 302, 392 and 397 of the IPC, based largely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution's case hinged on (i) a witness who claimed to have seen the accused following the victim, (ii) …

STATE OF PUNJABversusRAJINDER SINGH

2009 INSC 1042Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Harinder Kumar, who was shot during a dispute over brick‑kiln ownership. Rajinder Singh was convicted by the trial court under IPC s.302 and the Arms Act s.27, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted him, relying on a conflict between eyewitness testimony that …

BHERU LAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2009 INSC 1039

The case involved the murder of two brothers, sons of PW‑7, and the arson of her property by a group of accused persons. The trial court convicted all seven accused under sections of the IPC including 302 and 436, but the High Court acquitted one accused (A‑6) and upheld the convictions of the …

CHITRESH KUMAR CHOPRAversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

2009 INSC 1040Dismissed

The appellant, Chitresh Kumar Chopra, was charged under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the IPC for allegedly abetting the suicide of his business partner, Jitendra Sharma, by mental harassment over a profit dispute. The trial court framed charges, finding sufficient material to presume that the …

S. PALANI VELAYUTHAM & ORS.versusDISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUNVELVELI, TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2009 INSC 1028Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined an acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 where only the life‑interest holders (recorded in revenue records) were served notice, while the vested remaindermen (not recorded) were not. The petitioners argued that the remaindermen were entitled to notice and …

SUDHIR SHANTILAL MEHTAversusC.B.I.

2009 INSC 1035Disposed off

The case concerned the discounting and rediscounting of two bills of exchange by UCO Bank, allegedly to provide funds to stock‑broker Harshad Mehta for securities transactions. The Supreme Court examined whether the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 …

MANI BENversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2009 INSC 1036Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a mother‑in‑law, threw a burning wick onto her daughter‑in‑law who was wearing terylene clothing, causing severe burns. The victim was hospitalized with about 60% burns and died after eight days due to septicemia, a complication of the injuries. The trial court convicted the appellant …