Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

16935 judgments · newest first · showing 1401–1600

RAJESH MANI TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajesh Mani Tripathi, filed two applications before the Allahabad High Court: one under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a July 30, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a rape case (CrPC Section 376) and another under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the …

MOHD. GHAIURULLAH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 2 August 2025 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia, which had rejected a compromise entered on 3 April 2025 in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, …

PROMOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Promod Kumar, appealed against the cognizance and summoning order of the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, contending that the FIR did not specifically allege casteist slurs and that no prima facie case existed. The State argued that the injured witnesses' …

ZEESHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Zeeshan, accused of rape under IPC sections 64(1), 333 and 351(3). The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, the victim's medico‑legal report did not substantiate rape, there was no alarm raised, and he …

SACHIN TOMAR ALIAS SACHIN KUMAR TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order dated 4 April 2024 in Criminal Case No. 24805 of 2024, wherein he was charged under Sections 420, 406, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The crux of the dispute was …

VIVEK PATHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vivek Pathan was arrested in Crime No. 425 of 2026 under several IPC sections and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act for allegedly forcing a Hindu woman to convert to Islam. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, he had no prior criminal …

MOHD IRFANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Mohd Irfan, who is charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 317(2), 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act in Crime No. 276 of 2026. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of …

RAMKARANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ramkaran, who was arrested in connection with a human trafficking case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33836 of 2026) involving IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 143, 145, 127(2) and 316(2). The applicant pleaded innocence, …

HOSIYAR SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Hosiyar Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 4 September 2014, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11 October 2018, and the entire proceedings of State of U.P. v. Hosiyar Singh (Case No. …

SHESHNATH RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sheshnath Rajbhar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault with an axe. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR and medical report were inconsistent and that no specific role was attributed to him. The …

CHHAVI NATHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhavi Nath, who is accused in Crime No. 228 of 2022 for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 325, 323, 504, 506 and 304, including murder. The prosecution alleges that the accused and co‑accused attacked the deceased and other persons, …

UPKAR ALIAS JHALAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Upkar alias Jhalak in Criminal Case No. 772 of 2026, where the FIR dated 15‑07‑2026 described an assault on four persons but did not name the applicant. The applicant argued that he was not mentioned in the FIR, that his identification was made …

KARAN SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Karan Saini applied for bail in a case involving alleged assault under several IPC sections, claiming false implication and that the injuries were minor except one grievous fracture. The informant alleged that the accused and others assaulted them with an iron rod and a sharp-edged …

RAJA RAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants Raja Ram and another appealed against the order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhadohi‑Gyanpur, which rejected their discharge application in a case under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention …

JUGGALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 110, 351(3), 352 and 115(2) of the IPC, fearing arrest. The State opposed, arguing the application was not maintainable because none of the alleged offences attracted a …

MOHD KALAM AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Kalam and four others, were charged under Sections 191(1), 115(2), 352 and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code in a criminal case filed by the State of U.P. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the summoning …

ASHOK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Ashok Yadav, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 385 of 2026) alleging assault with an iron rod that allegedly caused injuries, including eye damage, to the victim Amrendra. The applicant claimed false implication and argued that the injuries were not of a magnitude to …

ARJUN YADAV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Sessions Judge rejected the revisionists' application for discharge and proceeded to frame a charge under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code in a case involving assault with lathi, danda and axe that caused serious injuries. The revisionists contended that the investigating officer, after …

RIZWAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quashment of criminal proceedings after reaching an amicable settlement with the respondents. The trial court verified the compromise on 2 June 2026, and both parties, including the State, did not contest the settlement. …

NASIM AHMEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Nasim Ahmed, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to conclude the pending Session Trial No. 408 of 2019 (State vs. Abdul Mazid and others), which involves offences under Sections 498A, 304‑B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …

SAROJ KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 02-06-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State's A.G.A. and the …

RAJ KUMAR GAUTAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by two applicants in a 2017 case involving offences under Sections 323, 354(D), 392, 427, 436, 452 and 504 IPC. Applicant No.1 was denied bail because he has a history of eight criminal cases, seven of which were disclosed, indicating …

IRFANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Irfan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0095 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 331(4), 305(a), 317(2) and 112(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed absolute innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR, no incriminating material was found on him, and that the …

ADITYA SINGH DHAMA @ ADITYA DHAMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Aditya Singh Dhama, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case pending under Section 420 IPC. The Additional Government Advocate objected, arguing that the alleged offence does not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, a chargesheet has already …

TEJVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tejveer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a 2001 case involving multiple IPC offences. He claimed false implication, lack of specific role, and cooperation with the trial, noting his age (61) and no prior convictions despite three pending cases. …

BABLI URF BABLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Babli Urf Bablu in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only evidence against her was …

PUSHPENDRA SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists challenged the Sessions Judge’s orders rejecting their discharge application and framing charges of attempt to commit culpable homicide (Sec. 110 BNS) and related offences. They argued that the injuries were simple, not grievous, and that a separate FIR lodged by a victim undermined …

DHEERAJ KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dheeraj Kumar Mishra, a manager of Indostar Capital Finance Ltd., sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging offences under several IPC sections related to misappropriation of funds for a second‑hand vehicle purchase. He contended that his role was …

MUKUL DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 3 OTHERS

Mukul Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 481 of 2020, which involved charges under IPC Section 376-D and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The application was presented before the High Court …

SHARIK AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Sharik and Smt. Bhuri, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case (Crime No.336/2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 506 and 368 IPC, fearing arrest after a charge‑sheet was filed. They had earlier been granted anticipatory bail during the investigation …

NAGINA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Nagina Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 that registered a case under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of the Passport Act. The petition sought quashing of the FIR on the ground that it did not disclose a cognizable …

PRASHANT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Prashant Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC, fearing arrest in a case alleging that he and others promised public employment in exchange for money. He contended that the FIR was false, filed after a long delay, and that no such employment could …

SONVEER @ SOHANVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sonveer @ Sohanveer, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) alleging forgery of a sale deed and several offences under the Indian Penal Code, including sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 191(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2). He claimed absolute innocence, arguing that the …

SHRIPAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case where they were charged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. Act. They contended that the charge under Section 118(2) was unwarranted because the injuries sustained were not grievous, and that …

RAGHUNANDANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Raghunandan, sought enlargement of bail in a criminal complaint (Case No. 211 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 493, 504 and 506 of the IPC, arising from a dispute with the complainant over a cohabitation‑marriage relationship. The complainant had initially filed an application …

NEERAJ KUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Neeraj Kumar Dubey, an informant, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) FTC CAW, Bhadohi, to expedite the trial of criminal case No. 2249/2015 (crime No. 207/2015) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406, 354, 316 IPC …

TANNU SINGH @ ROSHNI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tannu Singh, was charged under several IPC sections in a criminal case and filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devendra Singh, who was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 342 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a forged sale deed. The applicant claimed …

KANHAIYA LAL @ LALLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya Lal @ Lallu, who was arrested in a case involving alleged assault and the death of the informant's wife. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR contained only vague allegations against him, with no corroborative …

JITENDRA @ JITUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra @ Jitu, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 18‑08‑2026 that dismissed his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application to recall witnesses PW‑1 and PW‑2 in a murder trial (IPC §§302, 34). He further …

DILEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO case. The applicant contended that the NBW was issued without first serving a summons or a bailable …

KUSUM DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Kusum Devi, filed a transfer application seeking to move a criminal case (Crime No.101 of 2025) from Varanasi to Jaunpur on the ground of threat to her safety as complainant. The court noted that the case involves offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …

ARUN CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Arun Chauhan, appealed against the order of the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) that issued a non‑bailable warrant after he failed to appear in the trial for nine years. He claimed that a prior criminal miscellaneous writ petition dated 28‑09‑2016 had protected him from arrest and that he …

ABDUL JABBAR SIDDIQUI @ ABDUL JABBARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Abdul Jabbar Siddiqui applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Prevention of Corruption Act, where the alleged conduct occurred in 1999 but the FIR was lodged only in 2009. The applicant argued that there was no need for custodial …

JANARDAN YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Janardan Yadav and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 1 September 2025, the cognizance order dated 29 October 2025, and the entire proceedings of case 7719 of 2025, which arose from alleged offences under Sections …

SMT SAPNA KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, wife of the accused, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide the pending dowry‑prohibition case (State v. Diamond Kumar) expeditiously, alleging that the accused were not appearing despite issuance of …

ADNAN SHAKIL @ SAFAR SHEKH @ RAJAB SAHABversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Adnan Shakil, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 8 August 2025 that had been issued after he allegedly missed court dates despite having been granted bail. The High Court examined the record and …

AAS MOHAMMAD ALIAS AASHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aas Mohammad Alias Aashu, who was arrested in a case under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft of a motorcycle. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserted that his name was added later in the …

AMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Amit Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial of case No. 121 of 2023 (Computer No. 28027 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 323, 324 and 504 of the IPC. He argued that he was …

RAJKUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rajkumar filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in FIR No. 8151/2020 alleging offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. He claimed innocence and asserted that the charges were filed with malice, and offered to cooperate with the investigation. …

SUNIL AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07-03-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State’s A.G.A. and the …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 8 June 2026 that had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application in a criminal trial involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 504 and 506 of …

LOVKUSH PATEL ALIAS TOOFANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Lovkush Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead file a regular bail application before …

CHANDRADEO YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 17-10-2006 and the related proceedings in S.S.T. No.12 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 420, 471, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. …

SHASHI PRAKASH @ VINEET KUMAR TIWARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑08‑2023 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 24‑04‑2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Ghatampur, in a criminal case under IPC sections 323 and 504. The applicants later limited their …

AMIT KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The applicant, Amit Kumar Pandey, an informant in State Vs. Gulab Giri (Session Trial No. 109 of 2026), sought a direction from the High Court to compel the trial court to conclude the case within the stipulated period, citing non‑appearance of accused despite issuance of bailable and non‑bailable …

RAJU SHAH @ LAHEEKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Raju Shah, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 141 of 2026) under IPC sections 309(6) and 317(2) and has been in custody since August 5, 2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that the only items recovered from him belonged to …

AMARJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amarjeet Singh, a bank branch manager, who was charged under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for alleged misappropriation of Rs.1,00,000 in a fixed‑deposit transaction. The applicant asserted that the amount had been …

KHALIL AHMAD AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 393 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC, sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act and sections 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on …

SHAILESH SINGH @ SHAILU SENGARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Shailesh Singh applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 185 of 2026) involving alleged assault with a kulhari, iron rod and a country‑made pistol, resulting in six injuries, one of which was grievous. The FIR was lodged two years after the incident, and the applicant claimed political …

ROHIT NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Nishad, who was arrested in connection with a snatching case (Crime No. 109 of 2026) under sections 309(4), 351(3), 317(2), 317(4) and 317(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, alleged false …

AMARJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 32948 of 2026 filed by Amarjeet Singh, who is accused in Crime No. 546 of 2023 under IPC sections 409, 120B, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that a Rs 10 lakh transfer alleged to be part of a …

RAMU AHIRWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ramu Ahirwar, a Panchayat Secretary, was implicated in a case alleging forged signatures of a Village Pradhan to withdraw Rs. 5,43,747, leading to a charge sheet under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 409 of the IPC. The applicant sought anticipatory bail, contending that an inquiry found the …

LEELADHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Leeladhar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 19 August 2026 passed in Session Trial No. 240 of 2019, which had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application. The High Court observed that the application …

AKHILESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Akhilesh Kumar, accused under sections 64(2)(m), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged obscene video and related offences. The investigating officer admitted that no obscene video was found on the accused's mobile, and …

SANTOSH KUMAR MITTALversusSTATE OF U.P.

Santosh Kumar Mittal applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a rape case where the complainant, a 49‑year‑old woman, alleged sexual assault based on a broken promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual and lasted six years, and that the FIR was …

RAJNEESH MISHRA ALIAS VIKAS MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajneesh Mishra (alias Vikas Mishra) in a criminal case involving alleged rape, sections 64, 351(3) BNS and 67 of the IT Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations stemmed from a consensual …

HUZAIFAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Huzaifa, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 24‑01‑2016 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar, in Criminal Case No. 724 of 2016. The warrant arose from charges under several IPC sections (147, 148, …

VIKRANT PRASAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vikrant Prasad and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No. 781 of 2023) arising from a 2020 case involving multiple IPC offences and the POCSO Act. The application …

MODEBE OOKPO JOSEPHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Modebe Ookpo Joseph applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 70 of 2024) where he is charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B, 201 and IT Act section 66. The High Court examined the facts, the evidence, and noted that a co‑accused, Sunday Okonkwo, had already been released on …

SUNIL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Singh, accused in a case under Sections 118(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting two brothers with a kulhari and exhorting co‑accused to kill them. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the serious …

SURAJ KALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Suraj Kali, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was implicated in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 205 of 2026) under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the IPC, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that the allegations were vague, that there was no …

SONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Yadav, who was arrested in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 110 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR listed seven accused without assigning a specific role to him …

GULFAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from a case under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, the D.P. Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, on the ground that the parties had …

RAHUL SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking dismissal of criminal proceedings arising from case No. 69822/2024, which involved alleged offences under Sections 380, 427, 454, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 5 of the Arms …

GAUTAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gautam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging a charge sheet dated 26‑07‑2023 that alleged offences under Section 420 IPC, the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Act and the Information Technology Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that no …

AMITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Amit, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.306 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences and a provision of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The High Court examined the facts, the applicant’s clean record, and the fact that co‑accused Rambabu @ Pappu and Abhishek had …

VINODversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The accused Vinod applied for bail in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 131, 118(1), 351(3) and 109(1) IPC arising from a family dispute that led to a cross‑fight on 1 August 2026, injuring both parties. The FIR was lodged by the informant, who is the wife of the accused’s …

ASHISH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ashish and Ajay applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 306 of 2026, which involved offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicants argued that bail could not be granted in other pending cases concerning the same alleged offence. …

DEEPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Deepi, was arrested on 7 February 2026 in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3) and 326(g) at Sajeti police station, Kanpur Nagar. He claimed that the FIR and charge sheet were filed with mala‑fide intent to harass him and his family, and that the …

HARIKESH LODHI @ KHARKHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Harikesh Lodhi @ Kharkhar, who was charged under several IPC sections for an alleged assault that resulted in the death of a victim. The applicant argued that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's case and that the allegations …

ROSHAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Roshan Yadav, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 219 of 2026) alleging assault with an iron rod that resulted in serious injuries, including a claimed linear fracture of the left temporal bone. He contended that the FIR was filed belatedly, that the medical evidence was …

MAHESH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Appeal No. 57/2022 arising from FIR No. 53/2021) and the order dated 05.01.2022 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra. The applicants contended that no offence was made out against …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Ajay applied for bail in criminal case No. 229 of 2026, charged under Section 137(2) for alleged enticement of a 17‑year‑old girl. The FIR was lodged by the victim’s father on the same day the girl left home, but the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated that …

DWARIKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Dwarika and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 05‑01‑2022 passed by the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate that stayed the criminal proceedings against them. The High Court examined the allegations, which disclosed …

SATYAVEER AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Satyaveer and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 07‑09‑2012 and all proceedings in Sessions Case No. 149 of 2024, alleging that they had reached a compromise with the State, which was verified by the trial court. The …

NISHA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nisha and four others, filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 02‑09‑2026 under IPC sections 351(2), 49 and 303(2) and protection from arrest. They also prayed that the police follow the arrest guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of …

VINEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vineet applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 191 of 2025) arising from an FIR dated 07.05.2025 filed by the victim's mother alleging enticement. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, testified that she visited a friend's house of her own volition and does not know the …

VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Vishal was arrested in connection with FIR No. 316 of 2026 alleging enticement, filed by the victim's mother. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated a consensual relationship with the applicant, denying any enticement or sexual intercourse. The …

BHAGWAN DAS SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a chargesheet and the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1977 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They claimed they were falsely …

UMARESH @ NETA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants, Umaresh alias Neta and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case involving offences under Sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. They …

SANJU JAISWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sanju Jaiswar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0031 of 2023) where he is charged under IPC sections 363, 364A, 302 and 201. His first bail application was rejected on 8 July 2025. In the second application, the court noted that a co‑accused, Vikas Singh Patel, had already been released …

MEENA KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Meena Kumari applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0249 of 2026) involving sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3), 352 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. She claimed she was falsely implicated based on a co‑accused’s statement and that the FIR was lodged by the injured’s daughter against …

SANJAY SINGH DHAKREY AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sanjay Singh Dhakrey and eight others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR No. 459/2026 dated 7‑September‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested under various IPC and B.N.S. sections. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court …

RAMESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ramesh Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 31.12.2024 in a case under Sections 406 and 506 IPC and to stay his arrest. He prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar when making any arrest. The …

PRIYANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Priyanshu, accused in FIR dated 17.03.2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 BNS for alleged enticement, applied for bail while the trial is pending. He contended that the FIR was false and that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC shows a consensual relationship with no sexual …

ADALAT SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Adalat Sharma and Shiv Kumari, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging their involvement in the suicide of a relative under Sections 85 and 108 of the BNS Act, with the prosecution charging them under Section 306 IPC. They argued that the FIR was filed after an unexplained delay, …

SMT GEETA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Geeta Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction that the police conduct a fair and impartial investigation into a case (Crime No. 547 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal …

BITTU ALIAS ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. challenging a trial court order that rejected his request, under Section 348 B.N.S.S. and Section 311 Cr.P.C., to summon prosecution witness P.W.13 for further cross‑examination. The applicant argued that certain questions remained …

AJIT SINGH BANSAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summons dated 08.07.2026 issued by the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, F.T.C., Ghaziabad in Complaint Case No.42088 of 2025. They contended that the summons under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) B.N.S.S. was issued …

RAMREETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramreet, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 53 of 2026) involving alleged assault on the informant’s father and grandfather, the latter dying from head injuries. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that …

YUSUF AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Yusuf and another, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking discharge of the accused, asserting that the dispute with the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent had been amicably settled and a compromise was filed. The trial court verified the compromise on …

SATISH JAYSAVALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Satish Jayswal, applied for bail in a case arising from a road‑traffic accident alleged to have caused grievous injuries under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 109 of the IPC. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged by a relative with whom he has a dispute, …

KAMLESH MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Kamlesh Maurya filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash an order dated 5 September 2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge under the POCSO Act in a case involving alleged offences of rape, kidnapping and …

VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vishal, the brother‑in‑law of the alleged victim, was arrested in a case (Crime No. 181 of 2026) alleging that he and his father disrobed the victim and attempted rape during a property dispute. The victim and her husband, who is also a witness, later testified that the incident was a scuffle …

VISHAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Vishal Singh, who was accused of rape under Sections 69, 352 and 351(3) IPC. The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a broken consensual relationship of eight years, and asserted innocence. The …

RAMSHANKAR @ BIYAJUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramshankar @ Biyaju, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 120B, 366, 323, 504, 506 and 376D of the IPC. The FIR alleged that the applicant had assisted a co‑accused in kidnapping the victim, but the victim’s …

UMANAND UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Umanand Upadhyay, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging theft of a cheque payment register, forgery and criminal breach of trust. The key issue was whether officers of a cooperative …

AKASHversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Akash appealed against the order of the Special Judge dated 17.08.2026 in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act alleging rape, video recording and other offences. The FIR alleged that the appellant had lured and assaulted the victim, a 21‑year‑old …

PARVEZ @ KALAversusSTATE OF U.P., THROUGH ITS HOME SECRETARY U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Parvez @ Kala, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 31‑07‑2024 and to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑06‑2024 in a Sessions trial involving offences under IPC Section 307, the Prevention of Cow Slaughter …

AWADHESH YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 07-09-2024 and the cognizance order dated 23-09-2024 in case No. 5709 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 147, 392 and 325 of the IPC. They …

VEER SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 09-03-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …

CHANDRA BHUSHAN TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chandra Bhushan Tripathi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge-sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh. He did not wish to contest the merits but requested liberty to file a …

RANJEETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1015 of 2022, which arose from charges under Sections 323, 406, 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant alleged that the prosecution was instituted with a mala fide …

HARENDRA CHAURASIYA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and proceedings in a case under Sections 323 and 504 IPC, alleging that these offences are non‑cognizable. They argued that, per the Explanation to Section 2(d) of the CrPC, a police report …

GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Gautam applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 674 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 of the IPC and Sections 4, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated after the informant, Sabir Ali, added his name eight days …

AMAR BAHADURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amar Bahadur, who is charged with offences under Sections 452 and 376 of the IPC and Sections 66E and 67 of the Income Tax Act for an alleged rape of his aunt, a married …

AMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Amit Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 77 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 498-A, 304-B and the Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. This was his second bail application, the first having been rejected on 26.08.2025. The applicant's counsel submitted a second …

SHRI AVINASH KASHINATH KADAM .versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Abated

The appellant, Shri Avinash Kashinath Kadam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for an offence under Section 332 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to three months’ rigorous imprisonment. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died on 4 February 2021, as …

ASHFAQ KHAN SHARIF KHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Abated

The appellant, Ashfaq Khan Sharif Khan Pathan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for assault causing hurt under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to a fine of Rs.5,000 with default imprisonment of three months. While the appeal was pending, the appellant …

SHRI VAHID SHAMSUDDIN SONDE .versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Abated

The appellant, Vahid Shamsuddin Sonde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag, for offences under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376 and for an offence under Section 3(1)(xii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, receiving rigorous imprisonment …

KRISHNA NARAYAN TIWARI AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Krishna Narayan Tiwari and Antima Krishna Narayan Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with CR No.342 of 2024, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the IT Act, including extortion, blackmail, and threats. The …

MRS SANJEEVANI NILESH PATANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, Krishna Narayan Tiwari and Antima Krishna Narayan Tiwari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with CR No.342 of 2024, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the IT Act, including extortion, blackmail, and threats. The …

MOHAMMAD MOSIN YASIN SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mohammad Mosin Yasin Shaikh, was charged with offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged sexual assault, cruelty, and dowry harassment against his wife and her seven‑year‑old son. The FIR was lodged almost ten months after the alleged incidents, and the …

HANIF ABDUL GAFUR KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Hanif Abdul Gafur Khan was arrested for allegedly possessing 11 bottles of codeine phosphate cough syrup, an offence under Sections 8(c), 20(b), 22(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act. He has been in custody for over a year, the charge has not yet been framed and the trial court is vacant, raising concerns of …

SHEKHAR @ CHANDRASHEKHAR JAGANNATH BHOSALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed by Shekhar Bhosale and by Bhausaheb and Laxmi Kamble in connection with offences under Sections 108, 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicants claimed they were not present at the alleged assault on …

BHAUSAHEB DATTOBA KAMBLE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed by Shekhar Bhosale and by Bhausaheb and Laxmi Kamble in connection with offences under Sections 108, 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicants claimed they were not present at the alleged assault on …

MADHURI DATTATRYA THAKAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Madhuri Dattatraya Thakare, accused of offences under Sections 302, 201, 120(b) and 34 of the IPC, applied for enlargement of bail after being in custody for three years and six months. The trial is ongoing with only four of about twenty‑five prosecution witnesses examined, and the case against her …

SUSHANT NARAYAN ARUDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the CrPC by Sushant Narayan Arude, who is the sole accused in a murder case (IPC Section 302) arising from a dispute over premises with the deceased victim. The accused had been in custody for three years and nine months without …

JITENDRA MANOHAR BALLADKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (C.R. No.122 of 2024) alleging cheating under IPC sections 406, 409, 420 read with 34 and a violation of Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of …

SADIQUE ABDUL KARIM SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sadique Abdul Karim Shaikh, aged 60, is accused No.2 in CR No.405 of 2023 for offences including murder, attempt to murder, assault and conspiracy, arising from a dispute that escalated with weapons. The prosecution alleges he used an iron rod to assault the victim, but the rod was …

KETAN ASHOK VARADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ketan Ashok Varade, who had been incarcerated for over three years for alleged involvement in a violent incident involving multiple IPC offences and violations of …

PARAMENDRA @ GAURAV RAJENDRA SINHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Paramendra @ Gaurav Rajendra Sinha, who had been in custody for 7 years and 3 months for offences under IPC sections 396 and 120B, the Arms Act, and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. The State opposed bail, citing the gravity …

GAURAV DILIP JAGTAPversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Gaurav Dilip Jagtap, who had been incarcerated for four years in connection with a procession‑related violent incident. The charges included several serious offences under …

UJJWALA TARACHAND DESARDAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered the bail application of Ujjwala Tarachand Desarda, a director of a company charged under multiple IPC offences (sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B read with 34) and sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) …

JUVENILE XXXversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, a juvenile aged 16 years, was charged under IPC sections 363, 364 and 506 for the alleged abduction and attempted murder of the informant's minor daughter, based largely on an alleged extra‑judicial confession; the victim was never recovered. The trial court denied bail, but the …

KUNWAR VIKASH SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kunwar Vikash Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 19‑04‑2019 and the criminal proceedings in Case No. 419 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 377 of the IPC and Sections …

NARENDRA PAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑06‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 772 of 2026 arising from FIR under Section 352. The High Court …

SMT. BIMLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, Smt. Bimla, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bijnor, in Sessions Trial No. 209 of 1983 for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. She filed a criminal appeal (No. 1278 of 1989) before the Allahabad High Court …

DEVENDRA AND ANOTHERSversusSTATE

The appellants were convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia. They filed a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence. During the pendency of the appeal, appellants No.1, 2 and 4 …

HARSHIT RAJ SANGAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summoning order and charge‑sheet in a criminal case involving sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the pendency of the petition, the parties engaged in mediation, …

RIZWAN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance order and charge‑sheet in a criminal case (Criminal Case No.2477/2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the …

JAI KISHAN AGARWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 04‑12‑2025 under IPC sections 85, 115(2) BNS and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, and a mandamus restraining their arrest. Both parties submitted that the dispute had been amicably settled through a …

JITENDRA KASHYAPversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Kashyap, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet filed under Sections 323, 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a dowry harassment case. The marriage …

TAUFIK AHMAD @ TAUFIK AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash FIR No. 0074 of 2026 and a mandamus to prevent further arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been settled through a mediation and conciliation agreement dated 27.06.2026. Both parties, including …

GAJENDRA SINGH TEOTIA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Gajendra Singh Teotia and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 24.01.2026 and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest them. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal …

CHETAN AGARWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Chetan Agarwal and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 04.12.2025 under IPC sections 85 and 115(2) BNS and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, and a mandamus restraining their arrest. The parties had earlier settled the dispute …

AKHIL KUMAR YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04‑08‑2023 and the criminal proceedings (Case No. 10013 of 2023) arising from a dowry dispute under sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 420, 494 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry …

MUKESH DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mukesh Dubey, accused of murder under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2), 3(5) and 61(2)Ka BNS. The applicant claimed the death of his wife was a suicide by aluminum phosphide, citing an inconclusive post‑mortem and a delayed, unreliable statement from …

RAJDEEP RAJAWATversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Rajdeep Rajawat, who is charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abducting a victim and firing at him. The first bail plea was denied, but the applicant argued that the primary witness and the victim have …

MOHD ASAD @ ASAAD @ KALIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Mohd Asad @ Asaad @ Kaliya, who is charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 120B, 147, 148, 149, 286, 307, 386, 504 and 506. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Mohd Faizan, in a similarly placed case …

RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered four related bail appeals filed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by Rakesh Kumar, Vipin, Aman Kumar @ Tagharu and Rajendra Tiwari, who were accused of assaulting Kuldeep, who later died. The FIR was …

MOHAMMAD WASIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohammad Wasi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge-sheet and non‑bailable warrant in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and 313 of the IPC and the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed innocence and alleged that …

VISHVANATH PANDEY AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vishvanath Pandey and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 79 of 2017) relating to offences under Sections 147, 344, 347 and 506 IPC. They relied …

IRFAN ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Irfan Ali, filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Earlier, his first anticipatory bail application was withdrawn with a direction to surrender, but he failed to …

INSAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Insad Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12.05.2026 and a writ of mandamus to restrain his arrest under various IPC sections. The petition was filed in the Allahabad High Court. The State and other respondents submitted that …

RAM UJAGIR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ram Ujagir Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑03‑2025, the cognizance order dated 28‑05‑2025, and the entire proceedings of case No.17441 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 420, 471, 419 and …

ANUJ @ SANTOSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anuj Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 1185 of 2020, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had entered into a compromise on 6 November …

PRITI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 15‑07‑2017, the cognizance and summoning order dated 12‑04‑2019, and the entire proceedings of State Vs. Rajesh @ Tuntun (Case No. 2279 of 2019) relating to offences under …

VIKRAM SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Vikram Sharma applied for a re‑issue of his passport but the Regional Passport Officer raised objections on the ground that two criminal matters—one under the IPC and SC/ST Act and another under the Public Gambling Act—were pending and allegedly suppressed. Sharma submitted affidavits claiming …

WASEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Waseem was arrested in connection with Crime No.10 of 2026 under Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 27 of the Arms Act for alleged possession of a country-made pistol and recovered ornaments. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the recovery was fabricated, …

ANIL @ BHAGWATI SHARAN DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

An application under Section 528 CrPC was filed by Anil @ Bhagwati Sharan Dwivedi seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State vs Vishnu Kant (Case No. 2418 of 2019) which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal …

SHIVAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 14‑07‑2025, the cognizance order dated 17‑11‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 388 of 2025 (State vs. Subodh Kumar and Others) arising from Crime No. 146 of 2025. …

RIHAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Rihan Khan, who is charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and Section 38 of the Aadhaar Act for an alleged fraud involving a Rs.2,000 transfer. The applicant pleaded innocence, described the allegations as petty, and pointed to a history of …

RAJKAPOOR GIHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rajkapoor Gihar, was injured in a police firing cross‑fire and is charged under Section 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial (Case Crime No. 167 of 2026). The court …

SANJU @ SANJEEV CHATURVEDI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑11‑2020, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09‑12‑2020, and the entire Session proceedings (Case No. 770 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 392 and 411 IPC. …

NARESH SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petition was filed by Naresh Singh, who was the Chowki In‑charge, challenging a tribunal order that had upheld a charge of negligence for failing to prevent a second explosion of seized explosives. On 7 November 2023 a large quantity of illegal firecrackers and related materials were seized from …

AVADHESH SHARMA @ AVADHESH KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Avadhesh Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 534 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504, 323 and 307 IPC. He contended that the allegations were vague, the injuries were minor, he had cooperated with the …

VIJAY PAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (ST No.1935 of 2024) arising from Crime No.455 of 2020, which involved offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …

AJAY KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ajay Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet and proceedings relating to offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …

MUKHBIR SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 2059 of 2013) filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh under IPC sections 498-A, 323 and 504. The parties had entered into a compromise on 10 July 2024, which was …

ARSHAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 452, 352, 323 and 506 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Additional Chief …

AYYUB AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicants, Ayyub and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 10457/22) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 352, 323 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the …

ZUNAID SAIFIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Zunaid Saifi, was arrested on 12 June 2026 and remanded in judicial custody until 19 June 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 31 March 2021 alleging offences under Section 66-C of the Information Technology Act, 2008 and Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. …

ANIKET ARYA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 336 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification report confirming the settlement was filed. …

PRAHALAD AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑01‑2025, the cognizance order dated 13‑11‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No.62 of 2025) arising from Crime No.497 of 2024. Both parties had amicably …

KULDEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kuldeep Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 2718 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification …

ANITA SRIVASTAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anita Srivastav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 32 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified before the …

DEEPU PAL @ DEEPAK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 131, 115(2), 352 and 117(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified …

VINOD JAISWAL @ VINOD KUMAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vinod Jaiswal, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash orders dated 07.07.2026 and 14.07.2026 passed by the Gram Nyayalaya, Kerakat, on a criminal case (Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC) alleging that the prosecution had failed to produce its key witness, Dr. A.P. Singh, …

BHAGWAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Case No. 46 of 2026 arising from Crime No. 136 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 281 and 106 (non‑compoundable). The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a …

RAJAT AGRAHARI @ KALLAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No.15564 of 2024, which involved non‑compoundable offences under Sections 379, 504, 506, 427 and 384 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, a compromise that was verified by the Chief …

BHANU PRAKASH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 7748 of 2026) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an …

SHIVAM KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shivam Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 52096 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 281, 125A and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the …

GAURAV SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second anticipatory bail application filed by Gaurav Singh after a chargesheet was lodged under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim, who was 22 days short of turning 18, had not implicated him in any assault and …

RAJENDRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 13‑12‑2016 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 308 and 325 IPC. The court noted that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was …

SHIVAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Shivam filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.125 of 2021) pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Bareilly, which involved offences under IPC sections 308, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 325. Both parties had reached a compromise on …

DHANPAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and subsequent proceedings relating to offences under Sections 323, 325, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise which was verified by the …

BHOPAN URF LALCHANDRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 17‑05‑2008 and related proceedings (Case No.313 of 2009) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 452 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable …

KADEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kadeer, who is named in an FIR for murder under Sections 191(2), 190, 103(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed the allegations were false, pointing to a post‑mortem report that showed a single head injury and no direct …

MEERA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Meera Devi filed a criminal appeal under Section 413 of the BNSS Act challenging the acquittal of two accused (Pushpa Devi and Arun alias Kallu) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah, in a murder case arising from the death of her husband, Anil Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the accused …

SIRAJUDDIN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.310 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 333, 192(2), 115(2), 351(3), 110 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had already reached an amicable …

TEJA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Teja Pandey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑05‑2022 in State v. Teja Pandey, a case involving offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which …

RAM VILASH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Ram Vilash Yadav in connection with a case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant, through counsel Satish Chandra Singh, sought anticipatory bail but later requested …

AKSHAY CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Akshay Chaudhary applied for bail in a criminal case involving multiple offences under the IPC, the Banking and Negotiable Instruments Act and the Income Tax Act. He argued that a co‑accused, Ashwani Jadaun, with an identical role and no prior record had been granted bail, and therefore parity …

BHOLA RAJBHAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhola Rajbhar and Rajesh Rajbhar in a case under Sections 105 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging they assaulted an informant’s son who later died of hemorrhagic shock. The applicants claimed false implication, absence of any weapon, lack …

MUNIB ANSARI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an urgent application under Section 528 of the CrPC filed by Munib Ansari and six others seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 493 of 2011 (State vs. Munib Ansari et al.) relating to offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 504 IPC. The applicants had …

RAMASHRAY YADAV @ RAMASHRAY SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramashray Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. During the hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application …