Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17312 judgments · newest first · showing 1601–1800
The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant, represented by Satish Chandra Singh, sought anticipatory bail but later requested to withdraw the application and …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 34 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Mediation and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 706 of 2016) relating to offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 452, 323, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 19‑01‑2005 and related proceedings (Case No.1628 of 2005) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 353, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.2911 of 2026) arising from a 2016 offence under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was recorded by the Chief Judicial Magistrate on …
The High Court disposed of two connected bail applications filed by Rohit and Suneel @ Girdhari, who were named in an FIR for murder under Sections 103(1) and 238(K) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants argued that the case is based solely on circumstantial evidence, that the alleged application …
An application under Section 528 of the CrPC was filed by Alam and two others seeking to quash criminal case No. 975 of 2024, which arose from Crime No. 146 of 2023 and alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 323 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, a compromise verification …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 28‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 55062, which alleged offences under Sections 504, 406 and 420 IPC. The applicants contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑09‑2024, the cognizance order dated 06‑08‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 1054 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 281, 115 and 351 of the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Gulzar, accused in Criminal Case No. 451 of 2026 under Sections 61(2)Ka, 310(2), 311, 317(3), 317(5) and 336(2) of the IPC. The applicant asserted that he is innocent, was not named in the FIR and was implicated only through the …
Shailendra Kumar Verma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case where he was accused of forging documents to transfer title of property belonging to his sister (the informant). The prosecution alleged that the applicant illegally obtained the title …
The applicant, Chandra Bhan Yadav, was charge-sheeted for offences under IPC sections 424, 467, 468 and 471. He had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 528 of the CrPC (BNSS No.24850 of 2025), which the High Court dismissed, terminating the interim relief previously granted. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 08‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning orders, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 09 of 2026 arising from FIR Crime No. 332 of 2025. The High Court examined the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mahendra Pal under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No. 347 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 352, 109(1) and 351(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S. application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order dated 15 July 2025 in Criminal Case No. 12081, alleging that they were charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) B.N.S. which, according to Supreme Court precedent, cannot be invoked …
Ram Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑09‑2013, the cognizance order of 05‑05‑2015 and the non‑bailable warrant of 14‑07‑2026, along with the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.1539 of 2016) instituted …
Kulwant Singh, an employee of the Defence Research and Development Organisation, was arrested in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) arising from a matrimonial dispute involving the informant's daughter. He applied for bail, claiming absolute innocence …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC for Sabir, who was implicated in a NDPS case involving 100 grams of heroin, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicant argued that the FIR was fabricated and highlighted his lack of prior …
Manju (Phoolwati) applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0162 of 2026) where she is charged under several IPC sections and sections 17 and 18 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, alleged to have trafficked a woman and sold her for Rs. 1 lakh. The applicant claimed …
Petitioner Sonu filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0563 of 2022) under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC was pending …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nishant, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 220 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(3), 118(1), 118(2) and 324(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 20‑06‑2021 and a cognizance order dated 28‑10‑2021 in a case pending under Sections 188 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that these offences are …
Petitioner Chandrajeet Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to complete the investigation of an FIR dated 25.09.2025 and to arrest accused persons. The State argued that the investigation was completed and a charge sheet had been filed only against one accused, with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sudhakar and Surendra Bind, who were arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 92 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and criminal conspiracy. The applicants claimed …
Ramesh filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (case no. 55514 of 2026) arising from a FIR under IPC sections 115(2), 333, 352, 351(2) and Section 110. The High Court examined the record and held that no ground existed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3185 of 2023, which involved charges under sections 323, 352, 504, 506, 427, 365, 324 and 308 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Additional Chief …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suhail, who was arrested in a double‑murder case under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. Although Suhail’s name did not appear in the FIR, the informant’s second statement and a later statement by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 115174 of 2023) arising from offences under IPC sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The parties had entered into a compromise on 11‑08‑2026, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from alleged offences under the IPC and D.P. Act, claiming they had reached an amicable compromise with the complainant. The State's Additional Government Advocate …
The applicant, Mohammad Imran, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. The applicant …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Prashant Sharma, who was alleged to be involved in offences under various IPC sections and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed innocence and cited that co‑accused had been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Brijesh Kumar, who was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 279 and 304-A in two related FIRs. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserted that he was falsely implicated as a nominee of the insured, and highlighted his clean …
The applicant, Ashish Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 26‑06‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 8229 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS (equivalent to IPC …
The applicants, Rajendra Singh and two others, were charged in a 1999 case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 470 and 471. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. Subsequently, they sought to withdraw that application and instead file a regular bail petition, …
Mahendra Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Old Case No. 777/9 of 2020, now New Case No. 1422 of 2020) that were instituted under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1678 of 2021, Crime No. 544 of 2021) that alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 377 IPC, Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjay Gautam @ Rahul, who was arrested in a case under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and argued that he was not named in the FIR, with only a weapon, cartridge, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Kushwaha, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 207 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences including sections 79, 75, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 317(2) and 304(2) BNS. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Anash, who was implicated in a rape case arising from a broken consensual relationship where the complainant alleged a false promise of marriage. The applicant asserted his innocence, highlighted the lack of medical evidence, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam @ Shiva @ Krishna, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 313 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318, 115, 127, 308, 351 and 3 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating that his name only …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sudhir in Criminal Case No. 139 of 2026, which is registered under Sections 309(4) and 317(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant asserted that he is innocent, his name having surfaced only in a co‑accused’s confessional statement, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ajay Verma, who was charged under Sections 74, 76, 333 and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged rape. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of medical evidence of assault and contradictions in the victim's statements …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme (BNDS) Act seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.342 of 2025 (State vs. Mukesh Kumar Jain & Others). They argued that the investigating police failed to comply with mandatory provisions of Sections 29 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 34072 of 2024) arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a dowry‑related case (Cr. No. 27610 of 2024) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage between the first …
The applicant, Pramod Kumar Pathak, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summons dated 6 September 2025 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. He contended that no prima facie case existed and …
The applicant Sandeep filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a supplementary charge‑sheet (No. 81‑A/2024) and the cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 4228 of 2025. The charge‑sheet was filed after a second investigation was conducted without the magistrate’s permission under …
The appellant, Prakash G. Bagul, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 890 of 1998 for an offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment. While the appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 593 of 2001) was pending, the …
The applicant, Hitanshu Bhimsen Bagga, sought quashing of FIR No.354/2021 filed for cheating under IPC 420 r/w 34 and Sections 4 and 5 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. The parties had entered into a settlement MOU dated 18 January 2022, wherein the complainant received the full amount …
The applicant, Siddhant @ Shooter Shambhaji Bhosale, was charged in Crime No. 332 of 2023 for offences under Sections 302, 120B and 201 of the IPC, alleged to have conspired to murder the deceased. The prosecution's case is based solely on circumstantial evidence, with no direct proof, CCTV footage, …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The petitioner, Aman Ibrahim Khan, challenged a detention order issued under the Maharashtra (Prevention of Dangerous Activities) Act, 1981, which placed him in Nagpur Central Prison. The order was based on a mixture of past offences, recent violent incidents, and two in‑camera witness statements, …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The petitioners were accused of extortion for collecting donations for a Dussehra festival, leading to FIR No. 360/2011 and a Sessions case. Both parties later agreed to settle the dispute and sought consent quashing of the criminal proceedings. The High Court, invoking its inherent powers under …
The applicants, Pankaj Sunil Bansode and another, entered into a settlement agreement with the complainant, agreeing to bear the educational expenses of the deceased's minor son until graduation. A consent affidavit confirming this arrangement was filed, and the court directed the applicants to file …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The applicants, staff of a regional branch, were charged in an FIR (CR No. 222 of 2024) for offences under sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the IPC. The complainant and the applicants later reconciled, and the money taken from depositors was returned after recovery from an …
The petition arose from a commercial dispute that was settled by a Memorandum of Understanding on 5 May 2026, with the petitioners receiving a final payment of Rs 2.5 crore. Both parties then sought the consent quashing of criminal proceedings (C.R. No. 68 of 2022) relating to offences under …
The applicant, Santosh Maribba Lade, was arrested in connection with a 2019 murder case (IPC Sections 452, 302, 120(B) and 34) and has been in custody for over seven years. The prosecution alleges that he conspired with the victim's son and another accused (A3) to murder the victim. The applicant's …
The petitioners and respondents entered into a settlement MOU dated 15‑12‑2022, acknowledging receipt of amounts and agreeing to quash the criminal proceedings arising from FIR No.153/2021 and the related MPID Special Case. The High Court, invoking its inherent powers under Section 482 of the …
The incident on 27‑12‑2017 in Rajiv Nagar resulted in the deaths of Devidas Ighe and Dinesh Birajdar. Five accused – Ravi Nikalje, Dipak Wavhal, Krushna Shinde, Nitin Pandit and Akash Dambale – were convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC 302 read with Section 149, and also under Sections 143 and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 520 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 of the CrPC) seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1685 of 2025, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471. The underlying civil dispute between the …
Ronaldo T. Fernandes appealed a conviction under Section 489-C of the Indian Penal Code, having been sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment. While on bail, the High Court imposed conditions requiring monthly attendance before the DCP CID and presence at the appeal hearing. The appellant …
The petitioners, husband and in‑laws of the victim, sought to quash an FIR registered under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, alleging assault, forced abortion, financial extortion and misappropriation of …
The petitioners were involved in a factory accident for which they paid statutory compensation and later executed a memorandum of understanding with the victim's family regarding further compensation. The victim’s first informant consented to the settlement, and the parties sought to quash the FIR …
The petitioners – the husband and his in‑laws – were charged under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the IPC for alleged cruelty, assault and dowry‑related offences after the victim filed an FIR in February 2022. The parties later reached an amicable settlement, obtained a …
The applicant, a father and press photographer, was charged under Section 75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for an alleged sexual offence against his minor daughter. The FIR was lodged on 5 July 2026, alleging …
The petition arose from a labour dispute between the petitioners, who run a transportation business, and the Mal Vahatuk Sena Union over loading and unloading work, leading to a complaint of extortion for a demand of ₹1,000. The parties later reconciled and filed a consent affidavit seeking to …
Dr. Rajendra Kanaiyalal Sanghavi, a senior citizen, filed a writ petition challenging a summoning order dated 12 September 2023 that issued process against him under IPC sections 420, 468 and 465 read with 34, based on a complaint by his sister alleging forgery of gift deeds relating to two flats. …
Madhukar R. Bhoir, convicted under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307 and Arms Act section 25(1), appealed his conviction while a passport application remained on hold. He sought a direction from the High Court for the Regional Passport Office, Thane, to consider his passport request despite the …
The appellant, Dhananjay @ Kiran Vinayak Kadam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 376 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. While the appeal was pending, a police report dated 20 August 2026 indicated …
The petitioners, accused Nos. 2 and 3, challenged the appellate order that upheld their conviction for defamation under Section 500 read with Section 34 of the IPC, while setting aside the imprisonment term and increasing the fine. The complainant alleged that the petitioners, together with accused …
In 1987 Anil Phumali was assaulted on a public road by several accused, including Sanjay Bukane and Prabhakar Koli, who allegedly used an iron rod and a sickle, causing incised wounds and amputation of two fingers. The victims and their mother identified the accused, and forensic evidence …
The applicant, convicted for aggravated penetrative sexual assault of an eight‑year‑old girl under Section 376(3) IPC and Section 6 POCSO, filed an interim application seeking suspension of his ten‑year rigorous imprisonment and bail pending his appeal. He argued that the victim’s statement did not …
The appellant, convicted of rape of a minor and criminal intimidation, sought suspension of his ten‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence and bail pending his appeal. He argued that the victim’s testimony contained material discrepancies and that he had already served over two and a half years of the …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by two accused (Ashiqbhai Naayee and Pravinbhai Rabari) charged under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 for alleged involvement in a fixed‑deposit fraud scheme. The …
The petitioners, trustees of the Jaffer Suleman Musafirkhana Trust, challenged a magistrate’s order dated 16‑11‑2009 that issued criminal process against them under several IPC provisions, alleging that the dispute with Respondent No.2 over possession of Room No.1 was purely a civil tenancy matter. …
Nanasaheb Shankarrao Gaikwad, a 75‑year‑old accused, sought regular bail for offences of cheating and forgery under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 34 of the IPC, the Registration Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act. The prosecution alleged that he and family members …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of five writ petitions seeking to quash a criminal FIR and the magistrate’s order directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC. All petitions arose from the same FIR (No.11 of 2022) filed on a complaint by a former KDMC corporator alleging fraud and …
The applicant, originally accused No.4, filed a criminal revision seeking discharge from offences under Sections 120B, 420, 468, 471 of the IPC and Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The revision challenged the order of the CBI Special Judge that had rejected his …
The petitioner, former director and CEO of Kailasa Analytics, was charged under IPC Sections 406 and 409 for the company's failure to deposit statutory Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) contributions for October and November 2017. The company later paid the arrears with interest, but the prosecution …
The applicant, Niraj Rajaram More, was one of seven accused in FIR No.637 of 2023 for assault and related offences arising from a dispute during a Ganesh Visarjan procession. The complainant later filed an affidavit stating he could not identify More and no longer wished to prosecute him, seeking to …
The appellant, convicted of offences under Sections 143, 148, 302, 325 and 452 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, has been in custody for more than ten years while his appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 129 of 2020) remains pending. He applied for bail and suspension of sentence on the ground …
Nanasaheb Shankarrao Gaikwad, a 75‑year‑old accused, sought regular bail for offences of cheating and forgery under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 34 of the IPC, the Registration Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act. The prosecution alleged that he and family members …
The High Court considered an interim application filed by Ganesh Asaram Kale, convicted under IPC Section 376(3) and POCSO Section 4 for raping a 14‑year‑old, seeking suspension of his 20‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence and bail pending appeal. The defence argued that medical evidence showed no …
The appellant was convicted by a Special Judge under Sections 10 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. While Criminal Appeal No. 226 of 2022 was pending, the appellant died on 15 July 2024, as evidenced by a death certificate …
The petition challenged a 29 April 2026 order of the JMFC, Andheri, which granted interim compensation of 20% of a disputed cheque amount to the complainant under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner argued that his detailed reply was ignored, that the complainant was an …
The petitioner, Zohra Shakir Khania, and the complainant (respondent No.2) settled a personal dispute arising from a relationship with the complainant's son and jointly sought consent quashing of FIR No. 262/2018 and related criminal proceedings. The High Court examined its inherent powers under …
The petitioners, trustees of the Jaffer Suleman Musafirkhana Trust, challenged a magistrate's order dated 16‑11‑2009 that issued criminal process against them under various IPC sections for alleged misappropriation of cash and a gas cylinder during the execution of a civil eviction decree. The …
The High Court of Bombay heard a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Puroshottam Gajanan Patankar, who was charged under several IPC sections including 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 472 read with Section 34. The applicant’s relatives …
The petitioner, a teacher employed on probation by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, was terminated on 14 July 2014 following a departmental inquiry that found him guilty of grave misconduct arising from a criminal case in which he was convicted under Sections 506(II), 323, 354 and 363 of …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with serious IPC and POCSO offences. The State argued that the applicant had already been released on bail by the JMFC because the police had not complied with Section 48 …
The applicant, Naushad Ahmed Shaikh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail in connection with FIRs arising from a complaint lodged by a third party. The respondent State, through its counsel, highlighted that …
The appellant, Maqbool Ahmed Mohd. Sharif, was convicted by a Special Judge for penetrative sexual assault of a 15‑year‑old girl and related offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, receiving a 20‑year rigorous imprisonment. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence and …
The appellant, Maqbool Ahmed Mohd. Sharif, was convicted by a Special Judge for penetrative sexual assault of a 15‑year‑old girl and related offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, receiving a 20‑year rigorous imprisonment. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of his sentence and …
The appellant, a school headmaster, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the CrPC seeking registration of an FIR against three teachers alleging casteist slurs and assault. The trial court rejected the application, finding no prima facie cognizable offence and viewing the move as a …
The appellants Raffu and Kallu were convicted for the murder of Yamin under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution alleged that both participated in a quarrel that led to Raffu shooting Yamin, with Kallu allegedly assisting. The High Court examined the evidence and found that …
The appellants Krishna Kumar, Lallu and Suresh were convicted under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting the complainant Badri Prasad and his family members, based on the testimony of two injured eyewitnesses. They were released on probation instead of being sentenced to imprisonment. …
The appellant Bhagwat was accused of raping a nine‑year‑old girl on 5 August 1984; an FIR was lodged the next day and the victim was medically examined, revealing severe genital injuries. The victim, her father, and several eyewitnesses identified Bhagwat, while the medical officer’s report and …
The applicant, Omsaran, filed a bail application in a murder case (Crime No. 544 of 2025) in which he is accused of killing his wife. He contended that he was the informant who lodged the FIR after his wife was assaulted and that the prosecution's case is based solely on suspicion of an illicit …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506, 354, 354‑B of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both the applicants and the second …
The appellants, Abhay Raj and three others, appealed to quash the charge‑sheet and summoning order issued under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and certain provisions of the Indian Penal Code relating to assault. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the …
Mukesh applied for bail in a 1992 case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC. He claimed that his earlier bail in 1994 was terminated because he had to leave the city for livelihood reasons, not because he absconded, and that he has been in custody since March 2024. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Yadav, who is charged under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault leading to death. The applicant argued that the FIR assigns only a general role to all accused, the …
Manoj Yadav and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 03‑09‑2024 in State vs Manoj Yadav case No. 5458 of 2024. The charge sheet alleged offences under Sections 379 and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hemant Rai, who is named in an FIR for murder under Sections 3(5), 103(1), 351(3) of the IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that there was no eye‑witness to the alleged killing and that the only witnesses named the accused …
Mehadi Hassain Shamin applied under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings filed against him under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque of Rs.37,500. The cheque was given to settle a cash loan obtained from the complainant’s wife but was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, accused in a murder case (Criminal Case No. 283 of 2024) under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant argued that the FIR named him only because he was a friend of the prime accused, Arbaz, the husband of the deceased, and that …
The appellant Anku Shakya was charged under IPC sections 376(1) and 506, the POCSO Act sections 3 and 4, and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(2)(5) and 14A(2). The Additional District & Sessions Judge denied bail in Bail Application No. 421 of 2017. The appellant filed a criminal …
The applicants Dilshad and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑06‑2022 and the cognizance order dated 24‑02‑2023, and to stay further proceedings. Although two counsel were listed for the applicants, no one …
The appellant Tinku filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a bail rejection order dated 19 May 2017 in a case involving charges of rape under Section 376 IPC, offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The appeal was …
The appellant Dileep Gaud filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 challenging a bail order dated 26 July 2017 passed by the Special Judge in a case involving offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The State informed the Court that …
The High Court considered the bail application of Udit Sharma, accused under IPC sections 302, 120-B, 34, 420, 467, 468 and 471 for a murder case. The prosecution’s case relied on statements of several witnesses, many of whom were later hostile or did not support the prosecution, and the recording …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Suneel Sagar, husband of a deceased woman, in a criminal case (Crime No. 561 of 2025) involving alleged dowry demands and related offences under the IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that the deceased committed …
The appellant, Sukha Singh, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside a Special Judge's order that denied bail in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120B of the IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of …
Smt Sampat Devi, a licensee of a country liquor shop in Kotra, Jalaun, challenged the cancellation of her licence on the ground that her husband, a history‑sitter, was merely accused in a criminal case. The licensing authority cancelled the licence under Section 34 of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 and …
The appellant Imran appealed against the order of the Special Judge dated 24 March 2026 in a case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking bail. The FIR, lodged on 22 January 2026 by a 40‑year‑old married woman, alleged rape, blackmail and theft, but was filed after an unexplained …
Manish Kumar Gupta appealed to the Allahabad High Court against an order dated 28‑03‑2026 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge that denied him bail in a case under Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant had earlier been granted bail on 09‑03‑2026 by a …
Poonam Devi applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 313, 323, 498A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She claimed innocence and alleged that the charges were false and that she would cooperate with the investigation. …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Azad Khan, who is charged under Sections 302, 147 and 506 of the IPC for a murder‑related offence. The applicant had previously been denied bail and was later declared a juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board, being about 16 years old at …
The appellants were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant and others during a dispute over paddy harvesting. They argued that the summoning order was issued mechanically and that a parallel …
The applicant, Rajat Sahu, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal complaint (M.A. No. 413 of 2023) alleging offences under Section 420 of the IPC and Sections 63/65 of the Copyright Act, which had been ordered to be dismissed by the Special …
The applicant, Jeetu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging an order dated 02‑12‑2024 passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66. The applicant's counsel argued …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the FIR, charge sheet and the entire criminal proceeding (Computer Case No. 37472 of 2026) arising from offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was verified by the …
The applicant, Raheema, was implicated in a case where her husband was found dead, allegedly after an altercation with her. The FIR, lodged nine days after the incident by the mother‑in‑law, accused Raheema of causing the death, which was later treated as a suicide and the charge was upgraded to …
The applicant, Ravi Sahimani, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 141 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 49, 70(2), 74, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sohan Urf Gore, who is charged under several IPC sections for an alleged assault that resulted in one death and three injuries. The prosecution alleged that the applicant participated in the assault, wielding a spear, while co‑accused Vivek used …
The applicant, Seetu alias Banti alias Viresh Kumar, was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code for offences alleged to have occurred in Pehso, Bulandshahr. This was his second bail application; the first, filed on 03‑04‑2025, had been dismissed. Counsel for the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jubair in a criminal case (Crime No.55 of 2025) where he was not named in the FIR but his name appeared in statements of the informant and alleged injured. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had cooperated with the …
The applicant Rakesh Chaurasiya filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Gautam Buddh Nagar, to dispose of criminal case No. 162 of 2026 (arising from crime No. 399 of 2025 …
The applicant, Dharm Singh, lodged an FIR on 13 November 2018 alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The investigating officer filed a charge‑sheet on 29 June 2019 omitting Section 307 and instead including Section 323. The applicant sought, through an application …
Petitioners Payal and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others from interfering in their marital life and directing authorities to provide them protection. The respondents argued that the petitioners are in a live‑in …
The appellant Yogendra Singh Rajput appealed under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act to quash a summoning order dated 29.06.2026 that charged him with offences under Sections 452, 323, 354, 506 IPC and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …
Chhedi alias Shiv Shankar Seth, charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376-D and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6, has been in custody since July 2018. He filed a second bail application, alleging that the FIR was false because the victim was in love with him and the case was fabricated to obtain money, …
The appellants, Laxmi Devi Chauhan and another, appealed against a cognizance and summoning order dated 15‑01‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Agra, under IPC sections 323, 452, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They …
The appellants were summoned by a Special Judge under the SC/ST Act and IPC for allegedly assaulting the complainant and using casteist slurs during a property dispute on 30 March 2024. The appellants contended that the summoning order was passed without proper consideration of contradictory …
The applicants Kamran and others were charged under several IPC sections for assaulting police officers on 19 April 2024. They filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order rejecting their discharge application and the framing of charges. The High Court examined …
Petitioners Ravi @ Ravikant and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 353(3), 74, 85, 89 B.N.S. and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that the FIR was false, malicious …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 918 of 2026) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Mawana, Meerut, where a charge‑sheet had already been filed against them for offences …
Ravindra Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.14 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 123, 303(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the FIR was …
Aniket Pandey Carporal filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No. 1511 of 2023) arising from charges under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 377, 504 and 506. The application was heard before Justice …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Karmveer in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 506, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged after a long delay and …
The petitioners, Dr. Vijay Kumar Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 17 July 2026 that registered a case under Section 304-A IPC for an alleged offence in Robertsganj, Sonbhadra. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a …
The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 3 July 2026 registered under multiple IPC offences (Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506) at Kalan Police Station, Shahjahanpur. He contended that the dispute was civil in nature and that no …
The applicant, Devendra Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 338 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304‑A of the IPC. After hearing arguments, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farman Ahmad, who was arrested in a case registered under IPC sections 64(1), 115(2) and 351(3). The FIR does not allege rape, but the victim’s statement under CrPC sections 180 and 183 accuses the applicant of rape, although the medico‑legal …
Vishal Gupta was arrested in Crime No. 309 of 2026 under IPC sections 69, 352 and 351(2) for allegedly establishing a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage. The victim, a 21‑year‑old woman, recorded a statement under CrPC sections 180 and 183 indicating she was a consenting party and …
The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for a case involving multiple IPC offences (147, 323, 342, 376, 420, 504, 506, 34, 392, 411). He claimed that a prior grant of bail was not acted upon due to a communication gap, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sohil, who is charged under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 352, 64 and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, had given a consensual statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Kanhaiya in a rape case (Crime No. 242 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, citing missed calls from the victim, contradictions in the FIR and …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vishnu Prasad, who was charged with murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and related offences and had been declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence and pledged cooperation, while the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shiva Raikwar, who was charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he had been granted bail earlier but …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pancham Gond (also known as Abhishek Gond) in a murder case (Crime No. 152 of 2026) involving firearm injuries. The applicant argued that he was merely a co-accused, that the eye‑witness statement did not implicate him, and that the principal …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ubaid, who is accused under several IPC sections for a murder allegedly committed by firing a weapon, resulting in two injuries to the deceased. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that he had no prior criminal record, and …
Suraj filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1041 of 2020) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 352 and the SC/ST Act, and also requested that his bail application be decided expeditiously. The …
The applicant, Ajay Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 28‑05‑2014 in a case under Section 354(D) IPC, alleging a 12‑year delay violating his right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution. The applicant …
The applicant, Rinku Yadav, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.342 of 2025) involving several IPC sections and the Arms Act. While the application was pending, the applicant died in custody due to illness. Counsel for the applicant argued that the bail petition had become …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under sections 115(2), 352, 74 and 351(3) of the IPC. They claimed false implication and mala‑fide investigation. The …
Petitioner Kurban Ali filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking issuance of a fresh passport, which was pending with the Regional Passport Officer. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 275 of 2007) …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohit, who was charged in FIR No. 279/2026 for offences including Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 131, 115(2), 352, 117(2), 351(2) and 103(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant alleged that the allegations were false, that the case was …
Petitioners Avkash Maurya and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 29 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bihar National Security Act (BNSS). The State, …
The revisionists challenged the trial court's order of 10‑08‑2026 that framed charges under Sections 109(1)/3(5), 115(3)/3(5), 117(2)/3(5), 351(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, contending that there was no evidence to support the charge of attempt to murder and that the injured's statement was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lucky Saini, accused under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) BNS for a firearm assault on Navin Khanna. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the actual firing was done by co‑accused Dhruv Dhawan and that a monetary dispute …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Varun Singh (also known as Arvind Kumar Singh) under Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act in a case where the deceased had allegedly committed suicide. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Om Prakash Nishad, who is charged under IPC sections 376, 506, 452 and IT Act section 67 for alleged rape, intimidation, house‑trespass and possession of an obscene video. The applicant contended that the victim’s statements and the …
The accused Goldee Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 772 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 115, 351, 109, 191 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, arising from an alleged assault and firing incident on 14 July 2026. The FIR named four persons, including Kumar, as …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 6 March 2026, the cognizance order dated 5 August 2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2689 of 2026) arising from FIR charges under Sections 281, 109(1) and 352 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bharat Lodhi, who was charged under several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting the nephew and sister‑in‑law of an informant, resulting in the nephew's death. The applicant contended that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nikhil Gautam in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 103(1) of the IPC. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced only in a later statement of an informant who was not an eye‑witness. The eye‑witness, …
The applicants Ramesh and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 10‑05‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 15‑05‑2026 in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(3) and 352 of the IPC. They alleged false …
The applicant, Akhand Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (G.T. No. 521 of 2008) initiated under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, along with IPC …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 9, Varanasi, to dispose of a criminal case (Case No. 110142 of 2024) that had been pending since 2024. The case involved …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑01‑2021 issued in a criminal complaint (Arjun Singh v. Nitin Gupta, case No. 739 of 2014) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The counsel for the applicants …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hussain Mohammad and Nagina (applicants) who were arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 405 of 2026) under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2) and 191(2). The applicants, who are in‑laws of the deceased, argued that they were implicated …
The accused, Radhey Shyam, applied for bail in a criminal case under IPC Sections 109(1), 3(5) and 117(2) arising from a delayed FIR dated 01‑06‑2026. He claimed false implication, stating the FIR was lodged by the victim's brother against two other persons and that his name was added only after a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lalit Nagar, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 133 of 2026) under Sections 103(1), 3(5), 61(2) and 238(a) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case was based solely on the statements of a co‑accused, Sagar Kumar, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav Singh, who was in custody for offences under Sections 305(a), 317(2) and 331(3) of the Indian Penal Code arising from an alleged theft. The applicant argued that his name was identified only through a co‑accused’s statement and that he has …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order dated February and April 2025 in a case involving alleged offences under sections of the IPC. They alleged false implication and mala fide motives, arguing lack of evidence and …
Vinod Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 4 June 2015, the cognizance order dated 16 September 2015 and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 8100 of 2015 arising from an FIR under Section 409 of the Indian Penal …
The accused, Imran @ Romiyo, applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 565 of 2025) involving alleged assault with a knife and a blunt object under several IPC sections. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the assault resulted from sudden provocation, and that the injuries to the two …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Nishad, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 305 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR named the applicant, but the eye‑witness statement …
The accused Tanveer applied for enlargement of bail in a pending trial under Section 307 IPC (case No. 383 of 2019) alleging false police implication in an encounter with no injury to police. He had previously been granted bail in 2019 but could not appear due to the Covid‑19 pandemic and …
The applicant, Ramadhar Yadav, sought bail in a case originally filed under Section 87 of the Indian Penal Code against his son, which was later converted to Section 103(1) after a death. The prosecution’s case against the applicant rests solely on the statements of his son, a co-accused, and his …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Haidar Abbas, who feared arrest in a criminal case involving alleged forgery of a sale deed. The prosecution alleged that Abbas transferred Rs 1,00,000 to an impostor who had executed the deed, and he was named as the primary …
The accused Tinku applied for bail in a Section 307 IPC case (Crime No. 881 of 2015) alleging false implication in an FIR dated 06-11-2015. He surrendered on 27-07-2026 after learning of the trial and has been in custody since then, while the other co‑accused have already been released on bail. The …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amod Kumar, who was charged under sections 69, 352, 351(2) and 115(2) of the IPC for alleged rape. The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a broken consensual relationship and a broken promise of marriage, and argued …
The applicant, Smt Mamta, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 3 August 2026 that had rejected the victim’s application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Session Trial concerning offences under …
The applicant, Lakhvinder Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order dated 23‑08‑2024 that dismissed his discharge application in a rape case (Section 376‑C IPC) pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah. The …
The applicant Monu Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 22‑08‑2023 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑03‑2024 in a case under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The applicant contended that the offences are …
The applicant, Rajesh, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 450 cartons of illegal liquor and charged under Sections 60, 63 and 72 of the U.P. Excise Act and Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was merely the driver of the vehicle, had no role …
The accused, Virendra (also known as Chhote), applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366 IPC, with the bail petition filed under Sections 137(2) and 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim’s mother’s statement under …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav Sharma, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 151 of 2026) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the FIR was initially lodged at a different police station and later transferred, …
Petitioners Kamlesh and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and others from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The respondents argued that petitioner No.1 is already married and is in a live‑in …
Dheeraj Kumar was arrested in a murder case (Crime No. 36 of 2026) alleged under IPC sections 103(1), 351(3) and the Arms Act (sections 4 and 25). The prosecution’s case rests on a knife allegedly recovered from an open place and statements of witnesses who were not eye‑witnesses. The applicant …
The applicant, Sinku @ Mukesh, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 168 of 2026) based largely on a second statement by an informant and a confessional statement recorded by the investigating officer, with no other substantive evidence. The applicant sought bail, arguing that the …
The applicant, Iddu Shekh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑09‑2024 and the Section 82 process in Sessions Case No.1253 of 2013, arising from offences under Sections 41, 411, 413 and 414 of the IPC before a Special …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeraj, who was arrested in a case registered as Crime No. 137 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that the alleged victim, a 16‑year‑old girl, was a consenting …
Armaan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 248 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely …
