Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Industrial (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951

7 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

FEDERAL BANK LTD.versusSAGAR THOMAS AND OTHERS

2003 INSC 51526 September 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Sagar Thomas, a branch manager of Federal Bank, was dismissed after a disciplinary enquiry and challenged the dismissal by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court held the petition maintainable, deeming the bank a public authority performing a public duty. The bank a

FERTILIZER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED & ORS.versusM/S COROMANDAL SACKS PRIVATE LIMITED

2024 INSC 34826 April 2024Disposed off

M/s Coromandal Sacks supplied HDPE bags to Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd (FCIL) and sued for recovery of unpaid amounts, alleging price differences, liquidated damages, penalties and loss of unsold bags. FCIL contended it was a sick industrial company under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act,

NATIONAL TEXTILE WORKERS' UNION ETC.versusP.R. RAMKRISHNAN AND OTHERS

1982 INSC 9410 December 1982Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose when a group of shareholders filed a winding‑up petition against Ramakrishna Industries Ltd. and obtained an interim injunction that threatened the payment of wages and supplies to the company's employees. Three trade unions representing the workers applied to be impleaded as respondents, arguing that th

M/S. SIV INDUSTRIES LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS

2000 INSC 13410 March 2000Appeal(s) allowed

Mis. SIV Industries Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit, sought to withdraw (debond) from the EOU scheme and paid all customs and excise duties as required. The dispute centered on whether excise duty on the finished goods in stock at the time of debonding should be levied under Section 3(1) of the Central Excise and Sal

M/S OJAS INDS. (P) LTD.versusM/S OUDH SUGAR MILLS LTD. AND ORS.

2007 INSC 3602 April 2007Disposed off

The dispute arose when Ojas Industries filed an Industrial Entrepreneur Memorandum (IEM) to set up a sugar mill, and Oudh Sugar Mills filed a later IEM within 7.2 km of Ojas' proposed site. The Delhi High Court held that the 15‑km distance rule applied only between an existing and a proposed mill, not between two propo

M/S ASHOKA SMOKELESS COAL IND. P. LTD. AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 9431 December 2006Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of Coal India Ltd.'s electronic auction (E‑Auction) scheme for allocating coal to non‑core sector consumers. The petitioners argued that coal is an essential commodity and that the scheme's variable pricing, lack of a fixed price, and inclusion of core‑sector entities vi

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search