Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Judicial Officers' Protection Act, 1850

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

RACHAPUDI SUBBA RAOversusTHE ADVOCATE-GENERAL, ANDHRA PRADESH

1980 INSC 23110 December 1980Dismissed

R. Subba Rao, having lost two suits before an Additional Sub‑Judge, issued a notice accusing the judge of bad faith, malice and bias and demanding damages. The judge referred the notice to the High Court, which, on the Advocate‑General's petition, convicted Rao of criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of

S.P. GOELversusCOLLECTOR OF STAMPS

1995 INSC 8638 December 1995Dismissed

S.P. Goel applied to register a will, but the Sub‑Registrar impounded it, deeming it a deed of conveyance that was not duly stamped. The Collector of Stamps required additional documents and payment of stamp duty before registration could proceed. Goel filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, alleging

KHANAPURAM GANDAIAHversusADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER & ORS.

2010 INSC 14 January 2010Dismissed

Khanapuram Gandaiah, involved in multiple civil suits over land, sought under the Right to Information Act, 2005, the reasons why a judicial officer (Respondent No.4) had dismissed his miscellaneous appeal, alleging judicial dishonesty. His RTI application under Section 6 was rejected, and subsequent appeals before the

GANESAN REP BY ITS POWER AGENT G. RUKMANI GANESANversusTHE COMMISSIONER, THE TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS BOARD & ORS.

2019 INSC 6233 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Ganesan challenged the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board Commissioner's order condoning a 266‑day delay in filing an appeal under Section 69 of the Hindu Religious Endowment Charitable Act, 1959. The central issue was whether the Commissioner, a statutory authority, is a "court" f

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search