PURUSHOTTAMversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2013 INSC 79729 November 2013Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Karnataka High Court order that declared the allotment of Civic Amenity Site No.2, originally earmarked for a bank, to Bharat Petroleum for a petrol pump null and void. The Court examined Section 38A(1) and (2) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, which permit…
BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA PLANNING AUTHORITYversusBIRLA SUPER BULK TERMINAL (NOW A UNIT OF ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD.) AND ORS.
2018 INSC 110427 November 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The Bangalore International Airport Area Planning Authority (the appellant) sought betterment, road and other charges under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (KTCP) Act, 1961 from Birla Super Bulk Terminal (the respondent) for a cement terminal built on land allotted by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development …
M/S. VINAYAK HOUSE BUILDING COOPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2019 INSC 95226 August 2019Disposed off
The appellant, a cooperative housing society, was allotted 78 acres 16 guntas of land by the Karnataka Government for a housing layout, including 5 acres 33 guntas in Survey No.30. Respondent No.3, claiming ownership of that portion, challenged the acquisition and later sought de‑notification of 3 acres 5 guntas under …
H. KASHINATH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
1995 INSC 48121 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a lease granted by the Corporation of the City of Bangalore to the Karnataka Chalana Chitra Kalavidara Sangha, a society of film artists, for constructing a theatre and training school on land earmarked in the Comprehensive Development Plan for a public or semi‑public purpose. The petitioners…
BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY & ANR.versusNANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED & ORS.
2020 INSC 39919 May 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprise Ltd. and Nandi Economic Corridor Enterprises Ltd. (the Project Proponents) could obtain a commencement certificate for a 42‑acre group housing scheme that was not part of the five townships approved under the Framework Agreement (FWA) and the P…
R & M TRUSTversusKORAMANGALA RESIDENTS VIGILANCE GROUP AND ORS.
2005 INSC 4219 January 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, builders of multi‑storeyed apartments in Koramangala, Bangalore, obtained licences from the City Municipal Corporation to construct up to three floors. A residents' association filed a public‑interest petition seeking cancellation of the licences and demolition of the building, alleging strain on public…
CHADURANGA KANTHRAJ URS AND ANR.versusP. RAVI KUMAR AND ORS.
2024 INSC 95710 December 2024
The Supreme Court examined whether the State of Karnataka and its agencies wilfully disobeyed its earlier orders dated 21‑11‑2014, 17‑05‑2022 and 19‑03‑2024 directing the issuance of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) for land acquired for road widening. The petitioners alleged that the respondents delayed and altere…
MANTRI TECHZONE PVT. LTD.versusFORWARD FOUNDATION AND ORS.
2019 INSC 3155 March 2019Disposed off
The petitioners alleged that the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board had allotted ecologically sensitive land for a software technology park, resulting in encroachment of storm‑water drains (Rajakaluves) and damage to the Bellandur lake catchment. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) found violations of wetland an…
RAJATHA ENTERPRISESversusS.K. SHARMA & ORS.
1989 INSC 423 February 1989Disposed off
Rajatha Enterprises was granted a lease by the Karnataka Government to construct a shopping complex‑cum‑school on a government plot in Bangalore. The construction proceeded, but the Municipal Commissioner later ordered reduction of the building height and threatened demolition of the upper floors for alleged violations…