Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963

9 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

K. H. NAZARversusMATHEW K. JACOB & ORS.

2019 INSC 110030 September 2019Dismissed

The appellant, K.H. Nazar, sought environmental clearance to operate a quarry on land that was originally a plantation. Respondents filed writ petitions contending that the land could not be used for quarrying because such land does not qualify as a "commercial site" under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, and therefo

STATE OF KERALA & ANR.versusM/S POPULAR ESTATES (NOW DISSOLVED) & ANR.

2021 INSC 69329 October 2021Dismissed

The State of Kerala claimed that 1534.40 acres owned by M/s Popular Estates were private forests that vested in the State under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. Popular Estates argued that the lands were cultivated plantations and therefore exempt under the Act’s exclusion clauses. The Ker

AMINA BEEVIversusTHACHI & ORS.

2010 INSC 74427 October 2010Dismissed

The petitioners challenged a leasehold assignment deed (Exhibit A3) executed by the tenant Kunjali in favour of Abdul Kadar, arguing it was a valid assignment and that their remedy lay only in an application to the Land Tribunal under Section 13A of the Kerala Land Reforms Act. The Supreme Court held that the deed was

MATHAI MATHAIversusJOSEPH MARY @ MARYKKUTIY JOSEPH & ORS.

2014 INSC 32625 April 2014Dismissed

The appellant claimed to be a deemed tenant under Section 4A of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, relying on a mortgage deed executed in 1909‑1910 in favour of his mother as collateral for a dowry. The Supreme Court held that the mortgagee (the appellant's mother) was a minor of 15 years at the time of execution and w

MADHAVI AMMA & ORS.versusS. PRASANNAKUMARI & ORS.

2013 INSC 18922 March 2013Dismissed

The landlord filed an eviction suit under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, and the tenant claimed Kudikidappukaran status under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. The Rent Controller referred the status question to the Land Tribunal, which held the tenant was only a tenant, not a Kudikidappukara

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR.versusMOHAMMED BASHEER

2019 INSC 6522 January 2019Dismissed

The respondent Mohammed Basheer claimed ownership of about two acres of jenmam land, asserting that it was not a private forest under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 and that a certificate of purchase issued by the Land Tribunal under s.72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 vested title

THANKAMONY AMMA & ORS.versusOMANA AMMA N. & ORS.

2019 INSC 89613 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned a theatre built on land owned by Sankara Kurup. After his death, his son Viswanatha claimed ownership, while the son‑in‑law Kumara managed the theatre and later claimed tenancy under the Kerala Land Reforms Act. The Land Tribunal rejected Kumara’s tenancy claim, finding he was only a manager. The

STATE OF KERALAversusABDUL ALI

2013 INSC 23510 April 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether land that does not qualify as a "private forest" under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 can be subjected to a total prohibition of tree felling under Section 5 of the Kerala Preservation of Trees Act, 1986. The Court held that Explanation II of Section 5 i

N.K. RAJENDRA MOHANversusTHIRVAMADI RUBBER CO. LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 4712 July 2015Dismissed

In 1918 the plaintiffs leased 963.75 acres of land to Mr. Campbell Hunt for 36 years, allowing the lessee to cultivate any crop and clear forests. The lease later passed to Thiruvamadi Rubber Co., which continued possession after the lease expired, paying rent until 1978 and establishing a rubber plantation. The plaint

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search