S. K. MIGLANIversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI
2019 INSC 60230 April 2019Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a manager in Bank of Baroda, was charged with forgery and related offences for opening a fictitious savings account to encash a refund cheque. He filed an application under Section 197 of the CrPC seeking discharge on the ground that prosecution sanction was required, arguing that he was a public servant…
COMMON CAUSE : A REGISTERED SOCIETYversusUNION OF INDIA
2017 INSC 40827 April 2017Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed by Common Cause and other NGOs seeking a declaration that Rule 10(1) and Rule 10(4)(i) of the Search Committee Rules, 2014 were ultra vires the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 and that the appointment process for the Lokpal should be stayed until the pending Amendment Bil…
JUST SOCIETYversusUNION OF INDIA
2017 INSC 41027 April 2017Dismissed
The petitioners, a society, challenged several provisions of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, alleging they violated Articles 14 and 50 of the Constitution. The main contentions were that the Chief Justice of India or his nominee, as a mere member of the selection committee, should have primacy in appointing the Lo…
RAKESH KUMAR PAULversusSTATE OF ASSAM
2017 INSC 75416 August 2017Disposed off
Rakesh Kumar Paul was arrested under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and remained in custody for more than 60 days without a charge‑sheet. The State argued that because the offence could attract imprisonment of up to ten years, the 90‑day period under clause (i) of proviso (a) to Section 167(2) CrPC applied, den…
SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENTversusKAMTA PRASAD MISHRA AND OTHERS
2026 INSC 64415 June 2026Dismissed
The Special Police Establishment (SPE) of Madhya Pradesh, constituted under the 1947 Act to investigate corruption‑related offences, was directed by the High Court to disclose information sought by a Town Inspector under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI). The appellant argued that a 2011 State Government notific…
VIJAY RAJMOHANversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, ACB, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU
2022 INSC 106611 October 2022Dismissed
Vijay Rajmohan, a Central Secretariat Service officer, was alleged to have amassed disproportionate assets and was investigated by the CBI, which sought sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act from the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT). The DoPT consulted the Central Vigi…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusANAND MOHAN &ANR.
2015 INSC 4929 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, who were public servants, were accused of corrupt practices in the construction of a sub‑station and the Economic Offences Wing sought prior sanction for their prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Administrative Department declined to grant sanction, and the Special Judge direc…
ALOK KUMAR VERMAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2019 INSC 368 January 2019Disposed off
The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and the Government of India issued orders on 23 October 2018 divesting Director Alok Kumar Verma of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) of his powers, functions and supervisory role. The Director challenged the legality of these orders, arguing that under Section 4B(2) of th…